COMMENTS: 15
Is BPA, a Chemical Commonly Found in Food Containers, Ruining Your Sex Life?
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Food headlines via email.
When people ask whether modern synthetics are damaging their health and endangering future generations, Topic A is nearly always bisphenol A (BPA), a synthetic estrogen, an integral component of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins and one of the highest volume industrial chemicals in existence.
Now a ground-breaking study released in the journal of Human Reproduction offers what its authors call "the first evidence that exposure to BPA in the workplace could have an adverse effect on male sexual dysfunction."
The scientific team, underwritten by Kaiser Permanente's Division of Research in Oakland, CA., spent five years studying 634 Chinese factory workers whose bodies had been severely contaminated with BPA.
Animal studies link BPA to an extraordinary array of subtle but serious chronic health problems, including impairment of the ability to think and behave normally, reproductive and cardiovascular system damage, cancer, diabetes, asthma and obesity. Evidence of BPA's impact on human health has been more elusive, which is why the Kaiser Permanente study is making headlines around the globe.
After a year of being bombarded with BPA, the Chinese workers reported disturbing sexual problems: four times as much erectile dysfunction and seven times as many ejaculation difficulties as a control group, the Kaiser team found.
Most people don't experience BPA exposure nearly as intense as the factory workers. But nearly all Americans test positive for low-level BPA contamination, as evidenced by body burden testing by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Environmental Working Group and other academic and non-profit organizations.
As Kaiser research team leader De-Kun Li, MD, Ph.D., put it, the China workers study "raises the question: Is there a safe level for BPA exposure, and what is that level?"
Many scientists specializing in hormonal and reproductive systems say there's no such thing as a "safe" dose of BPA, a powerful endocrine-disrupting chemical. Earlier this week, the American Medical Association Board of Delegates resolved to work with the federal government to minimize the public's exposure to BPA and other endocrine-disrupting chemicals. The measure was proposed by the Endocrine Society, which, with 14,000 hormone researchers and medical specialists in more than 100 countries, recently warned that "even infinitesimally low levels of exposure [to endocrine-disrupting chemicals] -- indeed, any level of exposure at all -- may cause endocrine or reproductive abnormalities, particularly if exposure occurs during a critical developmental window. Surprisingly, low doses may even exert more potent effects than higher doses."
Stay up to date with the latest Food headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: warrior woman on Nov 17, 2009 4:09 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2 years ago, it was women and children: Chemical in Plastic May Harm Human Growth
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/
environment/la-na-plastic16apr16,1,5896274.story
Wednesday 16 April 2008
"A federal report finds "some concern" that fetuses, babies and children are at risk from bisphenol A. But plastics industry officials see no serious risk. Some scientists suspect that exposure early in life disrupts hormones and alters genes, programming a fetus or child for breast or prostate cancer, premature female puberty, attention deficit disorders and other reproductive or neurological disorders.
In its new report, the National Toxicology Program, which reviewed about 500 laboratory animal experiments, concluded that there was "some concern" that fetuses, babies and children were at risk from BPA. It rated as "negligible" the concern for adults."
How about pthalates? They're just as bad. http://www.ehponline.org/members/2005/8100/8100.html Decrease in Anogenital Distance among Male Infants with Prenatal Phthalate Exposure
Dozens of Chemicals Found in Most Americans' Bodies
By Marla Cone
The Los Angeles Times
Friday 22 July 2005
"The concentration is especially high in children, a national study says. But experts aren't sure what the health effects are.
In the largest study of chemical exposure ever conducted on human beings, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Thursday that most American children and adults were carrying in their bodies dozens of pesticides and toxic compounds used in consumer products, many of them linked to potential health threats.
The report documented bigger doses in children than in adults of many chemicals, including some pyrethroids, which are in virtually every household pesticide, and phthalates, which are found in nail polish and other beauty products as well as in soft plastics."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Pthalates too,It is all about money.
Posted by: union steamfitter
» RE: Pthalates too,It is all about money.
Posted by: IndyElliott
Comments are closed-
Posted by: orda on Nov 17, 2009 7:09 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"You go ahead with it, we'll make more Viagra."
When profit is your only concern...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How do you counter the effects or get it out of your system?
Posted by: warrior woman
» RE: How do you counter the effects or get it out of your system?
Posted by: RoffleTheWaffle
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gravitas on Nov 17, 2009 7:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would also like to point out that moderate obesity when natural is not a health problem. Many fat people in history lived long, healthy lives. For modern folk, obesity often is a side effect of something else more dangerous, like environmental pollution which causes both weight gain and diabetes. Because we have been taught to scapegoat obesity and look at it in moral terms, the underlying causes rarely get recognized or eliminated.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Nov 17, 2009 12:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BPA has grown breasts on two-year-old girls. Not in this country, yet. That was in a US protectorate.
Many species of animals will change sexes with enough estrogen-mimic chemicals. So, what gender were you hoping your baby would be, and do you want to make up now for what you didn't get then?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: postconsumer-consumer on Nov 17, 2009 3:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Food and plastic don't mix...
Posted by: IndyElliott
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Nov 17, 2009 3:06 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I lived to please no one but MYSELF, and I considered anyone standing in my way a nobody.
One day, all this got old. I think I grew up or something.
Weird stuff started happening. I began to view women as people in their own right and deserving of RESPECT and true affection, rather than girl toys.
Then I met a woman with a superb mind, and that was the end of my old ways. Marrying her made me a better man. Much better.
Through the years, I began to realize that as much fun as it is, sex is but one aspect of a relationship, and not some exhaulted obsession as it seems to be with some people. It has its place, along with the loving companionship and intellectual stimulation a good relationship provides.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How much of a "sex life" do you need?
Posted by: IndyElliott
Comments are closed-
Posted by: union steamfitter on Nov 17, 2009 3:31 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: patvic14056 on Nov 18, 2009 12:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that these chemicals have other side effects is unfortunate, and it might be worthwhile to work on THOSE problems - but not the fact that men can't fuck any more. Boo hoo.
How much money is spent on advertisement, TV and print media, for this "problem." Have you counted the pages and pages of "disclaimers" in slick mags for the drugs being touted (not all, I admit, for male erectile problems?) Any idea how much that costs???
R & D, the pharmas say they are spending for our benefit? Fuck, no. They spend it on advertising for poor men who can't get it up and will do anything for another chance to procreate (for their own pleasure - yup - not that pleasure is a bad thing, but if you can't get it on your own, why should the rest of us pay for it when folks are dying in need of REAL help???).
Spend those billions on real cures for real diseases that actually could save lives.
But, dream on, folks - there's not enough money in THAT.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dewre on Nov 21, 2009 12:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: warrior woman on Nov 17, 2009 4:09 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2 years ago, it was women and children: Chemical in Plastic May Harm Human Growth
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/
environment/la-na-plastic16apr16,1,5896274.story
Wednesday 16 April 2008
"A federal report finds "some concern" that fetuses, babies and children are at risk from bisphenol A. But plastics industry officials see no serious risk. Some scientists suspect that exposure early in life disrupts hormones and alters genes, programming a fetus or child for breast or prostate cancer, premature female puberty, attention deficit disorders and other reproductive or neurological disorders.
In its new report, the National Toxicology Program, which reviewed about 500 laboratory animal experiments, concluded that there was "some concern" that fetuses, babies and children were at risk from BPA. It rated as "negligible" the concern for adults."
How about pthalates? They're just as bad. http://www.ehponline.org/members/2005/8100/8100.html Decrease in Anogenital Distance among Male Infants with Prenatal Phthalate Exposure
Dozens of Chemicals Found in Most Americans' Bodies
By Marla Cone
The Los Angeles Times
Friday 22 July 2005
"The concentration is especially high in children, a national study says. But experts aren't sure what the health effects are.
In the largest study of chemical exposure ever conducted on human beings, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Thursday that most American children and adults were carrying in their bodies dozens of pesticides and toxic compounds used in consumer products, many of them linked to potential health threats.
The report documented bigger doses in children than in adults of many chemicals, including some pyrethroids, which are in virtually every household pesticide, and phthalates, which are found in nail polish and other beauty products as well as in soft plastics."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Pthalates too,It is all about money.
Posted by: union steamfitter
» RE: Pthalates too,It is all about money.
Posted by: IndyElliott
Comments are closed-
Posted by: orda on Nov 17, 2009 7:09 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"You go ahead with it, we'll make more Viagra."
When profit is your only concern...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How do you counter the effects or get it out of your system?
Posted by: warrior woman
» RE: How do you counter the effects or get it out of your system?
Posted by: RoffleTheWaffle
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gravitas on Nov 17, 2009 7:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would also like to point out that moderate obesity when natural is not a health problem. Many fat people in history lived long, healthy lives. For modern folk, obesity often is a side effect of something else more dangerous, like environmental pollution which causes both weight gain and diabetes. Because we have been taught to scapegoat obesity and look at it in moral terms, the underlying causes rarely get recognized or eliminated.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Nov 17, 2009 12:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BPA has grown breasts on two-year-old girls. Not in this country, yet. That was in a US protectorate.
Many species of animals will change sexes with enough estrogen-mimic chemicals. So, what gender were you hoping your baby would be, and do you want to make up now for what you didn't get then?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: postconsumer-consumer on Nov 17, 2009 3:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Food and plastic don't mix...
Posted by: IndyElliott
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Nov 17, 2009 3:06 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I lived to please no one but MYSELF, and I considered anyone standing in my way a nobody.
One day, all this got old. I think I grew up or something.
Weird stuff started happening. I began to view women as people in their own right and deserving of RESPECT and true affection, rather than girl toys.
Then I met a woman with a superb mind, and that was the end of my old ways. Marrying her made me a better man. Much better.
Through the years, I began to realize that as much fun as it is, sex is but one aspect of a relationship, and not some exhaulted obsession as it seems to be with some people. It has its place, along with the loving companionship and intellectual stimulation a good relationship provides.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How much of a "sex life" do you need?
Posted by: IndyElliott
Comments are closed-
Posted by: union steamfitter on Nov 17, 2009 3:31 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: patvic14056 on Nov 18, 2009 12:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that these chemicals have other side effects is unfortunate, and it might be worthwhile to work on THOSE problems - but not the fact that men can't fuck any more. Boo hoo.
How much money is spent on advertisement, TV and print media, for this "problem." Have you counted the pages and pages of "disclaimers" in slick mags for the drugs being touted (not all, I admit, for male erectile problems?) Any idea how much that costs???
R & D, the pharmas say they are spending for our benefit? Fuck, no. They spend it on advertising for poor men who can't get it up and will do anything for another chance to procreate (for their own pleasure - yup - not that pleasure is a bad thing, but if you can't get it on your own, why should the rest of us pay for it when folks are dying in need of REAL help???).
Spend those billions on real cures for real diseases that actually could save lives.
But, dream on, folks - there's not enough money in THAT.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dewre on Nov 21, 2009 12:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
One Company Thinks They've Created Fast Food With a Conscience -- Are They Right?
How Shopping Carts May Be Our Greatest Weapon in the Health Care Fight
The Newest Diet Trend: What Would Jesus Eat?




