Environment  
comments_image Comments

Industry Funded Politicians Hope To Thwart Pollution Penalties In North Carolina

A North Carolina agency backs Duke Energy in appeal of a judge's ruling to clean up its toxic spills.
 
 
Share

Photo Credit: YouTube Screenshot/Matt Wasson

 
 
 
 

On March 6th of this year, North Carolina Superior Court Judge Paul Ridgeway  handed down a ruling that Duke Energy must immediately prevent toxins from their coal ash ponds from leaking into the water supply, and also that the energy giant had to develop a plan to clean up all of the groundwater that they had contaminated in the state.  Ridgeway said that the state and the energy company  had been misinterpreting a state law for decades in order to avoid cleaning up their toxic mess.

Judge Ridgeway’s ruling gave the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission (EMC) the authority to hold Duke accountable for years of pollution.  And just when it looked like Duke Energy might finally have to pay for their environmental crimes, something magical happened for the dirty energy company:  The  EMC appealed Ridgeway’s ruling.

Rather than doing the job they were ordered to do by a judge, the state agency sided with Duke Energy in appealing the ruling, claiming that the state’s environmental laws do not give the agency the authority to order a cleanup of contaminated water supplies.

The EMC isn’t reacting this way because they are too busy, or because they don’t have the resources to enforce the cleanup – they joined the appeal because Duke Energy owns the state government in North Carolina.

The EMC claims to operate independently from the influence of state government, but they are  directly appointed by the government.  The board consists of 15 members appointed by Republican Governor Pat McCrory (8 appointments to the board), Republican House Speaker Thom Tillis, and Republican Senate leader Phil Berger (7 collective appointments to the board.)  The common thread among these politicians is that their campaigns were all funded by Duke Energy and a host of other dirty energy heavyweights.

Governor McCrory’s incestuous relationship with Duke Energy goes far  beyond the $1.1 million that the company has poured into his campaigns over the years.  McCrory was employed  by the company for 28 years before leaving in 2007 to start his political career. 

Knowing that the EMC panel would be faced with decisions about Duke Energy, it is nearly impossible to believe that the governor would appoint anyone who would dare question his former employer and top campaign donor’s activities.

What about  Berger and Tillis?  They have both been the recipients of Duke Energy campaign cash to the tune of $8,000 apiece in their last elections.  North Carolina law allows a contribution limit of $4,000 for a campaign, and an additional $4,000 for the primary.  Again, they would be reluctant to appoint a staunch environmentalist to a panel that decides the fate of their favorite campaign donor (or any of their dirty energy donors, which  includes Koch Industries for both Republican leaders.)

One of the committee members, Benne Hutson,  had to recuse himself from the panel’s decision to join Duke in the appeal, as he is actually an attorney for Duke Energy.  That alone tells you all you need to know about the caliber of people appointed to Governor McCrory’s EMC panel.

This is not the first time that Governor McCrory’s government officials have worked on behalf of Duke Energy.  After this year’s Dan River coal ash spill, Mother Jones explained that the North Carolina government stepped in several times in the last 12 months to shield the company from environmental lawsuits:

The Associated Press  reports that McCrory's Department of Environment and Natural Resources blocked three federal Clean Water Act suits in 2013 by stepping in with its own enforcement authority “at the last minute.” This protected Duke from the kinds of stiff fines and penalties that can result from federal lawsuits. Instead, state regulators arranged settlements that carried miniscule financial penalties and did not require Duke to change how it stores the toxic byproducts of its coal-fired power plants. After blocking the first three suits, which were brought by the Southern Environmental Law Center, the state filed notices saying that it would handle environmental enforcement at every one of Duke's remaining North Carolina coal ash storage sites—protecting the company from Clean Water Act lawsuits linked to its coal waste once and for all.

 
See more stories tagged with: