COMMENTS: 36
Is Your Organic Food Really Organic?
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.
Chinese imports have had a bad year in the news, making headlines for contaminated pet food, toxic toys, and recently, certified organic ginger contaminated with levels of a pesticide called aldicarb that can cause nausea, headaches and blurred vision even at low levels. The ginger, sold under the 365 label at Whole Foods Market, contained a level of aldicarb not even permissible for conventional ginger, let alone organics. Whole Foods immediately pulled the product from its shelves.
Ronnie Cummins, the national director of the Organic Consumers Association, emphasizes that most organic farmers "play by the rules." They believe in organic principles and thereby comply with organic standards. Unfortunately, Congress' pitifully inadequate funding for enforcement, including for organic imports from countries like China, "guarantees it'll be easy for unscrupulous players to cheat, and that's obviously what's going on here."
Farms that produce USDA-certified organic food are not personally inspected by anyone from the USDA National Organic Program (NOP). As a small and underfunded agency within the USDA (it has fewer than a dozen employees), NOP relies on what it calls Accredited Certifying Agencies -- ACAs -- to do the legwork. The ACAs take responsibility for ensuring that any farm or processor bearing the organic label meets the strict requirements for certification.
Since the Chinese government does not allow foreigners to inspect Chinese farms, an extra step is involved for oversight of organics from China: Chinese companies, which are allowed to inspect Chinese farms, subcontract with foreign ACAs. Cummins believes "the safest course of action is ... to say we won't certify imports from China because their law won't allow inspections."
For Americans who shop at the growing number of farmers markets springing up around the country, the status of organics from China -- or even organics from faraway U.S. states -- may be irrelevant. Just as the hippies who founded the movement intended, ethical eating extends beyond pesticide-free food for these shoppers, some of whom call themselves locavores, meaning "one who eats food produced locally." They wish to support small farmers and to ensure their food was produced in an environmentally friendly manner by workers who were treated well and paid fairly.
And not matter how strict a law may be, there will always be those who game the system. Even if a Chinese inspector notices illegal pesticide use, he or she might feel pressured to stay silent, says Dr. Robert E. Hegel, professor of Chinese and Comparative Literature at Washington University in St. Louis. "Everybody there is so proud of increased production that few people ask much about the farmer's production methods," says Hegel. "And there's no 'organic' food tradition in China." According to Hegel, in China "everything was just 'food' and it was, until the 1950s, mostly 'organic' by our contemporary definitions -- fertilized with human and animal waste, compost ... and ashes."
But for an American looking for high-quality organics, the number one way to ensure that's what you're getting is to buy directly from the farmer. Farmers markets or CSAs (community supported agriculture -- arrangements in which consumers buy a share in a farm and receive weekly boxes of produce) are excellent ways to go as you can often meet the farmer or visit the farm yourself. Even if you can't make the trip to the farm personally, typically a farmers market sets rules around what is and is not permitted at the market (for example, only allowing produce grown within the state), and a market manager visits each farm to guarantee adherence to the policy.
The problem with fraudulent Chinese organics merely drives home the larger problem that sustainable and ethical eating is about forming relationships, and trying to fit it into the global, industrialized mold of the rest of our food system does not work. For example, the Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based watchdog agency, reports on American dairies Horizon and Aurora, which operate organic factory farms milking thousands of cows each. Over the past year, the USDA finally penalized Aurora, supplier of private label milk to Wal-Mart, Safeway and Costco, for violating organic standards.
While the National Organic Program is poorly funded, perhaps it would be more effective if the USDA staffed it with people who felt strongly about organics. Cummins mentioned a North Carolina organic activist and farmer who suggested eating at Nora's, a well-known Washington, D.C., organic restaurant, to NOP staff. He was shocked when they responded enthusiastically that they would love to try it because they had hardly ever eaten organic food before.
Because organics (and ethical eating in general) is ultimately about values and personal relationships, Cummins believes the most important next step is establishing a peer review panel, as called for by law, "so that respected members of the organic community can monitor and police violations of organic standards on the part of producers, importers and certifiers." The USDA acknowledges the requirement of a peer review panel by law but has yet to implement it.
Because knowledgeable members of the organic community who share the consumers' values will be able to look out for their interests, consumers can feel more confident in the organics they buy from the store with a peer review panel in place. Store-bought organics might not be equal to buying directly from a farmer, but in today's hectic world, when you can't make it out to a farm or a farmers market, we need to make sure they are a close second.
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ghost in the machine on Aug 7, 2008 4:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CApitalism invariably chews us all up and spits us out .Transforms nature into commodities and makes toxic consumers of us all.....just look at all the super fat woddlers.Visit the storyofstuff website
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I agree, no surprise. When this congress passed the bill putting....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Christen=Mitchell on Aug 7, 2008 5:53 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» What is "desth" and what is a "natural cause"?
Posted by: toddcory
» RE: What is "desth" and what is a "natural cause"?
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: What is "desth" and what is a "natural cause"?
Posted by: grn1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kenhymes on Aug 7, 2008 7:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Oh, poppycock...... the FDA is a revolving door for the drug companies....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jwverez on Aug 7, 2008 7:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
usda fda "grass fed" "big government"
and you'll see why.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: schahczenski on Aug 7, 2008 8:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Knowing your farmer is a good thing, whether that farmer is organic or not. However, this is a difficult thing for most folks to do.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: QQOblivion on Aug 7, 2008 8:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By the way, this was years before the Bush administration gutted consumer protections in this country. So the situation is certainly much worse today.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: No Surprise
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» Now that is good news. I heard that frogs were disappearing.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Now that is good news. I heard that frogs were disappearing.
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: No Surprise
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: No Surprise
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nicnic on Aug 7, 2008 8:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What people don't realize is that the new organic standard is a process standard. It has nothing to do with directly certifying the food itself. Instead, it's an indirect process. They are simply lying to you. For instance, go to Quality Assurance International (a certifier borne out of the new standards, how convenient) and select Certified Clients and then Whole Foods - Private Label (notice all the Whole Foods entities). You then see that this massive retailer has a blanket certification for "Handler (Trader)." Click on Handler (Trader) to see a 17 page list of these blanket certifications. Now then, here’s the catch. Whole Foods can resell products under these certifications as a handler, meaning they are certified to accept product in bulk from another source, package it and sell it. The certification only covers the actions of Whole Foods for the handling process and nothing else. None the less, part of the certification process is to ensure that the previous provider of the bulk product has also been certified in the appropriate classification. Notice I say previous provider, handler, trader, distributor, etc. or whatever because the chain can be exhaustively long. You’re supposed to be convinced that everything is then “certifiably” traceable back to the field or the “growing standard”, that thing from the past that we all assumed to be the only meaningful certification. Hey guess what? The identity of any other entities in the chain cannot be revealed by law (how convenient).
What good is USDA certification if it’s not verifiable? The potential for abuse is staggering. Those of us eating true organic for 20 years or more can spot the fakes everywhere. You’ll find wispy green new-age sounding brand names on the shelves of conventional retailers in packages that have fancy websites, etc. But when you really dig into this food company you find they grow nothing and you’re powerless to find out where the food actually came from. What kind of nonsense is this? Fortunately for us the proof of the pudding is in the tasting (and the brighter color, and the smaller size, and the density, etc.) and we can flush out the impostors easily. Newcomers to the “health/green quest” are easily duped into buying some irradiated third world sub-standard grain for inflated organic prices. God does Whole Foods love these people, especially the demographically qualified.
The solution is then to know and support your growers whether they’re national or local. Investigate them and verify them yourself. Chances are, More than likely if they’re completely legit they’ll claim to a previous standard, which is a lot more stringent the current USDA standard. Also try to buy fresh produce and bulk dry goods and avoid prepared, canned or frozen items. Shop the smaller mom and pop stores for quality and trust; like Mom's in the DC/MD area. Get to know your retailers personally and participate directly in one or more local CSAs.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: USDA Organic Certification Means Only That It Was Paid For
Posted by: eboy
» RE: USDA Organic Certification Means Only That It Was Paid For
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: USDA Organic Certification Means Only That It Was Paid For
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thevegegurl on Aug 7, 2008 9:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Aug 7, 2008 9:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Again why the surprise? The "free marketers" like to talk about the global village, how we cannot enforce rules on other countries, yadda, yadda, yadda. Maybe it's time that we the people step up to the plate and start demanding some action, you know the responsibilities and accountabilities that the government owes to we the people!
These agencies are there to protect we the people from these very incidents (led in toys, tainted food, hazardous pharmaceuticals, etc.), and yet they have been denigrated and under-funded to the point that they are barely able to do their jobs! Instead of hoping that it's only just one bad apple, after all of the rotten things that have happened over the last 8 years - maybe it's time to throw out the barrel and start all over again!
My question is can somebody tell me what is "partisan" about: healthcare, food safety, product safety, infrastructure, water quality, climate change, or a host of other issues!?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why be surprised?!?!?
Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: Why be surprised?!?!?
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vasumurti on Aug 7, 2008 10:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Insects are killed only when they intrude upon human territory, posing a threat to the comfort, health, or well-being of humans. There is a huge difference between ridding oneself of intruders and going out of one's way to find and kill something which would otherwise be harmless."
According to Akers:
"These questions may have a certain fascination for philosophers, but most vegetarians are not bothered by them. For any vegetarian who is not a biological pacifist, there would not seem to be any particular difficulty in distinguishing ethically between insects and plants on the one hand, and animals and humans on the other."
I'd like to see a return to organic farming. In 1989, concern over the use of the pesticide Alar on apples caused many Americans to consider organic produce. We produce pesticides at a rate some 13,000 times faster than we did in the 1950s. Our environment is being flooded by pesticide compounds.
Poisons used to kill insects accumulate on crops, in the soil and in greater concentration in the tissues of living creatures higher on the food chain. The EPA's Pesticide Monitoring Journal reports that "Foods of animal origin (are) the major source of pesticide residues in the diet."
In his Pulitzer Prize nominated book, How to Survive in America the Poisoned, Lewis Regenstein writes: "Meat contains approximately 14 times more pesticides than do plant foods...Thus, by eating foods of animal origin, one ingests greatly concentrated amounts of hazardous chemicals."
A 1976 study by the EPA found the breast milk of mothers who consume animal products to be 50 to 100 times more contaminated by pesticide residues than the milk of vegetarian or vegan mothers.
Organic farming and Integrated Pest Management (IPM) are getting more attention today. These utilize natural insect controls, such as predatory insects, weather, crop rotation, pest-resistant varieties, soil tillage, and other environmentally safe practices.
A 1979 Department of Agriculture task force of scientists and economists came to "...positive conclusions on the importance of organic farming and its potential contributions to agriculture and society." Until the end of the Second World War, American farmers produced bountiful harvests without relying on pesticides. There is no reason why America cannot do so again.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Whether we want to or not, we are going to be forced into...
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 7, 2008 11:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WASHINGTON, Oct. 15, 2007 — The U.S. Department of Agriculture today issued a voluntary standard for grass (forage) fed marketing claims. The standard will be published as a Notice in the Federal Register and is titled the U.S. Standard for Livestock and Meat Marketing Claim, Grass (Forage) Fed Claim for Ruminant Livestock and the Meat Products Derived from Such Livestock. …
-USDA Press Release
Wonderful. Once again the USDA is out to subvert the meaning of our language and hand over the food market to big corporate interests. They are going to take over the term grass fed just like they took over the term organic so that big business can benefit and those of use who have been doing it for years will be shoved out the back door.
On the face of it it looks like they’re going to be helpful and define grass fed so that the term isn’t abused by corps that aren’t actually doing grass feeding to their livestock. The reality is that once they have control they’ll change, dilute and pollute the term by letting animals kept in confinement operations but fed a partial grass diet be defined as grass fed so as to further confuse consumers and steal away the remaining minimal portion of the market that small farmers have.
Voluntary will become mandatory. Soon you will not be able to use the term grass fed unless you signup with the USDA and pay them their bribe price. The fees will be set high enough to exclude the vast majority of small farmers who are already practicing pastured grass fed raising of livestock.
It started this way with organic standards. Then they locked out those of us who really do organic. Then they allowed non-organic practices to be used by Big Ag but still be labeled certified ‘USDA Certified Organic’.
This is about big monied lobbyists manipulating regulations, laws and definitions to benefit their corporate masters so they can corner the market and force out the competition from small farmers.
One more way our government ‘helps’ us. Anything to do with the government is not voluntary for long. Eventually the busy bodies mandate it because they ‘know what is best for you’. The last thing we need is more government regulation. I strongly suggest everyone check out a truly voluntary, farmer based, program for Certified Naturally Grown at http://NaturallyGrown.org
The solution is for consumers to buy locally from farmers they know and trust. But there’s no money in that for the high paid lobbyists and big corporations. Note that the USDA spends billions of dollars subsidizing Big Ag but only a few million dollars promoting local small farm to consumer programs like “Community Food Projects” which has been cut from the recent farm bill. Given that the “Community Food Projects” is a $5 million item and the federal budget is $2,387 billion this is like the a miser worrying over the loss of 0.0002 cents. That’s 1.6 cents for every man, woman and child. Yet at the same time they’re worrying about a dropping a penny to the poor they’re giving away nearly $13 billion of subsidies to Big Ag.
It’s time to end farm subsidies and stop having Nanny state government micro-manage our lives.
… The standard will be published in the Oct. 16, 2007, Federal Register. Copies of the proposal and more information are available by accessing the Web site at http://www.ams.usda.gov/lsg/stand/claim.htm; from Martin E. O’Connor, AMS Livestock and Seed Programs, Room 2607–S, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-0254; or by calling (202) 720-4486.
-USDA Press Release
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» If all food is eventually overseas... then we are controlled by...
Posted by: Prophit
» I think the water privatization is starting to backfire but
Posted by: jwverez
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jrose on Aug 7, 2008 1:28 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pesticide Residues and Organic Products
August 5, 2008
On July 24, WJLA News in Washington, D.C., reported low levels of pesticide detected in organic ginger, and followed with a subsequent story airing Aug 5. Like shoppers, the organic community is very concerned about reports of such pesticide contamination in the food supply. Consumers choose organic products because they trust organic farmers to not use toxic and persistent pesticides that can end up in the food chain.
The Organic Trade Association (OTA) supports the steps taken by the companies involved to move quickly and remove products from the shelf and provide rapid trace back to the source in China. OTA also urges the National Organic Program (NOP) to quickly determine specifically how the contamination occurred. OTA would urge the organic community to use the findings to take steps to improve the system to help prevent such incidents in the future.
The way organic foods are grown and processed is more closely monitored than other types of food production, and organic foods must meet or exceed all federal organic regulations as well as all applicable food safety regulations. For over 12 years, OTA has been advocating for proper funding for NOP, so that it has the resources it needs to create and enforce the organic regulations that cover all organic food and beverage products sold in the U.S. OTA continues to support the work of the National Organic Program.
Organic crops, like any crops, may be inadvertently exposed to agricultural chemicals that are now pervasive in rain and ground water due to their overuse during the past fifty years, and due to drift via wind and rain. In the United States alone, more than one billion pounds of pesticides are released into the environment each year. As a result, consumers are exposed to them daily in the food they eat, the water they drink, the air and dust they breathe, as well as on surfaces inside their homes and at work, and in public places. Aldicarb, like many toxic and persistent pesticides, remains in the environment long after application.
Organic agriculture is about the process of production, and cannot guarantee that all farm products are free of pesticide contamination that already pervades the planet. And yet, organic farming is part of the solution to reduce reliance on potentially dangerous pesticides and fertilizers highly dependent on oil and natural gas for their production. Supporting organic farmers, no matter where they are on the planet, helps to take care of the water and soil resources.
It is really important that such incidents as the one reported come to light and that a determination is made on went wrong so the findings can be used to improve the system. Strict enforcement of organic standards can bolster consumer confidence in the integrity of organic products they buy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Aug 7, 2008 4:08 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AdamG on Aug 7, 2008 5:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't trust who you can't hang.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chlamor on Aug 7, 2008 7:29 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stop addressing pet issues.
Address root causes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pursah on Aug 8, 2008 5:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jwverez on Aug 8, 2008 8:19 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ghost in the machine on Aug 7, 2008 4:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CApitalism invariably chews us all up and spits us out .Transforms nature into commodities and makes toxic consumers of us all.....just look at all the super fat woddlers.Visit the storyofstuff website
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I agree, no surprise. When this congress passed the bill putting....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Christen=Mitchell on Aug 7, 2008 5:53 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» What is "desth" and what is a "natural cause"?
Posted by: toddcory
» RE: What is "desth" and what is a "natural cause"?
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: What is "desth" and what is a "natural cause"?
Posted by: grn1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kenhymes on Aug 7, 2008 7:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Oh, poppycock...... the FDA is a revolving door for the drug companies....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jwverez on Aug 7, 2008 7:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
usda fda "grass fed" "big government"
and you'll see why.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: schahczenski on Aug 7, 2008 8:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Knowing your farmer is a good thing, whether that farmer is organic or not. However, this is a difficult thing for most folks to do.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: QQOblivion on Aug 7, 2008 8:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By the way, this was years before the Bush administration gutted consumer protections in this country. So the situation is certainly much worse today.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: No Surprise
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» Now that is good news. I heard that frogs were disappearing.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Now that is good news. I heard that frogs were disappearing.
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: No Surprise
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: No Surprise
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nicnic on Aug 7, 2008 8:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What people don't realize is that the new organic standard is a process standard. It has nothing to do with directly certifying the food itself. Instead, it's an indirect process. They are simply lying to you. For instance, go to Quality Assurance International (a certifier borne out of the new standards, how convenient) and select Certified Clients and then Whole Foods - Private Label (notice all the Whole Foods entities). You then see that this massive retailer has a blanket certification for "Handler (Trader)." Click on Handler (Trader) to see a 17 page list of these blanket certifications. Now then, here’s the catch. Whole Foods can resell products under these certifications as a handler, meaning they are certified to accept product in bulk from another source, package it and sell it. The certification only covers the actions of Whole Foods for the handling process and nothing else. None the less, part of the certification process is to ensure that the previous provider of the bulk product has also been certified in the appropriate classification. Notice I say previous provider, handler, trader, distributor, etc. or whatever because the chain can be exhaustively long. You’re supposed to be convinced that everything is then “certifiably” traceable back to the field or the “growing standard”, that thing from the past that we all assumed to be the only meaningful certification. Hey guess what? The identity of any other entities in the chain cannot be revealed by law (how convenient).
What good is USDA certification if it’s not verifiable? The potential for abuse is staggering. Those of us eating true organic for 20 years or more can spot the fakes everywhere. You’ll find wispy green new-age sounding brand names on the shelves of conventional retailers in packages that have fancy websites, etc. But when you really dig into this food company you find they grow nothing and you’re powerless to find out where the food actually came from. What kind of nonsense is this? Fortunately for us the proof of the pudding is in the tasting (and the brighter color, and the smaller size, and the density, etc.) and we can flush out the impostors easily. Newcomers to the “health/green quest” are easily duped into buying some irradiated third world sub-standard grain for inflated organic prices. God does Whole Foods love these people, especially the demographically qualified.
The solution is then to know and support your growers whether they’re national or local. Investigate them and verify them yourself. Chances are, More than likely if they’re completely legit they’ll claim to a previous standard, which is a lot more stringent the current USDA standard. Also try to buy fresh produce and bulk dry goods and avoid prepared, canned or frozen items. Shop the smaller mom and pop stores for quality and trust; like Mom's in the DC/MD area. Get to know your retailers personally and participate directly in one or more local CSAs.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: USDA Organic Certification Means Only That It Was Paid For
Posted by: eboy
» RE: USDA Organic Certification Means Only That It Was Paid For
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: USDA Organic Certification Means Only That It Was Paid For
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thevegegurl on Aug 7, 2008 9:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Aug 7, 2008 9:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Again why the surprise? The "free marketers" like to talk about the global village, how we cannot enforce rules on other countries, yadda, yadda, yadda. Maybe it's time that we the people step up to the plate and start demanding some action, you know the responsibilities and accountabilities that the government owes to we the people!
These agencies are there to protect we the people from these very incidents (led in toys, tainted food, hazardous pharmaceuticals, etc.), and yet they have been denigrated and under-funded to the point that they are barely able to do their jobs! Instead of hoping that it's only just one bad apple, after all of the rotten things that have happened over the last 8 years - maybe it's time to throw out the barrel and start all over again!
My question is can somebody tell me what is "partisan" about: healthcare, food safety, product safety, infrastructure, water quality, climate change, or a host of other issues!?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why be surprised?!?!?
Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: Why be surprised?!?!?
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vasumurti on Aug 7, 2008 10:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Insects are killed only when they intrude upon human territory, posing a threat to the comfort, health, or well-being of humans. There is a huge difference between ridding oneself of intruders and going out of one's way to find and kill something which would otherwise be harmless."
According to Akers:
"These questions may have a certain fascination for philosophers, but most vegetarians are not bothered by them. For any vegetarian who is not a biological pacifist, there would not seem to be any particular difficulty in distinguishing ethically between insects and plants on the one hand, and animals and humans on the other."
I'd like to see a return to organic farming. In 1989, concern over the use of the pesticide Alar on apples caused many Americans to consider organic produce. We produce pesticides at a rate some 13,000 times faster than we did in the 1950s. Our environment is being flooded by pesticide compounds.
Poisons used to kill insects accumulate on crops, in the soil and in greater concentration in the tissues of living creatures higher on the food chain. The EPA's Pesticide Monitoring Journal reports that "Foods of animal origin (are) the major source of pesticide residues in the diet."
In his Pulitzer Prize nominated book, How to Survive in America the Poisoned, Lewis Regenstein writes: "Meat contains approximately 14 times more pesticides than do plant foods...Thus, by eating foods of animal origin, one ingests greatly concentrated amounts of hazardous chemicals."
A 1976 study by the EPA found the breast milk of mothers who consume animal products to be 50 to 100 times more contaminated by pesticide residues than the milk of vegetarian or vegan mothers.
Organic farming and Integrated Pest Management (IPM) are getting more attention today. These utilize natural insect controls, such as predatory insects, weather, crop rotation, pest-resistant varieties, soil tillage, and other environmentally safe practices.
A 1979 Department of Agriculture task force of scientists and economists came to "...positive conclusions on the importance of organic farming and its potential contributions to agriculture and society." Until the end of the Second World War, American farmers produced bountiful harvests without relying on pesticides. There is no reason why America cannot do so again.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Whether we want to or not, we are going to be forced into...
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 7, 2008 11:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WASHINGTON, Oct. 15, 2007 — The U.S. Department of Agriculture today issued a voluntary standard for grass (forage) fed marketing claims. The standard will be published as a Notice in the Federal Register and is titled the U.S. Standard for Livestock and Meat Marketing Claim, Grass (Forage) Fed Claim for Ruminant Livestock and the Meat Products Derived from Such Livestock. …
-USDA Press Release
Wonderful. Once again the USDA is out to subvert the meaning of our language and hand over the food market to big corporate interests. They are going to take over the term grass fed just like they took over the term organic so that big business can benefit and those of use who have been doing it for years will be shoved out the back door.
On the face of it it looks like they’re going to be helpful and define grass fed so that the term isn’t abused by corps that aren’t actually doing grass feeding to their livestock. The reality is that once they have control they’ll change, dilute and pollute the term by letting animals kept in confinement operations but fed a partial grass diet be defined as grass fed so as to further confuse consumers and steal away the remaining minimal portion of the market that small farmers have.
Voluntary will become mandatory. Soon you will not be able to use the term grass fed unless you signup with the USDA and pay them their bribe price. The fees will be set high enough to exclude the vast majority of small farmers who are already practicing pastured grass fed raising of livestock.
It started this way with organic standards. Then they locked out those of us who really do organic. Then they allowed non-organic practices to be used by Big Ag but still be labeled certified ‘USDA Certified Organic’.
This is about big monied lobbyists manipulating regulations, laws and definitions to benefit their corporate masters so they can corner the market and force out the competition from small farmers.
One more way our government ‘helps’ us. Anything to do with the government is not voluntary for long. Eventually the busy bodies mandate it because they ‘know what is best for you’. The last thing we need is more government regulation. I strongly suggest everyone check out a truly voluntary, farmer based, program for Certified Naturally Grown at http://NaturallyGrown.org
The solution is for consumers to buy locally from farmers they know and trust. But there’s no money in that for the high paid lobbyists and big corporations. Note that the USDA spends billions of dollars subsidizing Big Ag but only a few million dollars promoting local small farm to consumer programs like “Community Food Projects” which has been cut from the recent farm bill. Given that the “Community Food Projects” is a $5 million item and the federal budget is $2,387 billion this is like the a miser worrying over the loss of 0.0002 cents. That’s 1.6 cents for every man, woman and child. Yet at the same time they’re worrying about a dropping a penny to the poor they’re giving away nearly $13 billion of subsidies to Big Ag.
It’s time to end farm subsidies and stop having Nanny state government micro-manage our lives.
… The standard will be published in the Oct. 16, 2007, Federal Register. Copies of the proposal and more information are available by accessing the Web site at http://www.ams.usda.gov/lsg/stand/claim.htm; from Martin E. O’Connor, AMS Livestock and Seed Programs, Room 2607–S, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-0254; or by calling (202) 720-4486.
-USDA Press Release
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» If all food is eventually overseas... then we are controlled by...
Posted by: Prophit
» I think the water privatization is starting to backfire but
Posted by: jwverez
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jrose on Aug 7, 2008 1:28 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pesticide Residues and Organic Products
August 5, 2008
On July 24, WJLA News in Washington, D.C., reported low levels of pesticide detected in organic ginger, and followed with a subsequent story airing Aug 5. Like shoppers, the organic community is very concerned about reports of such pesticide contamination in the food supply. Consumers choose organic products because they trust organic farmers to not use toxic and persistent pesticides that can end up in the food chain.
The Organic Trade Association (OTA) supports the steps taken by the companies involved to move quickly and remove products from the shelf and provide rapid trace back to the source in China. OTA also urges the National Organic Program (NOP) to quickly determine specifically how the contamination occurred. OTA would urge the organic community to use the findings to take steps to improve the system to help prevent such incidents in the future.
The way organic foods are grown and processed is more closely monitored than other types of food production, and organic foods must meet or exceed all federal organic regulations as well as all applicable food safety regulations. For over 12 years, OTA has been advocating for proper funding for NOP, so that it has the resources it needs to create and enforce the organic regulations that cover all organic food and beverage products sold in the U.S. OTA continues to support the work of the National Organic Program.
Organic crops, like any crops, may be inadvertently exposed to agricultural chemicals that are now pervasive in rain and ground water due to their overuse during the past fifty years, and due to drift via wind and rain. In the United States alone, more than one billion pounds of pesticides are released into the environment each year. As a result, consumers are exposed to them daily in the food they eat, the water they drink, the air and dust they breathe, as well as on surfaces inside their homes and at work, and in public places. Aldicarb, like many toxic and persistent pesticides, remains in the environment long after application.
Organic agriculture is about the process of production, and cannot guarantee that all farm products are free of pesticide contamination that already pervades the planet. And yet, organic farming is part of the solution to reduce reliance on potentially dangerous pesticides and fertilizers highly dependent on oil and natural gas for their production. Supporting organic farmers, no matter where they are on the planet, helps to take care of the water and soil resources.
It is really important that such incidents as the one reported come to light and that a determination is made on went wrong so the findings can be used to improve the system. Strict enforcement of organic standards can bolster consumer confidence in the integrity of organic products they buy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Aug 7, 2008 4:08 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AdamG on Aug 7, 2008 5:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't trust who you can't hang.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chlamor on Aug 7, 2008 7:29 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stop addressing pet issues.
Address root causes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pursah on Aug 8, 2008 5:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jwverez on Aug 8, 2008 8:19 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
California Carbon Trading Allows Timber Companies to Sell CO2 Credits for Their Worst Logging Practices
How to Answer the Dumb Things Climate Deniers Say




