Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Offshore Drilling Won't Help, But "Green Stimulus" Can

By Mark Weisbrot, AlterNet. Posted August 1, 2008.


A "green stimulus" package would give the economy a lift while simultaneously reducing energy consumption.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

"Gas prices -- $4, $5, no end in sight, because some in Washington are still saying no to drilling in America," says the narrator in the TV ad that Republican presidential candidate John McCain played last week.

"Who can you thank for rising prices at the pump?"

Cut to crowd, chanting: "Obama, Obama."

Yes, this is a real political ad on TV, complete with "I'm John McCain and I approve this message." It is not The Onion.

Reality check: First, Senator McCain's proposal to "drill more in America and rescue our family budgets" -- that is, to open up environmentally sensitive offshore areas to oil drilling -- would take about a decade to produce any oil. That's according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the U.S. Department of Energy.

Maybe by "family budgets" McCain meant rescuing families in 2018. Or maybe not. According to the EIA, the total amount of oil that this drilling would produce at peak 20 years from now would be less than 0.2 percent of world production. This would be too small to have any significant effect on the price of oil or gasoline, according to the EIA.

Last Sunday, on the ABC morning talk show "This Week," Senator McCain again mentioned "offshore drilling" as part of a plan to reduce dependence on foreign oil. He got away with it, since the host didn't ask him how such a tiny amount of oil would have any significant effect on imports. He included a number of other things, too, but did not mention mileage standards for cars, mass transit, or conservation generally.

Fuel efficiency standards for passenger vehicles in the United States have barely changed since 1985. If we had chosen to raise these standards (for cars and light trucks) by less than one half mile (0.4 miles) per year, the average car on the road would be getting 32 miles per gallon. This would reduce our oil consumption by 3.3 million barrels per day, or more than 16 times what McCain's offshore drilling would get us twenty years from now.

Mass transit could also be greatly expanded, as today's gasoline prices have made people more than ready to use it. This would not only save a lot more oil imports than offshore drilling, it would also provide jobs and an economic stimulus at a time when it is badly needed. The U.S. economic downturn is just beginning: we built up an $8 trillion housing bubble during the decade from 1996-2006, and only about 60 percent of it has burst so far. At the current rate of house price declines, another $2 trillion in housing wealth will disappear this year. Consumer spending, which is 70 percent of the economy, is likely to decline and the labor market will continue to weaken. The prior stimulus package passed in February has given some boost to the economy for the first half of this year, but much more will be needed.

A "green stimulus" package would give the economy a lift while simultaneously reducing energy consumption. This would include not only mass transit but also tax credits for homeowners and businesses to make building improvements that conserve energy. These would include renovations such as solar panels and insulation. Sizeable tax credits in this area would also help the ailing construction industry, an important part of our economy that has collapsed with the housing bubble.

All of these measures make a lot more sense than drilling for very little oil in environmentally sensitive areas, while trying to blame Barack Obama for rising gasoline prices.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: energy, obama, mccain, offshore drilling, green stimulus

Mark Weisbrot is Co-Director and co-founder of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. He received his Ph.D. in economics from the University of Michigan. He is co-author, with Dean Baker, of Social Security: The Phony Crisis (University of Chicago Press, 2000), and has written numerous research papers on economic policy. He is also president of Just Foreign Policy.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
it certaitainly is frustrating that offshore drilling argument
Posted by: whealeydj on Aug 1, 2008 5:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
by Republics is working but the Democrats could not get White House to bring some immediate relief on prices by releasing 10 per cent of strategic oil reserve. you can fool some of the people all of the time, but i dont know why so many people beleive that drilling will work but conservation wont.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

where are the bold discussions?
Posted by: phoolish on Aug 3, 2008 10:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We already have so many solutions out there but the masses don't hear about them. Investments in mass transport, solar outfits for home owners (what's left of them), community markets, conservation, changes in urban/suburban planning...while the earth heats up the politicians are quibbling about drilling for the last little pockets of oil? What's happened to sanity?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I've been advocating "green solutions" for a long time.
Posted by: yellow on Aug 7, 2008 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One solution to the current crisis of chronic stagnation is what is aptly termed "green solutions." These are environmental sound, energy saving, community based, labor intensive ways to create full employment while saving scarce energy resources and decentralizing the economy at the same time. The overall impact would be to shift income downwards to local communities and working people while democratizing the society.

This is an absolutely necessary idea for progressive change and should be part of any progressive political agenda. The main obsticles are, of course, corporate resistance to any impingement on their control of the system and private profits.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Seems like a No brainer?
Posted by: TonyGottlieb on Aug 10, 2008 9:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Using federal tax credits to simultaneously stimulate alternative energy and construction ?

While it seems like a no brainer, apparently it does requires a brain to understand there is little or no downside to this plan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Brainer....End Inc Ownership of all Energy Resources
Posted by: Purple Girl on Aug 17, 2008 6:01 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this debate is flawed at its very core..If Off shore drilling begins, WE will not own that Oil EITHER!
WE do NOT have a 'Ministry of Energy', we have private profiteers who have held our resources (and our country) Hostage for nearly a century.
It is not foreign Oil we need to get OFF- it's scam artists who have stolen OUR rights to the oil (energy) which is OUR countries Asset!
So when they Speak of 'Energy Independence' unless they are talking about revoking leases and seizing back OUR natural resources as a National Treasure, They are full of shit!
This includes the ability to generate and dispense energy by means of Solar & Wind Too!
Energy is what powers our economy, feeds our people, warms our homes..Not a commodity which can be controlled by Profiteers!
Two best ways to have a healthy nation-
Universal Health care and Nationally owned energy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement