Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Living Without a Car: My New American Responsibility

By Andrew Lam, New America Media. Posted July 24, 2008.


Giving up a car isn't easy -- even amid the gas crisis. But the covetous American way of life has become unsustainable.
Advertisement

SAN FRANCISCO -- For the first time in nearly two decades, I am no longer a driver. A few months ago, facing spiking gas prices and much-needed repairs, I donated my car to an organization that takes care of foster kids.

It's an odd feeling to be on this side of being green. Without a car, my sense of time and space have been immediately altered. What was once a matter of expediency is now an effortful navigation.

"I'll be there in 15 minutes!" I used to tell a good friend who once lived nearby but who now resides, without a car, at an inconvenient distance. Going to my favorite Asian food market suddenly has turned into another arduous chore: Once a 30 minute event, it has become a two-hour ordeal, with bags in hands, and bus transfers.

Owning a car has always been a luxury in the Third World, something beyond the pale of the middle class. In countries like Vietnam, Peru and Bangladesh, just to name a few, only the very rich owned cars. When I came here from Vietnam with my family at the end of the war, I remember such delight when my older brother bought his first car. We were still sharing an apartment with my aunt and her children, but as we cruised the streets at night, it felt as if we were becoming Americans.

The automobile, after all, is intrinsically American, and owning one largely determines how we Americans arrange our daily lives -- it is as essential to us as the train and metro are to Japanese or Europeans. Indeed, a car is the first thing a teenager of driving age desires; to drive away from home is an established American rite of passage. Even the working poor are drivers here.

For immigrants, the car is the first thing we buy before the house. Vietnamese in Vietnam marvel at the BMWs and Mercedez Benzes that their relatives drive in America, and no doubt the sleek photos sent home cause many to dream of a life of luxury in the United States.

It seems a natural progression that the housing crisis should quickly lend itself to a car crisis. Both were readily available at one time, with easy loans and cheap gas. But now, with skyrocketing gas prices and faltering mortgages, many have had to give up one in order to keep the other.

Not surprisingly, the car is often the last thing that downtrodden Americans let go. "I can see losing my house, but I can't imagine losing my van," one unemployed friend told me. "I can live in my van. But not being able to get where I need to go would be worse than not having a house."

Mobility defines us far more than sedentary life, thus the car is arguably more important than the house. Americans, despite accepting global warming as de facto, are still very much in love with the automobile. On average, we own 2.28 vehicles per household.

Our addiction to the automobile is as much a symptom of our nomadic culture as it is a matter of necessity: Urban sprawl, combined with little public transportation, makes the car essential. A job seems almost always to require it. The distance between here and there is daunting without a vehicle at one's command.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: climate change, gas prices, cars, oil prices, housing crisis, automobiles, american lifestyles, driving

Andrew Lam is the author of Perfume Dreams: Reflections on the Vietnamese Diaspora.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Folding bikes
Posted by: aouie01 on Jul 24, 2008 12:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A good addition to the mediocre public transport systems like in Los Angeles, would be folding bikes. You can look at Citizen Bike for an inexpensive example (haven't tried their bike though (only tried a big folding bike from Dahon that is good to put in the trunk but not to carry around in public transit)). If you live and work within a few miles of train connections, then trains plus bikes could mean faster commute times (during rush hour) in places like Los Angeles.
Sincerely,
Aouie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Car sharing
Posted by: aouie01 on Jul 24, 2008 1:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another option is to share cars. An example for San Francisco. This may be adequate for most people, but of course people are unlikely to be ready to settle for it as yet. Maybe at least share one car per house for the side benefit of having more parking spaces in cities (till they build more multi-story buildings and crowd up the cities even more).
Sincerely,
Aouie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My Life Without A Car...
Posted by: Lily H. on Jul 24, 2008 2:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...began way before it was fashionable. I drove an
15-year-old American-made vehicle for six years before
it finally gave up the ghost on a Christmas family outing the same weekend Sonny Bono and Michael Kennedy were both killed on the ski slopes (odd reference, I know).

Since then, my children and I were no longer able to take drives to our favorite country spots away from
the city, and grocery shopping became a new challenge.
I'd recently transferred my youngest to a new school
which I'd only visited a hand-ful of times due to its considerable distance from our home and NO bus service
there.

As a working poor head-of-household, I was able to keep a car running, roadworthy and insured, but no
dice on being able to buy another once it was lost.
Years came and went, my children grew to adulthood,
and I skipped the "teen driver" stage altogether.

Until recently, one of my current fantasies had been
getting a car and getting some of the freedoms I'd
lost so many years ago. Now with gas prices through
the stratosphere, the fantasy is fading fast.

There are times when I am bored out of my wits with
the small circle I travel by bus (luckily in a decent
neighborhood with several close bus routes) and wish
I could hop in a car and drive somewhere, anywhere
to "get away from it all". Ironically, I just helped
my daughter get her drivers' license, using one of
her friends' cars to take the test, which I had to
drive her to the DMV. For a too-brief time, I had
the rush of the sensation of being behind the wheel,
feeling "one with the machine". It ended all too
quickly, though. Now as an empty-nester, I'm resigned
to my two-wheel rolling cart as my "trunk" and my
trusty disabled bus pass as my "car". As the phrase
goes, "Those were the days..."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Either/Or
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jul 24, 2008 3:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sure this article has good intentions, but the negative tone reflects American consumer attitudes.

Being entirely without a car is limiting. But riding a train, bus, or bike can be a nice adventure, and a nice break from traffic, road rage, and spending half of your paycheck at the gas station.

The article speaks in terms of either/or, which simple-minded American consumers seem to be good at. Why not ride your bike and take the train when you can, and keep your car for when you really need it? Who says you have to give your car away and walk around in homemade sandals?

From my reading, our public trans. infrastructure is inferior to those in Europe and other countries. Even so, a lot of us have options we're not using, because we're too fat, lazy, and addicted to our cars. Plus, I think a lot of Americans are insecure, and don't want their friends to see them riding the bus, or a bike, or lugging around a backpack.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Spot on! Posted by: gnaw_bone
» RE: Spot on! Posted by: jroth420
» RE: Spot on! Posted by: Old Me
» RE: Spot on! Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Either/Or Posted by: war_on_tara
» RE: ither/Or Posted by: Knot_Rich
» I hope you're right! Posted by: vangogh69
» RE: ither/Or Posted by: Tokyo Tuds
where you live...
Posted by: Moira61 on Jul 24, 2008 3:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
makes all the difference. My car is about to give up the ghost - if it were a person it would be in hospice. I live in a small town in Ohio, with no public transportation and the largest grocery store over 10 miles away and on a curvy road without a shoulder to walk or ride a bike on. I also have a 13 year old son that I need to take to dental appointments - and what if he gets sick at school and needs me to come get him, or he misses the bus (he better not, but he's still a kid)? I wonder what I'm really going to do when the car finally quits - I really don't want to buy another, but I don't see NOT having to get one. I'd love to have a car share program nearby - that would be ideal but alas, it's not in the cards. I think a lot of people would give up their car if they lived in a city like the author, granted it's a hassle to give up the wheels, but you can still get around pretty easily.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: where you live... Posted by: Basenjis
I still have nightmares about driving after more than 20 wonderful car-free years
Posted by: Suzon on Jul 24, 2008 4:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't miss for a minute breathing carbon monoxide in underground car parks, having to worry about running out of gas, starting up on cold mornings, making insurance payments, getting repairs done or the brakes not working in an emergency. Yes, there were times when driving was pure pleasure. But that Master of the Universe buzz can all too suddenly turn into a horrendous flesh-and-bone-rending crash. It will be another three months before my former daughter-in-law can get out of her hospital bed and then she will have to decide whether or not to have risky back surgery.

Being car-free saves me money every day. How many hours do you have to work each year to support a vehicle which might get you killed or maimed?

Of course cars can be very useful and in some cases necessary, but I much prefer being a contented pedestrian who sometimes takes a taxi, bus or train ride. I like the sun on my face, the wind and even the rain in my hair. I like looking into gardens and the windows of people's houses. I like saying hello to cats. I like hearing the birds sing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I, For One, Don't Need To Be Carried
Posted by: smunslow on Jul 24, 2008 4:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I gave my car away four years ago and have loved every minute of it ... despite that I live in Coventry, RI, one of the least pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly suburbs imaginable.

I love the freedom, the $8,000 I save every year, the exercise, and, when I ride the bus, the time I save. Time on a bus is time you can use. You can read, write, work on a laptop, relax, even catch up on sleep. No time wasted in traffic jams, no time looking for a parking spot, no time filling up on $4.00 gas.

When others ask me why I live car-free, I have various answers, depending on the situation. "I'm not going to contribute unnecessarily to the destruction of the planet that my three daughters will be inheriting." or: "I enjoy the exercise." or: "I enjoy the freedom of not having to lug 4000 pounds of machinery around everywhere I go." But the answer that works best is: "I don't need to be carried everywhere. I'm not a baby. I'm not disabled. I have legs and they work great. Sure, I take the bus sometimes, but it's a choice I make. I'm not dependent on it."

You would be amazed how easy and rewarding it is to divorce your car and regain a sense of autonomy in your mobility. Yes, it requires some sacrifice. Yes, you have to think a bit and not just reach for your keys everytime you want to go somewhere.

And yes, you need to develop a new mindset, one that says, "My self-esteem is sufficient that I don't need the pseudo-esteem provided by the owning of a machine that operates at the cutting edge of 1880s-era technology, destroys the environment, forces me to feel disconnected from my community, makes me feel lazy and unable to move my own body, sucks my hard-earned dollars away by the thousands. I want freedom from fossil-fuel addiction, freedom from the guilt associated with the continuation of a behavior that is destroying the environment and sending soldiers to die in the desert so that I can maintain my addiction without impediment."

Be bold. Be daring. Be autonomous. Be responsible. Be energized. Be free. It feels great!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thanks. great comment. Posted by: Beck
» RE: I, For One, Don't Need To Be Carried Posted by: beautifulady2003
» you missed my point Posted by: bizeeb
I am lucky
Posted by: rosweed on Jul 24, 2008 4:38 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I sold my car just after I moved to New York from San Francisco in 1997. This city has an excellent public transportation system and it's pretty easy for me to get around. My wife has a company car, so that makes it convenient for grocery shopping. If we didn't have that benefit then I'd take a cab. Carrying anything up and down the steps of the subway system is not an easy task. I feel for people like Moira61. Until we get serious about providing a workable public transportation system for everyone, the car is not going away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I am lucky Posted by: mnstra
Excuse me but uh most of America is nowhere near San Francisco's.
Posted by: jwverez on Jul 24, 2008 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Public transportation is usually expensive thanks to privatizing it, people's offices are often more than 10 miles away from their residences, and it's not as if the wimpy Democrats and the rubberstamp zombie GOP are gonna do anything to match let alone beat Europe's transportation infrastructure.

Besides, with LS9 inventing ways to generate light sweet crude oil from bugs (can you say RENEWABLE PETROLEUM), scientific discoveries of producing light sweet crude oil from algae, switchgrass and hemp proving to substitute for oil, and people cutting back their excess demands and going for fuel efficient vehicles or switching to electric replacements, I have a strong feeling that America ain't gonna give up their cars for the forseeable future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Problems with algae Posted by: Jasonix
» My apologies. Posted by: maxpayne
It's about infrastructure
Posted by: Urstrly on Jul 24, 2008 5:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've always thought we made a huge mistake by abandoning our passenger rail system in this country; even Amtrak must rent rails from freight companies, I learned the last time I took the train. I think we can only go forward and re-imagine some new ways to move people and cargo and how we can supply ourselves locally with the things we need (and do without some things we thought we needed).

Living in NYC, I haven't had a car since 1974, but even here, not everything works smoothly. I can only imagine living in a rural area with children or a disability and no car.

One of the things this energy crisis could teach us if we would own up is that none of us lives outside the interdependent web of life, and the "ownership society" of Republicans is a hoax.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm waiting for the alternative powered vehicle
Posted by: bdcroan on Jul 24, 2008 5:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When my RAV4 was new in 2000, usually I could fill the tank for just $13. The last time I filled it was $55, a 423% increase. Thank you republicans who have brought us to this. Recall that republicans are so concerned about SECURITY, but we had no plan to stop subsidizing terror when buying oil. Dah! So I hope congress sees the light at last. I try and limit my driving so that I buy 1 tank of gas a month, and am waiting for the next generation of car to be born -- green and clean.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He's having trouble because he's trying to duplicate his car life
Posted by: Beck on Jul 24, 2008 5:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you switch to a bike, your life needs to change. You don't stay devoted to faraway stores that take hours of your day to reach. It should rearrange your life. It's made mine easier, not harder. I don't have to remember everything at the store, or combine errands. Riding a bike is a pleasure, and making two trips in a day to nearby places is good, not bad. Going to the store two days in a row, if I forgot something, is not the hassle on a bike it is with a car. Any modern version of doing a task has reduced it to only the accomplishment of the task. But biking or walking has its own reward; it's not just something to get over with.

The point of simplifying one's life and living greener isn't to duplicate the former life. It's to change it and make it easier. If, like this writer, it's "not easy", some further adjustment should happen. We can't do this if it's this hard. I've been surprised at how doable it is, even in a city that is not at all bike-friendly. I thought it would be hard, but didn't find that to be true. I'm surprised at the struggle this writer is having, and at the burdened tone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ok? Where do you live in? Posted by: maxpayne
» Excellent point. Posted by: Artkansas
» it is more than that though... Posted by: itmeantnothing
carless in america...
Posted by: ellie on Jul 24, 2008 5:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
many mass transit systems are cutting back on bus routes due to fuel costs so many people who might have the option to use it are going to be stuck...

many large employers are not on a bus route... the company might have started in an urban area then bought land for a corporate 'campus' out in the middle of no-where, leaving it's urban employees inside the cities...

lack of bike lanes or paths that go anywhere besides around a park...

the list goes on, this is what we get for going to the interstate system instead of a mass transit combo in the 60's-70's... not defending driving but looking at the reality facing this country...

for schools who are already cash strapped around here, they cut out high school school buses and did away with neighborhood high schools years ago where students are assigned to schools all over this fairly large city to to get more of an ethnic mix in the classroom...

kids got a bus pass and now the school system doesn't have the $$ to pay for the passes and the families are going to have to pay for them at a reduced rate (regular monthly pass = $45.00, high school student pass limited to school transport only times = $40.00)... parents who are low income are raising hell because they do not have the extra $$ for the danged pass to keep their kids in school, but the truant officers will still be trolling for truant kids...

this is a mess here in the midwest...

back to coffee...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» a mess here in the midwest Posted by: rosalux
Free at Last
Posted by: beautifulady2003 on Jul 24, 2008 5:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I gave up my car 4 years ago, and most of the time I don't miss it. I ride the bus to and from work (I am fortunate enough to have a good public transportation system where I live and work) for a paltry $66 per month. For other trips, I go with friends or take taxis, which cuts down on the number of unnecessary and unplanned trips. I hate shopping and so I do most of it online. With all the money I've saved, I'm about to take my second vacation outside the country this year. I love the freedom from the expense of owning and driving a car.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Free at Last Posted by: jroth420
» RE: Free at Last Posted by: Stell
» So what city do you live in? Posted by: maxpayne
Europe and Asia didn't change their infrastructure overnight. It took decades.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 24, 2008 5:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, when the price of oil was above $3 a gallon, Europe and Asia prepared alternative transportation options for the public unlike America where people electing pro Big Oil/Auto/Coal pols to sit in as puppets for those interests. Right now, even if gas hits $10 a gallon, America's dependencies on autos and foreign oil won't go down until more people choose to make changes to improve its public transportation infrastructure first on local followed by regional finally on a national level. In most places in this country, public buses and trains are miles out of reach for most people and scheduling is piss poor. And don't go lecturing people about riding their bikes or even walking to work when their home addresses are 20+ miles away. It is going to take at least a decade to improve public transportation. Given the corrupt two party system in Washington that is hostile to public transportation, I strongly suggest you first go LOCAL, build it up on a state level, and then connecting state by state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As I had feared...
Posted by: TagsNOLA on Jul 24, 2008 6:22 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... and as promised by Obama, the next administration will, in terms of the economy, be a reprise of Jimmy ("lowered expectations") Carter.

This whole "greenie" crap is based on inconvenient LIES by that charlatan Al Gore and other creeps of his ilk whose target is exactly the same as the Bush administration and the Carter administration. On one point leaders of the Democrat and Republican parties are in complete accord. They want to destroy the American middle class. It's OK for the elite to have their limo's, mansions, 2nd homes and executive jets. But for the middle class to aspire to a home in the burbs, the freedom of private auto ownership and a few nice extras, well we're just way out of line to want that.

CO2 is NOT a green house gas. That's just a lie. It's a LIE, not a settled issue. Hundreds of scientists have stepped up to the line to refute this lie at great risk to their professional careers. Thousands more have been cowed into silence for fear of being blacklisted for "scientific heresy."

Citizens who willingly buy off on this kind of step backwards, giving up their cars, are no better than lemmings, marching into the sea. The bastards who are preaching that we should learn to live with less have no intention of joining us in our privations. They'll just setup corporations and buy "carbon credits" from themselves.

Short term, we need to drill for oil, not in those areas where we are allowed. There is NO FREAKING OIL THERE. We need to drill offshore and in ANWR, NOW! We could get at that oil much faster than 10 years if we wanted to. This country rebounded from Pearl Harbor to the deck of USS Missourri in Tokyo Bay in 3 years and 10 months! Don't tell me it takes 10 years to bring an oil field into production.

Medium term, we need nukes and long term, we need massive funding of fusion energy research along with strong incentives for US auto manufacturers to develop better and more reasonably priced hybrids.

The governor of Montana has proposed an energy plan based on hybrid autos. He observed that most of our driving is less than 40 miles a day, not enough for the internal combustion engine to be needed. The car would be plugged in during the evenings. Any residual charge remaining in the battery would drain into the electricity grid and the local electric utility would be REQUIRED to buy it back at peak energy rates. Then at 2:00 am or there about, The connection would reverse and recharge the battery in the car when energy demand and energy RATES are lowest.

Near, medium and long term solutions ARE available to reduce our citizens' energy costs, but they would not substantially diminish the living standards of the US middle class and so they are out of bounds unless more of our citizens decide to stop drinking the coolade and demand policies that truly serve the general welfare.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: As I had feared... Posted by: phatkhat
» RE: As I had feared... Posted by: TagsNOLA
» RE: As I had feared... Posted by: abstractedaway
» RE: As I had feared... Posted by: TagsNOLA
» RE: As I had feared... Posted by: abstractedaway
» RE: As I had feared... Posted by: john mont
» RE: As I had feared... Posted by: TagsNOLA
» RE: As I had feared... Posted by: snax
» RE: As I had feared... Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: As I had feared... Posted by: TagsNOLA
» RE: As I had feared... Posted by: TagsNOLA
» RE: Only 10 Months.... Posted by: sasquuatch55
» RE: Only 10 Months.... Posted by: TagsNOLA
» RE: As I had feared... Posted by: peacefullaim
IF you live in a city...
Posted by: phatkhat on Jul 24, 2008 6:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
especially a large city, giving up your car may be doable. But those of us who live in rural areas can't do it. Bikes are not practical on country highways without shoulders and frequented by speeding trucks. (Get right next to a big truck traveling 60 mph, and see how close to a hurricane it feels.)

I'm really glad y'all can pat yourselves on the back about how green you are, and how EVERYONE needs to be just like you. Well, maxpayne said, it ain't gonna happen overnight. Until we catch up with the Asians and Europeans on public transport, using cars will continue.

Also consider scale. European and Asian countries (China excluded) are small, and the people are concentrated in and around towns and cities, due to greenbelt ordinances. Good for public transport, but the people who DO live in the country have cars, for sure.

If anyone loves cars more than Americans, it is - GASP!!! - the Germans. Yes, those pioneers of green LOVE cars, and most of them own one. Somehow, their auto manufacturers know how to get great performance out of 4-cylinders, and great fuel economy to boot. Of course, THEY have been paying way more than us for petrol for decades.

I drive an 11-year-old Nissan pickup, and like someone else said, went from the $13 fillup to the $55 fillup, and try to make a tank last all month. I live 5 miles from town (no, I can't walk that far, I'm 60 and have arthritis), and try to consolidate my errands. I have a house under 1,000 sq. ft., and basically live frugally, shopping at thrift stores, donating my aluminum to the animal shelter, and recycling as much as possible.

I, too, buy online instead of going to the city to shop (all we have here is WalMart), or have local shops order things for me. I buy and sell on eBay, which turns out to be similar to barter: I get rid of my stuff and get someone else's, LOL.

We all have to decide for ourselves at what level of green we can function. Obviously the great guru Gore can't function at the level I do. His carbon footprint is a whole lot bigger than mine is, and until HE is willing to downsize and walk the talk, he can STFU as far as I'm concerned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Most people do live in cities. Posted by: Artkansas
so...what about us in the rural areas?
Posted by: zooeyhall on Jul 24, 2008 6:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I truly think the vast majority of Alternet's readers live on either the east or the west coasts, and seem to assume the that vast space in between is inhabited by some quaint aborigines--happily frolicking among the cornfields.

I live in rural Nebraska where I farm the farm my Dad moved to in 1940. My local town is 444 people (down from 550 ten years ago). We have no grocery store and only a quik-mart/gas station (where you pay $6 for a gallon of milk). It is 40 miles to the nearest GP physician and county hospital. There is no hardware store or building supply store in my town. No pharmacy.

People who write these articles--and many of the posters--who blithely say that you can live without a car don't have a CLUE about life in rural America! But worse then the ignorance is an elitist attitude that underlies their view of rural people and rural America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You cannot be serious Posted by: TennMom
» RE: You cannot be serious Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» Understanding Systemic Problems Posted by: bingahaba
» Durring the depression.. Posted by: abrunvand
Capitulation
Posted by: corgyn on Jul 24, 2008 6:57 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To surrender the American Way of independence, mobility and self-determination is to surrender personal transportation in favor of the communitarian submission to the soul-draining life of a public transit peon. Shoot me before I have a bus pass.
Human power [peddle bikes] as a serious component of a AMERICAN transportation system is simply laughable. Portland, OR, sure. Summer in Houston, winter in Denver. 99.5% of Americans are not going to ride a bike to work. I bet in the million plus people in Bexar County Texas [San Antonio] you couldn't find 100 bike commuters on most days. Oh you see the colorful spandex crowd in the suburbs at sunset & weekends but that's not transportation, it's recreation.

New engines, fuel sources, even shared but self-driven auto schemes - but buses and commuter trains NO WAY

The auto industry is still a big part of the economy. A fast track to recovery is a Gov't supported trade-in plan where the loss of "book" value in a V8 SUV is compensated when a US-made econo car is purchased. The Gov't could buy up SUVs and modify the nation's fleet fuel efficiency. There's serious savings in the amount of imported oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Capitulation & SUVs Posted by: boing007
» RE: Capitulation & SUVs Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» RE: Capitulation Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: Capitulation Posted by: corgyn
» RE: Capitulation Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: Capitulation Posted by: mnstra
Cold Turkey
Posted by: mikehattan on Jul 24, 2008 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No need to go cold turkey at this point. If you were in Vietnam or any Asian or European city for that matter,surely you must have had either a mobylette or a scooter like thousands of others. Why not just downsize to a scooter? I recently bought a Wildfire scooter just for nipping around town and I get 100 mpg and the thrill of being out in the sun and smelling the country road scents is an experience that one just doesn't get in a car. I am able to say Hi to people that I pass on the street in town and see more because one sits higher than almost at ground level like in some cars. I can heartily recommend scooter travel. It definitely is the way to go until we find a viable alternative to fossil fuels. Mike.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cars and Big Oil
Posted by: boing007 on Jul 24, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can anyone tell me why Enron and the others won't drill on all they land they own? Is it because there is no oil there? And if that is true are the oil companies getting tax breaks just because they own this land and are not exploiting it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Cars and Big Oil Posted by: sasquuatch55
What About Semi Trucks
Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals on Jul 24, 2008 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unless Best Buy is delivering your Flat Screen on a yak power cart or Canal use is all of a sudden regenerated, I think I'll stick with my Chevy. Most people tend to forget how things get from point A to point B to your store front and home. You guys can go live like its the 19th century. I think I'll be like Asia and just keep growing "smartly"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Similar to AlterNet's vegetarian writers
Posted by: war_on_tara on Jul 24, 2008 7:57 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can't help but notice how similar this article is in tone to all the pro-veg preaching here. There is rarely (or never?) an article urging LESS meat-eating - it's always presented as an either/or.

I'm in a Boston suburb and don't own a car either, and eat meat maybe 2 or 3 days a week. But I realize that the number of people who are likely to give up cars entirely, or give up meat entirely, is pretty small!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Car Free For Over 3 Years
Posted by: Gravitas on Jul 24, 2008 8:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I made a choice to give up my car 3 years ago. The only real personal benefit is that it allowed me to save money. Otherwise I find it living hell. Taking public transportation in Chicago means being crammed on an unreliable el or bus with blasting I-Pods, cell phone yakers and gum chompers. (I have never heard anyone chomp and crack gum as loudly as Chitown.) And I can't forget the smokers who choose to light up in crowded bus shelter rather than go a few feet down. It doesn't have to be that way. My Amtrak ride up to Milwaukee was bliss. They have a quiet car. Maybe if people learned two cents worth of manners the ride would be more tolerable!

I do think he is on to something though, in that cars represent independence. As I sit in the el terminals I notice that no matter how high the price of gas, people still commute by themselves. One woman told me her car was the only time she got to be alone. Truly, it is hard to be alone in a city as big as Chicago. If they give up their cars, some new social institution to provide solitude will have to take its place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This topic is going to become more and more popular
Posted by: Stell on Jul 24, 2008 8:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Around water coolers, at family dinners, in bars.

Those of us who live in urban areas and can reasonably do without a car, or at least drastically cut down on our driving (if we are lucky enough to be able to afford the registration, insurance, and maintenance), for instance, for out of town trips only, have an obligation to do so.

This discussion does NOT have to become one of lucky urbanites lecturing everyone else about the immorality of their "lifestyle choices", ho