Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Appalachian Residents Have Found the Antidote to Coal

By Jeff Biggers, Huffington Post. Posted July 9, 2008.


Faced with an impending proposal to stripmine over 6,600 acres, local residents have come up with a better idea.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

If Senator Barack Obama ever needs a living symbol of change we can believe in, and a hopeful way to transcend the dirty politics of our failed energy policies, he should go and see the future of renewable energy in the Coal River Valley in West Virginia.

Yes, renewable energy in Appalachia.

Something historic is taking place in West Virginia this summer. Faced with an impending proposal to stripmine over 6,600 acres -- nearly 10 square miles -- in the Coal River Valley, including one of the last great mountains in that range, an extraordinary movement of local residents and coal mining families have come up with a counter proposal for an even more effective wind farm.

Mother Jones, the miners' angel, once declared: "Pray for the dead, and fight like hell for the living."

Having witnessed the destruction of over 470 mountains and their adjacent communities in Appalachia, the Coal River Valley citizens are doing just that. On the frontlines of one of the most tragic environmental and human rights scandals in modern American history, the community-wide Coal River wind advocates have devised a blueprint to get beyond the divisive regional politics and break the stranglehold of King Coal on the central Appalachian economies.

The Coal River Wind Project is the first bottom-up community-based full scale assessment to directly counter the nightmare of mountaintop removal with a renewable energy and economy alternative prior to the actual mining.

We have a choice. It is not simply coal or no coal. Jobs or no jobs. The issue is how do we create jobs and clean energy forever, and begin the transition in Appalachia and America away from dirty coal.

And Barack Obama, and all Americans, have a chance to be part of Coal River Valley's landmark decision for our nation's dependence on renewable or nonrenewable energy sources. Either we continue to hand out permits for mountaintop removal (two permits in this area have already been granted), unleashing millions of tons of explosives, blasting local communities to Kingdom Come, provide less than 200 jobs for 14 years of coal mining, contributing the dirty coal firepower for continued carbon dioxide emissions and global warming, or, we can stake out a third way in renewable energy and economic development.

Consider this: The Coal River Mountain Wind Project would:


  • Create 200 local employment opportunities during construction, and 50 permanent jobs during the life of the wind farm. It takes only 35 years for a wind farm to provide a greater number of one-year jobs than the proposed four surface mines combined.


  • Provide 440MW or enough energy for 150,000 homes -- indefinitely, as well as a sustained tax income that could be used for the construction of new schools for the county.


  • Allow for concurrent uses of the mountain, including harvesting of wild ginseng and valuable forest plants, sustainable forestry, and mountain tourism, as Coal River Mountain is one of West Virginia's finest mountains.


  • Preserve the historic Coal River Mountain heritage, and protect the land and communities from blasting, dusting, poisonous drinking water, increased flooding, damaged homes and personal property, and devastated wildlife habitat.


In 1892, in Barack Obama's adopted city, the Chicago Tribune wrote in an editorial: "How long can the earth sustain life," if we depend on the "wonderful power of coal?" The Tribune editors lambasted Americans for our lack of vision and our lack of energy conservation, and our need to "invent appliances to exhaust with over greater rapidity the hoard of coal." They declared:
Doubtless the end of the coal, at least as an article of a mighty commerce, will arrive within a period brief in comparison with the ages of human existence. In the history of humanity, from first to last, the few centuries through which we are now passing will stand out prominently as the coal-burning period.
The Tribune editors in 1892 assumed Americans would move beyond coal and onto renewable energy sources.

We may be a hundred years late, but the realities of global warming and climate change, and the brutal process of extracting coal, should remind us that it is not too late for Barack Obama and the rest of the nation to be a part of this exciting new energy future for Appalachia, and the entire country.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: coal, wind, mining, appalachia, mountain top removing

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
you can help!
Posted by: mwildfire on Jul 9, 2008 6:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Help make this happen by signing the petition at www.coalriverwind.org. You can sign as an individual, or get your organization to sign.
And here's another idea--if you just got a "stimulus" check from the government, send it to the organizations you know that are working to save the earth, stop war or reduce injustice. That's what I'm doing with mine, and one place I'm sending a check to is the Coal River Mountain Wind Project. The symbolism of this transition is enormous, both because of the name and because of the location, in the heart of West Virginia coal country where King Coal rules and people are fighting desperate battles to stop their homeplaces from being literally blown up. But there isn't much time--two of the permits have already been granted. The group needs to get economic studies done yesterday to convince the landowner--a corporation--that switching to the wind farm wouldn't be a big economic loss.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is why we lose as environmentalists
Posted by: rickiey on Jul 10, 2008 4:50 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because we sound like idiots. I mean, really, when making the case for a wind farm instead of more polluting coal, are we really going to give "Harvesting of wild ginseng" as one of the reasons to go forward with it?

No one is going to take us seriously. I actually CARE and I laughed when I read that part.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Being from West Virginia myself
Posted by: tRANIS on Jul 10, 2008 5:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you have ever seen what happens in mountaintop removal then you know just how bad it is. I'm glad WV is standing up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Being from West Virginia myself Posted by: ChairmanMetal
» Mountaintop removal images Posted by: fanny666
Coal is worse than you think.
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Jul 10, 2008 7:31 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Coal is mostly carbon, but the complete list of impurities in coal
includes every element in the periodic table. The important
impurities are: URANIUM, ARSENIC, LEAD, MERCURY,
Antimony, Cobalt, Nickel, Copper, Selenium, Barium, Fluorine,
Silver, Beryllium, Iron, Sulfur, Boron, Titanium, Cadmium,
Magnesium, Thorium, Calcium, Manganese, Vanadium, Chlorine,
Aluminum, Chromium, Molybdenum and Zinc. There is so much
of these elements in coal that cinders and coal smoke are actually
valuable ores. We should be able to get all the uranium and
thorium we need to fuel nuclear power plants for centuries by
using cinders and smoke as ore. Remember that, to get a given
amount of energy, you need about 100 MILLION TIMES as much
coal as uranium. That means the coal mine has to be 100 million
times larger than the uranium mine, not counting the recycling of
nuclear fuel. We can keep our mountains and forests and our
health by switching from coal to nuclear power.

On the order of a Million Chinese die each year because of coal
smoke. Chinese industrial grade coal contains large amounts of
arsenic. Chinese industrial grade coal is sometimes stolen by
peasants for cooking. The result is that the whole family
dies of arsenic poisoning.

I have zero financial interest in nuclear power, and I never have
had a financial interest in nuclear power. My sole motivation in
writing this is to avoid death by H2S gas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I hope the wind blows steadily at mountaintops there.
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Jul 10, 2008 8:47 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wind energy requires that Direct Current [DC] be transmitted
over enormous areas [more than one continent] to provide
continuous power because wind varies from minute to minute.
Direct current is required because the voltage and frequency of
AC would change minute by minute with wind speed. Long
distance DC transmission requires superconducting cable. DC
just doesn't go far otherwise.
Reference:
http://www.terrawatts.com: Liquid nitrogen is still required.
http://www.alternet.org/environment/69888

Following the http://www.terrawatts.com lead, you arrive at the
statement that the "high temperature" superconductor will be
cooled by liquid nitrogen. See:
http://www.azom.com/details.asp?
ArticleID=942#_When_will_HTS
The need for liquid nitrogen or liquid helium is the Achilles heal
of this scheme. It isn't really a "room" temperature
superconductor. Any accidental warming brings the grid to a
halt. Energy is required to make liquid nitrogen. Dry nitrogen
must be cooled to 77 degrees Kelvin to make it a liquid. [Zero
degrees Kelvin is absolute zero, -273.15 degrees Centigrade.]
Liquid helium is at 4 degrees Kelvin or colder. Superconduction
usually means a requirement for liquid helium. Liquid Helium is
very expensive. The cable has to be thermally insulated and
cooled its entire length. The cable also must be physically
separated into "out" and "return" wires, and the force between the
2 wires will be large. As stated in the article I gave you the URL
of, it won't be cheap.

Any warming above the superconducting temperature or too much
magnetic field will cause the cable to quit superconducting at that
point. The cable will instantly melt, creating an electric arc. All
of the energy that was flowing through that spot will instead be
dumped there, creating an explosion. The power grid will be
disabled for some time since repairing a superconducting cable is
not as easy as splicing a wire. Is this the kind of electric service
you really want? We really don't have the technology yet.

What about storing wind energy as compressed air? Check the
efficiency, the availability of leak proof caverns, etc. Storing
wind energy as compressed air is a pie in the sky. What about
storing wind energy in batteries? We can't make that many
batteries. Another pie in the sky.

Wind energy wastes energy because the wind varies so much that
a "spinning reserve" is required in most locations. If you are
running the steam powered generator at the spinning reserve rate,
you may as well use the steam as your energy source and forget
about the wind. Wind turbines are decorations, not sources of
energy for the grid until we have room temperature
superconductors. There are special locations and circumstances
where wind energy is useful, but wind cannot replace coal and
nuclear any time soon. Nuclear power is the only kind that can
actually take coal fired power plants off line. If allowed to
compete, nuclear power would already have replaced coal fired
power because nuclear is 30% cheaper and 24000 American lives
per year safer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Have you heard of alternators? Posted by: oregoncharles
You GO West Virginia
Posted by: SackofWoe0 on Jul 15, 2008 12:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a coal miner's daughter and I support your efforts 100% When this Bush administration finally leaves, the traitors to all Americans, perhaps the Congress will have enough Balls to do the right thing by and for the people who elected them in the first place. Good luck in all of your endeavors and may there always be a mountaintop to view and to climb and sit on, now that is a very peaceful scene.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

From a distance
Posted by: hilly7 on Jul 15, 2008 8:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sorry, but I've long quit believeing there is a difference in Republicans and Democrats, or for that matter, anybody in Washington, DC is an American holding office. Obama, McCain, Hillary, there all are tied to the same leash, bankers and corporations.

One of the biggest financiers of Mountain Top removal is Wells Fargo. Its funny, we think we are fighting the evil, yet invest or do business with evil. Perhaps the term nothing personal was invented just for that reason, so we wouldn't feel guilty about doing business with them, which actually finances them.

Divinely inspired, or a road map from past survivors, or foretold plans by elite, the Bible once again comes to mind, not that I'm all that religious. The mountains crumbling into the seas, I distinctly remember. It just didn't say how, but that mountains would dissappear, and that is happening.

Ever given thought to what that will do? Mercury is released from coal burning, human and other mamals have zero tolerance to Mercury. 1 new light bulb (CFL) can taint 6,000 gallons of water. The wind, with no barrier will speed up to tremendous speeds. Sound stupid, check out flat areas and their wind speeds. This of course will dry land quicker, thus deserts. None of this is hidden.

Obama and Clinton both are backed heavily by Nucleur corporations. Want to be part of a death, global genocide, just invest in these things. You will make money that your children, maybe even yourself, will never live to spend.

If Obama, Clinton, Gore, Bush, Kerry, and McCain are the best our country has to offer, we need to go ahead and pick out our coffins, because we are not going to last long.

Like our neighbor who said he planted only non GM seeds, but used a petro based chemical fertilizer and pesticides to grow it. Talk about stupid! Then chanted to me about the 2 parties, like there is a difference. It is past time to wake up, or else sleep forever. It is also time to grow-up, ask yourself when researching, who benefits? Is there an agenda behind what you are reading?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anyone that thinks...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Jul 16, 2008 6:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...Obama will have an answer to our energy problems is pissing into the wind.

He is a corporate whore, just not as bad as Hillary.

Vote third party this time to show the Democraps that they do not have a corner on the progressive vote.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wind Energy Would Take Off If Only...............
Posted by: PeaceThinkTank.org on Aug 6, 2008 12:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cannot sign up for green power as my utility company has me locked up tight, with no way out. Most states are like this. It is part of the problem, because consumers cannot even choose green power if they want it. We need to deregulate all states nationwide.

As more states deregulate, more people will have the DIRECT power to choose 100% green energy, from a competitive source..

Currently only Texas and New York are fully deregulated and offer at least some of their citizens a choice of where to buy their energy, including the choice to buy 100% green, renewable energy.

For a free electric rate comparison and to find a 100% green energy source in Texas and New York, go to;

http://www.aaagreenenergy.com

You should find savings of 4-28% from your present utility bill.

New customers also get a free vacation for switching, and travel miles that add up to more vacations, just for using electricity that you already use.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement