Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

China Could Rebuild Earthquake-Damaged Wenchuan as a Model 21st Century Eco-City

By Emanuel Pastreich and John Feffer, Foreign Policy in Focus. Posted June 16, 2008.


It would be the diametric opposite of 'disaster capitalism.'
Advertisement

A devastating earthquake leveled the Chinese town of Wenchuan, leaving in its wake over 60,000 dead and five million homeless throughout Sichuan Province. It will take years to heal the damage of this tragedy. Nevertheless, even as aid organizations and local government scramble to erect temporary housing and supply drinking water, it's important to step back and consider how the international community can properly contribute long after the last rescue crew has left.

First of all, today's China is a very different place than the country that suffered a major earthquake 30 years ago. In 1976, China was largely closed to the world, despite an incipient rapprochement with the United States. As Wenran Jiang notes, China has opened itself up to the world, accepting international rescue and medical teams to an unprecedented degree. "But for a tectonic shift to occur in the world's perception of China as a new kind of superpower," he writes, "Beijing needs to do more than demonstrate that its crisis management is better than Burma's or that post-earthquake Sichuan is no post-Katrina New Orleans."

One way for China to prove that it is a new kind of superpower is to do something that goes beyond simply rebuilding Wenchuan. It can make a virtue out of necessity and, with outside assistance, leapfrog over existing technologies to create a new kind of city.

Such a transformation in the face of adversity is not unique. For instance, the Lisbon earthquake of 1755 killed a similar number of people. That tragedy led to the development of the science of seismology. King Joseph of Portugal rebuilt Lisbon as a grand city boasting the first buildings with earthquake-resistant designs. Lisbon's Pombaline district from that era of regeneration remains a tourist attraction today.

China can do Portugal one better. With international help, it can rebuild Wenchuan as an eco-city of energy efficiency and Green common sense that can inspire the world -- a Gaviotas for the 21st century. Such an eco-city can be a model of sustainable development that points beyond the contradictions of economic growth based on energy consumption. Wenchuan could draw admirers just as Curitiba in Brazil does for its excellent public transportation and environmental urban planning. Such a tribute to the earthquake's victims, by implementing solutions that can save the planet, would be more fitting than any plaque or monument.

China has already shown itself to be open to the establishment of eco-cities. Dongtan island, near Shanghai, is an ambitious effort to create a next-generation low-energy-consumption community powered by sustainable energy and organized by the Shanghai Industrial Investment Corporation. Built by the global engineering firm ARUP, Dongtan will feature extensive local organic farming that will make it food self-sufficient. Its public transportation will be powered by hydrogen fuel cells, and its carbon footprint will be virtually nonexistent. By doing something similar inland, China can transform not only how it approaches the environment but, because of how important China is to the global picture, how the world deals with climate change.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: china, environment, sustainability

Emanuel Pastreich is the director of the Asia Institute at the SolBridge School of Business in Daejeon, South Korea. He is a senior fellow at the US-Japan-China Comparative Policy Research Institute (CPRI), a founding member of the Daejeon Ecology Forum, and a contributor to Foreign Policy In Focus. John Feffer is the co-director of Foreign Policy In Focus (www.fpif.org) at the Institute for Policy Studies (www.ips-dc.org).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Where to start?
Posted by: pangolin on Jun 17, 2008 9:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would say the places to start would be in establishing district geo-exchange systems and a personal-rapid-transit(PRT) system.

Geo-exchange heating and air conditioning is radically more efficient than almost any other system short of super-insulation. Established in networked small districts thermal energy could by stored in the ground in summer and recovered in the winter. Each apartment, house or business would still operate their own heat pump but the overall efficiency would be much greater than stand alone systems.

An overhead rail PRT system could be installed in sections as the city is rebuilt and integrated with buildings and freight systems. Automated delivery of pods of people or freight could almost eliminate the need for street level vehicular traffic. That would leave much more of the streets available with only bicycles, large service vehicles and emergency vehicles left at street level.

As PRT systems are electric and very quiet a massive amount of noise and pollution would be removed from the city. Residents would also be spared the waste of space now used for parking, service and driving cars now.

Of course we should assume that the Chinese would want to integrate solar systems and greenspace wherever possible simply to reduce the load on central power plants and keep the population healthy. That could take forms such as thin film solar walls and green roofs or even the reverse.

Most importantly China should put some serious fear into builders and building inspectors that allow corners to be cut. Some very public demonstrations of what happens to shoddy building standards in other cities should start soon. Cities should not fall down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Or They Could Fall on their Faces
Posted by: billgee on Jun 18, 2008 6:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They may save lives

But only to look good to the world coming to their doorstep

Do you think they really care

Even to their own people

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]