Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Sinking Without Trace: Australia's Unknown Climate Change Victims

Independent UK. Posted May 7, 2008.


The islands of the Torres Strait are slowly being submerged and the plight of their inhabitants is being overlooked.
Advertisement

Ron and Maria Passi, who operate Murray Island's only taxi, were out driving the night the king tide struck. Neighbours flagged them down, asking for help, and so it was not until some time later that they saw their own grandchildren standing in the road. "They were shouting 'Granddad, stop the car, the water is coming in the house,'" says Ron. "I just slammed on the brakes."

The couple's son, Sonny, was outside his fibro shack with his five children, watching the monster surf, lashed by north-west winds, rise ever higher. In the commotion, everyone had forgotten that Sedoi, the baby, was still inside. They heard her crying and found her in her cot, covered in sand. Water had surged in after a wave picked up a big wooden pallet and flung it through the front wall.

No one on Murray had ever seen such a high tide before. Other islands in the Torres Strait, which lies between the far north-eastern tip of the Australian mainland and Papua New Guinea, have witnessed similar scenes in recent years. Houses, roads and graveyards have been flooded, and the locals believe they know the reason: climate change.

The low-lying islands that dot the sparkling waters of this region are facing similar challenges to South Pacific nations such as Kiribati and Tuvalu. But while the plight of those countries is well known and is regularly discussed in the international arena, few people outside Australia have even heard of the Torres Strait. Even Australians would have difficulty locating it on the map, and the remote islands -- accessible only by light plane -- receive few visitors.

Donna Green is one exception. A scientist at the University of New South Wales, English-born Dr. Green is educating the islanders about the possible impacts of climate change and ways in which they can adapt. She embarked on the project after discovering that no one else was doing it. In fact, although the Torres Strait is considered the most vulnerable area of Australia, it is barely on the radar, either as a subject of scientific research or a focus of government policy.

There is no action plan for the region, and the newly formed Department of Climate Change was unable to cite any studies relating to these northerly islands. A search for the words "Torres Strait" on the department's website yields no results.

Until the end of the last Ice Age, the strait was a land bridge connecting northern Australia with New Guinea. Some islands lie only a few miles off the Papua New Guinea coast, and the locals have more in common, ethnically, with the Melanesians of Papua New Guinea than the Aborigines of the Australian mainland. But they consider themselves proud Australians, and feel mildly aggrieved that it is not widely known that Australia has not one, but two indigenous races.

Six of the inhabited Torres islands are low-lying coral cays or swampy mud islands, with little or no elevation. As you fly over them, they look like smudges of green in a shimmering expanse of blue. Others are granite or volcanic, with some higher land. Even there, though, people are accustomed to living by the beach, their days revolving around fishing and collecting shells.

At dusk, walking along the water's edge on Murray Island, the scene is idyllic. A local man is fishing for mackerel with his young son, as shoals of sardines dart along in the shallows. Children play in the sand, and reggae music drifts from one of the simple houses built along the beachfront, in the shade of coconut palms and almond trees.

But, after generations of living by the sea, many locals no longer feel comfortable. Maria Passi says: "At night I can't sleep if the tide is high." Her house was flooded by the king tide as well as her son's. "There was water everywhere, and rubbish floating around, and coconuts under the bed," says her husband Ron, as his wife adds: "When I saw how it looked, I just sat down and cried."

Abnormally high tides are not the only phenomenon that the islanders have observed. The seasons are shifting, and the land is eroding. Birds' migration patterns have altered, and the turtles and dugongs (sea cow) that are traditionally hunted for meat have grown scarce. People are no longer certain when to plant their crops: cassava, yams, sugarcane, bananas, sweet potato.

Murray, home to about 400 people, is the birthplace of indigenous land rights. It was five Murray Islanders, led by Eddie Mabo, who brought a legal action contesting the idea that Australia was uninhabited and belonged to no one when the British arrived. After a landmark High Court decision in 1992, Aborigines and Torres Strait islanders regained ownership of their traditional lands. But now the land for which Mr Mabo fought so long and hard is being swallowed by the sea.

Dr. Green has organised workshops on the islands, offering information and practical advice. She has also held meetings with community elders in order to record their observations of weather patterns and environmental changes, in a project that blends traditional knowledge with Western science.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: climate change, global warming, austrialia, rising seas

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
We told you so
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on May 8, 2008 1:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And Mother Nature is saying it very mildly at the moment. You
don't want to get Mother Nature angry. We MUST stop burning
coal to make electricity by 2015 worldwide. We Must reduce our
CO2 production by 90% by 2050. The survival of Homo Sapiens
as a species is at stake. There is no more time for research or
excuses. Being a scientist, I am always in favor of Research.
Research isn't going to help soon enough.

To stop burning coal to make electricity by 2015 worldwide, there
is only one possibility and it is nuclear. The first electric utility
reactor in the US and world took only 3 years to build. It was
decommissioned after a long and accident free life. The other
sources of energy that don't make CO2 are pies in the sky right
now. Sure, they sound good, but they just aren't going to help
much. Yes, all green energy should be exploited and a
combination is good. But the only BASE LOAD source of
electricity we have right now other than coal is nuclear. Yes, we
get electricity from hydro power, etc., but not enough, not in the
right places, not at all times and not steadily enough. Yes,
geothermal is good, but neither available everywhere nor hazard
free. Etc. Imagine my usual 10 posts below and refrain from
saying something I will have to reply to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We told you so Posted by: richholland
Nobody wants to talk about the basic problem.
Posted by: Last Chance on May 8, 2008 2:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone just assumes we must provide more and more electricity for more and more people onwards forever. So, how many people can the Earth support - 7, 8, 9, 10 billion? Nobody wants to talk about it. They just want more and more of everything - Hopefully

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

going nuke
Posted by: wittler youth on May 8, 2008 11:08 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What will all the coal miners do?..make cars in detroit?..i say why not hemp farms for fuel..its a stinking weed and dosn't need petro-based fertiliser..or massive amounts of water like nuke plants..oh well i guess the most obvious is to stupid to think of.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

" 'But nowadays the weather is unpredictable.' "
Posted by: monkeywrench on May 9, 2008 9:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THIS is the real problem of global warming. Yes, tropical diseases are moving toward the poles; yes, heat waves in Europe killed thousands; yes, desertification is spreading; but unpredictable weather affects negatively our very sustenance, agriculture. No matter how technologically sophiosticated we become, we still have to eat, to grow our food. And, take it from me, the son of a farmer, unpredictable weather makes this very, very hard, if not impossible.

The environmental fabric that supports food production is very fragile -- and we are tearing it, thread-by-thread, every single day that we continue to dump our waste into the atmosphere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]