Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Does It Take a Rocket Scientist to Raise a Child These Days?

By Christopher Gavigan, AlterNet. Posted May 1, 2008.


Protecting your child from harmful consumer products has become almost as time-consuming as raising them.
Advertisement

Parenting used to be simpler. Sure, there have always been emotional struggles and family crises, but the day-to-day logistics of life were quite clear. Here is your layette, here is a crib, babies are breastfed or fed with this bottle with this milk. The choices were simple and unambiguous.

Today, an enormous amount of time (that could be spent actually parenting), is spent wandering the baby product aisles of superstores trying to decide which of the 200 types of bottles available is the best one for your baby. Or which diaper or which pacifier or which bouncy seat or which car seat and on and on and on.

This enormously time-consuming task has only become more difficult with the growing awareness that many of the chemicals used as building blocks for these modern conveniences might not be safe for growing babies. Now we have to consider not only whether our baby will latch on to the bottle we selected, but also whether this bottle will leach suspect chemicals into the milk.

And the scientific discourse in the media is of minimal help at all, but most often adding to your confusion and fear. One article says avoid this chemical at all costs, and the next one says that the science has been blown out of proportion, that the exposures are so small we don't need to worry. Whom do you believe? And if you decide to read the studies yourself, how do you decipher and translate them? It shouldn't take a rocket scientist to raise a child.

In the face of all of this uncertainty, many parents are erring on the side of safety. It's a natural feature of human behavior to act with caution. We do it everyday without even thinking about it. We wear seat belts, we lock doors, we take vitamins, we buy insurance. The list goes on and on. It's built into our cognitive schemas from the day we are born. It's wired into our evolutionary adaptation for survival.

To cope with the uncertainty, here's a modus operandi for millennial parents: Avoid unnecessary exposures (because why take superfluous risks) and buy with the earth in mind (because what's good for the planet is good for our health).

Let's parse these two thoughts for a moment. The reason it's important to avoid unnecessary exposures is because of cumulative and collective impacts. We keep hearing industry say "the exposure is too small to cause any harm," but those tiny exposures are happening constantly throughout our days, and no one's done the research to find out what those combined exposures may do.

Today's babies are being born with over 200 synthetic chemicals in their blood -- chemicals that didn't exist when our grandparents were born. Every day of their lives they are exposed to countless others. Doctors are very careful about prescribing drugs together because of potential unexpected impacts, but we expose our babies to chemical cocktails all of the time. And we don't know what chemicals they are, we don't know how much they're being exposed to and we don't know how they'll interact. In the face of that kind of ignorance, I'll avoid what I can. Thank you very much.

Industry experts also commonly say things like "we've been using this chemical for decades," as if duration implies safety. We used lead in paint and gasoline for a long time, too. We thought drinking alcohol and smoking during pregnancy was OK for a long time. The fact of the matter is that our understanding of toxicology and genetics and science in general grows every year. So, as irritating and confusing as it may be, what may have been considered safe last year, may be found to be unsafe this year. It's called progress and it compels us to be adaptive and to use foresight, which means envisioning potential future problems and then mitigating them. It's that instinctual caution creeping in again. Some call it basic common sense. If there's an inkling of avoidable risk, we can act now instead of waiting decades for the science to ring clear as a bell such as with lead or tobacco. How many people are harmed during the scientific lag time? We need to learn from history instead of repeating it.

Millennial parents want millennial products that prevent harm to health and the environment. Fortunately, buying with the earth and our health in mind is getting easier every day, as the choir of common sense grows louder and louder. People kept demanding it and retailers have responded. Organically grown food is available at almost every major grocery store. National department stores are starting to stock organic cotton clothing, environmentally friendly diapers, nontoxic cleaners, wooden and cloth toys, and much more. And what you can't find in your local stores, you can definitely find on-line. We have access to a virtual eco-mall and a virtual community of people concerned for the health and well-being of our children and our planet.

Yes, parenting in the 21st century may be much more complicated than in the past, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to raise a child. It just takes a little common sense -- and maybe a broadband connection.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: consumer safety, child safety, parenting, baby bottles, toxic chemicals, child-rearing

Christopher Gavigan is author of the new book Healthy Child Healthy World: Creating a Cleaner, Greener, Safer Home, and CEO/executive director of the national nonprofit Healthy Child Healthy World.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Food
Posted by: Phenix on May 1, 2008 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At times I fear for my nephew. I'm glad he is not showing signs of autism but he most certainly is exposed to deadly chemicals an pesticides on a daily basis. I try to explain that they can feed him organic food from a farmers market that is 5-10 miles from their house. Its true that they'll eat less but they already eat too much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Feed Your Child Intellectual Challenges
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on May 1, 2008 11:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NewScientist earlier this week and the New York Times yesterday both carried stories on exercises that can increase fluid intelligence, IQ.

"The key, researchers found, was carefully structured training in working memory — the kind that allows memorization of a telephone number just long enough to dial it. This type of memory is closely related to fluid intelligence, according to background information in the article, and appears to rely on the same brain circuitry. So the researchers reasoned that improving it might lead to improvements in fluid intelligence."

I remember playing a game on my Speak & Read, part of the Speak & Spell line of products by Texas Instruments, called "Letter Stumper".

The game basically has the person memorize ever longer lists of random letters and enter them back into the device forwards or backwards depending on difficulty level.

I played that game all the time as a kid until I had mastered it (And got a Nintendo which ruined me ;) ). As an adult having taken IQ tests my score ranges from 128 - 144. Coincidence? I used to think it was my genes but after reading that article I am not so sure anymore.

Suffice it to say I know what toy I will buy off eBay when I have a child, along with finding a more challenging version when they master it, and I would suggest other parents do the same.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Normal children and the Status Quo
Posted by: Cathyc on May 1, 2008 12:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The less exposed infants / young children are to the Status Quo aka Mainstream Society, the more autonomous as adults they will be, i.e., people who intuitively know how to live happy and responsible lives.

The first three years of our life are THE most important years of our psychological development.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

*consumer angst*
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on May 6, 2008 11:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
only if you spend as much time CONSUMING crap as you do PARENTING or PARTICIPATING in your democracy.

oh right.

nevermind...


~~~
Spread Love...

BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian com
~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
"do no harm"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There Is Help for Concerned Parents!
Posted by: Liberty G on May 7, 2008 6:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are a number of organizations providing advocacy and good information for parents on choosing less toxic products. These include my own, Toxics Information Project (TIP), Environmental Working Group (EWG), the Center for Health, Environment & Justice (CHEJ) and Public Interest Research Group (US PIRG).

WHAT TO DO?

To access info from these, you can go to: www.toxicsinfo.org/TIPS_kids.htm There you will find articles on which toys and ingredients are toxic, and how to identify the safer ones.

To sign an online petition calling for children's products and toys made without endocrine disrupting phthalates and bisphenol-A (commonly used in plastic and in cosmetics), and for info about state and national legislation, see: www.toxicsinfo.org/legislation.htm

THREE QUICK TIPS ABOUT PLASTIC PRODUCTS

1. Look for the recycling number, usually on the bottom of the item or bottle. IF IT IS A 3, 6 or 7 DON'T BUY/USE IT! These numbers indicate the presence of one or more of the risky chemicals.

2. When buying toys, look for the symbol CE, in capital letters, on the box or the product. This indicates that the item has passed the far stricter standards of the European Union Directive for children's products. BUY TOYS WITH THE "CE" SYMBOL!

3. NEVER MICROWAVE IN PLASTIC! When subjected to heat, plastic leaches out dangerous chemicals like the ones above.

There are, fortunately, many alternative, healthier products out there! By checking out the information above and following these simple tips as well, you can greatly reduce the risk to your children from toxic products.

Blessings,

Liberty Goodwin, Director
Toxics Information Project (TIP)
www.toxicsinfo.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]