Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Global Warming: Nine Things that Will Put us Over the Edge

By Steve Connor, The Independent UK. Posted February 8, 2008.


Scientists have identified nine 'tipping points' of climate change.
Advertisement

Nine ways in which the Earth could be tipped into a potentially dangerous state that could last for many centuries have been identified by scientists investigating how quickly global warming could run out of control.

A major international investigation by dozens of leading climate scientists has found that the "tipping points" for all nine scenarios -- such as the melting of the Arctic sea ice or the disappearance of the Amazon rainforest -- could occur within the next 100 years.

The scientists warn that climate change is likely to result in sudden and dramatic changes to some of the major geophysical elements of the Earth if global average temperatures continue to rise as a result of the predicted increase in emissions of man-made greenhouse gases.

Most and probably all of the nine scenarios are likely to be irreversible on a human timescale once they pass a certain threshold of change, and the widespread effects of the transition to the new state will be felt for generations to come, the scientists said.

"Society may be lulled into a false sense of security by smooth projections of global change. Our synthesis of present knowledge suggests that a variety of tipping elements could reach their critical point within this century under anthropogenic [man-made] climate change," they report in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The study came out of a 2005 meeting of 36 leading climate scientists who drew on the expertise of a further 52 specialists. It is believed to be the first time that scientists have attempted to assess the risks of what they have termed "tipping elements" in the Earth's climate system.

The nine elements range from the melting of polar ice sheets to the collapse of the Indian and West African monsoons. The effects of the changes could be equally varied, from a dramatic rise in sea levels that flood coastal regions to widespread crop failures and famine. Some of the tipping points may be close at hand, such as the point at which the disappearance of the summer sea ice in the Arctic becomes inevitable, whereas others, such as the tipping point for the destruction of northern boreal forests, may take several more decades to be reached.

While scenarios such as the collapse of the Indian monsoon could occur within a few years, others, such as the melting of the Greenland ice cap or the West Antarctic ice sheet, may take several centuries to complete. "Our findings suggest that a variety of tipping elements could reach their critical point in this century under human-induced climate change," said Professor Timothy Lenton, of the University of East Anglia, who led the study.

A tipping point is defined as the point where a small increase in temperature or other change in the climate could trigger a disproportionately larger change in the future. Although there are many potential tipping points that could occur this century, it is still possible to avoid them with cuts in greenhouse gases, said Professor Lenton.

He added: "But we should be prepared to adapt ... and to design an early-warning system that alerts us to them in time."

Irreversible changes

* Arctic sea ice: some scientists believe that the tipping point for the total loss of summer sea ice is imminent.

* Greenland ice sheet: total melting could take 300 years or more but the tipping point that could see irreversible change might occur within 50 years.

* West Antarctic ice sheet: scientists believe it could unexpectedly collapse if it slips into the sea at its warming edges.

* Gulf Stream: few scientists believe it could be switched off completely this century but its collapse is a possibility.

* El Niño: the southern Pacific current may be affected by warmer seas, resulting in far-reaching climate change.

* Indian monsoon: relies on temperature difference between land and sea, which could be tipped off-balance by pollutants that cause localised cooling.

* West African monsoon: in the past it has changed, causing the greening of the Sahara, but in the future it could cause droughts.

* Amazon rainforest: a warmer world and further deforestation may cause a collapse of the rain supporting this ecosystem.

* Boreal forests: cold-adapted trees of Siberia and Canada are dying as temperatures rise.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: tipping points, climate change, global warming

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
don't worry
Posted by: Joe on Feb 8, 2008 5:23 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"good natured" liberals will push us over the edge. just was listening to npr today and they were talking about how the ethanol push is making "global warming" worse with forest being laid to waste to create growing space. turns out the dying plant matter creates even more co2.

way to go...keep up the playing god experimentation instead of letting things happen naturally and we will be at disaster's edge in no time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: don't worry Posted by: Obijuan
» RE: don't worry Posted by: sunlakedude
» monsanto Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» RE: don't worry Posted by: dcperman
» RE: don't worry Posted by: donl51
» An Arabian Outlook Posted by: harryf200
» RE: An Arabian Outlook Posted by: edgar_michel
» RE: don't worry Posted by: abbadon2007
» RE: don't worry Posted by: desertlakes
wutdut
Posted by: isocrat on Feb 8, 2008 6:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do all these seem like first order phase transitions?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» nuclear: penny wise and pound foolish Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Let god handle it???What a joke.
Posted by: jjjhein on Feb 9, 2008 4:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your "skygod" myths are useless in the face of SCIENTIFIC fact. No, I won't wait for your inane god to handle natural events. That myth has only led to abuse of people and nature for eons....Oh, I forgot, your god created the Earth only about six thousand years ago. Yes, you nuts sure understand science. Or perhaps all you fundamentalist losers can just hold your hands up in the trance position and speak in tongues telling HIM up in the sky to please fix it....And while at it, can you please pray for PEACE?? See if it works.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Let god handle it???What a joke. Posted by: the islander
» RE: Let god handle it???What a joke. Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Let god handle it???What a joke. Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» Fix to Broken Links Posted by: edgar_michel
Up to our necks in it
Posted by: John Annis on Feb 9, 2008 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds like a surge in tipping points. The result of the next election could well be down to the floating voter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I give up on mankind changing...
Posted by: scarlettgreyfell on Feb 9, 2008 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I give up! We are all ignorant lied to idoits!! Now all I want to know is WHERE the climate is going to change HOW!! Just wondering where I should plan on trying to get to when it all falls apart! What a sad state of affairs for "intelligent" man! Seems the animals have more "instinct" than we have "intelligence"!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I give up on mankind changing... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
you know what would suck?
Posted by: dannrusso on Feb 9, 2008 5:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and I know this is just totally a guess, but in the past few thousand years we havent really had an iceage. AND, every couple of thousand years the poles change...maybe what we're going through (of course, not helped by stupid "people") is the middle part that scientists have never been able to figure out - what happens between the time where the poles are normal and when they switch - who knows - magnetic north changes all the time - it could be in Nova Scotia by now :-P

ok - so I pulled most of that out of my ass, but it COULD happen - if it does, nothing we can do about it...however, we can stop making it worse by being more environmentally conscious and taking care of ourselves and our planet a little better

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You know, I've had the same thought. Posted by: James T. Swaggart
The tipping point of a planet of limited size stressed by
Posted by: leerhok on Feb 9, 2008 6:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
unlimited human consumption and pollution seems more imminent than the climate change ones. When will growth in China, India & CO bring about total collapse of the global ecology???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

complaint
Posted by: mwildfire on Feb 9, 2008 6:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, that just whets the appetite--why is there no link to find further details? One line on each tipping point is awfully inadequate.
leerhok--don't blame the Chinese and Indians--they're just catching up to levels of damage the US and EU and other first world countries have been pumping out for a century. But we can't leave them out of the solution either--arguments are stupid when the solution involves EVERYBODY limiting their families to one child and their CO2 emissions to some acceptable number. But other than the population one, many of these actions require national policy change--it ain't easy to quit driving to a job 25 miles away when there is no public transit, and no housing where the job is, and no plugin hybrid available to buy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: complaint Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: complaint Posted by: desertlakes
Sunlight and wind are the solutions to fossil fuel-sourced pollution.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Feb 9, 2008 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's the basic point that is almost never mentioned in press articles on global warming - we're finally seeing honest discussion of the problem in the press, but not of the solution - which involves ending the use of coal and oil and gas as energy sources.

That's really the only solution. There are no viable "clean coal" or "emissions capture" technologies that could allow us to continue using fossil fuels.

Corporate proponents of nuclear power are not looking to shut down coal-fired plants - they want to make money by expanding nuclear power, while using the global warming problem for PR purposes. However, take away the accident liability protection (Price-Anderson) and the guaranteed billions in loans and the whole industry would collapse - nuclear power is not cheap.

Industrial agribusiness concerns want to sell biofuels, not to reform agriculture in order to get it off of fossil fuels and petrochemicals in the first place. Can farms be self-supporting with respect to energy use? Yes, they can. You can run all U.S. agriculture on wind, sunlight, and locally produced biofuels.

Of course, the problem is that the economic value of the existing fossil fuel infrastructure is at least $10 trillion dollars, and to replace all that with renewables will cost a similar amount - and the billionaires who are currently raking in the cash from their investments in Exxon and Chevron, and who also control the corporate press, certainly don't want to see anything change.

In greed lies the destruction of humanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Slave plantations were 100% organic... Posted by: thoughtcriminal
If global warming
Posted by: bitsfick on Feb 9, 2008 7:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is a natural phenomena, and not caused by human activity doesn't change anything. No matter what the cause the earth is still warming up. I am getting the impression from you naysayers, that if global warming is a natural thing we have nothing to worry about. The truth of the matter is if the human race is to survive this warming, we are going to have to adapt. The first thing we have to do is stop breeding like rabbits, we live on an island, and on this island, there is a finite amount of land, water, and fuel, and when those run out we will go the way of the dinosaurs. Global warming or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush will take care of the problem,
Posted by: symcokid on Feb 9, 2008 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
he has already inferred that nature has the ability to take care of itself. Guess that's why he didn't push to bring charges against Israel after they blew up Lebanon's oil storage facilities that flowed into their gulf waters. These strong beliefs are the reason why he won't sign on with Kyoto and besides he is busy right now attempting to prop up or jump start our economy again because that is one thing that nature can't take care of.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The West Antarctic doesn't have to melt.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Feb 9, 2008 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We won't have to wait for West Antarctic ice to melt; if the amount of water melted on the surface increases, as it has for the last few years, and seeps down into cracks, according to scientists that water will both hydraulically open cracks in the ice shelf and, when it reaches the earth below, act as a lubricant to the ice pack's movement. Thus, the West Antarctic ice doesn't have to melt, just slide into the ocean and raise world sea level 20 feet or so – and this very scenario has occurred in the past.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

2005: Global Warming is a Fairy Tale
Posted by: PaulK on Feb 9, 2008 10:32 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2008: Only nuclear power can cure global warming.

It's the same machine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» nukes will not save us Posted by: toddcory
» RE: Nuclear Power is Bullshit Posted by: jeffrey7
» I know all this stuff Posted by: PaulK
» RE: Nuclear Power is Bullshit Posted by: suprmark
» pfft! apples and oranges Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» Obama loves you Posted by: fifthworld
Europe Has The Solution
Posted by: opmoc on Feb 9, 2008 10:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The main cause of all environmental issues is one that is rarely discussed. It is overpopulation. The planet is a finite space and whilst there are enough resources to sustain the current levels of population this cannot be sustained indefinitely.

If human population gracefully declines and we start treating our home - the planet earth - with the respect it deserves - we can turn our home into a really nice place to live for all earth lifeforms.

In Europe we need a fertility rate of 2.1 births to sustain current population levels.

Europeans are leading the World to solve the real problem...

FERTILITY RATE
In Europe 2.1 children per woman is considered to be the population replacement level. These are national averages
Ireland: 1.99
France: 1.90
Norway: 1.81
Sweden 1.75
UK: 1.74
Netherlands: 1.73
Germany: 1.37
Italy: 1.33
Spain: 1.32
Greece: 1.29
Source: Eurostat - 2004 figures

Rather than squabbling over resources and climate change - the rest of the World should learn about the lifestyles of the Germans, Italians, the Spanish and the Greeks.

If the rest of the world had similar birth rates and we started building things to last - instead of building things to fail - and throw away - to maintain corporate profits - and destroy even more of the planet - then we could turn our home into a really nice place to live in.

How do we achieve this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LETS STAND UP AND TRY
Posted by: using on Feb 9, 2008 10:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Big Oil Companies may not want wind and solar energy -- but we need it to ...for one
thing, save our planet and also, to unchain ourselves from the strangling business interests! How can we, the powerless, the Abels of the world arise and conquer? The obvious answer is -- we are the educated, capable, hard working, ready to give our all for our families and their future and even for our community and the human race -- majority. A MAJORITY capable of grouping together, and supporting our own solar industries that will drive our homes. We are capable of creating our own cars -- food, crafts etc. Think of all the unemployed engineers, car mechanics, business people trained and maybe working in McDonalds who we could enlist. We -- we may have had our attention deverted by designer labels and star endorsements -- but we, the Abels of the world, can cut the cord that is binding us to servitude and directing us to distruction. We can restructure our thinking, reprogram our desires. How? Well, who would have thought that we could outlaw cigerattes in restaurants, and restructure our instintive response from seeing the Frank Sinatraish cigeratte smoker as sophisticated, to a fool wlaking blindly into the possibility of lung cancer and causing second hand smoke polution.
THe theiving money makers hire their talent. The talent lies in us. We just have to realize where our true power is -- and direct it to regrouping and fullfilling our own best interests and that will, clearly, also benifit the greater society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: LETS STAND UP AND TRY Posted by: opmoc
» RE: LETS STAND UP AND TRY Posted by: using
» RE: LETS STAND UP AND TRY Posted by: opmoc
» talk is cheap Posted by: toddcory
Might they be....
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Feb 9, 2008 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush Administration, the Republicans,the Democrats,Big Oil, Big Coal, Big Business,Public Apathy, Media Misinformation,
failure to enact Kyoto Accords, Greed and Pure Stupidity about the 'price of progress'.
From what I observe,the Toll is too much to bear.
Draft Jeffrey7 for Prez '08
www,youtube,com/RevJeffrey7
LIVE SIMPLY SO OTHER'S MAY SIMPLY LIVE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not an optimist
Posted by: PaulK on Feb 9, 2008 12:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe we've tipped.

The Arctic ice pack is certainly headed for open sun-absorbing ocean. That will warm Siberia. Siberia is releasing its billions of tons of stored methane during its summers.

The Antarctic peninsula is slowly melting. (see "antarctic connection" on the web for temperatures). It's been above freezing all January and it's slowly getting bare and black. The water around this peninsula is slowly losing ice cover, and then the ocean absorbs more heat.

So far the edge of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet in Pine Island Bay is intact, but I keep hearing rumors about cracks. The sheet itself, once the top quarter inch melts, absorbs 4 times as much of the sun's heat and starts melting inside all Austral summer.

With peak oil, carbon dioxide production is surging. People worldwide are switching to coal, to carbon-expensive oil in Alberta's tar sands, to charcoal made from what once were forests, to ethanol grown on cleared forest land.

Everything we know geologically says that the earth can switch violently into a global warming period, all by itself.

Sorry, but I'm realistic about what's happening. I consider this article to be really cautious about global warming, sort of like the DLC.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OK So, basically nothing will happen for about 100 years...
Posted by: aka_bozo on Feb 9, 2008 1:11 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This means, if you think things will get worse you should NOT have kids, you’ll be dead before anything bad happens - end of story.

If you currently have kids, you can tell them "if you think things will be bad then see the first sentence". Your kids will be dead before anything bad happens, you told them the choices so YOU’VE got no guilt.

Otherwise, if you think things will be GREAT, because of fantastic new technologies, or your imaginary friend will take care of things, then YOU don't have to change your behavior at all. Have all the kids you want.

Sounds like this "global-warming thing" is a non-story then. There's a solution for BOTH sides that works perfectly. So, stop talking about it, and pick a solution that works for you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Your imaginary friend...LOL!! Posted by: veggiegrrrl
It's Cooling, fellow, not warming
Posted by: dayahka on Feb 9, 2008 2:16 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your data and research are totally out of date, my good man. You get an "F". There is, by the way, no evidence that human activities have the slightest effect on climate change--it's the Sun, you know that big round thing in the sky. If sun spots fail to erupt, we face global cooling that will really wipe out much of human activity (like agriculture). Give me warming any day over cooling, and if cooling is coming, we can pump all the co2 we want and it won't do any good. Time for underground cities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Global Warming No Longer Can Be Stopped!
Posted by: sofla100 on Feb 9, 2008 2:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Global warming has become so evident that even the Bush Administration has very grudgingly started to accept it. That is, after banishing NASA and NOAA scientists that dared to talk about it. But, the USA plan is a basically a voluntary one based on so-called carbon credits. Of course, it's the USA that turns to the so-called "free market" for this. But, the bottom line is this, we are way past the point of return. The ice caps are going and we should expect a sea rise of over 10 feet in the next 100 years or so. The net result is we are going to lose Miami, Boston, Charleston, San Francisco and a good junk of LA, just in the USA. This because no matter what the USA even does now, which has been pathetically little, countries like China and India are engaging in massive waves of industrialization. And, they are not going to be stopped for something like global warming, that is, until this warming stops them. Perhaps, it could have been different. If the USA and Bush would have adopted Kyoto, an example would have been set, and we would be on a different course now. Alas, it was not to be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's the Worry?
Posted by: harryf200 on Feb 9, 2008 2:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For goodness sake! The planet will survive! It's just us humans who will become extinct. Do we deserve any better?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I wish I knew that you were wrong. Posted by: Raymond Emerson
the reality check
Posted by: davidg on Feb 9, 2008 2:43 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Doesn't the ecological reality trump everything, and all activity must be organized it its deference? That would be rational. And the current election parade of plutocrats (it goes on for 2 fucking years and millions of dollars like a long term football series with its egregious expense and partying (no pun)) is just another big Vonnegut style joke. He had the right ideas....he knew we were fools and could make us see it.

So, bore everybody with it. Dont' stop talking about it on the subways and refuse to talk consumer niceties and pleasant jokes. Send emails to everyone (like forward this alternet article) and become a bit of a pain in the ass. What have you got to lose.

And when friends line up to go to mass, shit on the Catholic attitude to birth control and when friends pooh pooh global warming, send them another article. Or if former friends do.

The talk can't stop. Silence = Death.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What we can do about global warming and climate change
Posted by: macdon1 on Feb 9, 2008 7:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bend over and kiss your ass goodbye.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The article is too short sighted. We know a lot more:
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Feb 9, 2008 7:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hydrogen Sulfide gas will Kill all people. Homo Sap will go
EXTINCT unless drastic action is taken.

October 2006 Scientific American

"EARTH SCIENCE
Impact from the Deep
Strangling heat and gases emanating from the earth and sea, not
asteroids, most likely caused several ancient mass extinctions.
Could the same killer-greenhouse conditions build once again?
By Peter D. Ward
downloaded from:
http://www.sciam.com/
article.cfm?articleID=
00037A5D-A938-150E-
A93883414B7F0000&
sc=I100322
....................Most of the article omitted......................
But with atmospheric carbon climbing at an annual rate of 2 ppm
and expected to accelerate to 3 ppm, levels could approach 900
ppm by the end of the next century, and conditions that bring
about the beginnings of ocean anoxia may be in place. How soon
after that could there be a new greenhouse extinction? That is
something our society should never find out."

Press Release
Pennsylvania State University
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, Nov. 3, 2003
downloaded from:
http://www.geosociety.org/meetings/2003/prPennStateKump.htm
"In the end-Permian, as the levels of atmospheric oxygen fell and
the levels of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide rose, the upper
levels of the oceans could have become rich in hydrogen sulfide
catastrophically. This would kill most of the oceanic plants and
animals. The hydrogen sulfide dispersing in the atmosphere would
kill most terrestrial life."

www.astrobio.net is a NASA web zine. See:

http://www.astrobio.net/
news/modules.php?op=
modload&name=News&
file=article&sid=672

http://www.astrobio.net/
news/modules.php?op=
modload&name=News&
file=article&sid=1535

http://www.astrobio.net/
news/article2509.html

http://astrobio.net/news/
modules.php?op=modload
&name=News&file=article
&sid=2429&mode=thread
&order=0&thold=0

These articles agree with the first 2. They all say 6 degrees C or
1000 parts per million CO2 is the extinction point.

The global warming is already 1 degree Farenheit. 11 degrees
Farenheit is about 6 degrees Celsius. The book "Six Degrees" by
Mark Lynas agrees. If the global warming is 6 degrees
centigrade, we humans go extinct. See:
http://www.marklynas.org/
2007/4/23/six-steps-to-hell-
summary-of-six-degrees-as-
published-in-the-guardian

"Under a Green Sky" by Peter D. Ward, Ph.D., 2007.
Paleontologist discusses mass extinctions of the past and the one
we are doing to ourselves.

ALL COAL FIRED POWER PLANTS MUST BE
CONVERTED TO NUCLEAR IMMEDIATELY TO AVOID
THE EXTINCTION OF US HUMANS. 32 countries have
nuclear power plants. Only 9 have the bomb. The top 3
producers of CO2 all have nuclear power plants, coal fired power
plants and nuclear bombs. They are the USA, China and India.
Reducing CO2 production by 90% by 2050 requires drastic action
in the USA, China and India. King Coal has to be demoted to a
commoner. Coal must be left in the earth. If you own any coal
stock, NOW is the time to dump it, regardless of loss, because it
will soon be worthless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Six Degrees" by Mark Lynas is the book you were looking for.
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Feb 9, 2008 7:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great damage has been done, but we still have 8 years before natural positive
feedbacks lead to our EXTINCTION. Sea level will continue to rise even if we
disappear right now, but that is "minor" compared to poison gas bubbling out of
the ocean and killing almost everything including all of the people.
See the chart on page 274 of "Six Degrees" by Mark Lynas. We have until 2015
to BEGIN REDUCING our total CO2 output and we have until 2050 to actually
reduce our CO2 output by 90%. The curve has to start down by 2015, not we
have to think about it by then. The peak of our CO2 production has to happen in
the next 8 years. That means stopping the building of coal fired power plants
world wide immediately. It means replacing coal fired power plants with nuclear
power plants world wide with ZERO interference from paranoid protesters.

How are YOU going to do it? Go ahead and invest YOUR money if your answer
is anything other than nuclear power. I don't want to waste my money on pie in
the sky like wind, solar, bio and geothermal. Too much research is still needed.
If we don't follow the schedule in Six Degrees, we will encounter positive
feedbacks which will take the control of the climate out of our hands.
Civilization may fall anyway well before 2050, but we can avoid going extinct by
2100. We have to hold the CO2 level to 400 parts per million to have a 75%
chance of avoiding the positive feedbacks. The natural positive feedbacks are
explained in Six Degrees.

I have zero financial interest in nuclear power, and I never have had a financial
interest in nuclear power. My sole motivation in writing this is to avoid extinction
by H2S gas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have seen global warming in my lifetime.
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Feb 9, 2008 7:43 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Downloaded FROM: Environmental Defense
http://environmentaldefenseblogs.org/
climate411/2008/01/14/global_winds/

This post is by James Wang, Ph.D., a climate scientist at Environmental Defense.

You may have heard about the persistent droughts in the western U.S., Australia,
and other regions. The Upper Colorado River Basin is experiencing a protracted,
multi-year drought that started in 1999. Australia's record drought is threatening
the livelihood of traditional farmers and ranchers.

At what point does a passing drought become a permanent shift to desert
conditions, and why would such a thing happen?

It can happen because of global warming. Climate change can alter global winds,
the strength and location of high and low pressure systems, and other climate
factors.

.........shortened.........Graphics and URLs omitted.

Global winds shape the Earth's climate, determining - in broad strokes - which
areas are tropical, desert, or temperate. Here's a simplified overview of how it
works.

The Sun heats the Earth most intensely in the tropical zone around the equator. The
heated air rises, cools, and then dumps its moisture as rain. That's why there are
rain forests in the tropics.

The now drier air is forced by the continuously rising equatorial air to move
towards the temperate latitudes on either side of the equator. At roughly 30° N and
S - called the "horse latitudes" - it can move no further due to the Earth’s rotation,
and settles to the surface. As the air sinks, it compresses and warms, creating hot,
rain-free conditions. This circulation pattern, called a Hadley cell, is why the
deserts of the world are located just poleward of the tropics, to the north and south.

Poleward of the desert belt, strong, high-altitude winds known as the jet streams
flow from west to east, carrying large storms with them. These mid-latitude,
temperate-region storms are an important source of rain and snow, especially
during the winter season. Much of the world's population lives in the temperate
region. It includes most of the U.S. and southern Canada, most of Europe, East
Asia, southern South America, southern Africa, and southern Australia and New
Zealand.

But climate regions aren't fixed. Several independent studies have found that
global winds are shifting due to global warming, and the shifts are faster than
predicted by climate models. Most recently is this new study in Nature
Geoscience. The tropical belt has widened by several degrees latitude since 1979.
This is consistent with other observations suggesting that the jet streams and storm
tracks have moved poleward.

The drought-stricken Upper Colorado River Basin, which includes Lake Powell, is
located just poleward of the horse latitudes at around 37° N. This has historically
been in the temperate zone, but the desert zone may be gradually encroaching upon
it. (Since nothing is simple, there are other factors contributing to this particular
drought, as well.) Similarly, water-starved Sydney, Australia at 34° S is just
poleward of the southern horse latitude.

What we may be seeing here is not so much drought as desertification - a shift in
global climate patterns due to global warming. Areas that used to be in temperate
zones may be shifting into desert, while areas that had been arid receive more
precipitation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: warming Posted by: bitsfick
Break Through on environmental strategy
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Feb 9, 2008 7:56 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reference the book: "Break Through" by Ted Nordhaus and Michael
Shellenberger, 2007.

The message is: "Environmentalists have the wrong STRATEGY and the wrong
Philosophy." From page 272: "Whether we like it or not, humans have become
the meaning of the earth." Nordhaus and Shellenberger recommend changing
from a message about limits and separating people from nature to a message about
growth of clean energy and seeing people as part of nature. Clearly humans are
part of nature. We ARE clearly part of our Universe and we cannot be separate
from it.
On the good side, we are the only organism capable of spreading earth life to other
planets and defending Mother Earth from giant asteroid impacts. On the bad side,
we are capable of causing our own extinction by means of global warming. A
total global warming of 11 degrees Fahrenheit will cause H2S to bubble out of the
oceans and kill everybody and almost all of the other life forms that we care about.
We have already caused one degree Fahrenheit of global warming and natural
positive feedbacks may kick in soon.

Nordhaus and Shellenberger recommend working WITH human psychology rather
than fighting it. Human psychology is illogical from the previous philosophy of
environmentalism, but can be taken advantage of by changing philosophies. The
old philosophy is getting us nowhere. With a new strategy, we can be in favor of
both economic growth and stopping global warming. Stopping global warming
requires government investment in implementation of green energy such as nuclear
electric power to replace the biggest CO2 generator and polluter, coal fired power
plants. This has to be done immediately. For later use, research and development
of wind, solar and geothermal needs to be federally funded.

Our new strategy must include growth beyond the cradle which is earth. We
MUST expand into space and the economic incentive for doing so is infinite. We
can and we will do so by means of the space elevator. See: www.liftport.com.
One iron asteroid about 2.5 miles in diameter is worth $35 TRillion. See:
"Mining the Sky" by Lewis.
Likewise the biological incentive. "Cosmological Forecast" at
jetpress.org/volume12/CosmologicalForecast.htm. According to the
Cosmological Forecast, for every century we delay the onset of Galactic
colonization, there will be 5 times 10 exponent 46 fewer human lifetimes between
now and the time the galaxy dies. That is 5 followed by 46 "0"s. Our population
explosion may be allowed to continue as long as it happens in space, not on earth.
The solar system as a whole can support 10 times as many people as earth alone.

Check out http://lifeboat.com. Some of us are working on surviving in space
while the rest of you undergo your ecological disaster. We can repopulate earth
much later.

We have to colonize space for another reason. In only 33,000 years, Proxima
Centauri, a red dwarf star, will enter our Oort Cloud, causing a period of "Heavy
Bombardment." Earth will be struck by giant impactors like the one that killed the
dinosaurs unless we humans are out there preventing it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hoping For the Impossible: That Mankind IS Not To Be Just Another Evolutionary Dead-End
Posted by: sofla100 on Feb 9, 2008 8:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
65 million years ago, it is believed an asteroid struck the Earth, causing mass extinction of the dinosaurs. Today, mankind may well be along her way towards another mass extinction, which will actually be the sixth extinction in geological time. But, it will probably not be caused by an asteroid, but by man himself. Now, I'm sorry, but I don't believe