Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Environment

Ski Resorts Are Reinventing Themselves in the Face of Global Warming

By Jim Motavalli, E Magazine. Posted January 14, 2008.


You know things are bad when ski resorts have to reinvent themselves into "sun and fun" parks with bumper boats and miniature golf.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Marshall Heaven of Greenwich, Connecticut got tired of waiting for the snow to fall, so he bought two Backyard Blizzard snowmakers and can now promise 15-foot drifts as early as late November .... Even though it's late January in Mason Township, Maine, Steve Crone of New England Dogsledding tethers his eager canines to a golf cart. "We'd rather have snow," he says with some embarrassment ... Fifteen-year-old Cameron Sonley of Peterborough, Ontario, where the winter was two degrees warmer than usual in the 2006-2007 season, complained last March that because of high temperatures he was only able to go snowboarding four or five times, instead of his usual dozen .... In Staten Island, New York, skaters have been thwarted for three straight years as pond ice failed to thicken ... Janisse Ray, an outdoor recreation enthusiast in Danville, Vermont, got so frustrated when the West River hadn't frozen by last January that she donned a wetsuit and floated downstream in an inner tube, holding aloft a sign that said "Where's winter?"

Where indeed? Since 1970, average winter temperatures in New England have increased 4.4 degrees Fahrenheit. In the U.S., 2006 was the warmest year on record, and 1998 is number two. The last eight five-year periods were the warmest since we began taking national records 112 years ago. During the past 25 to 30 years, says the National Climatic Data Center, the warming trend has accelerated, from just over a tenth of one degree Fahrenheit per decade to almost a third of a degree.

By the end of the century, temperatures in the Northeastern states are likely to rise by eight to 12 degrees Fahrenheit (at which time snow-covered days will have been reduced to half of what we traditionally experience). A 2007 report from the Union of Concerned Scientists on the Northeast predicted that, under some higher-emission scenarios, "Only western Maine is projected to retain a reliable ski season by the end of the century, and only northern New Hampshire would support a snowmobiling season longer than two months." Warmer weather and changing precipitation will result in a fundamental change to winter recreation and what the report called "the winter landscape."

Our Changing Climate

When Nat "King" Cole sang about "Jack Frost nipping at your nose" and "folks dressed up like Eskimos" in 1946, a white Christmas was standard fare in many parts of America. But with today's milder winters, Jack Frost is not such a regular visitor and hats and gloves are spending more time in the closet.

The Hood Museum at Dartmouth College recently mounted a major exhibit of Inuit clothing, tools and art -- materials adapted to one of the coldest places on Earth. But the once-stable climate there is changing. The Arctic Climate Impact Assessment said in 2004 that Arctic temperatures are now rising at nearly twice the rate of the rest of the world (as much as 14 degrees Fahrenheit on average over the next 100 years), reducing sea ice and melting frozen soils. It's been widely reported that Alaska's polar bears are probably doomed by 2050, but the scale of this climatic shift will likely do much more -- completely changing the culture of the Arctic region.

Though there are still a few diehards, the overwhelming majority of scientists now believe that climate change is at least partly responsible for our steadily rising thermometers. Obviously, global warming science is complex and hardly monolithic -- some parts of the world continue to experience very cold temperatures and record snowfalls, just as the climate models say they will. You might even be reading this as a blizzard fulfills the promise of a white winter. But the overwhelming trend is clear: it's getting warmer, and winter is losing force, intensity and duration, changing America's ingrained habits in the process. If you've ever enjoyed ice skating, sledding, skiing, snowboarding or building a snowman, you should know that the future of these enshrined institutions is by no means guaranteed.

In the film Lucky Numbers, John Travolta plays a local weatherman who has it all, including a lucrative snowmobile franchise. Unfortunately, the winter season fails to deliver any snow, so the dealership goes bankrupt. That was fiction, but the Boston Globe recently reported on the real-life closing of Kingdom Cat, a dealership in northerly Island Pond, the "snowmobile capital of Vermont." After several years of little snow and 30 machines left in inventory, owner Bob Halpin decided to call it a day. "The winters have gotten progressively worse," he said. "We decided to cut our losses."

The closing of a northern Vermont snowmobile dealership is hardly an isolated incident. In 2006, major snowmobile manufacturer Polaris had 40 percent lower sales than in 2005. In the U.S., sales for the fiscal year ending last March 31 were down 12 percent from the previous year, reports the International Snowmobile Manufacturers Association (ISMA) in Michigan. Total sales of 79,814 in 2006 contrasted sharply with the 170,325 sold in 1997.

"If it doesn't snow, people don't downhill ski, they don't cross-country ski and, guess what, they don't snowmobile either," says Ed Klem executive director of ISMA. Snowmaking isn't an option when the typical Upper Peninsula, Michigan snowmobiler covers 100 miles of trail in a day. "The lack of snow is the highest barrier to entry [into snowmobiling] because consumers don't want to spend $6,000 on a sled unless they're going to use it," Klem says. Many snowmobile manufacturers are saved by the fact that they also make all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), whose sales are steady.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: global warming, climage change, skiing, snowmobiling

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
global warming deniers
Posted by: Don Garb on Jan 14, 2008 5:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This well written and well researched article makes me think of all those hired spin doctors working for the oil industry, in other words, the Bush administration.

Telling lies in the face of overwhelming evidence is just about the stupidest thing anyone can do. Just how stupid do you have to be to tell lies about the weather?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ski resorts are rejoicing over favorable U.S. snow conditions
Posted by: Joe on Jan 14, 2008 5:43 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the new year, Santa left behind just what the nation's ski resorts wanted — the best nationwide snow conditions in several years.

From New England to California, the snow fell in the days and weeks before Christmas. Even Taos, N.M. in the desert southwest, had a 60-inch base.

"This is our best opening since 1977," said Adriana Blake, marketing director for Taos. The resort couldn't open for Thanksgiving, but later got 68 inches in a week. "This is crazy. It never snows like this."

In November, with a few exceptions, some of the most popular resorts in the Rockies and California delayed their openings because of a lack of snow. Most only offered limited terrain because of an unusually balmy and dry fall that produced disastrous wildfires.

Then, the jet stream moved south and the snow began to fall, and fall and fall. Wolf Creek, Colo., which usually has the deepest base in the state, has suffered for the last two years. But a week before Christmas, it had 115 inches.

"It is spectacular. For the first time in recent history, the industry is up and operating across the country," said Michael Berry, president of the National Ski Areas Association.


but since liberals have a lock on pessimism this probably doesn't matter.

Article Linked

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It actually is PROOF of climate change Posted by: johnmeanswhatever
With apologies to Mr. Heaven
Posted by: Knowmad on Jan 14, 2008 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a skier, and I will comment on this article once I've read it if I feel it's warranted. However, after the first two words I just had to say something.

"MARSHALL HEAVEN?" You just gotta be kidding! The possibilities are endless, but what it suggests most to me is the absolutely perfect name for the ideal rightie neocon (Marshall), fundie-religiofascist (Heaven (bound)). It easily outdoes 'Wolf Blitzer' or 'Dana Bash', and even gives 'bush' - as in league or vegetable - a run for its money.

Sorry - couldn't resist. Cheers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And what about grass skiing?
Posted by: Viviane on Jan 14, 2008 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was a kid, I saw a picture of people skiing down a grassy slope in a magazine, and I've always wondered why the idea didn't catch on. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grass_skiing

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Title's a little insufficient but great piece, nonetheless
Posted by: DaBear on Jan 14, 2008 10:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really well written and researched article. I really liked the tangent on the maple sugar industry because that's most of my childhood experience working the family "sugar-bush." I've been hearing that for years and noticing the change in flavor and sizes of product packaging (for ever increasing prices) from VT and upstate NY over the years. My brother still has ties to the sugaring outfits where we grew up and has been documenting this because he saw the writing on the wall a long time ago. A decade and a half ago I used to get VT maple stuff at Trader Joe's but now it's all from Quebec. I have to special order the VT stuff and it tastes different (not bad, just different, less robust and buttery--happens when sap is thinner) and costs more. To me that's a real major bummer, more so than skiing, although the latter sucks because I can still hit the Sierras on my backcountry gear while my school chums in the NE cannot.

The piece was also poignant for me as I store all our family's ski gear in preparation for the foreclosure... thanks major studios and Countrywide/BofA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Disc Golf on the slopes!
Posted by: Hovey on Jan 14, 2008 11:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the great developments is the addition of Disc golf courses on many slopes. Great exercise challenging with the big elevation changes and a growing sport.

http://nefa.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In winter its a marshmellow world...
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line on Jan 14, 2008 12:10 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All I have to say is that nothing in nature remains static... nothing..nothing at all. Temperature averages are all over the place some years are hot some not. Some wet some not... Not saying there is not global warming, but I am suggesting that this ballyhoo of enormous temperature rises that keep going up and up and up is not based in reality, rather it is based in political power mongering... Think about it....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Proving the old adage wrong?
Posted by: Sojourner on Jan 14, 2008 4:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it."

Does our destabilizing of weather patterns count?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Global warming produces greater variability in weather
Posted by: PaulK on Jan 14, 2008 5:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We're going through a cold, then hot, then cold winter, something like last winter. This year we almost set a record for December snowfall with only two big storms. Then early January was a cooker. That stopped with another big storm.

Here in New England total winter precipitation is probably up, and the storms are more powerful so they drag down cold air into the storms better, producing more snow.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

six to 10-degree Fahrenheit rise predicted over the next century
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Jan 14, 2008 10:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
October 2006 Scientific American

"EARTH SCIENCE
Impact from the Deep
Strangling heat and gases emanating from the earth and sea, not
asteroids, most likely caused several ancient mass extinctions.
Could the same killer-greenhouse conditions build once again?
By Peter D. Ward
downloaded from:
http://www.sciam.com/
article.cfm?articleID=
00037A5D-A938-150E-
A93883414B7F0000&
sc=I100322
....................Most of the article omitted......................
But with atmospheric carbon climbing at an annual rate of 2 ppm
and expected to accelerate to 3 ppm, levels could approach 900
ppm by the end of the next century, and conditions that bring
about the beginnings of ocean anoxia may be in place. How soon
after that could there be a new greenhouse extinction? That is
something our society should never find out."

Press Release
Pennsylvania State University
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, Nov. 3, 2003
downloaded from:
http://www.geosociety.org/
meetings/2003/
prPennStateKump.htm
"In the end-Permian, as the levels of atmospheric oxygen fell and
the levels of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide rose, the upper
levels of the oceans could have become rich in hydrogen sulfide
catastrophically. This would kill most of the oceanic plants and
animals. The hydrogen sulfide dispersing in the atmosphere would
kill most terrestrial life."

www.astrobio.net is a NASA web zine. See:

http://www.astrobio.net/
news/modules.php?op=
modload&name=News&file
=article&sid=672

http://www.astrobio.net
/news/modules.php?op=
modload&name=News&file
=article&sid=1535

http://www.astrobio.net/
news/article2509.html

http://astrobio.net/news/
modules.php?op=modload
&name=News&file=article
&sid=2429&mode=thread
&order=0&thold=0

These articles agree with the first 2. They all say 6 degrees C or
1000 parts per million CO2 is the extinction point.

The global warming is already 1 degree Farenheit. 11 degrees
Farenheit is about 6 degrees Celsius. The book "Six Degrees" by
Mark Lynas agrees. If the global warming is 6 degrees
centigrade, we humans go extinct. Nobody will be available to
worry about maple syrup after that time. See:
http://www.marklynas.org
/2007/4/23/six-steps-to-hell
-summary-of-six-degrees-as-
published-in-the-guardian

Asteroid Miner didn't think this stuff up. Alternet should get
serious about reporting Science. Asteroid Miner is not paid to
comment here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet should have reported this.
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Jan 14, 2008 11:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great damage has been done, but we still have 8 years before natural positive
feedbacks lead to our extinction. Sea level will continue to rise even if we
disappear right now, but that is "minor" compared to poison gas bubbling out of
the ocean and killing almost everything including all of the people.
See the chart on page 274 of "Six Degrees" by Mark Lynas. We have until 2015
to BEGIN REDUCING our total CO2 output and we have until 2050 to actually
reduce our CO2 output by 90%. The curve has to start down by 2015, not we
have to think about it by then. The peak of our CO2 production has to happen in
the next 8 years.
How are YOU going to do it? Go ahead and invest YOUR money.

If we don't follow the schedule in Six Degrees, we will encounter positive
feedbacks which will take the control of the climate out of our hands.
Civilization may fall anyway well before 2050, but we can avoid going extinct by
2100. We have to hold the CO2 level to 400 parts per million to have a 75%
chance of avoiding the positive feedbacks. The natural positive feedbacks are
explained in Six Degrees.

We don't recycle nuclear fuel because spent fuel is valuable and people steal it.
The place it went that it wasn't supposed to go to is Israel. This happened in a
small town near Pittsburgh, PA circa 1970. A company called Numec was in the
business of reprocessing nuclear fuel. I almost took a job there, designing a
nuclear battery for a heart pacemaker. [A nuclear battery would have the
advantage of lasting many times as long as any other battery, eliminating many
surgeries to replace batteries.] Numec did NOT have a reactor. Numec "lost"
half a ton of enriched uranium. It wound up in Israel. The Israelis have fueled
both their nuclear power plants and their nuclear weapons by stealing nuclear
"waste." It could work for any other country, such as Iran or the United States.
It is only when you don't have access to nuclear "waste" that you have to do the
difficult process of enriching uranium, unless you have a Canadian "Candu"
reactor that runs on unenriched uranium.
Numec is no longer in business. The reprocessing of nuclear fuel in the US
stopped. That was the only politically possible solution at that time, given that
private corporations did the reprocessing. My solution would be to reprocess the
fuel at a Government Owned Government Operated [GOGO] facility. At a
GOGO plant, bureaucracy and the multiplicity of ethnicity and religion would
disable the transportation of uranium to Israel or to any unauthorized place.
Nothing heavier than a secret would get out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Changes in the Sun’s Surface to Bring Next Climate Change
Posted by: corazon on Jan 15, 2008 10:10 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today, the Space and Science Research Center, (SSRC) in Orlando, Florida announces that it has confirmed the recent web announcement of NASA solar physicists that there are substantial changes occurring in the sun’s surface. The SSRC has further researched these changes and has concluded they will bring about the next climate change to one of a long lasting cold era.

When asked about what this will mean to the average person on the street, Casey was firm. “The last time this particular cycle regenerated was over 200 years ago. I call it the “Bi-Centennial Cycle” solar cycle. It took place between 1793 and 1830, the so-called Dalton Minimum, a period of extreme cold that resulted in what historian John D. Post called the ‘last great subsistence crisis.’ With that cold came massive crops losses, food riots, famine and disease. I believe this next climate change will be much stronger and has the potential to once more cause widespread crop losses globally with the resultant ill effects. The key difference for this next Bi-Centennial Cycle’s impact versus the last is that we will have over 8 billion mouths to feed in the next coldest years where as we had only 1 billion the last time. Among other effects like social and economic disruption, we are facing the real prospect of the ‘perfect storm of global food shortages’ in the next climate change. In answer to the question, everyone on the street will be affected.”


http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=2659

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Space and Science Research Center
Posted by: Salty_Dog on Jan 17, 2008 7:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey, BlackbirdHighway, I also took a look at the web site for SSRC, which was pointed to by 'corazon' as proof that human genesis of climate change, and with it the greater part of climatic science, should be rejected. The thing made me laugh out loud (I'm a scientist myself, so I may have a funny sense of humor).

The SSRC has, they tell us on the site,

"begun to establish itself by taking the first step in its initial start up stage. It has activated with a virtual office site and will transition from its current location to permanent facilities with its next round of funding."

In other words, this "research center" is a PO box and the hasn't done any research yet. (Surely they're pulling our leg with all the words meaning "getting started": Why not just say they're starting to commence to begin starting up and initial first step?!)

Despite this humbly equiped lab, SSRC is nonetheless

"currently an international leader in the field of climate change study".

Ho ho! Good for them. Think how impressive they'll be when they've done some research and got some data!

Fortunately, for this "virtual" lab, they don't really need equipment since their mission is

"the use of the recently announced Theory of Relational Cycles of Solar Activity" developed by the SSRC."

That is, they've created a theory and now they're trying to get funds to go find some evidence for it. Alice in Wonderland meets science & finance! First, invent a theory that appeals to someone with money, get the money, they jimmy up some evidence for the theory!

I wonder if the U.S. is unique in the industrialized world in spawning this kind of junk, this pseudo science?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]