Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

The Biggest Environmental Stories of the Year

By David Roberts and Lisa Hymas, Grist.org. Posted January 1, 2008.


Which enviro stories stole the headlines in 2007?
Advertisement

Wow. That was something else. Green has gone from "dead" to ubiquitous in just a few short years, and it peaked with the crazy buzz of 2007, which kept us busy as bees -- ironically without the actual bees (see No. 15). Here you'll find a selection of the year's top 15 stories, biased toward the U.S. and ranked by a process about as scientific as a James Inhofe press release.

15. Bees buzz off

This year, bees started disappearing, and nobody could figure out why. If so-called "colony collapse disorder" doesn't freak you out, you aren't paying attention: every fruit, nut, and vegetable you've ever eaten traces its origin back to a little bee's tentacles. Is it a coincidence that small-scale, organic-minded beekeepers had better luck? Food writer extraordinaire Michael Pollan doesn't think so. When he Pollanated the story for The New York Times (ha ha! we know!), he pointed out that the bee disappearance is just one manifestation of the increasing industrialization of the food system. There will be others. [Ominous music swells.]

14. Climate skeptics step on rakes

Believe it or not, the hardy band of climate skeptics -- those who flat-out don't believe anthropocentric climate change is real -- is still out there, showing all the resilience of cockroaches. Led by their congressional champion Jumpin' James Inhofe, they fell on their faces over and over again this year, hyping statistically insignificant changes in temperature records, flogging long-discredited quasi-scientific theories, uncritically accepting random non-peer-reviewed studies from "medical researchers," grossly misrepresenting the ruling of a British judge, falling for painfully obvious hoax studies, demanding debate and then dodging it when it's offered, and on and on (and on). What once seemed such a threat to the republic now plays more like a Three Stooges routine. (Psst, guys, the new denial is delay, arguing that climate policy is too expensive. Catch up with your ideological buddies!)

13. Lead-tainted toys scare parents

Lead poisoning can damage reproductive and nervous systems, affect blood pressure, and diminish learning ability. In short, it can eff your kids up something fierce. So parents freaked out when millions of lead-tainted playthings were recalled in the fall. Everybody pointed fingers at China. Consumer advocates and the U.S. House pointed fingers at the shoddy safety standards of the U.S. Nobody pointed fingers at parents determined to buy the cheapest possible plastic gee-gaws at Wal-Mart (oops, except us, just then).

12. Ethanol bubbles with contradictions

On one hand, the ethanol hype ramped up to dizzying new heights this year, driven by subsidy-hungry agribiz, agribiz-friendly Midwest legislators, and, lamentably, credulous environmentalists. It crescendoed with the passage of the energy bill in December, which mandates 36 billion gallons of ethanol by 2022, much like a little boy might close his eyes, furrow his brow, and mandate a rocketship for Christmas. On the other hand, the ethanol backlash gained momentum, as new research and skeptical greens revealed the limitations and unintended consequences of feeding our carbon sinks to our cars. Expect this to be the cat fight of 2008.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: environment, global warming, al gore, coal, bees

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Broken Links
Posted by: SavageDissension on Jan 2, 2008 2:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Granted, this isn't an article written on-site, but it still looks a little bad when just about every link you try to use in this article goes to the Alternet "Page Not Found" page with nary a hint of how to find what the article was actually linking. Anyone want to proof this a bit and see if that can't be cleaned up?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Coal is indeed the enemy of the human race.
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Jan 7, 2008 1:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Either we will take radical action on global warming within the
next 8 years or civilization will collapse by 2050 and we
"humans" will go extinct by 2200. The collapse of civilization
will reduce the total human population to 60 million or less,
perhaps a lot less. YOU will not survive. Global
Warming is therefore the ONLY problem, not just the only
environmental problem, worthy of attention at this time; except
for the problem of escaping from Earth and setting up a self-
sustaining colony on Mars, just in case. The fall of civilization
will happen sooner and the fall of civilization may have the
following "benefit": The burning of fossil fuels will crash along
with the crash of civilization and population. That might prevent
the even bigger disaster of human extinction if civilization crashes
before natural positive feedbacks are triggered. The bad news:
YOU should expect to be in the 99.99% that dies in a typical
civilization crash.

Read the following:

Books: "Under a Green Sky" by Peter Ward

"Six Degrees" by Mark Lynas. See a summary at
http://www.marklynas.org/2007
/4/23/six-steps-to-hell-summary
-of-six-degrees-as-published
-in-the-guardian

"The Long Summer" by Brian Fagan

"Collapse, How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed" by Jared
Diamond. Rated graphic: Cannibalism has been proven to
happen in when societies fail.

"Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy", by B. Comby
English edition, 2001, 345 pp. (soft cover), 38 Euros
TNR Editions, 266 avenue Daumesnil, 75012 Paris, France;
ISBN 2-914190-02-6
order from: http://www.comby.org/livres/livresen.htm
Read a review of this book by the American Health Physics
Society at:
http://www.comby.org/media/
articles/articles.in.english/
HealthPhysics-NUC-July2002.htm
Nuclear power is the only safe and effective replacement for coal.
Please read the book before making a fool of yourself by dissing
nuclear power.

Articles: http://www.sciam.com/article.
cfm?articleID=00037A5D-A938-150E-
A93883414B7F0000&sc=I100322

http://www.geosociety.org/meetings
/2003/prPennStateKump.htm

http://www.astrobio.net/news/
modules.php?op=modload&
name=News&file=article&sid=672

http://www.astrobio.net/news/
modules.php?op=modload&
name=News&file=article&sid=1535

http://www.astrobio.net/news
/article2509.html

http://astrobio.net/news/modules
.php?op=modload&name=
News&file=article&sid=2429
&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

Reliable information URL:
http://www.world-nuclear.org/

32 nations representing 2/3 of humanity have nuclear power
plants, only 9 nations have nuclear bombs.

The Canadian Candu reactor runs on UNenriched uranium. That
means that the expensive enrichment process can now be skipped
by everybody who buys a reactor or technology from Canada.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]