Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

More Churches Going Green

By Cassandra Carmichael, Foreign Policy in Focus. Posted December 17, 2007.


From a religious perspective, global climate change is a moral crisis.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Even people of faith enjoy a good competition now and again. So when Texas Impact, a state-based ecumenical faith organization in Texas that works on environmental concerns, declared that it could sell more compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) than the Illinois-based Faith in Place, a faith organization dedicated to caring for the Earth, the makings of an interesting interstate contest began. By shopping online, congregants can purchase CFLs for their homes and houses of worship. Faith in Place has already declared that it will purchase 500 CFLs and donate them to food pantries across the state, and thus making a true connection between social and ecological justice.

This intriguing competition reveals that despite the differences within and between religious communities in the United States, we are also aware of what joins us together. We share, among other things, a desire and most importantly a religious call to protect all of God's creation. And increasingly, because of its severe, sweeping potential impacts, we have seen the need to come together to address global climate change.

From a religious perspective, global climate change is a moral crisis. Not only because it affects future generations and those around the globe, but because it will hit hardest among the "least of us," the vulnerable communities and people in poverty across the globe. As a community that strives for justice, then, it becomes doubly important that we put our concerted efforts into addressing global climate change.

How we address the issue varies as much as our methods of worship. From light bulb competitions to "greening" our sanctuaries to hosting bike-to-worship Sundays, the faith community is becoming more active, and more vocal.

The Little Church That Did

St. Stephen's Episcopal Church in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania started its journey to become more environmentally friendly when it had to renovate a historic church building after acquiring a nearby property in their urban setting. Instead of using traditional construction methods, St. Stephen's, with its blossoming core of environmentally minded congregants, chose to follow theological principles of construction. It decided to build in ways that protect God's creation and are less polluting, that provide healthy worship and sacred spaces for congregants, and that, most importantly, don't harm vulnerable communities.

By utilizing energy efficient lighting and cooling, designing for multiple use, and using less toxic materials such as environmentally friendly flooring, St. Stephen's was able to decrease their carbon pollution and become the first LEED-certified (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) church. Today, the church stands as a testament to the congregation's commitment to protecting God's creation by using less energy, cutting their carbon emissions, and relying on less toxic building materials.

Reverend Cory Sparks was similarly inspired and at a time of great difficulty no less. Hurricane Katrina destroyed or damaged 900 houses of worship in the Gulf Region. It also wreaked havoc on the United Methodist Church that Rev. Sparks served in New Orleans. But, it also provided an opportunity. Rev. Sparks, with a long-time interest in "greening" churches, used the opportunity of renovation and reconstruction in his congregation and other congregations in the area to push for energy-efficient design and materials. He recognized a need for pastors and church leaders to get more technical information on energy efficiency and was able to secure a small grant to help resource these interested congregations in New Orleans.

Now, with the help of a couple of AmeriCorp volunteers, churches in New Orleans are able to get energy audits and make needed repairs and changes to their existing structures. This not only helps reduce carbon emissions, but also helps reduce overall church operating expenses. And saving money can be critical to ministries that are struggling to get back on their feet after Hurricane Katrina.

Joining Voices for Justice

One way that religious leaders and people of faith are making a difference is by educating elected officials on the need to address global climate change and to do so in a way that helps protect vulnerable populations and people in poverty in the U.S. and abroad. Last December during the UN Climate Change Conference of the Kyoto Protocol, a record number of people of faith, coordinated by the World Council of Churches, descended upon Canada to voice their concern that the United States and the rest of the world address climate change with all haste. This gathering included three inter-religious events and the development of a religious statement that expressed the spiritual and ethical dimensions of climate change. The statement called for urgent action especially since vulnerable people and eco-systems have already experienced the impact of climate change.

Here in the United States, the faith community is speaking out to Congress, articulating four moral imperatives when addressing climate change: stewardship of God's creation, sufficiency for all God's people, justice for God's people, and sustainability for all of God's creation. In October 2007, the Evangelical Environmental Network, the Catholic Coalition on Climate Change, the Coalition on the Environment and Jewish Life, and the National Council of Churches joined together to release a policy agenda paper to members of Congress that advocates for the need to protect low-income and vulnerable people in climate change legislation. This unlikely coalition was a reminder that these groups share a common concern for God's Earth and for people living in poverty as they face the impacts of global warming.

No matter what region of the country you examine, you will find increased interest and action by the faith community to address global climate change. By taking action in their own houses of worship and in their own homes -- living lives that use less carbon - people of faith become examples to the rest of the community. By speaking out -- giving voice to the voiceless -- people of faith become prophets and teachers to the world. As with any impending crisis, theological differences are often set aside as we strive to seek solutions and institute a more sustainable, just world as we believe God intended.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: religion, environment, climate change, religious left

Cassandra Carmichael is the eco-justice program director at the National Council of Churches and a contributor to Foreign Policy In Focus.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
UU's on board
Posted by: DrXyzzy on Dec 17, 2007 2:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
See also the Unitarian Universalist Green Sanctuary Program.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People react when someone they know is hurt
Posted by: PaulK on Dec 17, 2007 8:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sorry that we don't treat the stranger as well as we treat ourselves, but we don't.

However, I live near the coastline. If the West Antarctic ice sheet weakens, breaks up and floats away into the ocean some January, my sister's house could flood. So could Patrice's ex-lover's house. So could our whole downtown. A super-hurricane would also do the same deed.

I don't know anyone from the nation of Bangladesh, which will probably disappear someday leaving 100 million nationless people. I can only feel for them by looking around at my own friends and community which might disappear too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Green" religion is a contradiction in terms
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Dec 19, 2007 3:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reference the book: "The Long Summer" by Brian Fagan. WHEN civilization
falls, you will give up your present religion because you will finally realize that
your preacher is a charlatan and your god is imaginary. It has been proven
experimentally that praying accomplishes nothing. Just before the final collapse,
you may be involved in a huge religious ceremony. The ceremony will not call
forth the god you thought would save you. Instead, the ceremony will waste the
last of your resources, resources that you could have used to move away in search
of food for your family. In the end, you may kill your preacher for betraying you.
Your preacher has always betrayed you. 99% of all people will die in the collapse
of civilization. You will not be among the survivors.

The bad news is that, if you survive, you will pick up some other equally
nonsensical religion. Religions are all about the same. All religions are nonsense
generated by the undesigned brain of man. Reference: "The Accidental Mind" by
David J. Linden, 2007 Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Religion is
caused by the extreme klugeyness of the "designed" by evolution brain. In
particular, the narrative creation system cannot be turned off. It generates false
narratives that are believed by the generating person. This is seen in experiments
done in the laboratory. This book has the best explanation of resistance to
evolution: "There has also been an assumption that if one accepts the idea that life
developed without divine intervention, it necessarily follows that all aspects of
religious thought must be rejected. Those who take this line of argument to
extremes argue that when religious thought is rejected moral and social codes will
degenerate and "the law of the jungle" will be all that is left. It is imagined by
religious fundamentalists that those who do not share their particular religious faith
are incapable of leading moral lives." These suppositions are not true many times
over. Linden later mentions that the creationists [intelligent design advocates] are
exactly 180 degrees wrong rather than just a little wrong. Being exactly wrong,
they are unable to unlearn their error. See Sociobiology or Sciobio.

If you truly want to save yourself from the collapse of civilization and possible
extinction, give up religion now and learn science. Science is not a religion.
Science is a method and process of disproving the false and finding truth.
Religion is easy. Anybody can become a member of any religion. Religion is
taken on faith, usually in the preacher or some ancient nonsensical text. Science is
hard. Science is never taken on faith. Science requires real work on the part of
those who practice it.

"Green" religion is a contradiction in terms. The greenest thing that can be done
with churches is to tear them down and replace them with schools and laboratories.
It is only by science that the collapse of civilization and the extinction of Homo
Sapiens can be avoided.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE2: "Green" religion is a contradiction in terms
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Dec 24, 2007 12:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In "The Long Summer" by Brian Fagan, he discusses 2 or 3 dozen civilizations
that have fallen because of climate changes that were smaller than the climate
change that we have already made. "Collapse, How Societies Choose to Fail or
Succeed" by Jared Diamond discusses an additional dozen societies, some extinct,
others now on local brinks. The proper action to avoid more global warming is
not being taken. Atlanta, Georgia and a belt all the way around the earth at that
latitude is experiencing drought already and it will only get worse. Read "Six
Degrees" by Mark Lynos. Conclusion: OUR civilization has a 90% chance of
failing, unless the next president of the US takes really drastic action. That is an
unacceptably high risk. Read "Collapse, How Societies Choose to Fail or
Succeed" by Jared Diamond to find out just how bad times could get if civilization
collapses. Expect to not survive a collapse of civilization. We should
immediately start with replacing all coal fired power plants with nuclear power
plants worldwide, and finish the job by 2015. If this is not done, our chances of
going EXTINCT are entirely too high. Read "Six Degrees" by Mark Lynos again.
Therefore, "When" civilization crashes is entirely logical, not a form of faith.

Religion has contributed to the collapse of many civilizations in the past.
Christianity contributed to the collapse of the Greenland Viking civilization
according to that book by Jared Diamond. I had not read enough of Dr.
Diamond's book at the time of my previous post to say this. There were other
contributions to the collapse of the Greenland Viking civilization, such as climate
change.

By "narrative creation system" David J. Linden in "The Accidental Mind" did not
mean hallucinations or mental "unquietness." Dr. Linden meant that people try to
understand things whether they have the necessary means or not. If they don't
have proper means, meaning science, they use nonsensical methods such as
religion to "understand" things. Nonsensical means of understanding leads to
superstition and religion. People say crazy things like: "God works in wondrous
ways" or "The Devil made him do it."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE3 Green Religion
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Dec 24, 2007 12:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Religion is caused by any one or more of about half a dozen mental illnesses.
The truth about religion and ethics can be found in these books:

"The Science of Good and Evil" by Michael Shermer, 2004 "Morality and Ethics
are now in the jurisdiction of Science and greatly improved thereby." See also
several hundred books in the new science called "Sociobiology" or "Sciobio":
Morals and ethics are instinctive and they evolved. Morals and ethics will soon
have equations. Ethical answers will soon be computable.

"The Neuropsychological bases of god beliefs" Dr. Michael A. Persinger MD,
psychiatrist 1987 "Religious people are just like my temporal lobe patients"

"The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bi-Cameral Mind" Julian
Jaynes Professor, Harvard University 1976 "Religious people are just like
schizophrenic patients"

"The Psychiatric Interview in Clinical Practice" Roger A. MacKinnon, M.D.,
Robert Michels, M.D. W. B. Saunders Co. 1971 "Religiosity is a common
symptom [of] schizophrenic patients"

"The God delusion" by Richard Dawkins. "Religion is caused by a kind of
computer virus that infects the living computer, the human brain."

"God: The Failed Hypothesis" byVictor Stenger Scientific proof that god does
not exist.

"The God Part of the Brain" by Matthew Alper 1996. "The USA is anomolusly
religious because many early founder groups were religiously insane and fleeing
prosecution in Europe. Religion is a genetic disorder."

"The Accidental Mind" by David J. Linden, 2007 Belknap Press of Harvard
University Press. Religion is caused by the extreme klugeyness of the "designed"
by evolution brain. In particular, the narrative creation system cannot be turned
off. It generates false narratives that are believed by the generating person. This is
seen in experiments done in the laboratory. This book has the best explanation of
resistance to evolution: "There has also been an assumption that if one accepts the
idea that life developed without divine intervention, it necessarily follows that all
aspects of religious thought must be rejected. Those who take this line of
argument to extremes argue that when religious thought is rejected moral and
social codes will degenerate and "the law of the jungle" will be all that is left. It is
imagined by religious fundamentalists that those who do not share their particular
religious faith are incapable of leading moral lives." These suppositions are not
true many times over. Linden later mentions that the creationists [intelligent
design advocates] are exactly 180 degrees wrong rather than just a little wrong.
Being exactly wrong, they are unable to unlearn their error. See Sociobiology or
Sciobio.

"Origins of the Modern Mind" by Merlin Donald 1991 "So what did you expect
from a brain that is based on the Chimpanzee brain? Furthermore, the 4 Million
years it took to go from chimp brain to "human" brain is much too short for
Nature to get the bugs worked out."

"Manufacturing Belief" by Lewis Wolpert
http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2007/05/15/lewis_wolpert/

"Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon", by Daniel Dennett
Let's do scientific research on religion and find out what causes it.

Other authors: Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE4 green religion. More proof that religion is nonsense.
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Dec 24, 2007 12:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a sophomore undergraduate student in Physics, your homework may include
figuring out when the second coming would be required, assuming that the bible
was 100% true in the year zero. That is, when would the bible be down to 50%
true? The popular and professors' answer in 1965 was the year 500. The true
answer: A friend of mine was born and raised in Budapest, Hungary. As an adult,
he came here and stayed. After 25 years, he visited his home town of Budapest.
He was unable to communicate with his high school classmates because the
Hungarian language had changed so much. The correct answer is less than 25
years. The first gospel was not written down until 50 years after the alleged
events and then in a different language. The people who told the story were at
about the same level of civilization as "wild Indians", I mean Native Americans
before Columbus got here. We have all played or seen played the game called
"Telephone" in which a story is passed down a line of re-tellers. By the Sixth re-
telling, the story has no resemblance to the original. The gospel story had to have
been re-told at least 6 times before it was mis-translated the first time. [Note that
whoever wrote it down the first time was free to write whatever he wanted to.
The storytellers were illiterate and unable to check his written text by reading it.
Besides that, he wrote in Greek rather than Aramaic.] Conclusion: There is no
truth anywhere in the bible, and there never was. There is no way to know what
"jesus" or "mohamed" or any other such character actually said or did.

ALL of the jurisdictions that were formerly in the jurisdiction of religion have
been taken over by Science. There is no longer a need to debate the issue.
Religion is an unfortunate side effect of a major and ongoing step in evolution.
[Not that evolution has a predetermined direction. We could devolve, but we have
to get over religion or go extinct. "God" will not save us from the consequences
of global warming or an asteroid impact because there is no such critter as "god.".]
Ethics and morality are instinctive, not derived from religion. Female instinct has
greater force in morality than male instinct because the female is in command of
the sexual encounter. Look up "Sociobiology". The origin of the Universe is the
subject of Cosmology which is part of astronomy which is part of the science of
physics.
Religion is a SCAM. ANY religion, there are 10,000 to choose from at any one
time. People keep inventing new religions [for the benefit of the "prophet," of
course] and forgetting other religions. ALL preachers, priests, imams, rabbis,
iatolas, etc. belong in jail for "grand theft, bunko type".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

why the attacks on this post?
Posted by: whiteknuckled on Jan 9, 2008 1:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's really dismaying to see that a story like this can't be posted on Alternet without being mercilessly bashed by others. There's really nothing controversial here, unless you count the fact that other people believe in God or follow a religion, which for the record, puts them in the majority in the U.S. — not the minority.

My point is not that you should believe in God or should not. But the fact that such negative responses follow a positive piece showing how churches and Christians are latching onto environmental issues for moral reasons alarms me.

Honestly, for those here who care about the environment or mitigating climate change, why does it matter to you why others would believe it's a moral imperative?

On the surface, it makes you look like you don't care at all about the issue — more important than finding the solution is bashing those who reached that conclusion in a manner you disagree with.

For a political movement that prides itself on tolerance, these comments reek of intolerance.

Tearing down all churches would be "green?" Do you know how much energy that would take, much less to build something new? And then where would all the millions and millions of people go who still want to attend church and weren't persuaded by your rational argument?

Is it more important that everyone cease belief in all religion, or band together to find a solution to this great problem of our age that will affect everyone? Sadly, your answer to this question sounds pretty clear to me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement