Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Environment

California Needs to Act Now to Avoid a Water Crisis

By Dr. Reese Halter, AlterNet. Posted December 12, 2007.


With an antiquated water system, a growing population, and the pressure of global warming, California is in trouble.
Advertisement

Lawmakers in Sacramento need to understand the role of water in California. An antiquated water system designed for 20 million inhabitants combined with global warming and a burgeoning population are three valid reasons why the legislator must act quickly and decisively.

Currently southern California is experiencing its worst drought since the inception of record keeping in 1877. The 2007 snowpack along the eastern Sierra Nevada's, which supplies up to 90 percent of LA's drinking water, was the second lowest recorded. The Los Angeles Metropolitan Water District is currently buying billions of gallons of water from farmers to secure water for the cities 16 million denizens.

The Hetch-Hetcy reservoir in the heart of the Yosemite National Park draws its water from the Tuolumne River and the snowpack run off from the Sierra Nevada's accounts for 85 percent of the drinking water for the city of San Francisco. Climate modelers from Stanford and UCLA predict that by 2050 summers will be significantly hotter with faster depletion of the snowpacks resulting in reduced supply of water from the Sierras, by at least 35 percent.

Moreover, a 20 year study of the health of the Sierra forests showed that as temperatures have risen over the past two decades, so too has a dramatic mortality rate of sapling and trees induced by drought. Mature forest are very important because amongst other things they help retain snow and they release it slowly in the springtime and filter it as it moves through their roots.

A Smokey Bear fire suppression policy has changed the composition and structure of the forests in California and throughout the West. Tens of millions of white fir and incense cedars now carpet the forest floor throughout our state. Their foliage is highly flammable.

A drier California is more prone to massive wildfires, senseless loss of life and billions of dollars in damages. Recently some 49 homes were incinerated in the Malibu fires. In October, southern California was an inferno.

A warming world has caused the Santa Anna winds, which normally occur from September to January, an opportunity to occur in every month of the year since January 2005. Essentially, our state has been on wildfire alert for the past 23 months.

California has the eight mightiest economy in the world. A $32 billion-a-year intensive agriculture industry soley relies upon a secure water supply to produce food.

Currently California has a population of 37 million people. By 2050 there will be 60 million people residing in our state.

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Senator Don Perata are proposing a water bill that will address restoring the Sacramento and San Joaquin delta, repairing the levees, adding three reservoirs and redoing California's decaying infra-structure in order to accommodate the state well past the middle of this century.

The cost of this project is at least $10 billion. It is a crucial expenditure that our state must incur.

Global warming has brought with it a drier world. Beijing, Perth, Sydney, London and now New York City are faced with having to recycle sewage treatment water for re-use as tap water. Atlanta, a city of 5.5 million people, is within 100 days of running out of fresh drinking water. These are the current realities of rising greenhouse gases.

As California moves into a drier world, the need to secure water for its inhabitants is of paramount importance. The leadership role exemplified by the lawmakers in Sacramento on AB 32 -- a carbon constrained economy is laudable; but now they must act accordingly to ensure water for California's future.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: water, california, global warming, climate change, wildfires, water crisis

Dr. Reese Halter is the founder of Global Forest Science.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Water conservation and recycling
Posted by: brthomas on Dec 12, 2007 7:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I support water conservation, recycling and groundwater recharge as the most rapid and cost-effective solutions for California. Orange County, CA will soon open a giant facility for wastewater recycling and groundwater recharge. Every city in southern California needs one of these. It makes no sense to treat the wastewater and then dump it into the ocean.

More dams would be a Water Policy Debacle for California - BRT Insights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Say NO To The Proposed Water Bill!
Posted by: Jeff Hoffman on Dec 13, 2007 11:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By writing this article, Dr. Reese Halter has acted as a shill for large agribusiness interests that are pushing the proposed water diversion bill. This bill would create more dam(n)s and would divert even more water from its natural areas, most notably from the Delta that flows into San Francisco Bay. To see an environmentalist's perspective on this issue, go to http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/12/07/18465644.php

Please contact your legislators and strongly oppose this plan and any other that removes additional water from our natural waterways. The problem here is caused by overpopulation, wasting water (watering lawns & sidewalks, washing cars, growing non-native plants that need immense amounts of water, etc.), and failing to get water from less environmentally harmful sources, such as desalination. Directly addressing these issues are what should be done, not another environmentally destructive Peripheral Canal, which the voters of California have repeatedly and overwhelmingly rejected.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Our needs are sustainable without dams
Posted by: wrolley on Dec 15, 2007 9:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The California Water Impact Network has published a set of Sustainability Principles that will allow all of California, including the Delta, meet it's needs.

Several Green Party locals have endorsed these principles and I am working to get more to do so. The comments from Dan Bacher and Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla linked from Jeff Hoffman's post are direct and accurate.

About the only thing on which I can agree with Dr. Halter is that we need to act quickly. We need to stop trying to grow federally subsidized cotton in the desert by irrigating it with subsidized water pumped by below market rate electricity. We need politicians to act for all of the people of California rather than trying to play a game of counting votes in the Central Valley.

We probably need an alternative to the current two part song and dance in Sacrament also where both side collect from the same lobbyists. The way this entire show is playing out, with it's non-productive special session of the legislature is the primary reason that I changed my registration to Green.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hackbut
Posted by: hackbut on Dec 17, 2007 5:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It amazes me that there can be an article about the rising population of California needing more water without one word about the effect of illegal immigration into Southern California, a good example of the dishonesty of many left-wing writers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a horribly written article!
Posted by: Rapunzel on Dec 17, 2007 8:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish someone had proofread this article before it was published!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]