Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Read Al Gore’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

By Al Gore, AlterNet. Posted December 12, 2007.


The climate crisis threat is imminent. It is the 11th hour.
Advertisement

SPEECH BY AL GORE ON THE ACCEPTANCE
OF THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE
DECEMBER 10, 2007
OSLO, NORWAY

Your Majesties, Your Royal Highnesses, Honorable members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Excellencies, Ladies and gentlemen.

I have a purpose here today. It is a purpose I have tried to serve for many years. I have prayed that God would show me a way to accomplish it.

Sometimes, without warning, the future knocks on our door with a precious and painful vision of what might be. One hundred and nineteen years ago, a wealthy inventor read his own obituary, mistakenly published years before his death. Wrongly believing the inventor had just died, a newspaper printed a harsh judgment of his life's work, unfairly labeling him "The Merchant of Death" because of his invention -- dynamite. Shaken by this condemnation, the inventor made a fateful choice to serve the cause of peace.

Seven years later, Alfred Nobel created this prize and the others that bear his name.

Seven years ago tomorrow, I read my own political obituary in a judgment that seemed to me harsh and mistaken -- if not premature. But that unwelcome verdict also brought a precious if painful gift: an opportunity to search for fresh new ways to serve my purpose.

Unexpectedly, that quest has brought me here. Even though I fear my words cannot match this moment, I pray what I am feeling in my heart will be communicated clearly enough that those who hear me will say, "We must act."

The distinguished scientists with whom it is the greatest honor of my life to share this award have laid before us a choice between two different futures -- a choice that to my ears echoes the words of an ancient prophet: "Life or death, blessings or curses. Therefore, choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live."

We, the human species, are confronting a planetary emergency -- a threat to the survival of our civilization that is gathering ominous and destructive potential even as we gather here. But there is hopeful news as well: we have the ability to solve this crisis and avoid the worst -- though not all -- of its consequences, if we act boldly, decisively and quickly.

However, despite a growing number of honorable exceptions, too many of the world's leaders are still best described in the words Winston Churchill applied to those who ignored Adolf Hitler's threat: "They go on in strange paradox, decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity, all powerful to be impotent."

So today, we dumped another 70 million tons of global-warming pollution into the thin shell of atmosphere surrounding our planet, as if it were an open sewer. And tomorrow, we will dump a slightly larger amount, with the cumulative concentrations now trapping more and more heat from the sun.

As a result, the earth has a fever. And the fever is rising. The experts have told us it is not a passing affliction that will heal by itself. We asked for a second opinion. And a third. And a fourth. And the consistent conclusion, restated with increasing alarm, is that something basic is wrong.

We are what is wrong, and we must make it right.

Last September 21, as the Northern Hemisphere tilted away from the sun, scientists reported with unprecedented distress that the North Polar ice cap is "falling off a cliff." One study estimated that it could be completely gone during summer in less than 22 years. Another new study, to be presented by U.S. Navy researchers later this week, warns it could happen in as little as 7 years.

Seven years from now.

In the last few months, it has been harder and harder to misinterpret the signs that our world is spinning out of kilter. Major cities in North and South America, Asia and Australia are nearly out of water due to massive droughts and melting glaciers. Desperate farmers are losing their livelihoods. Peoples in the frozen Arctic and on low-lying Pacific islands are planning evacuations of places they have long called home. Unprecedented wildfires have forced a half million people from their homes in one country and caused a national emergency that almost brought down the government in another. Climate refugees have migrated into areas already inhabited by people with different cultures, religions, and traditions, increasing the potential for conflict. Stronger storms in the Pacific and Atlantic have threatened whole cities. Millions have been displaced by massive flooding in South Asia, Mexico, and 18 countries in Africa. As temperature extremes have increased, tens of thousands have lost their lives. We are recklessly burning and clearing our forests and driving more and more species into extinction. The very web of life on which we depend is being ripped and frayed.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: climate crisis, environment, global warming, climate change, nobel prize, al gore

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
get egos out of the picture
Posted by: aislinnluv on Dec 12, 2007 4:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and ban vehicles like hummers. auto manufacturers have been given a free pass for far too long. as far back as 1952, a car was made that got a whopping 34 mpg - the kaiser henry j. true, it was a basic car, no real frills, but even today there are more cars being manufactured that can't meet that standard than cars that can and do. no one needs to go 120+ mph. speed only increases risk. it's purely ego (read: machismo) that spurs the desire for higher speed and more horsepower. when we have the ability to "travel" for work in the ether, the requirements for vehicular transport have changed and it follows that we can and should give up the old ideas about the cars we drive. mandate it, now. there are so many benefits to be realized from the changes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: get egos out of the picture Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: get egos out of the picture Posted by: willymack
Al Gore is a NWO globalist and an errand boy for the UN.
Posted by: futurefarm on Dec 12, 2007 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His "job" is to secure a permanent revenue stream for the Bilderberg planned, UN based global control establishment. He works with the corporate media to convince US to "stand down" in the face of permanent international taxes like the carbon tax. Quite frankly, he is a traitor and a liar. I recommend Jim Tucker's new book Bilderberg Diary. We are being "set up" to pay and pay to "clean up" the third world corporate disasters (global warming, etc.) with our taxes instead of helping ourselves thrive as a unique and sovereign community.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What BS Posted by: MeridaLady
» RE: What BS Posted by: futurefarm
» No BS Posted by: dover23
» RE: No BS Posted by: futurefarm
i'm flying across country to see family for my winter break
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Dec 12, 2007 6:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i'm flying across country during winter break to see family....
it's horrible to have to evaluate every single action as "helping the planet" or "hurting the planet." my flight is killing the planet. i'm a bad human. it's my fault the ice caps are melting....

it really sucks to be aware of this every minute of every day.

at least i didn't have kids and eat low on the food chain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Environment - We are on Death Bed
Posted by: imaninfo@sltnet.lk on Dec 12, 2007 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Al-Gore's comments on environment is correct. To the extent I have read this may perhaps be the last century. Man's greed has overtaken the destiny of mother earth. With the tragic Tsunami we will continue to witness more and more natural disasters. While the North Pole is melting, South Pole continues to become heavier and heavier. The axis will tilt anytime from now on. We have realised this sad phenomena to late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Has anybody really LISTENED to what Al Gore
Posted by: willymack on Dec 12, 2007 8:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has said and is saying? He doesn't offer any magic solution or panacea to our manifold, self-inflicted problems. His rich command of our language says it all, if you take the time to digest and analyze what he says. 1. We're poisoning the earth to the extent where it will no longer be capable of sustaining our life as we know it. 2. Our population is too large and is growing anyway. It hardly matters that some nations have acted responsibly to halt their growth; the WORLD POPULATION IS EXPLODING, and this is dangerous. 3. The power to do anything about this is weilded by a few greedy bastards who couldn't care less about humanity or our Mother Earth. As I said, Gore isn't offering any instant solution to these problems; he's merely stating that WE MUST BEGIN LOOKING FOR REAL AND LASTING SOLUTIONS, and the sooner, the better. Now, who do you believe should run the show-the bushies-or someone like Al Gore? We all know (or should by now) what the bushies have done for us all. Isn't it time for something different and more positive?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Love children? Want to parent? Posted by: veggiegrrrl
I'm still looking for an answer
Posted by: EdinIowa on Dec 12, 2007 11:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not a right-wing idiot or a Gore basher, far from it. If Gore yet sees fit to get in the race I'm ready to support him.

BUT - and let's just take Gore out of the equation altogether - I still want to know how in the hell a 10,000 sq ft home manages to use over 220,000 KWhrs of energy in a year!?!

Think about it - how is this even possible? No one's even tried to answer it, it's just fighting from the left and right. It's an insane amount - over 18,000 kw per month for a home of 10,000 sq ft. There's an awful lot of 2000 sq ft homes out there using 1200 - 1500 kws a month, and far less with a liitle effort. Why is this 10,000 sq ft home (5 times larger) using more than 10 times as much energy? And it's not electric heating - he has a natural gas bill.

It's a fair question and it's not coming from the right when I ask it. It's coming from someone who conserves and has reduced my own electric usage in my own modest less than 1000 sq ft home down to less then 400 kws a month. And I still have an electric water heater.

So dammit, I want to know, how does a 10,000 sq ft 'mansion' use 18,000 kws a month? We should all want to know. Does he have electric water heaters in every room set to 200 degrees? A window AC in half the windows. A basement filled with grow lights, what? And if it's not just Gore's, if all the 10,000 sq ft homes are wasting at this rate (and they're not) - and all those new mcmansions popping up everywhere - then we better start torching them because we will never get away from more and more coal-fired power plants no matter how many carbon offsets you can buy.

And I'm not picking on Gore, but dammit, he's put himself out there on this subject and the technology exists to have even a 10,000 sq ft home that could be a model of efficiency and serve as a beacon to say YES you can live comfortable AND efficiently and consume LESS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

shivering
Posted by: zooeyhall on Dec 12, 2007 11:26 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right now, I am in the midwest and shivering through one of the coldest and snowiest Decembers in years.

I have been a farmer for 35 years, and if there is one thing about the weather I can tell you is that it will be extreme and unpredictable.

To take something as uncertain and unpredictable as the weather and use it to advocate drastic claims and draconian laws is crazy. I strongly suspect that someone stands to gain something either politically or financially from all this global warming freaking.

Some of these global warming people---all I can say is that I think global warming is the Left's equivalent of the Right-wing's Rapture or End Times.

Years down the road, people will laugh at this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: shivering Posted by: EdinIowa
» RE: shivering Posted by: ibzear
» RE: shivering Posted by: PaulK
» RE: shivering Posted by: halg
Too LATE - Move Away From the Coastlines
Posted by: sofla100 on Dec 12, 2007 3:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Bush assumed power in 2000, the die was cast on Global Warming. America would pay no attention to it, and in fact, might even relax pollution controls to benefit big business concerns. What has happened? Now they say the Artic ice is melting at an "uncontrollable rate." Now, it may not take 10 years, or perhaps it will take 50 or more years, but the oceans are rising. This will place the cities of Boston, Miami, New York City, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and several others at least partly or completely under water. The other changes, who knows fully what they are? But, for Bush and company, global warming still is just a "liberal dream," and they are doing nothing. My suggestion, move away from the coastlines, get out at least by the end of this decade if you can. After that, the value of the property in these cities will start to disintegrate rapidly, as thousands and then millions try to get out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ha ha ha ha Posted by: veggiegrrrl
That's Why America Has Done Nothing
Posted by: sofla100 on Dec 12, 2007 3:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because of what you say, America has done nothing. In fact, America has tried to short circuit and subvert any laws or attention to global warming at all. The official position is that it really does not exist. When NASA or other government scientists try to say anything about it, they are silenced and sent to outer slabovia. But say, how long have you been farming? Did you farm in the Midwest over a decade ago? Do you know what the concept of higher highs and higher lows means relative to average annual temperatures? I suggest doing some math on this. Then you will find that even if this year is the coldest on record, it doesn't make up for the past 10. The problem won't go away that easy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Influence
Posted by: Nedtheredhead on Dec 12, 2007 4:49 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the 24th Nov 2007 a significant event occurred.
Australian PM John Howard got kicked out of office and kicked out of his own electorate. What most Americans don't know is John Howard was a regular visitor to Bush's Crawford ranch and it is believed had far more influence over Bush's decisions than half those that voted for him. The Australian Liberal Party's Linton Crosby was 'lent' to Bush to assist in his last election, and remained there till this year when he returned to try to save Howard's arse. Linton Crosby couldn't lay straight in bed even if he used railways sleepers for splints.
Howard had been replaced by Kevin Rudd and already, in less than three weeks, Kevin has ratified Australia's Kyoto agreement, something Howard, along with Bush, refused to do, has presented himself to Bali with three of his new ministers, has started reviewing our energy use and how best to reduce green house emissions, and plans to stop giving away our inventions to American corporates who never ever admit their inventions are not their own.
Watch how Bush has become almost paralysed, and will continue to do so, as the time slips further away since Howard's demise.
I hope you get a decent leader as we have in your up coming election.

On a slightly separate note, I have been receiving emails from Alternet showing what is happening here. I don't know if that is because I haven't been coming as much as I used to or if it is a promotional email. My suggestion to Alternet is to remember the world is a lot bigger than the US. Other nations have a very big say in how the world is run, and the US is just a small part.
For example, the new Aussie PM, who speaks fluent mandarin, had already spoke personally with the Chinese leaders, and had done more to influence their stance on their pollution problems than any other leader...and he has only be in office less than three weeks.
Maybe Alternet you could start to get your reporters to look at how the world out side of the US is going. With the current stories, and the stories you continue to post here, you don't help stem your country's egocentricity one little bit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ain't that Progress???
Posted by: talkville on Dec 13, 2007 12:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I have a purpose here today. It is a purpose I have tried to serve for many years. I have prayed that God would show me a way to accomplish it."

No doubt climate-changes, inextricably connected with global capitalism in the economic sphere, the rise of fascist and authoritarian modes of government (cybernetics anyone?) in the political sphere and the obsessive impulse towards restoration of theological and metaphysical modes of being in the religious sphere are all imminent and expanding elements in our social relations -- local and global.

So now, after about 50 or so years, we get another Clock in "the 11th hour". As a "boomer" I grew up beneath the AEC Nuclear Threat Clock -- ticking away, a second at a time; now, in the waning years of my life I watch the mounting of another Clock upon the wall next to it (I have no doubt it will receive a Name soon!).

Who speaks behind the Curtain these words of Apocalypsis? And, on the ground, what is actually occurring to that reified, corrupted and thoroughly devalued category "civilization"?

How progressive these conditions in their development for some; for many more others? Well, that's an open question.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

float away
Posted by: ibzear on Dec 13, 2007 2:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You belong to the majority wearing blinders, as though you can do nothing but be floatsome, instead of standing up and working for a solution. Sorry it means getting involved with reality, and possibly making a difference in our outcome= (future).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Our very survival is at stake - not mere "civilization"!!!
Posted by: Cathyc on Dec 14, 2007 1:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
n/m

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I will when I feel like going to sleep.
Posted by: MobileSucks on Dec 14, 2007 2:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Screw Gorbot. He lost his own election losers. And well, the asshole Repug Court finished his sorry ass off.

Dems, pick a better candidate this time or lose again. (Clinton wont win.)

What will come of all this new awareness of global warming? Nuclear Power plants and hardly any other real changes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]