Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Eating Vegetarian Is Taking Global Warming Personally

By Kathy Freston, Huffington Post. Posted November 30, 2007.


If you want to decrease you carbon footprint, you can start with your dinner plate.
Advertisement

After the tradition of Thanksgiving overindulgence, wouldn't it be nice if we had a good reason other than vanity to start eating healthfully, some other incentive to help us get on a better track in the wellness arena? Luckily, the United Nations just gave us one.

The U.N.'s latest report on global warming has bad news and good news. On the downside, a lot of scary stuff is heading for us at breakneck speed. On the upside, we still have time to do something about it -- and one thing we can all do is actually fun and delicious.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a panel of thousands of the world's top climate scientists, has described the existence of human-caused global warming in its final assessment report as both "unequivocal," and as having "abrupt and irreversible" effects on global climate. Worse still, these effects are coming stronger and faster than expected in the panel's last report just six years ago. Alarmingly, some effects that had been predicted to arrive decades from now are already here.

The report warns that hundreds of millions of people are threatened with starvation, flooding, and weather disasters. Rain-fed crop production will fall by half, a quarter of the world's species will go extinct, and arctic ice will completely disappear during the summer. We will see more deadly heat waves, stronger hurricanes, and island nations completely obliterated from the map by rising sea levels.

And the good news is...?

Fortunately, there's still time to save ourselves -- but not very much time. The U.N. says point blank: "immediate action is vital." According to the report, we have just a few more years left to avoid the worst effects of global warming.

A problem of such scale will require governments, industries, and private citizens to work together to address what many believe to be the greatest challenge of our time. As with most solutions, the approach must be varied and come from all angles to really make the kind of quantum difference that is necessary. Here's but one -- albeit one of the most powerful -- way to add to the momentum of a turnaround: eat a plant based diet. Give up eating animals and go vegetarian. Seriously.

A U.N. report from just this past November found that a full 18 percent of global warming emissions come from raising chickens, turkeys, pigs, and other animals for food. That's about 40 percent more than all the cars, trucks, airplanes, and all other forms of transport combined (13 percent). It's also more than all the homes and offices in the world put together (8 percent).

So, one of the simplest and most elemental (and most delicious) things you can do to decrease your carbon footprint is to choose a veggie burger over a hamburger, "un-chicken" patties (try Garden Protein, the new and much talked about faux chicken/turkey) over actual chicken, or some grilled Portobello mushrooms with marinated tofu (I swear it's really good!). Order the vegetarian option whenever you go out to a restaurant -- and ask everywhere you go that they expand the vegetarian section on their menu, since it's good for owners of restaurants, hotels, airlines, etc. to know that there is consumer interest for tasty plant-based entrees.

I'm all for participating in the myriad things we can do to assist turning back the tide on human-made global warming: writing to a corporation about being environmentally responsible, turning off unnecessary lights and keeping the heat or a.c. on "low", voting for the politicians who will lead us into cleaner living, and driving a smaller more fuel efficient car. But on an ongoing more fundamental level, we can make a huge shift by simply eating differently. Being vegetarian is being green.

Eating a plant-based diet isn't just kind to animals and good for your health (and waistline!), it is also the single most effective thing you can do to reduce your carbon footprint.

We can each think creatively about how to use our roles in our families, jobs, and social circles, and join as part of the solution to this serious global threat.

With so much at stake, it's the least we can do. After all, the U.N. says there's still time if we act now. Surely that's something to be thankful for.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: global warming, climate change, vegetarian, vegetarianism

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Why is it always an either/or?
Posted by: YogiBear on Nov 30, 2007 12:38 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not that I have a problem with vegetarianism -- I really don't, it's just that the kind of factory farming that wastes incredible resources is the real problem, not eating animals. People are gonna eat meat.

Even if the world as a whole decides to switch over, it's not going to happen quick enough to meet these goals. So why not encourage the reduction of factory farms. Why not encourage people to eat free range and organic and to lessen their indulgence of meat instead of stop it?

Is it because you secretly want the earth made uninhabitable for humans? Maybe it's because you've got this point to prove about going veggie and no amount of moderation is going to stop you from making it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh, and did I mention? Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» tribes. . . Posted by: YogiBear
» Funny! I was just going to post Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» No it wouldn't help at all. Posted by: dwilliamsamh
» Cows need plants to grow Posted by: ccano
» Going veg is easy! Posted by: ramsey
» That was good. Thanks for the laugh! Posted by: dwilliamsamh
» Re-read my post.... Posted by: dwilliamsamh
» RE: Why is it always an either/or? Posted by: TopangaRose
» How dare you? Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: How dare you? Posted by: YogiBear
» Absolutely! Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» Eat less meat! Or none at all! Posted by: heidiparker
» Yes! Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» Meat-eaters, stop whining! Posted by: MauraM.
» Who's whining...? Posted by: mjabele
» That makes no sense... Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» It makes perfect sense... Posted by: mjabele
» T-bone Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: Who's whining...? Posted by: sufimarie
» Good news! Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: But is ISN'T an either/or! Posted by: Snowpuppy
» RE: But is ISN'T an either/or! Posted by: YogiBear
Eating vegetarian is taking overpopulation lightly.
Posted by: utilitarianist on Nov 30, 2007 12:39 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not going to eat 500 grams of lentils a day just so that we can cram another 10 billion people onto this planet. At least at the moment we have the choice not to over-use resources, when world population enters 8 digits we may have to ask people to starve to prevent deforestation and pollution problems.

I for one prefer to live in a world of 3 billion people eating meat and living sustainably than a world of 10 billion people who live in an unsustainable economy which needs food rationning to prevent widespread starvation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» 11 digits... Posted by: utilitarianist
» Typical example Posted by: packofwolves
» But... Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» A very good point... Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» Here in the US Posted by: WhuThe?!?
less meat OK
Posted by: richholland on Nov 30, 2007 1:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The people of the Lisotribes in north east asia
eat mainly no meat.
At chinese newyear the family hog, during the year on sunday sometimes a chicken, maybe friday some fish.
Although a vegetarian in a hummer is less offensive to global warming then a pedestrian to his daily hamburger a little bit moderation is OK, why not consider meat as something special because it is made from a living creature??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Everyone is different Posted by: jbur816
» RE: veryone is different Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: veryone is different Posted by: jbur816
» enough Posted by: vasumurti
» RE: enough Posted by: MAD
» RE: enough Posted by: vasumurti
I eat vegetarians exclusively
Posted by: matti on Nov 30, 2007 1:34 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vegetarians consistently provide me with the kind of lean, juicy meat my body thrives on.

While you do, of course, have to pay attention to which particular "vegetable" diet they maintain in order to avoid excessivly fatty, or their opposite, woefully malnourished, specimens, Vegetarian Meat is reliably less "gamey" and "tough" than comparable cuts of "non-vegetarian" meat.

Domestication of Vegetarians is also a much more reasonable venture than of "non-vegetarians". Vegetarians being, on the whole much more docile, co-operative, and cognitively "slower", and thus much more apt to respond to the "shepherd/flock" paradigm.

I mean seriously, you could eat your cat, sure. But try repeating this, buying new ones, they'll catch on -believe me I've tried.

Vegetarians NEVER seem to catch on.

Finally once you've gotten them all settled down into their pens, you can use your Vegetarian's Shit As Compost! Grow more "vegetables" to fatten them up for your feastin' pleasure.

Can't do that with "Non-veggies", can you?


So take it from an old feller who's in the Know,

Make the Switch,

Eat ONLY Vegetarians from this day forward,



You'll be helping your Planet, your Country, and your Self.

-matti

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I eat vegetarians exclusively Posted by: packofwolves
» RE: I eat vegetarians exclusively Posted by: Squarehead
» Thank you darlin' Posted by: matti
» LMAO Posted by: Axiom69
» You've Redefined the 'Manwich'... Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» I don't know... Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: I don't know... Posted by: Axiom69
» I guarantee you Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» Vegetarians live longer Posted by: YogiBear
What I eat is not the problem
Posted by: GrassRoutes on Nov 30, 2007 5:02 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am tired of vegetarians inferring or coming right out and saying I am cruel for eating meat, if I choose so. I am tired of vegetarians pointing their righteous finger at people who choose to eat meat. Eating meat is not the problem, as other readers leaving comments point out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nothing to do with cruelty Posted by: veloce09
» Also... Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: Nothing to do with cruelty Posted by: veloce09
» RE: Nothing to do with cruelty Posted by: TheLimit
» RE: Nothing to do with cruelty Posted by: YogiBear
» So...your point? Posted by: WhuThe?!?
Why I am a vegetarian
Posted by: TwinsFanatic on Nov 30, 2007 5:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Slaughterhouses are perhaps the most violent places on the planet. Animals are routinely sent kicking and screaming through the skinning and dismemberment process, every one bleeding and dying exactly like they would if they were human beings.

Farms today treat animals like so many boxes in a warehouse, chopping off beaks and tails and genitals with no painkillers at all, inflicting third degree burns (branding), ripping out teeth, and hunks of flesh.

Animals transported to slaughter routinely die from the heat or the cold, or freeze to the sides of the transport trucks or to the bottom in their own excrement. Dairy cows and egg laying hens endure the same living nightmare as their brethren who are raised for their flesh, except that their time on the "farm" is longer. They are still shipped to the slaughterhouse and killed, at a fraction of their natural life span.

There is simply no excuse for anyone who considers herself or himself to be an ethical human being, let alone an "animal lover," to be supporting these kinds of practices, all of which are routine and universal throughout the industries which turn animals into eggs and meat and dairy products.

If I can't watch it happening, I want no part of it. I enjoy watching fields tilled and love picking apples and tomatoes and carrots and other vegetarian products. If slaughterhouses had glass walls, as Paul McCartney is so fond of saying, we would all be vegetarians.

Every time I sit down to eat, I make a decision about who I am in the world: Do I want to add to the level of violence, misery, and bloodshed in the world? Or, do I want to make a compassionate and merciful choice?

There is so much violence in the world, from war torn regions of Africa and Europe, to our own inner cities. Most of this violence is difficult to understand, let alone influence.

Veganism is one area where each and every one of us can make a difference, every time we sit down to eat. I find it empowering that I can make an option for peace and compassion every time I eat, simply by not encouraging violence and misery against animals.

Visit www.Meat.org to see how meat is made.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why I am a vegetarian Posted by: DCBeltway
» RE: Why I am a vegetarian Posted by: Green&BearIt
» Oh, Boy, Here We Go Again! Posted by: grumble-bum
» RE: Why I am a vegetarian Posted by: TheLimit
There are other alternatives
Posted by: AndyF on Nov 30, 2007 5:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Living in a rural area, I find it hard to believe that my carbon footprint will be reduced by eating a veggie burger produced from soybeans grown over a thousand miles away, processed in a plant several hundred miles away and then frozen and distributed in refrigerated trucks to my local store compared to eating a hamburger produced from a grass raised bull calf raised by a farmer 10 miles from my home and processed at a local slaughterhouse 15 miles from my home. Eating local is a viable option for many, eating less is also an option, but the promotion of highly processed foods as being morally and ecologically superior and the failure to recognize as reasonable an alternative such as locally grown meat is silly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There are other alternatives Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: There are other alternatives Posted by: planethonker
Big mistake
Posted by: Gravitas on Nov 30, 2007 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For vegitarians to capitalize on global warming. People will just tend to associate it with other lefty tangents and turn off the whole issue. Personally I am a flextarian, and it is the scary religious zeal of veggies that turns me off the movement. It is fine though to include eating less meat as one way to reduce CO2 output. I also question those stats. My student did oral reports this week. Several did green design and energy consumption by buildings came in much higer than what the article stated!

p.s. As for it being good for one's waistline, talk to all the fat vegrtarins out there. Like the ones who drop off veggie boards and clubs because the are told they can't exist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Big mistake Posted by: audiodef
» RE: Big mistake Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» RE: Big mistake Posted by: jbur816
» RE: Big mistake Posted by: spyderbaby
Wow.
Posted by: MP81 on Nov 30, 2007 5:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an environmentalist, the "People will always eat meat" excuse really hits home with me. Isn't environmentalism about both making personal changes to better the Earth and encouraging others to do so? How is going vegetarian--or encouraging others to go vegetarian--any different than not buying a Hummer, and encouraging others to not buy Hummers. Or buying energy efficient lightbulbs and encouraging others to do so, too? Perhaps people see it as too inconvenient (though anyone who's gone vegetarian in recent years will attest to the fact that it is extremely easy), and so try to justify not doing it by saying its not important. But that's no different than trying to discredit global warming because you really want to continue driving a Hummer, or you really don't want to have to switch your lightbulbs. The science clear. Its time to stop making excuses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wow. Posted by: audiodef
» RE: Wow. Posted by: veloce09
» RE: Wow. Posted by: dudelette
» RE: Wow. Posted by: veloce09
» RE: Wow. Posted by: dudelette
» RE: Wow. Posted by: TheLimit
» RE: Wow. Posted by: maestra
» "Extremely easy"? Posted by: mjabele
» RE: "Extremely easy"? Posted by: YogiBear
Actually....
Posted by: audiodef on Nov 30, 2007 5:49 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are two things wrong with stating that going vegetarian will reduce carbon dioxide emissions. It just doesn't paint the full picture. 1. What about the time-tested way of consuming animals by hunting for them and preparing them over fire? We're always going to need fire, so that doesn't count towards CO2 emissions, and if society ever goes under, everyone who wants to eat will do this at some point. 2. The Islamic way of preparing food from animals requires that it be done quickly, painlessly, and by hand, and there are thus no CO2 emissions resulting from that method. It's like of like point 1, wouldn't you say?

Not to say that vegetarian diets are bad - they're great, and I don't eat much meat myself. I used to be a vegetarian and that was probably the healthiest time of my life. My girlfriend is one herself. So it's definitely a good thing. My point is that this article does not include a fully informed point of view for those who have no trouble with meat (and some who need it for dietary reasons).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Actually.... Posted by: flaghfine
» RE: Actually.... Posted by: PumbyUmpkin
» No, she's not. Posted by: Coleman
» RE: Actually.... Posted by: TheLimit
LMAO
Posted by: Axiom69 on Nov 30, 2007 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The best part is they taste like chicken!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: LMAO Posted by: Axiom69
More crap from Alternet
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Nov 30, 2007 6:11 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alternet wants to talk about the environmental impacts of diet. Nothing wrong with that. Alternet seems to think the only solution to push is to stop eating meat. Screw you! I hunt deer, pheasant and grouse. I gut and drain them with my own two hands. My friend butchers the deer for me. I can walk to two different lakes and one stream and pull fish out all day. I go to my Amish neighbors, point at a chicken and 15 min later its ready for me to take home and cook. As for the rest of my meat I get most of it from the farmer's market. At least 90% of my diet is obtained locally, including my vegetables. I don't have any problem whatsoever with vegetarians/vegans or whatever else is out there but fuck off if you want to push your lifestyle on me. From an environmental standpoint I have a smaller footprint than most vegetarians or vegans and I eat meat almost every day.

Why not publish an article about the environmental benefits of harvesting local game or eating locally grown food without the vegetarian dogma? You guys are almost as bad as the Jesus pushers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: More crap from Alternet Posted by: Frank J.
» Forget It. They Never Will. Posted by: grumble-bum
Going vegetarian is a win-win-win move
Posted by: Lucy P on Nov 30, 2007 6:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article, Kathy! Eating delicious vegetarian foods instead of artery-clogging meat, eggs, and dairy products is a win-win-win decision. It makes a world of difference for our planet, our health, and of course, animals. I went vegetarian more than 16 years ago, and it is one of the best choices I've ever made. I encourage everyone to give it a try--like Kathy says, it can be as simple as ordering a veggie burger instead of the kind made from cows. Your body, the earth, and animals will thank you! Check out VegCooking.com to for tasty, animal-free recipes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Vegetarian Oligarchy Posted by: benzene
Typical veggie burgers are terribly destructive towards the environment
Posted by: daniel347x on Nov 30, 2007 6:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, one of the simplest and most elemental things you can do to decrease your carbon footprint is to choose a veggie burger over a hamburger.

It saddens me to read this unenlightened comment in the context of an otherwise enlightened article, and reminds me of the long section of veggie burgers for sale at Whole Foods supermarket, a large chain that specializes in making people feel guilt-free about their food choices, while having tragically minimal impact on the actual environment.

The industrial growing of soybeans is more water- and fertilizer- intensive, soil-depleting, pesticide-driven and destructive of the environment, including C02 emissions, than any of the other major industrialized food crops. Industrialized agriculture of our staple food crops, even those not used for the raising of cattle, rank as one of the most destructive single practices for the environment and for C02 emissions on the planet.

This is common knowledge amongst those who follow environmental issues and this fact ought to be at the tip of anyone's fingers who would write an article such as the one above.

To suggest that we replace one environmentally destructive eating habit, industrialized meat, with another, industrialized soy, is folly. There's a well-known statistic that land used to feed one person meat could feed something like 17 people a vegetarian diet. I think a similar statistic could be used to describe industrialized soy production, though I doubt it's as extreme as meat (I don't know the statistic). Eating soy burgers is probably less destructive for the environment than eating meat, but I suspect not so significantly to be worth suggesting as the solution for the problem.

Industrialized soy production needs to be stopped, and replaced with small-scale biodiverse farming practices, if we want to solve our current crises.

Incidentally, I agree with a previous post, that if meat were raised with environmentally conscious practices, it could also be done sustainably. Similarly for soy.

Dan Nissenbaum

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dubious article from a dubious person
Posted by: zooeyhall on Nov 30, 2007 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't this the same Kathy Freston who claimed awhile back on Alternet that you couldn't be a Progressive if you ate meat? And isn't she an ex-model who wrote some cockamamie book about "overcoming her insecurities" and is married to some millionaire media mogul?

Listen, Alternet---I know you need contributions and this babe has probably contributed plenty. But don't lower your creditability by giving a forum to some half-assed poor little rich girl Lexus Liberal to promote her near-religious views on vegetarianism.

BTW--I am a farmer and progressive and livestock producer who is going to have steak tonight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: