Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Promoting the Common Good: There's Only One Reason to Grant a Corporate Charter

By David Korten, YES! Magazine. Posted November 26, 2007.


It's time we step back and consider the concept of the private-benefit corporation.
Advertisement

The following was an address to the Summit on the Future of the Corporation, held in Boston on November 13-14.

It is fitting that we hold this conversation on the future of the corporation in historic Faneuil Hall, the Cradle of Liberty. Deliberations in this very room more than 200 years ago were the first step on a long walk away from a king named George that launched a new nation and led ultimately to the end of monarchy. May the success of our forbears inspire us in our deliberations on the future of the private-benefit corporation.

The Big Picture

I recall my business school professors many years ago calling us to look at the big picture to identify the systemic cause of whatever immediate problem symptom captured our attention. We would do well to apply this wisdom as we look ahead to the role of the private-benefit corporation in a profoundly troubled 21st century. We must identify the deep systemic causes of the social and environmental crises unfolding all around us--no matter how troubling the resulting conclusions may be. Here is the big picture in brief outline.

1. Consumption: Growth in human consumption resulting from a combination of population growth and growth in consumption per capita is depleting the natural life support system of the planet, disrupting hydrology and climate systems, and threatening human survival.

2. Inequality: Unconscionable and growing concentration of financial power in a world engaged in an ever more intense competition for a declining base of material wealth is eroding the social fabric to the point of widespread social breakdown.

3. Institutional Pathology: The most powerful institutions on the planet, global financial markets and the transnational corporations that serve them, are dedicated to growing consumption and inequality. They convert real capital into financial capital to increase the relative economic power of those who live by money, while depressing the wages of those who produce real value through their labor. They offer palliatives that leave the deeper cause of our potentially terminal environmental and social crises untouched, because they are the cause.

Our future depends on a dramatic cultural and institutional transformation to reduce aggregate consumption and achieve an equitable distribution of economic power.It requires an epic institutional transformation to:

1. Reduce aggregate human consumption.

2. Redistribute financial power from rich to poor to achieve an equitable distribution of Earth's life-sustaining wealth.

3. Increase economic efficiency by reallocating material resources from harmful to beneficial uses. Examples include reallocation from military to health care and environmental rejuvenation, from automobiles to public transportation, from suburban sprawl to compact communities, from conversion to reclamation of forest and agricultural land, from advertising to education, and from global financial speculation to investment in self-reliant local economies.

4. Invest in the regeneration of the living human, social, and natural capital that is the foundation of all real wealth. This requires reversing the current process of converting the real wealth of living capital into the fictitious wealth of financial capital and accepting the resulting negative returns to financial capital. It may take us awhile to recognize that just as increasing financial capital at the expense of living capital makes us collectively poorer, increasing living capital at the expense of financial capital makes us collectively richer.

5. Accelerate social innovation, adaptation, and learning by nurturing cultural diversity and removing intellectual property rights impediments to the free and open flow of beneficial knowledge.

These are imperatives of the 21st century and it is difficult to identify a constructive role in addressing them for the private-benefit corporation--a term for any corporation chartered solely to serve the narrow and exclusive private financial interests of its investors and top managers.

The Private-Benefit Corporation

The private-benefit corporation is an institution granted a legally protected right--some would claim obligation--to pursue a narrow private interest without regard to broader social and environmental consequences. If it were a real person, it would fit the clinical profile of a sociopath.

The basic design of the private-benefit corporation was created in 1600 when the British crown chartered the British East India Company as what is best described as a legalized criminal syndicate to colonize the resources and economies of distant lands to benefit wealthy investors far removed from the social and environmental consequences. That design has ever since proven highly effective in advancing the private interests of the world's wealthiest people at enormous cost to the rest.

The private-benefit corporation uses its economic power to privatize (internalize) gains and socialize (externalize) cost. The resulting concentration of wealth creates an illusion that wealth is being created, when the actual consequence is a net destruction of real wealth It is an institutional form best suited to achieving outcomes exactly the opposite of those we humans must now pursue.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: workplace, coporate accountability

David Korten is a former economist with USAID, author of "When Corporations Rule the World," and an associate of the International Forum on Globalization.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
There may be an Absolute increase in consumption but a relative decrease. This is due to low demand
Posted by: yellow on Nov 26, 2007 2:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the key developments about US late capitalism is that is increasingly breaking with its post WWII pattern of being an essentially consumer driven economy mainly through consumer durables and new residential housing. By 1960, 62% of Americans owned their own homes, a one third increase over the previous 20 years. Though experts believe that personal consumption currently drives 70% of the US economy, about 68% of the GDP consists of financial and other services. One huge impact of financialization on US consumers, whose real incomes have stagnated over the past forty years, is the accumulation of over $8,100 per capita in consumer debt (excluding mortgages but including non-revolving debt like auto loans)and well over $1.5 trillion in non-mortgage consumer debt nationwide. Debt driven growth is related to the stagnation of real middle class income growth that drove the immediate post WWII expansion.

The US economy, which has been growing at under 3% annually for the last seven years, is increasingly financially and service driven. Personal consumption remains quite high but is less a factor in US economic expansion than is finance and business related services. The American consumer is actually being marginalized compared to the role played by personal consumption in the heyday of consumption based growth during the first three decades immediately following the end of WWII.

This shift is disturbing and explains the current epoch of chronic stagnation and its companion development, financialization. The maldistribution of wealth and the dampening of effective consumer demand coexists with massive upward trends over time in global stock market growth. This reflects a decrease in the importance of mass consumption to GDP growth and an increase in financialization, mergers and acquisitions, corporate services and the military in driving the US and global economies.

Despite massive and growing real consumer debt and a recent pump up of liquidity by the FED of $41 billion to resolve the mortgage crisis (this increase in banking reserves represents only 3% of M1)consumption itself is proving less vital to the growth of the US economy. We are moving toward an increasingly globalized basis for the US economy and the internal picture is becoming less politically and in other ways significant for the US elite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporations are Quasi-Governments, NOT persons
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Nov 26, 2007 11:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Download from:
http://www.marklynas.org/2007/
4/23/six-steps-to-hell-summary-
of-six-degrees-as-published-in
-the-guardian

By the end of the THIS century, we humans go EXTINCT if we
don't mend our carbon burning ways. The article is too long to
reprint in an AlterNet comment.

Nuclear power needs subsidies ONLY because of paranoid people
who will protest. Nuclear power is the safest kind.

Corporations are QUASI-GOVERNMENTS, not persons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]