Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

11 Solutions to Halting the Environmental Crisis

By Yifat Susskind, AlterNet. Posted October 31, 2007.


Here are 11 solutions already being put into practice by innovative communities around the world.
Advertisement

You probably don't need to be told that the threat of climate change is real. If you're concerned about the issue, it's fairly easy to conjure the apocalyptic scenes of widespread drought, frequent deadly storms, mass hunger, and wars over natural resources like oil and water. Much harder to come by are examples of positive actions that can avert these disasters and ease the crisis in places where they are already in play. So let's skip the litany of catastrophes that await if global warming is not controlled. Instead, why not focus on some solutions? None are perfect or complete, but each offers a model of positive change that is more than theoretically possible -- it is already happening.

Many of these examples are small-scale and local. That's instructive because our best hope for sustainability -- in agriculture, industry, energy, community design, and government -- may lie in local, small-scale models like some of those presented here. It may seem as though large-scale problems require large-scale solutions. But most big institutions and processes are driven by the very people and ideas that have generated our global crisis. It's in the local and the small that the majority of people can exercise agency and decision-making power.

While we may not be looking to create large-scale models of every success story, we do need to replicate, adapt, and institutionalize what works for people, communities, and the environment. We need to link local initiatives and build on them by enacting policies that can sustain their momentum.

To overcome our global environmental crisis, we need solutions that are at once visionary and concrete. Here are some of the many innovations that are ours to develop.

1. What if women -- the majority of the world's farmers -- could resist the commercialization of agriculture and strengthen food-centered economies?

When the World Bank forced Kenyan farmers to start growing tea for export instead of food, Kenyan women took the lead in resisting those policies. Through their Green Belt Movement, the women planted over 40 million trees to offset deforestation caused by tea plantations and created initiatives to promote sustainable farming. Today, the Green Belt Movement includes hundreds of thousands of rural people across Africa.

2. What if poor rural families were given land so that they could grow their own food?

Through mass civil disobedience and political organizing, the Landless Workers' Movement (MST) in Brazil succeeded in overturning government policy and securing 15 million acres of farmland for 250,000 families. The families' average income is now four times the minimum wage. Infant mortality is half the national average and many MST settlements are models of sustainable agriculture.

3. What if Indigenous Peoples' collective rights were recognized, ending the attack on those who have managed and maintained the world's most delicate ecosystems for millennia?

This year saw a major step in this direction with the passage of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The Declaration recognizes Indigenous Peoples' right to control their territories and resources, which hold much of the Earth's remaining biodiversity and half its untapped fossil fuels. Now, Indigenous women are working to ensure that governments honor the Declaration.

4. What if economic policies recognized that preserving the environment was more important than obtaining fossil fuels?

Ecuador's President Correa has announced that he will not drill for oil in Yasuni National Park. The decision marks the first time an oil-producing country has formally chosen to forgo oil exploration and shift its economy from oil dependency to more sustainable alternatives that protect ecosystems and Indigenous rights while averting more global carbon emissions.

5. What if governments valued people's happiness over economic growth?

The government of Bhutan has replaced the singular, narrow standard of Gross Domestic Product with a measure it calls Gross National Happiness. Bhutan is not a utopia, but it has made remarkable progress in building its economy while preserving the environment, limiting corruption, and supporting education and healthcare. Life expectancy in Bhutan has risen by 19 years since the "happiness index" was established in 1972.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: environment, water, women, climate change, global warming

Yifat Susskind is communications director of MADRE, an international women's human rights organization.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
One more
Posted by: masumane on Oct 31, 2007 4:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
12. What if we could stop population growth?

Population growth (even in the rich countries) continues. The more people, the harder it is to produce enough food. There is no non-industrial farming methods for growing enough food for the projected 9-10 billion humans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One more Posted by: richholland
» RE: None from this one Posted by: boydranchitos
» RE: One more Posted by: Daniel35
Another one
Posted by: zukiblue on Oct 31, 2007 5:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
13. What if we understood how we came to be at this point of environmental catastrophe? All should become familiar with the Tragedy of the Commons, a concept inherent in this Aristotle quote "that which is common to the greatest number has the least care bestowed upon it."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On the Bright Side
Posted by: cba11 on Oct 31, 2007 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I sincerely appreciate reading about what is happening proactively globally on this topic. Thank you.
Chris Aven

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No mention of Oslo...
Posted by: Phenix on Oct 31, 2007 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before I even read the 'author' of this report I figured it would focus on the global south. The global south is not responsbile for the coming global warming crisis and focusing on the global south in ~9 examples is a clear bias.

The authors also applaud left wing administrations that are planning to exploit the Amazon with massive highway projects. The new regional model that is meant to combat US imperialism is still in its infancy and very little of what I've seen indicates that they will be more environmental friendly.

The exclusion of Curitiba and Oslo are also noteworthy. I am farily certain that the latter became one of the greenest cities in the world even though it had to reclaim much of the industrial pollution left by its shipping industry. Now Curitiba is a model for many urban environmentalists or at least the few I know. It is a major success story and should be held up whenever possible.

7 out of 10 for this article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

INCONSISTENT BULLSHIT !
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 31, 2007 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First off, the author acts like another nutcase playing the go-along-get-along game of allowing BIG OIL/COAL/NUCLEAR to pit the economy and the environment against each other. Second, I just hate authors who make this another man vs woman issue and these authors should be SHOT !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: BIG OIL/COAL/NUCLEAR Posted by: AsteroidMiner
Lancaster PA
Posted by: Axiom69 on Oct 31, 2007 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Amish way of life is looking better and better. Talk about a "green" culture. Their "carbon footprint" as an entire community is probably smaller than the average US household. I wonder if hybrid drivers still have that feeling of moral superiority when they pass a horse and buggy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lancaster PA Posted by: sausage
» RE: Lancaster PA Posted by: Axiom69
» RE: Lancaster PA Posted by: AsteroidMiner
What if we would simply grow more Hemp?
Posted by: garry minor on Oct 31, 2007 10:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cannabis industrialization will change our world!
All paper, plastics, packaging, paints, varnishes, textiles, insulations, rope, netting, pressed board products, structural components, lubricants, fuels, many medicines, and much more can be made with cannabis/hemp! In 1938 Popular Mechanics wrote that there were over 25,000 products that could be made with it, and that with the earlier invention of the decorticator, would be the first billion dollar crop. Too bad a year earlier in 1937 the first drug czar Harry Anslinger, the Dupont, Hearst, and other Corporations had successfully demonized it and made it illegal to grow. The most useful plant on the planet illegal!!!
Henry Ford built and fueled a car primarily with hemp. The cellulose plastic panels ten times stronger than steel. Synthetic plastics were developed using cellulose technology. Cellulose plastics are safe and can be used and then ground up as fertilizer. Neither Ford or Diesel intended to run their engines with dirty petroleum. Ford envisioned making alcohol out of everything possible, Diesel ran an engine on peanut oil. What happened?
One acre of hemp equals four of timber for pulp and you harvest it every year, in some area's twice. Tree's take a lifetime. Hemp is ten times more efficient than corn for ethanol production. It grows from the Equator to the Arctic circle in soil and conditions many crops won't grow. It also requires no fertilizers, herbicides, or pesticides to foul the soil and water. It's roots grow deep breaking up the soil for next years crop. Canvas is Dutch for cannabis. For thousands of years all ships sails and most clothing were made of kaneh fiber which is the longest and strongest in nature. It was legal to pay taxes with it in Colonial America. The War of 1812 was fought over it. The early Pioneer's wagons were covered with hemp fabric. It certainly wasn't veiwed as something evil. It has a wonderful history. People have written books!
The cannabis seed is the single most nutritious thing you can eat. Our Government actually stockpiles it as a stategic food source under Executive order #12919. Not only is it great for us just as it is, but it could replace the supposed need for hormones and remnants in feedstock which is why American beef is banned in Europe. These additives are believed to be the reason for the spread of BSE's in our food chain which are believed to cause plaque buildups and mental detioration in some people. Birds love hemp seed and will actually pick them out first.
You and I have cannabinoid receptors in our body. All Mammals, birds, and reptiles do. Cannabis works with these receptors independent of those that govern the heart and breathing which is why cannabis CANNOT kill you! In fact it is good for you. New actually reliable studies done in Europe and Canada have proven that cannabis promotes the growth of brain cells and destroys tumors. It has been found very helpful with Alzheimers, MS, epilepsy, depression, diabetes, autism, migraine, arthritis, obesity, chronic pain, nausea, glaucoma, drug addiction, alcoholism, asthma, emphysema, herpes, Parkinsons, Huntingtons, Tourettes, Crohns disease and more. The only side effects are that it makes you actually feel good and hungry! Hungry is healthy!! It is a physical and spiritual health food!
Cannabis industrialization will change the way we all live and create millions of Earth friendly jobs from agriculture to science.
It will change the way we think and open our minds and resources to a better way of life for ourselves and generations to come.

Kaneh bosm!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the only solution
Posted by: dbaker on Oct 31, 2007 11:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
human excrement + nuclear waste = hydrogen

the ONLY potential replacement technology for the fossil fuel powered electrical generating facilities that are the primary source of carbon emissions

Dennis Baker

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When the collapse comes, the global south will be the place to be
Posted by: sausage on Oct 31, 2007 1:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's face facts. When environmental degradation and wealth distribution maladjustment combine to bring the inevitable collapse of Western civilization, the so-called Thrid World nations of the "global south" will be the place to be.

Look, I live in the heart of of most industrialized state in the union, dedicated to agriculture. Agriculture is big industry. It's a major polluter and has forever altered the landscape of my home state. Moreover, with industrialized farming techniques there does not need to be all that many farmers on the land. In fact some so-called farmers don't even sit in a tractor or even own their land. They rent property as needed and hire out the work of plowing and harvesting to "custom farming" contractors. The majority of childern in this country couldn't even tell you where the food on their family's table come from or how it gets there!

So, if the United States ever has a French or Russian-style revolution or suffers a natural catastrophe which causes major disruptions in industry, transportation, communications and, especially, agriculture we're just fucked. The fact is we smart Americans won't be able to feed our selves.

So that's why I'm saying that the Third World has a better chance of surviving an American collapse. As long as Third World farmers retain some indigenous strains of food crops, and not succumb to the Siren-song of the hybrid seed salesman, they'll at least have something to eat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What if
Posted by: Jeff Hoffman on Oct 31, 2007 1:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ALL people limited their families to one child and simplified their lifestyles to live in some degree of harmony with nature? That's really all that's needed; everything else is superfluous and/or irrelevant. Of course, most people don't want to take these necessary steps, so we just keep getting false solutions like new technologies (such as biodiesel, which when made from plants is more ecologically harmful than petroleum due to the destruction of natural ecosystems, such as rainforests, that are being destroyed to make it) or changed political schemes (such as empowering women or the poor, which are laudable ideas but which will do little or nothing to solve our major ecological crises) instead of dealing with the roots of the problems, which is the only thing that will be effective.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» limits? no one wants to hear that .. Posted by: stilldreaming
Tell me more about participatory democracy
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Oct 31, 2007 8:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tell me more about participatory democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gross National Happiness? How cool is that?
Posted by: jparsons on Oct 31, 2007 11:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can you imagine in your wildest dreams BushCheney caring,
much less measuring, how happy the the people in "their"
country are?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about Indigenous peoples?
Posted by: Flashgordon123 on Nov 1, 2007 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about the impacts all of this is having on indigenous peoples? Especially some of the new "alternative" fuels such as biodiesel? There are a bunch of articles on the Indigenous Issues Today news blog that cover the impacts of biofuel on indigenous people. Not good!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Global Warming Narrative - Getting It Right
Posted by: Urgelt on Nov 1, 2007 12:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's time to change the global warming narrative. Here's why.

Climatological records compiled by Woods Hole show pretty clearly that from 1880 until today, atmospheric CO2 shot up from 280 ppm to over 350 ppm.

To put that into perspective: 280 ppm was, in 1880, the highest atmospheric CO2 reading in 420,000 years, which is as far as we've been able to obtain reliable data from Antarctic ice cores.

No-where in the geological record in the past 420,000 years has CO2 been this high. What's more, the rise in atmospheric C02 did not lag 800 years behind a warming trend. It led it. This is without precedent in the geological record.

In other words, by 1880, human activity had already begun to drive Earth's climate off the rails.

In 1880, there were about 1.2 billion people, and relatively few of them were industrialized. In 2007, there are around 6.8 billion, and more than half of them are industrialized. Both population and industrialization are rising.

In this context, how could we get to pre-1880 levels of energy consumption? Through land reform? Democritization? Conservation? Don't be foolish. Those sorts of things are worth doing for other reasons, but they are not solutions to global climate change brought on by humans.

Our choices are far more stark than those presented in the article. They are: 1) Drastic depopulation and return to pre-industrial modes. 2) A technological shift away from deriving energy from burning fuels.

Not being a fan of depopulation or pre-industrial lifestyles due to the massive, unconscionable suffering they would impose, I conclude that only a massive technological shift in our energy economy is capable of ending human influence on climate.

The news on that front is fairly good. A number of alternative energy technologies exist and are being developed. What environmentalists need to do is get behind these technologies and push them, politically and economically: electric vehicles, solar, wind, ocean kinetic and thermal, geothermal, nuclear.

Yakking about land reform, wealth equity justice, democritization, and other liberal pet causes only muddies the issue and generates opposition from the right wing. It does far more harm than good to hitch every liberal cart to the Global Warming horse. Global warming is something that should unite us across the political spectrum - and it will, if we address the issue in the only terms that can solve it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thank you, Urgelt Posted by: AsteroidMiner
Roxsen
Posted by: Roxsen on Nov 2, 2007 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the U.S and Canada, many are turning "what if" into "let's do it" by taking up SPIN-Farming. SPIN is a non-technical, easy-to-learn and inexpensive-to-implement farming system that makes it possible to earn significant income from sub-acre land bases, and it is giving rise to a new class of citizen-farmers who are taking up farming in their backyards and front lawns.
There is no one profile of a SPIN farmer. Some are doing it part-time, others full-time. Some are young and just starting out, while others are older and on their third or fourth careers. Some have more money than they know what to do with, and others have less than they need. Some are convinced the world is doomed while others are trying to save it. SPIN spans geography, generations, class and ideologies, and is providing a practical tool to make farming as a profession accessible to many more people. And it is helping to spark a farming revival that provides common ground, quite literally, beneath everyone’s feet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Small farming=social change Posted by: pawprints
What if..?
Posted by: clitton on Nov 3, 2007 12:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Somebody actually suggested workable solutions? I mean, instead of saying "wouldn't it be nice if women mobilized the global food-producing economy?", why not make some actual suggestions for how this might happen? Instead of making general suggestions for things "people" could do, why not say who could do what, if you have some ideas?

The global leftist community suffers from a lack of real, specific suggestions for how to solve all the crises it likes to talk about. I'm dying for some real viable suggestions so I can actually make a difference!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]