Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

The Climate Movement We Have Been Waiting For

By Courtney Hull, AlterNet. Posted October 27, 2007.


Young people are leading the way and they need the rest of us to join them.
Advertisement

When environmentalist author Bill McKibben spoke to a community of progressive philanthropists this past summer, he advised his audience, "We do not have time to wait for change light bulb by light bulb, person by person, or even community by community. We need a movement, and we need it right now." I then raised my hand, and asked him where he saw the most promising seeds of such a movement to lie, if at all. His first response, "The youth movement." Looking directly at me, perhaps one of the youngest people in the room, he said, "You probably know them. Energy Action Coalition."

He was right. I do know the Energy Action Coalition, and as a young person in North America, it is becoming increasingly difficult to not cross paths with Energy Action. A coalition of more than forty youth led social justice and environmental organizations, Energy Action is pulling young people together from across the U.S. and Canada to fight for and win clean energy and climate policies. In May 2005, Energy Action launched the Campus Climate Challenge to unite students in gaining 100 percent clean energy policies on their campuses. In the first year of the Challenge, more than 550 universities, tribal colleges, high schools, and community colleges signed on. These young activists and organizers are now well on their way to reaching a 3-year goal of 1000 campuses moving towards 100 percent carbon neutrality.

McKibben continued that day, back in July, saying that, "When it comes to talking versus doing, young people are getting the most done." Shortly thereafter, and almost as if to not disappoint McKibben, who has been a leader and inspirational visionary within the environmental movement for decades, Energy Action announced that it was once again upping the ante. This time in the form of Powershift, the first national youth led-climate summit, which will take place Nov. 2-5th in Washington D.C.

This historic gathering will bring youth of all backgrounds, from all 50 states, and every single Congressional district, together for four days of training, action, and inspiration. We will use our experience from local and state level climate change movements to create a fresh, positive, and hopeful vision of the future; one focused on our potential to overcome the challenges of the 21st century, build a clean energy economy, achieve energy independence, create millions of green jobs, increase global equity, and revitalize the American economy. Indeed these are ambitious goals, but as young people who will be left to deal with the consequences of global warming, we can ask no less.

As a young person myself, I have heard my elders say over and over, "Where are the young people? ... Why aren't they voting? ... Back in the 1960's, young people led the way ... Do young people today just not care?" We as a country have been waiting for our youth to get organized, inspire us, and lead the way toward positive social change. Well, the young people we have been waiting for are here; they are mobilized and they are showing up.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: environment, climate change, global warming, bill mckibben, power shift

Courtney Hull is the Political Director for Green for All, a national organization working to build a green economy strong enough to lift people out of poverty.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Who are the Real Leaders on Climate Change?
Posted by: matti on Oct 27, 2007 2:03 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The carbon-polluters.

Duh,


Obviously,


Oh wait they mean on the ISSUE of Climate Change?

I get it now,

That's why I should read the article before posting.


-matti

P.S. I just realized even my lame joke was off.

'Cause GOD is totally responsible for all this NATURAL climate change right?

Or is it Jesus? Or are they the same? I get confused.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LOL Posted by: gellero
synalia
Posted by: synalia on Oct 27, 2007 6:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Encouraging, Courtney! I want to join the event November 2-5, but am on travel. But, I will follow up.

I have been planting trees. It saved tremendously on the cooling costs this past summer. It seems people are not replanting as the trees die off. The increase in large storms may be a reason. I am also trying to garden with only people-power and no pesticides. A lot of work! More to do.

Thanks for an inspiration and hope, and a call to action.

Best wishes,
Kayce Cover, http://synalia.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Al Gore is a blowhard Posted by: pammers
Man-made Catastrophic Global Warming Not True
Posted by: DrColes on Oct 27, 2007 7:12 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
UK court says Gore is a fraud. August 2007 Update: Man-made Catastrophic Global Warming Not True. Hansen unfortunately is a political hack of George Soros. Further, flawed NASA Global Warming data paid for by George Soros. In order to be an intelligent reader you must have a basic knowledge. Please do your own homework; a starting point http://www.InteliOrg.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» DUMB & DUMBER Posted by: gellero
» Dumbest Posted by: particle
» Grossly misleading Posted by: themotie
Energy Neutrality
Posted by: Urgelt on Oct 27, 2007 7:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Courtney, "energy neutrality" is a term popularized by Al Gore.

Al Gore has done some good by popularizing the global warming problem. And I'm glad that young people are taking an interest in this problem. It's encouraging.

But there's a problem with this term, "energy neutrality." And that problem is carbon credits trading. It's a pure scam.

I'll explain a bit, but you really should look for yourself at what, exactly, is happening with carbon credits trading.

This example is real, by the way. A wind farmer in Alaska built some windmills. Pretty soon a corporate weasel showed up and offered him some money to buy a piece of paper from him - his carbon credits. The money offered was a tiny fraction of the cost of the windmills - but hey, it was a windfall. He signed.

Now the weasel had a piece of paper. He sold it to a CO2 emitter - perhaps a college campus (the report I read wasn't sure where those particular credits were sold). Now the CO2 emitter has a piece of paper that says his CO2 emissions are "offset" by green energy.

What's wrong with this picture?

The money paid by the CO2 emitter didn't buy any green energy. The windmills were already built and operating, and the energy from them was going elsewhere. And the CO2 emitter is still emitting.

Carbon credits are being sold as cover-your-ass documents and have no real effect on CO2 emissions.

The same scam operates in the timber industry. Land owned by timber companies is routinely planted and harvested. They're selling carbon credits now for the trees they plant. Net effect on atmospheric CO2 - nada. Yet the paper goes to a CO2 emitter and covers his ass.

What about rainfall preservation? The credits for a hunk of rain forest are sold to cover a CO2 emitter somewhere else. But is any new rain forest added? No. The paper does not represent a change in the balance of CO2 emissions and CO2 sinks.

In fact it's a well-known problem in Brazil and elsewhere that, despite existing laws, illegal loggers are razing vast tracts of those same forests. NASA tracks the destruction. The only way to "preserve" those rain forests is to patrol them with armed guards. And that isn't something the carbon credits traders are interested in.

In Great Britain, a criminal investigation is underway into carbon credits trading. Already it's apparent that laws governing financial trading are not sufficient to ensure that credits represent real changes to atmospheric CO2. In the US there are no laws at all which ensure that they do.

When someone tells you a lot of campuses are "CO2-neutral" now, look deeper. Covering your ass is not the same as making real changes in emissions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Paper trading is no solution Posted by: nightgaunt
The Time for a Climate Change Movement is Now
Posted by: bquinto on Oct 27, 2007 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Young people have throughout time been at the wheel of social change, driving cultural shifts and political change when things can no longer be ignored -- Why? Because we have nothing to lose.. no agenda that is compromised or which weighs necessary changes against profit loss. Plain and simply: it is our future we're talking about. Billy Parish's work, and that of the Energy Action Coalition, have once again proven that there is no better a population to mobilize than his peers. Youth movements remain the engines of social change.

Urgelt's comment about carbon credits is spot on. If we are dumping toxic waste into the land, but giving money to someone who is planting trees, it will not make the waste any less toxic or harmful, nor will such a gesture save the planet. The fallacy of carbon credits -- or a carbon tax -- is that emissions are permissible, even while scientific data confirming its catastrophic impact can no longer be doubted, if we can afford it. Our capitalist system, often devoid of social benefit in its purpose, believes that solutions can be bought, when the truth is that for change to occur, those actions that are damaging *must be stopped,* period, not offset. To call these changes unrealistic is an assault on decency, integrity, and the true nature of humanity to adapt to its environment. What we have left of it, at least.

PowerShift is a critical moment in the youth climate movement, and this movement has already taken root in the US (through Energy Action Coalition, SustainUS and similar initiatives), in Canada and Australia through Youth Climate Coalitions, in the U.K., and is gaining momentum in other countries now, too. Young people have been the loudest voices of criticism at the last three United Nations Climate Change Conferences, at the World Summit for Sustainable Development and, after PowerShift, many are headed to the next UN Climate Conference (COP13) in Bali, in December.

There could be no better time to connect the movement, align our forces, and unite in our demand for a reduction of emissions, policies that ensure more sustainable development, and which *hold to account* those corporations and governments that are not safeguarding the environment. There is no room for negotiation, only action. The time for a cohesive climate change movement is now, and those best poised to lead it, as the writer states so beautifully in this article, are doing so already. Adults are invited to not just change the lightbulbs in their house, but discover ways in which they can support the young leaders of this movement. Have you considered helping to send young people to PowerShift, and to Bali, or making a contribution to the cause they are championing? Young people can lead, but they cannot do it alone.. There are still "elders" who remember the idealism of their youth, and today’s leaders need the help of yesteryears if they are to stand up to the powerful interests preventing the necessary change from occurring.

- benjamin quinto
global youth action network

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Most young people know jack about conservation
Posted by: Bobsays on Oct 27, 2007 9:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's be honest: go outside and see how environmentally-aware most of the youth you meet are. The majority (apart from the smart-asses they find to run 'youth groups') do not live 'green' lives. Their great grand parents did, that I agree. But today's youth?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interesting quote - as usual, it's all about the money.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 27, 2007 12:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"As a young person myself, I have heard my elders say over and over, "Where are the young people? ... Why aren't they voting? ... Back in the 1960's, young people led the way ... Do young people today just not care?"

Well, let's just take another look at that tired old claim.

First, let's run down the global market value of the fossil fuel industry:

The major integrated oil and gas (Exxon, Total, etc.) have a net market value of $1.8 trillion dollars. That's just the majors - if you add up all the independent oil and gas businesses, according to yahoo finance, that's an additional $13 trillion in market value. Oil and gas services (pipelines, marketing, etc.) add on an addition $1.5 trillion in market value.

Electric utilites (read: coal-fired power plants) sum up to a paltry $385 billion, and gas utilities come in at $122 billion. Diversified utilites contribute another $190 billion. Only a tiny fraction of electrical generation is represented by renewables.

So, add all that up - and you have a a very large number, about $17 trillion dollars of market value that relies entirely on being able to continue pumping or digging fossil fuels out of the ground, burning them, and releasing the wastes into the atmosphere as CO2.

Now, let's talk about the baby boomer's pension funds, which are all, surprise surprise, heavily invested in fossil fuels (that's the biggest sector of the economy, outside of the paper money sector, which is itself leveraged off of fossil fuels - i.e. the funds).

To rebuild the global energy infrastructure with renewables will take a similar level of investment. A solar cell manufacturing plant costs say, $100-$200 million. How many such factories would be needed to supply a large fraction of power demand? They'd need supporting facilities as well. The number is in the thousands, certainly.

Consider if instead of spending $1 trillion in Iraq to kill and slaughter people and capture oilfields, we'd have invested that sum in renewable infrastructure. That's enough for 5,000 to 10,000 solar cell or wind turbine factories.

Now, US electricity demand was 789,475 megawatts (MW) in 2006 (summer peak). Winter peak demand, which is always smaller than summer peak demand, was 640,981 MW.

A solar cell factory can maybe turn out 50 MW per year of solar panels. If you have 10,000 solar cell factories, in 10 years you can produce 500,000 MW of solar cell panels.

Not bad, not bad. You can set up bank loan programs so that homeowners can purchase solar setups for affordable down payments, say 10-20% down on systems that cost anywhere from $10-$100,000, depending on size.

Now, let's say we also use fuel efficient transportation that results in a 50% increase in fuel efficiency, and start using biofuels to meet that demand (after getting fossil fuels out of agriculture)? It's entirely possible.

But if we do that, what happens to the pension funds? What happens to the lucrative payouts to the electric utilities? What does a 50% reduction in sales mean for the oil&gas industry? What happens to the cushy retirement packages that the baby boomers have all engineered? The money has to be reinvested in infrastruture, not in second homes, European vacations, and luxury yachts.

The greedy old bastards don't want to see their retirement incomes decrease, do they? What's truly pathetic about the "older generation's indignation" is that THEY HAD THE CHANCE TO DO THIS IN THE LATE 1970s! Instead of biting the bullet, they sold out to Wall Street and the Reaganite greedheads and their Saudi buddies - and here we are.

But, unlike the boomers, we aren't going to sell out our future for cocaine, plastic surgery, and fast cars.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's all in how you do it. Posted by: thoughtcriminal
Action to preserve the Earth will entitle this generation to the "Power Generation."
Posted by: Sojourner on Oct 27, 2007 1:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As always. Show me a political system that protects and preserves the Earth, and I will sign on the dotted line. Unfortunately, none can satisfy that requirement, so I am a homeless, stateless idealist abandoned to the disappearing jungle.

World leaders compete on who can burn up the Earth's resources faster. It seems that if you ain't destroying something, you gotta be a wimp. A pox on all your houses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thinly Veiled Control Scheme
Posted by: nonein2008 on Oct 27, 2007 3:51 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't you see that global warming is just another thinly veiled control scheme by the machine. It is a typical terror tactic of the politicians to say "turn over your freedoms, we will protect you or we'll save you". "If you don't the sky will fall". It is exactly the same machine that says turn over your freedoms and we'll protect you from the terrorists. We'll make the world safe.

This is ages old scheme, if we don't make the human sacrifice, the gods will destroy our crops, planet, kids, etc. Trust we the elders to make the choices to save your world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

EnvDefense, NRDC and Western Resource Advocates push coal gasification and CO2 sequestration fantasy
Posted by: nanboski on Oct 27, 2007 8:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am still stumped why really good scientists like the folks at NRDC and EDF would push coal gasification and carbon sequestration. It's a fantasy we don't have time or money to indulge in. 5 IGCC plants in the U.S. have been withdrawn, and 4 are on hold. And it's NOT because the big green groups are fighting them - it's the small fry like www.mncoalgasplant.com and www.energyjustice.net and www.cmnow.org and www.greendel.org. In the ENTIRE world, only 3 million tons/yr of CO2 is being sequestered in 3 locations (Weyburn Canada, under the North Sea by Statoil in Norway, and Al Salah in Algeria). EACH location is sequestering ONE million tons -- big deal! That's a pittance considering that a single coal plant emits 5-10 million tons CO2/year. Right now the feds are doing demonstration projects and storing 1,000-20,000 tons -- this is NOT a solution. Induced seismic activity has resulted from other liquid injection projects. In the 1960's, the U.S. Army Corps injected 165 million gals of liquid waste from Rocky Mtn Arsenal under the Denver basin, inducing 1,500 seismic events btwn 1962 and 67 -- three over Richter magnitude 5.

Come on, big green! I've heard that NRDC and ED combined budget is $120 million. Can't you be leaders? Time is wasting, CO2 is building, coal plants are being permitted...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

heroes of global warming
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Oct 27, 2007 10:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The innumerate humanitologists are, as usual, full of nonsense.
The real heroes are the physicists who discovered and measured
global warming, who measured the optical properties of carbon
dioxide a century ago, etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To be perfectly clear
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Oct 27, 2007 11:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Courtney Hull & Bill McKibben: The students are the foot
soldiers. The leaders are the professors and other researchers
who have had their post doctoral degrees for some time. The
scientists who wrote the IPCC reports, for example. The
scientists who create RealClimate. The ice core drillers. The
paleontologist Dr. Kump. There are too many to mention.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terra Preta Soils Technology To Master the Carbon Cycle
Posted by: erich on Oct 28, 2007 12:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Courtney Hull & Bill McKibben:
I have been researching and disseminating information about Terra Preta soil technology over the last eight months or so, starting threads in many science forums, sending information to energy policy people, and commenting on any stories in the popular press concerning bioenergy, global warming, sustainable farming, etc., etc.

Carbon to the Soil technology represents the most comprehensive, low cost, and productive approach to long term stewardship and sustainability.Terra Preta Soils, a process for Carbon Negative Bio fuels, massive Carbon sequestration, 1/3 Lower CH4 & N2O soil emissions, and 3X Fertility Too !

I thought the current news and links on Terra Preta (TP)soils and closed-loop pyrolysis would interest you all.


SCIAM Article May 15 07;

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID

After many years of reviewing solutions to anthropogenic global warming (AGW) I believe this technology can manage Carbon for the greatest collective benefit at the lowest economic price, on vast scales. It just needs to be seen by ethical globally minded companies.

The main hurtle now is to change the current perspective held by the IPCC that the soil carbon cycle is a wash, to one in which soil can be used as a massive and ubiquitous Carbon sink via Charcoal. Below are the first concrete steps in that direction;

S.1884 – The Salazar Harvesting Energy Act of 2007
A Summary of Biochar Provisions in S.1884:
Carbon-Negative Biomass Energy and Soil Quality Initiative for the 2007 Farm Bill

http://www.biochar-international.org/newinform new legislation.html

Please: CALL YOUR REPRESENATIVES to SUPPORT S.1884!!


There are 24 billion tons of carbon controlled by man in his agriculture and waste stream, all that farm & cellulose waste which is now dumped to rot or digested or combusted and ultimately returned to the atmosphere as GHG should be returned to the Soil.

If you have any other questions please feel free to call me or visit the TP web site I've been drafted to co-administer.

http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/?q=node

It has been immensely gratifying to see all the major players join the mail list , Cornell folks, T. Beer of Kings Ford Charcoal (Clorox), Novozyne the M-Roots guys(fungus), chemical engineers, Dr. Danny Day of EPRIDA , Dr. Antal of U. of H., Virginia Tech folks and probably many others who's back round I don't know have joined.



Also Here is the Latest BIG Terra Preta (TP) Soil news;

ConocoPhillips Establishes $22.5 Million Pyrolysis Program at Iowa State 04/10/07

This Earth Science Forum thread on these soils contains further links, and has been viewed by 19,000 self-selected folks. ( I post everything I find on Amazon Dark Soils, ADS here

http://forums.hypography.com/earth-science

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real leaders
Posted by: richholland on Oct 28, 2007 4:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aspin-off company of SHELL soon goes to the stockmarket they invented a procede making energie from leaves, wood etc., for in a world with hunger the production of ethanol from food is a fascistic, abhorrent decadenzy...
The products will replace dieseloil with 30%
So the leaders in a change to other energy are the BIG COORPORATIONS.
Still a major gain in stopping th e waist of peak oil is to stop the war in IRAQ

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

terra preta links
Posted by: synalia on Oct 28, 2007 5:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The links given for the forum and the Scientific American article didn't work. Corrected, they are below. However, they must be cut and pasted, since this forum only allows 60 characters in a string. So, eliminate the spaces when you cut and paste into the url address slot.

forum:
http://forums.hypography.com/terra-preta/3451-terra- preta-parent-thread-started-all.html

Scientific American articles:

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=911528AD- E7F2-99DF-3DF1B9AD8EF2FC57&sc=I100322

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=5680B03D- E7F2-99DF-3E5744A3C0BB6E50&sc=I100322

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The young are ALWAYS ignored by the faux "environmentalists"
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 28, 2007 7:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ask them to fight for funding and giving tax breaks for solar, wind, geothermal, tidal, hemp, etc ... and they'll IGNORE you. In fact, a lot of them would prefer nuclear waste !

Ask them to LEGALIZE INDUSTRIAL HEMP and they'll LIE about it contributing to "global warming" when in fact it doesn't. Worse, they'll even call you a "hippie" and wish you were hunted down by the DEA.

With faux "environmentalists" cooperating with BIG Oil/Nuclear/Chemical/etc ..., you don't need enemies !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good one
Posted by: YogiBear on Oct 28, 2007 10:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-jxZoSf6p8

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You’ll know they are the “true leaders” IF:
Posted by: aka_bozo on Oct 29, 2007 11:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
* “they” address the over-population problem. Which, of-course, they can’t.

* “they” THEMSELVES stop popping out kids like rabbits, as ALL the previous generations have done. It’s amazing how some “righteous” environmentalist will bitch about some Humvee driving peasants, and then you find out they’ve created two tiny-humans - who will grow up to spew out more pollution that a 1000 Hummers. Plus, they’ve got 2 pooping (barking) dogs that stink-up the neighbors with air (and water) polution who are downwind. But, of course, the righteous are always the most duplicitous.

To assist with your reply, please note I don’t HAVE a Humve, I’ve got a liberal pansy Prius, and YES, I would buy another one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Creating Youth Activism
Posted by: Jeff Hoffman on Oct 29, 2007 5:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"As a young person myself, I have heard my elders say over and over, 'Where are the young people? ... Why aren't they voting? ... Back in the 1960's, young people led the way ... Do young people today just not care?'"

The youth of today are far less politically engaged as a whole than those from the Vietnam War era. The reason is that young males from that era were subject to being drafted and thus in personal danger from that immoral war. After successfully fighting for an end to the draft and seeing its results, I have concluded that we were wrong: young males should ALL be subject to a draft, no exceptions for the rich or students. While this does not directly relate to global warming, it's inconceivable that the current immoral war in Iraq, which, aside from the massive killings, has caused enormous environmental damage, could have taken place without massive protests and riots on college campuses. People who are more politically engaged will become engaged with other issues, including global warming.

So unfortunately, the cause for the political apathy of so many of today's youth is the lack of a military draft, and all progressives should support one, even those of us who oppose the military. Even though this seems counterintuitive, it's the best way to get the military back under our control and to get youth politically engaged like they used to be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Creating Youth Activism Posted by: donl51
drnoknow
Posted by: drnoknow on Nov 2, 2007 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read the LIMITS TO GROWTH.Without zero population growth ,nothing will save us from collapse.There is no technofix without a radical change of mind and a profound global awakening. Love and consciousness are upstream from all social and technological change/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]