Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

The Bottled Water Backlash

By Michael Blanding, AlterNet. Posted October 19, 2007.


The bottled water industry is on the defensive as restaurant owners and cities are canceling their bottled water contracts and advocating for tap.
bottledwater2
Advertisement

At Bella Luna Restaurant in Boston's funky Jamaica Plain neighborhood, you'll find star-shaped paper lanterns hanging from the ceiling and gourmet pizzas named after Red Sox players. Downstairs, the attached Milky Way Lounge & Lanes boasts a seven-lane bowling alley and a Latin dance night on Saturdays.

But there is one thing you won't find at either venue: bottled water.

The pledge caps a summer of organizing that has seen the backlash against bottled water go mainstream. Bella Luna isn't the only restaurant to ban bottled water from its menu. The movement burst into public view this spring when chef Alice Waters, the godmother of "California cuisine," nixed bottled water from her Berkeley, Calif., restaurant Chez Panisse. Soon after, Food Network favorite Mario Batali followed suit at his empire of restaurants including Manhattan's swish Del Posto, serving filtered tap water in glasses etched with information on the harmful environmental impact of bottled water

Then cities -- who probably have the most to gain from promoting municipal water -- got into the act. This June, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order to cancel the city's purchasing contract for bottled water, mandating instead that city departments rely on tap water that gushes down to the city from its clean reservoirs in Yosemite National Park. The next day, over heavy lobbying from the bottled water industry, Newsom along with progressive Salt Lake City Mayor Ross C. "Rocky" Anderson and Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak pushed through a resolution at the U.S. Conference of Mayors to commission a study looking at the impact of discarded bottled water bottles on city waste streams.

According to the Container Recycling Institute (CRI), 96 percent of bottled water is sold in single-size polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic bottles, which, because they are frequently consumed "on the go," end up in city trash cans rather than recycling bins. The national recycling rate for all PET bottles, including soda bottles, is just 23.1 percent, and bottled water is even lower. CRI estimates some 4 billion PET bottles end up in the waste stream, costing cities some $70 million a year in cleanup and landfill costs.

Bottled water "very clearly reflects the wasteful and reckless consumerism in this country," said Salt Lake City's Anderson in a conference call with reporters this month. "You really have to wonder at the utter stupidity and the irresponsibility sometimes of American consumers. These false needs are provided, and too often we just fall in line with what Madison Avenue comes up with to market these unnecessary products."

While falling short of a binding executive order, Anderson issued a directive to all city departments a year ago mandating that no tax money be spent on providing bottles of water for meetings and events. In coordination with CAI, the city has launched a campaign, called "Knock Out Bottled Water," with its own pledge for consumers and restaurants. (So far, 15 have signed up, most of them part of the city's popular upscale Gastronmy Inc. chain, whose flagship Market Street Grill earned "chef of the year" honors from Salt Lake City magazine.)

Other cities have separately pioneered their own efforts. New York, which gets pristine water from the Catskills, has started an advertising campaign to encourage residents to drink "cool, healthy, clean ... NYC water." In Berkeley, the school district last year replaced bottled water machines with large containers of tap. Other California cities, including Santa Barbara, Emeryville, San Leandro and Los Angeles have either cancelled bottled water contracts or instructed city departments not to buy bottled water. And this month, Boston signed on to the CAI pledge.

Nor is it just cities in on the East and West coasts that are taking action -- Ann Arbor, Mich., has already cancelled bottled water contracts, and mayors in other cities such as Urbana, Ill., and Wauwatosa, Wis., are considering similar actions. In Chicago, Mayor Richard Daley is considering a proposal to tax bottled water producers who bottle municipal water. And one of the very first cities to promote its tap water is -- of all places -- Louisville, Ky., which has distributed more than 1.8 million "Pure Tap" water bottles to residents since 1997 and branded a mascot, Tapper, to educate kids about the source of their water.

As the wave against bottled water has grown into a tide, the industry has not taken long to splash back. This August, the International Bottled Water Association published full-page ads in the New York Times and San Francisco Chronicle decrying the "misguided and confusing criticism by activist groups and a handful of mayors who have presented misinformation and subjective criticism as facts."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: water, bottled water, pepsi, coke, nestle

Michael Blanding is a freelance writer living in Boston. Read more of his writing at MichaelBlanding.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
depends where you live
Posted by: jazz35 on Oct 19, 2007 3:47 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In Ohiio we have some pretty rank water. often discolored and never tasting as good as my native New York. There are occasoinal bans on the water too. So..... I buy gallon jugs for under a dollar and know at least the color is OK.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» INCORRECT about "Ohio" Posted by: Setnakt
» RE: depends where you live Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» www.votenic.com Posted by: votenic
Nestlé and other "spring water" companies CAN be stopped.
Posted by: hotar on Oct 19, 2007 5:03 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Nestlé expressed interest in tapping a local aquifer here for bottling (3,000,000 gallons a year, from an aquifer underlying an ecologically sensitive state wildlife management area), editorials and a grassroots reaction stopped them in their tracks. All it takes is bad publicity to scare them away. Fight back!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not all bottled water is bad. Posted by: albrechtkrausse
Bottle deposit anomoly
Posted by: colinmeister on Oct 19, 2007 5:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In many states, including my state of residence, there is a nickle charge on every bottle of beer or soda sold in the state. There is no charge on still bottled water bottles, and the machines in the supermarkets where consumers can obtain refunds on recycled bottles just spit still water, wine, iced tea, and liquor bottles out.

A lot could be done by simply applying the charge to ALL beverage bottles to encourage recycling and keep plastic and glass out of landfills. I do drink the occasional bottle of Perrier - I like it, and my waistline prefers it to Coke. Being sparkling, the recycle machines will accept my empties, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great story
Posted by: Urstrly on Oct 19, 2007 5:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As someone who remembers when a cigarette in hand was the supposed mark of a sophisticated person, I find it's been replaced by the plastic water bottle. The bottle says: I don't drink soda. I stay hydrated because I know it's good for me, and I can afford to pay for it.

Perhaps you've noticed, as I have, that water fountains have become as rare as phone booths, and when you find one, the pressure may be so low that you don't want to drink from it for fear of picking up someone else's germs. I say bring em back. Give everyone you know a hard plastic water bottle; there are some very attractive ones. Put pressure on your local government to keep its water clean, and, if you need to, put a filter on your tap.

As of now, I'm off Poland Springs. Here I thought I was helping that struggling economy up in Maine when all the time it was profiting Nestle, the same company that pushed dehydrated baby formula in developing countries where there was, ironically, no pure water supply to make it safe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» www.votenic.com Posted by: votenic
The next biggest fraud...
Posted by: arshi on Oct 19, 2007 5:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Soda - go to any restaurant and order "coke or pepsi" and you will gte carbonated tap water mixed wiht corn syrup and caramel coloring - but it barely resembles the coca cola you would get in most other countries. Actually, it seems every food product served by corporations is bogus and in some case dangerous to our health.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maine beverage containers
Posted by: sigridsmith on Oct 19, 2007 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Maine can have a law requiring deposits on ALL beverage containers, why can't that be universal?

"In 1976, Maine enacted the Returnable Beverage Container Law. Maine was the first state to expand its deposit law to include juices, juice drinks, teas, sports drinks, and bottled waters. The law was expanded in 1989, after a brief campaign led by the Natural Resources Council of Maine and supported by Governor John McKernan. The expansion, implemented in 1990, covers “new age” drinks as well as wine and liquor containers.

For more information regarding Maine’s bottle bill, see the Bottle Redemption Laws & Rules at the Maine Department of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Resources." From: http://www.serconline.org/bottlebill/stateactivity.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jena,Louisiana
Posted by: esornew on Oct 19, 2007 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Simple solution. If you do not like or trust water from tap, buy a PUR counter top water filter, or it also fits snuggly into refrigerator.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jena,Louisiana Posted by: maxloen
Tap water is PERFECTLY SAFE, is it?
Posted by: wireup on Oct 19, 2007 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like hell it is! I'm sick and tired of people saying tap water is safe. IT IS NOT SAFE! I stopped drinking bottled water more than a year ago but under no circumstances would I drink tap water without filtering it. I live in a large city which fluoridates its water, like most of the major cities in the US.

Fluoride is a disaster, should NOT be consumed under any circumstances. Don't take my word for it:

http://fluoridealert.org/
http://www.mercola.com/article/links/fluoride_links.htm
http://fluoridealert.org/50-reasons.htm

And then there is chlorine:

http://www.holistichealthtools.com/chlorine.html
http://www.doulton.ca/chlorine.html

So please, stop with the BS on how SAFE tap water is, when it is NOT safe at all.

HOWEVER, in view of the fact that we must drink water and we don't want to continue to use bottled water, then we HAVE to drink tap water. So, the solution is to filter it.

I located a filter that takes out chlorine and chemicals and fluoride. The water tastes good, the filter works fine.

Do your homework. Filter your water and FORGET the nonsense that tap water is safe to drink.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a drop in the bucket
Posted by: zooeyhall on Oct 19, 2007 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I also am firmly of the opinion that the bottled water trend is environmentally wasteful and also a waste of people's money.

While this article shows some hopeful signs of reversing this trend, unfortunately the root causes of the consumerist consumptive "I'm entitled" attitudes are still ubiquitous in society.

Too many people, especially young people today, are totally absorbed and taken in by the media advertising machine. They do not think critically or question the things that are thrown at them by the media.

Until this changes, the trend described by the article is only a drop in the bucket.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» www.votenic.com Posted by: votenic
Its about time . . .
Posted by: dustdevil on Oct 19, 2007 6:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
people are starting to realize water in plastic bottles is bad for the environment. I live in the hill country of central Texas where we have great tasting well water. My wife has been indoctrinated by the fraudulent corporate advertising that
leads her to believe bottled water is cleaner and purer than tap or well water. So she buys cases of the water and we have empty plastic bottles all over our house.
Penn and Teller have made a video which shows the bad effects of bottled water and that it is not regulated as well as tap water.
The bottled water fad has gotten so big that wealthy investors
are buying up property where they can control the water. Here in central Texas where we have a lot of springfed rivers,
the Lower Colorado River Authority, who has grandfather rights, sells that water for $126 per acre foot. An acre foot is about 350,000 gallons. Do you see the profit potential here? In our area we have already stopped one multimillionaire from damming one of our rivers
which would impound public-owned water on his property.
LCRA sold him 22 million acre feet under protest from many adjacent landowners and area residents. I am sure he will continue to pursue the dam in the future.
My wife is pro-environment on most things. I will convince her that bottled water must be eliminated in daily use.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Its about time . . . Posted by: davidrossi
Bottled water...
Posted by: Bbear41 on Oct 19, 2007 7:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...Was a blessing during the Hurricane Rita evacuation. In my household we refill water bottles 3/4 full with tap water and freeze them for our 'hydration.' Don't know but some of our bottles may date back to Rita.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bottled water... Posted by: clvngodess
» RE: Bottled water... Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: NOT A GOOD IDEA Posted by: lamar
» Emergency situations Posted by: BlueTigress
mcsnanna
Posted by: Mcsnanna on Oct 19, 2007 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I grew up in Europe drinking bottled mineral water. I live in Texas now and continue drinking it. There are ways to handle the water bottles---recycling and required deposits. What about soda bottles, cooking oil bottles, shampoo, conditioner, hand soap, dish soap, detergent bottles and other such plastic containers? We over package here. It drives me bonkers. Some plastic bottles/containers (vitamins and beauty products, especially) come in boxes. So there's paper and plastic (rarely glass) to be recycled. Then there's the junk mail. I live in a small Texas town with an active recycling program. Every school parking lot (and the local animal shelter) has a paper recycling bin and can recycling bin to raise funds. I lived in a small German town for years---where our "garbage" was weighed for our bill, recycle wasn't, compost/bio wasn't. It wouldn't bother me a bit to do that here in Texas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mcsnanna Posted by: BlueTigress
Signs of a paradigm shift is great news.
Posted by: synapse on Oct 19, 2007 7:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is great news for several reasons.

Not only are the discarded bottles bad for the environment, but the production of plastic and the distribution process requires a large fossil fuel input, esp. oil.

There are also political angles to the bottled water controversy that are rarely touched upon in these discussions. In their well researched book, Blue Gold, Maude Barlow and Tony Clarke examined the planning and organization behind the corporate theft of public water supplies occurring at an alarming pace around the globe.

At international conferences attended by representatives from Nestle, Bechtel, and the U.N., the newfound popularity of bottled water had looked upon as a way to condition the public into thinking of water as a commodity. Attendees concluded at one such conference that water is NOT a basic human right, it is a human need but not a human right. These proclamations were behind a new push to privatize municiple water supplies. Local water sources were to no longer be under the watchful eye or control of the community it had been serving for generations, the plan was to privatize it for a fraction of its real worth and sell it to the highest bidder even if that bidder was a corporation or an entity in another country. This sets up a situation where, potentially, some locals are unable to afford or have reasonable access to their local water sources. Similar conditions and worries led to citizen-led backlashes in India and Latin America.

Barlow mentioned the worry that the new water barons had over growing public opposition. This is a recurrent theme with groups like the Trilateralists (formed by Rockefeller and Brzezinski and dominating American politics starting with the Carter administration) who are famous for saying "there is an excess of democracy" in the world.

Whether the concern is environmental, including bottles going into landfills, the health concerns from xenoestrogens and carcinogens as byproducts of the breakdown of plastics harming humans and wildlife, the waste of fossil fuels during production and distribution, or the perversion of our political system - this new paradigm shift is excellent news!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bottled Water Is A Waste Of Money
Posted by: InsertNameHere on Oct 19, 2007 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Drinking water, like oxygen is essential for life. Food is essential to, but we accept that a price must be paid for it because there generally is labor involved in the production and handling of food.

Water and air are not made by man nor do they require processing before consumption, except for municipal water being treated. Water treatment is paid for by taxes or by your water bill. These are concepts we have also come to accept. Buying bottled water just seems like a monumental waste of money. Yes, it is usually cheap, but a waste of money is a waste of money. Bottled water has its merits in emergency situations, but emergency crews can also set up mobile pumping and processing equipment.

It seems to me that whatever argument you can make for bottled water, there is technological solution that makes buying it redundant.

On a side note: You know that bottled water is hugely profitable when the display ad on Coke and Pepsi machines is for their bottled water product instead of their marquee soda beverage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't buy water-purification products unless you know you need them.
Posted by: tommy_slothrop on Oct 19, 2007 8:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most municipal water is perfectly safe. If yours isn't ask the people who provide it why. It's not that difficult for most cities. Of course, it would be easier if people didn't waste it watering lawns, etc.

Filters can leach chemicals and are only good for removing some microbiological contaminants. They can provide an environment that promotes bacterial growth. They are useless for removing chlorine and fluoride. If you want to remove chlorine shake or stir the water and let it sit for a while.

Ion-exchange resins can leach petrochemicals.

These products are mostly just consumer items that companies try to scare people into buying - like any number of consumer goods. Corporate-induced fear is much more dangerous to most people than contaminated water.

Take a look at the world around you. The fear industry tries to scare people into buying crap they'd be better off without. Then it generates more fear to promote wars to secure resources needed to produce, distribute and dispose of said crap.

We need a new economic paradigm. Work less. Consume less. Live more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

waters age
Posted by: 360guy on Oct 19, 2007 8:31 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'rusty lead pipes'...??? lead was used I believe for the reason it does not RUST...!!!??!!! probably 98% of muicipal 'tap' water thru the pipes goes down the 'sewer' ... chlorine by-products are carcinogenic..[ see JOURNAL of NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE 6/18/97 page 848- 856... report on univ of helsinki study...] nearly all POU [point of use] filters 'make bad water ...taste good' [NEARLY ALL... POISONS ...CHEMICALS.... CARCINOGENS AND DBP'S HAVE NO TASTE OR ...SMELL IN THE BEGINNING......!!!!!!] ...FOR PERSONAL HEALTH ...HYDRATE W/ HEALTHY, 3RD PARTY CONFIRMED TO HIGHEST LEVELS BY NSF.ORG ....FILTERED WATER ...NO FILTER CAN DO EVERYHTING ... HOWEVER ONE COMPANY HAS THE MOST EFFECTIVE POU SYSTEM WITH NSF.ORG CERTIFICATION TO HIGHEST LEVEL FOR THE LARGEST NUMBER OF CONTAMINENTS [ INCLUDING DBP'S ]..FOR LARGEST NUMBER OF GALLONS [WITH STAINLESS STEEL HOUSING AND 25 YR WARRANTY...] AND THAT IS FROM THE COMPANY THAT CREATED THE CARBON BLOCK FILTER IN 1974...MULTIPURE..... WWW.MULTIPUREUSA.COM/ELLIOTT3 .... EITHER ONE HAS THE MOST EFFECTIVE FILTER CAPABLE OF MAKING THE WATER HEALTHIER ...OR ONE.... IS THE FILTER... OH AND THE 'FILTERS' MENTIONED IN ARTICLE BY NAME ..."MAKE BAD WATER...TASTE GOOD"... " _ _ I T A .. is better' is owned by the chlorine bleach company clorox....which adverts HEAVILY TO INFLUENCE PEOPLE TO ....BUY A PRODUCT THAT MAKES [ I REPEAT...] 'BAD WATER TASTE... 'GOOD'... SO PRAISE THE MUNI WATER SUPPLY AND SERVE THE H2O THRU A CERTIFIED TO HIGHEST LEVELS OF TESTING BY INDEPENDENT 3RD PARTY WWW.NSF.ORG AND THE CORRCT ANSWER IS...multipure !!!!! HOME IMPROVEMENT..HEALTH AND FINANCIAL IMPROVEMENT PLUS CUTS DOWN ON THE CARBON FOOTPRINT AND 'DISASTER OF PLASTIC' FOSSIL FUEL PHTHALATE POISONED FOOD AND DRINK....YEAH I BELIEVE IN GIVING INFO THAT WILL CHANGE OR SAVE LIVES.... BIGGEST CAUSE OF DOMESTIC 'COMPANION' ANIMALS DYING IS....CANCER... DUE TO THE DBP'S FROM CHLORINATED MUNI WATER WHICH STILL HAS THEM ..AFTER THE CHLORINE GAS HAS DISSIPATED ... SO FOR PEOPLE PETS AND PLANET.... MULTIPURE... CONSUMERS WILL BUY WHAT IS GOOD FOR THEM IF THEY ARE NOT 'MISLED' BY THE ' MSM MEDIA 'ADVERTISING.... [MAY HAVE GUESSED ..MULTIPURE IS INDEPENDENT DISTRIBUTORS ... MAKING A TRUTHFUL HEALTHY DIFFERENCE .... FOR THE MOST IMPORTANT 'BODY' OF WATER ON EARTH.......MINE...!!!! YOURS!!!!! YOUR PETS...!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Stop using all CAPs, It makes reading too hard Posted by: common intelligence
William Middlemas
Posted by: wmiddlemas on Oct 19, 2007 8:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One thing that all States should implement for all bottled drinks is the returnable, reusable glass bottle, the kinds that were in use before the 1970's. That would help reduce an enormous amount of trash not to mention oil. Of course the plastic bottle lobby might have something to say about such a revolutionary turnabout.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Simple personal solution, Bottle & Filter your own!
Posted by: common intelligence on Oct 19, 2007 9:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Coming from a heritage of mountaineering and climbing I have seen the whole evolution of the scam of bottle water.

Funny thing is I as well as oh so many outdoor types have been carrying our own bottles filters where ever we go. All because the natural sources, streams and lakes, etc. have all been contaminated by giardia and other nasty things from over use and abuse. I remember when we didn't need filters or a bottle. Only a sierra cup to take a dip out of the creek. That's long gone now by TOO MANY PEOPLE, with absolutely poor ecological minds.

The best approach for "guchi" minded flat-landers is buy a nice colored, liter, "Nalegene" bottle at a back packing store, and a simple filter if you'r paranoid about city water quality.
DO it your self ! Who know you might set a trend,
(DUh, we back packers already did!). Now get on board.
Stop being down right lazy.

The amount of money you'll save will be phenominal. But more important the waste you will stop is righteous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where have all the Water Fountains gone?
Posted by: common intelligence on Oct 19, 2007 9:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One blogger just above mentioned that they seemed to have gone the way of the phone booth.

One of my biggest pet peeves is that the city and county governments should provide public toilets and water fountains through out their towns.

It should not be the obligation or the espense of businesses to provide these basic human needs. Nor should business have to be the one that provide the toilet paper and soap for everyone that wanders in to their establishment to use the camode.

Yet it is not even concidered at all a priority or even a thought by these bastians of civilization.

It sure would make towns friendly places instead of just places to consume (plastic bottles).

I propose a nation wide action by citzens to "tell" their governments to provide these basic facilities to the the over head of all towns and cities. It is just a simportant a trash pick-up and safety for children.

Money is not an issue! This is civilization, right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» forgive the typo's please Posted by: common intelligence
At least put a deposit on the *#@)*!!@XX(*& things!
Posted by: Lloyd Drako on Oct 19, 2007 9:33 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where I live, you can keep your recorked bottle of wine to take home from a restautant, theres a deposit on beer cans and bottles, wine cooler bottles, soda cans and bottles and even plastic soda bottles, but plastic water bottles litter the roadsides. Leaving aside the fact that most of the stuff is just filtered tap water anyway. Mencken was right: you can't lose money underestimating the intelligence of the American people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Author is an elitist jerk
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Oct 19, 2007 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"And one of the very first cities to promote its tap water is -- of all places -- Louisville, Ky., which has distributed more than 1.8 million "Pure Tap" water bottles to residents since 1997 and branded a mascot, Tapper, to educate kids about the source of their water."

Why does that surprise the author? Statements like that make it easy to figure out why so many rural and middle-Americans despise the left.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Author is an elitist jerk Posted by: raywigton
Take a look outside the country, please.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 19, 2007 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People know what's going on - private corporate interests are on a global quest to privatize water supplies so that they can continue to keep the public in a position of debt slavery. Bottled water is just a tiny part of the push.

These are the same corporate interests who have done such a good job of polluting natural water supplies with endocrine disrupters, industrial solvents, petroleum residues and gasoline additives, as well as with fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides - all while fighting as hard as they can to prevent government regulation of industrial emissions and agricultural runoff.

Look at the situation in Iraq and Afghanistan as an example, where the very corporate interests that finance U.S. political elections were given billions in contracts to 'rebuild the water supply'.

For some reason, Alternet publishes a lot of articles like this one that seem to assume that the U.S. public isn't interested in anything that happens outside the U.S. borders - a very insular and bizzare viewpoint that mimics that of the majority of the corporate press.

For a wider view, see:
Busting the Water Cartel, A Report From Inside the Activist Coalition at the World Water Forum
by Holly Wren Spaulding, Special to CorpWatch
March 27th, 2003

Water for Profit, CBC
Water, like air, is a necessity of human life. It is also, according to Fortune magazine, "One of the world's great business opportunities. It promises to be to the 21st century what oil was to the 20th."

One other point - as far as the 'conscious' Whole Foods chain goes, that's a bad joke. They are a union-busting concern based in Texas, and behave no differently from any other corporate supermarket chain. Yes, they sell organic food, at inflated prices, to anyone who can afford to pay - bottled water writ large.

neurolingo.gnn.tv

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bottled water is just the tip of the iceburg
Posted by: frantaylor on Oct 19, 2007 10:58 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you're going to think about the true costs of bottled water, why not extend your thinking a bit to foods like ice cream. Ice cream is a by-product of electricity and refrigeration. It would not exist as a product if it were not for our modern food distribution network, with its football-field sized freezers and armadas of refrigerated trailers. Bottled water needs no special handling, but ice cream must be kept under fairly close temperature control from the moment it leaves the cow until you pull it out of the display case. All of this refrigeration requires vast amounts of energy in the form of electricity and diesel fuel.

Think about this next time you congratulate yourself for your political correctness with that pint of Wavy Gravy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get your numbers right if you want credibility
Posted by: northerner on Oct 19, 2007 11:05 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think bottled water is both a scam and a waste, but the author does no credit to himself or to Food & Water Watch when he quotes the ludicrous figure of 1.5 billion barrels of oil used to make plastic water bottles.

A quick visit to Food & Water Watch's website turns up the estimate of 47 million gallons of oil for America's water bottle, or 1.12 million barrels of oil.

But hey, what's 133,000% among friends? It's not like anyone will take your numbers particularly seriously anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Minneapolis rocks
Posted by: chaoslegs on Oct 19, 2007 11:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have a new filtration system. The pipes to the house are good, not like the 120 yr old apartment building I used to live in.

Another nice trick for those wanting to for go the water bottle. Take an empty water bottle, re-usable type, through airport security and fill it up in a drinking fountain after security. Saves money. Airport is a place you can still find drinking fountain. Post 3-1-1 rules, it is the smartest way to hydrate yourself on the other side of airport security!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

George Veronis
Posted by: veronis on Oct 19, 2007 12:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My wife and I have never been able to figure out how or why this craze on bottled water originated. We use a Brita fliter that sits in our kitchen sink to remove the faint chlorine taste and we find that restaurants serve good tapwater.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tap water +filter = best water available
Posted by: drblack on Oct 19, 2007 12:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tap water actually has standards while bottled water has no standards.
If yours tastes funky or you want to remove chlorine and fluorine and other slight contaminants get a Brita, or PUR or other brand of water filter and you will have good tasting and safe water.

Bottled water can contain ANYTHING and still be sold. It also sits on shelves for long periods...what grows in it during that time?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A poor comparison
Posted by: drblack on Oct 19, 2007 12:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nobody is saying do without water as you are saying do without ice cream.
There is simply a better and more healthful way of drinking water.
Facts have nothing to do with political correctness.

Ice cream could exist in cold climates naturally as well so your statement falls down. During long stretches of very cold weather I do store my food out side and shut off my Freezer and fridge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A poor comparison Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: A poor comparison Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: A poor comparison Posted by: raywigton
Bottom Lines On Drinking Water
Posted by: Jeff Hoffman on Oct 19, 2007 12:28 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Buying ANY type of bottled water is environmentally destructive, because you're not only consuming the bottles instead of just drinking water, you're also supporting the taking of water from its watershed.

2. Municipal tap water is "purified" by adding chlorine or chloramine. This needs to be done in municipal water supplies in order to prevent cholera. So anyone who opposes filtration systems is telling you to ingest one of these harmful chemicals.

3. Drinking filtered tap water is fine just about anywhere in the U.S.; there's no reason to buy bottled water. Just put a filter on your kitchen faucet that is rated to filter whichever disinfectant your local water agency uses.

4. There's a huge difference between bottled spring water and bottled "drinking" water, the latter of which is just tap water and is a big ripoff, while the former is pure water with no chemicals added. But hey, a sucker is born every minute and fools and their money are soon parted, so many people waste their money on bottled drinking water. The reason not to buy spring water is to prevent the ecological harms that its consumption causes, but it's certainly a superior alternative to bottled "drinking" water.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Water can really suck – regardless ...
Posted by: artifax on Oct 19, 2007 1:04 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, tap water can contain parasites that survive chlorination and quietly wreck your health in unsuspecting ways. Most MD's and lay persons believe this to be a problem of foreign nations. Completely wrong – it is very widespread here too. So the "Tap is Safe" contingent is ignorant of this. (They don't die in your swimming pool chlorine either, BTW).

Filters are limited in their efficacy (cheapies like Brita are a joke), ever-dwindling in effectiveness as they clog, and remove little of the nasty chemicals put in to make tap "safe" (that don't). All other forms of water purification are, one way or another, limited too.

BTW, the NYC drinking water reservoirs still have raw or barely procesed sewage being dumped in them 15+ years after I worked for an environmental group on water issues. And the hotter the tap water the more it can leach lead from solder in your supply lines.

Sure, I'd prefer good water from my faucet, but so much needs to be done to fix the home water supply. Bottled water of high standards can be a good way to avoid parasites and chemicals in the mean time, and may have to have a role until things improve. Forcing standards and environmental responsibility on the industry is a start. Why was it never done in the first place?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Spend Your Money Helping the Poor, Not Buying Bottled Water
Posted by: sofla100 on Oct 19, 2007 1:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you do a little research you can find good filtration systems; therefore, it seems this is the best alternative in most circumstances. I would suggest people should also consider:

Several bottle watered companies have been accused of false advertising and this may be a widespread problem. In other words, even if they say they are using "spring water," they may just be bottling tap water. The motivation, higher profits, of course.

Bacteria and other chemicals may be in bottled water in significant quantities that consumers are not aware of. This has been reported as a problem. The only way to determine this is with random sampling of the bottled product. However, the USA does not have a system nor any real regulation of what bottled water producers put out. In other words, you are at their mercy, do you feel you can trust them?

Bottled water producers are mostly big corporations that make billions of dollars off the product. They are part and parcel of the well-moneyed, corporate elite. Why not, however, spend your money on something useful to humanity and those who are less fortunate? There are many good and progressive organizations and causes that need our cash to help people, why throw money to some CEO's BMW payments when the homeless need it much more? Think about it.

Even with recycling, valuable natural resources and oil are used to manufacture the bottles for this product. Not only that, significant resources and oil are utilized to transport it to stores for purchase. This does not support conservation.

If you need to "be seen" drinking bottled water in public to "look like you are somebody," please go get some counseling to work on your self-esteem. A healthy ego and sense of self
are not dependent on such ridiculous externals. Real women and real men don't need "bottled water" to be cool.

It appears to me there are any number of good reasons why we all should avoid the bottled product. Again, I am aware that water systems do very considerably across the USA. But, I do know many filtration systems are available and I would bet they will give you just as good, or better, a product then much of what bottled water is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bottlers
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Oct 19, 2007 3:23 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will not buy bottled water. the filter I installed on the sink is just fine. We did taste tests and never could tell which was which. But it's a twofer, coca-cola (used to be a big fan)is nothing but a greedy pig and corporate bully,not to mention another one of the water thieves. No kidding,where did they get the idea that they should control the whole soda market by collusion and strong-arming? Why should I buy water at ten times the cost,just because they put it in a bottle?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Finally!
Posted by: Mercurial Georgia on Oct 19, 2007 3:44 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think citizens have a right to their water, not for it to be bottled and sold elsewhere, or resold back to them, what is their right in the first place!

If you are worried about your tap water, boil it, it's what I do and I drink gradually watered down tea all day, it's good for your teeth.

...and I hate the taste of plastic. Granted, the taste of water can get metallic in the summer, but it's still better than plastic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THERE'S MONEY TO BE MADE!
Posted by: dsv70 on Oct 19, 2007 4:47 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Howdy, folks. I don't BUY bottled water at all. I bottle some of the filtered water from work and I simply drink from the not-so delicious tap water of Long Beach, CA. I could never bring myself to BUY water, regardless of price, because it's simply a ridiculous idea considering all the healthy and plentiful water that's provided by the city. So, I just collect plastic bottles from around the neighborhood, from friends and coworkers and at the end of the month I recycle them and get about thirty dallahz (30 bucks). Grandpa would be proud. Now, let's talk about $5.00 cups of java...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bottled water
Posted by: donl51 on Oct 19, 2007 7:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A fool and their money are soon parted!,tap watersfine, add a good filter if you like change it now and then, I can't wait until some real smart entrepreneur comes along w/bottled air! we're in america/rika,whichever ! we're not in INDIA drinking rebottled peirre out of the Ghengis!...PS..drink when you're thirsty ,the more you drink the more your body will crave, isn't healthy...I'm 62 do fine ,have younger friends who can't last 2 hours w/o ''hydrating'',give me a break!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» THEY HAVE BOTTLED AIR! Posted by: Axiom69
The Unrecognized Psychological hook of Bottled water
Posted by: common intelligence on Oct 19, 2007 10:22 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have watched this phenomena grow since it's inception.
And I have figured it out.

If you look at the "packaging", not the names or labels they all have one thing in common. (I'll get back to that in a couple of sentences here....)

But did you ever notice, much less question how it is people drink these bottles of water? For my self, I don't because I like a nice big mouth filling swallow that quenches my thirst. SO I carry my own wide mouth Back packing bottle. I just twist off the lid and pour it right down my gullet and over my head sometimes. (Now back to the point....)

These bottle water drinkers have to pop the top and SUCK a damn nipple with repetitive SUCKS, just like a baby bottle.

The friggin bottled water mouth piece is a pacifier. Just watch people suck on them. It' s real simple to see we have a society of insecure people grabbing the only sense of impulsive security they can get their hands on that is socially acceptable.

Yup these marketing people really know how to manipulate the unconscious minds of nimble morons. All the way to the bank.

Go a head suck'm up!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BOTTLED WATER SO THE F- WHAT...
Posted by: Michiganman on Oct 19, 2007 10:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...I buy a 6 pack then refill it for the next 2 months. Yea I get stomach aches and runes but what the hell i can't drink out of the river that's private property....sheesh

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Water should be free and readily available everywhere...
Posted by: rancespergl on Oct 20, 2007 4:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...just like national universal health care.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: