Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Environment

Preventing Extinction: The Miracle of the Frozen Zoo

By Alisa Opar, Plenty Magazine. Posted October 13, 2007.


With the California Condor already saved, genetic samples from endangered species at the Frozen Zoo will prevent extinctions all over the planet.
picture5
lskldf
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

On a sunny spring afternoon, the San Diego Zoo is teeming with shorts-clad tourists of all ages. While most visitors gravitate toward the pandas, giraffes, and gorillas, one little boy seems particularly taken with the Javan bantengs, a species of endangered Southeast Asian wild cattle that can grow to be seven feet long and weigh nearly a ton. Asked which one is his favorite, the child sizes up each of the animals before settling on a male with a dark blue-black coat grazing closest to him. It happens to be the spitting image of another banteng that died in 1980, and the resemblance is more than superficial: The four-year-old animal at the zoo is its clone.

The banteng wouldn't be alive if it weren't for a satellite program of the San Diego Zoo located 35 miles north of the city, in Escondido. It too houses an impressive collection of exotic animals, but there are no tourists milling about here. Tucked in a corner room on the first floor of the zoo's Center for Conservation Research, its inhabitants -- not entire animals, but samples of their sperm, eggs, embryos, tissue, and other cells -- are cryogenically preserved. Inside one of its thousands of vials, which are stored on tall racks and kept in huge cylindrical stainless-steel freezers, are cells from the banteng that scientists preserved 27 years ago.

Welcome to the Frozen Zoo, perhaps the world's largest repository of genetic samples from endangered species. For the past three decades, scientists have relied on its collection to carry out a variety of critical conservation and research efforts. And with the number of endangered species on the rise, its leaders hope to one day stockpile samples from virtually every type of animal on Earth.

When geneticist Oliver Ryder and his colleagues began collecting samples for the Frozen Zoo 31 years ago, they had no idea how essential these actions would be to saving endangered species. The project was the brainchild of pathologist Kurt Benirschke, who led the Frozen Zoo until Ryder took over 15 years ago. These days, Ryder sports a neat salt-and-pepper beard, wears a button-down shirt and slacks, and socks with his sandals. His serious demeanor drops occasionally when, without changing his facial expression, he cracks a joke to lighten the mood. But he's all business as he explains that he began freezing cells because of all their practical uses. Zoos often held only one animal of an extremely rare species, he says, and when that creature died, scientists lost the opportunity to study it. Ryder was also interested in studying the chromosomes of various animals to determine how closely related they were to each other (a science that was cutting-edge at the time). So he and his colleagues decided to freeze and stockpile viable cells at every opportunity to save them for later studies.

Over time, advances in technology allowed the preserved cells to be used for a wider variety of research and conservation activities. Today, the Frozen Zoo is a multinational research facility that stores samples from more than 7,200 animals representing some 675 species. Hundreds of scientists across the globe rely on its resources in their work to save endangered and threatened animals, and for a host of other purposes. The facility is run out of the department of Conservation and Research for Endangered Species (CRES), a center funded by the nonprofit Zoological Society of San Diego, along with grants from many other institutions.

Although the cells can be used for cloning, the zoo's purpose isn't to create carbon copies of endangered or extinct animals. In fact, it's quite the opposite. "What we're trying to conserve is the genetic diversity of species," says Ryder, which gives animals the best chance of survival in the wild.

As he walks through the labs adjacent to the Frozen Zoo, Ryder explains how samples from, say, a bush buck on the African savannah come to "live" in this frigid repository. Scientists collect samples from animals in zoos and in the wild (often the tab of skin that's removed when an animal is tagged), and send them to the Frozen Zoo to be deposited. The cells are divided, processed, placed in vials, and then frozen in liquid nitrogen, which preserves them for an estimated 10,000 years. When researchers need a sample, they remove it from the freezer and thaw out the cells.

The zoo's workings are comparable to a bank -- researchers deposit and withdraw samples as needed. "It's not a mausoleum," Ryder says, lifting a rack from one of the freezers with gloved hands and getting enveloped in the mist formed from the nitrogen vapor condensing water in the air. "This isn't supposed to be just a place for the DNA of disappearing species. It's a tool to prevent extinctions."

One of the most successful conservation efforts aided by the Frozen Zoo is the California condor recovery project. The program is headed by Mike Wallace, a lanky, tanned wildlife biologist whose office is one floor above and around the corner from the Frozen Zoo. Today he is willing to chat, but only for a few minutes. He's itching to drive south to Baja, Mexico, to scour a canyon where he's pretty sure a pair of the endangered birds of prey is tending to an egg. His hunch proves right; the egg was the first to be laid by a California condor living in the wild in more than 60 years. And earlier this year, for the first time in nearly a century, a condor was spotted flying over San Diego.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: endangered species, dna, frozen zoo, san diego zoo

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Who is kidding who?
Posted by: Constitutionalist75 on Oct 13, 2007 1:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While the scientists at the San Diego Zoo are freezing endangered species to prevent extinction, their fellow humans are busy endangering them with relentless growth of the human population and its economic expansion. So, who is going to freeze and revive the scientists at the Zoo when the biosphere finally collapses and all the species are extinct? What a bizarre scene that nobody will be left alive to see - a zoo full of frozen specimens and no one alive to process them!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Give the zoo scientists a break... Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: Who is kidding who? Posted by: donl51
» RE: Who is kidding who? Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» Insults! Posted by: frankly1
» After... Posted by: Bbear41
» RE: After... Posted by: Constitutionalist75
» RE:RE:(Mon?) After... Posted by: matti
Individuals in a species have value too.
Posted by: aouie01 on Oct 13, 2007 4:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Depending on how one understands life, values can vary. But, it would be nice if societies tried to value the individual living beings with a similar consideration to that given to species (albeit smaller in magnitude).
Sincerely,
Aouie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

this seems to be a relatively "pure" scientific project (can't see any military applications)
Posted by: Suzon on Oct 13, 2007 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but I wish that scientists and others would stop flying to the far ends of the earth to study eco-disasters.

Prevention is better than cure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Zoological masturbation!
Posted by: frankly1 on Oct 13, 2007 7:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A new term has entered the language. Zoological masturbation! I know, we can take all the samples and put them on a spaceship and send them out into space and one day, when we've all come to our senses and really miss all the species that we sent into extinction, we will fix the planet, with a sponsoship deal from the Gates foundation, bring them all back and everything will be nice and happy for ever and ever. Help me! I've started screaming and I can't stop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Zoological masturbation! Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
Shhhhhh
Posted by: Knowmad on Oct 13, 2007 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is wonderful! But let's keep it really quiet, okay.
All we need is for corporate/neocon worshipping filth like cheney/bush and their pals to find out. They'd likely kidnap these scientists, and coerce them through torture, (maybe by threatening to make them spend time in the company of coulter, o'reilly, malkin, limbaugh and the like), to freeze whatever is in their own sad makeup that causes them to be such losers, so they can come back and kill everything all over again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Shhhhhh Posted by: donl51
» RE: Shhhhhh Posted by: willymack
Maybe we should also include a Frozen Human Zoo
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 13, 2007 8:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Top candidates for inclusion:

The Iraqi people. A million have been killed already, several million more have fled the country, and there's so much depleted uranium scattered over the ground and in their water supply that the country will be feeling the effects for years. Once we get DNA samples, the ethnic cleansing can proceed, and we can finally get our hands on the oil - and thanks to the miracle of modern technology, the people will be 'saved'.

The Sudanese of the Darfur region - the same problem exists here. A fair amount of juicy oil exists right next to an inconvenient human population. Solution: put them on ice!

The Burmese people - ditto. Burma's generals find the local population an impediment to their lavish lifestyles and crony relationships with Chevron, Total, China and India. Wouldn't things be easier if the people could just be got rid of? Take some DNA samples to make sure the can be 'retrieved' later.

The people of Bangladesh - the entire country is going to be drowned by global warming, and we can't really afford to take care of 40 million environmental refugees, can we? Time to get some DNA samples! The same goes for all those South Pacific Islanders from places like Tuvalu.

After all, if the Nazis had just taken DNA samples from the Jews and other undesirables before sending them off to the gas chambers, it would all have been OK, right?

Let's be serious for a second: the problem is due to deforestation and natural resource depletion, which themselves are due, on one hand, to an out-of-control global corporate resource extraction system that sees nothing but dollar signs, and on the other, to an ever-increasing global human population.

The solution is education and access to birth control, on one hand, and an end to globalized colonial practices by Western corporations and governments, on the other.

P.S. A bunch of people in Iraq are being killed, thanks to Bush's 'noble cause' crusade . . . Do we have a DNA sample recovery team on the ground for kids like this one? take a look...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good to know
Posted by: Mercurial Georgia on Oct 14, 2007 1:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The human race is like cockroaches, we destroy, we live in filth, and one day, possibly SOON, our civilization would collapse. We probably won't go extinct though.

We should definitely aim to avoid that path. As much as I want children of my own, I'm considering rather or not I should be a godmother or adopt instead, should there be children unfortunate enough to be without parents when I get around to want to be a parent. It's not just a matter of USING less stuff, we need to reduce the total human population if everyone were to have quality lives without it being at the expense of the environment again.

...but the collapse is a big possibility, and whether that comes or not, we have already ran out of spaces for many, many, species. Like the seed banks, this is necessary, so that when we somehow have the space again, we can put them back.

I do hope they remember to collect samples from male AND female specimens of the same species though! More than just a pair ideally.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kwark
Posted by: kwark on Oct 14, 2007 2:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The California Condor remains critically endangered. To imply that we can "check-off" the California condor and move on to other species is irresponsible at best. Even "recovered" species such as the bald eagle and peregrine falcon exist in numbers that are a tiny fraction of their populations only a century ago. We continue to kill wildlife and destroy, degrade and fragment remaining habitat at an alarming rate. So great, we "save" a species in a frozen test tube. Too bad there won't be any place left for the progeny - should there be any.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have a crazy idea-
Posted by: WitchyNy on Oct 14, 2007 8:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why don't we stop destroying the environment instead?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I have a crazy idea- Posted by: Constitutionalist75
» RE: I have a crazy idea- Posted by: MobileSucks
» RE: I have a crazy idea- Posted by: Constitutionalist75
What the Frozen Zoo is actually for
Posted by: Yolanda42 on Oct 15, 2007 3:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Frozen Zoo is about having genetic material from a large number of species, many of which may not be around for very long. This may not seem useful to you but a lot of people who study everything from evolution to disease transmission have found it quite important. Nobody views the Frozen Zoo as a magical tool for repopulating the Earth with extinct species, and nobody who deals with endangered species is unaware of the problems of habitat loss, pollution, etc. When a species is gone, witty cynicisms are not going to provide us with any information about that animal, but preserved genetic material will. The Frozen Zoo will not resurrect extinct species (although who knows what the future may bring, so why would you throw away ANY potential conservation option?) but it will be the only method of getting precious remnants of information about something that is lost. I'm surprised that so many people are hostile to that idea, seemingly simply because it isn't a "magic bullet" to save the planet (something nobody claims it to be).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What the Frozen Zoo is actually for Posted by: Constitutionalist75
who will play mother and father...
Posted by: Virg on Oct 16, 2007 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...to these lab grown baby animals? for animals with sophisticated social repetoires, hairless talking apes will have a hard time reproducing the proper rearing environment. elephants, parrots, wolves, kangaroos, horses, to name a few. a human simply can not provide the phermones and behavior of a mature nurturing mother elephant or a dominant male wolf pack leader. also, how would a female elephant learn to be a good mom, and how would a female wolf learn to be alpha over her packmates? there are hormones and behaviors that would not get turned on. this genetic bank is better than nothing, but its still next to nothing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: who will play mother and father... Posted by: Constitutionalist75
it really is the height of arrogance
Posted by: unity1 on Oct 23, 2007 1:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the ark - contrary to popular myth and out dated opinion carried sperm and ovum - this idea is preposterous - destroy the animals living environment but clone the animal so human animals can view what they destroyed - its insane - humans have really lost the plot and science is a non human industry

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]