Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

The Great Plastic Bag Plague

By Tara Lohan, AlterNet. Posted September 5, 2007.


It turns out 'paper or plastic' is a life or death question for our environment.
bird
Advertisement

They're ubiquitous. They accompany us home each time we shop. They swirl about our oceans, they cling to our trees, they drift down our city sidewalks, they adorn metal fences, they're consumed by animals.

They are an urban tumbleweed, a flag of the consumer era.

Each year across the world some 500 billion plastic bags are used, and only a tiny fraction of them are recycled. Most of them will have a short lifetime with a consumer -- they'll be used for the few minutes it takes to get from the store to home and then they're thrown away.

But what does "away" really mean? Plastic shopping bags can last up to a thousand years in a landfill. In the environment, they break down into tiny, toxic particles that become part of the soil and water. Fortunately, some communities in America have started taking serious action.

Stephanie Barger has seen what washes up on the shores of Southern California. The executive director of Earth Resource Foundation, Barger has helped clean up the sands of Orange County and has helped educate people about the effects of a society that embraces disposability.

For every bag, there's a cost. Environment California reports that plastic bags, and other plastic refuse that end up in the ocean, kill up to one million sea creatures every year, such as birds, whales, seals, sea turtles, and others. And the number of marine mammals that die each year because of eating or being entanglement in plastic is estimated at 100,000 in the North Pacific Ocean alone.

The Algalita Marine Research Foundation learned that "broken, degraded plastic pieces outweigh surface zooplankton in the central North Pacific by a factor of 6-1. That means six pounds of plastic for every single pound of zooplankton." Which means, when birds and sea animals or looking for food -- more often, they are finding plastic.

Our history with plastic bags is short but significant. The Film and Bag Federation, an industry group, reports that plastic sandwich bags were unveiled in 1957 and quickly became a part of our routine, with department stores adopting plastic shopping bags in the late '70s and supermarkets employing them by the early '80s.

Although bags are given out free these days, they are not without their costs. Retailers in the United States spend $4 billion a year on plastic bags, which gets passed on to customers as higher prices.

A global problem

According to Vincent Coob, founder of reusablebags.com, about 500 billion to 1 trillion plastic bags are used worldwide every year and are causing a global epidemic. The enormous demand for plastic bags ties into the surging global demand for oil -- plastic bags are made from ethylene, a petroleum byproduct. In the United States alone, an estimated 12 million barrels of oil is used annually to make plastic bags that Americans consume.

"Eliminating the use of disposable plastic bags is about more than just the environment," said Barger, "it is about health, sustainability, economics and focusing on what kind of quality of life we want."

A growing list of communities and countries are beginning to rethink their dependence on plastic bags. Already a complete or partial ban on the bags has been approved in Australia, South Africa, parts of India, China, Italy, Bangladesh and Taiwan.

Africa has seen an increasing problem with bags as Environmental News Network reports, "South Africa was once producing 7 billion bags a year; Somaliland residents became so used to them they renamed them "flowers of Hargeisa" after their capital; and Kenya not so long ago churned out about 4,000 tons of polythene bags a month."

In Asia, the bags were banned in 2002 in Bangladesh after they were considered to be major factors in blocking sewers and drains and contributing to the severe flooding that devastated the country in 1988 and 1998.

Taking a different route, in 2002, Ireland imposed a 15-cent tax on bags, which led to a rapid 90 percent reduction in use. Ireland uses the tax to help fund other environmental initiatives. Bags are also taxed in Sweden and Germany, and are set to be banned outright in Paris this year.

In the United States, Californians Against Waste estimate that Americans consume 84 billion plastic bags annually. The United States has been slow out of the gate in addressing the growing problem with plastic, but recently momentum has started for positive change.

Currently 30 rural Alaskan villages and towns have banned plastic bags. And in March the city of San Francisco became the first major municipality to ban the use of plastic bags, and nearby Oakland has followed suit, but not without controversy and litigation from industry groups.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: plastic bags, plastic bag ban

Tara Lohan is a managing editor at AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
a simple solution
Posted by: walldodger1969 on Sep 5, 2007 3:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read up on hemp. It's strong,durable,.......but wait our Government has banned it's planting.......too bad.... we are like sheep.....but hey thats what we get .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: a simple solution Posted by: solrev
» Zelfo: the hemp-based plastic Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
» Good job! Kaneh bosm!!! Posted by: garry minor
» RE: a simple solution Posted by: solrev
Here, here on the hemp comment
Posted by: american on Sep 5, 2007 5:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But its value as a "drug" is why it is still illegal. The people at the apex of the marijuana business are not black and Latin, I can tell you that. Why do you think we've invaded Afghanistan, supra-policed Columbia, and invaded Iraq? --Because they satisfy various addictions.

The writer mentions $4 billion is spent annually on plastic bags - this, I agree is an atrocious waste. Do you know what else, though, Americans spend an average of 2% on "interchange fees" charged directly to merchants for credit card transactions? These fees, of course are passed directly on to us. With the Bush economy and the majority of people using credit cards/debit cards all of the time, this represents about - assuming the use of credit cards of one variety or another for three quarters of all transactions - 200 billion dollars per year (in the neighborhood of half the cost of the Iraq war over five years). This is on top of interest and is money that could be better - way better - used elsewhere, including the environment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here, here on the hemp comment Posted by: colinmeister
» Thanks!!! Kaneh bosm!!! Posted by: garry minor
» The Real Reason Hemp Was Outlawed Posted by: Jeff Hoffman
» Hear, hear! Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Hear, hear! Posted by: american
I remember in my German class my German teacher had something to say about shopping plastic bags.
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 5, 2007 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back in Germany, people usually bring their own bags to put their shopping items in rather than be given it to them in plastic bags. Something like that ought to be introduced in America.

P.S.: Thanks to all who put the word out on hemp for plastics. If I recall, hemp is biodegradable though the government not only treats it as a "dangerous drug", it also makes it nearly impossible for biodegradable plastic to go anywhere in our "free" market.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» We Need To Stop Needlessly Consuming Posted by: Jeff Hoffman
Small Items
Posted by: aahb21 on Sep 5, 2007 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What always gets me is when I buy one small item at a store, and the cashiers always want to give me a bag. When I say no thanks, they look at me weird. Somehow people are programmed to think we need a bag every time we shop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Small Items Posted by: wheresarah
» RE: Small Items Posted by: sweet_byrd
» how to respond Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: Small Items Posted by: sweet_byrd
» RE: Small Items Posted by: Iaela
» I love it when... Posted by: Habaro
» RE: I love it when... Posted by: prognog
It's not just plastic bags from the supermarket...
Posted by: beeden on Sep 5, 2007 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not just plastic bags from the supermarket, how many people use a plastic bag in their office/workplace garbage bins? Cityfolk, just think, next time you look at at the office buildings of your city, all those rooms and cells with their wastepaper/rubbish basket/bins, carefully cleaned away of an evening by the cleaners and replaced with a fresh clean plastic bag. Then there are the ones in the cafeteria, and toilets and general rubbish bins, plastic bags filling with rubbish. Millions upon millions of plastic bags are used in this way every day. Yet the lobby on the disposal of plastic bags centres/centers around what people bring home in plastic bags from the supermarket. Cleaners/office workers/businesses use more plastic bags every day, than people shopping for their groceries bring home from the supermarket. By all means, it is important to be tackling this aspect of the problem but the use of plastic bags in the workplace must be the next major area for improvement. The legalization of hemp production for sustainable, and if necessary disposable, biodegradable bags, has the potential to be a sensible solution to an urgent problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Habits are hard to change
Posted by: rhbee on Sep 5, 2007 7:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I own six reusable bags. I have placed them in my car and my work truck. But whenever I go grocery shopping I still find myself standing at the counter without my own bag from time to time. It has taken six months to get myself to add a new habit to my shopping plan. Before I lock the car, check in the back for a shopping bag. The writer suggests who the enemy is on this one, Pogo, they is us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And what about plastic garbage bags?
Posted by: workerbee on Sep 5, 2007 7:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We use canvas bags for shopping -- they're always in the car. But there are still times when we get plastic bags, and when we do we reuse them as many times as possible.

But that doesn't answer the question about plastic garbage bags. What do we do about those? What other ways are there to dispose of garbage? Not all towns have/allow cans -- or treat them kindly enough that you can use them for more than a few months.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And cat litter? Posted by: Ms. DuFontagne
» RE: And cat litter? Posted by: uness
The real question is fossil fuels or renewable energy?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 5, 2007 8:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With all due respect, paper vs. plastic is one of those meaningless choices - think about what's going into the bag! The U.S. consumes more of the world's natural productivity, per person, than anywhere else on Earth. It's completely unsustainable, and sooner or later will crash.

The use of fossil fuels is warming and destabilizing the climate, and is already causing severe crop losses in many parts of the country. Meanwhile, American 'consumers' continue to stuff their bags, paper or plastic, with energy intensive meat, processed food packaged three times in both plastic, paper and carboard, and so on.

If you stuff your consumables into paper bags, you're participating in deforestation (yes hemp is a great idea - but politicians still refuse to allow hemp cultivation - and even then, hemp could be better used for cloth production for clothing, not disposables). If you use plastic, you're still participating in disposable American culture.

The real issue is so much bigger than paper vs. plastic - it's the use of renewables (solar, wind, fossil-fuel free organic agriculture) in a resource limited reality, vs. the use of fossil fuels in an 'endless frontier' pipe dream.

How do we want to hang ourselves? Paper-based rope or plastic-based rope? Think carefully...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Plastic paddies
Posted by: seamus on Sep 5, 2007 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think i may have read this before.
I'm glad to say that the plastic bag tax has gone up to 22c here.
Why the rest of the world hasn't followed our lead is a bit of a mystery.
When I was in Africa there were big piles of rubbish that are usually eaten by animals; sensibly enough they don't eat plastic bags so they are bits of them flying around everywhere.
I used to drink out of plastic bottles as the local water isnt so good but even they can be recycled by giving them to poor children or for use in horticulture.
Plastic bags are just absolute rubbish. They're not even free; mostly the cost is factored into the price of everything you buy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"If you can't afford"
Posted by: fearn on Sep 5, 2007 8:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a reusable bag at 99 cents you can't afford to eat. It is amazing how a reasonable and sensible solution is so often rejected in America so that some guy can make a destructive buck!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What about food stamps? Posted by: zyxwvut
Plastics as Endocrine Disruptors...
Posted by: ldasteelworker on Sep 5, 2007 8:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately; you missed a very important concern about plastics...

Dr. Theo Colborn, who has written and lectured widely on the human health and environmental threat posed by endocrine disruptors and other industrially-produced chemicals at low concentrations in the environment. Bisphenol A (BPA), a plastic monomer used widely in the production of materials to package food, in plastics that are rapidly replacing steel, and as a fire retardant, has been found to have endocrine disrupting properties in every developing fetal system in which it has been tested, depending on stage of exposure and dose. Listen to an interview of her below:

Go here: ( http://www.chicagopublicradio.org/Program_WV_Series.aspx ); Click on: "End of the World"; Click on: "Better Infertility Through Chemistry".

Better Infertility Through Chemistry - Release date: 8/28/2007

Imagine if you caught a male fish in Lake Michigan, cut it open expecting to find its gonads... and instead found eggs!

Dr. Theo Colburn is the founder and president of The Endocrine Disruption Exchange, she's been a consultant and researcher for many governmental and non-governmental organizations over her career.

Dr. Colburn served on the EPA's Science Advisory Board until 2002. She directed the World Wildlife's Contaminants program for 10 years.

Her research has discovered the pervasiveness of endocrine-disrupting chemicals, especially in plastic-based-products.

The book she co-author in 1996, 'Our Stolen Future' prompted the enactment of new research and regulations in the U.S. around the world.

Dr. Theo Colburn is now the president of the "Endocrine Disruption Exchange" and explains what "Endocrine Disruption" is...


Download here: ( http://audio.wbez.org/wv/2007/08/wv_20070828b.mp3 )

Listen here: ( http://audio.wbez.org/wv/2007/08/wv_20070828b.m3u )

See Also:

( http://www.ourstolenfuture.com/index.htm )
The book: 'Our Stolen Future' brought world-wide attention to scientific discoveries about endocrine disruption and the fact that common contaminants can interfere with the natural signals controlling development of the fetus. This website tracks the most recent developments.

( http://www.endocrinedisruption.com/ )
The Endocrine Disruption Exchange, Inc is the only international organization that focuses primarily on the human health and environmental problems caused by low-dose and/or ambient exposure to chemicals that interfere with development and function, called endocrine disruptors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Pacific Garbage Maelstrom: The Great Accumulating Gyre of Plastics
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Sep 5, 2007 8:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
===
It was on our way home, after finishing the Los Angeles-to-Hawaii sail race known as the Transpac, that my crew and I first caught sight of the trash, floating in one of the most remote regions of all the oceans. ...Trashed
Across the Pacific Ocean, Plastics, Plastics, Everywhere

Charles Moore, Natural History v.112, n.9, Nov03
...
I often struggle to find words that will communicate the vastness of the Pacific Ocean to people who have never been to sea. Day after day, Alguita was the only vehicle on a highway without landmarks, stretching from horizon to horizon. Yet as I gazed from the deck at the surface of what ought to have been a pristine ocean, I was confronted, as far as the eye could see, with the sight of plastic.

It seemed unbelievable, but I never found a clear spot. In the week it took to cross the subtropical high, no matter what time of day I looked, plastic debris was floating everywhere: bottles, bottle caps, wrappers, fragments. Months later, after I discussed what I had seen with the oceanographer Curtis Ebbesmeyer, perhaps the world's leading expert on flotsam, he began referring to the area as the "eastern garbage patch." But "patch" doesn't begin to convey the reality. Ebbesmeyer has estimated that the area, nearly covered with floating plastic debris, is roughly the size of Texas.
...
What we saw amazed us. We were looking at a rich broth of minute sea creatures mixed with hundreds of colored plastic fragments-a plastic-plankton soup. ...

===
The trash vortex - GreenPeace
Chemical sponge
There is a sinister twist to all this as well. The plastics can act as a sort of “chemical sponge”. They can concentrate many of the most damaging of the pollutants found in the worlds oceans: the persistent organic pollutants (POPs). So any animal eating these pieces of plastic debris will also be taking in highly toxic pollutants.

The North Pacific gyre is one of five major ocean gyres and it is possible that this Trash Vortex problem is one which is present in other oceans as well. The Sargasso Sea is a well known slow circulation area in the Atlantic, and research there has also demonstrated high concentrations of plastic particles present in the water.
...
Of course, not all plastic floats. In fact around 70 percent of discarded plastic sinks to the bottom. In the North Sea, Dutch scientists have counted around 110 pieces of litter for every square kilometre of the seabed, a staggering 600,000 tonnes in the North Sea alone.

===
Sailing The Seas Of Trash
Vast Area Of Pacific Ocean Polluted With Plastic
"I have no doubt that some of these things that we're discovering out there have been there since the dawn of the plastic era in the 1950's," says Moore.

As plastic ages it crumbles, leaving so many tiny fragments that Moore found seawater in the Gyre contained more plastic than plankton, the tiny sea life that many ocean creatures feed on.

To jellyfish, the plastic particles seem like food.

"It's like putting them on a plastic diet," says Moore. "It becomes part of their tissue."

In his lab, Moore studies jellyfish embedded with plastic. ...


===
BlueBerry Pick'n
ThisCanadian ~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The key to the whole problem is
Posted by: Constitutionalist75 on Sep 5, 2007 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
consumer demand. As long as there is an ever-growing number of people ready pay more money for an ever-growing number of products, the environment will be polluted. To reduce that consumer demand, the human population itself must be reduced through family planning clinics in every community. Otherwise we're all just wasting our time as well as our environment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Reconsider the lock! Posted by: bifheart
» RE: The key to the whole problem is Posted by: Jeff Hoffman
» RE: Again, reconsider the lock! Posted by: Jeff Hoffman
genius !!
Posted by: madhypnotist on Sep 5, 2007 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the reason we switched to plastic is because people were screaming we were cutting down trees. A renewable resource. Now we are switching to energy saving lightbulbs that contain mercury and hybrid cars with nickel batteries. Primarily because of a "global warming" that is as cyclical as our orbit.
PANIC ! PANIC! And now we are choking on plastic....
Genius......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: genius !! Posted by: daniel347x
» There is no technofix. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Plastic Bag Ban
Posted by: broni on Sep 5, 2007 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please sign my petition to ban plastic bags in NY. My belief is that all plastics should be banned everywhere and this is one step in that direction:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/plastic-bag-ban

Thank you!

- Broni

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

reusablebags.com
Posted by: darkgrrrl on Sep 5, 2007 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I heard about this site some time ago. I did not own any shopping-type reusable bags, so I purchased a bag with its own carrying pouch to live in my purse (can't forget it that way), and a large canvas tote for the farmers market, etc. That approximately $20 one-time purchase has dramatically reduced the number of disposable plastic bags I use. Also, all grocery stores I shop at give you back 5 cents or so if you bring your own bag.

Not saying everyone should go buy new reusable bags, but I found that a compact bag that's easy to carry with me was easy to integrate into my lifestyle and easy to use, which means I actually do use it instead of forgetting it, leaving it in the car, etc.

I also highly recommend the Evert-Fresh produce bags. They greatly extend the useful life of fruits, vegetables, greens, herbs etc. and have almost eliminated food waste in my house.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: reusablebags.com Posted by: P. Hermes
Ladies, in addition to changing our bag habits, we need to change our tampons!
Posted by: sarahk on Sep 5, 2007 10:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few years ago, I read an article about a fishing crew finding a small, uninhabited island far in the ocean whose beach was covered with pink plastic tampon applicators. Good grief, I thought I have been using these type tampons because, as the manufacturers' boast, they were more comfortable to use, but I never gave a thought to the comfort of the sea animals and plants that have to live with the applicators when they inevitably wash to sea!

The cardboard tampon applicators, while not environmentally ideal, at least will decompose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: menstrual cups! Posted by: uness
» hysterectomy Posted by: veggiegrrrl
A plastic irony
Posted by: xvictor on Sep 5, 2007 10:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there's an ad for a company pushing plastic bags and stuff adjacent to the article. Isnt't that irony or what???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A plastic irony Posted by: HoboHomo
But paper bags are NOT the answer
Posted by: Crazy H on Sep 5, 2007 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was a university study a few years back (don't have the link, sorry) and it found that paper represents a very large portion of what's in landfills.

When a paper bag is dumped in a landfill and covered with other garbage, it stays dry and does not have access to light or oxygen. It doesn't degrade, it just sits there the same as a plastic bag.

Recycle, or better yet: bring in your own bags.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real question is raising animals for food or veganism
Posted by: vasumurti on Sep 5, 2007 11:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Half the water consumed in the U. S. goes to irrigate land growing feed and fodder for livestock. Huge amounts of water are needed to wash away their excrement. U. S. livestock produce 20 times as much excrement as does the entire human population, creating sewage which is 10 to several hundred times more concentrated than raw domestic sewage.

Animal wastes cause 10 times more water pollution than the U. S. human population; the meat industry causes 3 times as much harmful organic water pollution than the rest of the nation's industries combined.

Meat producers are the number one industrial polluters in our nation, contributing to half the water pollution in the U.S. The water that goes into a thousand-pound steer could float a destroyer. It takes 25 gallons of water to produce a pound of wheat, but 2,500 gallons to produce a pound of meat. If these costs weren't subsidized by the American taxpayers, hamburger meat would be $35 per pound!

The burden of subsidizing the California meat industry costs taxpayers $24 billion annually. Livestock producers are California's biggest consumers of water. Every tax dollar the state doles out to livestock producers costs taxpayers over 7 dollars in lost wages, higher living costs and reduced business income. 17 western states have enough water supplies to support economies and populations twice as large as the present.

Overgrazing of cattle leads to topsoil erosion, turning once-arable land into desert. We lose 4 million acres of topsoil each year and 85 percent of this loss is directly caused by raising livestock. To replace lost soil, we're destroying our forests. Since 1967, the rate of deforestation in the U. S. has been 1 acre every 5 seconds. For each acre cleared in urbanization, seven are cleared for grazing or growing livestock feed.

It takes 3 times as much fossil fuel energy to produce meat than it does to produce plant foods. A report on the energy crisis in Scientific American warned: "The trends in meat consumption and energy consumption are on a collision course."

Nor can fish provide any help here. The fishing industry, quite energy-intensive, has already overfished the oceans in several areas. And fish could never play a major role in the worlds diet anyway: the entire global fish catch of the world, if divided among all the world's inhabitants would amount to only a few ounces of fish per person per week.

The American Dietetic Association reports that most of mankind has lived on "vegetarian or near vegetarian diets;" meat has traditionally been a luxury. The healthiest human populations on the globe live almost entirely on plant foods. Nathan Pritikin, author of The Pritikin Plan, recommended not more than three ounces of animal protein per day; three ounces per week for his patients who had already suffered a heart attack.

Obviously the idea of providing the entire world with a Western diet is absurd. But what about satisfying today's demand for meat--which provides only a fraction of humanity with a Western diet?

If the world population triples in the next 100 years, and meat consumption continues, then meat production would have to triple as well. Instead of 3.7 billion acres of cropland and 7.5 billion acres of grazing land, we would require 11.1 billion acres of cropland and 22.5 billion acres of grazing land.

But this is slightly larger than the total land area of the six inhabited continents! We are desperately short of forests, water and energy already.

Even if we resort to extreme methods of population control: abortion, infanticide, genocide, etc...modest increases in the world population would make it impossible to maintain current levels of meat consumption. On a vegetarian diet, however, the world could easily support a population several times its present size.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

real change in the right direction
Posted by: stina723 on Sep 5, 2007 12:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clearly, it is corporations and industry standing in the way of real change in the right direction - towards a cleaner, greener,less wasteful and more efficient future for the US and the world. Isn't it time that the citizens of this world hold them accountable for their actions - isn't it their fault that we are in the predicament we are in? They (corporations, industries) are the ones who are making the stuff (styrofoam, plastic bags, chemicals) and marketing/selling it to the masses. All they see are dollar signs, essentially they are converting the resources of the earth into profits for them and destroying the earth in the process. I guess it's up to us individually - the only real power we have is to STOP BUYING THEIR TOXIC WASTEFUL INEFFICIENT PRODUCTS.

"Bryan Early, who works for the Sacramento-based Californians Against Waste, admitted the legislation was a compromise. With pressure from the grocery and plastics industries, the law includes a provision that takes away the rights of municipalities to put a tax on bags the way Ireland did."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Plastics
Posted by: Bart Thesc on Sep 5, 2007 1:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Plastics are becoming more important to us every day, however our indiscriminate uses of them will definitely be coming back to haunt us. Plastic grocery bags and water bottles are two glaring examples. Using plastics for the sake of food safety is critical. Overpackaging and using them for a few minutes of food transportation and most of all, not recycling, is squandering our grandchildrens' resources. Fifty years from now the kids will look at us incredulously and ask "You actually put petroleum in cars? What were you thinking?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's everyone's job
Posted by: ld7440 on Sep 5, 2007 4:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As much as I love the idea of using more hemp-based products (http://www.organic-nature-news.com/facts-about-hemp.html), businesses are not the only ones who should take responsibility for environmental fallout. Consumers have to change their mindsets, so that avoiding plastic becomes second nature. After using my plastic bags under my mulch, I now carry two canvas bags in my car. When I stop at the supermarket on my way home, it's easy to take the bags with me. Even then, baggers have to think twice; sometimes I have to ask them to remove the plastic bag before placing it in my canvas one! It's been 3 weeks since I brought a plastic bag home. I no longer buy bottled water; I filter my tap water and take it to work. It's a personal choice, and an easy transition to make, once we make it second nature.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mini-activism on the bag issue
Posted by: Bouldercreeker on Sep 5, 2007 10:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a personal policy of going out to my car to get my reusable bags if I happen to forget them. And when cashiers ask me if I want paper or plastic, I have a repetoire of short answers that I know the other folks in line overhear, such as "Oh, I don't do throwaway bags!" or "Oh, gosh, I sure don't need a bag for these 2 little items!" or "Oh, no thanks. I've got this cool bag of my own." (They've got a lot of hip looking bags these days, including tiny stuff sacks that fit in a purse or pocket. I try to not use shabby looking ones for fear people think reusable bags are only for aging hippies. Which I am, naturally.) I also have a chatty routine where I say "Gosh, I just read this article about how dolphins are dying because of these plastic bags that we all use for around 3 nanoseconds . . ."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Activism
Posted by: CrackerJack on Sep 6, 2007 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we want to seriously address this problem we have to be brave enough to take a stand in the community. So, how about everyone printing out 50 copies of this article, making up some fliers and handing them out outside their local supermarket? Sounds easy to me. At worst you might only get a few people to change their habits, at best you'll get 50!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Activism Posted by: logansafi
» RE: Activism Posted by: CrackerJack
Plastic Isn't Fantastic
Posted by: moolady45 on Sep 6, 2007 10:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey People;

Plastic in every shape and form is a contaminent...We are dying from a lot of plastic induced illnesses.....Just Say NO NO NO to PLASTIC!!

We can live without Plastic!!! Even though they say that Plastic is SO Important...Not even on a Real Good Day! That is the Big Companies Producing Plastic ..Saying That!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Live without plastic? Posted by: veggiegrrrl
Styrofoam while we are at it...
Posted by: herbal on Sep 6, 2007 1:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We must include the white washed styrofoam in broadening this discussion. The vaunted difference between chloroflorocarbons and florocarbons applies only to ozone depletion issues and is nearly insignificant. The nature of styrofoam is parallel to plastic bags. We, as consumers, should refuse to take any product that is offered in styro. That includes airline drinks. Stewardesses invariably have experienced the depolymerization of styrofoam cups with tea and lemon and its accompanying floating oil slick scum. Fly Alaska AL, they have converted to unbleached paper years ago. Restaurant styro take home dishes are easy to refuse; ask for paper. Be vocal and emplore the environmental groups to push the anti-plastic agenda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]