Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Do You Live in One of the World's 15 Greenest Cities?

Grist.org. Posted July 27, 2007.


Here's the top 15 cities and few runners up who have made the most impressive strides toward eco-friendliness and sustainability.
Advertisement

This article is reprinted by permission from Grist. For more environmental news and humor sign up for Grist's free email service.

These metropolises aren't literally the greenest places on earth -- they're not necessarily dense with foliage, for one, and some still have a long way to go down the path to sustainability. But all of the cities on this list deserve recognition for making impressive strides toward eco-friendliness, helping their many millions of residents live better, greener lives.

1. Rekyjavik, Iceland

Remember the grade-school memory device "Greenland is icy and Iceland is green"? It's truer than ever thanks to progress made by Iceland and its capital city in recent years. Reykjavik has been putting hydrogen buses on its streets, and, like the rest of the country, its heat and electricity come entirely from renewable geothermal and hydropower sources and it's determined to become fossil-fuel-free by 2050. The mayor has pledged to make Reykjavik the cleanest city in Europe. Take that, Greenland.

2. Portland, Oregon, U.S.

The City of Roses' approach to urban planning and outdoor spaces has often earned it a spot on lists of the greenest places to live. Portland is the first U.S. city to enact a comprehensive plan to reduce CO2 emissions and has aggressively pushed green building initiatives. It also runs a comprehensive system of light rail, buses, and bike lanes to help keep cars off the roads, and it boasts 92,000 acres of green space and more than 74 miles of hiking, running, and biking trails.

3. Curitiba, Brazil

With citizens riding a bus system hailed as one of the world's best and with municipal parks benefiting from the work of a flock of 30 lawn-trimming sheep, this midsized Brazilian city has become a model for other metropolises. About three-quarters of its residents rely on public transport, and the city boasts over 580 square feet of green space per inhabitant. As a result, according to one survey, 99 percent of Curitibans are happy with their hometown.

4. Malmö, Sweden

Known for its extensive parks and green space, Sweden's third-largest city is a model of sustainable urban development. With the goal of making Malmö an "ekostaden" (eco-city), several neighborhoods have already been transformed using innovative design and are planning to become more socially, environmentally, and economically responsive. Two words, Malmö: organic meatballs.

5. Vancouver, Canada

Its dramatic perch between mountains and sea makes Vancouver a natural draw for nature lovers, and its green accomplishments are nothing to scoff at either. Drawing 90 percent of its power from renewable sources, British Columbia's biggest city has been a leader in hydroelectric power and is now charting a course to use wind, solar, wave, and tidal energy to significantly reduce fossil-fuel use. The metro area boasts 200 parks and over 18 miles of waterfront, and has developed a way-forward-thinking 100-year plan for sustainability. Assuming civilization will last another 100 years? Priceless.

6. Copenhagen, Denmark

With a big offshore wind farm just beyond its coastline and more people on bikes than you can shake a stick at, Copenhagen is a green dream. The city christened a new metro system in 2000 to make public transit more efficient. And it recently won the European Environmental Management Award for cleaning up public waterways and implementing holistic long-term environmental planning. Plus, the pastries? Divine.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: green cities, green design, green building

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What's really sad is that...
Posted by: HeroesAll on Jul 27, 2007 12:50 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...even the best performers are still not doing well enough. And by "well enough", I mean they're not making sufficient changes sufficiently soon to prevent runaway global warming.

It's good that something is happening. It's tragic that the best we can do, after decades of struggle, is so paltry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» and don't like brown people? Posted by: veggiegrrrl
What about Cuba, shouldn't they have some cities on the list?
Posted by: Langseth on Jul 27, 2007 2:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After seeing the film How Cuba survived Peak Oil, it seems like they should have some cities on this list. PS: I didn't watch this movie to learn about Cuba, but to learn about Pek Oil (and global warming, mass consumptions, ...). Cuba had to deal with a dramatic reduction of fossil fuels to a mere fraction of their pre 1990 levels. For me that means that it is possible to cut down, it has been proven without the community collapsing. So when somebody is saying "it can't be done, we can't stop using cars, ...", then I know otherwise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

green cities
Posted by: daodeyao on Jul 27, 2007 3:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bangkok?
Get real!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: green cities Posted by: mercianomad
» RE: green cities Posted by: kiel
» Chicago?!? Posted by: vangogh69
Alternet! A little good news once in a while is nice to hear too.
Posted by: american on Jul 27, 2007 4:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks.

We need both sides. And the good with the bad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Recycling in Asia more common than
Posted by: sunhelen on Jul 27, 2007 4:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As far as I know almost all Asian countries recycle cooking oil, although not necessarily to make biofuel. Taipei, Taiwan should be on this list for all their efforts over the last few years. Car ownership has not expanded with development in the same way as in other Asian cities, and the city has a new and beautiful subway system. In addition, Taiwan recycles the most trash of all Asian countries.

I live in South Korea. In my apartment complex, there are recycling bins for things that can't even be recycled in the US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kampala?
Posted by: seamus on Jul 27, 2007 6:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I went to see the throne of the Buganda Kingdom there but it had been eaten by goats... i guess that's going back to nature for ya.
Kampala is one of the dirtiest, most polluted towns I've ever been and the Ugandan goverment is deliberatly letting it's population spiral to boost it's economy, rainforests are being cut down to grow biofuel.
And Bangkok... It's so congested that middle-class families have desks built into the back seats of their cars as that's the only chance their kids have to do homework...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If only Rekyjavik cared about whales as well
Posted by: pepe5 on Jul 27, 2007 6:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The health of our oceans are important too and that means keeping the balance. Iceland's arrogance on this matter with the continuation of killing whales is rather hypocritical.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Portland!!
Posted by: Bambi on Jul 27, 2007 8:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I moved back to the San Francisco Bay Area after living in Portland for 12 years. No comparison. I'm underwhelmed by San Francisco and it's mean drivers, (as one person here said) ass to mouth vehicles. I couldn't wait to get back to Portland; so here I am.

Portland, OR is a hard act to follow. Years of stellar urban planning, the largest urban forest in the world, wonderful public transit, abundant community media and conscious humans make it the only city I've ever wanted to inhabit.

We have further to go to mandate that all businesses & apartment complexes recycle, make biking safer, clean up the Willamette and Columbia & more ... but it's pretty darn nice here.

Bambi

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Portland!! Posted by: mercianomad
» for Bambi Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: for Bambi Posted by: dismayed
» RE: for Bambi Posted by: Bambi
» RE: Portland!! Posted by: defiant
Chicago green? Hardly
Posted by: lido88 on Jul 27, 2007 8:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It baffles that Mayor Daley has managed to get even
close to a "green" lablel. Consider:
NO recycling program! The city just dumped its failed blue-bag program because just 13% of people participated. Citizens had to buy their own bags and they were thrown in with the rest of the garbage so no one believed that anyone at the other end was actually recycling, so why bother?
I realize recycling has its limits but one big benefit is it asks citizens to think about their consumption every day
Finally, the city is about to form a new plan but compare this to most cities in California, Colorado, Oregon, etc.
• public transportation, especially the El, badly in need of upgrade; no incentives to avoid driving to the Loop
• He promotes biking but you take your life in your hands
on most of the city street "bike lanes."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Chicago green? Hardly Posted by: defiant
and how many in the u.s.?
Posted by: naomi dagen bloom on Jul 27, 2007 8:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
those of us living in the richest country in the world need to ask questions about our poor showing here--not point fingers elsewhere. new york city where i live has tidier streets than ten years ago, but cleaner is not greener. and our asthma-inducing air quality? any american city, like nyc, that sends its garbage to other states has not even begun the work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wtf? Texas?
Posted by: kewpie on Jul 27, 2007 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't believe that Austin was on the list! When Bush was govenor he had made a mess of laws regulating polution in the air ,water and soil. Texas had lots of hazardous wastes not properly disposed of among other issues. How can a Texas city clean up their act so quickly?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: wtf? Texas? Posted by: wagadog
If Vancouver is Green, what must other places be like?
Posted by: dayahka on Jul 27, 2007 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't comment on most of the cities you mentioned, but when I see Vancouver as one of the greenest cities, I have to wonder about all the cities mentioned. Vancouver sewage doesn't remove enough of the oil, metals and human waste that it processes before pumping effluent into the ocean. 14 ton of copper a year are dumped into the Georgia Strait. The kinds of heavy metals and contaminants in Vancouver sewage will a have serious impact in 20 years or less. Victoria, BC., capital of BC and over on the island, is even worse--it just dumps all its sewage into the ocean. You can have all the lovely parks you want, but if you're poisoning the environment around you, then I'd have to say that you're a "brown" city--and hardly deserve to be among the top 15 greenest cities (in the world, of all things!). As for the other cities mentioned, I'd have to take them all with a bucket of salt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

San Francisco is TRASHED.
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Jul 27, 2007 10:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
San Francisco is TRASHED. I've been here since the 70s and it's gotten so littered, so filthy, so over-crowded, so smoggy, so full of gang grafitti, so impoverished in parts, weekly murders.
We have tens of thousands of homeless people panhandling on every street corner in many neighborhoods...and almost ever doorway on major streets downtown.
San Francisco??? What a joke!
When I moved here (from NY and LA), it was paradise. Now, I only go into the city when absolutely necessary.
I live 8 miles away. If I can avoid it, I will. All the worst of cities is right here in the city by the bay.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: San Francisco is TRASHED. Posted by: vangogh69
Vermont
Posted by: gerty954 on Jul 27, 2007 11:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was surprised Burlington, VT did not make the list...maybe it is because it is such a small place (city and state). I lived in Burlington for one year, and it appeared to me to be very green. The entire state seems to take the environment very seriously. They are given incentives to recycle, they do not allow any billboards on the few highways they have. People who live there are bikers, hikers, skiers, etc. They have very little industry so there is little pollution. They are very much into buying locally... produce and otherwise. They have very few big name stores. Even though it is a very small state, they have only one walmart in the entire state (I know, one is too many!!!). The Green Mountains and the Adirondaks are so beautiful!

However, I was SHOCKED to find out that on the NY side of Lake Champlain, there is a paper company that burns used tires for energy. VT fought (may still be fighting) them, but as far as I know they lost or are loosing the battle. This absolutely amazes me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ridiculous
Posted by: Effewe on Jul 27, 2007 1:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Simply more Greenwashing, half-truths, etc. Not enough is being done ANYWHERE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vancouver green??
Posted by: fearn on Jul 27, 2007 1:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our power is either dammed rivers or burning natural gas. Wind, solar or tidal are virtually non existent. The highways are jammed while rapid transit is over-crowded and often diesel buses. Selling cars is the main purpose of local media as the politicians advocate a major expansion of highways. The recycling programs use more energy that they recover and bottled water is everywhere because they logged in the watersheds. Growth is advocated as the cure for everything while billions are being spent for one week of games. If you think Vancouver is green then you are part of the problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Copenhagen - stil a long way to go!
Posted by: Morten on Jul 27, 2007 1:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in Copenhagen. And yes we use bikes a lot, but it's nowhere close to an eco-heaven.
We got a metro system, extremely expensive! It cut down travel time in the inner city, but it didn't help to cut down on car traffic.
Ecologically a bad investment.
If my town is supposed to be in the top, we have a long long way to come!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chicago?!?
Posted by: vangogh69 on Jul 27, 2007 2:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mean, sure there's some great architecture there but let's not get too carried away! Chicago is a filthy city with serious problems with the infrastructure, including public transportation and waste disposal/recycling issues. Surely Denver, CO could've made the list over Chitown???

Though it's a pretty car-heavy city, Kansas City, MO is pretty green with tons of parks, trees, and bike/walking trails. It's not as big as San Fran, of course, so maybe that's why it's not on this list? (And speaking of SanFran, it's a rich place yet full of dirt, filth, and squalor. While I might call it many things, including outdoor-oriented, it doesn't come to my mind as one of the greenest places.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Chicago?!? Posted by: defiant
Sydney
Posted by: deejayvee on Jul 27, 2007 7:13 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I noticed for Sydney that you linked to the City Council's claims for what they are doing. I hope the list is compiled on facts rather than just what politicians are saying.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sydney ---- Green?
Posted by: Gazza126 on Jul 28, 2007 4:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a Sydney resident, I am amazed to see the city included in a list of the word's 15 greenest cities.

As are, it seems, most of Alternet's residents in the other cities named.

Australia may be the first nation to throw out the old-fashioned lightbulb, but lets not credit Australia's biggest city with what is ultimately a federal government iniative. And while we're at it, let us also put the Green Square iniative in perspective. Its an urban redevlopment project which involves an area smaller than the city's zoo.

Meanwhile one of the world's 15 allegedly greenest cities still pumps all its sewage out to sea - largely untreated - and its public transport system is falling apart.

Judging by the feedback above... if this is the best our 15 greenest cities can do, we're in biggere trouble than we realise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sydney ---- Brown Posted by: Ames
One of these things is not like the other....
Posted by: nakhonjames on Jul 29, 2007 5:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't speak for some of the other suspiciously ungreen cities on the list, but Bangkok certainly doesn't belong here!
You can keep on writing all you want about what they plan to do with cooking oil until the day when your laptop will run on leftover spring rolls, but Bangkok, and Thai cities in general, are anything but green for one reason: AIR CONDITIONING. There hasn't been a major or minor building project that's gone up in the last 10 years that isn't completely designed to be cooled by fossil fuel powered, energy inneffcient, air-con units. The days of passive cooling are over, or more accurately, left-over for people too poor to buy air-con. Plus, every year there are more cars on the road, more and larger motorcycles, and not a bicycle to be seen anymore. Bangkok is not getting more green, it's getting less green. If you want to talk about energy efficiency, it was greener in 1980 than it is today, and it will keep getting worse until the end of oil forces a change.
And, you want to base a projection for the future on the words a Thai officials. Try taking the amount of truth in the words of our clueless leader W. Bush, and then divide by 100, and that's how much truth you'll ever get out of a Thai offcial. All that shit they talk about energy efficiency, etc. is little more than wishful thinking at best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Freiburg, Germany
Posted by: dmbfantony on Jul 29, 2007 4:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am an American living and studying in Freiburg, Germany and I was amazed to read that Freiburg was only a runner-up on this list. The hills of the Black Forest which over look Freiburg are dotted with wind mills. Solar panels can be found on many roof tops. The public transit is rather extensive and reliable. Vauban is a tranquil neighborhood where you will find bicycles to be the main form of transportation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vancouver a Grey City
Posted by: zagrrrl on Jul 29, 2007 6:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One thing Vancouverites are excellent at is self-promotion! In reality Vancouver has a pall of grey, sometimes brown pollution hanging over the city that spreads right across the Georgia Strait to Vancouver Island. This, despite not being a large manufacturing centre nor a large city. Tests reveal the waterways and sea is clogged with chemicals, oil, pollutants, fecal matter, and plastics. Special-interest groups have to fight for the protection of creeks and wetlands and for example, West Vancouver, ignores it's own bylaws about creek setbacks and water pollution. The bigger your SUV is, the better. The longer you sit in traffic jams the less-perturbed the authorities are and then approve the steep increase in the cost of public transport. People, and especially children, have many allergies and most people don't question the real reason. Other than it's beautiful green trees, Vancouver is certainly not green. That takes commitment and leadership which is sadly lacking here.
zagrrrl

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Luxembourg
Posted by: andrushka on Jul 31, 2007 3:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, Luxembourg, what about it? A lovely city and country too. Center of most European Union institutions and a most greeny place to live in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

it's not easy being green
Posted by: defiant on Jul 31, 2007 10:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think most of us fall into the trap of myopic sight. Surely this list isn't perfect, but what "green" means is that one city is a more efficient use of land and resources than another. Every city and town has "dirty" areas, and it would be a rare city which doesn't need some upgrading of infrastructure. "Green" is more than that. Los Angeles is probably the best example of non-greenness and unsustainability, in that its population and demand on resources are spread out over way too much land, and requires the import of energy and water just to function as a city. At the other end of the scale, you have cities which are more dense, less dependent on the car by design, and more efficient at using resources to support their populations, like Chicago, Portland, and others. That is what "green" means, and no city in the world is purely green. The only way to be truly green is to have a smaller population living off of the land in a completely neutral or sustainable way, with no internal compustion engines, coal plants, etc. The problem is, way too many cities all across the land are at the LA end of the efficiency scale. What's worse, even with a cute recycling programme, new busses, and a bike lane or two, they still will never be as green as the cities which were planned better from the start.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sydney is one of the top 15 green cities in the world?
Posted by: antipodean on Aug 3, 2007 11:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a Sydneysider I find the claim that Sydney is one of the top 15 green cities in the world so insane that it is laughable. Sydney's public transport system is hopeless - we have spent years trying to implement tag on tag off ticketing that I saw work perfectly throughout Korea in 2004 and in London in 2006. Five years of work on the ticketing system and they still can't make it go. And many suburban rail lines have one train an hour on weekends and the average is two trains an hour on the weekends.

That's if you live anywhere near a rail line, cause the only serious rail line built in the last 25 years was the eastern suburbs line (the airport line doesn't count - you avoid it as much as you can cause $15-20 for a return ticket to the city from 5 k away is a major rip off). The state government keep promising new rail lines but they never build them. We get more tollways - lots and lots of them - but no transit at all. And Sydney's trains are famed for being unreliable also....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]