Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Wind: The Farmer's New Cash Crop

By Joseph D'Agnese, E Magazine. Posted June 23, 2007.


How a small farm town traded its dairy cows for renewable energy.
Advertisement

In the spring of 1999 a stranger named Bill Moore arrived in the small town of Lowville, the county seat of Lewis County, New York, and checked into the Ridge View Motor Lodge on Route 12. Like many towns in this county, Lowville (the "Low" rhymes with "now") is blanketed with countless parcels of farmland and pastureland that are whipped, especially in winter, by powerful winds gusting out of Canada, 60 miles to the north.

This is dairy country, though the constant pressure for cheap milk has made the economics too chancy for single-family dairies. Moore, a broad-shouldered Yale man who had worked on Wall Street, had a passion for renewable energy and owned a company, Atlantic Renewable, that had already developed two wind farms -- one with seven turbines and the other with 20 -- 75 miles south of town. He had what he considered a good proposal for the 27,000 citizens of Lewis County: Milk wind, not cows.

When he started telling the locals about his notion, Moore was met with indulgent smiles but little genuine enthusiasm. "I made a presentation at a town meeting, and they looked at me like I was from Mars," he says. "They were polite. They didn't openly laugh."

Next, he wandered the countryside, knocking on farmhouse doors to ask permission to erect meteorological equipment to test the wind speed. "I was thrown out by a number of people," he says. "They've listened to a lot of sales pitches over the years: seed salesmen, fertilizer salesmen." As he'd learned over the years, farmers were a tough crowd to win over.

Eight years later, though, it's as if the cool reception Moore received never happened at all. Windmills stud the flat, stark landscape as far as the eye can see. Each turbine is taller than the Statue of Liberty, and nearly all of them are spinning inexorably toward the future of Lewis County -- and perhaps our own.

This is the Maple Ridge Wind Farm, the nation's largest new alternative energy project east of the Mississippi River. In the last year or so, 195 turbines have become operational in the towns of Lowville, Harrisburg, and Martinsburg, capable of producing 320 megawatts of electricity, the amount generated by a medium-size power plant, or enough power to run 98,000 homes.

What lured Moore and kept him commuting between Lowville (pop. 4,548) and his home in Maryland was the knowledge that this part of Lewis County was uniquely qualified to become the East Coast's largest wind farm. From the back of the motor lodge, he could see the land rising to a kind of rocky ridge.

This is the Tug Hill Plateau, which has stood up to harsh Canadian air skating off Lake Ontario as long as there has been wind, stone, and soil. The plateau, about 600 feet higher than the surrounding countryside, sits west of the Adirondack Mountains in farm country. The Irish, German, and Polish immigrants who settled here a century ago did so because the land was cheap, and they soon learned why. The plateau is colder than the surrounding lowlands, and the growing season two weeks shorter. A few hundred feet above the plateau, wind speeds of 100 miles per hour are not unknown.

You wouldn't know it from the oversize fiberglass cow that stands optimistically beside the local farm co-op store, but the milking industry here is in decline. There are a few employers in the area -- factories that make Kraft Philadelphia-brand cream cheese, bowling pins, gift boxes, and book covers -- but they hardly provide work for everyone. The sons and daughters of the dairy farmers are leaving in droves for jobs elsewhere. The scenery has fallen into something resembling an Andrew Wyeth painting: Collapsed silos, dilapidated barns, and abandoned farmhouses are everywhere.

Moore felt strongly that his offer could bring new jobs, stabilize tax revenues, and elevate the quality of local schools, but to make it happen he would have to persuade more than 78 landowners to let him collect his data by erecting giant turbines on their land. He had to help the citizens of Tug Hill fall in love with wind.

Moore, a 59-year-old dairy farmer named Bill Burke belongs to the fifth generation of Burkes born on Tug Hill. He and his wife, Patricia, live in an Italianate-seeming white house with black shutters that is perched on the edge of the plateau, with wind turbines to the front and back. He's raised and milked cows on his 598 acres for more than 36 years and was just getting around to formulating his "exit strategy": Sell off 200 head of cattle, sell off equipment, sell off land, and settle down to a retirement blissfully free of debt.

"I don't know if you know what it's like for us farmers," he says, "but most of us are in debt from the moment we start up in business. I bought out three farmers when I got started, and now there's no one left to replace me." He wouldn't go out of his way to encourage his son or daughter to follow in his footsteps: "No money in it." Maybe, he thought, he'd substitute-teach at the school where his wife was principal. Or maybe he'd sell seed or feed.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: wind

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Economics may be the saving of the family farm
Posted by: djnoll on Jun 23, 2007 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As was pointed out early in the article is that many of the farmers who have converted to wind farming are now leasing out their land for food production. While the dairy farmer may sell off a herd, they do not have to do so. Those who rent the land are going in to food production because it is easier than trying to do industrial size grain production. While it is important that these projects continue to grow for energy reasons, it looks like it may have the side benefit of creating sustainability of safe, local food production as well. It will be interesting to see how this evolves since it may offer a sane approach to solving two problems at once.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here, too
Posted by: henderson on Jun 23, 2007 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our greedy county board wants them, too. This is a heavily-populated farming county that only rates a "2" on a scale of 1-10 for consistent wind power, but our county is willing to sell us out; short-term profit for long-term misery. And the county board has concluded that they can be erected ONLY 500 FEET FROM A DWELLING!!!

"Health, hazard, and quality of life near wind power installations How Close is Too Close?
Nina Pierpont, MD, PhD*
March 1, 2005
A nacelle (generator and gearbox) weighing up to 60 tons atop a 265 ft. metal tower, equipped with 135 ft. blades, is a significant hazard to people, livestock, buildings, and traffic within a radius equal to the height of the structure (400 ft) and beyond. In Germany in 2003, in high storm winds, the brakes on a wind turbine failed and the blades spun out of control. A blade struck the tower and the entire nacelle flew off the tower. The blades and other parts landed as far as 1650 ft (0.31 mile) from the base of the tower (Note that all turbines discussed in this article are "upwind," three-bladed, industrial-sized turbines. "Downwind" turbines have not been built since the 1980's.) Given the date, this turbine was probably smaller than the ones proposed for current construction, and thus could not throw pieces as far. This distance is nearly identical to calculations of ice throw from turbines with 100 ft blades rotating 20 times per minute (1680 ft)"

And the above is only the so-called tip of the iceberg. If interested, just google "dangers of wind turbines" - there's plenty of sites to choose from to learn about the dangers. The noise alone is inescapable - like water torture.

I watched the 3 YouTube films, "Voices of Tug Hill", and it's appalling. Greed has no boundaries, no conscience, no morals, no standards......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Resistance is futile Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: Here, too Posted by: Deep
The best place for wind farms.
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 23, 2007 11:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We should put wind farms along our southern border -- to take advantage of that big sucking sound Ross Perot warned us about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do you suppose Edison heard a lot of complaints about stringing his wires overhead everywhere?
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 23, 2007 11:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I imagine such as "They block our view of the sky." Or how about "The electrical current will warp your brain"?

We have a future as a species only because we can adapt. Yes, we need to be careful about what we adapt to; like lobsters in the pot we can get boiled alive. But I thought that's what renewables are trying to prevent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sea4th
Posted by: sea4th on Jun 23, 2007 11:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The end to the Oil Age will require the re-localization of
everything from food to education to energy. And the sooner
we start to realize this, the less impact it will have on
the generation that experiences these changes.

Thinking in global terms and acting on local issues will ensure
that mankind will survive despite this present age of waste and greed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real problem with wind: disruption of coal and gas markets!
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 24, 2007 9:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is why you see the astroturf, "grassroots" anti-wind organizations forming under the guidance of secretive PR firms funded by the coal and gas lobby.

The first fact of the matter is that we could see large losses in the percentage of US electricity generated by coal and natural gas due to the widespread adoption of wind and solar.

The second fact is that the main market for coal and gas in the United States is in electricity generation - and the same funds and banks that own the major electric utilities in the US also own the major coal and gas corporations, who rely on sales to the electric utilities for a large share of their profits.

Thus, if an electric utility invests heavily in clean renewable energy, it may be good for the customers of the utility, and for the environmental health of the local community, but it will probably hurt the financial interests of the banks and hedge funds that control the electric utilities. See Electric Utilities, for example.

The monopolistic and anti-competetive arrangements in the major energy sectors are the primary reason why we're not getting all our energy from renewable sources - the fundamental problem being that one can't measure and sell the sun or the wind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kwatt
Posted by: Kwatt on Jun 24, 2007 9:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My objection to wind farms has nothing to do with birds, bats, noise or esthetics. The main problem is they are being oversold to a gullible public in areas of little to no chance of ever reaping the benefit everyone wants… reliable, clean and cheap electricity. For sure, there are areas where wind power is competitive but Lewis County is not one of them. A quick look at a wind resource map of Lewis County is revealing [see http://www.bergey.com/wind_maps.htm ]. An area rating of 2 completely confirms that these so-called wind farms are only there to farm the subsidies. The “farmers” and developers will reap huge profits and the public will get mostly hot air for their hard earned money. And just once I would like to see wind data truthfully portrayed. For starters, you should do yourselves a favor and learn the difference between electric energy in kilowatt-hours and electric power (the time rate of making electricity) in kilowatts. And then get a cheap calculator and do the math. A modest home will use around 1,000 kilowatt-hours of electric energy per month or 12,000 kilowatt-hours per year. A more average sized home will consume around 20% more or 14,400 kw-hrs per year. So how is it that 320 megawatts in wind capacity is “enough” for 98,000 homes? Let’s see, 320 megawatts is 320,000 kilowatts. Take that times 24 hours a day for 365 days and then multiply by 0.25, the typical capacity factor for wind turbines (meaning they only produce at their rated capacity 25% of the time in a good area [see http://wprs.ucdavis.edu/index.html , click on capacity factor]) and we arrive at a little over 700 million kilowatt-hours per year. Now compare that to the needs of 98,000 small homes, or 98,000 times 12,000. That comes to 1.176 Billion kilowatt-hours per year. Mmmmm... could be that somebody is telling a big one! One final point: however large capacity may be, it is useless if it is idle. Area 2 wind resources are known to be seasonal, in which the wind may not blow for days on end and in alternate seasons the wind blows too hard (in excess of 55 mph), in which case, the turbines must be shut down to prevent damage. Apparently the wind industry's standards for truth in advertising are non-existent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Kwatt Posted by: Logic's Edge
» RE: Kwatt Posted by: Kwatt
Airborne turbines
Posted by: Logic's Edge on Jun 24, 2007 10:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find this approach to be more appealing than the huge ground-based turbines. One advantage is that the wind is nearly constant at higher altitudes.

Magenn Power

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Airborne turbines Posted by: Hairog
Place them off shore and spead them out.
Posted by: Hairog on Jun 25, 2007 12:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The force of the wind is multiplied when traveling over water. Fill the middle of the Great Lakes to power Chicago, Milwaukee, Duluth, Toranto, Cleveland etc. Place them off shore just out of sight in the gulf, atlantic coast and pacific coast. This should take care of most coastal cities. Use solar where appropriate.

The key is that it must be distributed power generation both in terms of physical placement and especially in terms of reward.

No mega corporations controling the whole thing. Spead energy production out by using different methods is my advice and all countries should be in control of their own production from start to finish.

The only thing that should be trasported should be raw materials and blue prints. Everything else from construction laybor to day to day operations shoud be in the hands of local companies not multi-national corporations. Local companies, using local laybor producting energy in their own back yard that is the key.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Truth in advertising, anyone?
Posted by: Mike McGrady on Jul 10, 2007 7:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article takes at face value the "numbers" supplied by industrial wind operators, and it is these numbers by which wind is sold to the host communities and to the politicans who continue to subsidize wind farms.

For example, the Tug Hill farm (or should I use the swell-sounding "Maple Ridge Wind Park" moniker?) supposedly supplies 320 megawatts of electricity. This is, of course, the "nameplate" capacity advertised by the wind company, meaning that is how much the whole farm is CAPABLE of producing IF the wind is blowing at optimal speed at all times. But we know the wind doesn't blow all the time, and therefore this capacity is greatly lessened by that fact. By how much? Well, in its most recent forcast report, the New York State Independent System Operator--the ISO, the entity that operates the grid--only figures on 30 percent of that capacity from Tug Hill during the winter months, and only 10 percent (!) during the summer months (coincidentally, the 6 months we need the power the most!). Back of the envelope figuring brings that nameplate capacity down to 193 megawatts (I'll supply the math if anyone's interested--it comes to 60 percent of nameplate, and even this is being generous). This number is further reduced by the industry wide notion that at any given time, 10 percent of the turbines are down at any given time for maintenance (not 9 or 10 turbines, as the article states--more like 19 or 20). So we have a wind company allowed to "sell" it's farm on the notion of providing 40 percent more electricity than the ISO counts on.

Furthermore, the wind companies LOVE to state how many homes can be served with their wind farm ("enough power to serve X number of upstate homes!"). Well, in the first place, the advertised 98,000 homes served by Tug Hill (according to the article/wind company) is actually reduced to only 58,800 homes when the ISO accepted capacity is applied. But the real kicker is this: According to the minutes of the November 2005 meeting of the New York State Power Authority, nearly 100 percent of Horizon's power share of Tug Hill (about 100 turbines worth) is purchased by the NYS Power Authority and then sold to downstate concerns--particularly the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and the City University of New York. So, how many homes served? Zero. Zilch. Nada.

So when reading articles about wind farming, please be aware that you're being sold a bill of goods from the get-go.

More later.

Mike McGrady

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]