Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Colony Collapse: Do Massive Bee Die-Offs Mean an End to Our Food System as We Know it?

By Scott Thill, AlterNet. Posted June 11, 2007.


It may sound like urban legend but it's not. A frightening trend of bee colony collapses could lead to everything from a radically transformed diet to an overall wipeout of the world's food supply.
Advertisement

The joke may have fallen flat, but this time no one could blame Bill Maher. Sure, it happened on the May 4, 2007 installment of his show Real Time With Bill Maher, but CNN personality and senior medical correspondent Sanjay Gupta was the one delivering the punch line, and it seems he was the only one in the room who believed the issue of Earth's mysteriously vanishing honeybees was a joke. And while some may argue that he stayed on message, promoting his May 19 documentary called Danger: Poison Food, he nevertheless fumbled for answers when Maher asked him about what could be killing a major component of the nation's food supply.

"Gosh, I don't know," Gupta answered, searching for context. "The -- you know, with regards to bees in particular, I'm not sure what's killing the bees. I'm not sure what's killing the birds or the bees."

Cue the laugh track.

In Gupta's defense, a few weeks or months ago, the increasing disappearance of the honeybees, known now by the technical term Colony Collapse Disorder, had that feel of an urban legend, a phenomenon so esoteric and strange that it sounded like something out of science fiction. Except it's not: It's a frightening trend that, according to those hard at work at solving the problem at universities and organizations worldwide, could lead to everything from a radically transformed diet to an overall wipeout of the world's food supply.

"It is real," argued Dewey M. Caron, professor of entomology at the University of Delaware and one of several authorities investigating the issue with the Mid-Atlantic Apiculture Research and Extension Consortium's Colony Collapse Disorder Working Group (MAAREC). "We surveyed a few states and figured out that half to three-fourths of a million bee colonies have died. This is no urban legend. It is serious."

What is so serious is not only that the bees themselves are dying off without a smoking gun present, but that most people have no idea of the role they play in the food supply at large. Commercial beehives pollinate over a third of America's crops, and that web of nourishment encompasses everything from fruits like peaches, apples, cherries, strawberries and more, to nuts like California almonds, 90 percent of which are helped along by the honeybees. Without this annual pollination, you could conceivably kiss those crops goodbye, to say nothing of the honey bees produce or the flowers they also fertilize.

But as the world has grown, so has its hunger and crowds, which has paved the way for the death of wild pollinators as well as the importation of honeybees from different climates in order to have massive crop pollination.

In the case of California's aforementioned almonds, the largest managed pollination event in the world, the growing season occurs in February, well before local hives have suitably increased their populations to handle the pollination load. As a result, the region is increasingly dependent on the importation of hives from warmer climates.

The same goes for apple crops in New York, Washington and Michigan, as well as blueberries in Maine. Almonds alone require more than one-third of all the managed honeybees in the United States, so it's entirely possible that the honeybees may have already been stretched to the breaking point, as far as environmental and chemical stressors are concerned. In fact, it's safe to say that the nation's honeybees, already a tireless lot, are totally exhausted from work.

"The honeybee is so important for pollination of hundreds of agricultural crops, because humans have made it so," Caron explained. "We destroyed the natural pollinators, plowed up the area they needed to live and continued to replace their habitats with strip malls and housing developments. So, farmers have come to rely on honeybees because of mushrooming human populations and our own destructive habits to the natural ecology."

And not just here, either: The disappearance is under way across the world. Regions of Iran are experiencing the same phenomenon, as are countries like Poland, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, Germany and more every day, including Latin American and Asia. The breadth of the problem suggests that a major environmental balance could be to blame -- what else is new? -- yet no authority will sign off on the possibility and the specific causes still remain unknown.

"Other countries are also experiencing serious declines of honeybee colonies," said Maryann Frazier, senior extension associate at MAAREC and the department of entomology at Penn State University. "But we are not certain that the cause behind the losses here in the United States are the same as those causing [losses] in other parts of the world."

Throw in the fact that this type of thing has been recorded as a regular occurrence since the 19th century, and you have an apiary mystery of mammoth proportions.

"Bee colonies die all the time," Caron added. "They die over winter, lose queens, are destroyed by pests or diseases. But this is different, as the bees are simply gone and do not develop normally."

"We have had honeybee die-offs in the past which may or may not be related to the current situation," said Frazer. "However, they seem to be getting more severe. If the problem of honeybee health isn't addressed quickly, there could be serious consequences."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: food supply, bees

Scott Thill runs the online mag Morphizm.com. His writing has appeared on Salon, XLR8R, All Music Guide, Wired and others.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I like that this article isn't fear mongering
Posted by: ateo on Jun 11, 2007 12:33 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I looked into this topic after someone on the comments here said something to the effect that, "the bees are dying and humanity will die shortly after."

As stated it is only the European Honey Bee that is dying off and it is not the only pollinator in nature by any means. There are native pollinators that could be introduced back into their natural environment.

What's killing them off? The most plausible answer I've heard is cell phone signals. We humans assume that because we cannot perceive signals, sounds, energy with our limited senses that no other animal can. Well, we are likely to be wrong in that assumption. See: whales reacting to the U.S. Navy's hyper sonar and the bees, despite being provided an environment so friendly it is zoo like, dying off. Cell phone signals have come to blanket the entire United States in the past decade, they're piercing every one of your bodies as you read this, and mine as I write it. Of course that doesn't rule out other theories.

So humanity is not doomed after all if the bees die off, but it might be a strong indication that we are headed in that direction.

Well, we had a good run but committed collective suicide by destroying the only known environment within the universe that can sustain us. C'est la vie, hopefully the Earth can recover and try again with another sentient race.

Here's a quote I read today that is somewhat relevant to transporting bee colonies across the country to pollinate crops:

"Yet hear me, friends! we have now to deal with another people, small and feeble when our forefathers first met with them, but now great and overbearing. Strangely enough, they have a mind to till the soil, and the love of possessions is a disease in them. These people have made many rules that the rich may break, but the poor may not! They have a religion in which the poor worship, but the rich will not! They even take tithes of the poor and weak to support the rich and those who rule. They claim this mother of ours, the Earth, for their own use, and fence their neighbors away from her, and deface her with their buildings and their refuse. They compel her to produce out of season, and when sterile she is made to take medicine in order to produce again. All this is sacrilege."

-Sitting Bull, 1856

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Cell Phone Signals? Posted by: Monitor523
» kill a phone, save a bee. Posted by: kellysgarden
The answer is "Yes". Isn't it?
Posted by: Obijuan on Jun 11, 2007 12:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am still left with questions. I was a bit disappointed in the article as this story is months old now. I don't see a whole lot of new information here. By now, we must be able to estimate the losses, and whether these losses will be significant or not to the country and world as a whole.

Based on current estimates, what are the expectations for crop loss this year? Pollination times for many crops have already passed. If the bees weren't available, time's up. How many farms/orchards didn't (or won't) get their bees?

I heard most of this back in March and April. The real information has still not be released. Anyone for playing the futures market?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The answer is "Yes". Isn't it? Posted by: kellysgarden
It's a new parasite: Nosema ceranae
Posted by: igancedo on Jun 11, 2007 1:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Spanish scientists found out that it is a parasite, called Nosema ceranae

American scientists seem to be of the same opinion. See UCSF scientist tracks down suspect in honeybee deaths in the San Francisco Chronicle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not so fast... Posted by: snedunuri
Oh, please.
Posted by: Annarisse on Jun 11, 2007 3:35 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As any gardener knows, there are plenty of other ways to pollinate plants so as to produce a crop. If the bees are gone and the fruit trees really aren't getting what they need from other animals, you could send pickers up into the trees during blossom time with q-tips to do it by hand. It's common for fertilization of squash plants to happen by hand, because they all look very much alike and cross-pollination might produce less desirable fruit.

The loss of honeybees is a bad thing - for the honey industry. It may make farming more labour-intensive. But kill off the crops? Only if the farmer is unaware of basic botanical techniques, or unable/unwilling to use them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Size matters Posted by: Swatopluk
» RE: Oh, please. Posted by: RGD-5
Where have all the bees gone?
Posted by: peterlborst on Jun 11, 2007 4:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recent "news" articles on bee disappearance contain many of the oft repeated glaring errors. I have selected a few of them for comment.

* "Albert Einstein is believed to have warned If the bee disappears from the surface of the Earth, man would have no more than four years to live."

Most people following this topic realize by now Einstein never said anything about bees. This has been checked out with the Einstein archives in Israel. It isn't true, anyway. Mankind's fate is not that inextricably linked to bees.

* "No more bees, no more pollination, no more plants."

Without bee pollinated food, there would still be plenty to eat. Most food crops are wind pollinated. Many fruits are self-pollinating.

* "In the US, beekeepers in California, Florida and Texas have experienced the greatest losses – up to 90 percent of their bees."

While some beekeepers may have lost 80 or 90 percent of their bees, the estimate total loss (Apiary Inspectors of America).

* "A German study out of Landau University provides preliminary evidence that radiation from cellular phones interferes with bees' navigation systems."

Even the German scientist whose work on telephones was cited denies a plausible link between cell towers and bee die off. "What they put in the colony was a cordless phone. Whoever translated the story didn't know the difference." – Dr. May Berenbaum

* "Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) may weaken bees"

This statement is so weak that it is virtually meaningless, but Bt has been used around bees for decades with no apparent harm.

* "No one in the organic beekeeping world is reporting colony collapse"

The fact that "no one is reporting it" certainly doesn't prove a thing! No one is certain what this disorder is, so it's an easy thing to say "I don't have it", especially when the so-called "organic beekeepers" are trying to make a case against pesticides.

* "Managed honeybees will cease to exist by 2035"

This completely ignores the fact that it is only the European honeybee that is suffering. Asian honeybees are not affected, nor are African honeybees, both those in Africa and the ones that now predominate in most of the Americas, including the southern USA.

* "Currently, though, intensive farming practices exploit the honeybee."

Honeybees are "exploited" for pollination because they are the most suitable for this purpose. Only the honeybee colony can provide the vast quantities of bees needed to pollinate large acreages of crops. They were moved up and down the Nile to take advantage of seasonal changes. Is it "exploitative" to raise plants and animals for food?

* "It's real efficient, real inexpensive and it works."

Honeybee pollination is hardly cheap. A hive of bees can rent for up to $150 US dollars for a few weeks and the grower may need hundreds of these. They have to be trucked in and out, moved a half dozen times a year or more for distances of up to 1000 miles or more each way. This all takes expensive gas, vehicles and labor.

* "And despite evidence of their efficacy as crop pollinators, wild species are not being exploited to any significant extent."

Wild pollinators are simply not up to the job. Never have been. That's why honeybees are brought in to pollinate.

* "What you can do about CCD. Support the organic industry and purchase organic foods. This helps to eliminate hazardous pesticides, genetically modified organisms and factory farming techniques"

Nobody has proved that any of these things cause CCD. Organic farming is a very small force and has virtually no affect on large scale agriculture, which is responsible for actually feeding most of the world's people.

pb

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Where have all the bees gone? Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Many guesses, little proof Posted by: Techubus
» RE: Where have all the bees gone? Posted by: deaudonnee
GMF anyone?
Posted by: Sushi on Jun 11, 2007 4:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have to wonder if the bee die-off could have anything to do with the genetically modified crops. One wouldn't think so, being that humans have been modifying plants the old-fashioned way by selective breeding crops, but the old ways were gradual. Just perhaps the new pollens produced are adding something (or lacking something) that is altering the bee DNA in a bad way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: GMF anyone? Posted by: famouspipeliner
» RE: GMF anyone? Posted by: beeden
» RE: GMF anyone? Posted by: grn1
» RE: GMF anyone? Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: GMF anyone? Posted by: Gisele
» RE: GMO's? Any recent info on Killer bees? Posted by: common intelligence
» RE: GMO's? Any recent info on Killer bees? Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Who cares?
Posted by: jimidee on Jun 11, 2007 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At least my grandchildren aren't getting bee stings on their feet when they run around in the clover in our yard bare footed, like our children and us old duffers used to get.

But seriously, I haven't seen a wild honey bee on our farm for YEARS! There used to be millions of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And you don't worry..... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: And you don't worry..... Posted by: PopRox80
» Interesting.... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» And there is also... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: And there is also... Posted by: PopRox80
» RE: And you don't worry..... Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: And you don't worry..... Posted by: jimidee
read more about bees here
Posted by: clvngodess on Jun 11, 2007 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.organicconsumers.org/bees.cfm

There's quite a bit of information at the above link. Yeah, it's on an organic foods website, but the references are credible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

from a farmer
Posted by: zooeyhall on Jun 11, 2007 8:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I farm in eastern Nebraska. Bees have virtually vanished from my area.

I have alfalfa fields and in the summer when they bloomed, the sound of the bees busily at work collecting nectar from the blue alfalfa flowers was everywhere.

My alfalfa fields are flowering right now, and I can walk through the entire field and not see a single bee.

There is clearly something happening from what was 20 years ago.

I am disappointed that so many of the previous posts are dismissive or have a "so what?" attitude about this. The disappearance of honeybees is a very grave indication of something wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: from a farmer Posted by: grn1
» RE: from a farmer Posted by: PopRox80
» RE: from a farmer Posted by: grn1
» Howdy Neighbor - Posted by: RoffleTheWaffle
» RE: from a farmer Posted by: grn1
» RE: from a farmer Posted by: zooeyhall
» RE: from a farmer Posted by: grn1
» RE: from a farmer Posted by: brainworms
» RE: from a farmer Posted by: RoffleTheWaffle
I believe...
Posted by: Bbear41 on Jun 11, 2007 9:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...That cereal crops are wind pollinated, so we are not facing mass starvation. The loss of fruit and nut crops might lead to defficency diseases. The honey bees might be (to over use a figure of speach) the canary in the coal mine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Non-Native Species - European HoneyBee
Posted by: mdwoade on Jun 11, 2007 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The honeybee is not a native North American species. It was introduced by our European ancestors to help pollinate the non-native fruit trees that the settlers brought with them from the Old World. Before there were honeybees in America, there were plenty of fruits and vegetables and nuts, and there were plenty of pollinators. Imported species include kudzu, walking catfish, zebra mussels, parrots, and so on. Now, in general, honeybees seem to be a good thing, but let's not get all teary-eyed about a species that has only been in America for a few hundred years. Potatoes were brought from the New World to Europe and look how that turned out for the Irish!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Epidemiology and increased pesticide use - and climate change
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 11, 2007 10:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In any case of understanding why a disease is spreading or an event like this is occuring, multiple factors need to be taken into account. Unfortunately, the level of science education in the USA is so low that people have a hard time sorting out conflicting claims.

One of the main issues is that pesticide use has not tapered off, but has been steadily rising. The worst pesticides have been banned, but agricultural areas are still flooded with pesticides that kill of every insect and harm human health as well. It's not just bees - for example, there is a correlation between human neural damage (Parkinsons, etc.) and pesticide use in rural areas.

Why aren't there more studies on this? Because the US university system has been taken over by corporate interests who don't want to see studies of industrial and agricultural and pharmaceutical chemical toxicity - for the simple reason that such studies would provide the basis for multiple lawsuits against these corporations and their shareholders.

Another factor in disease transmission is overcrowding - this played a primary role in the 1918 flu epidemic, when soldiers were being shipped all around the world and housed in crowded conditions, and when hygiene was much poorer than it is now. Corporate beekeepers run their colonies like factory farms, and the same problems arise in chicken, pig and cow factories - which is why they use so many antibiotics, which contributes to the rise of antibiotic-resistant human pathogens.

Another issue in the spread of diseases is global warming - West Nile Virus being the best example. As climates change, some areas get wetter and warmer and some dry out - and this means that new pests can be introduced, and that many creatures are under stress and more susceptible to disease. Under severe climate change (on the horizon, and already starting to happen) this problem will only worsen.

Pesticides, overcrowding and climate change are the most likely culprits - but the Good Germans in our current corrupt academic system generally know what topics to avoid if they want to get tenure (there are a few exceptions, as always).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ORGANIC BEES AREN'T DYING!
Posted by: nc green on Jun 11, 2007 10:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recently posted on a blog for organic bee farmers, the fact that out of 1,000 or so organic bee farmers (those who don't spray for mites) who correspond with the blogger, not one has lost a colony.

Another interesting tidbit, that the organic bee farmers who use natural-sized hives don't have mites. Those with mites were those using commercial hives that try to maximize occupancy by squeezing bees into smaller holes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Flys pollinate way more than bees
Posted by: tclaverdure on Jun 11, 2007 10:52 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Science has shown that the lowly house fly is a more prolific pollinater than bees. So we just need to take a shit in the fields and attract some flys. No kidding.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bees are more effective pollinators Posted by: Desert Ravengrrrl
"Organic" bees
Posted by: helenwheels on Jun 11, 2007 11:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The other day I read a bit of an article that claims that organic bees are not dying, just others. I only read the beginning of the article (dammit) so I don't even know what makes a bee "organic" other than its environment. But if that's the case, problem solved, eh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Organic" bees Posted by: helenwheels
Could be a natural cycle
Posted by: tclaverdure on Jun 11, 2007 11:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also this could be a natural cycle. Growing up in saskatchewan on the prairies I remember there being a wide range of bugs depending on the year. Sometimes lots of beetles or locusts or bees or mosquitoes or whatever. Some years not many.

I now live in Calgary Alberta and we have lots of bees around my house, and wasps and yellow jackets and mosquitoes. lots of rain the last few years compared to previous years.

Do we really know the whole picture?? It could take years to figure out why not so many bees. Probably its the commercial farming that tries to make a big profit in the smallest time with the least amount of effort etc.

Who knows? Next year we could be saying there are too many bees. We could encourage natural bee populations around farms by mixing crops with forests or some other permaculture type strategy.

What kind of throws me off is the sensationalism of the title of this piece. It sounds so Jehovah Witness end time bullshit like. Run the sky is falling, kiss your ass good bye its the rapture the bees are gone and the last WW1 veteren is dead.

People in the west eat crap food like kraft dinner most of the time anyway, and people who want fruit will encourage local organic growers by paying more for the life giving nutrients inherent in good food and the cheeze whiz eaters will get there oreos one way or another.

We need family planning on this planet big time. 7 Billion within a few years. 10-12 Billion in who knows how long? Now that is a problem even a bee surplus CANNOT feed.

The Pope is a Dope. Use condoms you horny humans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Farmer - question
Posted by: billwald on Jun 11, 2007 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bees have been around longer than humans and do OK on their own. Why is it necessary to have bee keepers truck them between orchards? Why not put a bee hive in every orchard and then ignore the hives? Will not the bees take care of themselves?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Farmer - question Posted by: LRayn
» RE: Farmer - question Posted by: mdwoade
The Indy's special climate change issue
Posted by: BBaumer on Jun 11, 2007 11:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Indypendent, Indymedia NYC's newspaper, just released its climate change issue. You can read news that "No One Else Will Say" at www.indypendent.org

You can post comments on any of the stories that directly relate to global climate change, the problem and what we can do about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wild pollinators also dying
Posted by: LRayn on Jun 11, 2007 11:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Native bee species and other wild pollinators are also dying. See the book "The Forgotten Pollinators" by Stephen L. Buchmann and Gary Paul Nabhan for details.

I am shocked by the many comments of unconcern expressed here. The idea that we can just hand pollinate every single crop flower across millions of acres of farmland is ridiculous. Go ask a worker at a seed bank like Native Seeds/SEARCH in Arizona about how labor-intensive hand pollination is, and you will get a more realistic view of how devastating the pollinator die-off really is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wild pollinators also dying Posted by: zooeyhall
Here's another hypothosis GMO's and IF & UV's
Posted by: common intelligence on Jun 11, 2007 12:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is only a stab at causes but worth investigating.
The vast amount of genetically modified foods that have been imposed on the world at large was done so with out consent of the MAsses of people only by companies like Monsanto. They where all warned that we do not understand enough to play with mother nature but they all insisted it was all OK. You know Bee make honey and the process they use is uniqlly theirs. It is a food too for them. It's just an idea but those GMOs could possibly have some causal effect on their propagation.

Then too, on another note. I myself, physically feel the suns radiation/heat more intensly than any time in my life. Has there been any information collected as to the intesity of UV and infra red radiation over time? As to if it is increasing?
This too I've not heard any information on.

I'm just putting this out there in hopes that it might be addressed.
Good luck earthlings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bee Die-off May be Due to H.A.A.R.P.
Posted by: morrison on Jun 11, 2007 1:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or High Frequency Active Aural Research Project and other clandestine weather modification projects that have been playing havoc with our weather and exacerbating global climate change (so says n.a.s.a.). The radio waves that are emmitted from haarp (check it out via your search engine) may very well be behind this nightmare and other alterations in the basic systems necessary for survival. through the use of this transmitter we have altered the very consistency and content of our atmosphere. this is real, has been around since during clinton and is being used more and more with the present killers in the white house. they are bent on taking us to armeggedon and this is just one of the toys they have at their disposal as well as the massive aerosol spraying that has been done to facilitate this program.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

peacefull1
Posted by: joshuawelch on Jun 11, 2007 1:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw a report from Organic Consumers Association (OCA) that claimed that "colony collapse" is not happening to organic bee colonies where toxic products are not used.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: peacefull1 Posted by: sunspot
» RE: peacefull1 Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Worried Over Wrong Things
Posted by: Gravitas on Jun 11, 2007 3:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with those who feel many of the above posts have been cavalier about this threat. I think Americans have a sense of invulnerability even after 911 and Katrina. We just can't conceive our cushy lifestyles might not go on forever. We have worried about ridiculous things!!! Not only the mindless t.v. shows the author mentioned, but we are a nation of hypochondriacs worrying about eaking out every last millisecond. I find it mind boggling that surgeon general Carmona is harping that obesity is one of the biggest killers of all time, when in a few short years we will be facing food shortages from peak oil and global warming. (Not so mind boggling when you consider pharmaceutical backed giant Robert Woods Johnson Foundation is buying off politicians left and right. Hillary seems to be on the bandwagon too!) I wonder what is is going to take for us to wake up and realize we are in serious collective trouble. Or maybe we never will. Maybe those with their heads in the sands will mercifully be destroyed without ever realizing it was coming. Too bad for the rest of us who have to stand by and watch with full consciousness!!!!!

"Weight obsession is a social disease. If we cared more about CO2 than BMI there would still be time."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» How do you define "wrong"? Posted by: nellie blogger
Messing with Bees' minds
Posted by: fanny666 on Jun 11, 2007 3:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dya suppose that when a bee finds big wooden boxes surrounded by exotic, non-native, delicious flowers, he might want to build a hive right there on the big wooden box?

Dya suppose it might mess with his mind and disorient him when, after he heads out to get supplies, he comes back and finds the nest has been knocked down or sprayed with chemicals?

Hey suburbia: if you want the flowers, stop knocking down bee hives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ignorance or stupidity, which is it?
Posted by: rancespergl on Jun 11, 2007 3:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People on ladders with q-tips.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pesticides
Posted by: snowhound on Jun 11, 2007 3:43 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pesticides and GMO crops have a lot to do with the suppression of the honeybees immune system. It leaves them open for many diseases that in the past they would overcome. They are not much different than us humans. Eventually all the toxins we absorb break down our immune systems and leave us vulnerable to disease.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Has it occured to anyone that the world is.
Posted by: eosrk on Jun 11, 2007 4:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.not only becoming warmer and ice caps melting, but also more desert is being made on all the contients!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Leave it to the Neo-cons/Neo-fascists
Posted by: halg on Jun 11, 2007 6:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Same thing either way. They refuse to acknowledge the damage they are doing to this planet. I am tired of their never-ending whine about how this is not a perfect world. No, it isn't a perfect world, but it is the ONLY world we have. Let's take care of it. First step: Eradicate neoconservatism and neofascism. second step: Live in peace.

No it is not simple. But that is the only answer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What causes CCD? Part One
Posted by: chlamor on Jun 11, 2007 6:35 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "cause" of CCD is under investigation. To be sure, the hysteria
surrounding CCD has outpaced the science. Beekeepers and investigators have
suggested varroa, inadequate rainfall, proximity to power lines, colony
treatments, moving stresses, genetically modified crops, lack of genetic
diversity, inadequate nutrition and chemicals present in the environment,
just to name a few, as possible causes of CCD. At this point, almost every
conceivable and realistic cause remains a possibility. The leading
candidates and a brief explanation of their potential role are listed below.



1. *Traditional bee pests and diseases (including American foulbrood,
European foulbrood, chalkbrood, nosema, small hive beetles, and tracheal
mites):* These bee maladies likely are not responsible for CCD because
they do not have a history of causing CCD-like symptoms. That said,
traditional bee pests and diseases may exacerbate CCD. With that in mind,
scientists have not abandoned experiments investigating these candidates.

2. *Style of feeding bees and type of bee food:* The style of feeding
bees and types of bee food used to feed bees vary considerably among
beekeepers reporting CCD losses. As such, no correlation has been found
between what colonies were fed and their likelihood of survival. Despite
this lack of evidence, many beekeepers have abandoned the practice of
feeding high fructose corn syrup to bees due to indications that it can form
byproducts that are harmful to bees.

3. *How the bees were managed:* Management style is a broad category
but it can include the type of income pursued with bees (honey production,
pollination services, etc.) or what routine colony management beekeepers
perform (splitting hives, swarm control, chemical use, etc.). As you can
imagine, both of these vary considerably among beekeepers so this possible
cause of CCD is given less attention. That said, poor management can make
any colony malady worse.

4. *Queen source:* Initial investigations considering queen source as
a cause of CCD have turned up no evidence that the disorder is tied to queen
production. Yet, scientists are investigating the lack of genetic diversity
and lineage of bees, both related to queen quality, as possible causes of
CCD. Regarding the former, it has been said that fewer than 500 breeder
queens produce the millions of queen bees (and therefore all bees) used
throughout the U.S. Geneticists refer to this as a genetic bottle
neck. This lack of genetic biodiversity has, in effect, made U.S.
honey bees a virtual monoculture. Monocultures usually are susceptible to
any pest/disease that invades the system. Honey bees are no exception.

5. *Chemical use in bee colonies:* Without doubt, the beekeeping
industry is overly-dependent on chemical pesticides and antibiotics used to
treat various bee-related maladies. Overuse and misuse of these chemicals
(including insecticides, vitamins, snake oils, etc.) is rampant. In many
cases, the pesticides used to control varroa
miteand small
hive beetles(just
to name two examples) double as insecticides in other pest management
schemes. Putting insecticides into insect colonies cannot be beneficial to
bees, even if the chemicals are not killing the bees outright. A number of
newly-discovered, sub-lethal effects of these chemicals on honey bees
(workers, queens, and drones) should be given stronger consideration as
possible causes of CCD.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What causes CCD? Part Two
Posted by: chlamor on Jun 11, 2007 6:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
6. *Chemical toxins in the environment:* A popular theory is that
chemical toxins in the environment are responsible for CCD. In many
instances, the beekeepers reporting colony losses manage large migratory
beekeeping operations. In migratory operations, beekeepers move bees from
blooming crop to blooming crop around the country. Because pesticides are
used widely in cropping systems in an effort to kill herbivorous insects,
one is left to consider the potential for non-target chemical effects on
bees. In addition to being exposed to chemicals while foraging on our
nation's crops, honey bees also may acquire chemicals through contaminated
water sources as they drink water containing chemical runoff. Conceivably,
these chemical residues can accumulate in wax and food stores in the colony,
thus killing bees.

7. *Genetically modified crops:* A number of people have blamed
genetically modified crops for the widespread bee deaths. Scientists have
begun initial investigations into this theory but all available data suggest
that genetically modified crops are not the culprit, at least as far as the
plants themselves are concerned. Interestingly, many seeds from which
genetically modified crops are grown are dipped first in systemic
insecticides that later appear in the plants' nectar and pollen. This makes
genetically modified plants suspect because of their chemical treatment
history, not because they are genetically modified.

8. *Varroa mites and associated pathogens:* Even with the hysteria
surrounding CCD, varroa
miteremains
the world's most prolific honey bee killers. Not surprisingly,
varroa and the viruses they transmit have been considered as possible causes
of CCD. The primary flaw with this theory is that varroa have been in the
U.S. only since 1987. Therefore, it is impossible for varroa to have
caused the CCD-like outbreaks that occurred prior to 1987. A final point
worth considering in the varroa/CCD issue is that many of the chemicals used
in bee colonies are used to control varroa. So varroa (perhaps not directly)
has been considered a leading candidate because the mite itself is damaging,
it transmits viruses to bees, and it elicits an all-out chemical assault
from beekeepers.

9. *Nutritional fitness:* Scientists have proposed nutritional fitness
of adult bees as a potential cause of CCD. This topic is being investigated
although little information exists currently to suggest nutrition is playing
a role. Malnutrition is a stress to bees, possibly weakening the bees'
immune system. This could have devastating effects on the bees' ability to
fight pests and diseases.

10. *Undiscovered/new pests and diseases:* Finally, undiscovered or
unidentified pests/pathogens are considered a possible cause of CCD. Many of
the known bee pests and diseases in the U.S. were introduced in the
last 30 years. We can expect this trend to continue as globalization
increases. This is already happening. For example, *Nosema apis* (a
protozoa that lives in the digestive tract of honey bees) has been present
in the U.S. for many years. In 2006, scientists discovered and
identified a new nosema species, *Nosema ceranae*, present in some
colonies displaying symptoms of CCD (it also has been found in bee samples
dating back to 1995). When this disease is present in bees in elevated
levels, the bees wander from colonies, never to return.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a little clarification
Posted by: DeAnander on Jun 11, 2007 7:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually the commercial beekeepers are forcing bees to use *larger* cell sizes, a practise that started in C19 in an attempt to "improve" bees by making them larger and stronger and to suppress/discourage drone cell creation. Commercial -- let's be honest and say "industrial" beekeepers -- consider drones to be freeloaders, as they do not participate in pollen and nectar gathering. A scarcity of drones may lead -- by the iron law of Unintended Consequences -- to a diminution of genetic diversity at queen mating time and hence to weaker colonies and less fecund queens than natural hives with a higher drone percentage.

Organic beekeepers using "small cell" foundation or (better yet) foundationless top-bar hives, have far less trouble with varroa infestation. Their aim is to restore apis mellifera to its pre-"improvement" size and it seems to be working very well.

Factory beekeepers have also attempted to breed varieties of bees who collect more nectar than pollen -- or the beeks rob pollen stores to package pollen for sale -- substituting artificial feeds based on soy protein (and how much of that is GMO by now?). Many extract all the honey from working hives and then feed the bees sugar syrup overwinter -- a far inferior food source deficient in all the complex enzymes and amino acids that make (raw) honey such a fine nutrient for humans as well as bees. Some attempt to force queen bees to lay faster and more prolifically than is their nature (and that's saying something, since a healthy queen is a prodigious egg layer). If you add it all up, it's another case of factory farming, where we are trying to turn animals into machines -- for our convenience and to their great detriment.

Factory farmed dairy cows are sickly short-lived creatures, kept alive on antibiotics and "burnt out" (scrapped for cheap meat) by the age of 3 or 4... a family dairy cow in the traditional farming milieu would live to be 15 or even 20 or so before she was eventually slaughtered for meat -- like a laying chicken her food value as a steady dairy producer was far more important than her short-term value as a meat bonanza. We are trying to force faster and greater productivity out of living organisms, like Pharaoh's overseers whipping the slaves in the brickyards until they drop dead, with no regard for their health or their natural proclivities (for contrast read about Joel Salatin's far more efficient and less cruel grass-farming operation, in which the farmed animals are recruited as "volunteer labour" to do what they do best, while growing to marketable size and/or producing eggs or dairy the whole while).

Why would we expect any organism -- ourselves included -- to thrive under prison/slavery conditions, being overcrowded, forced and interfered with, mercilessly driven and then heavily medicated to overcome the inevitable diseases of stress and poor nutrition and overcrowding? People do not thrive in sweatshops or as slaves on the plantation, with more "value" being extorted from them than their nature and biology can bear.