Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Natural Baby, Poisonous World

By Brita Belli, E Magazine. Posted May 17, 2007.


While raising a child more naturally does involve buying more organic and nontoxic products, it's also about fostering the kind of instinctive bond that's so easily lost in our high-stress, pre-packaged world.
Advertisement

Raising a natural baby in a chemical world is not so easy. Watchdog groups like Children's Health Environment Coalition (CHEC) and Environmental Working Group (EWG) regularly release frightening studies about the levels of toxins in everything from mother's breast milk to jarred baby food, from crib mattresses to pacifiers. It's a boon for the organic baby product machine, but overwhelming for already stressed-out eco-minded parents. While these organizations offer recommendations on how to steer a child's development in a healthier direction, nothing short of a chemical suit seems safe.

And it's not enough to worry how chemicals will affect one's child; how will all those products designed for bringing up baby exact a toll on the environment? The average baby poops and pees through some 8,000 diapers before potty training, a number that's on the rise with the increased social acceptability of pull-up diapers designed for toddlers. Then there are the baby food jars, the formula cans, the plastic containers of wipes, the scented disposable diaper bags, the plastic swings and teething rings and the crib with all its trimmings. And green varieties of every baby product are proliferating online and on supermarket shelves: from nontoxic cleaners to chlorine-free diapers and organic cotton crib mattresses minus the flame-retardant chemicals.

I gave birth to my first baby, a daughter, five months ago. There was no birthing tub or midwife; the labor ended in both an epidural and a Caesarean at a traditional hospital. But even though my vision of a "natural birth" was derailed by medical intervention, I found myself drawn to the idea of raising a natural baby. I carried little Eleanore everywhere. Despite borrowing a co-sleeper that attaches to the bed, Elli inevitably spent the night sleeping between me and my husband. She's used her crib only a handful of times and on those nights I slept terribly, listening to her ragged breathing over the monitor, waiting for the slightest whimper of discomfort. I breastfed Elli on demand, which presented a problem only at certain family gatherings. "One word: formula," said a cousin. I was given an expensive automatic swing, but I've used it reluctantly only on a couple occasions. A playpen, another gift, has been folded away.

Though it's never been a conscious decision, I became a practitioner of Attachment Parenting. Since then, I've met other parents who guiltily admit they sleep with their babies and continue to breastfeed past a child's first birthday. But though I've still yet to see another woman breastfeed in public (ever!) the stigma surrounding instinct-driven parenting is beginning to retreat.

Growing Attached

The plain truth is that parents can't shop their way out of every problem. While having more eco-friendly options on store shelves is helpful in looking for healthier alternatives, science has yet to catch up with the onslaught of marketing that pushes parents to go green. It's even possible that raising a natural baby and minimizing one's impact on the Earth has less to do with buying products than choosing not to engage quite so enthusiastically in the consumer culture.

Attachment Parenting is a much kindler, gentler alternative to the old "let them cry it out" school. It means that newborns don't need strict sleeping and feeding schedules. Instead, adherents support breastfeeding, carrying the baby close to the body in a sling or carrier, co-sleeping with the baby in a "family bed," and responding immediately to cries.

Renowned baby guru Dr. T. Berry Brazelton, founder of the Child Development Unit at Children's Hospital Boston and author of the bestselling book Touchpoints: Birth to Three (revised last year) doesn't use the term "Attachment Parenting." But he says its concepts are nothing new. "Most of the world carries their babies [in wraps or slings]," he says, and most engage in co-sleeping. "Ours is the newest adaptation. It's universal in developed countries. I approve, but it's not realistic to push down people's throats."

Rather than an all-or-nothing approach, Brazelton says "there are many ways to nurture" a child, but paying attention to specific signals is part of that process. Having studied some 25,000 patients in his 50-year medical career, Brazelton discovered a regular pattern of regressions (called "touchpoints") that occur before the next spurt in development. During these stages (say, teething or potty training), "the child falls apart for a period of two to three days, and won't eat, while gathering steam for the next spurt." These touchpoints, he says, mimic similar patterns in primates. "Chimpanzees do the same thing," Brazelton says. "It's not unique to humans."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: parenting, baby, organic, diaper free

Brita Belli is managing editor of E Magazine, and mother of five-month-old Elli.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
JJinIthaca
Posted by: JJinIthaca on May 17, 2007 5:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry that your parenting methods are met with such ignorance if not resistance. It seems to be more the norm around here, and I would expect it varies greatly from locale to locale, region to region.
I initially thought this article was going to focus more on the attachment aspects of parenting, but it was more a smorgasbord about that and other things. Like a survey course. I'll admit I was thinking and hoping for a more psychosocial treatment, in part because there is very little (or nothing) written about it in websites like this (of a 'political' nature) and also it is more my interests. I just took out from the library and am reading a very interesting book that, when it was written, went a ways to bring 'attachment parenting' into the modern age, and was parent (so to speak) to many of its later advocates/proselytizers: the Origins of Love and Hate by Ian Suttie, written in the mid-1930's. Interesting, and highly recommended.
An interesting website demonstrating where many of these ideas can lead to is www.violence.de/
Another: primal-page.com/psyhis.htm#menu

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JJinIthaca Posted by: N-o-b-o
Eek!
Posted by: Allison on May 17, 2007 6:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I support anyone else's decision to have kids, it's articles like this that remind me why I don't want to have them myself. Well, this, and the fact that a bunch of my friends seem to have lost much of their own personality as soon as they have babies...

Just a reminder to all that even "attachment parenting" does not mean that your baby, care and feeding of, has to become your new all-consuming hobby. You're allowed to retain your own life. Baby will get by just fine even if you don't spend 9 hours a day researching macrobiotic formula recipes on the internet and making your own diapers from organic cotton. And good luck!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Adopt, please...aren't there enough humans on the planet already?
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on May 17, 2007 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Adopt, please...aren't there enough humans on the planet already?

Doesn't matter how eco your babies diapers are. We have too many humans on the planet.

Before breeding, consider adoption. Take care of the humans already here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Toxins and Chemicals and Un-natural Products, Oh My!
Posted by: jwc on May 17, 2007 7:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm gonna take this opportunity of being one of the first posters on this article to give some of you a much needed reality-check.

I know all of you freakin' socialist hippies grow a big rubbery one every time you hear the words 'natural' and 'organic,' and while most of you probably won't bother reading the link I'll post below, I can't help but post it anyway- if for no other reason than to piss you off- but hey, maybe even one of you will see reason.

Click here for a response to the standard argument most of you would make in defense of your precious "natural" products.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ho hum, industry troll.... Posted by: DeAnander
Children balance self-centeredness
Posted by: haystack1317 on May 17, 2007 7:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's a reason that people tend to lose some of their personality when they have children. The reason is that they've learned what it means to sacrifice and to give over the part of the ego that fights desperately for itself to something deeper and larger. Children are the ultimate teachers of some of life's most valuable lessons -- humility, acceptance, generosity, compassion, etc., etc. I'm not saying that a life without children is incomplete, but I am suggesting to those who lament the changes in their friends' behavior that those shifts come from new parents heading in a more selfless direction, and I believe firmly that we all benefit from less focus on the self and its desires.

I'm sure many will think I'm saying that parents are, on average, less self-centered than non-parents. If self-centeredness is framed literally as how much one's "self" is the center of one's universe, than I suppose it's true.

While some lament the changes in their friends who have had children, I can honestly say that I've watched several of mine who haven't remain stagnant and self-focused well into their later years. It's very clear to me that some friends who have remained childless have also remained childish.

Am I saying that's the case every time? No way. Am I saying that there aren't plenty of parents out there who never made this shift and remained as self-centered as ever? Of course not. And are there plenty of childless people who have lived lives of selflessness? Of course. But in my experience, and speaking in averages, as I say above, I've found that the changes that occur with having children are essential shifts towards sacrifice and compassion in life. These lessons can be learned other ways, of course, but if they are never learned the world suffers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Mom Guilt
Posted by: MatthewSavage on May 18, 2007 11:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very well said. As a relatively recent father (my daughter just reached 7 months yesterday) I don't read baby books. I don't put all the burden on my wife either; she reads no baby books. We do what we think is best and what seems best for our daughter.

It's really not all that hard to determine. We use cloth diapers; we have baby-food now to try out what she likes, but are getting a little portable hand-grinder for when we go out. She'll just eat what we eat.

Like the author, we sort-of practice "attachment parenting," but more by making her a part of our lives. We go out almost as much as we ever did, we just bring a baby with us when we do. She's a big hit at the parties we go to. It takes more work, but when we share that extra work it's really not so terrible.

Just pay attention to the child, it'll almost always be obvious what they want and need. There is no need to compare to other children and parents, as they're all different. Mine is long and thin, but she's consistently gaining weight... so it's not worrisome. People need to just relaxe and let it happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

POOP ON THE RICH. HEMP DIAPERS!!!
Posted by: WitchyNy on May 17, 2007 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why don't we have fiber diapers that you can just throw away?

Dig a hole in the backyard. Fill it with compost and dirty fabric diapers. Then plant a tree. By the end of baby's first year-you should have a lot of nice trees growing in your backyard. Instead of buying cow manure.

Then instead of washing the cotton diapers over and over..which requires hot water-bleach-and soap-just 'compost them'. And as long as the babys waste is organic and vegetarian-should be mostly breast milk the first year-I don't see any health issue.

How much should it cost to make cotton diapers? (or better yet-hemp diapers)-We need to start considering economic cost vs cost to our environment. But then we would have to change our profits- for -the- rich- first system-wouldn't we?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Watch your immunization contents
Posted by: fanny666 on May 17, 2007 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yet another Way-Bigger-Than-Watergate scandal by Bush et al... the FDA cover-up of mercury-based preservatives in childhood immunizations.

Deadly Immunity: Mercury in Childhood Immunization Shots

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a real nature baby
Posted by: verb8m on May 17, 2007 9:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All this organic, natural stuff is just window dressing, a consumer smokescren when you omit the most basic condition for a natural baby/childhood - a body free from toxins. And you'll only get this when you cease to immunize your children. Immunization destroys a child's immune system, setting them up for a lifetime of pharma consumption. You read the ingredient labels on your baby food but do you think to ask the doctor what toxins you're pumping into your innocent child (oh and how much he makes on each shot?).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some practical ideas
Posted by: rhonnamae23 on May 18, 2007 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just so you know, you don't have to use bleach with cloth diapers. Hot water and sunshine kill everything. I've done this with 2 children with almost no diaper rash.
Also, instead of spending all that money on organic cleaners, vinegar and baking soda will clean almost anything.
Our motto has been to do our best for the environment within the bounds of living a sane life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Some practical ideas Posted by: Reginleif
» RE: Some practical ideas Posted by: MatthewSavage
» RE: Some practical ideas Posted by: MatthewSavage
Babies emit carbon
Posted by: esunz on May 21, 2007 6:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From a coldly factual standpoint, the decision to have a baby at all is probably the single most environmentally detrimental decision any individual can ever make, regardless of any post-partum efforts to reduce it's impact. Unless, of course, your baby turns out to be some sort of prophet or person of consequence who catalyzes political sentiment leading to a global reduction in greenhouse gases (as I'm sure my 7-week old will become).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]