Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Environment

Fighting the Corporate Theft of Our Water

By Tara Lohan, AlterNet. Posted April 25, 2007.


The Bush administration is helping put our most important resource in the hands of corporations with no public accountability.
50994story
50994story
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

All across the United States, municipal water systems are being bought up by multinational corporations, turning one of our last remaining public commons and our most vital resource into a commodity.

The road to privatization is being paved by our own government. The Bush administration is actively working to loosen the hold that cities and towns have over public water, enabling corporations to own the very thing we depend on for survival.

The effects of the federal government's actions are being felt all the way down to Conference of Mayors, which has become a "feeding frenzy" for corporations looking to make sure that nothing is left in the public's hands, including clean, affordable water.

Documentary filmmakers Alan Snitow and Deborah Kaufman recently teamed up with author Michael Fox to write "Thirst: Fighting the Corporate Theft of Our Water" (Wiley, 2007). The three followed water privatization battles across the United States -- from California to Massachusetts and from Georgia to Wisconsin, documenting the rise of public opposition to corporate control of water resources.

They found that the issue of privatization ran deep.

"We came to see that the conflicts over water are really about fundamental questions of democracy itself: Who will make the decisions that affect our future, and who will be excluded?" they wrote in the book's preface. "And if citizens no longer control their most basic resource, their water, do they really control anything at all?"

As the effects of climate change are being felt around the world, including decreasing snowpacks and rainfall, water is quickly becoming the market's new holy grail.

Mayor Gary Podesto, in his State of the City address to his constituents in 2003, sang the praises of privatization to his community, located in California's Central Valley. "It's time that Stockton enter the 21st century in its delivery of services and think of our citizens as customers," he said.

And there is the crux of the issue -- privatization means transforming citizens into customers. Or, in other words, making people engaged in a democratic process into consumers looking to get the best deal.

It is also means taking our most important resource and putting it at the whims of the market.

Currently, water systems are controlled publicly in 90 percent of communities across the world and 85 percent in the United States, but that number is changing rapidly, the authors report in "Thirst." In 1990, 50 million people worldwide got their water services from private companies, but by 2002 it was 300 million and growing.

There are a number of reasons to be concerned.

"Globally, corporations are promoting water privatization under the guise of efficiency, but the fact is that they are not paying the full cost of public infrastructure, environmental damage, or healthcare for those they hurt," said Ashley Schaeffer of Corporate Accountability International. "Water is a human right and not a privilege."

There are also significant environmental considerations -- with private corporations, sustainability can be tossed out the window. "Climate change is a warning that uncontrolled abuse of the earth's natural resources is leading toward planetary catastrophe," the authors write in "Thirst." "Who is to set the necessary limits to the abuse of the environment? Private companies fighting for market share are incapable of doing so."

Privatization has been pushed aggressively at the federal level for decades, but especially so in the last six years. "There is a kind of fire sale of everything in the public sector right now," said Alan Snitow. "Water, we think, is the line in the sand -- when your water is actually a profit mechanism, people really react negatively to that."

"Thirst" beautifully documents the coalitions that are forming in communities that are fighting back. But the battles are not easy: They must confront massive political muscle and unlimited financial resources of multinational corporations, not to mention our society's religious belief in the power of the marketplace.

Privatizing municipal water systems is globalization come home, said Deborah Kaufman. In 2000 Bechtel privatized water in Cochabamba, Bolivia, with such miserable consequences that it was shortly driven out of the country in an incredible feat of cross-class organizing. But just a few years later, it was awarded a $680 million contract to "fix" Iraq's ruined water systems.

"What's happened in Iraq is really emblematic of what the Bush administration is doing," said Kaufman. "We view the privatization of water in the United States as the World Bank come home -- the third-worldization of America and American communities."

It turns out the United States is an attractive place for multinationals looking to make inroads in the water business. The three main players are the French companies Suez and Veolia (formerly Vivendi), and the German group RWE.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, water privatization

Tara Lohan is a managing editor at AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
RE: Could the Hebrews sink any lower than this?-Not just water!
Posted by: flipside on Apr 25, 2007 4:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Google "Monsanto terminator" or follow the links below for german articles.
Gentechnik-Konzern Monsanto bricht Versprechen
Anwendung von Terminator-Technologie nicht länger tabu
Monsanto kauft Firma für
‘Terminator’-Saatgut

Water resources controlled by big business,
Food resources controlled by big business
and no buying or selling without "proper" identification.

So...when are we allowed to be scared?

Forget the small issues that serve to divide the common man, there are issues enough to unite the common man all over the world if people would only realize that the successfull roman strategy "divide et imperare", or divide and conquer is alive and well in the "fourth reich" that the USA has become and decide not to let the rich and privileged choose the theme of the latest debate. This is a class war and the so-called elite are winning thus far!

Stay vigilant!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Wassermann," ha ha Nazi troll
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Apr 25, 2007 4:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've reported your disgusting comment, & point out meanwhile that although there are a few people with maybe-Jewish names mentioned in the article, they are all protesting this phenomenon.

Hey waterboy, to the average American "Wassermann" sounds Jewish too!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Could the Hebrews sink any lower than this?
Posted by: talkville on Apr 25, 2007 5:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Milton Friedman and the "Chicago Boys" (the "Washington Consensus" used Chile as a test case. The application is now 'globalized'. Neo-liberal economics coupled with neo-conservative politics (with more than a dash of evangelical zealotry) has secured for the relatively few 'royal' families and their courtiers (tax-cuts and severe restriction on the Estate Tax - an inheritance mechanism) a good living for quite a while to come. The 'common people' are showing signs they've caught on to the ruse. Class, race and gender are relatively new to this country - based on that British bias of monarchy, lords and commoners; awareness will grow, despite all those desperate efforts of the ruling classes. This has been Weimar from the beginning (with a British inflection) for about 200 years or so. Comfy sofas wear out, and they are much more difficult to replace as the years go by. The contradictions of capital can't be deferred forever either in extension or intension. We all need lots of luck, and organization. As far as 'tolerance' is concerned, the stupidity is mis-placed. It's fun and very easy to blame; the alternative you offer I, for one, will reject. Stupidity, like many other economic relations, is globalized.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wasserman is a Jewish name, too...
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Apr 25, 2007 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wasserman is a Jewish name, too...
You're part Jewish so stop hating on your own people. NONE of the presidents and very few congressional reps are Jewish. These are the folks selling away our basic human rights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Capitalism is what's brought these things, not tolerance.
Posted by: catnapping on Apr 25, 2007 7:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Making people pay for food, shelter and medicine is every bit as immoral as charging them for water.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Which... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Which... Posted by: EagleMB
RE: Could the Hebrews sink any lower than this?
Posted by: MAD on Apr 25, 2007 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Smells like a Weimar Germany waiting to happen."

And apparently the Blitzkrieg was already successful in whatever far-flung corner of the world you inhabit, Herr Hess. I suspect that whatever mud brick hovel you occupy still reeks of the dead animals you frequently torture in your early 21st century neo-goth, swastika-laden "home". I bet there's a lingering scent of Old Spice in the air, you know, just to add a touch of class, cuz you're obviously a VERY classy guy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Could the Hebrews sink any lower than this? RACIST RANTING UNWANTED HERE
Posted by: Betsyny on Apr 25, 2007 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Enough of the racism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The transformation proceeds
Posted by: talkville on Apr 25, 2007 3:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Two candidates for the 2008 presidential election have expressly invoked the image of the "CEO" to bolster their images. Both corporations and the state have bureaucracies. The corporate state we currently have is consolidating rapidly and has been for quite a long while. We may wear a thousand hats -'consumer', 'client', 'patient', 'producer', etc and etc. Time to dust off the Citizen hat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Privatization of public-owned water companies is related to so-called free trade agreements.
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 25, 2007 3:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only Americans with room-temperature IQ do not understand the motive behind free-trade agreements: turn the United States into a permanent two-class, Have and Have-not society. Privatization of public water utilities is simply an extension of the greed-driven, ruling class agenda on a global scale. It’s all about controlling people and money worldwide.

The article points out that Bill Clinton is a supporter of water company privatization. That revelation should come as no surprise. During his eight years in office, Slick Willie promoted international trade agreements like NAFTA that favored foreign counties and hurt working Americans.

Just as bad from a patriotic point, the greedy bastard took $500,000 to lobby for a Dubai company during the U.S ports takeover fiasco. Hillary is just as selfish. Currency, not country, will always come first in her elitist upper-crust life.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You got it correct, eggnog2464. Posted by: HughScott
» Ok, but is sarcasm enough? Posted by: talkville
He'll die in federal custody
Posted by: Tom Degan on Apr 25, 2007 3:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The dispicable motherfucker this country stupidly sent to the White House in 2000 will be the first president in history to go to federal prison. He will die there. I promise you that.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Doesn't it take two-thirds of the Senate to remove a president? Posted by: Robert_Hoogenboom@leftfoot.com.au
» He will not be pres forever! Posted by: mdruss42
» From your mouth to God's ears... Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» Thistleblower.... Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Thistleblower.... Posted by: Age of Reason
z1ricardo
Posted by: z on Apr 25, 2007 4:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is what America is all about, selling out our rights, our privileges, our very lives. Hell, we've got a rich oilman out in Texas who's been buying up water rights for years. There is not any common good, only common greed. How much do you want for your soul, mister?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: z1ricardo Posted by: talkville
» It's called CAPITALISM! Posted by: thistleblower
Water is the lifeblood of civilization
Posted by: vkobaya on Apr 25, 2007 5:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
which is why it was considered a utility that could not be used for profit taking. Consider what has happened to the price of gasoline which is predicted to hit $4 a gallon in a month. Even more extreme is the criminal gouging on the price of electricity two years ago in California where the prices were hundreds of times over normal while the energy traders laughed about wiping out grandmother's savings and killing babies in hospitals. Private industry is totally without morals except the bottom line and greed is God. Here in S. California, the current season has had a rainfall total of 3 inches. That will be justification to send us all water bills for hundreds or thousands of dollars a month. Plus, do you really want to trust private industry with being responsible for the safety of our water? Private industry has given us the E. coli contamination of our produce last summer and the poisioning of our pets in the last month. The contaminated ingredients in the pet food was rated food grade, meaning that it could have contaminated the human food supply as well. FDA won't even tell us the names of the companies involved. My private theory is that they are hiding human deaths to protect the corporations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

otto
Posted by: otto on Apr 25, 2007 5:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Up here in Canukland, this same battle has been led by Maude Barlow and her Council of Canadians, as part of the war against corporate control of the universe. "The Canadian Catholic Organization for Development and Peace" has also been carrying on a water campaign in recent years. But we have to fight Stephen Harper and his conservative government on all issues, as he strives to take Blair's place as Bush's main lackey; he's pushing for more Candians to die in Afghanistan just as Bush is pushing the same for Iraq (and Iran?) Two big water issues are: 1) Great Lakes Water, which Texas and the Southwest want to take out by a new pipeline; ten states and two provinces are working to fight this project. 2) T.I.L.M.A., (Trade, Investment, and Labor Mobility Agreement) an agreement between provinces to get rid of restrictions and allow corporations to sue governments for inconveniences to making money. Shades of NAFTA? And there is a secret movement on to open a special trade corridor between northeast states and northeast provinces...many of us progressive Canuks (actually, I'm also American!) see it as selling Canada's sovereignty off to Bush's Republican Empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: otto Posted by: Gisele
» RE: otto Posted by: eggnog2464
How long can you hold your breath?
Posted by: shangrilalad on Apr 25, 2007 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just be glad that Republicans haven’t contrived a way to bill us for breathing. They are working on it though, once they have polluted the planet to the point that air is unbreathable, they will sell us gas masks.

.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What??? Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: What??? Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: What??? Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: What??? Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: How is that relevent? Posted by: EagleMB
the solution?
Posted by: craftne on Apr 25, 2007 6:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I, for one, would like to see a new strategy at AlterNet. Solutions. So report the story. Then find strategists who can tell us how to change things.

This is nothing new. After all, Enron tried to trade WEATHER. Enron was a warning, but we keep working for these people.

This is a big ask, but this whole problem began early last century when the Supreme Court gave corporations the rights of an individual. We need to reverse that, declared it a failed and dangerous threat to citizens.

The result? The average person would perhaps have lobbying power they have lost having big business in governments' (yes, not only ours) pockets.

Do we just want to complain, or do we want to be the generation that changes things?

Or perhaps the next generation can clean up the legacy of our failures....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the solution? Posted by: gbreez
» RE: the solution? Posted by: Lincoln fan
Take Back our government.
Posted by: leedavis546@msn.com on Apr 25, 2007 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are good people in both the Republican & Deemocratic party. many became politcians, believing they could improve the lives of Americans, most of them are Senators & Congressmen and women, who have been in office many years.many of these individuals,are not happy with the way things are, but they need money to get elected. So they end up selling there Soul to the the wealthy individauls, who can Finance there election. We must demand that congress work on legislation,that will give us Public Campaign Financing, that will make it unlawful,for any public official to except Private Funds while In office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Take Back our government. Posted by: Lincoln fan
Red Brown and Blue Party comment
Posted by: redbrownandblueparty on Apr 25, 2007 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem is clear and getting clearer. The solution is to clean house. One statement jumped out at me from the above: "Religious belief in the power of the marketplace." Belief systems are the problem. But you can't simply avoid them. Not believing in anything is another belief system. Atheism is a non-belief belief system. An alternative belief system incorporating the enlightenment and reason is needed. RBB advocates for The Lover Government which believes in Love as the ultimate power, which does not abuse lower powers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So I guess
Posted by: WhatNow? on Apr 25, 2007 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we're going to see our what can be done to our water supply as was done in parts of south america by enron.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So I guess Posted by: Mop Cheese
'holy' sacred water... watersage child
Posted by: 360guy on Apr 25, 2007 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'medication of america' thru fluoridation ... makes the populace complacent and allows the greedy bottom line only bas 'turds' to influence [buy] many of the politicians... and the 'people' get the raw end of the deal....again...STOP privatization of public water supplies NOW..and reverse the take overs of previously privatized public water systems....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Suffer the little children...
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Apr 25, 2007 7:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Suffer the little children...

Praise the goddess/buddha that I'm 45 years old and not 2 years old. What kind of world are we leaving behind for future generations!?!?

Why would anyone have children?!? I can't even imagine....

Did anyone see "Idiocracy?" Brawndo, it has electrolytes....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Catbird
Posted by: Catbird on Apr 25, 2007 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A well-written, very important article regarding the corporate theft of our water. I urge every reader to pass this along to as many persons and organizations as possible - especially to your state and local legislators!

I would normally have included this article in THE CATBIRD SEAT website at http://www.the-catbird-seat.net/BlueGold.htm ... HOWEVER, this site has been CLOSED DOWN by the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ALBERTO GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, JAMES B. NICHOLSON, TRUSTEE, by Order of JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA.

Consequently, I have now posted this important article in "The Catbird's Forum" located at: http://www.voy.com/129276/522.html . (I advise you to view it NOW - before it, too, is TERMINATED by THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE!)

VOTE TO IMPEACH BUSH!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Catbird Posted by: callistocat
The USA steals water from other countries.
Posted by: catnapping on Apr 25, 2007 7:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We've been stealing water from mexico for decades and decades. We dammed up the Colorado to divert it from Mexico.

We might wanna stop diverting water to the parasites in L.A. while we're at it.

Why do people live where there is no water, and then expect the rest of us to send them OURS????

While we're at it...stop WHELPING. Use birth control, get your tubes tied...vas or fallopian, I don't care! If you want children, ADOPT.

We're running out of resources, water included...there are too many of us, and we're killing the planet...we are the cancer.

We DO NOT have the right to use up and pollute the earth's resources. Water belongs to everyTHING on the planet. No more dams...dismantle them all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» clarification... Posted by: catnapping
Water Privatisation
Posted by: itchyvet on Apr 25, 2007 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hah, hah, hah, LOL, really people have to hand it to the good old Yanks, never fail to give me a good laugh.
So you've all got your noses outa joint cause your fantastic heroes in the Whitehouse,(who've you all voted for, remember?) are selling you down the gurgler.(no pun intended)
So what's the big deal, where were you all, when the Privatisation train left the station and attacked other countries round the World, all to YOUR benefit,(at first) did'nt see any complaints then did we ?
Problem is, very few of you ever gave thought, that the ideas coming from the U.S. and being foisted on the rest of the World would eventually boomerang and find their way home .
After all, what's good fer the Goose, is also good fer the Gander, right ?
So finally Americans are beginning to reap what they've sown on others, and you don't like it one bit.
Aww, that's just too bad now, gives me great satisfaction though, to see that NONE of you are invulnerable, and are treated with just as much contempt by your Government and it's corporate masters as they've treated the rest of the World.
BUT, what are you gonna do about besides whinning and bitchin ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Water Privatisation Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Water Privatisation Posted by: Darrell Kern
» well, keep in mind.. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
One small step...maybe?
Posted by: Gisele on Apr 25, 2007 8:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the many blights I see as a result of bottled water is far too much plastic being created, when you consider that bottled water is a multi-billion dollar industry and has become the most profitable of all beverages (sorry Starbucks)...I'm not entirely surprised that BushHarp wants to have total control of it.

But!..there really is no need to have to drink bottled water for health. I'm not sure how this is going to sound...I'm not coming at it from a shareholder perspective (water is still government regulated here) but that of a "user."

The city in which I live undertook a huge project to create a water treatment facility that is the only one of it's kind in North America. I have been able to enjoy this water for about 1 year now, and can tell you that it's better than ANY bottled water I've tasted...cleaner, fresher, no bitter plastic tastes left behind, no plastic in landfills, it has been worth it!

Do you think your city/province/state would be interested in doing something that creates better health, while maintaining control of resource that no one has the right to stop you from using? You can find out a lot more here ..maybe we'll have more success fighting 'for' something rather than against it.

Just trying to offer a possible solution...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Name ONE good thing
Posted by: willymack on Apr 25, 2007 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That can be attributed to this vile and illegal "administration". The list of their crimes against Humanity, Americans, and Mother Nature herself is almost endless. Not satisfied with the theft of nearly everything worth having, these greedy bastards now want to control the very water we drink. What's next-the air we breathe? There are two points I'd like to air here. First is the mental illness known as Greed. There is no known cure for this perversion, only control measures aimed at preventing the Greedy from bleeding us dry. Second is the old saw that (somehow) the Jews are behind all of this. The whole religion and culture of Judaism is based on Humanitarian principles, and there is NO evidence that a Jewish plot against the rest of us is afoot, just the rantings of bigots and ignoramuses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Name ONE good thing Posted by: Darrell Kern
It's about Empire building and natural resources
Posted by: Betsyny on Apr 25, 2007 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only thing that occurred to me as I read this article was "remember Bolivia." This business of turning public goods into private ones is just part of a generalized effort to expand the U.S. empire. One more natural resource to control, one more market to brainwash with "free market" ideology. The thing is that while we aren't paying attention because all this is happening to "somebody else," they turn it back inward so that internally we are going through the same things we said nothing about when our government did them to others.

Remember though, the Bolivians overthrew their own government to get rid of this nonsenes. The current govt of Bolivia has its roots in the water fiasco and is aligned with Hugo Chavez because of the water fiasco - not only were things much more expensive, thereby depriving the poor an essential necessity, but the delivery was much more corrupt an inefficient. Of course the poor suffered the most under the scheme.

So, multinational greed mongers watch out. You REALLY can't fool all the people all the time. We'll get you yet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For F*ck Sake People . . . Lighten Up Already!
Posted by: MAD on Apr 25, 2007 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So Merck, ADM, PepsiCo, etc. want to control your drinking water . . what's the big F'ing problem here? They only want to do right by the people, and if you search your souls, you know I'm right. It's not like there's any precedent for this anti-corporate hysteria. What has TXU energy ever done to you?

We're talking about the same companies that practically give away life-saving prescription drugs like Vioxx and Celebrex, and at $150 a bottle, that's really something to Celebrate. They're only price gouging so they can bring you new, fast-tracked killers, er, winners like Redux and Bextra. Come on people, stop being so cynical and get down with the privatized water scheme!

If Pepsi wants to add sugar and artificial vanilla flavoring to my tap water, I say bring it on baby!! I wouldn't mind a little caffeine thrown in for good measure either. If ADM wants to divert my drinking water to some inefficient and wasteful ethanol corn ranch, why should I care? Ethanol's the wonder fuel of the future, no? And if some golf consortium wants to divert the remaining water to parched desert resorts so wealthy old men who are 45 seconds away from their next stroke can piss away what's left of their lives, then how is that any of our business?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not only water
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Apr 25, 2007 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are three basic thoughts here that don't only apply to water but to our insane political system.

But this issue is a partisan problem. As reported in "Thirst," in 1997 the Clinton administration changed the law to the benefit of private companies.

This is obviously a typo; it should read "this is not a partisan problem. These non-partisan problems that are settled in favor of corporate interests and against public interest should make it clear to the public that both parties are controlled by the corporate establishment. As a corrolary to this, neither party is controlled by the voters, therefore, our elections are a charade.

And if citizens no longer control their most basic resource, their water, do they really control anything at all?"

The first quote makes the answer to this question "No, we don't control anything that involves corporate welfare".

Consider the cataclysmic implications of the following two thoughts.

Private companies fighting for market share are incapable of doing so."

In other words, private companies are incapable of setting the limits of environmental abuse or limiting anything else that will kill humans, that will lower profit. The corporations cannot be controlled by humans.

"Who is to set the necessary limits to the abuse of the environment?

The answer is, "The citizens, prefereably with laws passed by the government". This is impossible today because the corporate establishment controls both parties with generous campaign contributions and lavish multi-million dollar lobbies.

I believe that our welfare will deteriorate until we, the people, take control of both parties.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is a bit of a hatchet job, no?
Posted by: lamar on Apr 25, 2007 9:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article, and presumably the movie, don't address the strict oversight of the Public Service Commissions of the various states. Corporate profits are set at fixed levels, and any overages go back to consumers. Intricate corporate accounting is heavily regulated, as is customer service and water supply. This article confuses European utility holding companies, which increase water supply through immense capital investment, with American war profiteer companies, which apparently can't run any operation, let alone a water utility.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's MONEY in ..."them there hills"
Posted by: picket on Apr 25, 2007 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the sky hasn't fallen since this AM the World's Billionaires just made a killing in the stock market today. A little EXTRA now, to figure out how to squeeze the last drop of cash from the real"working Americans".

Lots of private money making ventures means fees and those that can afford them will ENJOY ...those that cannot will be abandoned. God Bless America!!!

"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul." George Bernard Shaw

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

January1937
Posted by: january37 on Apr 25, 2007 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In some places where water was privatized it became illegal to collect rain water. Multinationals want to own all of the sky, not just the part they already own.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NEW WORLD WATER
Posted by: new world water on Apr 25, 2007 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it diturbing that the comments on this subject have fallen to racial crap on Hebrews and names. This is the problem with the current conditions of our country. While the country is being taken right under our noses we spend time on this kind of nonsense. Who cares where the thieves are from. Evil has no particular race or culture. Evil is evil and not representative of any particular people or culture. Bush and his minions are not Hebrew and even if they were so what. The New world Order is the problem and it has minions from all over the globe. Time to wake up and grow up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NEW WORLD WATER Posted by: Gisele
» RE: NEW WORLD WATER Posted by: Darrell Kern
One other aspect
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Apr 25, 2007 11:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Veolia picked up U.S Filter, Suez got United Water and RWE took over American Water Works.

The results have been disastrous, as "Thirst" shows -- rates are increasing, quality is suffering, customer service is declining, profits are leaving communities and accountability has fallen by the wayside.


I know somebody who worked for U.S. Filter at the time of the Veolia takeover, and who lost their job shortly thereafter. I suppose this is par for the course, and maybe falls under "profits are leaving communities". U.S. Filter was a business - publicly traded I think - not a municipality, though it would be interesting to know whether they've raised prices or passed the theoretically increased efficiency resulting from the buyout through to their customers.

It was also a bit ironic to see a google ad at the top of the comments section basically hyping how one could get rich investing in water companies...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The World - 2050
Posted by: djnoll on Apr 25, 2007 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recently on Discovery Channel there was a program about what the world would be like in the year 2100 based on the affects of global warming. The show was enlightening as well as frightening. For those of us who live the Southwestern or Southern US, as well as parts of Northern South America, Southern Europe (to Northern France), Middle and Far East, 2050 or earlier are the dates we should be worried about because by then water will be more precious than oil if we want to survive. These lands will be turning to desert quickly as we deplete plant life and allow for unchecked global poisoning. If corporations are allowed to control water, anywhere in the world, then they will become the arbiters of who lives and who dies in this next century. THIS MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO HAPPEN!

If you have any doubts that this will be the case, look to the case histories in parts of Africa where people could not afford the costs charged by the water corporations. They are without water and must carry contaminated groundwater for miles, then boil it, everyday just to survive. With all groundwater now essentially poisoned by chemicals and other by-products of our civilization, the water needs to be pumped up for it to be drinkable and it needs to be desalinized as well. By allowing private water companies to control water and with governments unwilling to put in the infrastructure necessary to secure water for the public, we will not have to worry about population control. Water companies and their corporate leaders will decide who lives and who dies based solely on who can afford to pay their price.

Stop this kind of corporatism now - tell your communities to cancel or stop contracts with private water companies. Tell your state and local leaders to put their money into the infrastructure necessary for survival in 20 or 30 years, and do not let them tell you it is not necessary now, or that it will be somebody else's problem then so do not worry. Those "somebody else's" are your children and grandchildren, and they deserve better from you and from all of us.

http://www.standanddeliveramerica.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Customer vs Citizen
Posted by: lulugeez on Apr 25, 2007 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The trend of disenfranchisment had started long ago when the IRS and other gov. agencies began displaying signs hyping their customer services and refering to us as consumers. The sad thing is that these bureaucrats are sincere and ignorant of how insulting this is. They fancy themselves taking on the reformation of government to a more business-like model. They believe in theyselves as progressives. But the status of a consumer is considerably diminished from that of a citizen. Our local politicians are by and large chamber of commerce boosters, whether or not they are Dems or Repubs. Most American municipalilties no longer have an agora for citizen forums--these essential elements of citizen empowerment have been designed out of American civic life by suburban style development. The water barons know this. They know that there is little to stand between them and the venality of mayors and councils. Way too many Americans eschew their local newspapers for the NYT. They believe that the national or in'national is where it's happening. But think about how much could be done to halt the progress of the plutocrats if every town had a reliable team of alert, noisey, rude, and most importantly, persistant citizens!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Minneapolis rocks!!!!
Posted by: chaoslegs on Apr 25, 2007 12:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We had an update 2 years ago to I believe the most advanced water filteration plant in North America. The plant is owned by the city, and the water I drink out of my tap is great!

Read about the plant here.

The plant is owned by the City of Minneapolis and operated by Minneapolis Water Treatment & Distribution Services.

I would also recommend that folks read the great reporting by the Center for Public Integrity here.

But in practice, total cost recovery may have caused more misery than development. In poor areas where privatization has been implemented, millions of people have been cut off because they cannot afford to pay water bills that often make up 30 percent of their incomes.

As many as 10 million South Africans have had their water cut off for various periods of time since 1994, according to a 2002 national survey by the Municipal Services Project, a university-based research center with offices in South Africa and Canada. Two million people have been evicted from their homes for not paying utility bills. Many poor families pay up to 40 percent of their monthly income for water and electricity.

The water cutoffs have forced thousands of poor people to seek water from polluted rivers and lakes and led to South Africa's worst outbreak of cholera, in which thousands of people were sickened and hundreds died. In the end, the government spent millions of dollars to control the spread of the disease and to truck clean water to the stricken areas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

COVER UP
Posted by: Cathyc on Apr 25, 2007 4:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vkobaya wrote:
"My private theory is that they are hiding human deaths to protect the corporations."

The pro-Bush Admin IRISH (Roman Catholic) government has been doing this sort of thing for decades, but its a sad fact that most Irish people, like most Americans, don't want to believe it. They only believe it when they are one of the random victims. I am one such lucky person (random victim) who survived a major cover-up...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Long , long ago in a strange place called L.A.,
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Apr 25, 2007 6:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... not wanting to spend the money for a desalinization plant, the idiots who built a city of millions in a desert bought the water rights to a recreational lake called Lake Owens - and drained it literally to dust. Next they tried to get permission to build a pipeline from one of the Great Lakes, but were refused. Next they tried for the water rights in a beautiful mountainous area called Lone Pine, but were again refused. This time, they sent in fake cattlemen over a decade or so, and gained control of the water rights by stealth. Suddenly, the people of Lone Pine found themselves having to buy their own water for exorbitant prices (it cost a lot of money to send it to L.A., then send it back, they said). A shooting war ensued, and still hasn't completely died down decades later. People still blow up pumps now and then, shoot at the repairmen, and have bumper stickers that read "Stop the Pumps!" They haven't, though.

Some brain-dead person upstream in the comments said water's cheaper when corporations own and run it. Sorry Charlie, but NOT. It costs as much as they want to charge, and that's as much as they think they can get. No other country allows foreigners to buy property, especially the commons; just us. And corporations, even those based here, have NO business owning the commons - WE OWN THEM!

This HAS to be stopped before the multinationals start charging us for the polluted air we breathe - and don't think for a moment they wouldn't!

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to start charing for sunlight, I'm sure we can sell the rights to that off...
Posted by: ateo on Apr 25, 2007 10:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Man, this is disgusting. Privatization has gone too far. How stupid can people be not to see that giving corporations, who by their very nature exist to produce profits above all else, rights to control basic necessities and natural resources like water is a big mistake?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Actually, no. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Actually, no. Posted by: lamar
non-fluoridated water more consequential to health than municiapal vs private
Posted by: plantland on Apr 26, 2007 6:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some smaller US corporations, such as Aqua America in the Philadelphia suburbs, provide safer water to users than do neighboring municipal water suppliers in big cities. (This, despite America's premier city of Philadelphia being world famous for the Waterworks in the Eightenth Century, but now putting toxic fertilzer waste in the water because it is a cheap source of fluoride.)
So in some cases, private has meant independent. A couple of big city munipal water systems have held out agaist fluoridation- notably, Portland,OR and San Diego, CA.

Many small rural municipal water systems have also held out against fluoridation. If serving few enough households, they will be exempted from forced adulteration even if mandatory fluoridation bills pass in their home states.

Avoiding fluoiride is one of the most important things a citizen can do to protect his physical and mental health. Thus, the Fluoride Action Network called its conference the "Citizens's Conference on Fluoride". www.fluorideaction.net

Many rural small water companies are also holding out aginst mandatory fluoridation.

Keeping fluoride out of his own body can give an activist slightly more energy, for fluoride makes the thyroid sluggish, and affects glucose tolerance. If we avoid fluoride, then fluoride can't escort aluminum across our blood brain barriers. That the fluoride ion helps aluminum get into the brain is enough reason to not add it to water, since aluminum is implicted in ADD as well as Alzheimer's. Perhaps extending our useful lives as activists rather than wards of God knows whom as Alzheimers patients will be sufficient reason for Alternet readers to study up on this significnt health threat.
We need to support the EPA scientists union which wants to investigate the hidebound CDC recommendations, particularly in lieu of the 2006 report now available at the National Academy of Sciences or the Fluoride Action Group's website.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Water is the new oil.
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Apr 26, 2007 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those in elite, academic, and military circles have known about the current (and up coming/growing) water crisis and have dubbed water as the new oil for many years now. It is a major source of the 'issues' involved with Israel, Palestine, Syria, etc as well as in the former Soviet 'stan' republics. In the US major corporations and cities have been buying (often at theft prices) water from landowners and farmers for decades, especially in states where water is either scarce and/or where laws are old and not up to modern technology which makes water pumping more drastic (like in Texas.) Of course, this is no surprise considering that the government's policy for the past decades is to sell off our nation's assests to corporations and private equite groups (often even foreign owned): roads, toll ways, highways, ports, mineral/timber rights, etc. The goal is to transfer the people's assets to private corporations (often owned partially by those same politicans.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thirst is an oversimplification of a complex issue
Posted by: benpfree on Apr 26, 2007 3:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thirst and its authors as well as groups like public citizen tend to simplify what is an extremely complex issue. cities and water agencies have many choices when they are considering whether or not to contract out for all or part of their water service. There are many issues that need to be taken into account. I am neither pro nor against "privatization". What I would ask is that people who read articles like this please dig a bit deeper into the subject matter. Don't take any group's perspective as the gospel. I was part of a grad student team that took 2 years to investigate pros and cons of water privatization. you can see all our work at www.waterproject.info Please inform youself before buying into all the hype that surrounds this subject. Water is indeed precious, but so is critical thinking.
-Ben

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

there should be a law against economic terrorism
Posted by: yurbud on Apr 27, 2007 12:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and that's what privatizing water is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ecological Democracy is the Goal
Posted by: waterislifeaguaesvida on Apr 28, 2007 6:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Discussions about water planning and management that do not address the issue of adaptive governance are simply negating the politics of water and replacing it with anti-corporatism. Stakeholders, water users, have a shared fate in the consequences of the use, diversions and maintenance of stream in-flows. There are compacts with downriver states, consequences of groundwater depletions, water quality impacts from upstream polluters, and laws defining allocations that must be adhered to.

Currently, a short-cut is taken in water management and administration that needs to be changed. Water users need to have the political entities represent the users. Many water utility authorities as they exist now are not elected and are not based on distinct users. Further, there is no technical input from geohydrologists that can act as an environmental ombudsman for the resource.

Bioregional water planning is the alternative, not de-corporatization. Open input and representation of agricultural users, historical users, residential users, commercial users need to be institutionalized so that there is ecological democracy and all are aware of the impact of the decisions being made on the region. I recommend people to go to http://www.waterassembly.org to see one such fifty year water planning process. I also suggest that you address the political issue ahead of time so that your plan could be implemented by someone other than your local bureaucrats.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tragedy of the Commons
Posted by: RBStanfield on Apr 28, 2007 2:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our town, Tinicum Bucks Co, in Eastern PA has addressed this issue.

The water in our aquifers is held in "common" and our goverment, the municipality, has an ordinance that allocated this limited resouce equitably by allowing at planning the withdrawal of no more than100 gal/day/acre. This number was derived from data taken from a USGS hydrogeological study of the region.

The concept is "Thou shall not steal thy neighbors' water."

There are test procedures to demonstrate this concept with strict limits on water level drawdown in a neighborhood. We have a continuous battle to defend this position.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Big business runs the world
Posted by: Reader11722 on May 1, 2007 6:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Zionist banks and big business rule the world. After all, corporations and gov't are merely quid-pro-quo whorehouses sold to the highest bidder. When the gov't needs illegal wire-taps, Verizon and Sprint allow them secret rooms to listen in on calls. When Haliburton (and KBR) need more revenue, the gov't hands out no-bid contracts. When the gov't dislikes literature, Amazon and Wikipedia ban the book "America Deceived". We The People had our gov't (and our water) sold out from beneath us.
Final link (before Google Books caves to pressure and drops the title):
America Deceived (book)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fighting the Corporate Theft of Our Water
Posted by: pulitzer on May 12, 2007 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fighting the Corporate Theft of Our Watercheerleader babes - shaved pussy string bikini string bikini sexy bikini extreme gang bang - reviewer rated gang bang first gangbang first gang bang breast forms - united states free tranny free shemale more tracked drunk teen party - girls kissing free hardcore swingers party sex stories hollywood lesbians - lesbians fucking free movies to personal links porn videos brutal toons - anal gratuit brutal anal movies brutal deluxe GEFFEDEVS766GERTT9009ED fat tits - click here to big tits round asses porn movies other sites video gay gratis - gratuit gay movies free hardcore sex gay and lesbian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fighting the Corporate Theft of Our Water
Posted by: hesse on May 12, 2007 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fighting the Corporate Theft of Our Watererotica toon - free incest lesbian erotica submitted by sex stories free kinky - personal ads for example personal ads bondage gear transex - olivia newton reviewer rated these movies add to personal latina big tits - with big tits big natural with big tits click here to bestiality mpeg - bestiality toons animal sex movies beastiality pics bestiality movies sex toys online - passion parties for example sex toys and united states gay bareback video - free gay porn gay sex videos free movies free gay porn GEFFEDEVS766GERTT9009ED schoolgirls japan - naughty schoolgirls asian schoolgirl asian teens halloween costumes

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I support the privatization of water...
Posted by: mn on May 17, 2007 12:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...because it will never never never never happen where I live and I no longer care about anywhere else. If you get fucked by privitization, so long and good riddance. Drink the corporate water and pay the rates or die. I really don't give a shit. The less people on earth, the better off I am. I have found my bunker-town, and now it's time for the rest of you fuck-nits to disappear if you didn't have the sense god gave a worm apple to protect your ability to survive! See ya, nit buckets...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]