Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Step It Up: An Invitation to the Year's "Hottest" Action

By Bill McKibben, In These Times. Posted April 12, 2007.


On April 14, in the largest-ever demonstration against climate change, people around the country will call for the United States to reduce carbon emissions by 80 percent. So invite your friends and join the party.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Everyone's got a metaphor, and ours was the potluck dinner. If we were going to build a climate change movement, and we didn't have any money or any organization, how could we do it? We decided to throw a party. Invite our friends. Have them invite their friends. See what happened.

And you know what? It worked. On April 14, people around the country will call for the United States to "Step It Up" and reduce carbon emissions 80 percent by 2050. This will be the largest coordinated environmental protest since Earth Day 1970 heralded the onset of a new mass consciousness about the fragility of the planet's ecosystem.

This is the emergence of an actual movement against global warming, something that's been missing for the two decades we've known about this problem -- a movement that, because of the nature of the problem, will need to go deeper than environmentalism has gone before. Techno-fixes only go so far with climate change; this movement will need to take on culture, lifestyle, economics. There is no guarantee it will triumph, but it's almost certain to be interesting.

How it all began

Last summer, I found myself despairing. True, Hurricane Katrina had blown down the door and Al Gore had walked through it with An Inconvenient Truth. More people now knew about climate change than ever before. But it wasn't changing the politics of the issue.

In Washington, Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), the chair of the Subcommittee on Clean Air, Climate Change and Nuclear Safety, said global warming was a "giant hoax." In a July 2006 interview with the Tulsa World, he compared environmentalists with Nazis and their use of "the Big Lie." "You say something over and over and over and over again, and people will believe it, and that's [the environmentalists'] strategy," he said. "Everything on which they based their story, in terms of the facts, has been refuted scientifically."

I had been writing and speaking about global warming since 1989, when The End of Nature, my first book on the subject, came out and was serialized in the New Yorker. But I was struck by how little those of us who cared had accomplished -- Americans have continued to increase their carbon emissions about a percentage point each and every year. Meanwhile, the scientific evidence was increasingly dire, the degradation of the earth's physical systems accelerating.

In my despair, I called a couple of old friends who live near me in Vermont. "Why don't we walk up to Burlington?" I asked. "We can sit in at the federal building and get ourselves arrested, and maybe it will make a little noise in the newspaper, and at least we'll have done something."

They were good friends, so they agreed to go. But one of them bothered to actually call up to the Burlington Police department, only to find out that in that mellow outpost there was no chance we'd get arrested. They'd let us sit there on the steps forever. Maybe if we set something on fire we'd get the attention we sought -- but, oh, think of the carbon emissions!

Anyway, we decided to convert our little tantrum into something a bit nobler: a march, or, better yet -- a climate change pilgrimage. We'd march on the shoulder of the two-lane highway; we'd hold meetings every night on town greens; we'd camp in farmers' fields along the way. And so we started asking people if they wanted to join us.

In early August, a team of Middlebury students started doing the down-and-dirty, where's-the-porta-potty type of organizing. On Aug. 31, we stepped off from Robert Frost's old writing cabin in the Green Mountains. There were 300 of us that first day. Five days and 49 miles later, when we reached Burlington, we'd grown to 1,000, an impressive turnout in the nation's second smallest state.

This was enough to change the dynamics of the issue. Everyone running for Vermont's open Senate and House seats, from socialist Senate candidate Rep. Bernie Sanders to his right wing opponent, Vermont's richest man, Richie Tarrant, publicly endorsed legislation sponsored by then-Sen. James Jeffords (I-Vt.) that calls for 80 percent cuts in emissions by 2050 -- the most ambitious climate change legislation yet proposed on Capitol Hill. It reminded us that you don't need 51 percent of the people supporting something -- you just need an organized group of people who really care.

But here's the shocking part. The newspapers said that the thousand people we'd assembled was the largest gathering that had ever happened in the United States about global warming. Yes, you read that right. Global warming is arguably the biggest problem we now face, and almost nobody in the United States had done anything political about it.

Not because people didn't care: Everyone we asked to march said yes. It's that no one had ever asked them before. The climate change movement is peculiar. It has scientists and engineers and economists, all of the wonderful superstructure that a movement requires, but no mass mobilization to support them. That's what we need to change.

Observers have always said that an uprising about climate was unlikely because few Americans were direct victims (yet) and all of us were in some sense beneficiaries of cheap fossil fuel. But what the march in Vermont told us was that the times had changed.

Building a movement

In the months that followed, a few of us -- me and six newly minted Middlebury grads -- began trying to outline a national action. We considered a march on Washington -- but, once again, the carbon emissions!

Our experience in Vermont helped us understand how powerful it was to speak to our senators and representatives in their districts. So we hatched a plan: We would get people to stage rallies in the places they lived, or the places they loved, on the same day. Not Earth Day, April 22, because we didn't want to step on the inspiring work people were already doing for that day. Instead, we'd start the weekend before, as a kind of lead-up -- and as a reminder that we need more than one day a year to think about the planet.

Those actions would take place in city parks and on church steps. And some would be staged in truly iconic places, which would remind anyone who heard about them of what was at stake. We raised enough money to build our rudimentary Web site, and then, in mid-January, started sending out e-mails. Our fondest hope? That by April 14 there might be a couple of hundred rallies scheduled around the country.

I'm writing these words on March 15. After 10 weeks of organizing, we have more than 900 Step It Up rallies scheduled, a number that increases by the hour.

What happened? We merely sent out invitations to a potluck. But people, desperate to do something, anything, to start stemming the tide of the coming environmental disaster, responded with not only their heads, but their hearts and hands.

Who is stepping up?

First to step up have been the national environmental groups. There's been a lot of talk in recent years about "the death of environmentalism" and the big dinosaur green groups. Some people complained they had turned into mere fundraising machines, or become captives of the Beltway.

But that is simply not true. The Sierra Club, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the National Wildlife Federation, among many others, have all committed real efforts to organizing Step It Up rallies, engaging regular people rather than just making technocratic recommendations.

Local environmental groups too -- the wonderful stew of "Save the _____" groups that have done such powerful work over the years -- understand that the future of the places they love can't be guaranteed by them alone. Raise the temperature a few degrees, bring the ocean a few feet higher, and the bay/swamp/forest is going to be wrecked no matter what.

But it's not simply traditional environmental groups who have joined the cause. Churches have responded in impressive numbers as well. A founder of the Evangelical Environment Network, Cal DeWitt, forwarded our appeal around that thriving web of seminaries and colleges. The Christian Century, the magazine of mainline Protestantism, put a big story on the cover. Sojourners, the radically engaged gospel mission, sent out an e-mail appeal. And in late February, we heard from a seventh grader who was planning on turning his big bar mitzvah bash into a Step It Up rally. Mazel tov!

But the response that has moved us the most has come from students. Those who think college campuses are dens of apathy and sloth must take note: There's a movement emerging across the nation's high school and college campuses, and the politics of climate are at its center.

Energy Action, a coalition of more than 30 campus groups, endorsed Step It Up. The fruits of their labor were apparent one day when a digital photo arrived from the Alpha Phi sorority chapter at the University of Texas at Austin: 180 broadly smiling co-eds behind a big Step It Up banner. "We wanted to show it wasn't just hippies who cared," they wrote.

Athletes and other outdoors types have stepped up too. In Florida, scuba divers started organizng an underwater rally on a coral reef near Key West -- a reef that won't be there in a few decades if the warming continues. In Wyoming, skiers plan a four-day trip down the state's highest mountain, Gannett Peak, including a descent of Dinwoody Glacier, which is rapidly melting. Rock climbers will hang banners from Seneca Rocks in West Virginia.

Activists in half a dozen coastal cities plan to paint blue stripes along the streets where the new tide line will be in a warmer world. In Petaluma, Calif., they will mark with yellow tape what would be the high water mark of the Petaluma River should sea levels rise an estimated 6 to 22 feet due to climate change. In Manhattan's East Village, Girls Gone Green is going to team up with Reverend Billy's Church of Stop Shopping and march up to Central Park.

Others plan to converge on bikes in city centers. In San Francisco, hybrid cars will parade across the Golden Gate Bridge. In New Orleans, citizens will rally along the levees. Seniors in retirement communities, elementary school kids, you name them, they are involved.

Aerial artists are working out ways for protesters to spell out the message with their bodies. In fact, 800 school kids in Park City already have spelled out "Step It Up" against the Utah snow so we could photograph it for our Web site.

Photographers have volunteered to provide arresting images, which we'll be webcasting before the day is over. And then there are the musicians: Working with MUSE/Cool the Planet, we've found songwriters aplenty who are writing new tunes. (There's even a Step It Up anthem from the Gallerists on the Web site.) All of this is music to our ears as history shows that movements that sing are movements that win.

And we need to win. We've wasted the last two decades. The scientific evidence now tells us that we can't wait any longer. We have to send Congress and our state and local legislators a message that is so clear and so unavoidable that they have to sit up and pay attention.

The message needs to be heard by corporate leaders, small business owners and everyone in between that this is a matter that will affect everyone's bottom line in the years ahead. Reducing carbon emissions by 80 percent by 2050 is a minimal demand scientifically. It may be the maximum that's politically feasible right now, but we're just laying the groundwork for what's going to be a long campaign.

Come April 14, we'll have what's most important -- a real in-the-streets movement that's able to grow and build, able to buttress the scientific and economic case for change with real political clout. We hope our particular goal is simple enough for people to rally around, strong enough to begin meeting the scientific challenge, and specific enough to keep Congress members from simply making sweet, reassuring noises about climate change.

Most of all, we hope we are helping midwife that necessary network of people who understand that once you change the light bulb, you have to go and change the law, and that to change the law, you have to change the conversation.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: global warming, climate change, stepitup2007, bill mckibben

Bill McKibben is the author of "The End of Nature" and "Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Airplanes, Motorboats
Posted by: Artkansas on Apr 12, 2007 7:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And presumeably cars seem to be used in this protest.

Amusing.

If there is one nearby, I might join, but I'll pedal there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 12, 2007 7:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In my despair, I called a couple of old friends who live near me in Vermont. "Why don't we walk up to Burlington?" I asked. "We can sit in at the federal building and get ourselves arrested, and maybe it will make a little noise in the newspaper, and at least we'll have done something."

They were good friends, so they agreed to go. But one of them bothered to actually call up to the Burlington Police department, only to find out that in that mellow outpost there was no chance we'd get arrested. They'd let us sit there on the steps forever. Maybe if we set something on fire we'd get the attention we sought -- but, oh, think of the carbon emissions!"

Not that I am endorsing breaking the law.. but you already state here that such was your intention... as was getting arrested... but Bill... bricks don't cause carbon emissions.

Or maybe you should have looked into the ecological impact of glass etching compounds. You want to get arrested??? Start thinking outside of the box just a tiny bit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How much does the party cost?
Posted by: edith on Apr 12, 2007 10:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everybody should like a party.

In particular, this party may be for necessary action. This action will require sacrifice.

The party invitation is a bit vague on that key item, however.

A sincere invitation should state

how many jobs will be lost by 80% deduction in emissions?

what will be the effect on the takehome pay of workers making below median wages?

if the US effects 80% reduction, and China and India effect no reductons or very little within the same time period set for the US reduction, what will be the economic effect on the US?

What in particular will be the effect on US agriculture and the abiltiy of the US to feed itself?

To maintain the nearly full employment and steady capital investment in US business, what substitutes will be able to run power plants, factories, large office buildings and complexes and meet increased consumer demand for power by the time that the 80% reduction takes place?

Maybe the party should be postponed until we know what the h we are doing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Can we wait that long? nm Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Long on "awarenessing", short on ideas.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Apr 12, 2007 11:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gather, protest, march, whine about reducing carbon emissions by 80%. Fine. I'm all for you setting your target carbon emissions.

Now, unless you've got some useful, practical, electable ideas for doing so, you're just whistling Dixie...and spewing CO2 due to your increased respiratory rate while decrying anything approaching modern lifestyles.

Here's a thought, instead of burning up that CO2 with chants and sing-a-longs, put those neurons to work and go get the graduate degree in engineering or the physical sciences. Find better alternatives for energy. That way, instead of marching against Grandma Nellie who only wants to be warm in the winter, you can entice 'Ma Nellie to march to you for your gee-whiz method of producing warmth in the dead of winter.

Nah. Whining about the problem is ever easier than finding solutions. Set your targets...

...And miss them, for the sake of all the old people in the U.S. who want to be warm, for all the kids who need a boiler room in their schools, and all the evil laborers, evil business people, evil academics, and evil engineers who want to make evil tires, sell evil computers, do evil cancer research, and build evil bridges, evilly, respectively.

Well, slothful and righteous fundies, I bid you have a nice shout, that you may get whatever it is you need to get off your chest to elevate your awareness.

Just stay the feck off my lawn while I'm at work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I appreciate... Posted by: ABetterFuture
There's an elephant in the room...
Posted by: clint_in_colorado on Apr 12, 2007 3:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe in the idea that global warming is the biggest threat to humanity. I want to save the planet. I love the rivers and mountains and snow here in Colorado where I live. I don't want to lose this precious gift we have been given. I vote, think, and live progressively.

An 80% reduction in carbon emissions sounds wonderful! I agree! Let's do it! How do we get started?

If we really want to change, let's start by saying what an 80% reduction in emissions actually means instead of being abstract about it. An 80% reduction in carbon emissions is not possible without a TOTAL and FUNDAMENTAL reorganization of our society and the infrastructure that underpins it. All of it.

80% is not everyone giving up their SUV for a hybrid vehicle. Its more like half of us giving up our vehicle altogether and the other half driving 75% less than they do now.

80% is not going to the farmer's market on summer weekends. Its more like giving up the transportation networks that provide us with fresh apples and strawberries in the winter. Its going back to a world where we eat what is in season and only those things that are produced somewhere nearby where we live. Bye-bye Washington apples! Bye-bye California strawberries!

80% is giving up our daily feast of fresh meats and moving toward a more vegetable-oriented diet that requires less industrial power to support.

80% is giving up air travel. Period.

80% is turning off the TV, game consoles, dishwashers, washing machines, cellphones, and all of the power consuming devices that make our lives what they are.

80% is consuming less, MUCH LESS, of every single thing we take for granted today. Less clothes, less shopping, less food, less soap, less water, less plastic, less gasoline, less electricity, less heat, less air conditioning, less empty space, less entertainment, less driving, less, less, less of everything.

80% means we cannot have 4000 square foot homes with vaulted ceilings and walls of windows for families of 4 people.

80% means a world so much different from this one, that we would not recognize it.

And that is where the crux of the problem really is. We need to change our BEHAVIOR, not out technology. And the government will never advocate that kind of change. The people will not vote for it and society-at-large will not support it.

I am reminded of a radio interview I heard recently. Some country musician was bragging that she was taking action to tackle global warming. She was switching from her gas-powered Ford Expedition to one that burns bio-diesel. What an amazing sacrifice! She was not driving less or driving smaller. Just burning fry grease instead of gas. That is not 80%, not even close.

Do I think a world with less would be a bad one? I don't. But we better figure out how to get there fast because the one thing we have less and less of each day is time...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Auction in Aspen Posted by: edith
Look for me guys!!!
Posted by: dikaiosyne on Apr 12, 2007 3:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll be the guy cruising to the march in my Lincoln Navigator. You can recognize me as the guy with the NRA hat and the American flag posted prominently on the vehicle and waving at you all with the raised middle finger while laughing uncontrolably as I see however many of you global warming cultists freezing your asses off during the second coldest April on record. You still have the right to make asses of yourselves but I think you should all get some professional help for the GOREBAL WARMING hysteria you seem to be suffering from. Then again you are entertaining so I am not so keen on you getting the help you so desperately need.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What next, ban the Sun?
Posted by: dayahka on Apr 12, 2007 4:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why the continuing delusion (beliefs held falsely)? Why this fantasy, this scam, this fraud? What are you going to do next, protest against the Sun? Ask NASA to stop volcanoes? Tell the Earth to stop making wind and rain?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You Expect them to Stop??
Posted by: gellero on Apr 12, 2007 5:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that there is no concrete proof that HUMANS significantly contribute to global warming doesn't mean anything to these folks. There's a lot of money to be made, academic grants to be recieved, and hey, when you're in college, the best place to find chicks and get laid was at 'the protest march' !!....
There are plenty of explainations out there. Global Warming Stuff

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Read it again Posted by: gellero
Now, if we can only move beyond the posturing...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 12, 2007 7:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There certainly are a lot of these events planned, and that's a good thing - but you can bet that local politicians will be showing up, hoping to gain a few points with the electorate - but ask them if they'll transfer their country road budgets to electric train systems, or their bloated water department contracts to solar panels for government buildings, and you'll see some "oh shit" expressions - ask them if they'll mandate the replacement of diesel buses with biodiesel buses, for example.

Putting lipstick on a dead pig doesn't make it any more appealing... so just do your best to make sure that these 'green events' don't simply turn into 'greenwashing events'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

be practical
Posted by: richholland on Apr 13, 2007 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
thanks to the Co2hysteria nowadays in WesternEurope we can travel by luxury train to many countries at prices lower than the bare gasoline costs for your car.

Important is that even if the traincompany is a corporation main shareholders are the State and sometimes Tradeunions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: be practical Posted by: edith
» BRAIN POWER Posted by: gellero
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement