Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Environment

Global Warming Hits Southwest

By Mike Davis, TheNation.com. Posted April 16, 2007.


The Arctic is not the only theater of unequivocal climate change and polar bears aren't the only heralds of a new age of chaos. Global warming is already affecting the U.S.
041707story
041707story
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The polar bear on its shrinking ice floe has become the urgent icon of global warming and runaway climate change. Even the flat-earther in the White House now concedes that the magnificent bears may be doomed to extinction as the sea ice melts and the Arctic Ocean is transformed into open blue water for the first time in millions of years. Humanity's "great geophysical experiment," as the oceanographer Roger Revelle long ago characterized the steeply rising curve of carbon dioxide emission, has knocked nature off its Holocene foundations in the circumpolar lands.

But the Arctic is not the only theater of spectacular and unequivocal climate change, nor are the polar bears the only heralds of a new age of chaos. Consider, for example, some of Ursus maritimus's distant relatives: the black bears that forage happily but ominously in the fabled Chisos Mountains of Texas's Big Bend National Park. They may be the messengers of an environmental transformation in the Borderlands almost as radical as that taking place in Alaska or Greenland.

While hiking en route to Emory Peak on a preternaturally warm day in January 2002, with my mind still haunted by the apocalyptic images of the previous September, I made the nodding acquaintance of an antic and harmless young bear in a trail camp. Apparitions of bears are always slightly magical, and I presumed the encounter was an affirmation of a still largely unspoiled wilderness. In fact, as I was startled to learn from a ranger the next day, the young bear was, so to speak, a mojado -- the offspring of recent undocumented immigrants from the other side of the Rio Grande.

Black bears had been common in the Chisos when it was the quasi-mythical redoubt of Mescalero Apache and Comanche raiders in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, but ranchers relentlessly hunted them to extinction in the early twentieth century. Then, almost miraculously in the early 1980s, bears reappeared amid the madrone and pine of Emory Peak. Astonished wildlife biologists surmised that the bears had migrated from the Sierra del Carmen in Coahuila, swimming the Rio Grande and crossing forty miles of furnace-hot desert to reach the Chisos, a promised land of docile deer and abundant garbage.

Like the jaguars that have re-established themselves in the border mountains of Arizona in recent years or, for that matter, the blood-sucking chupacabra of norteño folklore who has reputedly been seen in the suburbs of Los Angeles, the black bears are part of an epic migration of wildlife as well as people al otro lado. Although no one knows exactly why the bears, big cats and legendary vampires are moving northward, one plausible hypothesis is that they are adjusting their ranges and populations to a new reign of drought in northern Mexico and the US Southwest.

The human case is clear-cut: Abandoned ranchitos and near-ghost towns throughout Coahuila, Chihuahua and Sonora testify to the relentless succession of dry years -- beginning in the 1980s but assuming truly catastrophic intensity in the late 1990s -- that has pushed hundreds of thousands of poor rural people toward the sweatshops of Ciudad Juárez and the barrios of Los Angeles.

In some years, "exceptional drought" has engulfed the entire Plains from Canada to Mexico; in other years, crimson conflagrations on weather maps have crept down the Gulf Coast to Louisiana or crossed the Rockies to the interior Northwest. But the semipermanent epicenters have remained the basins of the Colorado and Rio Grande rivers, as well as northern Mexico.

By 2003, for example, Lake Powell had fallen by nearly eighty feet in three years, and crucial reservoirs along the Rio Grande were barely more than mud puddles. The Southwestern winter of 2005-06, meanwhile, was one of the driest on record, and Phoenix went 143 days without a single drop of rain. Rare interruptions in the drought, like the Noachian monsoon of last summer (parts of El Paso received an incredible thirty inches of rain), have been insufficient to adequately recharge aquifers or refill reservoirs, and in 2006 both Arizona and Texas reported the worst drought losses to crops and herds in history (about $7 billion altogether).

Persistent drought, like melting ice, rapidly reorganizes ecosystems and transforms entire landscapes. Without sufficient moisture to produce protective sap, millions of acres of pinyon and ponderosa pine have been ravaged by plagues of bark beetles; these dead forests, in turn, have helped to kindle the firestorms that have burst into the suburbs of Los Angeles, San Diego, Phoenix and Denver, as well as destroyed part of Los Alamos. In Texas the grasslands have also burned -- nearly 2 million acres in 2006 alone -- and as topsoil blows away, prairies are reverting to desert.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: global warming, climate change

Mike Davis is author, most recently, of the kids' adventure, 'Land of the Lost Mammoths' (Perceval Press, 2003) and co-author of 'Under the Perfect Sun: the San Diego Tourists Never See' (New Press, 2003). He is currently working on a book about the recent political earthquake in California, 'Heavy Metal Freeway' (to be published by Metropolitan Books).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The party's over. . .
Posted by: monkeywrench on Apr 16, 2007 7:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . .but we refuse to admit it. We all keep watering that most useless feature of home ownership, the lawn. We continue to build and use those timeless symbols of the affluent lifestyle, golf courses. We insist, even in the face of some of the most threatening information ever, on our "right" to deliberately dump potable water into the ground or down a storm drain to prove that we are wealthy enough to be wasteful.

Dept. of Water and Power in Los Angeles is seriously considering capturing rainwater and storing it in vast underground reservoirs they have yet to build. What they know is what they have not told their customers yet: That the days of cheap, abundant water are over. We had better make sure that we understand that they are over –– or we are over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The party's over. . . Posted by: richholland
» RE: The party's over. . . Posted by: Mr. Heathen
» RE: The party's over. . . Posted by: Kitty Lady Oregon
Liquid Gold
Posted by: edith on Apr 17, 2007 1:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it takes climate change to put rational economics into effect in the Southwest, fine. Water never should have been "cheap" there in the first place. As for the "proto-fascists", what ever a proto anything is, there still are seperage governments for Mexico and the US, and people cannot travel to the other's nation without proper documentation. Why Mexicans want to come to an area where living costs will rocket, I don't know. When the Chinese pull the plug on our other "drought", the trade deficit, the jobs Mexicans do in the US will dry up. If the Mexicans think that the illegal portion of their population will get welfare, they are insane. Denying intruders welfare is not protofascism. Mexico has a strict immigration policy of its own, and it is hardly in a position to lecture the US on anything, from immigration to human rights.

Hopefully the ariditiy of the land will lead to the rapid reduction of population of this beautiful area which never was meant to support so many people, Mexican or American. That is Nature's environment policy, unless guilty liberals screw that up too by paying Mexicans to stay on US soil that is depleted and cannot support mass urbanization or mass agriculture. If that is proto-fascism, so what.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Liquid Gold Posted by: richholland
» RE: Liquid Gold Posted by: patszar
» Group Hug Posted by: edith
» RE: Liquid Gold Posted by: mincemeat
» RE: Liquid Gold Posted by: jmp3954
And in the Midwest...
Posted by: BJT on Apr 17, 2007 5:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We just had one of the worst springtime cold spells in memory. It has destroyed crops and will negatively impact the economy for the rest of the year.

I think we should leave our cars running all day this week to make sure it never happens again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And in the Midwest... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: And in the Midwest... Posted by: CriminallySane
» RE: And in the Midwest... Posted by: oregoncharles
» False dichotomy! Posted by: CriminallySane
» RE: And in the Midwest... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» No, you're being a troll. Posted by: CriminallySane
» RE: No, you're being a troll. Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: And in the Midwest... Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: And in the Midwest... Posted by: astudent
what about humidifiers?
Posted by: gotmyeyeonyou on Apr 17, 2007 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
no i don't know a damn about the scientific side of this argument, but why can't people get water out of the air in the south? my parents have to get out the humidifier every summer to keep our basement from breaking out in mold and that machine puts out about 2 gallons a day in charlotte, nc. can some of the more bio/science/tech folks out there explain why some cheap ass engine can produce some serious water on a daily baisis and you guys continue to miss this resource?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: what about humidifiers? Posted by: LeaderofMen
» man this is one house dude!!!!!! Posted by: gotmyeyeonyou
» RE: what about humidifiers? Posted by: CriminallySane
» RE: what about humidifiers? Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: what about humidifiers? Posted by: Kitty Lady Oregon
reup
Posted by: gotmyeyeonyou on Apr 17, 2007 6:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this is not some kind of singular situation type arrangement, quite a few of the houses in this area and i'm sure throughout this part of the country, including those w/out full basements must maintain their humidity levels in the summer and that is a rich source of water, why has this never been considered or has it and am i just some random dumbass?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» i hate replying to my own shit Posted by: gotmyeyeonyou
» RE: reup Posted by: oregoncharles
Coachella Valley
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Apr 17, 2007 6:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live part time in the Coachella Valley - the desert just east of the San Jacinto Mountains in Socal.

There, we have several layers of aquifers that supplement the water we get from the CO river. There are over 100 golf courses out there. Virtually everyone has a pool. Jesus, I have a pool, too. People indiscriminately water their lawns (we're in a desert, for god's sake). Often times, you will see broken sprinkler heads spewing water into the street or onto the sidewalk or onto the driveway. Spewing water in the middle of the day - but not onto the grass or the intended plant(s).

Year before last in the summer we had about 90 days of straight 100+ days. Last year we had a month more of them. I dread what this year brings despite loving the hot dry climate. Last week was the first measurable rainfall since July of LAST year. Okay, we normally only get 3" of rain in a year, but the rains aren't supposed to bypass us in the wintertime. They did this last winter.

We're sucking the aquifer far faster than it can be sustained despite CO river water (and the snows in the watershed are becoming non-existent, thus beginning to limit our share so far south), not limiting consumption, not even calling for conservation - no city councilman in any of the desert communities will call for such - and the All American Canal can carry only so much water.

I'm looking forward to retiring out there because I love the desert. But now I'm wondering if that was such a good idea.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sailing Down the Strip Posted by: edith
» RE: Sailing Down the Strip Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
Catastrophic climate change is no surprise to me.
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 17, 2007 6:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ten years ago, I wrote a science fiction novel titled "The Last UFO." After several days of research, I described global warming in a middle chapter this way:

Unless there was a reversal of the heating trend, both polar ice caps would melt, flooding coastline communities around the world. Evidence of the trend was particularly dramatic in Antarctica where average regional temperatures had risen 4.5 degrees Fahrenheit since 1947, when Athenian transporters [UFOs] first began taking measurements.

Furthermore, orbital gravity scans by the Poseidon [a UFO] indicated that the Larsen B ice shelf, a sheet in Antarctica the size of Connecticut and up to a half-mile thick, was nearing the limits of its stability. Just last month, an imaging mission showed that part of the shelf had broken off in January. Twenty-five miles long and three miles wide, the separated area was larger than the total amount lost by the Larsen shelf over the past two decades.

In the same chapter, two main characters discuss global warning. Asks one person, “Have you seen the movie, ‘Water World,’ with Kevin Costner?”

“Yeah, I saw it last year. The ice caps melted and completely flooded the Earth. Are you telling me that will happen someday?”

“Yes and no. The ice caps are disappearing and that won’t stop, but dry land will still exist. The problem is, the useable amount would have humans living on it like ants in colonies, only more crowded with little room for agriculture. There will be constant wars for food and fresh water. The mass killings would make the Holocaust seem insignificant.”

That information was old news in 1997 -- just like droughts, water wars and mass starvation might become sooner than we think.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ..insignificant as well as a damn good scam! Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» Not to mention... Posted by: Wassermann
» RE: Not to mention... Posted by: richholland
my bad
Posted by: gotmyeyeonyou on Apr 17, 2007 6:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i just live on a street where idiots pump water down the street everday, it is a constant flow. don't believe me, roll down sherwood ave, charlotte, nc and look for the water running down both sides of the the side of the road 24/7. some idiot just built a mcmansion on top of a spring and will now pump the water in front of everone's house for eternity. yes that fool has a pvc pipe coming out of his basement running straight to the street. why isnt this water used for something?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bogus crap!
Posted by: dikaiosyne on Apr 17, 2007 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Man made Gorebal Warming.....It's totally bogus. No doubt there is global warming but its caused by solar activity as opposed to liberals breathing and farting too much. I love how this article points out all the areas where there is climatic change going on and ignores other areas where the artic ice is thickening and where its actually gotten much colder including right here in the good old US of A. Coldest Damn April on record in the northeast US. Guess one of you is going to demonstrate how even the cold weather is caused by GOREBAL Warming? As for the drier southeast US. I own a home in Las Vegas and water is fairly expensive but there is no talk of water shortages and the Las Vegas region actually had a period last October where it rained for an entire day. Got more rain in one day than they've seen in 100 years. That was only 6 months ago. The rain they got almost equaled the annual average amounts. The neighbors were saying that it seemed to them that that area was actually wetter and a bit colder than in previous years. I havent been to the Hoover dam or lake Mead since 2004 when the levels were really down but I have heard thats it is nowhere as of much concern recently. You Gorebal Warming folks really need to find yourselves a new religion to follow because what you believe in now just ain't cutting it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bogus crap! Posted by: Tran1992
» RE: Bogus crap! Posted by: CriminallySane
» RE: Bogus crap! Posted by: jroth420
» RE: Bogus crap! Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Bogus crap! Posted by: aethr
» Suck my balls. Posted by: James T. Swaggart
» Coldest Damn April on record Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: Bogus crap! Posted by: particle
» Don't feed the troll Posted by: geoff_canuck
The remedy could be easy
Posted by: BeeGee on Apr 17, 2007 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This sentence, like similar others, took me aback:

"Humanity's 'great geophysical experiment,' as the oceanographer Roger Revelle long ago characterized the steeply rising curve of carbon dioxide emission, has knocked nature off its Holocene foundations in the circumpolar lands."

To think of carbon dioxide as a horrible pollutant is absurd. It is simply the equivalent of oxygen for plants. Animals and people exhale CO2, plants inhale it and exhale oxygen (O2) for people and plants to inhale. If CO2 is the cause of global warming, then mankind simply needs to stop destroying the Amazon rainforest and old forests everywhere, not to mention all those gorgeous California orchards that have been uprooted for housing tracts. Plant trees -- trees for shade, timber, fuel, fruit and nuts!! They use much less water than housing tracts and golf courses and they're actually good for something -- besides transforming CO2 to O2.
This one's really a no-brainer, folks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The remedy could be easy Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: The remedy could be easy Posted by: shanaza
fucktards, look for solutions not complaints
Posted by: gotmyeyeonyou on Apr 17, 2007 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
yeah, we know you live in a water wasting part of the US, aka the US. stop bitching and come up with something b/c the world has so much water that we can play with it for eternity if we manage it right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Who you calling fucktard, fucktard? Posted by: James T. Swaggart
» Fixed water supply. Posted by: CriminallySane
Global Climate Change is REAL - Deal with it!
Posted by: Aimee on Apr 17, 2007 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now is the time to CONSERVE and CHANGE OUR LIFESTYLES. Swimming pools and watering lawns should be OUTLAWED. Ice is melting worldwide.

Where do you think water comes from? I live on an island ... we are dependent on rainfall for our water. And yet, developers are still coming in and building more and more homes, condos, etc. Trees are being removed for development. INSANE.

Wake up. Now is the time to conserve. Although I personally believe that the party's over. Our lifestyles will change whatever we do.

"We are all children of the Great Spirit, we all belong to Mother Earth. Our planet is in great trouble and if we keep carrying old grudges and do not work together, we will all die." - CHIEF SEATTLE

Cheers,
Aimee
DataOptions.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

you love the desert?
Posted by: karyse on Apr 17, 2007 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you have a lawn? I was always amazed when I lived out in Arizona by people who moved there and instead of maintaining a desert environment (cactus, dirt, rocks) they kept their "lawn" flooded all summer. This is particularly ludicrous since no one was ever outside.

Actually, I'm continually amazed (no matter where in this country I lived) by people who have to have a lawn instead of just mowing whatever might be growing (if you must) and then they poisoned themselves and their lawns to kill perfectly edible plants such as the dandelion. Yes, yes, when a dandelion is young, its tender leaves makes a great salad. All parts of a dandelion can be used for human consumption (well maybe not the seeds -- though I can't say for sure).

I'm coming to the conclusion that Americans are just stupid. What kind of people poison themselves getting rid of edible plants?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Climate change by the U.S. Government
Posted by: saywhat on Apr 17, 2007 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A method of modifying the weather, U.S. patent number 6315213 was filed November 13, 2001. This describes an alarming procedure. A Wright Patterson Air Force scientist stated at the time, that the planes are spraying barium salt, polymer fibers, aluminum oxide and other chemicals into the atmosphere to modify the weather and for military communications purposes. The patent specifically states: “The polymer is dispersed into the cloud and the wind of the storm agitates the mixture causing the polymer to absorb the rain. This reaction forms a gelatinous substance which precipitate to the surface below. Thus, diminishing the cloud’s ability to rain.” During this same time period the Saturday Review stated that a CIA report indicated that the U.S. government had the ability to massively manipulate the weather for war purposes. The jet chemtrail grid patterns now seen throughout the United States and the world are very likely this technology applied for weather modification and military purposes.
I live in New Mexico. We have the chemtrails overhead four days out of seven.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sounds like an episode of the X-Files Posted by: MartianBachelor
» Chemtrails Posted by: CriminallySane
» Chemtrails = BS Posted by: CriminallySane
Water is just one symptom of our conspicuous consumption lifestyle.
Posted by: Sojourner on Apr 17, 2007 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Club of Rome told us back in the early '70s that the Earth's resources were not unlimited. I don't know how much human population has increased since then, but it is clear that no one is listening to the facts about the future.

The studies of the decimation of the population on Easter Island show how our species can fail to live in harmony with our environment and consequently die back. Our Earth is an island or a spaceship.

While macbre, I find it interesting that, like lemmings, we do what everyone else is doing rather than what is good. No wonder they call it a rat race.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Climate change in Maryland?
Posted by: BobS on Apr 17, 2007 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hello: I grew up in Maryland and lived there until the 1970's when I moved to the Great Lakes region. In 2005 I went back to see some of my favorite childhood creeks and forests.

When I went to visit a creek where I had built mud dams, floated toy boats and caught tadpoles, I was shocked to see that it was completely overgrown with kudzu. I had always associated that noxious vine with the Deep South.

Drowning polar bears, migrating Mexican black bears and kudzu vine? It sure looks like climate change to me.

Bob Simpson

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If there's one thing were lacking, it's gotta be golf courses . . .
Posted by: MAD on Apr 17, 2007 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More golf courses please!! And when you build my new McMansion next to a golf course in the middle of the desert, could you please lay down about 3 acres of Kentucky Bluegrass and plant non-native trees and shrubs. Forget that responsible xeriscape crap. I want a lawn so big I need a John Deere to mow it. hahahahaha

If there's one thing this country is missing, it's more golf courses (and possibly defense contractors). We must lay out at least 5000K more so elitist assholes have more options when indulging their stupid, pointless addiction. And anyone who knows a golfer knows that he or she is generally a vacuous shit for brains who can't think past their new set of Pings. Time for little boys and girls to put away the clubs and childish dreams of being the next Tiger or Annika and move on to adult things like xeriscape, fuel efficient cars and picking someone other than a homicidal maniac for president on the next go round . . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Creative Water Sources
Posted by: LarryGroff on Apr 17, 2007 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clearly the best way to get more water for the Southwest is to conserve. Stop watering and growing lawns, outlaw golf courses with grass lawns, recycle/reuse of gray water in large urban areas, reconsider the types of water intensive agriculture that is grown in the desert, better management of irrigation and many other ways to significantly save water. Of course, most of these solutions are political suicide for politicians - so don't hold your breath.

More likely we will see insanely expensive ways to get new sources of water - that won't require significant changes to our lifestyles, except how we spend our money.

"Creative" water sources like lassoing ice burgs and shipping them to the Southwest, putting fresh water (from Canada) in enormous specially designed plastic bags and then tow them
with tug boats to the Southwest. Other likely options will be building new canals/irrigation from Northwest water sources over thousands of miles. Or perhaps nuclear-powered or solar powered desalination plants to convert sea water to fresh water.

My guess is that people, or at least rich people, will find ways around the water shortages. It will no doubt prove to be disastrously expensive, short-sighted and stupid. But at least we will be consistent!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More good reasons to ban new coal-fired power plants in the US
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 17, 2007 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though it looks like persistent drought is already a reality -a and it's not just the SouthWest, there's sub-saharan Africa, Australia, Indonesia, western China - all drying out - and the mountain glaciers that provide fresh water in Tibet, the Andes, India, Mexico, etc. are all melting away - meaning no water in the summer for lots of people. At the same time, rising sea levels mean that people will have to migrate from the coasts and small islands - imagine millions of people on the move all over the world; a hundred Darfurs and Iraqs all at once.

Combine that with water mismanagement, energy-expensive schemes like desalination (read: California: water privatization in disguise) and rivers that are sucked dry before they reach the ocean (the Colorado). Another good example is the Soviet-era disaster region of the Aral Sea, once the 4-largest body of freshwater on the planet, now a polluted desert. The combination of bad water policy and global warming doesn't look to good.

This goes to show that both 'capitalist' and 'socialist' countries have committed monumental blunders in the name of short-term expansion and profitability; free-market solutions won't result in the end of fossil fuel emissions, and government planning alone creates disasters. The inability of the free market to respond to global warming is seen in the Arctic, where companies are rushing to find oil in the ice-free waters, and in the rest of the world, where water corporations are rushing to buy up scarce water supplies.

Thus, government should pass laws restricting CO2 emissions and should provide incentives and subsidies for energy conservation and renewable energy industries.

Banning new coal plants would also reduce the air pollution all across the American Southwest as well - arsenic, mercury and sulfur dioxide, for example. All across the region, people are going to have to learn to use far less water, and energy will only get more expensive - too expensive to be used for desalination. However, Southwestern politics are pretty much in the grip of fossil fuel and electric utility interests, who don't want to have to invest their profits in new and expensive CO2-free technology - which is why government regulation is needed - but that process is controlled by the politicians who are owned by the fossil fuel interests - Enron&Bush, Halliburton&Cheney, Chevron&Rice, Exxon&Delay - which is why the US political system never ratified the Kyoto Protocol.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you think of Earth as a giant spacecraft, global warming makes sense.
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 17, 2007 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the Sun constantly warming our planet along with meteorites, volcanoes, slash-and-burn agriculture, power plants and fossil-fuel machines, how is excess heat supposed to escape into outer space?

ANSWER: By radiation only, but as the atmosphere becomes more polluted, natural cooling lessens. Take jetliner contrails, for example, and the result of every aircraft in the U.S. being grounded for three days after 9/11.

For the first time in decades, satellite photos taken during that period showed crystal clear skies above the North America. Surprisingly to climatologists who expected little temperature change, there was a sudden difference of 4°F between daily highs and nightly lows without contrails present.

“It’s obviously a significant effect,” said atmospheric scientist Andrew Carleton. "In crowded skies, contrails are warming the nights by trapping the day’s heat near the ground.”

Conclusion: If we don't reduce atmospheric pollution, such as contrails and auto emissions, our civilized way of life is doomed. And that, folks, is NOT science fiction!

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» a few links (w/some cool pics) Posted by: MartianBachelor
Prophecy says the same thing
Posted by: sharonJ on Apr 17, 2007 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Years ago I devoted about 6 years of research to a possible book on prophecy regarding "earth changes." My conclusions were the same as the scientists re global warming--and the same as the prophets and psychics: that the deserts were the most fragile ecosystems and could not stand up to major climate changes. They would not be able to support most life and that there would have to be migrations to the more temperate zones where water was obtainable. That's why I'm staying put in Pennsylvania, which will remain green and wet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same old merry-go-round
Posted by: willymack on Apr 17, 2007 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Global warming is a hot topic for the time being, and will be until the next self-inflicted (potential) disaster looms its hideous head. One thing for certain is that you can't fool with Mother Nature and expect to come away unscathed. To say or think that "human activity" is not making things worse for us all is sheer folly. We keep right on increasing our population as if our only home is not seriously or even terminally ill. If population increase does not come to an abrupt and schreeching halt, then a vengeful Mom Nature will do the job for us, and it won't be pretty. Earth will continue to exist-minus homo sapiens, and the rats & roaches will do a much better job of caring for our Earth Mother, the giver and sustainer of life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Same old merry-go-round Posted by: grolan
That old 'rising tide' lie of Empire finally swamps it
Posted by: amacd on Apr 17, 2007 11:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is beyond irony that the very analogy and allusion (illusion) that the ruling elite had settled upon in the late twentieth century as their last argument to keep the poor poor, and to justify the investment stream that can only spout from a high degree of global and US inequality; that a ‘rising tide will lift all boats’, is now so precisely and ineluctably the harsh and contradicting reality that, in the 21st century, is ushering in the rising tides of global warming that will sink the elite’s last justification of their sanctimonious economic eliteness --- and sink the whole idea of ‘growth’ as cancerous metastasis through negative externality dumping. When this last illusion of ‘growth’ requiring elite capital concentration is gone then all justification of economic inequality is gone too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Close to Home
Posted by: mrsmagoo on Apr 17, 2007 11:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article really hits close to home. My husband and myself, both native Michiganians (Michiganders for the P.C.), but met in Arizona over 25 yrs ago. We really loved Arizona and wanted to stay there, but we decided that in the long run we'd be better off to move back to Michigan because eventually there would be little water to go around as people weren't especially into conservation back then - and certainly aren't today, in this era of super-size everything. Now, the conversation is on what is going to happen in the not-to-distant future? Our state government and those states surrounding the Great Lakes have a compact regarding exporting water from the lakes to any region (It is happening already). Hopefully, a sane solution will be found to help those in need, but people who choose to live out there should pay the price if they choose to drive SUV's, live in huge mansions, have a lawn, golf, etc. The Great Lakes may not be so great if everybody keeps living a bloated lifestyle!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Close to Home Posted by: grolan
One small thing on the plus side
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Apr 17, 2007 12:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gingrich is sorta getting onboard. I haven't seen anyone else mention the 2-hour debate he had with Sen. Kerry on global climate change a week ago. He said he'd read Kerry's book and was 60% in agreement with it.

It was on C-Span, and you may be able to find it there if you want to watch it... here's the link

It's worth the two hours, if only because it's something of a model of one of the ways our presidential debates could be improved - namely by giving each participant many minutes to make long and sometimes involved arguments, rather than them just trading soundbites to stupid moderator questions.

Gingrich is an accomplished debater, even if he comes across as sounding as though tax incentives are pretty much the whole solution (it may be all 'they' will allow at this point), and Kerry bungled some of the science at one point, while arguably coming across as wanting to tax everything in sight. Ok, so they're both politicians with somewhat predictable axes to grind.

But I hope others over on the far right will take a cue from one of their favorites that it's Ok to be thinking about GW and what to do, though I've been trying to monitor O'Lielly this week for mention of the debate but haven't seen any.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» a quote Posted by: MartianBachelor
Satellite Looks
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive on Apr 17, 2007 1:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Check out one of the great water places of the West; Lake Mead.
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study/LakeMead/

And now California. We're beginning to cook out here!
Lookin' grim!

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/NewImages/
images.php3?img_id=17616

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Global warming is the Iraq war of the left?
Posted by: chief of okeefe on Apr 17, 2007 4:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because when you try to examine proven facts, and apply logic, both factions, when their sacred-cow emergency is threatened, react with ridiculous, apocalyptic predictions.

"If we withdraw from Iraq, they will follow us home and take over".

"Human-induced global warming will destroy the planet and wipe out humans as a species".

Be objective here kids. Both kinds of statements are intended to do one thing: prevent any kind of rational, thoughtful debate.

Now one comment about the article: Never mind telling me that someone's model predicted droughts in the Southwest. Because I predict that if the SW starts getting wet again for a few years, the GW fanatics will dig up other models to "prove" that this was predicted.

When this whole issue stops looking like a religion and starts looking like science, then I will listen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Can you say 'straw man'? Posted by: MartianBachelor
Corporate Greed
Posted by: snowhound on Apr 17, 2007 4:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Union of Concerned Scientists found that 58% of the 279 climate scientists working at federal agencies in the US who responded to its survey reported that they had experienced one of the following constraints.

1. Pressure to eliminate the words climate change, global warming, or other similar terms from their communications.

2. Editing of scientific reports by their superiors which changed the meaning of scientific findings.

3. Statements by officials at their agencies which misrepresented their findings.

4. The disappearance or unusual delay of websites, reports, or other science-based materials relating to climate.

5. New or unusual administrative requirements that impair climate-related work.

6. Situations in which scientists have actively objected to, resigned from, or removed themselves from a project because of pressure to change scientific findings. They reported 435 incidents of political interference over the past five years..."

When the people over throw the goverment and tell corporate America to kiss their A$$, that's when things will change. Your vote will never count!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A special post for Jew haters commenting on this thread about the Holocaust.
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 17, 2007 8:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By the end of World War II, much of the Jewish population of Europe had been killed in the Holocaust.
In Poland, home of the globe’s largest Jewish community before the war started, 90% of its Hebrew population was exterminated by the Nazis -- about half of the accepted 6,000,000 Holocaust deaths.

Conversely, in Russia during WWII, the accepted number of civilian fatalities is around 12,000,000 -- less than 10 percent of the population -- and they died mainly from starvation and bombings, not poison gas and firing squads.

Only evil-minded, racist psychopaths would argue that deaths of Russian civilians in WWII eclipsed the horrific Holocaust.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Plop! Plop! Fizz! Fizz! Oh what a relief it is!
Posted by: williameon on Apr 18, 2007 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The American Stupid State Drives On!

Divide and Conquer!
Who’s got the real Nuclear Weapons?
And
Who’s?
Going around beating
Everybody
Over the head
With them?
DA!! DA!!
Big secret!

Focusing your attention on anything, but the TRUTH!
Is, The FAUX MEDIA’S job.

Now on to something important.

The Creature that we live on
The Mother Earth!
Is alive!
A Sentient Being.

The Mother Earth in all her wisdom
Has deemed it necessary to make a self preservation move.
To dilute all the pollution
Poured in the Oceans.
Shift the Poles.
Flood the world!

The magnetic fields of the Earth are in constant flux.
The North Pole is migrating at an accelerating rate towards Siberia.

Once it hits the tipping point.
The change will be
Very fast!
In a twinkling of the eye.
Plop!
Plop!
Fizz!
Fizz!
Oh!
What a relief
It is!

Till the Poles reform in their new position.
There will be plenty of extra water
To go around:
For everyone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

With all these Gores on the left
Posted by: ng1944 on Apr 18, 2007 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush looks better and better

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rain Water Collection
Posted by: sallym on Apr 18, 2007 12:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the past several years we have lived in an adobe solar home we built in rural Southeastern Arizona and have existed completely with rainwater collection. We invested in water tanks and metal roofs and a conserving lifestyle. We recently sold that home and originally had to agree to dig a well in a remarkably dry area in order to list the property - we were heart-broken. Unbelieveably, the new owners saw the effciency and practicality of having this system and we didn't have to dig a well! Even in the dry years, we were self-sufficient. And rainwater is the gold standard in soft water. Today we live in Tucson with no water conservation and water hard as a rock. There are some out there who do the good work on rainwater harvesting - but like solar, there is so much mis-conception about this system. We are always surprised that humankind must always hit the wall before taking the right turn. Imagine thinking ahead and planning thoughtfully for solutions before they become crisis!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the government is protecting us
Posted by: myself on Apr 19, 2007 8:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THE GOVERNMENT REALIZES THAT THE WORLD IS WARMING --DUE TO WASTE HEAT

THE GOVERNMENT STARTS A PROGRAM TO SPRAY AEROSOLS IN THE UPPER ATMOSPHERE IN ORDER TO CUT DOWN SOLAR GAIN

THEY THINK THEY ARE PROTECTING US

BUT THEY ARE BEING MANIPULATED BY SOMETHING ABOVE THEIR CONTROL

WATCH HOW MANY CONTRAIL DAYS ARE FOLLOWED BY COOLER DAYS

IT IS SIMPLE REALLY-- JUST CLOUD THE EARTH AND THEREBY COOL IT

BUT WHAT HAPPENS TO THE SUNLIGHT WE USED TO SEE

THEY ARE 'CREATING' NUCLEAR WINTER
AND THEY ARE DECIEVING US

ALL WARMING IS CAUSED BY HUMANKINDS WASTE HEAT

BUT THEY DO NOT WANT YOU TO UNDERSTAND THAT

AND SO THEY SEED THE SKY

AND FOOL YOU UNTIL IT IS TOO LATE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]