5 Crucial New Findings About Climate Change
Continued from previous page
As you remember from above, countries aren’t even hitting those pledges, so we’re woefully off-base.
4. Center for American Progress: We’re Especially Screwing Over the Poor and Middle-Class
The U.S. is getting hammered by extreme weather events. “Munich Re, the world’s largest reinsurance firm, found that North America is experiencing a tremendous rise in extreme weather disasters -- a nearly fivefold increase over the past three decades,” reported the Center for American Progress. And this is thanks to climate change.
Knowing this, CAP took a look at how climate-related disasters such as drought, wildfires, winter storms and tropical storms affected people living in the U.S. What they found was, “Most of these extreme weather events typically harmed counties with household incomes below the U.S. median annual household income of $51,914”:
- Floods damaged households in affected counties with average household incomes of $44,547 annually -- 14 percent less than the U.S. median income
- Drought and heat waves affected counties with households that earned an average of $49,340 annually -- roughly 5 percent less than the U.S. median income
- Wildfires, tornadoes, and severe thunderstorms devastated areas with households that earned an average of $50,352 annually -- 3 percent less than the U.S. median income
As we know from Superstorm Sandy, the starkest contrasts between economic classes are often revealed in the aftereffects of disasters; those with fewer resources are often unable to flee areas ahead of coming disasters and poorer neighborhoods, including public housing complexes (as Steven Wishnia wrote for AlterNet), are among the last to have services restored. Nowhere is this disparity more clear than the story of Anthony Narh, a parking attendent at a posh TriBeCa building in New York City (in the evacuation zone), who was called to work during the storm and drowned when the garage filled with water.
5. World Resources Institute: Blame King Coal (and Ourselves)
Here’s a basic fact: the biggest contributors to climate change are coal-fired power plants. So if we’re staring down the barrel of the climate change gun, what makes the most sense? Cut down on our coal burning, of course. But what are we planning to do? According to a new report from the World Resources Institute, 1,199 new coal-burning power plants have been proposed across the world.
China ranks first in the world in coal production and consumption — by a great margin. The U.S. and India are second and third respectively, in both categories as well. When it comes to new capacity, India has the most number of proposed new projects at 455, while China is second in the number of projects (363) but tops the list in what the installed capacity would be. The U.S. is seventh in installed capacity with 36 new coal-burning power plants proposed.
Stephen Lacey writes for Climate Progress:
The report outlines virtually every coal plant announced around the world. That does not necessarily mean that every one will get built. In the U.S., for example, it is highly unlikely that many — if any — new coal plants will move forward as cheap natural gas, growing renewables, and legal pressure from environmental groups trips up the pipeline. (Also, as Justin Guay of the Sierra Club points out in a piece today, local resistance in communities around the world is also hindering many of these projects).
But the tally is still staggering. If all these plants were built, they would amount to generation capacity four times greater than the entire U.S. coal fleet.
Time to get our heads out of the sand and get to work.