Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

New Efforts to Predict When Polar Ice Will Melt

By Gregory M. Lamb, Christian Science Monitor. Posted March 28, 2007.


A new study finds that as Arctic warming accelerates, polar waters could become ice-free by the turn of the century, or, under one scenario, as early as 2040.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The loss of sea ice in the Arctic may have reached a "tipping point" that could "trigger a cascade of climate change" reaching much farther south. As Arctic warming accelerates, polar waters could become ice-free by the turn of the century, or, under one scenario, as early as 2040.

These are among the conclusions of a new study published March 16 in the journal Science. The area of the Arctic covered by sea ice has been shrinking at least since 1979, when regular satellite observations began.

The report attributes the loss of ice, averaging about 38,000 square miles annually (an area about the size of Maine), to rising concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, as well as to natural variability.

Says Mark Serreze, a senior research scientist at the University of Colorado's National Snow and Ice Data Center and the lead researcher on the report:

"When the ice thins to a vulnerable state, the bottom will drop out, and we may quickly move into a new, seasonally ice-free state of the Arctic. I think there is some evidence that we may have reached that tipping point, and the impacts will not be confined to the Arctic region."
The effects could be felt widely around the world and could include drought in the American West and increased winter rains over Western and Southern Europe, notes a story in Britain's Telegraph. Dr. Serreze told the newspaper:
"The basic issue is that the Arctic acts as the Northern Hemisphere 'refrigerator' of the climate system. Change the nature of the refrigerator, and the rest of the climate system will respond."
Out of 15 computer models that Serreze and his team studied, about half forecast that sea ice would disappear for at least part of the year by 2100, according to a story about the study in the Los Angeles Times. If you jump in a plane and head north into the Arctic, the change is apparent, the Times says.

"You have to fly a lot longer to get to the ice edge than you used to," says Josefino Comiso, a satellite-imaging expert at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, who was not an author of the report. Some experts say that as more ice disappears and turns to open ocean, which absorbs heat more easily, melting will accelerate. Adds Mr. Comiso: "With less and less ice, you have more and more heat."

At the same time, open waters could offer benefits, clearing passageways now blocked by ice for shipping and oil production, notes a story from Reuters. In a report prepared for the US government, the US Arctic Research Commission says:
"Diminishing sea ice conditions in the Arctic Ocean are changing ecosystems, most conspicuously for polar bears. This also creates unprecedented access for ships that will bring people to the north, and will significantly shorten global marine transportation routes."
The Arctic is thought to hold about 25 percent of the remaining oil and gas reserves in the world, which could be easier to reach by sea. But that could also bring added risk of oil spills and the need for new cleanup methods.

"Cleaning up oil in ice is a bear," says Mead Treadwell, the commission chairman.

The Guardian takes note of the Arctic report and adds that scientists in Britain have found four glaciers at the other end of the world, in Antarctica, retreating in unison.

Duncan Wingham at University College in London and Andrew Shepherd at Edinburgh University in Scotland reviewed five years of Antarctic observations and found that the glaciers -- Pine Island and Thwaites on the western Antarctic and Totten and Cook glaciers in the eastern Antarctic -- were retreating in unison, faster than in previous decades. Says Dr. Wingham:
"Although the amounts of water aren't yet that large, the concern is that we simply don't know what's causing this acceleration of [melting in] these glaciers. It may be that warm ocean water is getting underneath them and making them flow more easily."
Earth's poles are very sensitive and "they're experiencing more change compared to what the tropics are," Ross Virginia, a professor of environmental studies at Dartmouth College in Hanover, N.H., told Reuters. The school hosted a summit on the Arctic that ended this week.

"Almost every aspect of our life is certainly connected to weather and to climate, so no one can really hide from this," Mr. Virginia added. "We're all going to be punched by these changes. The polar regions are where it's happening first."

The conference was part of activities supporting the International Polar Year, an effort to learn more about the Arctic and Antarctic regions that will actually last two years, until March 2009, and will allow scientists to observe conditions at both poles during all seasons.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: global warming, climate change, polar ice

Gregory Lamb is a staff writer for The Christian Science Monitor.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Oh, Yippie!!!
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Mar 28, 2007 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, Yippie!!! Polar bears will be extinct in the wild but we'll have easier access to oil reserves. Ships will move freely. Corporations will make more $$ and control the world. Woo Hoo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh, Yippie!!! Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: Oh, Yippie!!! Posted by: ConnecttheDots
British Petroleum and the New Greenmail By IAIN BOAL
Posted by: rwa on Mar 28, 2007 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
British Petroleum's proposed biofuel research deal with the University of California has sparked a growing resistance from a coalition based in UC Berkeley's College of Natural Resources, claiming the deal is essentially a continuation of BP's current greenwash campaign... the BP deal-whose specifics remain largely unknown-is bound to produce an atmosphere of secrecy in the research laboratories of a public institution which under the agreement will be staffed by scientist-entrepreneurs enriching themselves by way of private patents and stock options, in a direct conflict of interest.

One of the first casualties of the deal is already clear--the English language. The authors of this proposal have already begun a laundering operation, even before the deal is signed. Genetically modified organisms and biotechnology are nowhere to be seen. The brief era of "biotech" is over, it seems; a new age of "synthetic biology" is dawning. Oddly, we find ourselves back in a world of electricians, chemists and masons. Instead of living GMOs we are dealing with "DNA circuits"; instead of genes we find "biobricks". Plants no longer decompose; in this brave new science they undergo "depolymerization". These linguistic constructs are presumably an attempt to obscure the fact that the core of the BP project for growing fuel instead of food remains the global proliferation of new, reproducing, lifeforms that contain genes transfected from distant species, with very poorly understood results.

It is not by accident that the parties to the BP-Berkeley deal borrow their rhetorical strategies from their counterparts in the military and nuclear fields. The UC scientists and administrators begin the proposal by invoking, in the most effusive terms, the Manhattan Project. In fact, the whole initiative is to be modeled on the Manhattan Project's "team science" model. But that project is properly remembered for its secret, reckless decision-making. With its very first experiment, Arthur Compton, the head of the Chicago scientists involved, risked building a secret reactor in the middle of the city. Compton explained: "We did not see how a true nuclear explosion, such as that of an atomic bomb, could possibly occur"; still, as Richard Rhodes the historian of the Manhattan Project put it, he was risking "a small Chernobyl in the midst of a crowded city."

Now the cult of the atom is mirrored and even matched by the cult of the gene. The stakes are high, they tell us, global warming and oil depletion loom. It is all rather plausible, even if promoted by known market manipulators such as BP-its history of machinations we shall address later-but for now it is worth asking: what does it mean, when the language of crisis is on so many lips? Suddenly, everyone is on board with biofuels as the answer to global warming--scientists, environmentalists, pundits, celebrities, politicians of all stripes-the Gores and Bransons and Blairs, and now the Bushes, with their ethanol deal with Brazil.

Global emergency, like communism and terrorism, is a very useful bogey man that brooks no dissent. It facilitates backroom deals, and in the BP case (an agreement put together, in the revealing phrase of the UC vice chancellor for research, "at warp speed"), it obscures the risks that university administrators and scientists are prepared to take not only with the local environment of Strawberry Canyon, but with the ecosystems of the planet and the lives of small farmers everywhere who face further dispossession for the purpose of biofuel monoculture. But risk, of course, is something our neoliberal masters are adept at "externalizing"; after all, its other face is profit.

Iain Boal is a historian of technics and the commons, a member of the Retort collective, and a co-author of Afflicted Powers. He can be reached at: iboal@socrates.Berkeley.EDU

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One of many bad trend lines - and they are converging.
Posted by: CriminallySane on Mar 28, 2007 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2040-2050 is going to be a rough decade. North Polar sea ice gone in summer, the collapse of ocean food fish stocks, and the world's population reaching 9 billion are all anticipated for that small window. Now add in the increasing severity of storms along the fonts between two air masses, the coastal inundation that will undoubtedly affect the large percentage of the world's current 6+ billion (half?) that live within 3 feet of current sea level, and it begins to look like the best advice we can give or get is just to go enjoy ourselves, because the things a lot of people say we're going to need to do to stave this "future" off are not happening. And they won't be happening, because there's far too much profit being made by not doing them. (The fact that there is a lot of profit to be made by addressing the problems doesn't matter to those currently profiting, because there are costs and change associated with that addressing.)

"The hungry sheep look up, and are not fed,
But swoln with wind, and the rank mist they draw,
Rot inwardly, and foul contagion spread..."

-- Milton, "Lycidias"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Prepare for the "Great Deceleration" Posted by: eddie torres
» Let's ask Paris! Posted by: James T. Swaggart
» RE: Too many people Posted by: vertical
Polar Bears Support Abortion -- They Deserve It
Posted by: James T. Swaggart on Mar 28, 2007 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"At the same time, open waters could offer benefits, clearing passageways now blocked by ice for shipping and oil production."

You've got to be kidding me. This is the sort of shit that gives politicians and big industry a hard-on. Well, perhaps fond memories of a hard-on -- heart problems and all that -- that's neither here nor there. But the voting public doesn't give a shit. They're more concerned with abortion and gay marriage and pop culture.

What this article fails to mention is that if the polar ice disappears and the oceans warm, the impact on ocean currents will make a drought in the American west and rain in Europe look like a good time. May not happen in an instant, but it will happen. Leave the milk on the counter long enough and it goes bad; so goes the world.

Why the author fails to complete the tale is a mystery.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Me so scared.....
Posted by: dikaiosyne on Mar 28, 2007 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What Crap! Another edition of the sky is falling scenario. You people promoting GOREBAL WARMING haven't proved a damn thing yet. All we get from you is hyterical proclamations that the sea levels will rise and that we'll do a slow bake over the next hundred years. Bunch of friggin' ninnies with no sense to tell you that you're being set up by the new communism disguised as enviromentalism. This is just another strategy to wrest power and control from sovereign nations and individuals and put it in the hands of the political elite. Notice how any aberation in temp or storm frequency and intensity is promoted as "evidence" that the climate is going downhill fast. Of course any fluxuation in anything whether its increased storm activity or NO storm activity its always a symptom of GOREBAL WARMING. Remember that last year there were climatologists showing that the east coast of America would suffer as many hurricanes as the the year before based on their evidence of GOREBAL WARMING? AWWW!.....DIDN'T HAPPEN! Wouldn't have mattered if the storms increased or decreased in frequency or intensity or no storms at all. Its because of GOREBAL WARMING!!! Too much rain....GOREBAL WARMING! Too much snow...GOREBAL WARMING!!! Too hot....GOREBAL WARMING!!! Too cold....GOREBAL WARMING!!! There is no scenario that the GW whackos can't adapt to GOREBAL WARMING!!! Scuse me now....but I have to go plant this years crop of genuine Maryland bananas. I suspect its going to be a bumper crop this year because of GOREBAL WARMING!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» GOREBAL -- Brilliant! yawn Posted by: James T. Swaggart
» RE: compare pictures Posted by: AlienSlave
» RE: Me so scared..... Posted by: particle
» RE: Me so scared..... Posted by: dmmaze6
» Don't Feed the Troll Posted by: grolan
And another thing
Posted by: famouspipeliner on Mar 28, 2007 11:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Canadian conservative movement is chock full of those in denial about global warming...including the Canadian Prime Minister. Mr. Harper once claimed that the whole concept of climate change was a left wing invention to transfer wealth from the west to third world countries. At the same time, he is advocating building naval bases in the arctic to defend Canada's territorial waters, given that the northwest passage is indeed becoming ice-free. Talk about disconnect.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Computer models
Posted by: maxloen on Mar 28, 2007 5:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If colder Artic waters don't sink to the bottom of the ocean due to its greater weight, then the Gulf Current that makes Northern Europe so much more livable than say, Juno, Alaska, will disperse on its way there, and make Europe frigid cold and more inhospitable, even for its native residents, not just for the refugees from ransacked African or Middle Eastern lands. The storms from Shiva's Dance, and ultimate Quantuum justice, spare no one!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Daily Charade!
Posted by: williameon on Mar 29, 2007 6:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Paid to be Left out in the cold!

Why are the
Corpirates
Spending so much money
De-Funking
Global Warming
Because they will benefit.
And
You
Will be holding
The Bag!

While
The
Willy Nellie’s
Run around
Like Chickens
With their heads
Cut off.

The
Corpirates
Raise
The AXE
Yet
Again!

We live in a test tube
A
Shrub & Co.
Experiment.

What do you think?

That this is the first time?

Man has destroyed himself
Countless times before!
Destroyed by the same
Soulless,
Greedy,
Psychopaths.

The Shrub Bleeds on
Filling
So many
Empty heads
With
So much
BU__! SH__!

That they finally
Burst
And
Spew it
Vomiting
Endless
Reptilian
Proper-gander!

That’s original
Oh,
Zen
I pod
Master!

Yours Truly,
Their
Savoir
The Shrub
Has much in common
With them.
Dim Bulbs
Kept
In the dark,
In the closet!

As they
Slaughter
Endless
Sheeple!

The Sheeple never get it!
As they
March
Over a cliff
Clutching a flag.

They think the
Flag will save them!
Then into a parachute
Defy the gravity
Of the situation

Save them!
Only they can do that.
Save them selves!
From their own
Ignorance,
and
Fear.

Now!
That would be
Real Magic!


They are disconnected from reality
Living in Fear and Loathing!
Drowned in
Self-righteousness!
And
Ineptitude.

Afraid
To stand on their own
Two feet
And
Fend for them selves.

They grasp at anything
In desperation
Like a person drowning
They cling to
Any
Corpirate
Delusion

Grasping at straws
The listen to:
The FAUX BLUES!
The DAILY CHERADE!
That’s why they are here.
Dopamine
For the
Crazes

As we
Visit
DÉJÀ VU
All over again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eating their young
Posted by: disgusted on Mar 29, 2007 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For many years I pondered if humans had any taboos; finally I came to the conclusion that they prefer not to eat their young. The Republican denial of global warming proves that I am wrong again. Dogs prefer not to foul their own nest, but
humans in the face of impending doom continue to pollute their own biosphere. Many republicans alter and deny irrefutable science assurring for their children and grand
children a life much different and more difficult than our own.
What is the point? Where is the profit? In the end shall these ghouls prefer to live underground and greet each new pregnancy with gala gifting of crockery and cutlery?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement