Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Organic Food: The Farmer's Conundrum

By Tom Philpott, Grist.org. Posted March 27, 2007.


If organic food is so popular, why are so few farms transitioning their land?
Advertisement

This article is reprinted by permission from Grist. For more environmental news and humor sign up for Grist's free email service.

On a recent trip to Austin, I visited the flagship Whole Foods -- a vast space where people gather en masse to render financial sacrifice to that new god, organic food. From the depths of the parking lot, as you make your way up to the store, you're urged again and again by a sign that simply says, "Love where you shop." From the doe-eyed look of the supplicants making their way up, and the glazed-eyed look of those carrying their treasure down, most clearly do.

While few Whole Foods stores have the buzz of the Austin flagship, that veritable cathedral of gustatory virtue is emblematic of organic food's rising social status. According to the Organic Trade Association's most current figures [PDF], consumer demand for it leapt 16 percent in 2005.

That's a little lower than the 20 percent figure commonly bandied about to describe the market's growth, but it's by no means shabby, considering that the overall U.S. food market grows by just 2 percent to 4 percent per year. It turns out that the $34 billion the food industry drops on marketing every year doesn't inspire people to eat more -- it just gets them to shift around their food dollars from one product to another.

No wonder corporate giants from Wal-Mart to McDonald's are groping for a slice of the organic pie. Generating 16 percent annual growth for a given product normally requires a massive marketing budget; organic foods fly off the shelf just by being labeled as such.

But if consumers are snapping up organics and corporations are scrambling to give them what they want -- if not always exactly what they want -- a funny thing is happening down on the farm: growth in organic acreage isn't coming even close to keeping up with retail-sales growth. That is, existing farms aren't transitioning acres to organic -- and new farms aren't being rolled out -- at nearly the growth rate of organic-food demand.

This is an important point. One of the great motivations of "buying organic" is protecting the land, water, and air from the cascades of poison sprays and artificial fertilizers dumped on farmland each year. Shouldn't booming demand for organic food translate to a proportionate boom in organic land under cultivation?

California Dreams ... and Realities

In the U.S., organic food accounts for [PDF] about 2.5 percent of all food sales. But out in the field, just 0.2 percent of farmland is under organic production. In Europe, by contrast, organic food accounts for a just-higher percentage of all food sales than in the U.S., but organic agriculture is more pervasive -- E.U.-wide, it occupies nearly 4 percent of farmland.

Indeed, New Farm reports that Italy alone, not quite as large in size as New Mexico, has more land in organic agriculture than the entire United States!

Why is organic a more popular concept on our supermarket shelves than in our farm fields? The California Institute for Rural Studies released a study [PDF] recently addressing that very question. It raises some bracing facts. If any state would be expected to boast a bounty of land under organic cultivation, it's California, the nation's fruit and vegetable basket and source of 40 percent of all farm-level U.S. organic produce sales.

But even in California, organic ag represents just 0.63 percent of farmland. Organic acreage did double between 1998 and 2003, but growth has leveled off and acreage now just holds steady. Total acres transitioning into organic are now nearly balanced by the acres transitioning out. Evidently, many farmers aren't making enough money growing organically to remain certified, despite the booming retail market.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: organic, farming, agriculture

Grist staff writer Tom Philpott farms and cooks at Maverick Farms, a sustainable-agriculture nonprofit and small farm in the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Organic Food is a SCAM
Posted by: jwc on Mar 27, 2007 2:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Click here
for a well-written, easy to understand, scientifically-based article about this topic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Quackwatch is a quack. Posted by: bornxeyed
» Your ignorance is showing! Posted by: wireup
» If your spelling and grammar were better Posted by: Rod from Canada
SLUDGE
Posted by: socialpsych on Mar 27, 2007 4:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another force that is slowing the growth of organic farming is the biosolids (or sludge) industry. Companies like Houston-based Synagro (whose meteoric rise suspiciously parallels the rise of a Houston-based dope to the White House) supply free biosolids to farmers, who spread the stuff on their fields. With 3 inches of biosolids applied to a field, the farmer doesn't have to buy petroleum-based fertilizer. Sounds like a great deal, until one considers what is IN biosolids: human shit full of heavy metals, hormones, antibiotics, bacteria, viruses, and other nasty things that you would not want to be absorbed by your carrots and broccoli. It's not "free fertilizer" after all. It's poison. Interestingly, Synagro has made sure that state legislatures adopt industry-friendly laws governing biolsolids, so farming communities have no control over how they are applied or even recourse in the event that biosolids cause environemntal harm or make people or animals sick. What is needed is education about the realities of biosolids and more economic supports for farmers. That will help make organic farming a viable business.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: SLUDGE Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: SLUDGE Posted by: socialpsych
» RE: SLUDGE Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: SLUDGE Posted by: djnoll
» RE: This is a tragedy Posted by: oregoncharles
» TOXIC SLUDGE IS GOOD FOR YOU!! Posted by: Itsthewater
SOme of my best friends are organic farmers....
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line on Mar 27, 2007 4:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That being said, as a farmer myself I see no need whatsoever to be certified organic. My food speaks for itself in its freshness and its flavor.... I have been blessed with a farm that has very rich soil which makes everything taste very good. Just because something has that organic label on it, does not mean that is good. I appreciate people who want to take that extra step and certify, but the funny thing is after a while I get irritated at the folks that do certify and spend the day at farmers market telling everybody that they are better growers because they have a piece of paper that says they are organic. Not only that but they do charge ridiculous prices if you ask me. I do not choose to use any chemical fertilizers pesticides or herbecides... but I do keep my prices at a point where I think they are commensurate for the work I do and the quality of the food. Organic is basicallly a liscence to be an elitest. I am not going to lie and say that I do not charge high prices, I do. They are based on the qauality and reflect the real cost of putting that product on the table. I usually see the organic crowd charging at least 30% more than I do and as much as 50% more than the conventional growers(even the low spray folks).
Why dont I certify? I have issues with the general principle of telling the certifying agency what my inputs are and where I put my crops and where I get my seeds. Frankly it does not make my food better or worse... and as a matter of fact... some of my best friends are conventional growers too... and they are better farmers than the organic farmers in my opinion. Organic does not mean that your shit doesnt stink.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: SOme of my best friends are organic farmers.... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» Politicizes the market? Posted by: wireup
» RE: Politicizes the market? Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Politicizes the market? Posted by: kerikeifer
» RE: Politicizes the market? Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Politicizes the market? Posted by: kerikeifer
» RE: Politicizes the market? Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Politicizes the market? Posted by: kerikeifer
» RE: Fatman Posted by: henderson
» RE: Fatman Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Transitioning to organic is a complex and difficult process
Posted by: janten on Mar 27, 2007 4:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Transitioning to organic is a complex and difficult process in the current agricultural, environmental and political climate we have created so far. It's going to take a while yet before we can make greater progress towards a healthier land and healthier bodies.

A lot of farmers still don't understand the importance of organic farming and sustainable farming. Some do but are unable or afraid to start the transition process because doing so tends to cut off the hand that currently sustains their livelihood before the new hand is ready to take up where the old has let go. It can take years to transition land contaminated and weakened with fertilizers and pesticides, land which has been depleted in its ability to grow healthy crops without the application of artificially produced nutrition and protection.

It is also costly to go through the certification process to gain a wholesome organic status and, only after the transition and certification can the farmer begin to reap some profit for his efforts. This is beyond the capacity of many small farmers, even if they would like to switch. And they have to do this in the face of competition from the large operations that have already switched or are already in the process.

The farmers also lack sufficient support from the public, most of whom do not really understand what organic and sustainable really mean, including the real costs of agricultural practices. The prices of non-organic are very artificial in that they do not at all reflect the environmental and health costs associated with the chemical based practices of big agribusiness that are destroying the life sustaining qualities of our soils and also destroying our soils through loss, as well as feeding us food that is not as fully nutritious and life sustaining as it should be, which leads to more health problems for everyone.

The price of organic products grown in a sustainable manner more truly reflects all of the factors involved in the production of these foods. Production of these foods also preserves the capacity of our soils to continue producing healthy food and minimizes the impacts of agriculture on our air and water quality, all of which actually helps keep down some of the real costs of food production.

Ultimately, the costs of the food produced by large, chemical based agribusiness is much higher than the costs of organic food produced in a sustainable manner. Unfortunately, not enough people really understand this yet, farmers, marketers, bankers, politicians, bureaucrats, consumers, even members of our health care community, our doctors, nurses, nutritionists. There is still a great deal of resistance to any movement toward a more sustainable agricultural system - as exemplified by the Quackwatch link provided in the first comment.

There is still much work to be done. We need more research, we need to develop and fairly enforce clearly defined agricultural rules, we need to create a more friendly political and financial climate, we need better education for all, including our health care professionals. It takes more than just farmers to make this all work smoothly, this transition to a healthier

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hartsmartliving
Posted by: hartsmart on Mar 27, 2007 5:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Saturation organic propaganda! Promoted by any and all food science 'experts'. The masterful distraction from the monumental failure to deal with diabetes and obesity. ( And pick your pockets in the process).
The human race has survived on the ingenious ability to adjust and, in most cases, handle adversity and make it a win-win survival game. Revel in it, go orgasmic!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Certified organic?
Posted by: Bart Thesc on Mar 27, 2007 6:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are no certification standards that are agreed upon currently. Current standards are heavily under dispute and arguments that are being accepted by our elected officials are those that don't pass a smell test for being "organic".

A local farmer who told me he hasn't put chemicals on his fields for three years would sooner get my dollars than someone who claims to be strictly (barely?) meeting vague USDA requirements.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rural communities
Posted by: jmndodge on Mar 27, 2007 6:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sad fact is that our rural communities have changed more than our land. We no longer have a population base to sustain a labor intensive farming practice. Small farmers by 20 to 30 year old machinery from their neighbors. This equipment is now large equipment, and cheaper than new small equipment which is difficult to find. Small older tractors tend to be in the 40 to 60 years old category, and are either restored collector pieces or have run augers and mown farm lawns for a life time. This is an issue which we will have to address, and organic needs to be more than retired urbanites playing country gentlemen with large gardens and animal pets.
The change to organic is opposed by industry. Profits are thought to be in supplying large scale operations, with a small percentage profit, and huge cash flow. Remember the rural communities of the 1940's were almost all organic. Small farms had hired hands, thowns were filled, people remember it as the good life, but understand that these were people who were poor, who didn't travel, who produced most of what they used, and made due with what they couldn't afford. I don't see commitment to this type of social re-organization, although the movement of population, and return to neighborhood based community would also have positive inpacts on urban unemployment ghettos.
Many of our farmers are still involved in production into their 70's and beyond. They bring a wealth of experience. They all started out organic, and labor intensive, still possess muscles I didn’t know existed, and remember the production levels when they were young. They know that not only the method of farming has changed but also the results. No just the business bottom line, but edible product pound per acre. They worry that a transition to organic would lead to world wide famine. They are believers in the theme “American Farmers Feed the World”.
A final comment, AMNT (Amish Naturals Inc) is a new company providing organic products utilizing a new marketing plan from an old production base. You might want to check them out. A great deal of education needs to take place, that goes beyond talking about organic certified. Sustainable life, not just sustainable agriculture needs to become our topic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: rural communities Posted by: zooeyhall
» RE: rural communities Posted by: Jarmadi
The movement to debase organic standards
Posted by: wireup on Mar 27, 2007 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For anyone who doesn't know, there is now a movement afoot to debase the hard-won organic standards adopted by the USDA after 10 years.

For more information on this, go to the website of the Organic Consumers Association. This is the link on organic standards:

http://organicconsumers.org/sos.cfm

This link on their website discusses the boycott of Horizion Organic:

http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_4590.cfm

A number of companies are trying to water down the organic standards and this must be halted. If their effort succeeds, organic will mean nothing, eventually, except high prices for inferior food.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keep 'Em Coming...
Posted by: grumble-bum on Mar 27, 2007 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for another article that probes further into the sometimes tricky issues surrounding "organics".

I think as more people take the time to become informed, we will see the importance of government-approved "organic" labeling, & the cachet associated with it, diminish. It seems that (as often happens) "organic" has been diluted & co-opted by corporations vying for control of vast markets. However, a large segment of the target audience happens to have been hip to the concepts involved years before Industry even took note. It's a rare case where we actually have an upper hand! In other words, the big corporations are scrambling to react to our perceived desires, rather than freely dictating them to us as they usually do.

As for me, personally, I give precedence to other factors above & beyond "organic" alone when making food purchases. & I recently have had a series of great conversations with customers at the Natural Food Co-op where I work that indicate that many people are looking to go "beyond organic", as well. Places like Whole Foods & companies like Kraft will no longer be dictating terms to us, if there is a growth of interest in self-education (regarding food & sustainability) that parallels the explosion of interest in "organics"...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Veggies, feed grains, and acreage
Posted by: fiutzi on Mar 27, 2007 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If dollars spent on fruits and vegetables (fresh or ketchup-ized) are driving the expansion of certified organic market share, it's not surprising that the share of farmland managed organically is lagging behind -- fruits and veggies are a high-cost, low-land area endeavor. At the opposite end of the spectrum are low-cost, high-land area grain and forage crops, which occupy the vast majority of farmed acres in the US.

If your sole objective as a consumer were increasing certified organic acreage, you'd probably want to spend as much money as possible on certified organic meat, from livestock raised on certified organic grain and pasture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kraft + US gov't lowered the Organic standards last year
Posted by: calistogababe on Mar 27, 2007 10:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I work at a local CSA (Community Supported/Shared Agriculture) . We are an old small organic farm, until last year, when the large food corp's went organic.
To make that possible, they and the US government
1. lowered the organic standards
2. increased the cost and administrative process to get certified as organic.
Example of lower standards: Organic pasturized milk and butter by a huge company comes from cows who never see daylight or graze on grass. etc. That is ok under the "new" organic law.

Example of cost to certify: Our farm, and many others, chose not to get certified. We can't afford to. Besides everyone knows our food is "beyond" organic and we farm in the true spirit of the old organic laws. So why pay a lot of money to use a label that is not as meaningful? We now advertise ourselves as living food and/or beyond organic and our main focus is on sustainability.

Why small farms wouldn't sell to Kraft: We do NOT transport our food beyond 20 miles and our members food has been harvested the day before pick up. There is no way a truly old fashioned organic farm could possibly sell their produce to Kraft and remain loyal to the spirit of sustainable agriculture.
So called "organic" stuff in the grocery store has been transported by airplanes half way around the world and grown in extremely toxic countries. Example: China and Mexico still use PCB. There's no way any farm can be toxic free anymore.
A great deal of food imported is radiated. Americans consume PCB via imported food, even though it's illegal in the US to use it. But that food can still qualify as organic under the new law.
Lastly, the government, our government, subsidizes these big corporate farms and that artifically reduces the price of food to the consumer. But that farmer is being paid via subsidy to compensate.
Again: dairy is a great example. You can not raise a cow humanly and sell the milk for less than $7.00 a half gallon. Small farms still rely on human labor which drives the cost of our products up. The government doesn't give us any subsidy...infact they seem to want us to go out of business.
This is now true around the world, not just in the USA.
Suzanne
1/3 of what you eat keeps you alive
the other 2/3's keeps your doctor alive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IN ONE WORD
Posted by: abqbabe on Mar 28, 2007 4:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Organic farms don't get SUBSIDIES.

They do it all on their own. No goverment handouts, the kind agribiz and conventional farmers [often] depend on to stay afloat. And old habits die hard, especially the free money kind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: IN ONE WORD Posted by: Jarmadi
I have a proposal
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Mar 28, 2007 9:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a) Eliminate all farm subsidies. b) Provide a food stamp debit card for every American citizen - simply for the asking (thus eliminating the enormous bureaucracy currently involved.) c) make processed foods off-limits for food stamp purchases (as toilet paper, soap and all other non-food necessities already are.)
Note: This should have the effect of raising farm prices and completely eliminate hunger in this country. It would be more than paid for through eliminating the bureaucracies and subsidies now employed and the monthly allotment should then be increased enough to allow an allotment for those non-food necessities. Way back in the seventies, we were spending an unbelievable $40,000 (in todays money, well over 100k) a year per poor person with a tiny fraction of that actually reaching the actual poor. I'm tired as hell of subsidizing megacorporations to grow plastic food when people are still hungry in this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I have a proposal - PS Posted by: UnEasyOne
Monk
Posted by: Monk on Mar 31, 2007 5:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the general public doesn't relize is that when Organic products are packaged in transferrable materials such as plastics. They're food is no longer Organic.

For instance, ketchup acid breaks down chemicals into it
from the plastic bottles.
It's called 'chemical leaching' or 'food leaching'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]