Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

IKEA: Who Says Big Retail Can't Be Good for the Environment?

By David Roberts, Grist.org. Posted March 1, 2007.


IKEA's environmental policies and ambitious future plans put U.S. retailers to shame.
Advertisement

This article is reprinted by permission from Grist. For more environmental news and humor sign up for Grist's free email service.

Last week, IKEA U.S. announced a "bag the plastic bag" initiative: the retailer will charge a nickel for plastic bags to discourage their use, donating all revenue to the nonprofit conservation group American Forests. The store will also let shoppers walk away with one of its iconic reusable blue bags for 59 cents.

Pleasant enough news, but it struck me as somewhat cosmetic. Hadn't I heard that IKEA's commitment to sustainability went much further than this?

A little poking around on the IKEA website uncovered a set of practices that puts every big U.S. retailer to shame. From the wood in its products to the factory conditions of its suppliers to the energy efficiency of its distribution network, IKEA has outlined tough, progressive standards almost unheard of in the U.S. Now it's working to move all its stores to completely renewable energy.

Why not brag about that stuff instead of the bags? I contacted IKEA's head of social and environmental responsibility, Thomas Bergmark, at the company's headquarters in Sweden to find out the details behind this unassuming approach.

Tell me a little bit about this initiative in the U.S. with the plastic bags.

It might be the first campaign where we are more on the offense. The basic strategy not only in U.S. but in all our markets has been to be quiet, low-key. We should first do and then talk. We have from time to time been a bit criticized because we have been too quiet. Different stakeholders have realized that we try hard and we do a lot -- so why don't we talk about it?

We have now for three years issued a yearly social and environmental report on the web. We communicate more in different kinds of media, of course in the catalogue and in IKEA family magazines for our customer club and so forth. This campaign is one step in that direction, to be more aggressive and more transparent in these issues.

How does IKEA view its obligation to the environment?

We have a vision for business that was written more than 30 years ago. It's about creating a better everyday life for the people. Today, it's obvious to care about the people you have to care about the environment.

The starting point for our sustainability is the people and the culture. We have a very strong company culture. One of the cornerstones since IKEA was founded more than 60 years ago is to care about resources -- we are clever with resources.

For the first 20 years, this was only about turning and twisting the materials to utilize them in the best possible way, to save on material and thereby save on costs. But today we know it's a perfect win-win also for the environment. You save on the resources, you save on the environment. That has evolved over the decades.

Then of course there is the core business side as well. We are more than aware of that. We have to take responsibility for these issues if customers are to trust us today and in the future. We are convinced that if we work hard on sustainability and make progress, it will build trust in our consumers and with the IKEA brand. The culture issues and the business issues meet with the brand and the IKEA logo.

Has IKEA tried to make its stores green?

We're focusing more and more on that. First of all, we are setting up an IKEA standard, which includes the different steps in establishing a store. The first step is to look into a site, the land and such, to make sure we are not stepping into any sensitive areas that should be protected for biodiversity or other reasons. We consider the building materials we use when building new stores. Now we also consider environmental issues.

Then, of course, it's about operations -- energy, water issues related to the stores. We do a really good job on waste sorting and recycling compared to many other retailers. Then there's the maintenance of the stores. And at the end of the day, it's the products we put in the stores.

What we recently started up on an international level is an extra focus on energy. We have set a long-term direction to supply all IKEA buildings with renewable energy, which means electricity and heating. We're also working on energy efficiency, to get 25 percent more energy efficient.

Will the renewable energy goal be met by buying offsets, or is there going to be on-site generation as well?


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: ikea, sustainability, environment, renewable energy

David Roberts is a staff writer at Grist.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Who says?
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 1, 2007 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who says?

Anyone who is honestly looking at the environmental impacts of consumerism and the industrialism that underwrites it. It is FAR more complex than just having a "green" store and "green" products.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who says? Posted by: LarryGroff
» Yes... lets be real. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» War. Posted by: ssmit355
» RE: smoke screen Posted by: sasquuatch55
Oddly I agree with both of you
Posted by: fifthworld on Mar 1, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Must be that we're in such a puzzling time - I'm as anti-consumerist and ant-capitalist, for that matter, as anyone, yet if a big store must exist let it be the best it can be.

A couple thoughts though: one, I don't Ikea products are too hot: a friend's bed started splitting out along the rails where those wood pegs insert into pressboard. Pretty lame. Though I guess other stuff is good quality and especially the prices are good.

Second, why does the Ikea official feel conflicted about not being more outspoken on their best practices? Putting out a report is fine, especially to show up the other huge retailers here (!) but it sounds like these "stakeholders" can't be happy with great success that comes from simply doing the right things and growing word-of-mouth etc. rather than by hyper-marketing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Tis true Posted by: fifthworld
Transparency first
Posted by: eddie torres on Mar 1, 2007 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IKEA ranks at #69 in market value (Financial Times valuation: $22 billion in 2005) of all the world's non-public businesses - including national oil companies, hedge funds, and private equity. IKEA is owned by the world's second-richest foundation (Stichting Ingka Foundation), which is controlled by a single family, and they use its status to limit public access to information about IKEA finances, investment activity, and operations.

How does anyone know that IKEA is operating in a "green" fashion, aside from company PR? Should IKEA be allowed to set their own timetable, standards, and definitions of "green" behavior?

How does anyone know that Exxon-Mobil is operating responsibly in Alaska despite causing the state's largest oil-spill-related environmental disaster?

GOVERNMENT-IMPOSED TRANSPARENCY. INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM.

Shine the light of day on corporations and wealthy families and they tend to change their behavior. Destroy independent journalism and independent public servants and countries get looted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Transparency first Posted by: timebomb734
» RE: Transparency first Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: Transparency first Posted by: timebomb734
Paper or Plastic bags? Which is better
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Mar 1, 2007 9:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously bringing your own bag is the best option. But for those times when you forgot, for whatever reason, to bring your own bag which is better: paper or plastic? I recall the argument for plastic was that it doesn't kill trees and they can be recycled. However, they have become a blight and are found everywhere in the streets, parks, etc. And they don't decompose fast. (Which is why some places like Ireland have banned them or charge you for them.) But paper is from trees, which can be replaced and decompose more rapidly and are 'natural'. So I lean towards paper but how do we know the industry is replacing the trees? Which is better??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» OH COM'ON Posted by: gellero
IKEA is part of the typical green-washing scheme. Fight to legalize HEMP 4 PLASTICS ! Here's why.
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 1, 2007 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.hempplastic.com

Yes, biodegradable plastic does exist. It's time to shut up and realize that the current typical plastics are just as responsible for our dependence on PETROLEUM. Hemp, on the other hand, would relieve America of its dependence and put real and well-paying jobs instead of the current rise in unemployment/underemployment and wars for oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And, of course... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» So is OIL DRILLING. Posted by: maxpayne
» True. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: True. Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: True. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: True. Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: True. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Well, Jason... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Hemp growing Posted by: sasquuatch55
» JoshuaLudd = RIGHTWING TROLL Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: JoshuaLudd = RIGHTWING TROLL Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Wow--conserve your energies. Posted by: ssmit355
IKEA products are crap
Posted by: DaBear on Mar 1, 2007 1:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I stopped buying IKEA years ago after spending way too much money for inferior garbage posing as furniture. I don't care how "green" they are or they become. Until they stop making garbage, IKEA is a waste of breath.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» EyeKrap Posted by: hole11
POLLUTION
Posted by: sasquuatch55 on Mar 2, 2007 6:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now what will they do about the massive pollution China creates from items produce for sale in the U.S.?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» NEO COLONIALIST Posted by: gellero
Does anyone think the ad for private jet travel on this page is misplaced?
Posted by: jessicawakeman on Mar 2, 2007 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone find it strange that the advertisement on a web page for an article about a great, environmentally progressive company is one for "10 hours of private jet travel"???

Ha!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PRIVATE JETS
Posted by: gellero on Mar 2, 2007 3:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alterneters all worship their leaders who have personal jets, right?? People should have and do what they can afford, right ?? Betcha wish your daddy had one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ahem... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Harrumph.......... Posted by: gellero
» RE: Harrumph.......... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» What hypocrisy? Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Oh, so NOW you understand me? Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» The Proof Josh.... Posted by: gellero
» RE: The Proof Josh.... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Where is the proof??? Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Deviant convience. Posted by: ssmit355
And what is Grist Magazine, the same anti-environment, anti-renewable advocate doing here?
Posted by: Jason Jordan on Mar 4, 2007 3:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's funny that Alternet gives the Magazine plenty of room to smear proponents of various alternative renewables while at the same time defending Big Business that simply paints itself as "green" for coverups. No wonder liberals lose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ikea and parking lots full of subarus and volvos
Posted by: lesnyulak on Mar 12, 2007 9:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've personally always equated IKEA as the place to shop for wannabe enviro yuppies of the type known to drive their fabulaous Subarus to organic produce stores.

...and I find it amusing that this big box could be adorned the enviromentally responsible title, when they encourage people to discard their "outdated" lamps and furnishings in favour of substandard, landfill swelling partical board effigies of supposed good (modern) taste.

Let's call a spade a spade - big corporate is bad... NOTHING is going to change that. The very idea that no one person makes the tough moral decisions leads to wasteful practices and cost-cutting maneuvers which are inevitably bad for the planet. A return to small-scale is the ONLY hope for this planet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]