Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Love Is In the Air for Big Business and Mainstream Enviros

By Amanda Griscom Little, Grist.org. Posted February 23, 2007.


The on-again-off-again flirtation between big business and the mainstream environmental movement seems to be progressing into a full-on steamy love affair -- and perhaps even a committed, long-term relationship.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Amanda Griscom Little writes the Muckraker column for Grist Magazine. Her column is reprinted by permission from Grist. For more environmental news and humor sign up for Grist's free email service.

The on-again-off-again flirtation between big business and the mainstream environmental movement seems to be progressing into a full-on steamy love affair -- and perhaps even a committed, long-term relationship.

On February 13, a handful of Fortune 500 execs joined Jonathan Lash, president of the environmental think tank World Resources Institute, to testify before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee in favor of a mandatory federal cap on greenhouse-gas emissions. "Voluntary efforts alone will not solve the [climate-change] problem," DuPont CEO Chad Holliday told the assembled senators. He added, "We see a whole suite of technologies to solve these problems, and we think the uncertainty of what regulations will do are holding companies back."

Committee Chair Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) had invited the corporate and environmental leaders to explain why they're increasingly concerned about global warming. Their unified testimony made an impact on at least one prominent Republican, Virginia Sen. John Warner, who could be a swing vote on climate legislation in the committee. "A group like this, you've got my attention," Warner said.

Holliday and Lash are both participants in the recently hatched U.S. Climate Action Partnership, as are two other witnesses who spoke at the hearing, Peter Darbee of Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and Steve Elbert of BP America. U.S. CAP, a coalition of 10 corporations and four green groups, is pushing for greenhouse-gas limits strong enough to slash emissions 60 to 80 percent by mid-century.

Directly after the hearings, Holliday and Lash hightailed it to New York City to join other corporate leaders and toast to their budding romance at a glitzy dinner party celebrating WRI's 25th anniversary.

The gala, held at the chic Cipriani on 42nd St., was big on many levels -- big turnout (nearly 700 well-heeled folks, nary a soul in Birkenstocks), big political and corporate star power (Al Gore, New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, and General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt took turns at the mic), big bucks (WRI raised over $2 million), and big, bold rhetoric affirming that the corporate-green alliance is now hot and heavy.

In a cathedral-like room with soaring ceilings, walls of burgundy marble, and chandeliers the size of jet engines, WRI doled out "Courage to Lead" awards to corporate titans and deep-pocketed donors deemed notable for "their vision and their actions to the cause of sustainable development." The recipients included Immelt, whose company has been greening its business strategy via an "ecomagination" campaign; the late Samuel Johnson, founder of SC Johnson and a former member of WRI's board of directors; and Jonathan Fanton, director of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, who announced during his acceptance speech his organization's new plans to commit $5 million over the next three years to climate research.

The crowd was dotted with representatives from companies belonging to the CAP alliance -- GE, Alcoa, BP, Caterpillar, DuPont, Lehman Brothers, PG&E -- as well as environmental groups involved -- Environmental Defense and the Natural Resources Defense Council. Other attendees represented a veritable who's who of powerful corporations: Bank of America, Coca-Cola, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Shell, Wal-Mart, and Weyerhaeuser. Citigroup Global Wealth Management underwrote the dinner.

A smattering of political notables were on hand too, including Rep. Mark Udall (D-Colo.); former Colorado Sen. Timothy Wirth, now president of the U.N. Foundation; and former deputy secretary of state Robert Zoellick, who left the Bush administration last summer to join Goldman Sachs as international vice chair.

Surveying the double-starched crowd as the festivities wound down, Lash told Muckraker, "I started out my career doing war against these companies, and here we are all having dinner together and planning the future. It's amazing!"

The emcee for the evening, Thomas Friedman, echoed his euphoria. "Look around the room," he said. "If there's gonna be a solution on climate, this is what it's gonna look like. You never would have seen this [collection of people] five years ago." What changed? "The reason the climate issue is taking off right now is above all because business leaders are embracing the profit potential of developing green technologies, and the only way these solutions will scale [to mainstream use] is if you have what we see here -- NGOs, government, and business working together."

Friedman stressed to the crowd that the theme of the night was optimism -- a marked departure from the doom and gloom oft associated with the environmental community. "Somebody once said that in the history of the world, pessimists are usually right, optimists are usually wrong," he said. "But all the great change in history was made by optimists. If there's a common denominator between WRI and all the people honored here this evening, it is that optimism."

No night of big-name green revelry would be complete without Al Gore, and indeed he stole the show, inspiring the less wizened in the crowd to jump up and cheer. He presented the "Courage to Lead" award to Immelt, noting that global warming is posing "a challenge to the moral imagination" of America, and that GE is in the vanguard of companies rising to meet the challenge.

Friedman wrapped up the evening with a nod to the possibility of another Gore presidential run. "We are in a political season and the rules governing columnists at The New York Times is that we are not allowed to endorse presidential candidates," he said from the podium. "But I'm going to break that rule tonight if you promise not to tell anybody: I'd like to nominate Al Gore and Jeff Immelt as the geo-green candidates for 2008!"

Such a pairing of leaders would certainly consummate the marriage of business and environmental goals.

But not everyone is sure it's a match made in heaven.

Gus Speth, one of the founders of both WRI and NRDC and now dean of the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, told Muckraker that to him the evening demonstrated "that WRI has reached some new plateau of engagement with the business community, and that means a good thing and a bad thing, because it means you have the potential to really develop a huge constituency with a very influential group of people, but it also means that you have the potential to get yourself really boxed in on things." In other words, enviros shouldn't get to the point where they only advocate solutions that serve the bottom line, because, of course, not all necessary environmental solutions do.

"In a way, if you cast so much of your energy with the business side, you're making a bet, and you can win big or you can lose big," Speth said. "So I would say [to the green community]: hedge your bets."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: big business, mainstream environmentali

Amanda Griscom Little writes the Muckraker column for Grist Magazine.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Let's Do "our" Share
Posted by: edith on Feb 23, 2007 1:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Notice that when the deluge of publicity about human caused climate change dominated the headlines for a few days recently, that there was little or no discussion about the practical impact and cost on the average working family of drastic cuts in carbon-fuel and energy use. The massive taxes and fuel price hikes that must accompany the ambitious goals of the 70% reductions that greens advocated to make a bit of a dent in CO2 presence in the atmosphere will fall on the working class as long as the corporate monopolies guide the pace and implementation of carbon restrictions.

Corporate profits certainly will not be touched to pay for the significant social costs of compliance with Kyoto and its successors. The take-home pay of the public and its negative savings rate in America, at least, will shrink even further when gasoline, heating oil, electricity, and petroleum derived consumer goods explode.

The consequent recession will reduce consumer demand, cut imports of oil and other products, and perhaps make a bit of a dent in CO2 emissions and almost no dent in the current amounts of CO2 particles in the atmosphere. Corporate and authoritarian control of the dim-witted public will have increased. The MIC and the CCC (Carbon Control Complex) will squash whatever life individual and non-government liberty still exists- all in the name of the Planet(as defined by GE and Halliburton). As usual, Corporate Clown Gore will have done his Master's bidding very well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Let's Do "our" Share Posted by: richholland
Greenies are becoming the new meanies
Posted by: Bobsays on Feb 23, 2007 1:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just watch them: they spent the 1990s jetting around the world on government expense to go to conferences. There air mile log would have made Wallace Simpson blush. Now fast forward to today. They have spend the years since they sparked the anti-globalisations riots getting well and properly squirilled in the dark crevices of the corporate world. And it is paying off big time!

But we need to question this cozy relationship. It is one thing to portray the movement as a motherhood issue, it is quite another to see them happily sign up for massive taxes and restrictions which will hurt the poorest the most. They are on course to flash-freeze society in its current structure, using all sorts of shame-based and tax-induced means to stop people from improving their standard of living. Just watch them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Flathead continues to inspire the Owners
Posted by: eddie torres on Feb 23, 2007 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thomas Friedman as a 'New Dawn' cheerleader / emcee for WRI's 25th anniversary ceremony. Who is that guy's booking agent?

The Owners want to move 'key collateral' to 'an environmentally viable and globally positioned' production zone. Like Las Vegas.

Everyone else gets Soylent Greened.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Embrace & Extinguish
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 23, 2007 9:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Co-Opt |kōˈäpt; ˈkōˌäpt| verb [ trans. ] (often be co-opted) appoint to membership of a committee or other body by invitation of the existing members.
• divert to or use in a role different from the usual or original one : social scientists were co-opted to work with the development agencies.
• adopt (an idea or policy) for one's own use : the green parties have had most of their ideas co-opted by bigger parties.
Co-optation may also refer to the tactic of neutralizing or winning over a minority by assimilating them into the established group or culture..

Money always comes with strings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't follow leaders, watch the parking meters...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Feb 23, 2007 4:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Businesspeople are in business to make money, not to engage in social welfare programs - and anyone who thinks otherwise is probably on way too many drugs.

The problem is that big business interests have taken over the government (which will probably be their undoing in the long run) and gutted all the regulations (otherwise known as laws). If they can't pollute in the US, they do it abroad, and they're certainly not going to voluntarily stop buring coal and oil - just look at the profit margins of Exxon and Chevron last year! You might as well ask Pablo Escobar to stop selling cocaine.

The Department of Energy was originally set up to promote renewable energy; it was swallowed up by the militray-industrial complex long ago. The EPA was set up to provide monitoring and cleanup of environmental pollution; it now actively collaborates with the Bush Administration in gutting clean air laws so that more polluting coal power plants can be built.

The mainstream environmental movements have obviously failed; they are fairly ineffective and isolated in their outlook and beholden to the interests that provide their funding. Coal fired emissions continue to increase every year; pesticide and herbicide use continues to increase; forests and fisheries continue their decline, and business continues as usual.

So slap some more bandaids on that gunshot victim, but make sure the cameras are in place first - you can use the images for your next fundraising drive. But be careful - you don't want to appear too radical - which means don't mention NAFTA and the environmental destruction going on in Third World free-trade export zones, or US foreign policy vis-a-vis Mideastern and African oilfields, or anything controversial.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement