Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Ready, Ames, Fire

By Bill McKibben, Grist.org. Posted February 22, 2007.


People in the Midwest are learning that ethanol will not be enough to fight global warming.

Bill McKibben, an AlterNet guest columnist, is spearheading the Step It Up 2007 campaign. A scholar-in-residence at Middlebury College, McKibben's newest book is the forthcoming Deep Economy: The Wealth of Communities and the Durable Future. His column is reprinted by permission from Grist. For more environmental news and humor sign up for Grist's free email service.

In the first couple of weeks of Step It Up organizing, our map looked a little unbalanced -- lots and lots of actions on the coasts, fewer in between. As we near 700 scheduled rallies, however, that's changing fast -- and on the ground in Ames, Iowa, last night, I got a sense of why.

This is a college town -- Iowa State University is here -- and when organizer Julia Olmstead stood up to give her spiel for a local Step It Up rally, a couple of hundred people signed up on the spot. Iowa is political country, of course -- the presidential candidates for 2008 are already barnstorming through the state. (Didn't we just have an election?) But people here have felt as baffled as most of us around the country about how to make a difference in Washington, D.C.

The politicians who come here pitch the issues relentlessly toward people's supposed self-interest. All come and promise more support for turning corn into ethanol, a process that unfortunately doesn't do much, if anything, for reducing carbon emissions. (And one SUV tankful of corn could feed a person for a year.)

Many Iowans have begun to suspect it's a bit of a scam -- and anyway, they know that their real interest in the long run is served by politicians who will do the right thing for everyone, reducing carbon emissions so it will still be possible to grow corn here a few decades hence.

They've begun to rally around Step It Up as one way to get their congressional delegation on board with real cuts that will matter in real time. It's fun to share their energy -- and the organic pork and Amish-raised chicken at the Methodist Church potluck supper and square dance before last night's event.

And it was fun, too, to ski down Onion Creek in the city's suburbs, flushing deer and enjoying the lengthening days of spring. In fact, across much of the country the weather has turned beautifully wintry in the past week. I left Vermont reluctantly -- we just had the best snowfall in many years, three feet of lovely powder in the woods. After the anxiety-producing heat wave that lasted till mid-January, it's almost as if we're being rewarded for our efforts to actually do something about global warming.

If only it were that easy. But it's worth remembering, even in the heat of organizing, to pay attention to just how lovely the world we're working for really is. Paying witness is one of the jobs our generations have inherited -- the world is as intact and complete right now as it's going to be for a long time to come!

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iowa, ethanol, global warming, stepitup2007, bill mckibben, climate change

Bill McKibben is the author of "The End of Nature" and "Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
We need to stop burning things for energy.
Posted by: fanny666 on Feb 22, 2007 3:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very good points here. We need to get away from burning hydrocarbons and carbohydrates. And it should also be kept in mind that cutting down forests to plant corn fields will also do more harm than good in terms of reducing carbon dioxide via photosynthesis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

there's only one solution to global warming: stop burning coal and oil
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Feb 22, 2007 6:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Attacking ethanol accomplishes what? A far better question is this: how do you make local communities energy-independent without resorting to the use of coal or oil? Is that even possible?

Technically, the answer is yes - but it will require energy conservation, energy efficient technology, solar and wind electricity infrastructure and storage systems, and sustainable agricultural practices. If you can't concieve of a farm that is productive without fossil fuels, than it doesn't matter if they are growing corn for ethanol (15%)or corn for factory farming hogs (55%) or corn for export to Mexico under NAFTA rules (20%).

Instead of articles that explain how the use of coal and oil is frying the planet, we have these endless little hit pieces on biofuels by prominent environmentalists. Obviously greenwashing is a problem, but will attacking biofuels as a concept do anything to prevent or slow global warming? Why not spend the space discussing how coal and oil got us into this mess?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"When Did Noah Build The Ark?"
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 23, 2007 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Before the storm"
-Robert Redford in Spygame

It's gonna get ugly folks, and hydrogen, ethanol and other 'magic bullets' aren't going to give us a quick fix. Kunstler is a bit harsh in his presentation, but has got his facts straight.

Read HERE

Watch a Google Video Interview (in your browser) HERE

Get educated, get out of debt & get ready. It's going to get ugly and the price will be high for those not prepared.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not harsh at all
Posted by: unitedstatesofstupidity on Feb 23, 2007 8:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think this article is harsh at all. There have been far too many PR pieces about the benefits of hydrogen and ethanol fuel as the "way of the future" etc etc... Hydrogen fuel is just stored energy usually from coal or nuclear, and ethanol has been shown as less than carbon neutral.

Lashing out at those who are speaking the truth about these new fuels as being what they are--not much progress--is completely counter-productive. The days of wishful thinking and optimism are over. You can "believe" in ethanol, or hydrogen, or whatever, but look at the real facts people. Oil is going to run out, we all know this. We desperately want an answer to the problem, but having a semi-religious faith in new technologies just because they aren't oil is not doing anyone any good.

Think critically about everything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corn is for eatin'...
Posted by: Blade on Feb 23, 2007 11:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corn is for eatin' damn it. Crop land should not be producing gasoline. Forests should not be cut down for corn for gas. GAWD! I watched tonight at a local WalMart a worker load up about thirty perfectly good roasted chickens in a cart to be thrown out because it was after 9pm. Think of the fuel wasted, as in ethanol production, for the growing of those chickens, the nice hard plastic packaging, the transporting of them, and finally the machine in the back for their disposal. Nation wide, what is the cost of all this? Can't give them away, oh no, fake health regs, but really because Walmart might lose two buyers per day. I remember years ago when the Repubs were against ethanol, reciting all the figures to prove how wasteful its production is, but now, since they can make money at it, and political capital, it's OK? ONLY IN USA CAN THIS IDIOCY GO ON!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sustainable farmers and backyard stills vs. ADM and NAFTA
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Feb 24, 2007 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It used to be, that if a farmer couldn't sell the entire crop, the leftovers could be converted to ethanol via fermentation and distillation - and this was widely done in the 19th century. It beat letting the crop rot on the ground. This was small-scale, independent economic activity, and the ethanol was used for lighting or for running autos.

That was shut down by Standard Oil and Prohibition (i.e. by the Rockefellers and their owned politicians) in order to secure the transportation fuel and chemical production markets for petroleum interests. They've been fighting against the independent farmer ever since (the same people who control Exxon also control ADM). The real problem, the one that Bill McKibben glosses over, is the entire practice of fossil-fuel intensive industrial agriculture and factory farming.

Ethanol that isn't produced via sustainable agricultural practices is entirely different from that which is - the source matters. It's like coffee - was yours grown on a slave labor plantation, or did you get it from an independent local farmer? Was the ethanol distilled using coal, or was solar heating used instead? Simplistic statements condemning ethanol only make the author look ignorant.

As an example of this complexity, take Brazilian sugarcane ethanol which is sustainably produced at low cost - the American Midwestern industrial coal-fired ethanol-corn corporations make sure that Brazil isn't allowed to import their sustainably-produced ethanol to the US! At the same time, they use NAFTA to dump corn in Mexico; now they've cornered the market, driven the small farmer into poverty and landlessness, and are raising prices.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]