Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Can We Create A World Without Waste?

By Andi McDaniel, Conscious Choice. Posted January 9, 2007.


A new movement is working to make manufacturers more accountable by pushing them to stop producing anything that can't be resold, recycled or reused.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Aside from Oscar the Grouch, few people would argue that trash is a good thing. In addition to being stinky, ugly and a pain to lug out to the curb, the detritus of modern life causes problems on a far grander scale. Landfills and incinerators have been linked to a host of human health issues, and as for the environment -- you don't have to be an ecologist to know that lingering piles of plastic, metal and toxic goo are bad news all around.

Yet, we continue to throw things away -- and how could we not? What else would we do with that annoying cellophane packaging? The to-go boxes? The packing peanuts? The after-dinner scraps that even the dog won't touch?

Part of the solution is as simple as a blue bin. Curbside recycling is still an incredibly effective way to save energy and divert tons of plastics, cans and glass away from landfills. Another answer is composting, which would address more than 60 percent of what ends up in residential dumpsters.

But in addition to getting the word out about these tried and true solutions, a new movement is taking a more holistic approach. Rather than focusing solely on what to do with existing waste, the "Zero Waste" movement looks at a product's entire life cycle -- and redirects the conversation toward usable options for every step along the way. The ultimate goal is to eliminate waste as a concept entirely -- a lofty aspiration indeed. But Zero Wasters say loftiness is part of the point -- after all, creating a trash-free world is going to take nothing short of revolution.

Starting from Zero

The idea behind Zero Waste is simple: basically, nothing with a second use should be thrown away. And if something doesn't have a second use, it shouldn't exist. The Berkeley Ecology Center, a West Coast leader in the Zero Waste movement, puts it this way, "If it can't be reduced, reused, repaired, rebuilt, refurbished, refinished, resold, recycled or composted, then it should be restricted, redesigned or removed from production."

While Zero Waste depends on careful attention to what we do or don't toss in our home trashcans, its ultimate task is to take a bigger view of how waste is handled on an industrial level. According to the Grassroots Recycling Network (GRRN), an international Zero Waste advocacy group, "The goal applies to the whole production and consumption cycle -- raw material extraction, product design, production processes, how products are sold and delivered, how consumers choose products and more."

It's one thing to tell consumers to stop throwing banana peels in the trash bin, but quite a larger task to convince industry to adopt Zero Waste. Still, Eric Lombardi, executive director of Eco-Cycle, a Zero Waste-oriented non-profit based in Boulder, Colo., says that industry is more amenable to the concept than you'd think. "Waste is money, and industry gets that better than anyone," he explains. In addition to offering various recycling services, Eco-Cycle consults businesses on how to reduce their overall waste. That means spending time peering into the dumpster, where they'll notice trashed items that could have been avoided through smarter purchasing decisions. "We'll agree to pick up those hard-to-recycle items like computers and plastic bags and shoes," he says, "and then what's left? Mostly junk plastics. That's when we talk with the people who do the purchasing to stop buying the things that end up in the dumpster."

You Make It, You Buy It

Of course, industry interest in Zero Waste isn't generally motivated by goodness of heart. One of the principal tenets of the Zero Waste strategy is Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), which, although new to the United States, is already well established in Europe -- in part due to the pressing problem of limited landfill space. In an article for GreenBiz.com, Guy Crittenden explains, "True EPR connects producers with the downstream fate (and costs) of their products and packaging... [which] drives eco-efficiencies up the value chain, culminating in design for the environment."

The beginnings of an EPR policy in the US are visible in the growing number of landfill bans on toxic products, such as cathode ray tubes, large appliances, tires and electronics. In anticipation of future regulations on waste, some companies are voluntarily devising initiatives for reclaiming their waste, such as Sony's and Apple's takeback recycling programs. Of course, such programs also provide companies with that increasingly precious public relations commodity: green street cred.

At the very least, Zero Wasters are set on halting incentives to make waste. According to GRRN, "Markets today are heavily influenced by tax subsidies and incentives that favor extraction and wasteful industries." It's mainly for this reason -- and not for lack of the appropriate technology -- that waste has persisted, even in the wake of increasing environmental awareness. GRRN estimates that we have the existing technology to redirect 90 percent of what currently ends up in landfills.

Which begs the question: If we didn't send it to landfills, then where would it go? To recycling centers and municipal compost heaps, partly. But Zero Wasters say we shouldn't just be asking how to get rid of our waste. Just as fungi turn rotting logs into fertile growing material, we should be able to do better than piling up our waste and covering it with dirt.

And while it's fun to conceive of wackier and wackier recycled products -- corn husks turned into countertops! pencils made from recycled paper money! water bottles morphed into cozy fleece outerwear! -- Brenda Platt, of the DC-based Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR), stresses the importance of finding the highest use for recyclables, to allay the energy wasted in production. In the case of glass bottles, for example, that would mean refilling them (such as with milk bottles), followed closely by turning them into new bottles, transforming them into art glass, and then maybe making "glassphalt," a material that has been used as an alternative to conventional asphalt since the '70s.

Such efforts can be facilitated by the existence of local "Resource Recovery Parks" where manufacturing and retail businesses share space, equipment and services, as well as reuse, recycling and composting facilities. In some cases, waste from one business becomes a resource for another business within such parks, creating a closed loop.

There's no doubt that Zero Waste is an idealistic -- if not near impossible -- goal. But whether or not it can be done in every instance, says Eric Lombardi, is really beside the point. "Being on the path to zero is the point," explains Lombardi. "Because once you have established zero as the goal -- you being the government, you being a CEO -- then you have a benchmark against which you can measure your future actions."

Perhaps one of those future actions will be recycling your trashcan.


****

Seven simple steps to trashing your trash

Let's face it -- we know better than to dispose when we should be Reusing, Reducing and Recycling. But we're busy, forgetful and, well, does it really make that big of a difference? You know the answer. So clip out these friendly reminders on how to bring your personal waste closer to zero. Just think: you'll never have to take out the trash again!

1. Feed the garden
Think like nature for a moment -- why would you throw away all those food scraps, when they could be transformed into beautiful, nourishing garden compost? Over 60 percent of municipal waste could be composted -- so find a more productive resting place for your banana peels.

2. Have bag, will shop
Of course, this one we know by heart. And it's still true. Carry canvas bags everywhere you go -- put them in your car, tie them to your bike -- and you'll have a final answer to the "paper or plastic" question.

3. Sort it out
Recycling rates have taken a downturn recently. Are we losing faith in the power of recycling? It still works! If you want your recyclables to be put to the highest possible use, sort them well. "Single stream" recyclables -- as opposed to glass bottles mixed with paper -- make for better recycled materials.

4. Think bulk
Brenda Platt of ILSR makes a point of buying groceries in bulk. Rather than buy single-serve applesauce cups for her kids, she opts for the big jar and scoops it into smaller containers herself. Simple? Yes. But simple is key.

5. Positive reinforcement
It's the same technique we use for supporting fair trade companies and organic farms. Support those companies that are making a point to reduce their waste -- and avoid the rest. Eric Lombardi, of Eco-Cycle, says we've got to "reward the recyclers. The clean companies must win the profits."

6. Shrink wrap
What better motivation to waste less than reducing the size of your trash receptacle at home? Substitute a small plastic grocery bag for your trashcan, and wiser purchasing habits will follow naturally.

7. Your Trash, Their Treasure
Repeat after me: there is no "junk," there's only useful stuff yet to find a home. Before you look to the landfill, consider giving your broken fridge or over-lounged loveseat a chance at a happier second life by posting it for giveaway on websites like Freecycle.org or SwapThing.com. And PlanetGreenInc.com will actually buy your spent ink-jets, conked-out laser cartridges and defunct cell phones for their recycle program, giving the money generated to charity.


******

Top Five Trash-free Towns

Searching for a waste-free world? Start looking for property in one of these enlightened locations. They've got big plans for creating less waste.

Berkeley, CA
In Berkeley, the birthplace of curbside recycling, the Berkeley Ecology Center's fleet of recycling trucks runs completely on biodiesel, and Urban Ore, a local for-profit "total recycling" center, rehabs and resells items that people would otherwise pay to send to the landfill.

Boulder, CO/Santa Monica, CA
You won't find trashcans at some weekly farmers' markets in these towns. Santa Monica's Main Street (Sundays only) and Boulder's Zero Waste farmers' markets offer patrons a choice between composting and recycling their waste -- an ultimatum that prompted vendors to offer compostable to-go materials and patrons to bring their own canvas bags.

Seattle, WA
The Wasteless in Seattle program includes bold new measures to reduce waste -- such as mandatory recycling with fines for violations -- and the Take-it-Back Network, which sent 600 tons of computer monitors and other components back to retail stores in 2004.

New Zealand
In 1999, the New Zealand government launched the Zero Waste New Zealand Trust, an initiative that offered $25,000 (NZ) funding to councils that adopted a Zero Waste resolution. Since then, 48 of 74 (66 percent) of all local councils have made the switch.

Germany
In response to a 1991 German packaging law requiring suppliers to take back and recycle up to 70 percent of their packaging, the Green Dot program was created, in which consumers deposit Green Dot-certified packaging refuse in specially designated bins. It then gets picked up and recycled -- all paid for by the manufacturers.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: waste, trash, recycling

Andi McDaniel is a Minneapolis-based freelance writer and regular contributor to Conscious Choice. Her work has appeared in Utne, Ode and Experience Life.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Best idea since sliced bread.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Jan 9, 2007 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is obvious that every manufactured object required human time and natural energy to produce. It would be interesting (to me at least) If somebody would figure out the man/hours and dollars per capita that are wasted in producing and disposing of waste. This figure could then be converted into the amount of free time and money each of us could have with no loss to the economy. Think of it as a free vacation instead of so much extra packaging, etc. On second thought it's better than the sliced bread idea.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

waste not want not...
Posted by: mulchmeister on Jan 9, 2007 7:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Zero Waste is the only responsible way forward. Kudos to those who are teaching, promoting and enabling this to take root. If we are to be honest with ourselves and end our parasitic relationship with the planet and it's precious resources, then we must ALL see waste for what it really is... a misguided fallacy. In nature there is no waste. Even if we throw something away... it does not magically disappear... there is no away. Let's put "waste" where it really belongs... as a term in the history books as a failed human experiment !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Environmental Tax Shifting
Posted by: geotopia on Jan 9, 2007 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article - especially because it points out that, 'According to GRRN, "Markets today are heavily influenced by tax subsidies and incentives that favor extraction and wasteful industries." '
We should be doing just the opposite. Ecological Economics calls for an "Environmental Tax Shift" that would remove taxes from production and, instead, tax extraction and pollution. A short bumper sticker slogan that captures this is, "Tax Waste, Not Work!"
If Congress and state legislatures could fully "get" this one basic concept and follow-up with the Environmental Tax Shift, we would be on the road to a new, resource conserving industrial revolution.
Fortunately, there is a movement afoot to bring about this new Ecological Economics consciousness.
www.earthshift.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ok... but we are still stuck with the problems of..
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jan 9, 2007 8:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.. non-renewable resources, sustainable timber industry, pollution that comes directly from production not what is produced, etc... ad nauseum.

Its a nice thought and all... how possible is this REALLY? Not just how physically possible, but how likely is it to actually get to this kind of situation... or get to it without creating other massive problems for humanity?

The absolute truth we come to is this... industrial production is not sustainable over the long term. Any idea that we can go on much as we have been in our industrial and technological capacities, even with different methods for some aspects, and come to sustainability is a cruel joke.

www.greenanarchy.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Already Implementable
Posted by: RandyCole on Jan 9, 2007 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The aggravating part of all this is that the economics of Zero Waste actually work in many, many, many cases!

Assume it costs 20 cents/pound to collect, haul and convert waste materials into a Fischer-Tropsch Synfuel, and to produce Green Hydrogen from the F-T byproducts. (Obviously that’s not sustainable for MSW, but it’s a bargain for medical waste, HHW, and some industrials wastes).

The energy equivalent of 22,159,909 gallons of gasoline could be derived from 126,500 tons per day of organic waste materials, using (my company’s) advanced gasification (PMD) process. It would take 1,136,406 barrels of crude oil to produce the same amount of fuel.

The cost then for the reuse solution is $50,600,000 ($.20 x 2000 x 126,500) per day. At $60 per barrel, the savings on imported crude is $68,184,334 ($60 x 1,136,406). That’s a gain of $17.5 million per day – even before accounting for the benefits of keeping all those dollars circulating in our own economy instead of being exported to OPEC countries.

I offer this example not just to toot my own horn as it were. There are many manufacturing platforms that can convert spent hydrocarbons into fuels just as easily, and cost effectively as using virgin hydrocarbons but to correct the notion that “Zero Waste is an idealistic -- if not near impossible -- goal.” It is already implementable and taxpayers/shareholders should already be holding elected officials/CEO's accountable.

Randy Cole
Co-Founder & Chief Value Development Officer.
ForeverGreen Enterprises

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Follow the money...
Posted by: mn on Jan 9, 2007 10:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...as always. There are people makes HUGE amounts of money on the present system. And they are not going to change unless they have a gun pointed at them. This is the MAIN JOB of gov't, to ease the pain of having to make changes in society that are the best for the whole. This is specifically why the neo-conservative philosophy is to get rid of gov't, because they are beholden to the people who are making TONS of money off of things that are killing the planet. It's really extremely simple. Unfortunately, the humans have failed this basic civics lesson that's been obvious for at least the past 150 years, so now Mama Nature is getting ready to institute a massive die-off of stupid humans. Probably for the best. This article is great and I recycle my brains out, but recycling and zero waste have nothing to do with the obvious need we have as a species to assassinate the toxic alpha males whose sustenance derives from killing everything that moves. Hard, cold fact.

Manderso Nation

mandersonation.blogspot.com
mikea@nevadacityfreepress.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What One Group Is Doing
Posted by: rileycase on Jan 9, 2007 11:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I serve as chair of the board of our local Rescue Mission, a ministry with a 1.7 million dollar budget (not a penny from tax dollars so we can be free to apply the gospel in every part of life). We deal primarily with lives that others consider to be "wasted," but the whole ministry relates to the title of the article, "A World Without Waste." (by Alternet definitions we are the "religious right") We take food, clothing, furniture, and just about anything and seek to reuse and recycle in order to help people. We serve about 200 meals a day (365 days) mostly with donated food. When we get too much of one thing we share with other Rescue Missions or other ministries. We fix up large and small appliances (a dealer not long ago gave us 300 large applicances due to be dumped, not because many were not usable but he did not have the time or inclination to fix them up for resale). We pick up left-overs from garage sales and rummage sales, usually not because there is enough usable to make it worth while but as a community service on the one hand, and, on the other, to establish the principle that the dumpster is only a last resort. We take things from companies going out of business. We try to find uses for as much as we can. There is almost no interest, for example, for old bowling balls (even to give away) but a local pig farmer discovered pigs like to root bowling balls around in the mud (his pigs have lots of bowling balls). We operate two resale shops but most of what we sort and size and fix is for giving away. An important key to this is to develop a community mentality to reuse and recycle. We get food from restaurants, hospitals, and groceries. Unfortunately, some of the big chains have policies against giving away food (they could get sued--it goes into the dumpster). We get a lot of support even from people who don't agree with us on religious matters because they like what we are doing with our "no waste" philosophy. Meanwhile the city cannot make recycling work because, they say, it is cost prohibative. On trash day lots of good stuff is thrown away (I on occasions pick up people's bags of grass clippings). In order to make "No Waste" work there will need to be a change in the hearts of people. The whole economy thrives on a convenience, throw-away philosophy. Laws may encourage "no waste" but the real key is in a new attitude on the part of individuals (and society). I believe this new attitude comes primarily with a religious philosophy based on the idea that that which is created, people first but ultimately even that which people create, should work for a common good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what about industrial obstacles?
Posted by: DaBear on Jan 9, 2007 11:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice piece--although it sounds awfully like a fluff-piece... the writer appearing in Ode, Utne, ah, yes, fluffage confirmed. However, there are enormous obstacles to overcome like recyclers who insist on only recycling the most basic of items such as non-glossy paper and non-waxed cardboard, clear glass, no metal and only #2 plastics (milk bottles only). Entire cities are having to landfill completely recyclable material because of a trash hauler's refusal to recycle what's actually recyclable (G.I. Industries, for one--which they adamantly deny despite their volumes of policy documents for customers refuting their denials).

Then there are the other "industrial" demons: children. I had to laugh my ass off at #4--I buy bulk too but the reality of those single-serve plastic cups and spoons and baggies is that kids forget to put them back into their reuseable lunch bag/box, leave their reuseable drink bottles on the bus, the floor of the cafeteria (where the "yard duties"--a.k.a. grownups--throw them in the trashcan), or on the sidewalk and you wind up spending five times more on the reuseable container than if you just bought the damned wasteful "disposable" over-packaged crap in the first place. Sure, it's the price to pay for the planet, whatever, but it doesn't eliminate waste and it sure isn't fiscally sound, especially when you add on the replacement cost of higher priced reuseables over time. Kids just don't get it, they try hard but their little brains just forget all the damned time. I love 'em but damn, they're high impact persons!

Then there's access to resueable grade containers to begin with. Whole Foods, for example, insists on this absurd arcane "seasonal item" policy selling reuseable kid-friendly drink bottles only once a year and then they understock them when they do. You can't find those items on the internet because WF disguises or removes the manufacturer's contact info from the product so you can't find anything like that item again. I love the biordegradable corn starch spoons but only one place in all of CA sells them and does so at five times the MSRP! This is the kind of absurdity that we still face. Reusability is the exotic exception not the rule and the manufacturers are patently NOT interested in helping change that, contrary to the fine author's fluffy feel-good assertions. When was the last time you could get a $150 item to last more than it's limited warranty period? How bout a $9.95 item? Probably far less than zero-waste and reusability urges can tolerate.

(pt 2 of the rant to follow)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

industrial obstacles pt 2
Posted by: DaBear on Jan 9, 2007 11:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then try to get one of those manufacturers to actually provide packaging that's efficient and reclaimable... hah! Of 100 items I've purchased in the past year, from tools to containers to you-name-it, only 2 used completely reclaimable packaging. Most items are sold in those damned hermetically sealed unrecyclable plastic blister packs that takes a blowtorch and a chainsaw to cut into (eliminating the ability to return the ultimately poorly made crappy product they outsourced to the Chinese prison labor camps). Sure everything I've bought from Apple generally is one of the more efficient and minimalist, but even then you still have the unrecyclable plastic-foil hybrid pouches and the scads of plastic tape to contain all the cables, plus twisty ties and the #6 styrene G.I. refuses to recycle. Oh, Apple will take them back? Tell that to the 20 year old store manager who laughed in my face and refused to do so at the local Apple store. "We only recycle our actual products not the packaging." Greenwash anyone?

I say no more sunshine articles up our butts about this kind of thing. Zero waste not only should be doable, it should be the goddamned law punishable by loss of the corporation's charter or some other tyrannical hooha penalty (I'd like the right to get my money back plus the frustration and inconvenience equivalent on defective products and overly packaged materials or for all the cuts and scrapes trying to open the Fort Knoxian plastic blister packs, dammit). I'm so very tired of doing five times the work, spending five times the money, performing late night guerilla forced-recycling secret ops to subvert G.I. Industries' absurdist minimal-recycling policies, writing and emailing manufacturers who frankly are all about the greenwash and really don't give a shit, and then having my stack blowup reading fluff pieces by yuppies who didn't really do any muckraking research (because then they'd have higher costs of production for their written word, eh). I'm tired of arguing with school officials and janitors and incessantly nagging my kids over and over about waste and reuse. Zero waste is a nightmare lifestyle but there's no other choice. So don't fluff this issue any more. Dig up dirt, shame the greenwashers and the slipshod quality assurance folks and the "waste disposal" industry and get something done. Otherwise, zero-waster wannabees like me are just going to keep going postal over the serious load of b.s. being shoveled by Utne, Ode, Alternet, et al. on this topic!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: industrial obstacles pt 2 Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: industrial obstacles pt 2 Posted by: lessbread
Here's a better idea. Want biodegradable plastics that can easily be recycled?
Posted by: superfeduphoosier on Jan 9, 2007 7:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hemp is the answer. Yes, plastics can easily be made with the help of hemp instead of oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Choose your products carefully with waste in mind
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Jan 10, 2007 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I stopped shaving my legs and buying cosmetics as a result of being disgusted by the disposability of grooming products. I only buy absolute necessities like toothpaste, soap, shampoo, alcohol. But I no longer buy beautification products like nail polish and mascara because it is all non-recyclable and all landfill. The chemicals we put on our nails and face end up in ground water. The containers fill our landfill with plastics that will last thousands of decades. Think about panty hose (nylons). How many pairs of nylons rip and are "thrown away" every single day in America? Possibly millions. There is no "away." Everything we throw into the earth will come back to haunt us later. If consumers don't buy, companies won't produce.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What I want to see.
Posted by: buh on Jan 10, 2007 7:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These are the types of policies and innovations that are what I've been wanting to see for a long time. Unfortunately, when I read some of the mindsets and practices that need to change, I have a hard time imaginig myself not doing these (wasteful) practices.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

j
Posted by: jmp3954 on Jan 11, 2007 11:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And so what do I do with my used cat litter? I have five cats, and so I pitch about 35 pounds of used litter each Tuesday night. There are six pans (the number of cats plus one, which is what most veterinarians recommend for mult-cat households), and I clean them daily and change them completely once a week.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: j and your five feline friends Posted by: moonbeamdancer25
guess you read a different book
Posted by: mn on Jan 17, 2007 2:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ahh, so you're an anarchist. Very well then. I like anarchy as much as the next guy, but it's not gonna happen anytime soon. I prefer to live in the present. Which is under a fascist ruling class. Which needs to be destroyed. I gave you the means to do it, and you gave me Follow the Yellow Brick Road...M.N.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement