COMMENTS: 30
Can We Create A World Without Waste?
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.
Yet, we continue to throw things away -- and how could we not? What else would we do with that annoying cellophane packaging? The to-go boxes? The packing peanuts? The after-dinner scraps that even the dog won't touch?
Part of the solution is as simple as a blue bin. Curbside recycling is still an incredibly effective way to save energy and divert tons of plastics, cans and glass away from landfills. Another answer is composting, which would address more than 60 percent of what ends up in residential dumpsters.
But in addition to getting the word out about these tried and true solutions, a new movement is taking a more holistic approach. Rather than focusing solely on what to do with existing waste, the "Zero Waste" movement looks at a product's entire life cycle -- and redirects the conversation toward usable options for every step along the way. The ultimate goal is to eliminate waste as a concept entirely -- a lofty aspiration indeed. But Zero Wasters say loftiness is part of the point -- after all, creating a trash-free world is going to take nothing short of revolution.
Starting from Zero
The idea behind Zero Waste is simple: basically, nothing with a second use should be thrown away. And if something doesn't have a second use, it shouldn't exist. The Berkeley Ecology Center, a West Coast leader in the Zero Waste movement, puts it this way, "If it can't be reduced, reused, repaired, rebuilt, refurbished, refinished, resold, recycled or composted, then it should be restricted, redesigned or removed from production."
While Zero Waste depends on careful attention to what we do or don't toss in our home trashcans, its ultimate task is to take a bigger view of how waste is handled on an industrial level. According to the Grassroots Recycling Network (GRRN), an international Zero Waste advocacy group, "The goal applies to the whole production and consumption cycle -- raw material extraction, product design, production processes, how products are sold and delivered, how consumers choose products and more."
It's one thing to tell consumers to stop throwing banana peels in the trash bin, but quite a larger task to convince industry to adopt Zero Waste. Still, Eric Lombardi, executive director of Eco-Cycle, a Zero Waste-oriented non-profit based in Boulder, Colo., says that industry is more amenable to the concept than you'd think. "Waste is money, and industry gets that better than anyone," he explains. In addition to offering various recycling services, Eco-Cycle consults businesses on how to reduce their overall waste. That means spending time peering into the dumpster, where they'll notice trashed items that could have been avoided through smarter purchasing decisions. "We'll agree to pick up those hard-to-recycle items like computers and plastic bags and shoes," he says, "and then what's left? Mostly junk plastics. That's when we talk with the people who do the purchasing to stop buying the things that end up in the dumpster."
You Make It, You Buy It
Of course, industry interest in Zero Waste isn't generally motivated by goodness of heart. One of the principal tenets of the Zero Waste strategy is Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), which, although new to the United States, is already well established in Europe -- in part due to the pressing problem of limited landfill space. In an article for GreenBiz.com, Guy Crittenden explains, "True EPR connects producers with the downstream fate (and costs) of their products and packaging... [which] drives eco-efficiencies up the value chain, culminating in design for the environment."
The beginnings of an EPR policy in the US are visible in the growing number of landfill bans on toxic products, such as cathode ray tubes, large appliances, tires and electronics. In anticipation of future regulations on waste, some companies are voluntarily devising initiatives for reclaiming their waste, such as Sony's and Apple's takeback recycling programs. Of course, such programs also provide companies with that increasingly precious public relations commodity: green street cred.
At the very least, Zero Wasters are set on halting incentives to make waste. According to GRRN, "Markets today are heavily influenced by tax subsidies and incentives that favor extraction and wasteful industries." It's mainly for this reason -- and not for lack of the appropriate technology -- that waste has persisted, even in the wake of increasing environmental awareness. GRRN estimates that we have the existing technology to redirect 90 percent of what currently ends up in landfills.
Which begs the question: If we didn't send it to landfills, then where would it go? To recycling centers and municipal compost heaps, partly. But Zero Wasters say we shouldn't just be asking how to get rid of our waste. Just as fungi turn rotting logs into fertile growing material, we should be able to do better than piling up our waste and covering it with dirt.
And while it's fun to conceive of wackier and wackier recycled products -- corn husks turned into countertops! pencils made from recycled paper money! water bottles morphed into cozy fleece outerwear! -- Brenda Platt, of the DC-based Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR), stresses the importance of finding the highest use for recyclables, to allay the energy wasted in production. In the case of glass bottles, for example, that would mean refilling them (such as with milk bottles), followed closely by turning them into new bottles, transforming them into art glass, and then maybe making "glassphalt," a material that has been used as an alternative to conventional asphalt since the '70s.
Such efforts can be facilitated by the existence of local "Resource Recovery Parks" where manufacturing and retail businesses share space, equipment and services, as well as reuse, recycling and composting facilities. In some cases, waste from one business becomes a resource for another business within such parks, creating a closed loop.
There's no doubt that Zero Waste is an idealistic -- if not near impossible -- goal. But whether or not it can be done in every instance, says Eric Lombardi, is really beside the point. "Being on the path to zero is the point," explains Lombardi. "Because once you have established zero as the goal -- you being the government, you being a CEO -- then you have a benchmark against which you can measure your future actions."
Perhaps one of those future actions will be recycling your trashcan.
****
Seven simple steps to trashing your trash
Let's face it -- we know better than to dispose when we should be Reusing, Reducing and Recycling. But we're busy, forgetful and, well, does it really make that big of a difference? You know the answer. So clip out these friendly reminders on how to bring your personal waste closer to zero. Just think: you'll never have to take out the trash again!
1. Feed the garden
Think like nature for a moment -- why would you throw away all those food scraps, when they could be transformed into beautiful, nourishing garden compost? Over 60 percent of municipal waste could be composted -- so find a more productive resting place for your banana peels.
2. Have bag, will shop
Of course, this one we know by heart. And it's still true. Carry canvas bags everywhere you go -- put them in your car, tie them to your bike -- and you'll have a final answer to the "paper or plastic" question.
3. Sort it out
Recycling rates have taken a downturn recently. Are we losing faith in the power of recycling? It still works! If you want your recyclables to be put to the highest possible use, sort them well. "Single stream" recyclables -- as opposed to glass bottles mixed with paper -- make for better recycled materials.
4. Think bulk
Brenda Platt of ILSR makes a point of buying groceries in bulk. Rather than buy single-serve applesauce cups for her kids, she opts for the big jar and scoops it into smaller containers herself. Simple? Yes. But simple is key.
5. Positive reinforcement
It's the same technique we use for supporting fair trade companies and organic farms. Support those companies that are making a point to reduce their waste -- and avoid the rest. Eric Lombardi, of Eco-Cycle, says we've got to "reward the recyclers. The clean companies must win the profits."
6. Shrink wrap
What better motivation to waste less than reducing the size of your trash receptacle at home? Substitute a small plastic grocery bag for your trashcan, and wiser purchasing habits will follow naturally.
7. Your Trash, Their Treasure
Repeat after me: there is no "junk," there's only useful stuff yet to find a home. Before you look to the landfill, consider giving your broken fridge or over-lounged loveseat a chance at a happier second life by posting it for giveaway on websites like Freecycle.org or SwapThing.com. And PlanetGreenInc.com will actually buy your spent ink-jets, conked-out laser cartridges and defunct cell phones for their recycle program, giving the money generated to charity.
******
Top Five Trash-free Towns
Searching for a waste-free world? Start looking for property in one of these enlightened locations. They've got big plans for creating less waste.
Berkeley, CA
In Berkeley, the birthplace of curbside recycling, the Berkeley Ecology Center's fleet of recycling trucks runs completely on biodiesel, and Urban Ore, a local for-profit "total recycling" center, rehabs and resells items that people would otherwise pay to send to the landfill.
Boulder, CO/Santa Monica, CA
You won't find trashcans at some weekly farmers' markets in these towns. Santa Monica's Main Street (Sundays only) and Boulder's Zero Waste farmers' markets offer patrons a choice between composting and recycling their waste -- an ultimatum that prompted vendors to offer compostable to-go materials and patrons to bring their own canvas bags.
Seattle, WA
The Wasteless in Seattle program includes bold new measures to reduce waste -- such as mandatory recycling with fines for violations -- and the Take-it-Back Network, which sent 600 tons of computer monitors and other components back to retail stores in 2004.
New Zealand
In 1999, the New Zealand government launched the Zero Waste New Zealand Trust, an initiative that offered $25,000 (NZ) funding to councils that adopted a Zero Waste resolution. Since then, 48 of 74 (66 percent) of all local councils have made the switch.
Germany
In response to a 1991 German packaging law requiring suppliers to take back and recycle up to 70 percent of their packaging, the Green Dot program was created, in which consumers deposit Green Dot-certified packaging refuse in specially designated bins. It then gets picked up and recycled -- all paid for by the manufacturers.
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Jan 9, 2007 7:18 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mulchmeister on Jan 9, 2007 7:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: geotopia on Jan 9, 2007 8:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We should be doing just the opposite. Ecological Economics calls for an "Environmental Tax Shift" that would remove taxes from production and, instead, tax extraction and pollution. A short bumper sticker slogan that captures this is, "Tax Waste, Not Work!"
If Congress and state legislatures could fully "get" this one basic concept and follow-up with the Environmental Tax Shift, we would be on the road to a new, resource conserving industrial revolution.
Fortunately, there is a movement afoot to bring about this new Ecological Economics consciousness.
www.earthshift.org
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jan 9, 2007 8:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its a nice thought and all... how possible is this REALLY? Not just how physically possible, but how likely is it to actually get to this kind of situation... or get to it without creating other massive problems for humanity?
The absolute truth we come to is this... industrial production is not sustainable over the long term. Any idea that we can go on much as we have been in our industrial and technological capacities, even with different methods for some aspects, and come to sustainability is a cruel joke.
www.greenanarchy.org
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Ok... but we are still stuck with the problems of..
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» I don't really object to that, but lets not have any illusions...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RandyCole on Jan 9, 2007 9:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Assume it costs 20 cents/pound to collect, haul and convert waste materials into a Fischer-Tropsch Synfuel, and to produce Green Hydrogen from the F-T byproducts. (Obviously that’s not sustainable for MSW, but it’s a bargain for medical waste, HHW, and some industrials wastes).
The energy equivalent of 22,159,909 gallons of gasoline could be derived from 126,500 tons per day of organic waste materials, using (my company’s) advanced gasification (PMD) process. It would take 1,136,406 barrels of crude oil to produce the same amount of fuel.
The cost then for the reuse solution is $50,600,000 ($.20 x 2000 x 126,500) per day. At $60 per barrel, the savings on imported crude is $68,184,334 ($60 x 1,136,406). That’s a gain of $17.5 million per day – even before accounting for the benefits of keeping all those dollars circulating in our own economy instead of being exported to OPEC countries.
I offer this example not just to toot my own horn as it were. There are many manufacturing platforms that can convert spent hydrocarbons into fuels just as easily, and cost effectively as using virgin hydrocarbons but to correct the notion that “Zero Waste is an idealistic -- if not near impossible -- goal.” It is already implementable and taxpayers/shareholders should already be holding elected officials/CEO's accountable.
Randy Cole
Co-Founder & Chief Value Development Officer.
ForeverGreen Enterprises
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mn on Jan 9, 2007 10:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Manderso Nation
mandersonation.blogspot.com
mikea@nevadacityfreepress.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Wow... sexism, violence, and a police state....
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Wow... sexism, violence, and a police state....
Posted by: mn
» RE: Wow... sexism, violence, and a police state....
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Wow... sexism, violence, and a police state....
Posted by: mn
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rileycase on Jan 9, 2007 11:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Jan 9, 2007 11:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then there are the other "industrial" demons: children. I had to laugh my ass off at #4--I buy bulk too but the reality of those single-serve plastic cups and spoons and baggies is that kids forget to put them back into their reuseable lunch bag/box, leave their reuseable drink bottles on the bus, the floor of the cafeteria (where the "yard duties"--a.k.a. grownups--throw them in the trashcan), or on the sidewalk and you wind up spending five times more on the reuseable container than if you just bought the damned wasteful "disposable" over-packaged crap in the first place. Sure, it's the price to pay for the planet, whatever, but it doesn't eliminate waste and it sure isn't fiscally sound, especially when you add on the replacement cost of higher priced reuseables over time. Kids just don't get it, they try hard but their little brains just forget all the damned time. I love 'em but damn, they're high impact persons!
Then there's access to resueable grade containers to begin with. Whole Foods, for example, insists on this absurd arcane "seasonal item" policy selling reuseable kid-friendly drink bottles only once a year and then they understock them when they do. You can't find those items on the internet because WF disguises or removes the manufacturer's contact info from the product so you can't find anything like that item again. I love the biordegradable corn starch spoons but only one place in all of CA sells them and does so at five times the MSRP! This is the kind of absurdity that we still face. Reusability is the exotic exception not the rule and the manufacturers are patently NOT interested in helping change that, contrary to the fine author's fluffy feel-good assertions. When was the last time you could get a $150 item to last more than it's limited warranty period? How bout a $9.95 item? Probably far less than zero-waste and reusability urges can tolerate.
(pt 2 of the rant to follow)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Jan 9, 2007 11:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I say no more sunshine articles up our butts about this kind of thing. Zero waste not only should be doable, it should be the goddamned law punishable by loss of the corporation's charter or some other tyrannical hooha penalty (I'd like the right to get my money back plus the frustration and inconvenience equivalent on defective products and overly packaged materials or for all the cuts and scrapes trying to open the Fort Knoxian plastic blister packs, dammit). I'm so very tired of doing five times the work, spending five times the money, performing late night guerilla forced-recycling secret ops to subvert G.I. Industries' absurdist minimal-recycling policies, writing and emailing manufacturers who frankly are all about the greenwash and really don't give a shit, and then having my stack blowup reading fluff pieces by yuppies who didn't really do any muckraking research (because then they'd have higher costs of production for their written word, eh). I'm tired of arguing with school officials and janitors and incessantly nagging my kids over and over about waste and reuse. Zero waste is a nightmare lifestyle but there's no other choice. So don't fluff this issue any more. Dig up dirt, shame the greenwashers and the slipshod quality assurance folks and the "waste disposal" industry and get something done. Otherwise, zero-waster wannabees like me are just going to keep going postal over the serious load of b.s. being shoveled by Utne, Ode, Alternet, et al. on this topic!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» response to industrial obstacles rant...
Posted by: mulchmeister
» RE: industrial obstacles pt 2
Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: industrial obstacles pt 2
Posted by: lessbread
Comments are closed-
Posted by: superfeduphoosier on Jan 9, 2007 7:10 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Here's an even better idea: cow poo plastic
Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: Here's an even better idea: cow poo plastic
Posted by: lessbread
» HEMP is a completely SUSTAINABLE solution
Posted by: mulchmeister
Comments are closed-
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Jan 10, 2007 6:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» In the interest of shaved legs... might I suggest...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: In the interest of shaved legs... might I suggest...
Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» Well, there is an interesting question there of ...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: buh on Jan 10, 2007 7:48 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jmp3954 on Jan 11, 2007 11:09 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: j and your five feline friends
Posted by: moonbeamdancer25
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mn on Jan 17, 2007 2:21 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Jan 9, 2007 7:18 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mulchmeister on Jan 9, 2007 7:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: geotopia on Jan 9, 2007 8:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We should be doing just the opposite. Ecological Economics calls for an "Environmental Tax Shift" that would remove taxes from production and, instead, tax extraction and pollution. A short bumper sticker slogan that captures this is, "Tax Waste, Not Work!"
If Congress and state legislatures could fully "get" this one basic concept and follow-up with the Environmental Tax Shift, we would be on the road to a new, resource conserving industrial revolution.
Fortunately, there is a movement afoot to bring about this new Ecological Economics consciousness.
www.earthshift.org
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jan 9, 2007 8:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its a nice thought and all... how possible is this REALLY? Not just how physically possible, but how likely is it to actually get to this kind of situation... or get to it without creating other massive problems for humanity?
The absolute truth we come to is this... industrial production is not sustainable over the long term. Any idea that we can go on much as we have been in our industrial and technological capacities, even with different methods for some aspects, and come to sustainability is a cruel joke.
www.greenanarchy.org
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Ok... but we are still stuck with the problems of..
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» I don't really object to that, but lets not have any illusions...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RandyCole on Jan 9, 2007 9:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Assume it costs 20 cents/pound to collect, haul and convert waste materials into a Fischer-Tropsch Synfuel, and to produce Green Hydrogen from the F-T byproducts. (Obviously that’s not sustainable for MSW, but it’s a bargain for medical waste, HHW, and some industrials wastes).
The energy equivalent of 22,159,909 gallons of gasoline could be derived from 126,500 tons per day of organic waste materials, using (my company’s) advanced gasification (PMD) process. It would take 1,136,406 barrels of crude oil to produce the same amount of fuel.
The cost then for the reuse solution is $50,600,000 ($.20 x 2000 x 126,500) per day. At $60 per barrel, the savings on imported crude is $68,184,334 ($60 x 1,136,406). That’s a gain of $17.5 million per day – even before accounting for the benefits of keeping all those dollars circulating in our own economy instead of being exported to OPEC countries.
I offer this example not just to toot my own horn as it were. There are many manufacturing platforms that can convert spent hydrocarbons into fuels just as easily, and cost effectively as using virgin hydrocarbons but to correct the notion that “Zero Waste is an idealistic -- if not near impossible -- goal.” It is already implementable and taxpayers/shareholders should already be holding elected officials/CEO's accountable.
Randy Cole
Co-Founder & Chief Value Development Officer.
ForeverGreen Enterprises
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mn on Jan 9, 2007 10:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Manderso Nation
mandersonation.blogspot.com
mikea@nevadacityfreepress.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Wow... sexism, violence, and a police state....
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Wow... sexism, violence, and a police state....
Posted by: mn
» RE: Wow... sexism, violence, and a police state....
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Wow... sexism, violence, and a police state....
Posted by: mn
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rileycase on Jan 9, 2007 11:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Jan 9, 2007 11:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then there are the other "industrial" demons: children. I had to laugh my ass off at #4--I buy bulk too but the reality of those single-serve plastic cups and spoons and baggies is that kids forget to put them back into their reuseable lunch bag/box, leave their reuseable drink bottles on the bus, the floor of the cafeteria (where the "yard duties"--a.k.a. grownups--throw them in the trashcan), or on the sidewalk and you wind up spending five times more on the reuseable container than if you just bought the damned wasteful "disposable" over-packaged crap in the first place. Sure, it's the price to pay for the planet, whatever, but it doesn't eliminate waste and it sure isn't fiscally sound, especially when you add on the replacement cost of higher priced reuseables over time. Kids just don't get it, they try hard but their little brains just forget all the damned time. I love 'em but damn, they're high impact persons!
Then there's access to resueable grade containers to begin with. Whole Foods, for example, insists on this absurd arcane "seasonal item" policy selling reuseable kid-friendly drink bottles only once a year and then they understock them when they do. You can't find those items on the internet because WF disguises or removes the manufacturer's contact info from the product so you can't find anything like that item again. I love the biordegradable corn starch spoons but only one place in all of CA sells them and does so at five times the MSRP! This is the kind of absurdity that we still face. Reusability is the exotic exception not the rule and the manufacturers are patently NOT interested in helping change that, contrary to the fine author's fluffy feel-good assertions. When was the last time you could get a $150 item to last more than it's limited warranty period? How bout a $9.95 item? Probably far less than zero-waste and reusability urges can tolerate.
(pt 2 of the rant to follow)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Jan 9, 2007 11:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I say no more sunshine articles up our butts about this kind of thing. Zero waste not only should be doable, it should be the goddamned law punishable by loss of the corporation's charter or some other tyrannical hooha penalty (I'd like the right to get my money back plus the frustration and inconvenience equivalent on defective products and overly packaged materials or for all the cuts and scrapes trying to open the Fort Knoxian plastic blister packs, dammit). I'm so very tired of doing five times the work, spending five times the money, performing late night guerilla forced-recycling secret ops to subvert G.I. Industries' absurdist minimal-recycling policies, writing and emailing manufacturers who frankly are all about the greenwash and really don't give a shit, and then having my stack blowup reading fluff pieces by yuppies who didn't really do any muckraking research (because then they'd have higher costs of production for their written word, eh). I'm tired of arguing with school officials and janitors and incessantly nagging my kids over and over about waste and reuse. Zero waste is a nightmare lifestyle but there's no other choice. So don't fluff this issue any more. Dig up dirt, shame the greenwashers and the slipshod quality assurance folks and the "waste disposal" industry and get something done. Otherwise, zero-waster wannabees like me are just going to keep going postal over the serious load of b.s. being shoveled by Utne, Ode, Alternet, et al. on this topic!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» response to industrial obstacles rant...
Posted by: mulchmeister
» RE: industrial obstacles pt 2
Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: industrial obstacles pt 2
Posted by: lessbread
Comments are closed-
Posted by: superfeduphoosier on Jan 9, 2007 7:10 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Here's an even better idea: cow poo plastic
Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: Here's an even better idea: cow poo plastic
Posted by: lessbread
» HEMP is a completely SUSTAINABLE solution
Posted by: mulchmeister
Comments are closed-
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Jan 10, 2007 6:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» In the interest of shaved legs... might I suggest...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: In the interest of shaved legs... might I suggest...
Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» Well, there is an interesting question there of ...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: buh on Jan 10, 2007 7:48 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jmp3954 on Jan 11, 2007 11:09 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: j and your five feline friends
Posted by: moonbeamdancer25
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mn on Jan 17, 2007 2:21 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
California Carbon Trading Allows Timber Companies to Sell CO2 Credits for Their Worst Logging Practices
How to Answer the Dumb Things Climate Deniers Say




