Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

'Precocious Puberty' Is on the Rise

By Kim Ridley, Ode. Posted January 6, 2007.


Hormone-mimicking chemicals found in food, water, and many consumer goods may well be the cause of why children as young as eight are showing signs of sexual development.
Advertisement

Kids these days are growing up too fast -- in more ways than one. American girls are reaching puberty up to a year earlier than in previous generations, with some children showing signs of sexual development as young as age 3. In extreme cases, girls are budding breasts before they’ve even learned to read.

Researchers call this phenomenon "precocious puberty," which some say is on the rise. Forty-eight percent of African-American girls and 15 percent of Caucasian girls show physical signs of puberty by age 8, according to a study of 17,000 U.S. girls published in Pediatrics in 1997. In a subsequent study of more than 2,000 boys, lead author Marcia Herman-Giddens found that 38 percent of African-American boys and 30 percent of Caucasian boys showed signs of sexual development by age 8.

What’s going on? Although scientists have yet to prove definitive causes, many suspect that hormone-mimicking chemicals, obesity and stress all contribute to precocious puberty. The chemicals, often called endocrine disruptors, are of particular concern because they’re everywhere -- in food, water, personal-care products, some plastics and many consumer goods.

Pediatrician Darshak Sanghavi notes in The New York Times that outbreaks of precocious puberty are most often traced to accidental exposure to drugs in hormone-laden products. He describes a case in which a kindergarten-age boy and his younger sister had both begun growing pubic hair. In addition, the boy was exhibiting aggressive behaviour.

When Sanghavi's colleagues examined the children, they discovered that both had extremely elevated levels of testosterone -- equivalent to those of an adult male -- and that their father was using a concentrated testosterone skin cream "for cosmetic and sexual purposes." The children had absorbed the testosterone from normal skin contact with their father.

It’s a problem that’s not likely to go away anytime soon. The New York Times notes that prescriptions for products containing testosterone are on the rise, doubling to more than 2.4 million between 2000 and 2004.

Of course, we can’t blame it all on testosterone. Phthalates, ubiquitous industrial plasticizers common in everything from personal-care products to vinyl and plastic packaging, mimic estrogen. So do compounds in some pesticides and flame retardants. A growing body of evidence suggests that these and other endocrine-disrupting chemicals can interfere with sexual development, an idea widely introduced in the groundbreaking book "Our Stolen Future" by Theo Colburn, Diane Dumanoski, and John Peterson Myers.

In the two decades since the book’s publication, evidence has mounted that substantiates its main thesis. The September, 2006 issue of Alternative Medicine points out that a number of human studies have found possible links between endocrine disruptors and early puberty. One study found that Puerto Rican girls whose breasts developed earlier were three times more likely to have elevated levels of phthalate esters in their blood. Another reported that girls who had been accidentally exposed in the womb to polybrominated biphenyls -- common flame retardants containing compounds that mimic estrogen -- began menstruating a year earlier than a control group.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: puberty, testosterone, endocrine disruptors

Kim Ridley is co-editor of "Signs of Hope: In Praise of Ordinary Heroes." She writes about people creating positive social change for Ode Magazine.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
foul
Posted by: rsaxto on Jan 6, 2007 12:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our USA society is in such foul condition that we are all sucking on drugs whether we want to or not. The earth is being poisoned by corporate criminals and our current government does nothing about it because it has been bought by the criminals. We need to impeach or otherwise eliminate the criminals at the top of government before the criminals at the top of government eliminate health, safety and decency from our society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: foul Posted by: deepsquid
» RE: foul Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: foul Posted by: bonzi
» RE: foul Posted by: kathat
» RE: foul Posted by: b4upoo
» RE: foul Posted by: rsaxto
» RE: foul Posted by: Dboy
» RE: foul Posted by: purplelotus13
» Re: Pent! Posted by: WizardofArmaggedon
It's not just the mystery stuff, either...
Posted by: Joyleaf on Jan 6, 2007 3:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have you read about the mares whose urine provided the estrogen necessary for Premarin and other hormone replacement therapies? The amount of estrogen that passes out in their urine is sufficient to make medications for menopausal women.

Now think about other things--the father's testosterone cream, birth control pills, bovine growth hormone, etc.--which are also washing into our waterways. Hormones have been accumulating in public water as we eat, medicate with and urinate away very substantial amounts of garden variety hormones. When you add to that the slew of chemicals which disrupt or emulate hormones, you have a real mess on your hands.

Was it the Potomac that showed a shocking number of intersexed wildlife due to outrageous levels of hormones and hormone emulators in the water? In any case, the example was extreme but not isolated.

A lot stays in our water. When throwing something away, it's important to destroy the illusion that there is some safe place ("away") where this stuff goes. What we use, consume and dispose of stays with us. All those chemicals with the scary warning labels have a good chance of washing straight down the drain and into our bodies.

(For a very amusing story, you might consider Googling a report that came out about an Italian river which was tested to see if estimates of cocaine use could be confirmed in some way by essentially putting the river through a piss test. The results were surprising--they found that based on the river, people in the area were consuming something like 40 times as much cocaine as previously estimated.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Premarin='PREgnant MARe urINe' Posted by: medstudgeek
Correction
Posted by: Jabby on Jan 6, 2007 4:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Important article about an important topic. But *Our Stolen Future* was published in 1996, not "two decades ago." (Important error!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lina Medina
Posted by: cannibalicious! on Jan 6, 2007 5:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
» RE: Lina Medina Posted by: Basenjis
early developer here....
Posted by: paintbrush on Jan 6, 2007 7:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm curious...did anyone out there have a precocious puberty of their own? I went through puberty starting at age 7, menstruating by age 8. I'm 29 now and I've never had any reproductive health problems, other than very long but predictable cycles (6-8 weeks), which I'm not convinced is really a problem. All my hormone levels have consistently tested normal, and I've never particularly felt like a freak. I wonder what these precocious puberties are going to mean for kids as they grow up, if anything? I have a pretty vested interest in finding out....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: early developer here.... Posted by: sasha40
» RE: early developer here.... Posted by: Nheduanna
Who says it has to be because of chemicals?
Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle on Jan 6, 2007 7:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It could be just our warmer climate. I'm in New England and it's over 60 degrees today (January 6). That could start get any kid's juices surging early.

Not that I believe in that "greenhouse gas" crap!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So what you are saying... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: So what you are saying... Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
» RE: So what you are saying... Posted by: albrechtkrausse
Super race of christian funda-mental-less coming?
Posted by: nim on Jan 6, 2007 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hitler would have been beside himself with joy had he been aware of the possiblity of inducing puberty into single digit aged children. Now the threat is from the christian (christian?) funda-mental-less zealots who are already working to change small children into "warriors for God" as at Jesus Camp and other places. D. James Kennedy, top level Dominionist, advocates the elimination of the public school system. Have you wondered why? The kiddies would be taught a christian (?) curriculum at home, free from social influences such as art, history, tolerance, science, etc. The funda-mental-less are already sex obessed and the zealots among them will be delighted to learn that they can chemically induce puberty into their tiny brainwashed "warriors". It'll give the little guys and gals something more to fight for!!! Is a Sun Myung Moon massive wedding for four-year-olds just over the horizon?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Future
Posted by: anothername on Jan 6, 2007 7:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, a technical correction. Lupron should be identified as having 26 known side effects. I also want to thank AlterNet and Ode for running this item as the topic receives too little news coverage.

I had read and heard of the problem in girls, but had been wondering if boys were experiencing problems, too. I also wonder what we are going to find in the decades ahead.

As we have girls maturing earlier, are the women going to discover they hit menopause earlier? Is the increase in medications for Attention Deficit Disorder and the use of Ritalin so often related to aggression due to environmental testosterone?

What are the educators and child psychologists saying about discussions of sex and sexual features as “the talk” cannot be delayed into the teenage years? Will younger and younger girls need to learn how to stand up for themselves as eyes move to budding breasts at a younger and younger age?

I have only heard/read of early puberty as an individual problem, but it has significant consequences for society now and in the decades to come.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Future Posted by: djnoll
an epidemic of testo-girls
Posted by: Don Garb on Jan 6, 2007 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are 2 girls and they both gain 20 pounds. The first one stores the weight on her hips, thighs and butt. The second one stores it on the front of her stomach. That's because the first girl is estrogen dominant and the second girl is testosterone dominant. Take a real close look around you. How many testosterone dominant young girls are there out there? They were almost non-existent when I was growing up, now they are everywhere.

There are xeno-estrogens in the environment (alien or foreign) that get into a woman's body in REALLY high doses, like when you microwave food in contact with plastic for instance. The woman's brain says "Whoa, WAY too much estrogen, turn up the testosterone!" But xeno-estrogens don't do anything except LOOK like estrogen, so the woman has overreacted to the other side.

Now the woman has too much testosterone, so she gains weight, because fat cells manufacture estrogen. If you're an overweight testo-woman, then don't let any of your food ever touch plastic, especially in combination with heat. Take up a vegetarian like diet. You can still eat meat but also eat lots of tofu, yams, broccoli, beans, nuts and seeds. Those all contain phyto-estrogens (plant made) which is an estrogen that really works. This will reduce your brain's need for estrogen and you will lose the fat cells. If you're on the pill then ask your doctor about changing to one that's high in progesterone.

I've been telling people about this stuff for years and they think I'm crazy. You decide for yourself: look at every female you see and note where the fat is deposited on her body. Look very closely ...

and you will see!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Details? Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: Details? Posted by: Don Garb
» RE: Details? Posted by: MartianBachelor
Controlled Study- puberty six months earlier in fluoridated areas
Posted by: plantland on Jan 6, 2007 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The above study was only about the age at which GIRLS STARTED HAVING MENSES.You can find a link to a host of studies concerning fluoridated water and the endocrine system at www.fluoridealert.org

Use internet explorer if you are an AOL user- site is inexplicably blocked in AOL.

While I hope that future enlightened state and federal governments will look at production, dispersal, and disposal of particular chemicals, I think that the simplest thing that can be done to eliminate one factor in what is surely a synergistic process is ceasing the addition of fluoride to public water systems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

other factors
Posted by: bannelee on Jan 6, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I didn't know about the chemicals,but it makes sense.They didn't mention outside factors though,such as TV shows for young kids,with the goal of the girls in "getting" the boy.The clothes for kids are bad,too.I can remember looking for a 2-piece bathing suit for my toddler because she grew too fast for a 1-piece.All of the 2-piece's had legs cut up to the waist!!! For a kid in diapers??!! Need i even mention the biggest thing for little girls?It's the Bratz dolls-dressed like night clubbers with too much make-up and too short skirts.Frightening.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: other factors Posted by: bonzi
G.I.G.O. in our Brave New World.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 6, 2007 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hormone-mimicing chemicals in the environment are having an effect on precocious puberty, but don't leave out the mind-body connection, either.

Listened to the lyrics of rap and hip-hop music lately? This "music" (melodically it barely qualifies), so popular with preteens to twenty-somethings of all races but predominately blacks (note the higher percentage of precocious puberty in black teens), is laced with references to adult sexuality, some of it very kinky (and misogynistic). Hammer this junk into young brains incessantly at 120 decibels and it has to have an effect. Add in film and television entertainment that is, more often than not, highly sexually charged (even some cable TV programming is close to soft porn), and our kids are being flooded with triggers for early sexual development nearly 24/7. We are what we eat, but we also are what we think and feel.

The saddest aspect of this pop culture deluge, from rap to lowest-common-denominator entertainment, is that it is being produced solely for the most cynical of reasons (but the only reward of "free-market" capitalism): money. Profit, any way you can get it, and to hell with the result.

Parents are told to "just say no," to keep their kids from such influences; but with these influences being all-pervasive, this simply is not possible. So get used to nine-year-olds with pubic hair and ten-year-olds risking pregnancy. This is the new reality borne of a laissez-faire economic system.

Yessir, folks; it is a Brave New World we're stumbling into.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yes
Posted by: ladyoracle on Jan 6, 2007 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was thinking the same thing, just that this may not actually be a crisis, and to make it big deal is probably an emotional decision on the parts of parents and doctors and not really something related to actual health risks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No Posted by: purplelotus13
» RE: yes Posted by: monkeywrench
don't you need a Rx for hormones??
Posted by: kathat on Jan 6, 2007 9:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes ideedy you do. Aren't you warned that it can pass to a baby from a nursing mother? Yes again.
But apparantly its ok to pass to humans from animals who are fed it. Why? Because Monsanto says so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» They're poisoning the milk!!! Posted by: geoff_canuck
» RE: They're poisoning the milk!!! Posted by: purplelotus13
A larger younger population?
Posted by: tomsager on Jan 6, 2007 11:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also consider that the sex ratio at birth has changed - a larger percentage of births are female - also thought to be caused by hormone disruptors. Together, more girls developing earlier means a larger, younger population. This could be a survival mechanism of a species subjected to environmental and other forms of stress.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A larger younger population? Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: A larger younger population? Posted by: MartianBachelor
» addendum Posted by: MartianBachelor
Get a goat.
Posted by: WitchyNy on Jan 6, 2007 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can have nothing added-goat milk cheese and milk from your own goat. Grow your own garden-no chemicals.
Raise your own fee-range-chickens for eggs.
Grind your own (organic) wheat and bake your own bread.
Until we change...the government/industry complex will not change. If you live in the city-demand they change zoning and allow community farms-gardens.
All this is also exercise for the children.
There will still be some impurities-due to pollution, but what a difference- in so many ways. Don't eat meat-Eat the Rich instead.
Oh yes...and shoot your TV.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Get a goat. Posted by: Basenjis
One important documented problem with a long menstrual lifetime
Posted by: jparsons on Jan 6, 2007 12:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A woman's overall lifetime exposure to estrogen is directly related to her breast cancer risk.

Women eating Western diets high in rich foods start earlier, finish later, have fewer children and breastfeed them for a shorter time, all of which mean that they are fertile (high in estrogen) for a far longer time than in more basic societies.

Even in Japan and other Asian countries, with a simpler diet, the resulting reduction of estrogen levels result in a marked reduction in breast cancer.

See studies by Dr T Colin Campbell if you want full documentation of this point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jan 6, 2007 1:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And how many things like this must we hear about before we actually start to question not just individual technologies, but see them as a web of development all interdependant on others and finally begin to question the value of high technology itself?

www.greenanarchy.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And Posted by: Dboy
» RE: And Posted by: Basenjis
Why not push to market FLAX LIGAN heavily?
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 6, 2007 2:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That alone will get the testosterone level to normal. I eat FLAX PLUS CEREAL a lot and the DHT levels are down and I can still be a man and be proud of it !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHAT PRICE CONVENIENCE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jan 6, 2007 3:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Food additives, synthetics, hormones,sprays ,instant & prepared foods just for starters have changed everthing and maybe not for the better. Babies are sorrounded by plastic from day one. Everything used to be cotton. And then there was fresh air. They also took up more of a mother's time. We make a trade with the best of intentions. Life is easier than it was for our grandmothers. Maybe it's time to modify some things. But we need modern medicine. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WHAT PRICE CONVENIENCE Posted by: Krain61
» But we NEED modern medicine... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
We could stop it!But we never will stand together!
Posted by: Krain61 on Jan 7, 2007 3:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Think about it this way: We get up in the morning and get our shower{Fluoride and chlorine}turns to a gas and fluoride is a form of toxic waste..No use what so ever..Then we go eat our eggs and bacon which both animals are feed things to make them grow fast and no naturaly.Come lunch we eat burgers at mickyD's or booggerking which has more of the same plus preservative..Kinda like when they preserve your body after your dead! We have our pop and soda's and them sipper rolls around and we eat more of this chemical laden stuff which was grown with hormones and fungicide herbicide and pesticides..There is 15,000 chemicals they don't have to list on the labels of your food..15 Thousand Chemicals..
One hundred years ago the cancer rate was 1 in 100 and today it's 1 in 10..You can't drive the hy-ways during planting season with out ingesting some of the crap they spray for bugs ..If you smell it it's in your body..They make a big deal about smokers and non smokers but who is protecting us from second hand chemical use..If we stopped using it they would stop making it..If we don't start buying natural foods the big companies with keep squeezing the little guys out who supply the non-chemical food..We are the only country in the world that uses Fluoride in our water..Anyone one who says that it can't have something to do with how were poisoning our food and water{whether it's though growing seeds or live stock or processing either} through these acts is just being ignorant..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OUTSTANDING ARTICLE....Moreover...
Posted by: ekipnrut on Jan 7, 2007 3:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The links speaks for themselves, elaborating on the article
and underscoring the racist dimension of the issue both in
USA and abroad.

linked text


linked text

Also Gay Daly has an excellent article ...Bad Chemistry....
in the Winter 2006 (online) pub of the NRDC :onearth
The Wiki paragraph above on the global international aspects
should be read in tandem with the December 13 2006
npr(online) interview of Vandana Shiva by Amy Goodman.
Remember, fresh water is becoming an increasingly
unavailable critical resource.
...On another plane..I wonder how all of these exponentially
growing and interlocking crises relate to the Dawkins/Harris
et al position of 'Science as Saviour', in the sense of it serv-
ing as a 21st Century Delphi source of sound rational
direction.
ALL of this stuff is the RESULT of Science and its 'colleague':
Technology....when it comes to track records...let he who is
free of possible planet wrecking screw ups cast the first
stone!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Have Noticed This Also...
Posted by: grumble-bum on Jan 7, 2007 7:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a still-young man, I spend my fair share of time enjoying the myriad female forms around me, but over recent years I have been noticing this trend in young women's body types with some concern. It seems (from completely subjective "analysis" on my part & some peers) that my generation (roughly Mid-Nineteen-Seventies) is perhaps the last one where the "normal" female physique described above could be said to be the "norm". With each successive generational group, I'm seeing a seemingly greater proportion of girls with what I would describe as "guy-shapes"; pronounced pot-bellies, shoulders comparatively wider than the hips, & perhaps most striking - "love-handles" (this in particular seems almost pandemic). Another trend that I have noticed is that the younger a woman, the taller she tends to be. It doesn't seem uncommon for me to regularly meet women in their teens to early twenties who are over 6 feet tall!

Conversely, during the same span of time, I've also noticed that boys seem to be exhibiting more "female" traits as well (wider hips & more than "normal" amounts of fat storage in the chest), although for a long time I dismissed this as a result of general inactivity. For the record, I think it could be said that I personally exhibit these traits in build & fat placement more than men of say, my father's generation, but less than many men younger than I.

Until I read this article I was beginning to wonder if my friends & I were just somehow losing our collective minds. I am grateful in particular to this poster for bringing up this aspect of the problems outlined in the actual article.

I should also note, before someone gets pissed off, that I hardly suffer from some sort of "Barbie" complex. I love the female form in all it's usual natural permutations, & in fact am probably most strongly attracted to naturally "boyish" women. But I don't think these more recent trends (on both sides of the seemingly narrowing sexual divide) are "natural" in any way.

I suppose that a positive, "Scientifiction", spin on all this would be that as Humanity begins to look more & more similar sexually, we will eventually evolve into a species that is less & less crippled by gender-bias.

But to this observer, this seems like yet another symptom of just how badly (possibly irrevocably) we have screwed up our natural world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We can't help them until Congress cooperates
Posted by: Barbie98765 on Jan 8, 2007 6:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why you ask....simple... the Agribusiness has bought Congress and will not allow consumers to know whether or not the food they buy has hormones or any other facts that might prevent us from buying their products no matter how bad they may be for our children.

They even got a law passed that anyone who tries to enter their premises for the animals protection be labeled a, "Tererorist"!!!!!!!!

What they are hiding should be brought to the light and examined. As well as a Congress that needs to protect the PUBLIC as their job IS PUBLIC SERIVCE!

Maybe it will happen with a Democratic Congress...our lives depend on it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

H G Wells wrote about this
Posted by: fred_53_99 on Jan 8, 2007 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
H G wells 's Food of the GOds. The food made animals lagre. The people that ate the animals grew large. We feed our animals hormones, we eat them we get the harmones. But then that makes too much sense for our goverment to understand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THIS IS NOT NEW NEWS
Posted by: sharonJ on Jan 8, 2007 10:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been reading about this problem for decades and still nothing is ever done, thanks to a chickenshit congress. Meat, milk, and dairy products are NOT labeled so there is no way to know if they contain BGH. And if a dairy wants to say on its milk carton that the milk comes from non-BGH cows, the government makes them take that info off the label. We're being poisoned so the CEO's can keep getting richer (and they funnel some of that $$ right back to congress as a reward).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On the rise?
Posted by: fanny666 on Jan 8, 2007 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article cites no evidence that early puberty is on the rise.

It is estimated that 4-5% of girls (less data available for boys) experience this phenomemon. Is that more than 50 years ago? I have not seen data to support that.

It's entirely possibe that it has as much to do with genetics and body mass as it does with food additives and growth hormones in cattle, etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Review article Posted by: fanny666
Daily chemicals
Posted by: arbonnegirl on Jan 20, 2007 3:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I didn't realize that there were estrogen mimicing chemicals in most of our household products. I have found a company that doesn't have animal by products and avoids the chemicals that mimic estrogen which is part of the problem with our bodies.

for more information:
www.lifesambiance.myarbonne.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]