Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Readers Write: The Power of the Sun
Also in Environment
Living Without a Car: My New American Responsibility
Andrew Lam
Lightning Strikes: Get Used to Catastrophic Wildfires and Worse
Scott Thill
Why Our Food Waste May Be Our Greatest Asset
Ruben Anderson
The Three Biggest Myths the Bush Administration Wants You to Believe About Offshore Drilling
Faiz Shakir
Corn, Incorporated: The Ethanol Scam
Nicole Colson
Let's Kick Nuclear Power out of the Climate Change Debate
Linda Gunter
Editor's Note: Author Travis Bradford gave his response to our readers' questions and comments.
Basically everyone except Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., knows global warming is a serious problem. But what to do about it is not so clear-cut.
We recently published an interview that David Roberts did with Travis Bradford, author of "Solar Revolution: The Economic Transformation of the Global Energy Industry," and it stirred a lot of comments from our readers.
Bradford advocates for a solar-powered future. Not only is solar a clean energy alternative, but, he argues, it will be the first ever competitor for utility companies.
Solar, in combination with wind and geothermal, Bradford predicts, will make the need for coal obsolete.
Many AlterNet readers agreed that solar energy is an important renewable to consider. But not all thought the technology was the sure thing that Bradford insists and most comments debated him on the issue of decentralizing power and where biofuels stand in the equation.
Bradford boldly states that "coal is the enemy of the human race," which many readers supported. Thoughtcriminal wrote:
The most polluting and disastrous industry in the United States is the coal business -- the evidence is obvious, from the actions of Massey coal in mountaintop removal in the Appalachians to the damaged water on Hopi and Navajo reservations in the Southwest, to the open-pit mines of Montana. Billions of tons of CO2 are injected every year into the atmosphere from coal-fired electricity generation in the United States and China, along with sulfur, nitrogen oxides, mercury and arsenic.
Another reader from West Virginia (where Massey Energy does their dirty work) agreed that those who live close to coal extraction and processing areas bear a heftier burden for our energy needs.
"It's very rare for a discussion of these issues to take into account all of the costs of coal -- the subsidies are enormous, and hidden and unjust," the West Virginian writes. But also adds, "I'd love to believe that a solar revolution is inevitable, but is there enough silicon? What about the problem of intermittency? Major steps toward conservation and efficiency will no doubt be critical."
Indeed, the interview doesn't delve much at all into the potential problems that solar will have to overcome in order to be a true contender.
As HeroesAll writes, "The problem most often mentioned with regard to renewables is reliability: wind doesn't always blow, sun doesn't always shine ... Another issue, especially if you've got diverse plants, whether solar or wind, is the loss of power over distance."
Part of that problem can be solved with "a high-voltage DC line that doesn't have the same problems as the high-voltage AC line, so it can carry the power over great distances," the reader concludes.
This is one of the more paramount points with all renewables. Our grid currently isn't structured to handle disparate power sources and carry them over long distances (as would be necessary to get wind energy to less windy areas), but instead is built to funnel energy from one large centralized unit, such as a coal-burning plant.
See more stories tagged with: biofuels, wind power, renewable energy, alternative energy, solar power
Tara Lohan is a managing editor at AlterNet.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »