Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Rich Nations Put Global Warming Burden on Africa

By Elizabeth Bast and Roxanne Lawson, TomPaine.com. Posted December 6, 2006.


The African continent is already straining from the effects of global climate change, while some of the world's biggest polluters -- the U.S., Australia, and Canada -- are doing nothing to help clean up their own mess.
Advertisement

The effects of the Great Warming are not fairly shared. Fourteen percent of the world's population lives in the 57 countries on the African continent. However, because the majority of Africans live with little to no access to electricity and personal transport usage is among the world's lowest, Africans contribute only 3 percent of the global greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming.

The United States, conversely, with only 5 percent of the world's population, contributes nearly 25 percent of worldwide greenhouse gas pollution annually. In the United States, with our consumption of electricity, our ecologically harmful industries and our 230 million passenger vehicles, we are literally fueling the destruction of the planet's environment.

Last month, at the United Nations Climate Change summit in Nairobi, Kenya, climate change experts from around the globe reported to 165 countries on the impacts of global warming, which will be felt most harshly by poor developing countries. If that weren't bad enough, the former World Bank chief economist Sir Nicholas Stern recently released a report that suggests that global warming could shrink the global economy by 20 percent over the next 50 years. From the report and the summit, it is clear that climate change is as much a humanitarian, security and economic issue as an environmental one.

Unfortunately, some of the world's richest countries and major polluters -- Australia, Canada and the U.S. -- failed, at the summit, to address the most urgent needs of the world's poorest countries. Climate change has already caused significant damage on the African continent and it is now agonizingly clear that a lack of action by the world's major polluters to reduce global warming pollution will, in short order, devastate the globe. "I do not see any change in our policy," said the United States' senior climate negotiator, Harlan Watson, days after the conference began. "We feel very comfortable."

According to the hundreds of scientists and other experts on the U.N.-backed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, global warming will create dramatically increased droughts, water shortages, coastal floods and disease for Africans.

The changes from the Great Warming are already being felt in many places. The people of northern Kenya, for instance, are still suffering today from a drought that started in 2003. Kenyan pastoralists have lost 10 million livestock, and two-thirds of the population in the Turkana region has lost their livelihoods.

In Nigeria, severe flooding in the Niger Delta has become more frequent, with floods wiping out crops and disrupting traditional farming practices. In Tanzania, one third of the ice field peak of Mount Kilimanjaro has disappeared in the last 12 years; 82 percent of Kilimanjaro's peak has vanished since it was first mapped in 1912.

Global warming has also caused changes in weather patterns that have and will continue to disrupt livelihoods across the continent. Declining crop yields in the next 20 years will lead to more famines and deaths. Droughts and increasing desertification mean smaller areas of viable farm land and an increase in forced migration to more densely populated areas. The results of global warming will inevitably heighten resource scarcity and fuel conflict and war.

Meanwhile, in some African countries, the oil, gas, mining and other extractive industries that support the consumption habits of the United States and other rich countries contribute to global warming. Nigeria, South Africa and Angola are all nations with comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions by African standards.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: global warming, africa, us, climate change, environmental policy, kyoto

Elizabeth Bast is an International Policy Analyst at Friends of the Earth-U.S. Roxanne Lawson is an International Policy Campaigner for Friends of the Earth.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
richest
Posted by: rsaxto on Dec 6, 2006 1:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The richest nations are causing the greatest global warming harm to all of us wherever we live. Yet they are too cheap to invest the money needed to create the infrastructure globally that can save us all. The richest folks have their heads sunk so far down in the sand that they can't see the looming disaster which will eventually bury their bloated asses which is where their brains seem to be located. Wake up Daddy Warbucks else you may kill us all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: richest Posted by: Knowmad
I tell people it's corporations (the rich) looting the rest of the world
Posted by: Ghoulman on Dec 6, 2006 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... and they called me a leftist. Or worse, a terrorist.

Anyone see a pattern here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Darfur
Posted by: theou on Dec 6, 2006 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article does not mention the environmental underpinnings of the Darfur Crisis.
The current analysis propagated by the MSM emphasizes the conflict between "African victims" and "Arab genocides" and goes no deeper into causes.
A great deal is made of the Islamic nature of the Sudanese Government who back the Janjaweed (Arabs) and the implication is that the natural perversity of Islam in general and Arabs in particular is at the heart of the conflict.
In fact the conflict is between agriculturists and pastoralists put under extreme pressure by the fallout of the Industrial Worlds wholesale generation of greenhouse gases.
Both populations involved are African and Islamic, so religious or ethnic elements are cannot be the crucial factor as is implied by the Western Media.
"It's the desiccation, Stupid"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Greenhouse Gases cause rape? Posted by: timebomb734
The African crisis is also an opportunity for change
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Dec 6, 2006 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Global warming is a long-term threat to Africa, along with the AIDS crisis, but it also presents a new possiblity. Africa is situated on the equator and is ideally situtated for solar energy production. Thus, Africa may be able to leapfrog the whole sorry history of fossil-fuel based industry and move directly to a renewable energy based industry.

The issue of water in Africa under global warming is probably going to be the most difficult issue. The glaciers of Kilimanjaro are going to be gone within some 50 years; this hasn't happened in 11,000 years. It seems that global warming will result in wetter coastal regions (sea level rise serious storms will impact these regions), while continental interiors will be subject to more severe droughts. The primary culprits in this are the entrenched vested interests of the oil&coal industy and nations like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the US, China and Australia.

In order to do this, African states must unite and reject the unfair-trade agreements and intellectual property restrictions imposed by Western nations, who are simply mining the continent for its resources. The conflict in Sudan is primarily over oil; the Chad-Cameroon pipeline financed by the World Bank for the benefit of Exxon is a good example of this; another good example is Chevron in Nigeria and the devastation of Ogoniland. In both cases, armed conflict is encouraged by oil corporations who wish to secure access to lucrative raw material reserves. The people caught in the middle are the ones who suffer genocide, rape, torture, etc.

It's clear that Western "development aid" to Africa is just a massive loansharking program facilitated by corrupt African leaders supported by Western interests, often through covert or third-party arms deals. The best bet for Africa would be to throw off it's colonial past, eject Western corporations, and form a "United States of Africa", much as the American colonies did when they got tired of being the slave of the British Empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

this is why we need world courts
Posted by: DaBear on Dec 6, 2006 11:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
African nations ought to be able to sue the bejesus out of the richest and most pollutinest nations. Once the US is brought to its knees financially by the creatures of its own criminal conduct (IMF/WB/WTO) you'll see the Bushies singing the solar/wind power praises.

Barring the legal methods, Africa could always declare war on the US, Canada and Australia or start blowing up their assets in their backyards. As Jefferson said (and didn't really believe in), A little revolution is a good thing now and again. The rich white boys need a little asskickin' to remember their place, yeah?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Extremism on both sides
Posted by: ng1944 on Dec 6, 2006 2:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We just got rid of extremists on the right
as extremists on the left are taking their place.
This way You will get another Bush in 2008
and congress full of GOPS

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» MOD PARENT UP! Posted by: nickptar
Do SOMETHING
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Dec 6, 2006 6:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or Gaia will come and get you by flood, warming, wildfire, tornado, hurricane, earthquake, volcanic activity, drought, pestilence, and so on. Gaia has many methods to control populations of her creatures. Do not think humans are any less immune for her persecution if they mistreat Gaia!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Do SOMETHING Posted by: nickptar
A Polluted Myth
Posted by: flashfast on Dec 6, 2006 6:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd suggest reading this article. A Polluted Myth

I'm a proponent that, while global warming is a threat, it's not the big black rabid bear wer'e all led to believe, that it takes our attention away from an even greater threat, which is multiplied toxicity. And sorry, I don't believe Australia is one of the world's worst polluters, simply because the best method for nullifying the effect of carbon dioxide and monoxide emissions are trees, and Australia has had the largest tree planting and restoration in the world (dating from the late seventies and spearheaded by school kids), as well as severe laws for their felling (if visitors come to Sydney and marvel at the fact they could be in the midst of a forest it's because city councils made tree felling illegal in the seventies - I wish LA would take notice, I've seen so many old copses felled for greedy developments).

Of course the government here now is ultra right wing and in love with the corporate interest by denying global warming, and our media is one of the most controlled and ignorant on the planet. But hopefully we'll vote them out next year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Polluted Myth Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: A Polluted Myth Posted by: flashfast