ENVIRONMENT  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 55

Let's Get the Grease out of School Lunches

Imagine a world where students could plant, harvest and cultivate the foods they eat in their school cafeterias.
August 28, 2006  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 
Lunchtime at Goleta Valley Junior High starts at 12:07. Within 28 minutes, 700 students have to be "fed" before returning to classes. The scene is pandemonium. Students are either standing in lines, clustered in small bands, or racing around as if lost. The lunch tables are folded and stacked with their accompanying chairs; students eat outside while standing up (a food fight a couple years ago resulted in the administration's removing any opportunity for students to sit down and eat together).

The cool stainless tubular slides that once carried plastic trays of hot food dished out by hair-netted women in starched white uniforms remain. But no milk machines squirt columns of regular or chocolate milk; no bottom-heated tables keep mashed potatoes or lasagna warm; no fishcakes wait in stacks; no coleslaw sits at the ready; no clam chowder simmers, ready to be ladled into waiting bowls.

The heating table's large pans are now filled with prepackaged barbecued beef sandwiches and cheeseburgers prepared at anonymous kitchens, miles away, with ingredients from U.S. government commodities programs. On the wall a faded sign reads, "Fruits and vegetables are always in season. Whether they're fresh, frozen, canned, or dried, they all count." The cardboard "No pizza today" sign brings audible sighs of disappointment.

A salad bar graces one corner of the room, laden with shredded iceberg lettuce, grated cheese, pickles, peppers, yogurt, granola, peanuts, and apple and orange pieces. Another station is stacked with Italian subs, ham sandwiches, and celery pieces with containers of peanut butter. With a pair of plastic tongs, the lady in charge of the salad bar makes a futile attempt to conceal the brown lettuce leaves. She asks if I'm an inspector, then apologizes for the condition of the lettuce. She tells me that it's the last day before the break and that they're trying to "get rid of" the old product.

The longest lines of students lead to two wire mesh-covered windows outside the building, where attendants dispense nachos -- orange gooey imitation cheese squirted from a machine onto chips. Every purchased item is placed in a thick cardboard tray. I watch as students pay for their food, then immediately toss the trays, foil wrappers, napkins, and cans into rapidly filling trash barrels.

Just a few blocks away, in the fertile fields of Fairview Gardens, a small community farm, long rows of asparagus poke their heads out of sandy soil, crimson strawberries dot a nearby field, and multicolored lettuces stand up straight and tall. Peach, plum, apricot, and nectarine trees have just shed their pink and white flower petals, revealing branches loaded with small fruit. In neighboring fields, the last of the mandarin oranges hang like orange beacons, and the first avocados cluster from huge grandfather trees in the "cathedral" orchard that dominates the land.

The farm is often referred to as "the little farm that could" for its unprecedented diversity of products and as a model of urban agriculture and public education. It has operated since 1895, holding out against the tide of development, withstanding a range of threats to its existence, and now permanently preserved under an agricultural conservation easement.

In the large field along Fairview Avenue, the main thoroughfare used by most students going to and from the school, carrots, beets, spinach, onions, broccoli, artichokes, and snap and English peas provide food for the burgeoning suburban population that now inhabits this once agricultural valley. In the surrounding neighborhood, fields containing some of the richest and deepest topsoil on the West Coast now yield housing developments, shopping centers, and clogged roadways.

It takes about 10 minutes to walk from Goleta Valley Junior High to Fairview Gardens farm, about four minutes by bicycle, and about one minute by car. This stunning twelve-and-a-half-acre outdoor classroom is open to the public. Thousands of people come each year to enjoy a different kind of educational experience, starting with soil and moving through a range of food crops and animals. Hundreds of students from the school have toured the farm. The farm helped the school to start a garden and has done assembly presentations about food and farming. But while those experiences are well received, the ideas and inspiration they engender stop at the cafeteria door. As founder and executive director of the Center for Urban Agriculture at Fairview Gardens, I've tried to interest the school in replacing some of the highly processed, distantly grown items that its cafeteria serves. I've offered the alternative of fresh, organic food grown by the school's neighbor down the street, but have never been able to generate interest.

Recently, the school district spent $150,000 on a computer system to manage the inflow of anonymous food from distant sources. But it doesn't require a computer to figure out that young people need whole food -- food that tastes better because it's grown in living soil and harvested locally, food that makes clear the relationship between human health and the health of the Earth. It doesn't require a computer to tell us that by feeding young people the best, not just the cheapest, we are in effect feeding and nourishing our own future.

Why shouldn't students be eating the sweet French carrots, the Clementine mandarins, the year-round salad greens, the radishes and beets and avocados that grow so near the school? How difficult would it be to replace nachos with real corn on the cob? How much more time and expense would be required to serve farm-fresh eggs, or ripe strawberries, or bean or vegetable soups and stew produced with real local ingredients? How difficult would it be to spend less on hardware and more on providing professional development so that cafeteria staff can help students make connections between the food they eat and the farms where it's grown?

Imagine if students could plant, harvest, and cultivate the very foods that later appear in their lunch at the cafeteria. Shouldn't all 700 students at Goleta Valley Junior High be required, as part of their education, to develop a relationship with the farm in order to understand the connections between soil life and their own life -- between taste and health?

For more than 20 years I have hosted local students on the farm, walking and grazing from the fields with them, allowing them to settle into a different rhythm for an hour or two. I always take a few moments to get to know them, to ask a few simple questions before we begin; How many of you live on farms, how many have ever visited one, what did you eat for breakfast? Over the years I have seen a dramatic shift in young people's responses and in their relationship to food and the land.

It used to be that a handful in every group lived on farms; most had at least visited one. Their breakfast might have included an egg or a piece of fruit or bread, or even some whole grain. Now it is rare to find a kid who lives on a farm, or has even visited one. Many have not had breakfast, and those who have often tell me that it consisted of a granola bar, a corn dog, or even a can of Coke. It is not just kids' answers that tell me that something has changed. When young people come to the farm, I look at each of them, study them the way I do the farm's soil and plants and trees, try to get a feel for how they are doing. These days, many are overweight; they seem to lack focus and have difficulty being still. Our task with our young visitors is different now, our goals very basic. We want to provide them with something real to eat -- a fresh carrot or strawberry -- and an hour or two outside of the walls of the classroom, a chance to slow down and an opportunity to touch the Earth for just one moment and to be calmed and settled by it. Change, I have to remind myself, comes slowly and incrementally.

This essay by Michael Ableman is taken from Thinking outside the Lunchbox, an essay series of the Center for Ecoliteracy, ecoliteracy.org © Copyright 2005 Center for Ecoliteracy. All rights reserved. Printed with permission.

Michael Ableman is a farmer, educator, and founder and executive director of the Center for Urban Agriculture at Fairview Gardens in Goleta, California.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email


Comments are closed-

School lunches are a disgrace...
Posted by: eyespy on Aug 28, 2006 1:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are now raising the first generation of Americans who will live shorter lives than their parents. Significant responsibility for this lies with the lunches provided in most school cafeterias nationwide. High amounts of sugar are causing Type II diabetes in children as young as ten. Increasing fat content is causing epidemic obesity in all school-age groups. A lack of exercise, both from diminishing Phys ed and recess time and the replacement of playing real games with video games, is adding to the problem.

Cooking good tasting food with good food is not that difficult. Simple training can be provided to large numbers of people to familiarize them with how to cook with fresh ingredients. Specialized training could then be provided at the schools to complete this process.

This would probably be expensive. But when you take the conventional wisdom that one dollar spent on prevention is worth ten in treatment, it starts to look like a bargain. Kids today are unhealthy, shockingly so. They will become dependent on pharmaceutical medicine and die earlier if there is not a fundamental change in the way American schools provide nutrition for their students.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh, prove it. Posted by: susannunes
» RE: Oh, prove it. Posted by: clairethereader

Comments are closed-

crap
Posted by: rsaxto on Aug 28, 2006 1:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No wonder so many American youngsters are unhealthy, overweight and listless: they eat crap with no way to experience healthy food in a healthy environment unless they get it at home, an unlikely experience these days. If food habits are gained in these bad formative ways and our nation's greatest government thrust is to commit mass murder overseas, can the future ever get better? Decent people would like to know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Sentimental, but...
Posted by: ahmlco on Aug 28, 2006 1:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Imagine if students could plant, harvest, and cultivate the very foods that later appear in their lunch at the cafeteria."

I'd rather they spent their time learning to actually read and write, with math, hard science, and history thrown in to boot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sentimental, but... Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: Sentimental, but... Posted by: nickptar
» RE: Sentimental, but... Posted by: mazel
» Crazy ole me Posted by: magmaybe
» RE: Crazy ole me Posted by: fungus
» Either Or?? Posted by: REDROCKCOWGIRL
» RE: Sentimental, but... Posted by: fungus
» RE: Sentimental, but... Posted by: nickptar

Comments are closed-

Class warfare at its MOST INSIDIOUS
Posted by: owlbear1 on Aug 28, 2006 4:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Feed the children shit while their brains are developing and make them oxen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

We don't have school cafeterias around here.
Posted by: Annarisse on Aug 28, 2006 4:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Articles like this one make me glad my daughter will be going to my mother-in-law's for lunch, and later on, I'll be packing her lunch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Students cafeterias
Posted by: APotempska on Aug 28, 2006 5:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last year I visited a school in Aachen (Germany). The students there grow their own fruit and vegetables, tend to the animals (goats, chicken are on premises), then they cook the food from their farm and serve it for lunch at the school. All those activities are part of the curriculum in Earth Science, History and Culture, Practical Skills, you name it. Children from 1st to 12th grade are involved.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Students cafeterias Posted by: symcokid

Comments are closed-

Nice idea, but
Posted by: mothersmovement on Aug 28, 2006 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not every school in the U.S. is located in an area where oranges and avocados grow. In fact, in New England the only time edible produce can be harvested corresponds roughly to the summer vacation break. We're able to get fresh, local lettuce about six weeks out of the entire year. We have strawberries for one or two weeks, max. Ditto for most other produce, and as previously mentioned, there are a whole slew of tasty and nutritious foods that simply don't grow here, and the ones that do are marketed at a premium.

Not to mention, most school districts have cut back their physical education and recess periods to the bare minimum to make time for required academics and standardized testing. Even in areas where food could be planted and grown as part of the regular school curriculum, I just can't see that happening unless the school day is extended.

I'm all in favor of including more quality, fresh food in school lunches. But Mr. Ableman's plan isn't feasible as a national model.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nice idea, but Posted by: kelt65

Comments are closed-

commendable, but...
Posted by: Jesse on Aug 28, 2006 6:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Part of the problem is that it takes a lot of work to farm food -- there is a reason that people who subsistence farm spend all day at it.

While I like the idea of having gardens supply the schools, such things strike me as of limitied practicability for many schools, especially urban ones.

Then there is the issue of supplying schools in winter, for kids that don't live in places with a year-round growing season.

Many schools manage to do this kind of stuff as a botique project, but it doesn't strike me as a good way to get a lunch to a school with 1,000 students in, say, Brooklyn. this isn't becuase I think kids should eat processed food--lord knows, I blame those TV-dinner things we got in the 70s for puttingme off beans for years. (Anyone else here remember those overcooked string beans with the single-meatball spaghetti?)

But I see a whole stack of basic, practical difficuties here.

That said, a 4-H like program for some part of the year is no bad thing. Especially since most people simply don't live on farms anymore (and there really is no reason they should).

Also, let's not romanticize the rural living thing. My great aunt grew up many years back in upstate New York, and as she tells it, it isn't the kind of life I'd be interested in. Having to spend several hours a day to churn your own butter doesn't thrill me, nor does hoeing with a cultivator for another 12 hours. But that is what happens on an organic farm (at that time they didn't have petroleum-based fertilizers).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

It starts WAY before entering school
Posted by: Snott on Aug 28, 2006 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've had the opportunity to observe many families' eating habits, particularly their children's, as my grandchildren play with them. I am usually shocked to see children open up their lunches from home to have, generally, some thin sandwich on white bread and, invariably, a bag of chips of sugary snacks to complete their lunches. Often they have "fruit drink" for a beverage (when I asked them why they'd send that in their kids thermoses, the answer was that the kids don't like the smell of milk in thermoses!)

In the areas of education and health, primary responsibilities carried by the parents and supported by the schools, history shows that those with involved, concerned parents do the best - far beyond those whose parents plunk a buck and half in their kids hands daily and expect them to eat whatever they can get that they like.

One local elementary school here actually has a greenhouse and all grades get to participate in growing and sometimes preparing food for lunches. I disagree that they should be spending all their time on Readin' Writin' and 'Rithmatic - lessons in some of the essential factors of life are vital.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Juice vs milk Posted by: REDROCKCOWGIRL
» RE: Juice vs milk Posted by: clairethereader

Comments are closed-

Grade D meat
Posted by: dancingcloud on Aug 28, 2006 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Grade D meat is "suitable only for pet food and school lunches." Need I say more?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

US funding of school lunch programs in the developing world
Posted by: plantland on Aug 28, 2006 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is dreadful that some children are leaving countries where they would have had whole foods- corn and beans- if only they could afford enough to eat, to come to a land where more and more Franinfood is being processed and given to children in school breakfast and lunch programs.

It is important that if the US goes forward in the near future with Senator McGovern's plan to enable all developing countries to serve a school meal, both to help children nutritionally and as an inducement to stay in school, that wholesome foods are selected for those programs, and not have them bidded out to processors who will introduce them to more additives and sugar.

I think that it is very problematic that people come to the US for a better life only to buy and be served food which induces obesity and causes attention deficit disorder.

Foreign aid should go to support organic farming and employment by guaranteeing the purchase of locally produced wholesome fruits and vegetables for their own school lunch programs and for import to the US, hopefully for our school lunch programs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Jamie's School Dinners
Posted by: ericn613 on Aug 28, 2006 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article reminds me of a most excellent BBC Channel 4 program that aired here in the States earlier this year, though I can't remember on which channel (maybe Discovery?), entitled Jamie's School Dinners. In it, famous television chef Jamie Oliver essentially tries to do in a few schools in London what the author here wishes to do in our cafeterias in the U.S. It was challenging, grueling, and difficult, but ultimately worth it, and the students were so much better for it.

I understand that avocadoes and oranges don't grow everywhere, but it would be really wonderful if school lunch programs instituted what we should all be doing to save not only our health but the environment: eat locally, organically, and seasonally. With the appropriate planning, this is attainable and affordable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Do try this at home.
Posted by: Kneel on Aug 28, 2006 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They could just plant their lawns. So many suburban schools have these enormous lawns. If people could just get over that fixation, you could grow a lot of food there. It could make for a nice class - learn about what's involved in producing food, and an it'd be an interesting summer project for some students as well.

Then they could do it at home.

I mean, I imagine after seeing and tasting such food bursting right out of the ground where there was just this useless grass that had to be mowed all the time, a lot of students and others would go nuts to try this at home.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Eating habits start at home . . .
Posted by: FauxPorteno on Aug 28, 2006 9:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Why shouldn't students be eating the sweet French carrots, the Clementine mandarins, the year-round salad greens, the radishes and beets and avocados that grow so near the school? How difficult would it be to replace nachos with real corn on the cob? How much more time and expense would be required to serve farm-fresh eggs, or ripe strawberries, or bean or vegetable soups and stew produced with real local ingredients?"

That sounds wonderful except for one minor detail: kids don't eat that good stuff in their own homes yet we expect them to eat a balanced diet at school when no one is watching? I doubt many kids would eat right even if given the choice. Here is a simple truth for parents. A Big Mac or Snickers bar tastes better than whole wheat bread and brussel sprouts so it should come as no surprise that kids opt for the more satisfying yet nutritionally deficient food. The kind of crap I see parents buying for their kids in supermarkets today is appalling. Sugary cereals and sodas, processed meats with nitrites, empty carb/high fat foods like chips - the list goes on.

Kids will take the habits you initiate early on with them for a lifetime. I'm not exactly sure how parents can persuade their kids to eat healthier but I know that serving vegetables at dinner and making fruit available for snacks at least gives them the option to start forming better eating habits when it counts. You could always do what my parents did - force them to eat their veggies. Fortunately for them I was a strange kid and loved broccoli, cauliflower, brussel sprouts, green beans, peaches, apples, etc. so mom and dad didn't really have their work cut out for them. Those habits have stuck with me to this day and at 33 I have 10% body fat and have climbed 6900+ meter peaks. I attribute much of that to my diet. It also didn't hurt that my parents ran a small organic truck farm where fresh veggies were only a hop, skip and a jump away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Deferring blame
Posted by: Elmowilcox on Aug 28, 2006 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would just like to point out that I grew up eating crappy cafeteria food as did most of the kids I know, and I'm quite thin. In my days there were only a few fatties around, I credit this to being ACTIVE, ya know, running around at recess and for hours after classes were over. I think the blame lies less on the substandard food than it does on video games and overly cautious parenting(read, parents so worried about their children being abducted they don't let the outside). I drive in my old neighborhood where back in the day(i'm talking 1990) you would have had to watch diligently for "children at play", except now the street is void of any activity at all, yet about 10-15 kids get off at each bus stop on either end of the street. Where are they? In front of the television. The soccer fields that were filled with teams practicing are now in disrepair and unoccupied most of the time. Noone plays....
So you say food, I say institutionalized mass laziness. Sure the food isn't the most healthy, but it's not why kids are fat, our bodies are set up to get rid of fat, it's used up as energy before ever gets the chance to be fat actually. Problem is that you don't burn much energy by working over a PS2 controller for 4 hours. Go throw a ball or something and eat your damn food, and like it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Deferring blame Posted by: magmaybe
» Well in... Posted by: Elmowilcox
» Spot on Posted by: kepstein7777

Comments are closed-

biochemurgic
Posted by: biochemurgic on Aug 28, 2006 1:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those of you commenting that the idea of fresh produce for school lunches is unrealistic in much of the country, let me suggest a visit to the Four Season Farm website (http://www.fourseasonfarm.com) run by Eliot Coleman and Barbara Damrosch. These folks are in Maine, but listen to what they have been able to do:

"The traditional fresh produce season for market gardeners in the colder parts of North America begins in June and ends in September. For the past eight years, in defiance of our long, cold Maine winters, we have been developing an environmentally sound, resource efficient, and economically viable system for extending fresh vegetable production into "the other eight months." We call it the "winter harvest." Our success thus far is very encouraging. We currently sell freshly harvested salads and main course vegetables from the 1st of October until the 31st of May."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Article Appreciated
Posted by: Gravitas on Aug 28, 2006 1:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really, really appreciate this article. As someone who is very concerned with the effects of antifat hysteria on the self-esteem of children, I really appreciate HOW you made your point. It was refreshing to read the real reasons we should be eating healthy: a oneness with nature, holistic heath, and love for the planet. These things should come first, obsession over numbers set by the pharmaceuticals to sell products should not even factor into it. It is beyond pathetic how we are repeating the cycle of fear. Teaching kids to be terrified of gaining weight and stigmitizing them if they don't achieve some arbitrary body type. It is emotionally barbaric! We wouldn't deal with any other "problem" in that way. It is also been shown to be counterproductive. We have had this fear of fat for 50 yrs now, and it has only compounded the problem. How much better to convert through JOY than fear.

I am dissappointed but not surprised at some of the comments though. While the author tried to put healthy eating in universal perspective, the readers can't let go of media brainwashing. They can't erase the tape that mitigation of obesity should be the be all and end all of good nutrition. What happens it they invent a pill where we can stay thin no matter what. Should we then stop caring about nutrition or the planet? And actually, that this generation will not live longer than their parents is speculation, not fact. In fact, it is a scare tactic by big Pharma who are the bucks behind the International Obesity Association. Fifty years ago, there were almost the exact same dire predictions about how obesity would shorten life and it did not come to pass. And as for the reader who only noticed "a few fatties" (I wonder what other group would be so objectified on a "liberal" board), it is not just lack of exercise or food. Environmental endocrine disrupters, growth hormones in food, and even moms who diet severely before pregnancy can cause weight gain.

"Weight obsession is a social disease. If we cared more about CO2 than BMI there would still be time."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

School + farm
Posted by: Logic's Edge on Aug 28, 2006 2:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be a good thing all around for every school to have a at least a modest farm attached to it, wouldn't it? It's unfortunate such a thing wasn't put into law a hundred years ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Government subsidized
Posted by: darkgrrrl on Aug 28, 2006 3:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This reminded me of a Mother Jones piece I read, from 2003.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) buys product from the American meat and dairy industries, and gives them to public schools. Operating on ever-tightening budgets, most schools have no choice but to accept and use that food. Big Agribusiness gets subsidized, and schoolchildren get unhealthy lunches.

Read the entire article here:
Unhappy Meals

Integrating locally grown foods into schools lunches is a wonderful idea, though its feasibilty is debatable. Another method of improvement would be to provide public schools with money enough to enable them to provide better-quality meals and decline the government's free-but-unhealthy offerings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Government subsidized Posted by: Jarmadi

Comments are closed-

Collingwood College, Melbourne
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Aug 28, 2006 4:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]

Comments are closed-

okay, those lunches sound gross, but
Posted by: owleyes on Aug 28, 2006 7:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what you are proposing sounds equally terrible. You want kids to eat healthy lunches, but you want them to till the soil for it. So basically you're for turning 12-year-olds into serfs. That's revolutionary, but I think I have a better idea. Why not just go back to the old way where they sat down with their friends, ate their lasagna, then went outside and ran around? Even better, they could have healthy food from the local farm that was cultivated, harvested, and prepared by well-compensated adults. How revolutionary is that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And? Posted by: Aussie Kim

Comments are closed-

not true
Posted by: Gregor on Aug 28, 2006 9:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Working in schools these days has them much healthier lunches. There is a regular salad bar and vegetarian burgers. Once in while chicken nuggets or pizza, but I defy anyone to say they don't eat those at home! C'mon, let's get out of the dark ages. Schools struggle hard to keep up with the nutrition of schools. You can get change in the cafeteria if you want.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Factory schools are the future
Posted by: cynic on Aug 29, 2006 9:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I see a day when schools will be in large warehouse type buildings with dim lighting. Each student will sit in a 3x4 foot room and learning his/her lessons through video games developed by an educational game development company in Texas with excellent lobbyists. Each student will have a game controller and a flat panel display. The computer knows who each student is by the RFID tag inserted under the skin behind their neck. Snacks and lunch consist of a mixture of salt and fat which is pumped to each student through tubes that run along the ceiling. All of the equipment is waterproof so that the school can be hosed down at the end of each day by low wage non union immigrants under contract to the low bidding janitor service. The productivity of these schools is incredible. One teacher can instruct 500 students and all other staff has been eliminated. All students are tracked by the computers and all instruction is individualized to the abilities of the student. All of this produtivity was developed as a result of tax cuts that were necessary to prevent businesses from leaving the State.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Imagine a World...
Posted by: susannunes on Aug 29, 2006 6:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
where the health food crackpots and vegetarian crazies would quit trying to force their garbage beliefs down everybody else's throat.

Guess what? A BALANCED diet, NOT a pseudovegetarian, boring, not-particularly-healthy diet, is the answer.

I HATE and DESPISE health food nuts who fall sucker for every single quack idea under the sun.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Imagine a World... Posted by: clairethereader
» RE: Imagine a World... Posted by: Logic's Edge

Comments are closed-

To all proposing child-run farms....
Posted by: Elmowilcox on Aug 29, 2006 7:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sure, it would be good for a lot of kids to learn about the Earth and how to grow their own food, a quite commendable proposal actually. Just too bad about that whole rampant illiteracy thing we have going on in this country. With that said, do you really think it's a great idea to take away kid's classtime learning to read and do mathematics to learn how to grow their own strawberries? I don't think so.
I can even say that at some point in the future being able to cultivate the land will be more important than being able to read....again(as was in the past, and present in certain areas) as someone above already pointed out, but I just don't believe that this is a very important subject for a bunch of kids to learn. Especially considering that most live in the suburbs and cities where there isn't a half acre of viable farmland for miles any damn way. At best, it should be offerred as an elective at the middle school level in preparation for the 4H club in high school. Elementary school students belong in Elementary schools learning elementary skills for the rest of their lives, which will statiscally NOT involve ever tilling soil or picking veggies.
So that whole proposal to me isn't exactly a bad idea, just definitely not a good one that's going to solve much of anything for what's lost in the process.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I'm an example
Posted by: clairethereader on Aug 30, 2006 3:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I grew up eating school lunches just about every school day. Chicken nuggets, sausage pizza, and cheeseburgers were a few examples of things I was fed at school, and the most available vegetable was the potato. It's no wonder I was significantly overweight for the vast majority of my childhood.

I'm now a vegan with a very varied, healthy, balanced diet. I have a BMI of 21.2, perfectly clear skin, tons of energy, and I feel healthier than I've ever felt. I find it almost funny - during the day (I'm still in high school) I see most of my peers eating school lunch, overweight, with bad skin, looking tired...the connection is painfully obvious to me and apparently invisible to everyone else.

While it would be nice, I'm not saying every single student in my school and others around the country needs to go vegan or even vegetarian. I only wish the school lunch program and those who create it would shift to a more plant-based view of health, rather than one revolving around white bread, meat, scant fruit and vegetable selections, and milk. Doctors and dieticians point out that America is the fattest country in the world...can anything else be expected when we're teaching our children from the very beginning that these foods are the healthiest? Others have commented that good eating habits begin in the home, and, while this is true, the practice of good eating is difficult to make a lifelong habit when a person is being told for most of the first eighteen years of their life that a diet high in animal products and refined grains/sugars and low in fruits and vegetables is healthy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

School lunches are a disgrace...
Posted by: eyespy on Aug 28, 2006 1:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are now raising the first generation of Americans who will live shorter lives than their parents. Significant responsibility for this lies with the lunches provided in most school cafeterias nationwide. High amounts of sugar are causing Type II diabetes in children as young as ten. Increasing fat content is causing epidemic obesity in all school-age groups. A lack of exercise, both from diminishing Phys ed and recess time and the replacement of playing real games with video games, is adding to the problem.

Cooking good tasting food with good food is not that difficult. Simple training can be provided to large numbers of people to familiarize them with how to cook with fresh ingredients. Specialized training could then be provided at the schools to complete this process.

This would probably be expensive. But when you take the conventional wisdom that one dollar spent on prevention is worth ten in treatment, it starts to look like a bargain. Kids today are unhealthy, shockingly so. They will become dependent on pharmaceutical medicine and die earlier if there is not a fundamental change in the way American schools provide nutrition for their students.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh, prove it. Posted by: susannunes
» RE: Oh, prove it. Posted by: clairethereader

Comments are closed-

crap
Posted by: rsaxto on Aug 28, 2006 1:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No wonder so many American youngsters are unhealthy, overweight and listless: they eat crap with no way to experience healthy food in a healthy environment unless they get it at home, an unlikely experience these days. If food habits are gained in these bad formative ways and our nation's greatest government thrust is to commit mass murder overseas, can the future ever get better? Decent people would like to know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Sentimental, but...
Posted by: ahmlco on Aug 28, 2006 1:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Imagine if students could plant, harvest, and cultivate the very foods that later appear in their lunch at the cafeteria."

I'd rather they spent their time learning to actually read and write, with math, hard science, and history thrown in to boot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sentimental, but... Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: Sentimental, but... Posted by: nickptar
» RE: Sentimental, but... Posted by: mazel
» Crazy ole me Posted by: magmaybe
» RE: Crazy ole me Posted by: fungus
» Either Or?? Posted by: REDROCKCOWGIRL
» RE: Sentimental, but... Posted by: fungus
» RE: Sentimental, but... Posted by: nickptar

Comments are closed-

Class warfare at its MOST INSIDIOUS
Posted by: owlbear1 on Aug 28, 2006 4:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Feed the children shit while their brains are developing and make them oxen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

We don't have school cafeterias around here.
Posted by: Annarisse on Aug 28, 2006 4:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Articles like this one make me glad my daughter will be going to my mother-in-law's for lunch, and later on, I'll be packing her lunch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Students cafeterias
Posted by: APotempska on Aug 28, 2006 5:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last year I visited a school in Aachen (Germany). The students there grow their own fruit and vegetables, tend to the animals (goats, chicken are on premises), then they cook the food from their farm and serve it for lunch at the school. All those activities are part of the curriculum in Earth Science, History and Culture, Practical Skills, you name it. Children from 1st to 12th grade are involved.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Students cafeterias Posted by: symcokid

Comments are closed-

Nice idea, but
Posted by: mothersmovement on Aug 28, 2006 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not every school in the U.S. is located in an area where oranges and avocados grow. In fact, in New England the only time edible produce can be harvested corresponds roughly to the summer vacation break. We're able to get fresh, local lettuce about six weeks out of the entire year. We have strawberries for one or two weeks, max. Ditto for most other produce, and as previously mentioned, there are a whole slew of tasty and nutritious foods that simply don't grow here, and the ones that do are marketed at a premium.

Not to mention, most school districts have cut back their physical education and recess periods to the bare minimum to make time for required academics and standardized testing. Even in areas where food could be planted and grown as part of the regular school curriculum, I just can't see that happening unless the school day is extended.

I'm all in favor of including more quality, fresh food in school lunches. But Mr. Ableman's plan isn't feasible as a national model.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nice idea, but Posted by: kelt65

Comments are closed-

commendable, but...
Posted by: Jesse on Aug 28, 2006 6:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Part of the problem is that it takes a lot of work to farm food -- there is a reason that people who subsistence farm spend all day at it.

While I like the idea of having gardens supply the schools, such things strike me as of limitied practicability for many schools, especially urban ones.

Then there is the issue of supplying schools in winter, for kids that don't live in places with a year-round growing season.

Many schools manage to do this kind of stuff as a botique project, but it doesn't strike me as a good way to get a lunch to a school with 1,000 students in, say, Brooklyn. this isn't becuase I think kids should eat processed food--lord knows, I blame those TV-dinner things we got in the 70s for puttingme off beans for years. (Anyone else here remember those overcooked string beans with the single-meatball spaghetti?)

But I see a whole stack of basic, practical difficuties here.

That said, a 4-H like program for some part of the year is no bad thing. Especially since most people simply don't live on farms anymore (and there really is no reason they should).

Also, let's not romanticize the rural living thing. My great aunt grew up many years back in upstate New York, and as she tells it, it isn't the kind of life I'd be interested in. Having to spend several hours a day to churn your own butter doesn't thrill me, nor does hoeing with a cultivator for another 12 hours. But that is what happens on an organic farm (at that time they didn't have petroleum-based fertilizers).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

It starts WAY before entering school
Posted by: Snott on Aug 28, 2006 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've had the opportunity to observe many families' eating habits, particularly their children's, as my grandchildren play with them. I am usually shocked to see children open up their lunches from home to have, generally, some thin sandwich on white bread and, invariably, a bag of chips of sugary snacks to complete their lunches. Often they have "fruit drink" for a beverage (when I asked them why they'd send that in their kids thermoses, the answer was that the kids don't like the smell of milk in thermoses!)

In the areas of education and health, primary responsibilities carried by the parents and supported by the schools, history shows that those with involved, concerned parents do the best - far beyond those whose parents plunk a buck and half in their kids hands daily and expect them to eat whatever they can get that they like.

One local elementary school here actually has a greenhouse and all grades get to participate in growing and sometimes preparing food for lunches. I disagree that they should be spending all their time on Readin' Writin' and 'Rithmatic - lessons in some of the essential factors of life are vital.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Juice vs milk Posted by: REDROCKCOWGIRL
» RE: Juice vs milk Posted by: clairethereader

Comments are closed-

Grade D meat
Posted by: dancingcloud on Aug 28, 2006 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Grade D meat is "suitable only for pet food and school lunches." Need I say more?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

US funding of school lunch programs in the developing world
Posted by: plantland on Aug 28, 2006 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is dreadful that some children are leaving countries where they would have had whole foods- corn and beans- if only they could afford enough to eat, to come to a land where more and more Franinfood is being processed and given to children in school breakfast and lunch programs.

It is important that if the US goes forward in the near future with Senator McGovern's plan to enable all developing countries to serve a school meal, both to help children nutritionally and as an inducement to stay in school, that wholesome foods are selected for those programs, and not have them bidded out to processors who will introduce them to more additives and sugar.

I think that it is very problematic that people come to the US for a better life only to buy and be served food which induces obesity and causes attention deficit disorder.

Foreign aid should go to support organic farming and employment by guaranteeing the purchase of locally produced wholesome fruits and vegetables for their own school lunch programs and for import to the US, hopefully for our school lunch programs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Jamie's School Dinners
Posted by: ericn613 on Aug 28, 2006 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article reminds me of a most excellent BBC Channel 4 program that aired here in the States earlier this year, though I can't remember on which channel (maybe Discovery?), entitled Jamie's School Dinners. In it, famous television chef Jamie Oliver essentially tries to do in a few schools in London what the author here wishes to do in our cafeterias in the U.S. It was challenging, grueling, and difficult, but ultimately worth it, and the students were so much better for it.

I understand that avocadoes and oranges don't grow everywhere, but it would be really wonderful if school lunch programs instituted what we should all be doing to save not only our health but the environment: eat locally, organically, and seasonally. With the appropriate planning, this is attainable and affordable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Do try this at home.
Posted by: Kneel on Aug 28, 2006 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They could just plant their lawns. So many suburban schools have these enormous lawns. If people could just get over that fixation, you could grow a lot of food there. It could make for a nice class - learn about what's involved in producing food, and an it'd be an interesting summer project for some students as well.

Then they could do it at home.

I mean, I imagine after seeing and tasting such food bursting right out of the ground where there was just this useless grass that had to be mowed all the time, a lot of students and others would go nuts to try this at home.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Eating habits start at home . . .
Posted by: FauxPorteno on Aug 28, 2006 9:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Why shouldn't students be eating the sweet French carrots, the Clementine mandarins, the year-round salad greens, the radishes and beets and avocados that grow so near the school? How difficult would it be to replace nachos with real corn on the cob? How much more time and expense would be required to serve farm-fresh eggs, or ripe strawberries, or bean or vegetable soups and stew produced with real local ingredients?"

That sounds wonderful except for one minor detail: kids don't eat that good stuff in their own homes yet we expect them to eat a balanced diet at school when no one is watching? I doubt many kids would eat right even if given the choice. Here is a simple truth for parents. A Big Mac or Snickers bar tastes better than whole wheat bread and brussel sprouts so it should come as no surprise that kids opt for the more satisfying yet nutritionally deficient food. The kind of crap I see parents buying for their kids in supermarkets today is appalling. Sugary cereals and sodas, processed meats with nitrites, empty carb/high fat foods like chips - the list goes on.

Kids will take the habits you initiate early on with them for a lifetime. I'm not exactly sure how parents can persuade their kids to eat healthier but I know that serving vegetables at dinner and making fruit available for snacks at least gives them the option to start forming better eating habits when it counts. You could always do what my parents did - force them to eat their veggies. Fortunately for them I was a strange kid and loved broccoli, cauliflower, brussel sprouts, green beans, peaches, apples, etc. so mom and dad didn't really have their work cut out for them. Those habits have stuck with me to this day and at 33 I have 10% body fat and have climbed 6900+ meter peaks. I attribute much of that to my diet. It also didn't hurt that my parents ran a small organic truck farm where fresh veggies were only a hop, skip and a jump away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Deferring blame
Posted by: Elmowilcox on Aug 28, 2006 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would just like to point out that I grew up eating crappy cafeteria food as did most of the kids I know, and I'm quite thin. In my days there were only a few fatties around, I credit this to being ACTIVE, ya know, running around at recess and for hours after classes were over. I think the blame lies less on the substandard food than it does on video games and overly cautious parenting(read, parents so worried about their children being abducted they don't let the outside). I drive in my old neighborhood where back in the day(i'm talking 1990) you would have had to watch diligently for "children at play", except now the street is void of any activity at all, yet about 10-15 kids get off at each bus stop on either end of the street. Where are they? In front of the television. The soccer fields that were filled with teams practicing are now in disrepair and unoccupied most of the time. Noone plays....
So you say food, I say institutionalized mass laziness. Sure the food isn't the most healthy, but it's not why kids are fat, our bodies are set up to get rid of fat, it's used up as energy before ever gets the chance to be fat actually. Problem is that you don't burn much energy by working over a PS2 controller for 4 hours. Go throw a ball or something and eat your damn food, and like it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Deferring blame Posted by: magmaybe
» Well in... Posted by: Elmowilcox
» Spot on Posted by: kepstein7777

Comments are closed-

biochemurgic
Posted by: biochemurgic on Aug 28, 2006 1:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those of you commenting that the idea of fresh produce for school lunches is unrealistic in much of the country, let me suggest a visit to the Four Season Farm website (http://www.fourseasonfarm.com) run by Eliot Coleman and Barbara Damrosch. These folks are in Maine, but listen to what they have been able to do:

"The traditional fresh produce season for market gardeners in the colder parts of North America begins in June and ends in September. For the past eight years, in defiance of our long, cold Maine winters, we have been developing an environmentally sound, resource efficient, and economically viable system for extending fresh vegetable production into "the other eight months." We call it the "winter harvest." Our success thus far is very encouraging. We currently sell freshly harvested salads and main course vegetables from the 1st of October until the 31st of May."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Article Appreciated
Posted by: Gravitas on Aug 28, 2006 1:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really, really appreciate this article. As someone who is very concerned with the effects of antifat hysteria on the self-esteem of children, I really appreciate HOW you made your point. It was refreshing to read the real reasons we should be eating healthy: a oneness with nature, holistic heath, and love for the planet. These things should come first, obsession over numbers set by the pharmaceuticals to sell products should not even factor into it. It is beyond pathetic how we are repeating the cycle of fear. Teaching kids to be terrified of gaining weight and stigmitizing them if they don't achieve some arbitrary body type. It is emotionally barbaric! We wouldn't deal with any other "problem" in that way. It is also been shown to be counterproductive. We have had this fear of fat for 50 yrs now, and it has only compounded the problem. How much better to convert through JOY than fear.

I am dissappointed but not surprised at some of the comments though. While the author tried to put healthy eating in universal perspective, the readers can't let go of media brainwashing. They can't erase the tape that mitigation of obesity should be the be all and end all of good nutrition. What happens it they invent a pill where we can stay thin no matter what. Should we then stop caring about nutrition or the planet? And actually, that this generation will not live longer than their parents is speculation, not fact. In fact, it is a scare tactic by big Pharma who are the bucks behind the International Obesity Association. Fifty years ago, there were almost the exact same dire predictions about how obesity would shorten life and it did not come to pass. And as for the reader who only noticed "a few fatties" (I wonder what other group would be so objectified on a "liberal" board), it is not just lack of exercise or food. Environmental endocrine disrupters, growth hormones in food, and even moms who diet severely before pregnancy can cause weight gain.

"Weight obsession is a social disease. If we cared more about CO2 than BMI there would still be time."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

School + farm
Posted by: Logic's Edge on Aug 28, 2006 2:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be a good thing all around for every school to have a at least a modest farm attached to it, wouldn't it? It's unfortunate such a thing wasn't put into law a hundred years ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Government subsidized
Posted by: darkgrrrl on Aug 28, 2006 3:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This reminded me of a Mother Jones piece I read, from 2003.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) buys product from the American meat and dairy industries, and gives them to public schools. Operating on ever-tightening budgets, most schools have no choice but to accept and use that food. Big Agribusiness gets subsidized, and schoolchildren get unhealthy lunches.

Read the entire article here:
Unhappy Meals

Integrating locally grown foods into schools lunches is a wonderful idea, though its feasibilty is debatable. Another method of improvement would be to provide public schools with money enough to enable them to provide better-quality meals and decline the government's free-but-unhealthy offerings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Government subsidized Posted by: Jarmadi

Comments are closed-

Collingwood College, Melbourne
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Aug 28, 2006 4:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]

Comments are closed-

okay, those lunches sound gross, but
Posted by: owleyes on Aug 28, 2006 7:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what you are proposing sounds equally terrible. You want kids to eat healthy lunches, but you want them to till the soil for it. So basically you're for turning 12-year-olds into serfs. That's revolutionary, but I think I have a better idea. Why not just go back to the old way where they sat down with their friends, ate their lasagna, then went outside and ran around? Even better, they could have healthy food from the local farm that was cultivated, harvested, and prepared by well-compensated adults. How revolutionary is that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And? Posted by: Aussie Kim

Comments are closed-

not true
Posted by: Gregor on Aug 28, 2006 9:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Working in schools these days has them much healthier lunches. There is a regular salad bar and vegetarian burgers. Once in while chicken nuggets or pizza, but I defy anyone to say they don't eat those at home! C'mon, let's get out of the dark ages. Schools struggle hard to keep up with the nutrition of schools. You can get change in the cafeteria if you want.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Factory schools are the future
Posted by: cynic on Aug 29, 2006 9:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I see a day when schools will be in large warehouse type buildings with dim lighting. Each student will sit in a 3x4 foot room and learning his/her lessons through video games developed by an educational game development company in Texas with excellent lobbyists. Each student will have a game controller and a flat panel display. The computer knows who each student is by the RFID tag inserted under the skin behind their neck. Snacks and lunch consist of a mixture of salt and fat which is pumped to each student through tubes that run along the ceiling. All of the equipment is waterproof so that the school can be hosed down at the end of each day by low wage non union immigrants under contract to the low bidding janitor service. The productivity of these schools is incredible. One teacher can instruct 500 students and all other staff has been eliminated. All students are tracked by the computers and all instruction is individualized to the abilities of the student. All of this produtivity was developed as a result of tax cuts that were necessary to prevent businesses from leaving the State.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Imagine a World...
Posted by: susannunes on Aug 29, 2006 6:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
where the health food crackpots and vegetarian crazies would quit trying to force their garbage beliefs down everybody else's throat.

Guess what? A BALANCED diet, NOT a pseudovegetarian, boring, not-particularly-healthy diet, is the answer.

I HATE and DESPISE health food nuts who fall sucker for every single quack idea under the sun.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Imagine a World... Posted by: clairethereader
» RE: Imagine a World... Posted by: Logic's Edge

Comments are closed-

To all proposing child-run farms....
Posted by: Elmowilcox on Aug 29, 2006 7:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sure, it would be good for a lot of kids to learn about the Earth and how to grow their own food, a quite commendable proposal actually. Just too bad about that whole rampant illiteracy thing we have going on in this country. With that said, do you really think it's a great idea to take away kid's classtime learning to read and do mathematics to learn how to grow their own strawberries? I don't think so.
I can even say that at some point in the future being able to cultivate the land will be more important than being able to read....again(as was in the past, and present in certain areas) as someone above already pointed out, but I just don't believe that this is a very important subject for a bunch of kids to learn. Especially considering that most live in the suburbs and cities where there isn't a half acre of viable farmland for miles any damn way. At best, it should be offerred as an elective at the middle school level in preparation for the 4H club in high school. Elementary school students belong in Elementary schools learning elementary skills for the rest of their lives, which will statiscally NOT involve ever tilling soil or picking veggies.
So that whole proposal to me isn't exactly a bad idea, just definitely not a good one that's going to solve much of anything for what's lost in the process.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I'm an example
Posted by: clairethereader on Aug 30, 2006 3:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I grew up eating school lunches just about every school day. Chicken nuggets, sausage pizza, and cheeseburgers were a few examples of things I was fed at school, and the most available vegetable was the potato. It's no wonder I was significantly overweight for the vast majority of my childhood.

I'm now a vegan with a very varied, healthy, balanced diet. I have a BMI of 21.2, perfectly clear skin, tons of energy, and I feel healthier than I've ever felt. I find it almost funny - during the day (I'm still in high school) I see most of my peers eating school lunch, overweight, with bad skin, looking tired...the connection is painfully obvious to me and apparently invisible to everyone else.

While it would be nice, I'm not saying every single student in my school and others around the country needs to go vegan or even vegetarian. I only wish the school lunch program and those who create it would shift to a more plant-based view of health, rather than one revolving around white bread, meat, scant fruit and vegetable selections, and milk. Doctors and dieticians point out that America is the fattest country in the world...can anything else be expected when we're teaching our children from the very beginning that these foods are the healthiest? Others have commented that good eating habits begin in the home, and, while this is true, the practice of good eating is difficult to make a lifelong habit when a person is being told for most of the first eighteen years of their life that a diet high in animal products and refined grains/sugars and low in fruits and vegetables is healthy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS