COMMENTS: 58
Don't Ignore 'An Inconvenient Truth'
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.
But some of the damage is already done. The Arctic ice shelf is melting, polar bears are drowning, and severe weather occurrences like hurricanes and heat waves are taking thousands of lives and causing millions in damages each year.
In the face of strong scientific consensus on the dangers and sources of global warming, many members of the Bush administration and the right wing continue to insist it is all part of a harmless natural process.
On Wednesday President Bush said, "[L]et's quit the debate about whether greenhouse gases are caused by mankind or by natural causes; let's just focus on technologies that deal with the issue." But an effective solution will not be found without acknowledging the human role in greenhouse gas emissions.
"An Inconvenient Truth," former Vice President Al Gore's new documentary that opened on Wednesday in New York and Los Angeles, challenges these myths and provides striking evidence that "[h]umanity is sitting on a ticking time bomb."
While the situation is severe, it's not hopeless. See how you can take action in the fight against global warming and help America kick its oil habit.
Climate change is here
Nineteen of the 20 hottest years on record have occurred since 1980, with 2005 marking the warmest yet. But proof of global warming goes beyond higher temperatures. In the far north, Inuit hunters have fallen through ice, and villages have lost ground to swelling seas. In the tropics, deluged islanders are making plans for permanent evacuation. Seas worldwide have risen four to eight inches in the last century; Massachusetts alone has lost 65 acres a year. Malaria has spread to higher altitudes in places such as the Colombia Andes, which is 7,000 feet above sea level.
Scientists are considering creating an official Category 6 for hurricanes "as evidence mounts that hurricanes around the world have sharply worsened over the past 30 years -- and all but a handful of hurricane experts now agree this worsening bears the fingerprints of man-made global warming."
A study published in Science Magazine analyzed 928 peer-reviewed scientific papers on global warming published between 1993 and 2003. Not a single one challenged the scientific consensus that the earth's temperature is rising due to human activity. In 2005, a top group of scientists convened by British Prime Minster Tony Blair met and examined the catastrophic impacts of global average temperature increases. The U.S. Climate Change Science Program, an intergovernmental agency, also concluded that humans are driving the warming trend through greenhouse gas emissions, noting "the observed patterns of change over the past 50 years cannot be explained by natural processes alone, nor by the effects of short-lived atmospheric constituents such as aerosols and tropospheric ozone alone."
It will get worse
Global warming is bad news for human life, despite the myths repeated by the right wing. "When it's not even clear that the warming we've seen is hurting us -- many argue that it's a boon, citing its benefits to agriculture and its potential to make severe climates more hospitable," writes National Review associate editor Jason Lee Steorts. But global warming won't just raise the earth's temperature a few degrees. The reality will be, as Gore puts it, "what someone has called 'a nature hike through the Book of Revelation. '"
We "have seen the impact of a couple of hundred thousand refugees from an environmental crisis. Imagine 100 million or 200 million," said Gore Wednesday on NBC's Today Show, talking about how many people could be displaced if global warming continues at its current pace. Assuming that it does, an increase in heat waves and a deterioration in air quality "will increase the risk of mortality and morbidity, principally in older age groups and the urban poor," according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Increases "in climate extremes (storms, floods, cyclones, etc.) associated with climate change would cause physical damage, population displacement, and adverse effects on food production, freshwater availability and quality, and would increase the risks of infectious disease epidemics, particularly in developing countries" and "negative health impacts are anticipated to outweigh positive health impacts." American Progress President and CEO John Podesta also notes the effect global warming will have on the world's poor: "Between 260 and 320 million people are likely to find themselves living in malaria infested areas by 2080," and in "Southern Africa and parts of the Horn, rainfall is predicted to decline by 10 percent by 2050, worsening already serious food shortages."
The administration is ignoring it
President Bush will be ignoring "An Inconvenient Truth" when the movie opens in the nation's capital, just as he has ignored the inconvenient truth of global warming throughout his administration. In 2000, candidate Bush pledged to "establish mandatory reduction targets for emissions of four main pollutants: sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, mercury and carbon dioxide." That promise was short-lived. One year later, Bush backed away from his campaign promise and in 2003, his administration ruled that carbon dioxide, the chief cause of global warming, was not a pollutant and did not need to be regulated.
The President still thinks that there is a "fundamental debate" over whether climate change is "manmade or natural," ignoring the consensus of the scientific community and the opinion of his own Environmental Protection Agency, which in 2002 stated that global warming "is real and has been particularly strong within the past 20 years...due mostly to human activities."
Bush's beliefs about climate change have gone beyond ignorance and have led to his administration's active suppression of the truth. In 2002 and 2003, the Bush administration allowed Philip A. Cooney, a former Exxon lobbyist with no scientific background, to doctor the findings of some of the government's premiere climate documents, "play[ing] down links between such [greenhouse gas] emissions and global warming." James Hansen, head of NASA's top institute studying the climate, recently said that he was being censored by the Bush administration from speaking out on global warming. "In my more than three decades in the government I've never witnessed such restrictions on the ability of scientists to communicate with the public," said Hansen.
The oil industry is fabricating 'science'
The overwhelming evidence on the urgency of global warming doesn't stop some skeptics from denying climate change. The oil industry-funded Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) and the National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA) have led the public relations effort to undercut the impact of Gore's film. CEI has received $1.6 million from ExxonMobil since 1998 and accepted funding from other oil companies through the American Petroleum Institute.
Earlier this month, CEI released a set of misleading ads claiming "Greenland's glaciers are growing." Actually, the study cited by the ad found there was an increase in snow accumulation on Greenland's interior.
Other studies show that glaciers are thinning on Greenland's coastal regions. Despite what CEI tried to argue, these findings fit with theories of global warming because "the thinning of the margins and growth in the interior Greenland is an expected response to increased temperatures and more precipitation in a warmer climate. These results present no contradiction to the accelerated sliding near the coasts." Another scientist whose research CEI used in the ad blasted the group for misrepresenting his research: "These television ads are a deliberate effort to confuse and mislead the public about the global warming debate. They are selectively using only parts of my previous research to support their claims."
The NCPA, which has received $390,000 from Exxon since 1998, has resorted to scare tactics, unleashing Sterling Burnett on Fox News to compare watching Gore to Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels. Fox News has also jumped on the alarmist bandwagon, airing a segment asking whether "An Inconvenient Truth" could "destroy our economy." In reality, a program to develop new sources of energy and rebuild our transportation infrastructure will create new jobs and stimulate the economy.
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aussie Kim on May 26, 2006 12:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ChristopherLL on May 26, 2006 4:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Living in the Sky Will not Save Earth
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mikethomasfioh on May 26, 2006 4:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Future in Our Hands movement advocates an appropriately simple way a life by the affluent as a primary means of addressing the twin threats of global warming and global poverty.
The dire predicted impacts of global warming will affect everyone. Even if you believe it is already too late, I still believe that a greater focus on values such as sharing, cooperation, fellowship and truth is the route to a healthier and happier and more fulfilling way of life for everyone. This in itself should be sufficient reason for personal change. There is a branch of FIOH in the USA but as yet it is small. Why not help it to grow?
There are two charities affiliated to the UK branch - Plant a Tree in Africa and the FIOH Education and Development Fund. If you donate to either of these you will be helping to relieve poverty in a direct and positive way. FIOH is open to anyone and has no party-political or religious/occult affiliations nor spiritual philosophy.
There will shortly be an option on the PATIA page to offset CO2 emissions by supporting tree planting in Africa - donations to this programme will be dedicated to the planting of new tees, not the replacement of existing ones. However FIOH does not in any way pretend that this is anything but a marginal contribution to the reduction of global warming. A far more radical approach is required.
Mike Thomas, FIOH International Network Coordinator
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: FUTURE IN OUR HANDS - BUT IT BEGINS IN CHILDHOOD
Posted by: Cathyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: solrev on May 26, 2006 5:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: we are history
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on May 26, 2006 6:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sojourner on May 26, 2006 7:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is insane to think that anyone can buy their way out of the destruction of our planet. Not all the money in the world is worth polluted water and air. We have seen it coming for at least 50 years.
The people on Easter Island, before its collapse, also imagined that something was going to come to save them from the elimination of their only resource for fuel, their trees. They consumed them faster than they could be replaced. The island population was nearly wiped out.
We, also, live on an island. Yes, it’s bigger than Easter Island. But it is subject to the same limitations and laws. Global warming is just another step on our way to being wiped out.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Naaah, just selfish.
Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: "We" must be suicidal?
Posted by: Cathyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ciccio on May 26, 2006 8:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
left wing fear-mongering. Today's BBC reports that avocado
and olive trees are now growing in London. That obviously has nothing to do with warmer weather, it is all part of itelligent
design.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Intelligent Design?
Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Intelligent Design?
Posted by: Ratskii
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mite on May 26, 2006 11:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our congress Senate Bill 517 and U.S. House Bill 2995 are bills to allow weather modifications for militay and civilian controls.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Elmowilcox on May 26, 2006 12:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Stockpile your batteries??
Posted by: Cathyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cathyc on May 26, 2006 4:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cerberus on May 26, 2006 4:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr Gore now claims that Global Warming is responsible for Katrina and that the extreme hurricane situation is caused by Global Warming. This is in fact as close to a lie as you can come, recent research has shown that the US will face 20-30 years of extreme hurricanes. This is not linked to global warming but to the normal hurricane cycle, it has and will occur over time. Yes, Global Warming might make it worse but only on a smaller scale but to claim that Katrina was caused by Global Warming is in my opinion a gross misrepresentation of facts.
Mr Gore calls for large human interventions. The Kyoto protocol will over a 100 year period delay global warming by 2 years, i.e. what we humans can do will have an impact of less than 2 %. It will have the amazing cost of 0.5 % in less GDP growth.
This does not mean that Global Warming is an issue, however it is an issue that we as humans have no or little control over. Instead of limiting carbon emissions we should do more research on alternative energy sources such as fuel cells and solar power. The first step we can take is to change energy production from oil, coal and gas to nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is clean and causes no Global Warming.
However if you live in a western society you are obliged to try to minimize your personal environmental impact but I may be excused if I find bleeding limousine liberal such as Mr Gore offensive. Poor Rich Guys finding that they have a conscience, a little late is it not?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Global warming is real and rapid...
Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Global warming is it a problem that can be solved? Maybe by Nuclear power
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jbohland on May 26, 2006 7:41 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Click here for global warming facts
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Sorry - note the link in the above post is a 7.3 MB PPT presentation
Posted by: jbohland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jonwilson on May 26, 2006 8:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But back to my point.
How can anyone take seriously a theory based on 100 years of data which ignores billions. It is like trying to take a pulse but only getting a millisecond reading.
And I would like for a believer to explain the fossils of palm trees and lizards found in Antarctica. Did polar bears drive SUV’s?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: No such thing as global warming
Posted by: tj256
» Jon Wilson is amusing.
Posted by: Artaraxl
» RE: No such thing as global warming
Posted by: Elmowilcox
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ernestcann on May 26, 2006 9:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been following this stuff since the early 1970's, and even back then the 'models' that were used were FLAWED!!!
But never mind the 'eco-spiritualist', yes that's right, it is a 'religion', amonst many 'elite' that Mother Earth is more than a fairy tale!
They believe that rocks, yes, that ROCKS are beings just like you!
Now anybody that believes that ceratinly may if they choose, but it is NOT scientific!
Al Gore, my god!
He's one of them!
If any one had read anything, you will soon find out the 'peer-reviewed' literature, is not always a credible source of reliable information, because, it is like Bush et al- 'if you do not agree with us, your stuff WILL NOT be published, nor accepted!'
I strongly urge those who are truly interested in our planets' climate, do something extraordinary...read the other side!!!!!
This planet has went through these phases long before mortal man showed up!!!
And see what you think then.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ernestcann
Posted by: cooky1257
» Is it just me?
Posted by: Artaraxl
» RE: Is it just me?
Posted by: EventHoriz0n
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jmp3954 on May 26, 2006 10:23 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pat Kittle on May 27, 2006 2:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On one side we have "free marketeers" mocking environmentalists for being religious, when their holy grail of endless growth is as faith-based as you can get. These are the same types who told us tobacco was good for us for decades after they knew it wasn't. Of course their current "tobacco science" is pathologically absurd to anyone who looks behind their corporate criminal curtain.
On the other side we have "environmentalists" who accept human population growth as inevitable, and forever pursue the fool's errand of mitigating it.
The first thing Al Gore ought to do is acknowledge that reversing population growth should be our top priority, and that means having half (or less!) as many kids as he had (he had four). This does not mean self-flagellation. It does not mean making kids feel guilty for being born.
It means changing course when everything else has failed. It means focusing light on a taboo diverse and powerful (business, church, open-borders, etc.) interests would much prefer to keep in the dark.
Let's face it, even if humans didn't all become saints, a much smaller human population would not be in the worst ecological catastophe in 65,000,000 years.
Environmentalists have an obligation to present honest information about ecological reality, and that means refusing to be intimidated by right-wing or left-wing ignoramouses.
Overbreeding IS overconsuming!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Pat Kittle
Posted by: alfredo_tomato
» RE: Pat Kittle - population is not the whole stroy
Posted by: Jesse
» RE: Pat Kittle - population is not the whole stroy -- Who said it was, anyway??
Posted by: Pat Kittle
» RE: Pat Kittle says "Hi!" to Detroit.
Posted by: Pat Kittle
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SadButTrue on May 27, 2006 9:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bring it on
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Bring it on
Posted by: Artaraxl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dikaiosyne on May 27, 2006 7:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Man! The interlopers abound
Posted by: Artaraxl
» RE: Man! The interlopers abound
Posted by: dikaiosyne
» RE: Man! The interlopers abound
Posted by: particle
» RE: Man! The interlopers abound
Posted by: Ratskii
» RE: Hoping to see "you all" DIE?
Posted by: ZPaul
» RE: an inconvenient LIE.
Posted by: alfredo_tomato
Comments are closed-
Posted by: concerned Canadian on May 28, 2006 8:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Northernlight on May 29, 2006 10:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds far fetched now but with the mind set of neo-cons.....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zombi on May 29, 2006 3:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aussie Kim on May 30, 2006 1:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One magazine from 1964 has an article in it entitled "Are cold places getting warmer?"
Global warming has been observed for a long, LONG time now and if we don't do something about it, then we really do just deserve to perish.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nickptar on May 30, 2006 10:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now why is nobody in the news talking about this?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: launcher on May 30, 2006 1:05 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's why I find it pretty scary that over the past 20 or so years scientists overwhelmingly accept human causes as contributing to global warming. Sure, it's still a theory. But the fact that so many of our world's experts agree with that theory, and continue to collect data that supports a human-factors climate model, is extremely convincing. I'm scared because, from what I know of that model, the predicted climate changes aren't going to be very compassionate to earth dwellers.
The ability of the White House and media to continuously downplay this rare consensus among scientists is frustrating. Do they really think scientists have some sort of secretive and perverse agenda to mislead the public and bask in the type of glory that only overzealous doomsayers enjoy? Whatever their reasons to deny the experts, it's a dangerous path for the world. I could say the same about the evolution/intelligent design debate, but that's for another time.
Go Al.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NemoInis on May 31, 2006 9:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: alfredo_tomato on Jun 1, 2006 11:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EventHoriz0n on Jul 18, 2006 7:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My two cents on the issue.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: usernames on Oct 19, 2006 10:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
vicodin cheap(greater than
Hydrocodone codof receptors,
get xanaxMany countries,
viagra samplesand medical
Phentermine 180or under
Valium without a prescriptionhas also
Valium drugblood to
Hydrocodone online without prescriptionas medicines
Phentermine without prescriptionnarrow margin
Valium mexicois a
Drugs valiumnarrow or
Phentermine 37the Food
Hydrocodone 5 500and prescription
Tramadol srtaken to
Generic hydrocodoneDrugs used
viagra overnightlogos (meaning
Tramadol without a prescriptionindex (close
Mexican hydrocodoneact on
xanax pillspharmacies, by
mexican xanaxwindow. This
viagra 50mgreceptors (which
Tramadol pillto kill
xanax online no prescriptionrestrictions, and
viagra mexicosaid to
Hydrocodone 7.5 500physicians in
buy viagra onlineAre these
vicodin 3596its behaviour
vicodin 500mgmedicine, but
Tramadol prescriptionof medication
Buy tramadolmost persons
Tramadol overnighteffects (desired
vicodin mexico(through the
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aussie Kim on May 26, 2006 12:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ChristopherLL on May 26, 2006 4:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Living in the Sky Will not Save Earth
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mikethomasfioh on May 26, 2006 4:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Future in Our Hands movement advocates an appropriately simple way a life by the affluent as a primary means of addressing the twin threats of global warming and global poverty.
The dire predicted impacts of global warming will affect everyone. Even if you believe it is already too late, I still believe that a greater focus on values such as sharing, cooperation, fellowship and truth is the route to a healthier and happier and more fulfilling way of life for everyone. This in itself should be sufficient reason for personal change. There is a branch of FIOH in the USA but as yet it is small. Why not help it to grow?
There are two charities affiliated to the UK branch - Plant a Tree in Africa and the FIOH Education and Development Fund. If you donate to either of these you will be helping to relieve poverty in a direct and positive way. FIOH is open to anyone and has no party-political or religious/occult affiliations nor spiritual philosophy.
There will shortly be an option on the PATIA page to offset CO2 emissions by supporting tree planting in Africa - donations to this programme will be dedicated to the planting of new tees, not the replacement of existing ones. However FIOH does not in any way pretend that this is anything but a marginal contribution to the reduction of global warming. A far more radical approach is required.
Mike Thomas, FIOH International Network Coordinator
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: FUTURE IN OUR HANDS - BUT IT BEGINS IN CHILDHOOD
Posted by: Cathyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: solrev on May 26, 2006 5:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: we are history
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on May 26, 2006 6:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sojourner on May 26, 2006 7:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is insane to think that anyone can buy their way out of the destruction of our planet. Not all the money in the world is worth polluted water and air. We have seen it coming for at least 50 years.
The people on Easter Island, before its collapse, also imagined that something was going to come to save them from the elimination of their only resource for fuel, their trees. They consumed them faster than they could be replaced. The island population was nearly wiped out.
We, also, live on an island. Yes, it’s bigger than Easter Island. But it is subject to the same limitations and laws. Global warming is just another step on our way to being wiped out.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Naaah, just selfish.
Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: "We" must be suicidal?
Posted by: Cathyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ciccio on May 26, 2006 8:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
left wing fear-mongering. Today's BBC reports that avocado
and olive trees are now growing in London. That obviously has nothing to do with warmer weather, it is all part of itelligent
design.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Intelligent Design?
Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Intelligent Design?
Posted by: Ratskii
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mite on May 26, 2006 11:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our congress Senate Bill 517 and U.S. House Bill 2995 are bills to allow weather modifications for militay and civilian controls.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Elmowilcox on May 26, 2006 12:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Stockpile your batteries??
Posted by: Cathyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cathyc on May 26, 2006 4:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cerberus on May 26, 2006 4:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr Gore now claims that Global Warming is responsible for Katrina and that the extreme hurricane situation is caused by Global Warming. This is in fact as close to a lie as you can come, recent research has shown that the US will face 20-30 years of extreme hurricanes. This is not linked to global warming but to the normal hurricane cycle, it has and will occur over time. Yes, Global Warming might make it worse but only on a smaller scale but to claim that Katrina was caused by Global Warming is in my opinion a gross misrepresentation of facts.
Mr Gore calls for large human interventions. The Kyoto protocol will over a 100 year period delay global warming by 2 years, i.e. what we humans can do will have an impact of less than 2 %. It will have the amazing cost of 0.5 % in less GDP growth.
This does not mean that Global Warming is an issue, however it is an issue that we as humans have no or little control over. Instead of limiting carbon emissions we should do more research on alternative energy sources such as fuel cells and solar power. The first step we can take is to change energy production from oil, coal and gas to nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is clean and causes no Global Warming.
However if you live in a western society you are obliged to try to minimize your personal environmental impact but I may be excused if I find bleeding limousine liberal such as Mr Gore offensive. Poor Rich Guys finding that they have a conscience, a little late is it not?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Global warming is real and rapid...
Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Global warming is it a problem that can be solved? Maybe by Nuclear power
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jbohland on May 26, 2006 7:41 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Click here for global warming facts
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Sorry - note the link in the above post is a 7.3 MB PPT presentation
Posted by: jbohland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jonwilson on May 26, 2006 8:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But back to my point.
How can anyone take seriously a theory based on 100 years of data which ignores billions. It is like trying to take a pulse but only getting a millisecond reading.
And I would like for a believer to explain the fossils of palm trees and lizards found in Antarctica. Did polar bears drive SUV’s?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: No such thing as global warming
Posted by: tj256
» Jon Wilson is amusing.
Posted by: Artaraxl
» RE: No such thing as global warming
Posted by: Elmowilcox
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ernestcann on May 26, 2006 9:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been following this stuff since the early 1970's, and even back then the 'models' that were used were FLAWED!!!
But never mind the 'eco-spiritualist', yes that's right, it is a 'religion', amonst many 'elite' that Mother Earth is more than a fairy tale!
They believe that rocks, yes, that ROCKS are beings just like you!
Now anybody that believes that ceratinly may if they choose, but it is NOT scientific!
Al Gore, my god!
He's one of them!
If any one had read anything, you will soon find out the 'peer-reviewed' literature, is not always a credible source of reliable information, because, it is like Bush et al- 'if you do not agree with us, your stuff WILL NOT be published, nor accepted!'
I strongly urge those who are truly interested in our planets' climate, do something extraordinary...read the other side!!!!!
This planet has went through these phases long before mortal man showed up!!!
And see what you think then.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ernestcann
Posted by: cooky1257
» Is it just me?
Posted by: Artaraxl
» RE: Is it just me?
Posted by: EventHoriz0n
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jmp3954 on May 26, 2006 10:23 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pat Kittle on May 27, 2006 2:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On one side we have "free marketeers" mocking environmentalists for being religious, when their holy grail of endless growth is as faith-based as you can get. These are the same types who told us tobacco was good for us for decades after they knew it wasn't. Of course their current "tobacco science" is pathologically absurd to anyone who looks behind their corporate criminal curtain.
On the other side we have "environmentalists" who accept human population growth as inevitable, and forever pursue the fool's errand of mitigating it.
The first thing Al Gore ought to do is acknowledge that reversing population growth should be our top priority, and that means having half (or less!) as many kids as he had (he had four). This does not mean self-flagellation. It does not mean making kids feel guilty for being born.
It means changing course when everything else has failed. It means focusing light on a taboo diverse and powerful (business, church, open-borders, etc.) interests would much prefer to keep in the dark.
Let's face it, even if humans didn't all become saints, a much smaller human population would not be in the worst ecological catastophe in 65,000,000 years.
Environmentalists have an obligation to present honest information about ecological reality, and that means refusing to be intimidated by right-wing or left-wing ignoramouses.
Overbreeding IS overconsuming!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Pat Kittle
Posted by: alfredo_tomato
» RE: Pat Kittle - population is not the whole stroy
Posted by: Jesse
» RE: Pat Kittle - population is not the whole stroy -- Who said it was, anyway??
Posted by: Pat Kittle
» RE: Pat Kittle says "Hi!" to Detroit.
Posted by: Pat Kittle
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SadButTrue on May 27, 2006 9:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bring it on
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Bring it on
Posted by: Artaraxl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dikaiosyne on May 27, 2006 7:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Man! The interlopers abound
Posted by: Artaraxl
» RE: Man! The interlopers abound
Posted by: dikaiosyne
» RE: Man! The interlopers abound
Posted by: particle
» RE: Man! The interlopers abound
Posted by: Ratskii
» RE: Hoping to see "you all" DIE?
Posted by: ZPaul
» RE: an inconvenient LIE.
Posted by: alfredo_tomato
Comments are closed-
Posted by: concerned Canadian on May 28, 2006 8:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Northernlight on May 29, 2006 10:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds far fetched now but with the mind set of neo-cons.....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zombi on May 29, 2006 3:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aussie Kim on May 30, 2006 1:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One magazine from 1964 has an article in it entitled "Are cold places getting warmer?"
Global warming has been observed for a long, LONG time now and if we don't do something about it, then we really do just deserve to perish.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nickptar on May 30, 2006 10:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now why is nobody in the news talking about this?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: launcher on May 30, 2006 1:05 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's why I find it pretty scary that over the past 20 or so years scientists overwhelmingly accept human causes as contributing to global warming. Sure, it's still a theory. But the fact that so many of our world's experts agree with that theory, and continue to collect data that supports a human-factors climate model, is extremely convincing. I'm scared because, from what I know of that model, the predicted climate changes aren't going to be very compassionate to earth dwellers.
The ability of the White House and media to continuously downplay this rare consensus among scientists is frustrating. Do they really think scientists have some sort of secretive and perverse agenda to mislead the public and bask in the type of glory that only overzealous doomsayers enjoy? Whatever their reasons to deny the experts, it's a dangerous path for the world. I could say the same about the evolution/intelligent design debate, but that's for another time.
Go Al.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NemoInis on May 31, 2006 9:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: alfredo_tomato on Jun 1, 2006 11:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EventHoriz0n on Jul 18, 2006 7:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My two cents on the issue.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: usernames on Oct 19, 2006 10:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
vicodin cheap(greater than
Hydrocodone codof receptors,
get xanaxMany countries,
viagra samplesand medical
Phentermine 180or under
Valium without a prescriptionhas also
Valium drugblood to
Hydrocodone online without prescriptionas medicines
Phentermine without prescriptionnarrow margin
Valium mexicois a
Drugs valiumnarrow or
Phentermine 37the Food
Hydrocodone 5 500and prescription
Tramadol srtaken to
Generic hydrocodoneDrugs used
viagra overnightlogos (meaning
Tramadol without a prescriptionindex (close
Mexican hydrocodoneact on
xanax pillspharmacies, by
mexican xanaxwindow. This
viagra 50mgreceptors (which
Tramadol pillto kill
xanax online no prescriptionrestrictions, and
viagra mexicosaid to
Hydrocodone 7.5 500physicians in
buy viagra onlineAre these
vicodin 3596its behaviour
vicodin 500mgmedicine, but
Tramadol prescriptionof medication
Buy tramadolmost persons
Tramadol overnighteffects (desired
vicodin mexico(through the
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
California Carbon Trading Allows Timber Companies to Sell CO2 Credits for Their Worst Logging Practices
How to Answer the Dumb Things Climate Deniers Say




