Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Al Gore's Assault on Global Warming

By Amanda Griscom Little, Grist.org. Posted May 23, 2006.


Gore is launching a book, a movie, and a new environmental group with one mission: convincing Americans that climate change is real.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Think you've been hearing a lot about global warming lately? If a new climate-focused group hatched by Al Gore has its way, you ain't seen nothin' yet.

After nine months of behind-the-scenes planning and wrangling, the Alliance for Climate Protection is now nearly ready for prime time. Gore spoke about the alliance in an exclusive interview. He said the group aims to raise big bucks for a single goal: "To move the United States past a tipping point on climate change, beyond which the majority of the people will demand of the political leaders in both parties that they compete to offer genuinely meaningful solutions to the crisis."

Practically speaking, this means launching a massive media and grassroots education campaign trumpeting the urgency of global warming and targeted at all manner of Americans -- "NASCAR fans, churchgoers, labor-union members, small businessmen, engineers, hunters, sportsmen, corporate leaders, you name it," said Gore -- with the assumption that "where public opinion goes, federal policy will follow."

With a leadership team that includes Brent Scowcroft, national-security adviser to presidents George H.W. Bush and Gerald Ford; Carol Browner, head of the U.S. EPA under Bill Clinton; and other heavies, the alliance could considerably pump up the volume of the green movement's barely audible public outreach on global warming. It plans to raise "tens of millions at least," said Browner. The group's official launch date is not confirmed, but will likely be in the coming weeks. The search for a CEO is under way, and board meetings have already commenced.

By all accounts, the alliance was Gore's idea, but he is choosing not to take a spot on the board of directors or participate in the governance of the group -- in the interest, he said, of avoiding confusion about its political objectives.

As the buzz intensifies around An Inconvenient Truth, Gore's global-warming documentary that hits theaters on May 24, and a forthcoming book of the same title, so does speculation that he plans to vie for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008. Gore dismissed the suggestion of a link between his public climate activism and a 2008 bid as "totally, totally absurd," but he knows he can't dodge his political image.

"As hard as I try, I don't think I can come off as completely nonpartisan," he told us with a knowing chuckle. But the alliance, he said, must be "completely and totally insulated from any political innuendo. I feel very strongly that the climate crisis needs to be redefined as a moral -- not a political -- issue."

That may explain why three of the five current members of the alliance's board of directors are high-profile Republicans -- in addition to Scowcroft, they include Lee Thomas, EPA chief under Ronald Reagan, and Teddy Roosevelt IV, venture capitalist and great-grandson of his namesake, the GOP president. "We are very sensitive that this not be misconstrued as a political campaign," Roosevelt told us. "[O]ur mission is by no means to endorse legislative solutions or political candidates."

According to Browner, the board will likely double in size in the coming weeks, adding leaders who will further reinforce the bipartisan nature of the group, representing the interests of labor, science, religion, underprivileged communities, and corporate America.

The More the Merrier

Only one board member -- Larry Schweiger, president of the National Wildlife Federation -- hails from an environmental organization, and, says Schweiger, no other enviro-group heads will be added to the top-tier leadership. It's a deliberate and notable shift in strategy given that last year Gore started initial discussions about the alliance with members of the Green Group, a behind-the-scenes coalition of leaders of big national environmental organizations.

Those discussions stirred up tactical disputes among enviros. "There have long been heated debates within the environmental community over how to proceed with a unified climate strategy," said Browner. "Partnering with a broad spectrum of interests -- from national security to labor and industry -- has liberated and broadened the discussion."

Browner declined to get specific about the discussions, but according to other insiders close to the negotiations who requested anonymity, green leaders worried, among other things, that a formal alliance between them and Gore would hamper their ability to reach out to moderate and conservative Americans. Potential funders worried, meanwhile, that leaders of the big national green groups might not be able to make savvy use of tens of millions of dollars earmarked for a climate campaign, given that their public outreach efforts on the issue have produced only lackluster results thus far.

Said Gore, "We came to realize that it was a disservice to the climate campaign to frame [the issue] as an environmental concern, not a universal concern -- a fundamental threat to all citizens, not just those who identify with the green movement."

Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club and a regular participant in alliance leadership meetings, applauds the intent to broaden the alliance beyond the traditional environmental community. "The leadership absolutely benefits from diversity," he said. "This is one of the most exciting things I've worked on in years. It represents progress."

Schweiger is equally enthusiastic about including folks who aren't classic enviros. "There are so many people who want to stop global warming for reasons of strengthening national security or protecting God's creation or promoting new energy markets -- not necessarily because they want to join the conservation movement," he said.

Added Browner, "There's nobody out there who is weaving all the interests together around a single-focus climate campaign. We are the first."

Fundraising Awareness

While Gore is distancing himself from the operations of the alliance, he's diving headfirst into fundraising. "My sole official role will be to help raise money," he said. "[My wife] Tipper and I will try to be the largest donors." He has already donated the roughly $250,000 he received as an advance from Rodale, publisher of his new book. And Paramount Classics, distributor of "An Inconvenient Truth," has committed to donate 5 percent of the film's domestic theatrical gross, guaranteeing a minimum of $500,000. Rodale is also rumored to be donating a portion of proceeds from book sales.

Gore and board members estimate that the alliance has lined up millions in funding so far, even before its official launch. "Already we have a lot of major donors who have agreed to bring large sums," said Gore. One person close to the project, who declined to be named because fundraising specifics are still officially under wraps, said that large contributions are being sought from billionaire philanthropists George Soros and Ted Turner and Silicon Valley bigwigs including Vinod Khosla, cofounder of Sun Microsystems, and Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple. (Gore, it should be noted, sits on Apple's board of directors.)

The alliance will also seek out modest donations from average Americans. "I think of it as a United Way of global warming," said Schweiger.

Exactly how this money will be spent remains to be seen, and is a subject of some controversy. Schweiger estimated that "more than 60 percent of the funding will go to national and local media projects aimed at mass persuasion," and the rest would be allocated to grassroots groups and institutions that are working to educate the public about climate change.

Gore has been a strong proponent of using paid advertising. He and some board members said the alliance could do for climate change what the Truth Campaign, launched in 1999, has been credited with doing for the anti-smoking crusade -- trigger a cultural and political shift with print and television advertising.

Jonah Bloom, executive editor of the trade magazine Advertising Age, cautions against such a comparison, noting that the Truth Campaign had the advantage of $2 billion in funding, much of it from a settlement with the tobacco industry, and, perhaps more importantly, had a very simple message: smoking kills. "The difficulty with a climate-change outreach is that it's a concept that is still very confusing and nebulous to most Americans -- you have to at once explain what it is, give it substance, and then caution against it," he said.

Alliance board members said they have the advantage of leveraging online media -- blogging, e-video, viral marketing -- to launch an even more sophisticated, and more affordable, messaging juggernaut. Gore argued that the real power of the Truth Campaign was the "extremely clever" design of the ads and the talent behind them, and said that "the most creative people in the American advertising industry have volunteered to help the alliance" with its ads.

Already climate skeptics are mounting an opposition with paid ads of their own. This week, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, unveiled two 60-second TV ads pillorying "global warming alarmists." They'll air in more than a dozen cities nationwide, timed to coincide with the release of Gore's documentary.

"We'll be quick to respond," said Schweiger, explaining that the alliance plans to issue a request for proposals to major advertising and design-consulting firms in the next few weeks.

Not everybody associated with the alliance supports an ad blitz. "You can't build social movements with paid advertising," said one person who has been close to the group's negotiations, but spoke on condition of anonymity. "That money would go a lot further if it was given to the countless grassroots organizations in cities and states that are already making tremendous local progress but have limited resources."

What everyone does agree on is the need for a bottom-up appeal to the American masses rather than a top-down campaign focused on leaders in Washington. "The momentum right now has to come from the grassroots," Gore told Muckraker. "I don't think it's gonna come from Washington. In fact, I know it won't come from Washington."

"The legislative jujitsu approach has been tried and has failed miserably," he continued. "The idea that we can tweak a law in a minor way here and call that a solution is delusional. This administration is a subdivision of the polluting interests, which means the incremental approach is actually doing more harm than good because it misleads some people into thinking we are actually making progress, when in fact we are moving in the wrong direction at top speed."

Reach Out and Teach Me

But can a group dominated by policy wonks really mobilize the grassroots and effectively reach out to new communities?

Gene Case, founder of Avenging Angels, a politically focused advertising firm, said a heavy-hitting climate outreach campaign is much-needed, but will require better branding. "Let's start with the title of the group -- the Alliance for Climate Protection. That's a branding flaw right there," he said. "What a snooze! It's hardly distinguishable from the Environmental Protection Agency. At least they could have picked an acronym that pops."

The current board lacks representatives of youth groups, ethnic minorities, and other key segments of the American populace -- constituencies that would need to be on board to make any large uprising successful.

Browner said this point is not lost on her: "I'm well aware that my 18-year-old would much rather hear [a climate message] from some skateboarding champion than from me." She said the alliance will partner with youth, environmental-justice, and other groups to help bridge divides and spread the word, and she emphasized that it will diversify as the board grows and a steering committee is formed.

Meanwhile, what the alliance does have going for it is timing. Between record-high gasoline prices, predictions of historic drought this summer, and warnings that another brutal hurricane season could be approaching, the tipping point on climate change may well be nigh.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Amanda Griscom Little writes the Muckraker column for Grist Magazine.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Al Gore for President
Posted by: greentime on May 23, 2006 4:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush is fool.
Al Gore is a leader.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the time is now
Posted by: snoringbear on May 23, 2006 5:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THANK YOU. I would support this idea, if you need my help just ask. I am a struggling American who believes that just because the current regime says global warming does not exist does not make it true. Keep us informed on how we can be of assistance. My family and I went from somewhat making it to having to doing without due to rising energy costs(400.00 a month just to heat our home). I have long been a proponent of alternate energies and fuels. The time has come to stop corporate america from poisoning our children, environment,food, and running over all americans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the time is now Posted by: kryptx
hope
Posted by: rsaxto on May 23, 2006 5:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope the Gore/others strategy works so that all the lying baboons who deny the reality of global warming will be completely Gored out of positions of power. It would be good to have a government that promotes reality instead of one that promotes bullshit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Big Important Step
Posted by: Riverside on May 23, 2006 5:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are so many cautions, scoffs and denials surrounding the issue of dramatic climate change that having an organization that begins to put a focus onto the issue is critical.

Global Warming is producing dramatic climate change now and well into the years ahead. The contributing factors to that warming are multiple and quite varied. Humankind is an important component but by far not the only one. I hope the Gore group emphasizes this and also points out that the most immediate action is, however, reducing the impact of the automobile. Just getting improved fuel efficiency, without even going to alternative fuels will take us a good ways down the road and will give us more time to work on the other issues. If U. S. auto makers and the U. S. petroleum lords refuse to help in this, then We The People need to throw the doors open even wider to Toyota and friends so the we can start solving this problem - NOW.

Buy American was great and I supported it, but now our motto needs to be: Buy Fuel Efficiency, hopefully American, but from whomever is doing it right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I thought Gore was a cigar store indian...
Posted by: LMNOP on May 23, 2006 6:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...while Vice President and while running for president he was so wooden

Likewise with Bob Dole. Here was a guy with no personality I thought in 1996 (and before as senate majority leader. Then I saw something else:

I remember seeing Bob Dole in a casual television interview in a nonploitical venue, and being genuinely impressed with him, but a few years after his unsuccessful bid for the White House in 1996. At that time, he had appeared just about as adynamic and personality-free as Al Gore did four years later. So I was genuinely surprised to find that a witty, intelligent and self-effacing man beneath that wooden campaigning persona, and I thought, what an unnatural process campaigning is to turn somebody that I could like if I knew him into somebody that I never want to hear speak again.

Back to Gore now. Same thing. I didn't realize that he had gonads until the Bush II years when he wrote and presented a series of dynamic pro-environment speeches. Suddenly, I could see somebody worth voting for rather that just a recipient of a voting-against-Bush vote. I voted for him, but with my nose plugged.

Had this facet of Gore been showcased instead of suppressed, he might have gotten some of those infamous Nader votes

So just how pathological is the political system that campaign managers suck the minds and souls out of candidates images and present such an unattractive candidate just at the point that it matters most to do otherwise?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I solve problems for a living
Posted by: solrev on May 23, 2006 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not believe a group of politicians could ever even comprehend a scientific solution to the problem. Politicians make political decisions. I do not believe they are open minded enough to observe the problem, determine root causes and find solutions. Scientists could solve the problem in 15 years and make every body on this planet an offer they could not refuse. Unfortunately, politicians will always be in the way. Politicians will jump on some bandwagon solution make the Sunday talk shows and nothing will happen. For instance, let us increase Mpg’s in automobiles. The benefits are less foreign oil dependence and less pollution. What if reducing particle emission in automobiles increases the effect of global warming substantially, because of global dimming? End the problem in 15 years with collateral benefits beyond the imagination. That is what I would do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It will never happen Posted by: solrev
Unfortunately, anybody but Gore would have been better
Posted by: medstudgeek on May 23, 2006 7:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The poor guy should have swallowed his pride and found a figurehead. It's too bad, because if ever we would have had a president who had the know-how and drive to do something about it, it would have been him. But he's forever associated with the election of 2000. People are going to see this and go, "Oh, look at the loser candidate trying to make a comeback." This will further politicize the global warming debate, because it will be seen as something Democrats believe and Republicans don't, just when the public was beginning to come around.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lip Service and Empty Promises
Posted by: AlanSmithee on May 23, 2006 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After 8 years of abetting the corporate-friendly Clinton administration rape our environment, suddenly we're supposed to believe in this shiney new greener Beltway Al?

I-do-not-think-so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

control the enviroment by stopping mass immigration
Posted by: cry0fan on May 23, 2006 9:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the overclass that ranches America has always tried to cram as many people as possible in here. They use propaganda to manufacture consent.

I love the outdoors and was raised on a ranch, but I really think global warming is overblown.

If you want the support of the middle class, concentrate on real issues that touch our everyday lives. Global warming and cooling happens naturally quite often through cycles of temperature variation.

Global warming is the scare tactic that has replaced.... NUCLEAR RADIATION!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to Wake Up or Hit the Snooze Button?
Posted by: Northernlight on May 23, 2006 1:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I first became aware of Global Warming in the early 70's. It was always a someday in the future if, if, if. The if's came to pass and are here now.
Fact:The frantic melting of both the northern and Antartic ice sheets has become the most recent example that it is not some little thing to dismiss as part of the natural cycle of warming and cooling.
Fact: The concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased steadly since the start of the Industrial Revolution.
Fact: Average yearly world temperature is rising.
Fact: The oceans levels are rising.

Global Warming is not a theory, it is a fact.
The present debate reminds me of the Ozone debate of the early 80's. At that time I worked for a company that distributed several chemicals that were on the list of substances that were destroying the ozone layer. They were in total denial of the science for one reason, they had product to sell.
Science won out and now the ozone layer is slowly healing.
This time the stakes are as high if not higher but the solution will be much stronger medicine.
The average person feels powerless to do anything about global warming. They feel that they are on a ride to somewhere they don't want to go but are unable to change their own lives let alone the world.
We all know of the stories of people who are chemicaly dependant and how often they do not change untill they hit bottom. As citizens of the world we do not have that luxuury as hitting bottom will be too late to change.
With the present way of framing the situation, most people just get depressed and then say F**K it and divert their thoughts to "happy" thoughts, like celebrity news.
I hope Mr. Gore can reframe the situation so that people will feel that they can make a difference and be agents of change and not victims of change.
Global Warming is here and now. For our children and grandchildren and their children to survive, nothing short of total rethinking of our existential philosophy of living will allow the continuation of humanity.
Our life styles of consume at all costs was created to drive the engines of economy and the intrinsic values of society to support commerce are what created the problem, more of the same thinking cannot fix it. It is beyond a nice new technology to fix the problem. We donot have to crash and burn.
We still live on Spaceship Earth (that was a truth based frame back when or what ever collective image you would like to use) and we still can change the future as we are still creating it now.
Every one can be part of the solution as everyone has been part of the cause. No pointing fingers now, we have all consumed stuff, that was part of the problem.
Are we waking up to a new day of collective action, or shall we hit the snooze button and die in our slumbers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Time to Wake Up. Posted by: Kayuqtakpak
Who Needs Gore When...
Posted by: ZPaul on May 23, 2006 11:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Apparently Mr. Gore is not aware that President already has a team of knowledgeable top-notch advisors to let him know when there´s going to be a tsunami, or any other meteorological phenomenon he says is caused by "global warming". At the top of the list is spiritual giant Pat Robertson who´s already got a direct line to God (like the President, but Robertson´s got the "divine climate help line"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who Needs Gore When... Posted by: Northernlight
Gore burns 439,500 LBS OF FUEL to attend global warming summit
Posted by: jonwilson on May 23, 2006 11:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember 1997 anybody? When Gore attended the UN Global Warming summit in Koyto, Japan? All he did when there was say "The most vulnerable part of the Earth's environment is the very thin layer of air clinging near to the surface of the planet, that we are now so
carelessly filling with gaseous wastes that we are actually altering the
relationship between the Earth and the Sun - by trapping more solar
radiation under this growing blanket of pollution that envelops the entire
world," Vice President Gore

The funny thing is he burned 439,500 LBS OF FUEL to attend the summit in Air Force II.

Oh, and when he attended the Sierra Club’s SF yearly gathering last year he got dropped off in a giant Chevy Suburban at the back. You can find the picture with a simple Google search. Oh, and the best is the fact he and other tree huggers like Huffington and Oprah fly private jets every chance they get. But they tell us little people we need to drive hybrids!

The real funny thing is some people take them seriously. Oh man.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lorraine
Posted by: Lorraine on Jun 7, 2006 12:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a very fine product available that reduces auto emissions by 85%. It has all been documented. It is called EnviroMax Plus, a fuel catalyst with a U.S. patent. Engines burn cooler, and 98% of the fuel is properly burned. Visit www.trumpatthepump.com for more information about this exciting product.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ignore the tec and spread the fear.
Posted by: edexter on Jun 10, 2006 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alot of us would like to see idea's that can have popular apeal. I.E. reduce pollution and increase supply there is one company in point that is mentioned on the doe website but wasn't mentioned in bush's speach. http://www.veridium.com/technologies.php?show=3p#3p the algae is from yellowstone and it makes ethonal and bio-diesel byproducts of refining while reducing polution. You dont have to win to win but without any idea's that states (we are 50 different countries at least with state rights) or the feds can borrow befour or after the election it is sorta useless. http://www.dexrow.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement