Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Environment

Save Family Farms, Save America

By Willie Nelson, AlterNet. Posted April 27, 2006.


It's time to abandon the failed model of industrial agriculture and join the Good Food movement: embrace healthy, delicious food that makes the entire country stronger.
042706_story2
042706_story2
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

[Editor's Note: This article appeared in the Spring 2006 issue of Waterkeeper, the official magazine of Waterkeeper Alliance.]

As one of the founders of Farm Aid, I have watched with admiration and a good amount of satisfaction the growth of what many now call the "Good Food Movement" -- the growing interest in and demand for organic, humanely-raised and family farm-identified food that is transforming the way America grows its food and how our food gets to our tables.

While it might seem obvious to many, good food comes from farms with healthy soil and clean water. I've always believed that the most important people on the planet are the ones who plant the seeds and care for the soil where they grow. As the stewards of the land, family farmers are the foundation of this movement, as well as its guarantor.

No one can say they planted the original seed that gave rise to this movement, but many can claim they have helped nurture and cultivate its growth. Farm Aid's vision for America is to have many family farmers on the land -- a vision born out of our strong conviction that who grows our food and who cares for the land and water is of vital national importance; that farmers and their fields are the fabric that holds our country together.

Many have asked me, "What is the Good Food movement?" The Good Food movement isn't just about good and delicious food -- although this is certainly one of its greatest achievements. The Good Food movement is at the center of some of the most important issues and debates that will define American society for years to come: issues like stewardship of our soil and water, local and democratic control of decision making and land use, health and nutrition and a thriving and sustainable food and farm economy needed to feed and fuel America.

While good, healthy, fresh food from family farms is the most visible product of the movement that each of us can enjoy, the movement stands for much more. It represents the interests of all who care about the future of this land, its resources and its people. As members of this movement and as eaters, the food we choose to buy connects us directly to those who produced it and to the multiple reasons why it is in our own interests to see this movement flourish.

Natural resources

The future of safe and sound food production depends on taking care of the most basic resources needed to grow food: soil and water. Family farmers eat the food they grow in their fields and drink the water from their wells. They know that they have to take care of the soil and water in order to pass on the promise of the farm's bounty to the next generation. Sustainable family farms are the alternative to the large-scale industrial farms that erode our soil and pollute our waterways. Excessive chemicals, soil erosion, runoff from hog factories laced with hormones and antibiotics and the growing threats of widespread genetic contamination from genetically engineered crops threaten our capacity to grow the food we need to feed our country. By supporting family farms through the Good Food movement, we are all helping to ensure that our children and our children's children inherit a healthy and resilient environment.

Health and nutrition

Good food leads to good nutrition and good health. There's no comparison between fresh, organic food at the local farmers market and the mass-produced, additive-laden, highly processed stuff that corporations would have us think is real food. The rising epidemics of childhood obesity and diabetes are clearly linked to the highly processed food peddled to kids and served in school cafeterias. The Good Food movement is helping to turn this situation around, bringing farm-fresh food grown by local farmers into school lunch programs. A diet of fresh, wholesome food will improve health outcomes for kids and provide new direct markets for family farmers.

Strong local economies

Family farms are the engines for economic vitality, in both rural communities as well as urban areas that benefit from jobs created by vibrant local and regional food systems. When family farms thrive, so do main street businesses. The Good Food movement is creating new markets and opportunities that help farmers stay on their land and provides hope for new and young farmers to make farming their life. A growing number of those now participating in direct farm-to-consumer marketing are first generation farmers! The more we keep farming local, the stronger the community. Participating in local and regional food and farm markets helps keep food dollars circulating in the local economy -- rather than increasing the profits of distant corporations that suck the dollars and the life out of our communities.

Energy

Many Americans are becoming aware of the startling and troubling fact about our food system known as "food miles:" on average, each food item travels 1500 miles before arriving to our tables. It makes little sense to burn fossil fuels that pollute the environment to ship apples across the country and around the world when local growers can provide us with fresh apples, the purchase of which keeps dollars in the local economy. By strengthening local food production, the Good Food movement is reducing the distance food travels and the ecological footprint of American agriculture.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Willie Nelson is the president and founder of Farm Aid.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Win-Win Situation
Posted by: midge on Apr 27, 2006 12:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excellent article. As it said, this movement has the potential to save family farming, which for a long time has been on the decline because of an inability to compete with larger business, keep people healthy, keep the environment and animals safe, and create strong local economies that can resist the efforts of big corporations. May this movement continue to grow and strenghten, save family farming and send the message to the food and agricultural corporations that we no longer want their junk-filled food that is grown by wasting and polluting good land and pumping hormones and antibiotics into animals and packaged and processed by workers who get paid very little, work in horrible conditions and often prevented from taking breaks even to go to the bathroom, and often face work-related injuries and I think this is the longest sentence I've ever written ;-) Well, I guess I should say those of us who are lucky enough to be able to afford and have access to fresh, organically grown farm food, but hopefully this will include more and more people. Perhaps someday people will be making a good, comfortable living on a farm rather than having to labor in horrible conditions for low wages at Tyson.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Win-Win Situation Posted by: oldguy
Sweetening the deal...
Posted by: RoffleTheWaffle on Apr 27, 2006 2:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm rather surprised hydroponics wasn't mentioned here either, though I realize that the article does focus on traditional farming methods and practices. Contrary to popular belief, hydroponic gardening and farming is extremely easy, very cheap in the short and long term, and hydroponic growing facilities and small hydroponic gardens alike boast unmatchable efficiency and quality of produce compared to traditional soil-grown crops.

Now, that's not to say that growing food in soil is a bad thing. It's not, and a lot of people would feel a lot more comfortable eating something grown in the dirt than something grown in a greenhouse. This is especially true since science seems to be the taint of everything these days. Genetic engineering and greenhouses, however, do not run hand in hand. Greenhouses and hydroponic farming make it so we don't have to play God by allowing us to create ideal conditions for plants to live in without modifying them on a genetic level.

As soon as I can produce a successful crop with my own to show off, I'm going to be promoting home hydroponic gardening here in my home town. It's incredibly easy, extremely efficient, and you don't even have to have a greenhouse to grow a garden this way. (Though there are benefits, and greenhouses are cheaper and easier to build than ever.) It also makes it possible for people to grow large quantities of high quality plants where open, good soil is scarce, such as in the inner city. It's definitely a good thing to look into if you're wanting to get your feet wet - no pun intended - in home and family agriculture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sweetening the deal... Posted by: kww355
» "organic "? Is that the real goal? Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Sweetening the deal... Posted by: RoffleTheWaffle
» "Play God"? Posted by: nickptar
Hum.
Posted by: mazur on Apr 27, 2006 2:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article, but supposing that the number of people who want good food grows, where will we get all the farmers? Will there be enough folks willing to get up at 5am and get their hands dirty every day?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hum. Posted by: Roverton
» RE: Hum. Posted by: Nheduanna
» RE: Hum. Posted by: jpinder
Of Course
Posted by: O.B.Server on Apr 27, 2006 3:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People will be quite happy to get their hands dirty and get up at 6:00 AM if they are properly compensated. The cheap food we have now is just that: Cheap. We worry about the quality of gasoline we put in our cars but we are more than happy to put trash in our bodies at a high price. There is little appreciation for good food. Why? We are brainwashed by our society which includes corporate and government powers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Any farmers on AlterNet?
Posted by: anothername on Apr 27, 2006 4:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As with many other income-producing jobs or careers, as the prices paid and interest by men decreases, women are stepping in to own and to run farms. Many farmers, cattle people, or other food producers/managers are opting to go for small farms and herds so they can be managed easily by just a few people.

Farming and raising animals for food is a lifestyle choice. As it is now, though, over 90% of farmers in America work jobs off their land to give them the money they need to farm. I suspect that the most secure income parts of the industry are those that are in the middle or in the supply chain. In other words, a feedlot will keep getting in cattle and a seed company will keep selling seeds, even as their profits and volume of business wax and wane based on the economy, but the owners probably do not have to work another job to pay for their primary jobs.

Yes, farmers may get up early, but they know the land, understand the nuances of temperature and moisture, and, when times are good, can have houses and lifestyles that are not much different than many suburbanites.

There was a discussion yesterday on the need of cars in cities. This, too, is tied to the good food movement. As we take up more and more land for housing, parking lots, and box stores, we have to ship food ever increasing distances. Small community garden plots may help a few people, but they do not provide a city's needs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Any farmers on AlterNet? Posted by: zooeyhall
but wait there's more
Posted by: pal Val on Apr 27, 2006 4:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice to hear this. For me, good food and good company are the basic simple pleasures of life. Sharing a good meal with people, eating food grown and prepared with respect, talking with friends, these are things that bring satisfaction to the soul for many of us. Nothing to do with the aquisition of stuff.
Also, Willie's biodiesel venture should include the goal of organically grown crops for the fuel, biodeisel makes little sense if pesticides and chemical ferilizers are used.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Johnny Come lately
Posted by: nobuko on Apr 27, 2006 5:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been gardening since I rented, at the age of 20, now own my homes, at the age of 58! Nothing big, but enough to eat from during the summer months, and enough to cann to take me through the winter months. Veggies that I use a lot of during the year, like tomatoes, cumcumbers, hot peppers; these items are easy to grown. I've ALWAYS shopped at a butcher where you can SELECT your meats; I dislike it when I have to buy it pre-packaged. I guess I'm lucky in a sense in that my system is very sensitive, and will not digest pre-package foods with preservatives. Then many wonder why we have so many deseases; we're eating too many things that we have NO IDEA where it came from and how it was prepared, and the preservatives used to maintain them.

One POSITIVE thing that came from a very humble beginning, is that you learn to appreciate the earth, and what it was MEANT FOR! GROW AS MUCH AS YOUR OWN FOODS and PRESERVE THEM! Another Positive is learning to SHARE, WHICH IS PRACTICALLY "UNHEARD" OF TODAY!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Johnny Come lately Posted by: bettsoff
» Sharing Posted by: kww355
» RE: Sharing Posted by: bettsoff
» RE: Johnny Come lately Posted by: oldguy
"Let them eat Organic Food"
Posted by: finleyd on Apr 27, 2006 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One big issue not addressed here is how will we feed those who cannot afford the certainly more expensive "boutique food". This includes both the poor here in the US and those who live overseas (in spite of all the food imports we are still a major supplier of grain, meat, and poultry to the world). This will get worse when we consider that we are likely to dedicate a fair amount of grain production to energy and plastic feedstocks as petroleum gets more expensive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Let them eat Organic Food" Posted by: Reginleif
You are what you eat
Posted by: dahliaqueen on Apr 27, 2006 5:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a very small scale organic farmer, i work in my fields happy with the knowledge that i contribute to the health of the planet as a whole and to myself and friends with every pesticide-free vegetable that makes it's way to our table.
Willie is a great spokesperson for sustainable agriculture and we can all do our part by supporting your local farmers at the farmer's markets all over the country - and for those of you who live in the city or condo, you can grow your green beans and lettuce and tomatoes in containers anywhere that gets 7 hours of full sun per day- a modern victory garden. Search www.localharvest.org for nearby farms and the usga.gov list of countrywide farmers markets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You are what you eat
Posted by: dahliaqueen on Apr 27, 2006 5:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That would be www.usda.gov

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You are what you eat Posted by: oldguy
Willie Nelson? THE Willie Nelson?
Posted by: bettsoff on Apr 27, 2006 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everytime I hear from this man I find he's got his fingers in another delicious pie. Bravo, sir.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Willie Nelson / Tom Jefferson
Posted by: Jennelle on Apr 27, 2006 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thomas Jefferson believed fervently that the farmer, the ones who lived as one with the land was THE foundation of democracy, and whitout farmers, the nation would be derstroyed. He also railed against the greed of "corporations,bankers and developers" and believed that government must control that greed. Do we have the America we the people truely want? Or do we have a nation of,by and for the corporate parasites? Juts consider how much you paid the last time you filled your tank, and how tastless and bland your food is I live in an area that was once the garden of the midatlantic, with many and varied local and regional networks. Most of that is gone, into corp farmiong and importing long distance. With most of the cost of our food in the packing and shipping, why would anyone continue this? Yes, we still have local peoduce and livestock. And I just heard we have a bio diesel refinery here. But then i remember when the farmers market was huge...now it's fragmented all over the area. The last time I went to my favorite blueberry farm, it was a housing developement of souless McMansions. There we go with the developers, destroying for the sake of their profits. And notice who wants less control and regulation? So they can destroy America while they profit. Ok, Ill get off my soap box, but I do love this land and nation,and it's people and principles, and I hate to see it being destroyed for the profit of the few who care nothing for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I love Willie.
Posted by: Longdream on Apr 27, 2006 6:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's eternal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop the Farmer
Posted by: mite on Apr 27, 2006 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Willie Bless your effort for the farmers of this nation. I am not going to go into the issues of how powers are trying to destroy the farmer as I am sure you know about these things. But I believe the people need to know about weather control and what advances are being made to control weather. Check out recent legislation and Air Force University 2025. I can not think a better way to destroy the farmer but control the weather. Another thing if water is controlled by corporations instead of the public, what better way to control the masses.
Keep up the good work Willie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stop the Farmer Posted by: nickptar
» RE: Stop the Farmer Posted by: mite
I'm not sure Willie Nelson really wrote this article
Posted by: rbohan on Apr 27, 2006 7:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anybody ever hear him say "inextricably"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

otto
Posted by: otto on Apr 27, 2006 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't like gas prices, but maybe the flip side will be that we will all start buying locally from farmer's markets, etc, rather than pay the high prices coming from shipping food thousands of miles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Right On Willie
Posted by: radnar on Apr 27, 2006 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This guy is for real.

I like progressive rock better than country but Willie sings to my heart.

I like many types of films more than westerns but "Barbarosa" is one of my all time favorite movies.

This post and his work with Farm Aid and Biodiesel and others just increases my personal respect for the man.

He is a real American Hero.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eat Locally!
Posted by: macdon1 on Apr 27, 2006 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes yes and yes to what you say Mr. Nelson. I live in the Central Valley of California where so much is grown and it's even hard to get locally produced food here. When we do, it is massively better than the junk from the supermarket. Also, ancient wisdom tells us that when you eat locally produced foods, your body works better, you have fewer allergies, etc. Amazingly, when our local soils are conserved and cared for, what is grown in them produces exactly what our bodies need to live and thrive in the place where we live! I am working hard to get a little bit of land (really tough in California) so I can grow my own stuff now that I am retired. Too bad developers are so greedy that community gardens are out of the question in most places and the wonderful, living fertile land around me is being killed by ugly tract McMansions. Build now, pay big later.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Veganism is the answer
Posted by: gadfly on Apr 27, 2006 10:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This piece was good as far as it goes, but there really is something huge unaddressed here - humanely raised animals end up on death-row, so to speak, just as surely as factory-farmed animals do. The real win-win scenario is veganism which frees up enormous amounts of resources that go into producing meat. Medical science has come to realize that, nutritionally, we need zero meat, zero dairy, zero cholesterol, zero eggs in our diets to remain healthy. In fact, meat and dairy consumers need to really watch out for increased risks of heart disease, cancer, high blood pressure, obesity, high cholesterol, diabetes, gallstones and Mad Cow Disease. Veganism makes the world much better for animals and there is more plant food available to the world's hungry since prodigious amounts of plant food wouldn't go to fatten up animals for the kill. Veganism also promotes ecological sanity. Let us free ourselves from our addiction to animal products and end this eternal holocaust we've inflicted on animals for eons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Veganism is - Yes/No Posted by: dancerkc
» RE: Veganism is - Yes/No Posted by: gadfly
» RE: Veganism is - Yes/No Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Veganism is - Yes/No Posted by: gadfly
» RE: Veganism is - Yes/No Posted by: ConnecttheDots
Good article but....
Posted by: ladycat on Apr 27, 2006 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Willie failed to mention the USDA mandate backed by big Agribusiness which is seriously threatening the future of small sustainable farms. Go to google or another search engine, type in "stop animal id" and find dozens of links and read all about it, it's scary stuff and it's for real.

Just as small farms are beginning to make a small comeback, this thing will finish them off and we'll all be at the mercy of the big guys for our food supply.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good article but.... Posted by: mariao57
The Omnivore's Dilemma
Posted by: artboy on Apr 27, 2006 12:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I haven't read the new book by Michael Pollan, I heard a great conversation about it on NPR's Science Friday a couple of weeks ago. It seems germane to this conversation, so I thought I'd share.

Here's the link to the page where you can download an mp3 of the program or listen to a stream.

It's far broader than the above discussion on local farming, but does cover some of the same issues. More, it's a discussion on the impact of industrialized food from energy policy to health concerns. At least that's what I got from it.

Enjoy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Local farmers...
Posted by: AvalonSeeker on Apr 27, 2006 12:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I made it a point last summer to travel less than 10 miles to purchase veges and fruit from local Amish farms. There I was, naievely thinking all the produce there was "home-grown", organic and good for me. Upon arriving a little earlier than usual at one of my fav. stands, I was greeted by a delivery truck, where melons and other fruit were being delivered to the farm, from a nearby grower but not one who practices organic farming. I felt very disillusioned to say the least. There were no signs or any indication that the trucked in produce was just that. The Amish girls working there indicated they had no clue what I was talking about when asked. So, even at the markets, or places where organic should rule, I'll be asking questions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Local farmers... Posted by: gadfly
Can it support 6 billion people?
Posted by: nickptar on Apr 27, 2006 1:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just curious. I'm all in favor of more sustainable, environmentally-friendly, democratic agriculture, but it has a long way to go to become the main source of food.

And please don't give me any die-off nonsense. It doesn't have to happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Huh? Posted by: ABetterFuture
Buy locally
Posted by: Snott on Apr 27, 2006 1:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many of us who are trying to support Good Food and healthy environment have taken up the banner of shopping locally and eating in-season produce. Both are instrumental to the cause Willie espouses.

If you buy out-of-season produce, look at those little tags on the produce. In my state, they usually have the source of the produce. Now, I'm not recommending a boycott or anything like that, but one of the effects of the "free trade agreements" has been to jeopardize farmers here in the US who are having a hard time competing because labor in competitors' countries is so much cheaper. Additionally, in some of those countries, to avoid the cost of providing rich soil, even villages just cut further into the jungles to expand their fields. And when (if) the soil becomes unproductive by overfarming (because many farmers have not been taught "orgainic" cultivation), it is often taken over by big-agriculture. I invite people to ONLY purchase organic produce that is imported if they want to buy produce out-of-season if it's not available locally. If buying locally isn't practical, always look for "Equal Exchange" logos.

Chocolate and Coffee are two places where you can start. I haven't seen Equal Exchange Bananas yet, maybe we need to work on that - but maybe it's not feasible. I know you have to pay a little more, but cut down your consumption and support family farms world-wide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ABSOLUTELY! PUT FAMILY FARMS AHEAD OF PROGRESSIVE TAXATION, UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE, & MORE TIME OFF
Posted by: cry0fan on Apr 27, 2006 3:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cannot figure out why the progressive agenda does not catch on with the majority of Americans. I mean, after all, we have our priorties so well placed. Americans really don't care about shifting the tax burden back to the rich, like the Europeans, or getting universal healthcare, like the Europeans, or getting 6 weeks vacation a year, like the Europeans, or getting low cost unversities, like the Europeans, or controlling illegal immigration, like the Europeans, so that the labor supply is not flooded, so that workers' wages are not depressed by a flooded labor supply from the 3rd world.

No, indeed, Americans want a progressive agenda that touches their lives. THey want a progressive agenda that focuses on family farms, on political machinations like impeaching Bush (they just LOVE all those photoshops of Bush that make him look like an emperor!). They want a progressive agenda that focuses on race and gender politics (they are DEEPLY concerned about rights for asexuals!). They want a progressive agenda that focuses on the environment (they really like the environmental focus on stopping development of cities because of endangered species. They really don't care about the disasterous effects on the environment of cramming so many people into America through mass immigration. They never notice that the environmental strategy of hampering development and supporting mass immigration just drives up property prices. Well, maybe they don't notice that because the progressive "movement" fails to point that out).

The progressive agenda as shaped by writers and media outlets like Alternet and its nonprofit foundation sponsors, is exactly what America is crying out for!!!!!!!

from alternet's ABOUT page:

AlterNet.org is a project of the Independent Media Institute. 2005-2006 Foundation supporters include:
Arca Foundation
Bioneers Foundation
Bloome Foundation
Branscomb Family Foundation
Cloud Mountain Foundation
Shari & Richard Foos
Funding Exchange (Donor Advised)
Glaser Progress Foundation
McKay Foundation
Nathan Cummings Foundation
Open Society Institute
Park Foundation
RSF Global Community Fund (Donor Advised)
Schumann Center for Media and Democracy
Threshold Foundation
Town Creek Foundation
Wallace Global Fund
Working Assets Grantmaking Fund of the Tides Foundation

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HYDROPONICS ONLY AS PLAN B
Posted by: nitsua1023 on Apr 27, 2006 4:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
99.% of plants don't take to hydroponics.

Also, most people grow hydroponically in rockwool, which is fiberglass. It is not bio-degradable. When it dries it can harm the lungs of anyone near it. Not to mention, a WHOLE FARM where everything is grown in rockwool would be just completely insane.

If you must grow hydroponically, (usually the only reason is that certain plants must be kept indoors), but if you must: use coconut-fiber grow cubes. They are natural and bio-degradable.

Even for certain illegal plants, hydroponics is all the rage. But those illegal plants tend to be grown indoors by non-experts. But not for farmers and botanical experts who actually know a thing or two about soil and planting mediums. Your reefer will taste better grown in soil anyway.

Plants have grown in soil for about a 250 million years. They like it. Gardeners and farmers get best results when they attempt to mimic nature. Not when they fight against it.

I'm a genetics student in my senior year, my expertise is in plants.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HYDROPONICS ONLY AS PLAN B Posted by: nickptar
» Or not. Posted by: RoffleTheWaffle
Land and organics
Posted by: greentime on Apr 27, 2006 4:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article Willie - nice to see you on Alternet.

Who owns the land is as important as how it is used. Agribusiness that puts a monopoly on land is not healthy for any life. Organic food grown on small scale farms by people who care for the earth wisely is the healthiest. The classic "small garden, well-tilled" comes to mind. It also provides more living wages for more people and creates a sustainable economy.

If more people own land and create a sustainable ecosytem for, a sustainable economy will follow. Monopolism is the opposite of competition. Land monopolism is what has been the ruin of a planet well shared and appreciated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Land and organics Posted by: Johnny Hempseed
Plants in soil, animals raised humanely
Posted by: Gregor on Apr 27, 2006 7:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would love to see small farmers get back. At least things were done traditionally. Let's face it, where do plants get their nutrients that make you healthy? From the soil, the rain, the sun. And mass producing fruits and vegetables and picking them before they are ripe is robbing everyone of their nutrients. They need to sit on the vine to get the proper amount of nutrients. These nutrients make your body stronger. there is a reason we say germs are getting stronger, its because we are weakening our own chemical systems.

Mass produced farming started not necessarily to squeeze out the little guy, it just was never really profitable to farm. For something as vital as agriculture, the little guy was getting financially squeezed out. Acres and acres of land were sold to developers, and items could be gotten overseas for half the cost. The little guy was squeezed right out. As usual business is forever oppurtunistic and jumped right into the gap.

Really, bringing back the little guy would be great, but in order to support that in this failed system of ours we would have to change systems and the way we do business dramatically.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Supermarket
Posted by: Maryanne on Apr 27, 2006 7:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The supermarket in our area- Wegmans by name- buys local during harvest. The name and location of the farm from which a certain product comes is prominently displayed above the item. They seem committed to buying local wherever possible and when this is not possible, seem to seek out growers that produce the type of product they want to sell.

In the summer months there are farmer's markets in various locations in the city and nearby suburbs. However, one can see the decline of the family farm since this is no longer a daily affair, but limited to weekends. Moreover some of these who once were farmers now are hucksters. And many small farms are up for sale to developers since the cost of taxes on the land exceeds what can be earned. And as noted above, as the older generation retires, the younger ones choose other less difficult fields of work (no pun intended.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sustainable agriculture
Posted by: willymack on Apr 27, 2006 7:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Want to know how to develop a nature-friendly agricultural food producing machine? Look no further than the RIGVEDA, a priceless body of information from India. Don't know what that is? Then, get off your lazy ass and FIND OUT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sustainable agriculture Posted by: nickptar
» RE: Sustainable agriculture Posted by: gadfly
Find your local farmers market
Posted by: dahliaqueen on Apr 29, 2006 5:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.ams.usda.gov/farmersmarkets/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another link to farmer's markets
Posted by: dahliaqueen on Apr 29, 2006 5:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.organicconsumers.org/purelink.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Willies Blues
Posted by: J Petersmith on Apr 29, 2006 3:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, this article to me didn't sound like Willie. At least not as one might expect from his songs and interviews. I guess it may have been ghost written.........not that there's anything wrong with that.

Secondly, I was confused as to how the concept of "family farm" as opposed to "factory farm" was used. If 2,000 chickens are being raised in an enclosed chicken house, even though the owner/operator is a completely independent farmer and has no partnership with industrial agri-business.........is that a factory farm? Or is it, as I believe, a family farm?

If a pen of cattle in a feed lot is owned by an individual rancher who is maintaining ownership of his home grown yearling cattle through the finishing period..........is that factory farming? Or is it, as I believe, family farming.

If organic produce found at Whole Foods is grown on a huge, corporate owned acreage and then shipped out to markets 1500 miles away, using varieties of vegetables selected for their shipability and shelf life......is this family farming. Or is it, as I believe, factory farming.

Much of the difference in taste, and possibly in nutrients in produce shipped long distances is not due to the shipping but to the "toughness" of produce varieties required by the produce companies. Even if the produce is truly locally grown, if these "tough" varieties are what is grown, it will be fresher, but not necessarily of greater quality...........JP

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

2 Questions: How much can you grow? And what does it cost?
Posted by: Artaraxl on Apr 29, 2006 8:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I sympathize with the Good Food movement. But as a lifelong New York City resident, I have questions/concerns not addressed by this piece or subsequent comments.

E.g. Although I've read some comments to the contrary, it has always been my experience that organic produce is significantly more expensive to buy. Plus, if the demand increased dramatically, wouldn't it become even more expensive? Presumably the supply is limited, essentially, by definition ("small family farms").

In any urban area, growing one's own food (even if one had the expertise and inclination) is unfeasible.

How can the organic suppliers local to New York possibly produce the food to feed 8 million people, especially low income residents who live off of Campbell's soup and tuna fish? As it is, the quality of produce at supermarkets in low income neighborhoods is horribly low. Without the purchasing power to demand even good quality "mainstream" (what's the right word? non-organic? aribusiness grown?) produce, talk of organic food seems to me to be putting the proverbial cart before the horse.

Then, of course, there's the fact that agriculture is one of (if not the) largest U.S. export. There are major foreign policy issues inextricably (Willie's word or not!) linked to this one.

Maybe there are solutions waiting the wings, but at the moment it's hard to regard Good Food (in caps) as more than a luxury.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What About Hemp, Willie?
Posted by: Againstthewindwalking on Apr 30, 2006 3:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about hemp? What about a fiber crop that takes less the 3% of the chemicals to grow that cotton does? What about an oil source for bio-diesel that takes 5% of the chemicals that it does to grow corn? What about a crop that produces food, fuel fiber, biomass, paper, and can be grown every where from Texas to Alaska!

Oh that's right! Monsanto and the Big Agribusiness doesn't want crops that require little if any chemical assistance to grow! I hate to say this, but if you're against hemp, you're against family farms! Here is a crop that will grow damn near anywhere! Yet this country's puritanical thinking that denies the sick and dying medicine, and locks up our people for smoking a green weed, has taken it off the table to suit the intrests of big business!

What I want to know is when the family farmer is going to wake the fuck up??!! When is the family farmer going to realize that there is a crop that can save the family farm! You don't have to spend $10.000.00 in chemicals to grow a $15.000.00 crop! Monsanto and the DEA are lying to you! Get a clue!

Oh! By the way! I live in a little town in North Carolina. I've seen family farms fall to the gavel and turned into subdivisions one, by, one, by, one!

As long as you buy the Republican lie, you're slitting your own throats! I'm sorry! The truth hurts! But it hurts a damn sight less than watching your land, that's been in your family for generations turned into a strip mall, because you bought into a line of shit!

Oh yea! I may not get into your music much, Willie. I was born a rocker, and I'll die one! But I damn sure believe in what you're trying to do!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hear ye...
Posted by: HeidiLockwood on May 3, 2006 11:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Willie Nelson for President!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Local Food For the Future
Posted by: hamesfarmer on May 10, 2006 4:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are plenty of ways for people to get local food, growing it themselves is just one way. I agree that "boutique food," does the world a disservice, but farmers need to make money in order to survive. But there are lots of community gardens and farms that make it possible to grow food for people who don't drive SUV's and BMW's. The more open land we save, the more possibilities there are for local agriculture.
American small farms are about to be taxed into oblivion with attacks on our privacy, fees for having animals that feed us, and paperwork beyond belief. This isn't a farmer's issue and we need people like Willie to make it a National issue. People need to know that the NAIS is being implemented in all manner of ways, not all of them proper. Food is a political statement and supporting small farmers tells agribusiness what you think of their practices and philosophy.
Willie, use your celebrity and your connections, please, to bring this issue to the forefront or we're looking at world where 4H and "kids ponies" are only a dream. I believe we are suffering from so many of our cultural woes because people know longer learn compassion and patience, cause and effect that comes from living with farming.
Even the UN defines "success" in a nation as how many "non-agricultural" businesses exist. They define 3rd world in part by the way farming is done, and consider agriculturally based nations to be poor. A country that can grow its own food is safer from invasion than one that must import everything. A person that can feed his family and the neighbors is one that understands compassion and cooperation. Aren't those the foundations for peace?
Please, express your opinions about NAIS with the USDA, and spread the word by reading nonais.org, or stopanimalid.or or joining in the work of libertyark.org.
Thank you Willie, for your music and your voice!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]