ENVIRONMENT  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 38

Celebrating Our Eco-Heroes

We asked our readers to name the people making a difference in their communities, working for people and the planet at the grassroots. Here are your heroes.
April 22, 2006  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 
When Vanity Fair announced its special "green issue," focusing on the environment and those who fight on its behalf, it seemed a watershed moment, a sign that talk of global warming has officially broken into the mainstream. With ample scientific evidence that clearly shows the negative impact human beings are having on the planet, it's long past time we started asking how we can stop it, rather than naively pondering whether it's going on at all. This Earth Day, we can all celebrate this shift in focus -- and the people who have fueled it.

But the magazine focused almost exclusively on the rich and powerful figureheads of the enviro movement, leaders like Al Gore, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Julia Roberts. In doing so, Vanity Fair missed the very people who offer the most hope in solving the problems we're facing: the grassroots activists and leaders that push environmentalism ever forward.

When we asked readers to nominate their grassroots eco-heroes, we received hundreds of names. It's a testament to the number of people, often uncelebrated, who continue to fight for our planet. It is one thing to champion a cause, another to live it. And while Julia Roberts and George Clooney look great in green on the Vanity Fair cover, these nine eco-heroes are responsible for making our entire planet look better and greener.

Rebecca Aldworth, Humane Society
aldworth_rebecca
Rebecca Aldworth (Credit: HSUS/Brian Skerry)
Rebecca Aldworth is director of Canadian Wildlife Issues for the Humane Society of the United States. For the past ten years, she has campaigned to stop the commercial seal hunt in Canada. Every year, she serves as a witness to the hunt, bringing journalists, parliamentarians and scientists to observe the savage competition, which routinely involves skinning the animals alive. Aldworth's tireless efforts to bring the slaughter of seals into the public eye have paid off. This year, Greenland stopped its trade in Canadian sealskins -- no small feat considering that over the past two years it has been the recipient of some 90,000 skins. Aldworth is devoted to finding constructive solutions to end sealing by working to create compensation programs to dissuade fishermen from the practice. In addition to Greenland, Mexico, Belgium, Croatia and Luxembourg have all recently taken steps to ban their trade in seal products.

These steps are critical to ending a practice that many aren't even aware is still going on. As Aldworth explained, back in the 1970s and 80s when this campaign was at its height globally, the seals became the symbol of the animal protection and environmental movements. In the 1980s, when the EU banned the import of newborn seal skins, the victory "turned us from protesters into the politically powerful. We changed from a movement that stood in the streets and didn't really effect policy to one that convinced governments around the world to take action." But in the 1990s, Canada's federal government subsidized the return of the hunt. Despite the setback, Aldworth is optimistic about the future, noting that she believes this may be the last year we have to see the slaughter of baby seals in Canada. "This is a victory we simply have to win," she notes, "and I think we will win it."

Janine Blaeloch, Western Lands Project
Janine Blaeloch
Janine Blaeloch
On paper, a land trade where the government takes in 33,000 acres for public use in exchange for just 7,200 acres of national forest seems like a win-win, right? Not if the company that's offering up the land is paper giant Weyerhauser. According to Janine Blaeloch, the founder and director of the Western Lands Project, the deal would have given up thousands of acres of native forests in exchange for "rocks and stumps." This proposed deal spurred the creation of the Western Lands Project, a Seattle-based nonprofit whose aim is simple: to keep public lands public.

Blaeloch says that, in addition to preserving public lands by keeping them out of the hands of developers and companies like Weyerhauser, the WLP's work helps to raise public awareness of the kind of backroom deals that happen between the federal government and corporations. It's the kind of work that's all the more important now, when the federal officials who are responsible for safeguarding public lands have recently worked for the same industries they're supposed to be supervising.

In the ten years since Western Lands took on Weyerhauser -- and won a major victory in 1999, preventing the transfer -- Blaeloch says she's been consistently impressed at just how much the public cares about the land. "All these public lands are something the U.S. has that no one else in the world has. It's also the one elemental thing that we all share, that we all have in common." And that's something everyone agrees is worth fighting for.

Vivian Chang, Asian Pacific Environmental Network
Vivian Chang
Vivian Chang
As executive director of Oakland, Calif.'s Asian Pacific Environmental Network, Vivian Chang wears many hats. As it notes on its website, APEN believes "the environment includes everything around us: where we live, work and play."

Chang -- like APEN itself -- works on grassroots levels to build leadership and solidarity within underprivileged communities, and direct organizing is where her group's heart lies. APEN's much-respected Bay Area projects include the five-year-old Laotian Organizing Project (LOP) in Richmond, which is also home to the 11-year-old Asian Youth Advocates program for young women (focusing on environmental and reproductive health and justice, community activism and cultural identity); and the four-year-old Power in Asians Organizing (PAO) which works with a pan-Asian immigrant community in Oakland.

As Chang and APEN's development director, Manami Kano, concisely summarized in a piece for Grist Magazine, "We all know things are terribly wrong, that the frameworks of liberalism and environmentalism have failed, and that no social movement -- environmental, labor, racial justice, women, LGBT -- is being spared from the right's consolidation of power."

Sadly, yes -- AlterNet knows "things are terribly wrong." This is what makes Chang, and her work with APEN, all the more inspiring -- for the brave, important work she has dedicated her life to.

Theo Colburn, Our Stolen Future
Theo Colborn
Theo Colborn
Genital malformations. Declining sperm counts. Breasts on toddlers. According to Theo Colborn, these increasingly common phenomenons are our fault. Dr. Colborn is the pioneer-scientist on studies supporting the "Endocrine Disruptor Hypothesis," a theory that synthetic chemicals, created and released into the environment by humans, are mimicking hormones in our bodies and essentially "neutering the population."

Concern for water quality drove Colborn back to college at the age of 51. She received a doctorate in zoology at the age of 58 and went on to co-author Our Stolen Future. The book, a synthesis of her findings supporting the Endocrine Disruptor Hypothesis, created quite a stir in the scientific community, and there were efforts to censor the studies featured in it. It was precisely this kind of censorship that encouraged her to keep pushing to get the truth out. She believes the only way to continue working toward a more environmentally sustainable future is for people with courage to continue pushing independent media coverage and educating the public.

These days, Colborn can be found in Colorado fundraising for her nonprofit organization The Endocrine Disruptor Exchange (TEDX) and driving around the mountains in her Prius looking for new spots to go birding.

Juliet Ellis, Urban Habitat
Juliet Ellis
Juliet Ellis
If environmentalists are ever going to make progress, environmental and social advocates must cooperate with government officials and business leaders to change the way our society operates. Juliet Ellis, the executive director of Urban Habitat, an Oakland based nonprofit is working to do just that. Ellis and her associates at Urban Habitat approach the complex mission of creating an environmentally just society through policy and advocacy, research and education, and by building multi-interest coalitions to hold politicians and businesses responsible for their actions. So far, their work has "helped to broaden and frame the agenda on toxic pollution, transportation, tax and fiscal reform, and the nexus between inner-city disinvestments and urban sprawl."

Ellis earned her M.B.A. with an emphasis in environmental and urban studies from San Francisco State University. Before becoming the director of Urban Habitat, she worked as a program officer for Neighborhood and Community Development at the San Francisco Foundation. She currently serves on the board and steering committee of the Bay Area Transportation and Land Use Coalition, the Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Communities, the Capital Community Investment Initiative, Girls After School Academy, Ella Baker Center for Human Rights and the Partnership for Working Families.

Cynthia Pryor, Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve
Cynthia Pryor
Cynthia Pryor
In her work as executive director of the tiny 501(c)3 Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve, Cynthia Pryor of Big Bay, Mich., works -- tirelessly and solo -- to protect the pristine wilderness, streams and ground water in Michigan's largely unpowered, unpaved Yellow Dog Plains.

Pryor founded YDWP in 1995, and as its only employee, she's had her work cut out for her. Things began heating up in 2002, when mining company Kennecott Mineral Explorations discovered a small mineral deposit of nickel and copper on the plains. The company wanted to develop harmful underground sulfide mining there, potentially damaging both the Salmon-Trout River (which provides spawning and nursery ground for a rare native breed of Michigan trout) and the Yellow Dog River, which supports many rare species from the moose and the wolf to the peregrine falcon.

"Since Kennecott announced its plans, we've been aggressively opposing sulfide mining in Michigan. We've developed a statute, rules, and have been getting the whole community involved. It's just not good for the town -- such a water-rich place -- and it's not good for Michigan," Pryor tells AlterNet.

And her small Big Bay community (population: 250) tends to agree. Pryor has recruited a "broad coalition of folks opposed to sulfide mining," and most locals have aligned with her to fight the proposed mining.

"Kennecott has not been successful yet," Pryor notes, with a tinge of disdain for the "arrogance" displayed by this large corporation (Kennecott is part of the second-largest mining company in the world). "They thought they could come in and do whatever they wanted," she says. "They thought they would just come to our little remote location, and that no one was going to oppose it."

But, clearly, with eco-warriors like Pryor in their midst, Kennecott was dead wrong when it decided to mess with Yellow Dog.

Michael Reynolds, Earthship Biotechture
Michael Reynolds
Michael Reynolds (Credit: Cer!se.)
Back in the '70s, Michael Reynolds took watching the news to a new level. Having seen a report on the growing number of beer cans thrown over streets and highways immediately after watching a report on a growing shortage of timber, Reynolds began incorporating beer cans in the building materials he used in home construction. Over the next 30 years, Reynolds synthesized this common sense approach, using unconventional materials and sustainable technologies, to create his company -- Earthship Biotecture. Using solar and thermal heating and cooling, wind electricity, water harvesting, and contained sewage treatment, Reynolds has developed off-the-grid housing that is both environmentally and economically viable.

Based in New Mexico, the growing interest in Biotecture has led to the creation of three communities in Taos. Reynolds' vision, however, is distinctly global. Reynolds leads disaster relief crews, focusing on providing immediate housing that can be efficiently integrated into long-term sustainable housing, with the underlying focus on transferring the knowledge to local groups and citizens. It's an ambitious goal, but it has already seen successes in such varied places as India, Spain, Bolivia, Honduras and Belgium. Reynolds has dedicated his life to his ideals, emphasizing the simplicity and necessity of sustainable living. As his website states,
The condition of our planet tells us we must now begin to take responsibility for what happens beyond the reach of our fingertips. There is no mystery involved in Earthship electricity. There is no unknown source of water. There is no magical black hole that sucks up all our sewage. Instead, we work in harmony with the earth to deal with these issues -- taking what it has to give us directly and giving back what it wants to receive. With this harmony ringing in our minds we evolve the Earthship Systems.
Neil Turner, Citizens Advocating Responsible Development
Neil Turner
Neil Turner
As president of Citizens Advocating Responsible Development, Neil Turner fought the construction of a proposed 520-megawatt gas-fired electric power plant in the Glenville Industrial Park (GEP) near Schenectady, N.Y., starting in 1999. With wealthy, powerful backers like General Electric and Duke energy, and bought-off, rubber-stamping politicians ushering its progress, the project appeared a done deal. But after constant pressure from Turner and a careful tactical approach, years of fighting paid off.

The original project plans by plant developers had the GEP buying water from the city of Schenectady and using the nearby village of Scotia's sewer system for waste water disposal. With pressure from Turner, Schenectady's City Council eventually opted against selling the GEP water, and the town government of Scotia voted to deny use of the sewer system. Both Duke Energy and General Electric eventually pulled out of the project, putting the developer's dreams on ice. By the end of 2003, the power park was doomed, and the project's offices were closed.

When he was told that AlterNet readers had voted him as an environmental hero, Turner responded, "I almost hate to classify this myself as environmentalist. What it takes is persistence. When we embarked on the campaign to stop the power plant in Scotia, everyone told us, 'Oh it's a done deal.' But we kept going for five years and pushed them back. We stopped the power plant on technicalities, cutting off their source of water and stopping their sewage. This wasn't heroics; this was persistence."

Dr. Rosalie Bertell, Grey Nuns of the Sacred Heart
Rosalie Bertell
Rosalie Bertell
In the mid-1980s, two catastrophes rocked the world in quick succession: the 1984 Union Carbide explosion in Bhopal, India, which killed more than 15,000 people and sickened as many as 600,000; and the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear reactor meltdown that sickened and killed thousands, and graphically revealed the dangers of nuclear power. Both of these disasters continue to wreak havoc on people in the affected areas.

Dr. Rosalie Bertell, a mathematician, a nun in the order of the Grey Nuns of the Sacred Heart, and renowned human rights activist, helped raise awareness of not only the immediate destruction caused by these tragedies, but their ongoing effects. To this day, thousands of people in Russia and India are suffering from their exposure to these accidents.

But this was neither the beginning nor the end of Bertell's work. She has devoted her life to documenting and fighting the threats posed to human health and the planet by nuclear power, rampant militarism and unchecked corporate pollution. Bertell is an outspoken opponent to the use of depleted uranium and successfully fought for the first moratorium on a nuclear power plant in upstate New York.

Bertell founded the International Institute of Concern for Public Health in 1984 and has authored several books about the threats to the planet, most recently 2001's Planet Earth: The Newest Weapon of War. But as a 2005 biography of Bertell puts it, she is a scientist, eco-feminist and visionary. A 1998 profile in the Toronto Star says Bertell "believes that if women had more decision-making power, the world would be a better place. If all women were like her, that seems a safe bet.

Diane Wilson, Code Pink
Diane Wilson
Diane Wilson
Diane Wilson is a fourth-generation shrimper from the Texas Gulf Coast. After reading a newspaper article in 1989 listing her native Calhoun County as the biggest polluter in the country, she decided to do something about it. Despite facing contempt from many of her neighbors and threats from polluting interests, Wilson forced the toxic practices of companies like Formosa Plastics into the public spotlight by going on a hunger strike and constant campaigning toward her local legislature. Last April, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality fined Formosa $150,000 for violations of air pollution laws, including releases of toxic chemicals like vinyl chloride.

Sixteen years of hard campaigning for public health and the environment from her hometown, Seadrift, Texas, has netted Wilson a pile of awards, including: National Fisherman Magazine Award, Mother Jones 'Hell Raiser of the Month, Louis Gibbs' Environmental Lifetime Award, Louisiana Environmental Action (LEAN) Environmental Award.

Wilson is a co-founder of Code Pink and continues to lead the fight for social justice. Wilson recently wrote a book about her encounters with corporate polluters and Texas Politicos, "An Unreasonable Woman." Upon being told that AlterNet readers had voted for her as an environmental hero, Wilson responded, "I can't believe it. Pretty amazing. I don't quite know what to say. AlterNet is always a place where I get my news -- I'm honored."
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email


Comments are closed-

Hair shirtism won't work
Posted by: Bobsays on Apr 22, 2006 3:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no problem with anybody living however they want. I have a great deal of respect for people who get back to nature and live a rustic, self-sufficient life. The only problem is that mos tof us can't do this: the world is over populated.

So, the only solution that will work, won't be hair shirtism (nobody will go for it, just look at China) and instead it needs to be engineering for a new future. This means taking everything - from cars to appliances to clothng to computers, neighbourhoods - and instead build them to fit with the environment and use as little energy as possible.

I have seen this work many times. All my appliances are energy efficient - and hey it's cheaper. I still have nice clean clothes.

I would have take difference with some of the green heroes. Canada, for one, is not a green hero. The country produces more greenhouse gases per capita than the US. All its major cities have become severely polluted in the 1990s. Acid rain has destroyed many lakes. Canadians live in some of the biggest and most energy gobbling houses in the world. They also drive all the time in cars. They are worst example of suburban waste. Europeans and asians are far better examples. Both are better resouces use because resources are expensive - they have no choice.

As for green activists, I have known many over the years. These guys and gals are the worst hypocrites. They all jet around the world constantly, going to this social forum or that UN conference. They are not a good roll model. I have also seen the consequences of their projects in the developing world: they don't work.

The only people who have made any difference out there is the animal conservationists. Animal conservation is easily quantifiable and so they have been able to stem the slaughter.

But greenie activists in the past twenty years have at best created a very nice situation for themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hair shirtism won't work Posted by: montims
» Please stop bashing Canada Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Hair shirtism won't work Posted by: jackburns
» RE: Stereotyping won't work either Posted by: didjeri_voodoo

Comments are closed-

Links to the hundreds
Posted by: bebop on Apr 22, 2006 5:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The nine profiled all seem great. Like 'em. Love 'em. But know what? I'm still curious about the list of hundreds of nominees. The ones not so flashy, the ones who do the day to day work in small ways, and the ones that we can most relate to.

How about it? Could you link to a page with all of the nominees and the descriptions from the nominators?

merci beaucoup....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

mzanony@yahoo.com
Posted by: miz on Apr 22, 2006 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Absolutely ASTOUNDING! Movie stars at the top of the list? We are abysmally NOT PAYING ATTENTION AS CITIZENS! What about Ralph Nader? Does America's collective memory only go back 20 years at most with regards to just about everything? This man SHOULD HAVE BEEN PRESIDENT IN THE LAST ELECTION let alone at the top of your "contest list for eco-heroes." His TV air time was limited to 4 a.m. ONLY! He had a web site TELLING AMERICA EXACTLY WHAT HIS INTENTIONS WERE should he be elected. Yet America chose only to whine about a debate between a babboon, Bushbaby, and Kerry. Did either of them give Americans a CLUE as to what their intentions were? The goddamn press IGNORED HIM COMPLETELY. Everyone ASSumed Nader would know nothing about politics, diplomacy or how to be Commander-in-Chief of the military. As it turns out, AMERICANS were ASSES for ASSuming so. We SPIRITUALLY BRUTALIZED a true American son! Right now, having read your readers poll, am also disgusted with the intelligent half of America as well and not "just" the astoundlingly ignorant, fascist RABID RIGHT. I WILL NEVER FORGIVE MY FELLOW AMERICANS FOR THE SHABBY DISREGARD FOR A CONSUMMATE AMERICAN HERO. SHAME ON US, AMERICA! SHAME ON US ALL!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

rather eurocentric
Posted by: negrita7 on Apr 22, 2006 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this list is: What about Vandana Shiva? Arundhati Roy? The Zapatistas? The environmental activists of the Niger Delta?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: rather eurocentric Posted by: justgreenleaf
» RE: rather eurocentric Posted by: mandiwrite

Comments are closed-

Local Eco Ed Heroes
Posted by: gowildnyc on Apr 22, 2006 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amen.

I want to put in a plug for the eco heroes who are battling our national eco illiteracy and science deficit in the classroom. A group I work with did a newsletter for National Environmental Education Week featuring a handful of the hundreds who are on the front lines every week in under-resourced NYC schools - free download at Go Wild NYC.

Any other cities working to boost the people who are duking it out on kids' behalf? Would be nice to have a national network . . .

Jessica Marshall
jessica@eyecandybooks.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Local Eco Ed Heroes Posted by: catfish

Comments are closed-

there are heros, there are no heros
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 22, 2006 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is rather telling that the above individuals, who all seem to be nice folks, are viewed as heros - something out of the ordinary run of human behavior. Yet their actions are those of sane intelligent people who encounter various problems and respond to the best of their abilities.

If this is to be viewed as exceptional human behavior then we have a real problem. What constitutes normal human behavior?

Let's consider two issues (and corporate viewpoints) that involve some of our heros: forestry (natural resource extraction) and agribusiness (a huge petrochemical market in herbicides, pesticides and fuels, and an area of active intellectual property struggle involving gene patenting).

Sustaining healthy diverse ecosystems should be the primary consideration for a healthy society that plans to be around for some time (this would be a 'conservative' value, certainly). Absorbing carbon dioxide and producing oxygen is one example; this is a service that the Amazon rainforest plays a large role in. Wild plants often contain insect-resistance genes that can be rebred into agricultural strains (corn varieties are a good example of this). There are many other critical reasons to maintain such 'ecosystem services'.

According to 'rational economic theory' such considerations have no place in forestry and agribusiness corporate strategy. CEOs and Directors are looking at profit margins on a quarterly basis, and not much else. There is a lack of built-in long-term thinking, and no reward for it either. This is what economics schools call normal - short-sighted greed with disastrous long-term consequences. One small step away from this view would be to tie investors tightly to their investments - and eventually introduce the notion that the planet is our investment - our only real future.

Try building a life-support system on the Moon or on Mars and you'll quickly realize the value of 'ecosystem services'. Until we can think of our heros as normal people, we are in for continuing serious problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

PseudoLeft molded into race/gender/enviro-green, but away from populist economics issues
Posted by: cry0fan on Apr 22, 2006 8:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the plutocrats and megacorporations pay good money to generate propaganda that is used to shape and mold the core planks of a PseudoLeft, a false left that is focused on race and gender identity politics, focused on horserace GOP-vs-Dem politics, focused on environmental issues, etc.

The last thing the plutocrats and megacorporations wants is a TRUE Left, one that is focused on populist economics issues that unite the lower 70% of Americans. THat TRUE Left would be focused on progressive taxation, universal healthcare, cutting immigration (legal and illegal) so as to improve the labor-supply vs labor-demand ratio, and other concerns, such as building nuclear power plants for cheaper energy. Also, low cost college, low cost childcare.

In other words, all the things that western europeans have and we do not have.

THAT is populist economics. THat is the TRUE Left. What we have here on Alternet and other pseudoleft outlets is a platform that is what the rich and the megacorporations (the overclass) want as a Left, a left that is tame. THe Overclass created this left for you.

The overclass does this primarily by funding nonprofit foundations that create propaganda. Read Joan Roelofs's book THE MASK OF PLURALITY. THere are many detailed reviews on that book online.

If you want to make this country more like Europe, you have to engage in an information war. Electoral politics is not true politics. That is just the aftermath of true politics. Real politics is takes place through cultural indoctrination and subtle propaganda.

if you want to make America more like Europe, you have to put ideas and scripts into people's heads. This is done by sounds and images and words. But it has nothing to do with GOP vs Dems.

You have to communicate ideas about the differences between Western Europe and America with respect to progressive taxation and healthcare and the welfare state and education and the military. YOu have to paint a picture of history that puts this all in context with a leftist populist slant.

Do you see alternet or mother jones or The Nation doing this? Very little. Mostly you have race and gender politics or horse race politics or enviro-politics.
Do you understand why, now?

If you want to make a change, you have to focus on ideology transmission. And all you have to do is concentrate on Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida Voters. If you would organize to create good subtle propaganda directed towards these voters, the presidential candidates would have to slant their campaigns towards the ideologies that you disseminated. It is all about the sheer volume and quality of ideological scripts that are being propagated.

But the left is not even in the game. THe GOP is all over the place with their propaganda aimed at the largest single voting blocs--white males, blue collar whites, rural whites. And the PseudoLeft is all over the place with their nonprofit foundation funded Pseudo Left propaganda.

Why not organize to create ideological propaganda oriented towards populist leftist economic issues, bread and butter issues, and target these particular voters.

I know why. But I aint say it or I will get banned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

secret ballot?
Posted by: ethanay on Apr 22, 2006 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I tried to enter a candidate and I never even received a confirmation that the entry was successful--to the contrary kept receiving an error telling me that I MUST (in red) include my e-mail address...which I did. Was my entry successful? I don't know.

I find it surprising and incredibly ironic that Alternet kept (during the voting process) and is keeping the list of candidates hidden. In addition, the voting process was implied, but never explicitly explained, meaning that there was NO accountability in who got chosen, why, and by what margins...hmmm...Alternet...already getting lax with democratic principals? And you're not even that powerful yet!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: secret ballot? Posted by: Jan Frel
» RE: secret ballot? Posted by: ethanay

Comments are closed-

Finally, some real leftwing talk
Posted by: Bobsays on Apr 22, 2006 10:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the poster who bursts the bubble of soft left politics. I am going to tell you what the left has become, and then I will tell you what is wrong with that.

The left has degenrated into a neat gimmick to carve a niche in the free market, media-mad economy. Rather than being oppressed (as would be the case in authoritrian countries) soft left thinkers are quickly absorbed into the mainstream and soon become wealthy or at least very comfortable.

A classic example of this would be Naomi Klein. It is all very glib.

The free market economy doesn't mind this sort of left. The free market economy is foremost, thirsty for ideas and gimmicks. Anything will do.If gay black cowboys are a market, somebody will mak gay black cowboy clothing. It is what is great about the free market economy.

But this means that soft left think they are making a difference. They look at their bank accounts, hey see their faces plastered on billboards everywhere, and think wow!, the revolution is just around the corner. But the only revolution going on is when they get the decorators around to switch to the latest neat look from Ikea.

Hard left issues are different. They worry about real things like how many hours in the day, what the pay and conditions are, do you have a job, somewhere to live that is dignified. Soft left worry that Mexican illegal migrants are being given free language lessons and that their children have daycare. They don't address the fact they are depressing wages. This is because it ain't their wages that are going down. Illegals don't get to compete for jobs like newspaper columnist, or best-selling author, or professor, or doctor. Interesting huh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Greenpeace, et al
Posted by: YogiBear on Apr 22, 2006 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to nominate the founders and the members of the high profile extremist groups that have kept environmentalism in the news, and therefore in our social conciousness. The way I figure it, while organizations like Greenpeace kept reminding us of the major changes we need to be working on as a culture, and a (human) race, individuals started to slowly change their ways within those cultrues. How long would it have taken us to get bottle laws and recycling programs into our states? Anyone remember when the grumps in your office claimed that paper recycling would never take on because it wasn't cost effective enough? Sure, vehicle hybridization needed a Republican political push, but the framework for doing so was already in place from the environmental movement.

Environmentalism has been a true grass-roots movement, and one whose participants can be proud of. How many of us chnaged one or more of our behaviors due to a friend or neighbor who was more environmentally concious? I can think of many such people in my own life. Kudos to them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You made a lot of really good points Posted by: doinaheckuvajob
» distinctions Posted by: YogiBear

Comments are closed-

Ordinary People
Posted by: anothername on Apr 22, 2006 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The people named in this article are leaders of organizations and thus, by some degree of definition, public figures and public spokespeople. The person who faithfully recycles and makes purchases to limit having to recycle or toss away is not a public person, cannot be quantified by an Internet search, and may not appreciate having his or her name included in an article. Thus, unlike some of the posters above, I am neither surprised nor perturbed by the people selected. However, I do agree that AlterNet should identify why these people were selected over other nominees.

It is very difficult to be "green" all the time in this country. Try living in an apartment without recycling while city officials receive awards for having a wonderful rcycling program for people living in single-family homes. Try getting a municipally-contracted trash service to collect recycables when the city council is unable to have any authority of the company's actions. Try keeping a smile and an attitude that it is all for the Earth when people who have been polluting for years are given tax breaks or other significant financial incentives to reduce their waste stream production when their neighbors have been doing the right thing for years without any financial incentive or other recognition. Indeed, ridicule is often how people who attempt to modify the consumption culture, in their own lives and in their own surroundings, are frequently greeted.

We need both the life-sized heros who carry their cloth bags with them to have on hand for any occasion just as we need the heros who choose to make a career out of doing bigger deeds to help balance humans and the rest of the planet.

Have a Happy Earth Day - all year long.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ordinary People Posted by: YogiBear

Comments are closed-

My nominee--Cal State Long Beach Associated Students
Posted by: Sojourner on Apr 22, 2006 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They run the nearby recycling center. The funds are used to spread the word about the dangers to our planet. The center is staffed by students (Paid. Sure. For sorting through yucky cans and broken bottles and helping change the results of folks who don't yet know the difference between cardboard and cereal packaging. And hauling off the stuff the jerks leave who think it's a dump. Paid, but not enough.)

It adds up to nothing more than a gesture. But it's been there a whole lot longer than the city's coded trash barrels for sorting. And it led the way to the container tax that keeps our street people in cigarettes, wine, and other assorted condiments.

A drop in the bucket, to be sure. What's that they say about the "long journey"? Oh yeah, it begins with a first step.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The Living Desert
Posted by: Artkansas on Apr 22, 2006 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously, the biggest struggle is to awaken the slumbering SUV crowds out of their torpor to realize how they are connecting with the world out there, a world that few seem to know of or assign much importance. The world beyond work and home.

I'd like to salute all those at The Living Desert in Palm Desert and Indian Wells.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

AF
Posted by: catfish on Apr 22, 2006 1:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jessica,

Check out earthteam.net , and environmental network for teens, teachers, and youth leaders.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I find it strange...
Posted by: mousemanjp on Apr 22, 2006 10:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I submitted Mr. Green as a possible candidate for 'Eco-Heroes'... No vote was held, so the Green Gonzo Group never made it in this article...., however I recommend people enlighten themselves and visit http://www.mrgreen.biz anyways. You might be suprised what kind of situation is really affecting the "Hero" today.

Happy Earth Day, Lets Stop F*cking Her Up!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

While men plan wars, women try to save the planet.
Posted by: mkeeling@jam.rr.com on Apr 22, 2006 10:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only two out of 10 eco-heroes were men. Isn't that something!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Folkmon
Posted by: Folkmon on Apr 23, 2006 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
100 Vanity Faire eco-heroes and all we can come up with or recognize is NINE! Alternet needs to list all the choices from its readers and give those out there putting their bodies and convictions where their mouths are. Some of them may be our neighbors and we'd like to thank them or work with them on a grass roots level. I look forward to seeing more real eco-heroes on your site in the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Folkmon Posted by: Cityzen Jane

Comments are closed-

Some of the other nominees
Posted by: Matthew Wheeland on Apr 24, 2006 12:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for all your comments. Given the short timeline that we executed this project in (5 days from start to finish), it's unavoidable that we missed some important nominees. The nine leaders above are the activists who got the most votes in our survey.

Some of the other notable names are:
Alice Waters, Chez Panisse/Edible Schoolyard; Paul Watson, Sea Shepherd; Vandana Shiva, author and activist; David Suzuki, Suzuki Foundation; Karen Pickett, Bay Area Coalition for Headwaters; Wangari Maathai, Green Belt Movement; Julia Buttefly Hill, Circle of Life; Dr. James Hansen, NASA ; Richard Gienger, Trees Foundation; Suzan Clausen, Surfrider - USA; Lester Brown, Earth Policy Institute; and Judi Bari, Earth First!.

Thanks again to everyone for your participation, and be sure to check out the 2006 Goldman Environmental Prize winners, announced today in San Francisco.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Hair shirtism won't work
Posted by: Bobsays on Apr 22, 2006 3:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no problem with anybody living however they want. I have a great deal of respect for people who get back to nature and live a rustic, self-sufficient life. The only problem is that mos tof us can't do this: the world is over populated.

So, the only solution that will work, won't be hair shirtism (nobody will go for it, just look at China) and instead it needs to be engineering for a new future. This means taking everything - from cars to appliances to clothng to computers, neighbourhoods - and instead build them to fit with the environment and use as little energy as possible.

I have seen this work many times. All my appliances are energy efficient - and hey it's cheaper. I still have nice clean clothes.

I would have take difference with some of the green heroes. Canada, for one, is not a green hero. The country produces more greenhouse gases per capita than the US. All its major cities have become severely polluted in the 1990s. Acid rain has destroyed many lakes. Canadians live in some of the biggest and most energy gobbling houses in the world. They also drive all the time in cars. They are worst example of suburban waste. Europeans and asians are far better examples. Both are better resouces use because resources are expensive - they have no choice.

As for green activists, I have known many over the years. These guys and gals are the worst hypocrites. They all jet around the world constantly, going to this social forum or that UN conference. They are not a good roll model. I have also seen the consequences of their projects in the developing world: they don't work.

The only people who have made any difference out there is the animal conservationists. Animal conservation is easily quantifiable and so they have been able to stem the slaughter.

But greenie activists in the past twenty years have at best created a very nice situation for themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hair shirtism won't work Posted by: montims
» Please stop bashing Canada Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Hair shirtism won't work Posted by: jackburns
» RE: Stereotyping won't work either Posted by: didjeri_voodoo

Comments are closed-

Links to the hundreds
Posted by: bebop on Apr 22, 2006 5:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The nine profiled all seem great. Like 'em. Love 'em. But know what? I'm still curious about the list of hundreds of nominees. The ones not so flashy, the ones who do the day to day work in small ways, and the ones that we can most relate to.

How about it? Could you link to a page with all of the nominees and the descriptions from the nominators?

merci beaucoup....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

mzanony@yahoo.com
Posted by: miz on Apr 22, 2006 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Absolutely ASTOUNDING! Movie stars at the top of the list? We are abysmally NOT PAYING ATTENTION AS CITIZENS! What about Ralph Nader? Does America's collective memory only go back 20 years at most with regards to just about everything? This man SHOULD HAVE BEEN PRESIDENT IN THE LAST ELECTION let alone at the top of your "contest list for eco-heroes." His TV air time was limited to 4 a.m. ONLY! He had a web site TELLING AMERICA EXACTLY WHAT HIS INTENTIONS WERE should he be elected. Yet America chose only to whine about a debate between a babboon, Bushbaby, and Kerry. Did either of them give Americans a CLUE as to what their intentions were? The goddamn press IGNORED HIM COMPLETELY. Everyone ASSumed Nader would know nothing about politics, diplomacy or how to be Commander-in-Chief of the military. As it turns out, AMERICANS were ASSES for ASSuming so. We SPIRITUALLY BRUTALIZED a true American son! Right now, having read your readers poll, am also disgusted with the intelligent half of America as well and not "just" the astoundlingly ignorant, fascist RABID RIGHT. I WILL NEVER FORGIVE MY FELLOW AMERICANS FOR THE SHABBY DISREGARD FOR A CONSUMMATE AMERICAN HERO. SHAME ON US, AMERICA! SHAME ON US ALL!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

rather eurocentric
Posted by: negrita7 on Apr 22, 2006 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this list is: What about Vandana Shiva? Arundhati Roy? The Zapatistas? The environmental activists of the Niger Delta?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: rather eurocentric Posted by: justgreenleaf
» RE: rather eurocentric Posted by: mandiwrite

Comments are closed-

Local Eco Ed Heroes
Posted by: gowildnyc on Apr 22, 2006 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amen.

I want to put in a plug for the eco heroes who are battling our national eco illiteracy and science deficit in the classroom. A group I work with did a newsletter for National Environmental Education Week featuring a handful of the hundreds who are on the front lines every week in under-resourced NYC schools - free download at Go Wild NYC.

Any other cities working to boost the people who are duking it out on kids' behalf? Would be nice to have a national network . . .

Jessica Marshall
jessica@eyecandybooks.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Local Eco Ed Heroes Posted by: catfish

Comments are closed-

there are heros, there are no heros
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 22, 2006 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is rather telling that the above individuals, who all seem to be nice folks, are viewed as heros - something out of the ordinary run of human behavior. Yet their actions are those of sane intelligent people who encounter various problems and respond to the best of their abilities.

If this is to be viewed as exceptional human behavior then we have a real problem. What constitutes normal human behavior?

Let's consider two issues (and corporate viewpoints) that involve some of our heros: forestry (natural resource extraction) and agribusiness (a huge petrochemical market in herbicides, pesticides and fuels, and an area of active intellectual property struggle involving gene patenting).

Sustaining healthy diverse ecosystems should be the primary consideration for a healthy society that plans to be around for some time (this would be a 'conservative' value, certainly). Absorbing carbon dioxide and producing oxygen is one example; this is a service that the Amazon rainforest plays a large role in. Wild plants often contain insect-resistance genes that can be rebred into agricultural strains (corn varieties are a good example of this). There are many other critical reasons to maintain such 'ecosystem services'.

According to 'rational economic theory' such considerations have no place in forestry and agribusiness corporate strategy. CEOs and Directors are looking at profit margins on a quarterly basis, and not much else. There is a lack of built-in long-term thinking, and no reward for it either. This is what economics schools call normal - short-sighted greed with disastrous long-term consequences. One small step away from this view would be to tie investors tightly to their investments - and eventually introduce the notion that the planet is our investment - our only real future.

Try building a life-support system on the Moon or on Mars and you'll quickly realize the value of 'ecosystem services'. Until we can think of our heros as normal people, we are in for continuing serious problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

PseudoLeft molded into race/gender/enviro-green, but away from populist economics issues
Posted by: cry0fan on Apr 22, 2006 8:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the plutocrats and megacorporations pay good money to generate propaganda that is used to shape and mold the core planks of a PseudoLeft, a false left that is focused on race and gender identity politics, focused on horserace GOP-vs-Dem politics, focused on environmental issues, etc.

The last thing the plutocrats and megacorporations wants is a TRUE Left, one that is focused on populist economics issues that unite the lower 70% of Americans. THat TRUE Left would be focused on progressive taxation, universal healthcare, cutting immigration (legal and illegal) so as to improve the labor-supply vs labor-demand ratio, and other concerns, such as building nuclear power plants for cheaper energy. Also, low cost college, low cost childcare.

In other words, all the things that western europeans have and we do not have.

THAT is populist economics. THat is the TRUE Left. What we have here on Alternet and other pseudoleft outlets is a platform that is what the rich and the megacorporations (the overclass) want as a Left, a left that is tame. THe Overclass created this left for you.

The overclass does this primarily by funding nonprofit foundations that create propaganda. Read Joan Roelofs's book THE MASK OF PLURALITY. THere are many detailed reviews on that book online.

If you want to make this country more like Europe, you have to engage in an information war. Electoral politics is not true politics. That is just the aftermath of true politics. Real politics is takes place through cultural indoctrination and subtle propaganda.

if you want to make America more like Europe, you have to put ideas and scripts into people's heads. This is done by sounds and images and words. But it has nothing to do with GOP vs Dems.

You have to communicate ideas about the differences between Western Europe and America with respect to progressive taxation and healthcare and the welfare state and education and the military. YOu have to paint a picture of history that puts this all in context with a leftist populist slant.

Do you see alternet or mother jones or The Nation doing this? Very little. Mostly you have race and gender politics or horse race politics or enviro-politics.
Do you understand why, now?

If you want to make a change, you have to focus on ideology transmission. And all you have to do is concentrate on Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida Voters. If you would organize to create good subtle propaganda directed towards these voters, the presidential candidates would have to slant their campaigns towards the ideologies that you disseminated. It is all about the sheer volume and quality of ideological scripts that are being propagated.

But the left is not even in the game. THe GOP is all over the place with their propaganda aimed at the largest single voting blocs--white males, blue collar whites, rural whites. And the PseudoLeft is all over the place with their nonprofit foundation funded Pseudo Left propaganda.

Why not organize to create ideological propaganda oriented towards populist leftist economic issues, bread and butter issues, and target these particular voters.

I know why. But I aint say it or I will get banned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

secret ballot?
Posted by: ethanay on Apr 22, 2006 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I tried to enter a candidate and I never even received a confirmation that the entry was successful--to the contrary kept receiving an error telling me that I MUST (in red) include my e-mail address...which I did. Was my entry successful? I don't know.

I find it surprising and incredibly ironic that Alternet kept (during the voting process) and is keeping the list of candidates hidden. In addition, the voting process was implied, but never explicitly explained, meaning that there was NO accountability in who got chosen, why, and by what margins...hmmm...Alternet...already getting lax with democratic principals? And you're not even that powerful yet!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: secret ballot? Posted by: Jan Frel
» RE: secret ballot? Posted by: ethanay

Comments are closed-

Finally, some real leftwing talk
Posted by: Bobsays on Apr 22, 2006 10:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the poster who bursts the bubble of soft left politics. I am going to tell you what the left has become, and then I will tell you what is wrong with that.

The left has degenrated into a neat gimmick to carve a niche in the free market, media-mad economy. Rather than being oppressed (as would be the case in authoritrian countries) soft left thinkers are quickly absorbed into the mainstream and soon become wealthy or at least very comfortable.

A classic example of this would be Naomi Klein. It is all very glib.

The free market economy doesn't mind this sort of left. The free market economy is foremost, thirsty for ideas and gimmicks. Anything will do.If gay black cowboys are a market, somebody will mak gay black cowboy clothing. It is what is great about the free market economy.

But this means that soft left think they are making a difference. They look at their bank accounts, hey see their faces plastered on billboards everywhere, and think wow!, the revolution is just around the corner. But the only revolution going on is when they get the decorators around to switch to the latest neat look from Ikea.

Hard left issues are different. They worry about real things like how many hours in the day, what the pay and conditions are, do you have a job, somewhere to live that is dignified. Soft left worry that Mexican illegal migrants are being given free language lessons and that their children have daycare. They don't address the fact they are depressing wages. This is because it ain't their wages that are going down. Illegals don't get to compete for jobs like newspaper columnist, or best-selling author, or professor, or doctor. Interesting huh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Greenpeace, et al
Posted by: YogiBear on Apr 22, 2006 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to nominate the founders and the members of the high profile extremist groups that have kept environmentalism in the news, and therefore in our social conciousness. The way I figure it, while organizations like Greenpeace kept reminding us of the major changes we need to be working on as a culture, and a (human) race, individuals started to slowly change their ways within those cultrues. How long would it have taken us to get bottle laws and recycling programs into our states? Anyone remember when the grumps in your office claimed that paper recycling would never take on because it wasn't cost effective enough? Sure, vehicle hybridization needed a Republican political push, but the framework for doing so was already in place from the environmental movement.

Environmentalism has been a true grass-roots movement, and one whose participants can be proud of. How many of us chnaged one or more of our behaviors due to a friend or neighbor who was more environmentally concious? I can think of many such people in my own life. Kudos to them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You made a lot of really good points Posted by: doinaheckuvajob
» distinctions Posted by: YogiBear

Comments are closed-

Ordinary People
Posted by: anothername on Apr 22, 2006 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The people named in this article are leaders of organizations and thus, by some degree of definition, public figures and public spokespeople. The person who faithfully recycles and makes purchases to limit having to recycle or toss away is not a public person, cannot be quantified by an Internet search, and may not appreciate having his or her name included in an article. Thus, unlike some of the posters above, I am neither surprised nor perturbed by the people selected. However, I do agree that AlterNet should identify why these people were selected over other nominees.

It is very difficult to be "green" all the time in this country. Try living in an apartment without recycling while city officials receive awards for having a wonderful rcycling program for people living in single-family homes. Try getting a municipally-contracted trash service to collect recycables when the city council is unable to have any authority of the company's actions. Try keeping a smile and an attitude that it is all for the Earth when people who have been polluting for years are given tax breaks or other significant financial incentives to reduce their waste stream production when their neighbors have been doing the right thing for years without any financial incentive or other recognition. Indeed, ridicule is often how people who attempt to modify the consumption culture, in their own lives and in their own surroundings, are frequently greeted.

We need both the life-sized heros who carry their cloth bags with them to have on hand for any occasion just as we need the heros who choose to make a career out of doing bigger deeds to help balance humans and the rest of the planet.

Have a Happy Earth Day - all year long.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ordinary People Posted by: YogiBear

Comments are closed-

My nominee--Cal State Long Beach Associated Students
Posted by: Sojourner on Apr 22, 2006 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They run the nearby recycling center. The funds are used to spread the word about the dangers to our planet. The center is staffed by students (Paid. Sure. For sorting through yucky cans and broken bottles and helping change the results of folks who don't yet know the difference between cardboard and cereal packaging. And hauling off the stuff the jerks leave who think it's a dump. Paid, but not enough.)

It adds up to nothing more than a gesture. But it's been there a whole lot longer than the city's coded trash barrels for sorting. And it led the way to the container tax that keeps our street people in cigarettes, wine, and other assorted condiments.

A drop in the bucket, to be sure. What's that they say about the "long journey"? Oh yeah, it begins with a first step.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The Living Desert
Posted by: Artkansas on Apr 22, 2006 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously, the biggest struggle is to awaken the slumbering SUV crowds out of their torpor to realize how they are connecting with the world out there, a world that few seem to know of or assign much importance. The world beyond work and home.

I'd like to salute all those at The Living Desert in Palm Desert and Indian Wells.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

AF
Posted by: catfish on Apr 22, 2006 1:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jessica,

Check out earthteam.net , and environmental network for teens, teachers, and youth leaders.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I find it strange...
Posted by: mousemanjp on Apr 22, 2006 10:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I submitted Mr. Green as a possible candidate for 'Eco-Heroes'... No vote was held, so the Green Gonzo Group never made it in this article...., however I recommend people enlighten themselves and visit http://www.mrgreen.biz anyways. You might be suprised what kind of situation is really affecting the "Hero" today.

Happy Earth Day, Lets Stop F*cking Her Up!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

While men plan wars, women try to save the planet.
Posted by: mkeeling@jam.rr.com on Apr 22, 2006 10:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only two out of 10 eco-heroes were men. Isn't that something!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Folkmon
Posted by: Folkmon on Apr 23, 2006 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
100 Vanity Faire eco-heroes and all we can come up with or recognize is NINE! Alternet needs to list all the choices from its readers and give those out there putting their bodies and convictions where their mouths are. Some of them may be our neighbors and we'd like to thank them or work with them on a grass roots level. I look forward to seeing more real eco-heroes on your site in the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Folkmon Posted by: Cityzen Jane

Comments are closed-

Some of the other nominees
Posted by: Matthew Wheeland on Apr 24, 2006 12:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for all your comments. Given the short timeline that we executed this project in (5 days from start to finish), it's unavoidable that we missed some important nominees. The nine leaders above are the activists who got the most votes in our survey.

Some of the other notable names are:
Alice Waters, Chez Panisse/Edible Schoolyard; Paul Watson, Sea Shepherd; Vandana Shiva, author and activist; David Suzuki, Suzuki Foundation; Karen Pickett, Bay Area Coalition for Headwaters; Wangari Maathai, Green Belt Movement; Julia Buttefly Hill, Circle of Life; Dr. James Hansen, NASA ; Richard Gienger, Trees Foundation; Suzan Clausen, Surfrider - USA; Lester Brown, Earth Policy Institute; and Judi Bari, Earth First!.

Thanks again to everyone for your participation, and be sure to check out the 2006 Goldman Environmental Prize winners, announced today in San Francisco.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS