Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Environment

Enviros Across the Border

By Oliver Bernstein, Grist.org. Posted March 28, 2006.


Mexican activists have a lot to teach the U.S. about how to get communities invested in solving environmental problems.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

As the border organizer for Sierra Club's Environmental Justice program, I bounce back and forth across the U.S.-Mexico border supporting grassroots environmental activists. More than the food, language, or currency, the biggest difference from one side to the other is what issues are considered "environmental." Perhaps nowhere else on earth is there such a long border between such a rich country and such a struggling one, and this disparity seems to carry over to which issues take priority.

For example, Laguna La Escondida in Reynosa, Mexico, a water source for the surrounding community whose name means Hidden Lagoon, is also an important migratory bird stopover point. Reynosa citizens concerned about their environment are working to clean up the lagoon to protect their families' health from the waste dumped into its waters. Neighboring Texas citizens concerned about their environment are working to clean up the lagoon to prevent habitat destruction for hundreds of migratory birds. This binational effort is a terrific start, but it avoids confronting the issue of poverty. For all their goodwill and concern, the Texans' narrow focus on bird habitat prevents many of them from seeing the bigger problem -- human habitat.

Since the enactment of NAFTA in 1994, rapid industrialization along the border has led to some of the fastest population growth in either country. Almost 12 million people now live in Mexico and the United States along the nearly 2,000-mile border, and by 2020 that number could reach 20 million. This is not "smart growth," but instead a ferocious growth to support the movement of consumer goods.

NAFTA was supposed to bring economic prosperity to Mexico, but the poverty and human suffering along the border tell a different story. Mexico's more than 3,000 border maquiladoras -- the mostly foreign-owned manufacturing and assembly plants -- send about 90 percent of their products to the United States. The Spanish word "maquilar" means "to assemble," but it is also slang for "to do someone else's work for them." This is what's really going on; the maquiladora sector produced more than $100 billion in goods last year, but the typical maquiladora worker earns between $1 and $3 per hour, including benefits and bonuses. Special tariff-free zones along the border mean that many maquiladoras pay low taxes, limiting the funds that could improve quality of life.

Those who don't work in the maquiladoras live in their shadows. The industrial growth has drawn more people and development to the region, putting additional pressure on communities and the environment. Towns that until recently were small agricultural settlements now produce toxic chemicals for a worldwide market. Informal, donkey-drawn garbage carts cannot keep up with the waste stream from booming border cities. The natural environment suffers, indeed, but the most immediate suffering is human.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Oliver Bernstein is a Sierra Club environmental-justice organizer along the U.S.-Mexico Border.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Mexico is not struggling at all--it has the solution!
Posted by: Doubtom on Mar 28, 2006 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mexico has no environmental problems, it exports them northward.

Mexico is "struggling" alright, it's struggling to maintain the uneven distribution of its wealth that is responsible for the northward migration of its people.

Mexico is NOT a poor country and clowns like Vincente Fox would do well to devote their attention to keeping their citizens within Mexico, instead of clamoring for the rights of those who illegally enter the USA.

People, in sufficient numbers, can also be considered polution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rory Cox
Posted by: rcox on Mar 28, 2006 9:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for a fine article. In addition to what the author describes, Northern Mexico has become an energy maquiladora for the United States. Dirty power plants that are unwanted in the U.S. have been proliferating along the border. The power generated is generally exported right to the U.S. Now there are also plans to construct liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals in Mexico largely to serve the U.S., and because people in California generally don't want LNG terminals. Currently, Sempra and Shell are currently building an LNG terminal on a pristine Baja coastline. This is a dangerous trend not only for Mexico, but for people in California who are opposed to increasing dependence on polluting foreign fossil fuels. Read more at lngwatch.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bad news and good news
Posted by: Sojourner on Mar 28, 2006 1:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The bad news is that I’ve learned from the environmental movement is that there is no current form of government that does not rely on and promote pollution--human and environmental. Throw around all the names you can think of: democracy, socialist, republic, conservative, liberal, etc. All of them are complicit in the destruction of their environments.

The good news is that it will be easy to identify an able government--if one ever emerges. It will fight pollution tooth-and-nail.

Go Green! It's more than a color. It's what matters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

otto
Posted by: otto on Mar 28, 2006 4:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want to thank Oliver Bernstein for some great new insights - for me at least - in seeing the environmental problems of the poor and how the economic situation along the border plays a big part in the picture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you
Posted by: OliverB on Apr 1, 2006 6:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am glad that many of you enjoyed my essay on the human side of the environmental fight. Be sure to visit Grist to check out the entire Poverty and the Environment series, which is excellent. We must keep discussing these important issues if we want to move toward solutions together.

In Solidarity,
Oliver Bernstein
Sierra Club

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]