Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Environment

Making a Mockery of Conservation

By Kelpie Wilson, TruthOut.org. Posted October 7, 2005.


The Bush administration and its industry pals are using the hurricane disasters to target the Arctic Refuge and offshore drilling, and get even richer in the bargain.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

A senior energy analyst at the recent API (American Petroleum Institute) convention warned that if the U.S. petroleum industry doesn't reduce its refining capacity, it will never see any substantial increase in refining margins...
- Internal Chevron document, November 30, 1995

Billionaire oil baron John Paul Getty knew that the secret to accumulating great wealth was to never miss an opportunity. He even installed a pay telephone at his English country estate to ensure that guests paid for their own calls. If he wasn't going to get your dime one way, he'd get it another.

The Bush regime follows the same methods to accumulate wealth and power, and they've had no trouble finding ways to use the recent hurricane disasters to keep fortunes flowing their way.

Bush and the Republicans have a well-known agenda of removing all regulatory restrictions on industry. They have already suspended labor and contracting laws to "speed" Gulf Coast reconstruction. Now they are using the disaster-spawned energy crunch to break down environmental laws and restrictions that they failed to destroy with last summer's energy bill. Three big ones are now in their sights: the Clean Air Act, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and restrictions on offshore oil drilling.

The House is scheduled to vote today on what's being called the "refinery bill" after the perceived need to hurry up and build a lot of new oil refineries. All summer long (since well before hurricane season), the business press was blaming high gas prices on a lack of refinery capacity. Supposedly, strict environmental laws have kept new refineries from being built. But the reality is far different.

Several years ago, Senator Ron Wyden's office started looking into the issue of U.S. refinery capacity and found documents -- oil industry internal memos -- that show that oil companies deliberately shut down refineries all through the 1990s in order to keep supply throttled and profit margins high.

Wyden stated: "Information I have received during my ongoing investigation raises serious concerns that the nation's major oil suppliers have set out in a strategic effort to orchestrate a financial triple play, a coordinated effort that would reduce supply, raise prices at the pump and relax environmental regulations."

Between 1995 and 2001, 24 refinery closings took offline nearly 830,000 barrels of oil per day. At the same time, oil industry profits rose hugely. Taking the example of Texaco, the report found that while the company's production steadily decreased from 1998 to 2000, its net income more than quadrupled during the same period. Texaco gets high marks as an energy hog. You can read Wyden's report here. [PDF]

Now that they've got the reduced supply and high prices they wanted, the oil industry is working on the relaxing-environmental-rules part of their triple play, and that's what the refinery bill is really about.

The real target of the refinery bill is the Clean Air Act's New Source Review (NSR). The NSR program requires owners of aging power plants and industrial facilities to modernize pollution controls whenever they expand their facilities and increase emissions. But the refinery bill doesn't just exempt refineries from New Source Review requirements. It exempts ALL energy industry facilities -- approximately 20,000 large industrial facilities and power plants across the country -- not just on the Gulf Coast.

The refinery bill would also allow cities with the worst smog problems to simply skip their cleanup deadlines for years. And it would take refinery permitting authority away from states, keeping the power flowing to the federal government.

The bill would also repeal the one environmental accomplishment that the Bush administration can take credit for: EPA's new clean diesel standards. A great chance to clean up that mistake!

The public learned this week that House Republicans would not try to open up the Arctic Refuge and protected offshore areas to oil drilling with this refinery bill, but it will be a short respite. Republicans will insert both items into the budget reconciliation process that starts at the end of October. That's how it works. They never miss an opportunity.

It was a little disconcerting to see that the Bush administration has actually launched an energy conservation program as announced this week. It's just not like them. Could they be slipping? Trying to give something back to the little people? Perhaps something like the two-billion-dollar program the Canadian government just approved to give rebates to people struggling with high energy costs?

But no worries, Bush's program is nothing but an ad campaign that uses a cartoon mascot, "Energy Hog," to pass out tips to consumers to help "put the chill on winter energy bills."

The only problem is that Energy Hog is dressed like a punk anarchist, with spiky hair and piercings. He looks nothing at all like J. Paul Getty. Kids might get the wrong idea.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Kelpie Wilson is the environment editor of TruthOut.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
adp3d
Posted by: adp3d on Oct 7, 2005 3:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
J.R. Ewing lives!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Getting most Americans ready for the costs of peak oil.
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Oct 7, 2005 4:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have little doubt that Bush & Company are getting most Americans ready to live at a lower standard of living as peak oil has begun to show it's affect on oil prices. Peak oil is a queueing problem. The number of servers is declining while the number of consumers in the queue is going up and down. This is what causes the price of oil to be volitile as peak oil is being reached. When it has been reached, the price will curve upwards and find a stable price when demand is reduced by keeping consumers out of the queue.

Regarding the drilling for additional oil, the price of pumping oil from small oil reserves of low quality oil will be quite high. Processing this oil to be ready for refining will add to the cost of fuel. In the case of oil sands, tars and shale oil, the situation becomes far more expensive as the product will have to be converted to a synthetic form for use. The remaining slag from this conversion will produce polution on a scale that has not been seen since the 1940s with most of it poisoning our water. The situation will be far worse than current mountain top mining practices in the east along the Appalachian mountain range.

In all cases, large swaths of clear cutting timber will be required. Since the inner mountain west is the target of most of the new drilling activity on public lands including our best parks, the only people that will profit by this are the oil and drilling companies. The amount of oil produced is so little, that the time and resources spent on this boondoggle would be better spent on the engineering of renewable energy sources. Unfortunately, there are no national plans for such a policy and the Apollo Alliance has shown nothing but lip service to the public (grassroots support), while lining the pockets of their own elite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good article
Posted by: knitter on Oct 7, 2005 5:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article.

For additional information on how governmental policies are making a mockery of conservation, of environment, of local jurisdiction and more, read Robert F Kenndy Jr.'s speech: http://www.sierraclub.org/pressroom/rfkspeech/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Regulations were never the problem
Posted by: asque on Oct 7, 2005 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It does not pay for a business to keep excess capibility, so they have eliminated the ability to deal with any emergency. US oil production peaked in the 70's, and since refined products are more expensive than crude, of course new refining capibility was built overseas to move the profits and jobs elsewhere while refineries were closed in the US.

Regulations were never the problem, even if BushCO gave their friends a brand new refinery, the only effect would be that another refinery somewhere else in the US would be closed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

agitator church and state
Posted by: eileenflmng on Oct 7, 2005 7:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why don't we the people do something other than kvetch about the mess we have brought upon ourselves by our addictions to over-consumption and dependence on foreign oil?

Why don't we the people quit buying gas guzzlers and go Hybrid, walk or use public transportation?

Why don't we the people wake up and see that we are a big part of the problem?

We would not have the mess in "Mess-o-potamia" if we weren't dependent on foreign oil.

We the people could do so much more to conserve energy and explore new technologies.
Do we have the will to change or do we just want to whine like powerless people?

Only when we DO SOMETHING will we be able to leave this world a little better than the mess we have at present.

www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When Did Conservative Change Meaning?
Posted by: cstriker on Oct 7, 2005 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really, when did conservative go from being fiscally and morally conservative to just morally conservative. I thought the "Liberals" were supposed to be the one throwing money at problems without results.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Make your voice heard on this issue!
Posted by: DrewMcC on Oct 7, 2005 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Contact your Representative about this bill today! Take Action on the Wilderness Society's action page.

And as mentioned above, some in Congress haven't given up their shortsighted plan to drill the Arctic Refuge. There's a toll free number you can call to be directly connected right now to urge your Senators and Reps to vote against Arctic Drilling if it's in the budget reconciliation bill (or anywhere else they sneak it):

1-888-8-WILDAK

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Everything is reason for this admin. to crack Arctic.
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Oct 7, 2005 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you say to this administration "There's oil to be made from the bottom of a Port-o-let.",they'd start a war on shit-houses just for the profit. Truth is EVERYTHING in a capaltist society is a potiental money maker. War, disease,and food shortages
have been the staple of govt's the world over for thousands of years. The Bush folks are really good at making money on hardship. Katrina just sped up the 50 yr. redevelopment of N.O. and the rest of the Gulf region. The war makes a buttload of money for Haliburton. All fitting nicely into ol' Dubyas 'Suck the Planet Dry'campaign. The Artic has been under assult for decades. Even when they could'nt drill in the Refuge,they had offshore slant drilling. Each having it's spills that,although normal to the operation, are unreported environmental anathmas. Now think about the fact that every
month along the entire length of Alaskan Pipeline there are enough leaks to make a 'Exxon' size spill. Which is also considered accepable. The same fate awaits the ANWR. We have a ruling class that has built their wealth on a finite resource and it's by products. All the while the plant products that made these products were being legislated into historical
oblivion by willing govt officals who had 'intrests' to maintain.
Then these greedy fools set up govts in the countries that also
had their oil and their decendants and puppets are now are 'emenies'. To save the ANWR we have to stop big oil,big govt,and big money. Stop buying cars that don't get 50 mpg.
Forget SUVs. They drive the oil glut,plus, they don't have to be that safe. Pull your money out of the bank and put it in a personal safety deposit box. You won't get any intrest,but you won't get taxed either,and the bankers can't use it to fund ANWR drilling. We can GROW all the FUEL we'll ever need. It's time to get it done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Peak Oil is a Reality
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Oct 7, 2005 6:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a thoughtful, in-depth article on peak oil and America's dependence on foreign oil, look up the website www.oilempire.us. It will definitely give you something to think about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If these guys' mothers were on fire...
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Oct 7, 2005 8:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They'd claim drilling the ANWR was the only way to save her.

We all fight back in our own way...I fancy ridicule:

"Environmental Disaster: Republicans get Protection in Endangered Species Act."

EWM - (October 1, 2005) In his last act before stepping down, indicted House Majority Leader Tom DeLay inserted language into a rewrite of the Endangered Species Act that will extend its protections to scandal-plagued Republicans.

Environmentalists were outraged when they learned of DeLay’s last-minute trick. World Wildlife Watchers President Leon Lyons said, “we knew they were out to gut the Act, but we never dreamed they’d use the law that saved the Bald Eagle to save their own sorry asses from extinction...”

...DeLay stashed the language within the Act’s subsection on the West Pecos Grease Weasel (to which House Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo bears an uncanny resemblance).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Right Wing Myth Debunked
Posted by: CatDad on Oct 7, 2005 11:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most posters on this site know that perhaps the Right Wing's most effective tool is myth making: just keep repeating a short, bumper-sticker slogan and the message will bypass higher brain functions and seep into the subconscious mind as fact. Ann Coulter probably mutters "social security is bankrupt" in her sleep.

The mythmaking on the lack of refineries as the main culprit to high gas prices is one of their newer myths, and their spinmasters seldom miss a chance to spread misinformation on this issue when energy policy is being discussed.

This is one myth that I was buying until reading this article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]