Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Neck Deep in Toxic Gumbo

By Nicole Makris, AlterNet. Posted September 16, 2005.


Water quality in New Orleans -- and throughout the South -- has been deplorable for years. In Katrina's wake it just got dramatically worse.
Neck Deep in Toxic Gumbo
Neck Deep in Toxic Gumbo
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

As the government drags its feet, the unknown number of human bodies decomposing in the New Orleans floodwaters are becoming hosts for a horde of diseases. The bodies continue to fester and rot, potentially contaminating the city they used to call home.

For now, clean-up efforts focus on the essentials: removing bodies and debris and draining the floodwaters. Health and human services secretary Mike Leavitt has declared a public health emergency for the entire Gulf region, where bacteria and viruses are the most immediate threat to rescue personnel and residents, caused in no small part by all the hurricane's decomposing victims.

The Centers for Disease Control has reported four fatal instances of vibrio vulnificus, a cousin of cholera. Red Cross and other relief workers are struggling to prevent outbreaks related to salmonella, e. coli and other bacteria that cause nausea, diarrhea, and can lead to severe dehydration. There is also cause to fear the spread of hepatitis A, a virus that causes liver disease. But a real plan to assess the health problems that could plague the Gulf Coast for decades is noticeably absent.

Polluted Past

Pollution has been a major problem in Louisiana for decades before Hurricane Katrina hit. Reporter Ron Nixon coined the term "toxic gumbo" to describe the potent mix of waste that courses through the state. The Big Easy, perched at the mouth of the Mississippi River, is located at the narrow end of a funnel siphoning immense amounts of industrial, agricultural and human waste every day.

"Virtually anything could be in the water," said Jim Elder, the EPA's former National Director of Drinking Water and Groundwater. "I'm not sure that anywhere has ever seen all these chemicals put together in the same place. That's why people are referring to this as a toxic soup. I think that's a simple but apt description."

Elder says the many heavy industries based in Louisiana have been leaching chemicals into the soil and groundwater for decades. But Katrina stirred up an even deadlier mix of waste: submerged automobiles are leaking oil, gasoline and other chemicals into the floodwater; asbestos that may have been contained in old buildings has been released by the flooding and the collapse of buildings; raw sewage, decaying body parts, offshore oil rigs and possibly ruptured pipelines all pave the way for a myriad of serious and potentially fatal medical conditions.

Hazards to Heroes

Hugh Kaufman, who helped found the EPA and has worked for the agency for 35 years, was the chief EPA investigator for the post-9/11 emergency response. He's now a senior policy analyst for EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, and he's concerned about the millions of residents who may return to the new, toxic Louisiana and the rescue workers wading into the lethal stew.

"After 9/11, because the government did not do its job properly and provide the responders with the proper clothing and equipment -- like respirators -- now over 75 percent of the responders are sick as dogs," he said. "And they're starting to die off, four years after their heroic efforts in responding to 9/11.

"And I'm concerned the same thing is happening down in that region of the country," he continued, "where the responders are not provided respirators and the proper equipment to protect them from their exposures."

Given the government's already shoddy response to the disaster in Louisiana and Mississippi, Kaufman's concerns should raise many alarms. Where the World Trade Center became a deathtrap of poisonous chemicals, at least the site was relatively safe before the towers came down. Louisiana, however, has long been one of the country's most polluted areas.

The ongoing pollution of Louisiana's air, water and soil by oil refineries, hazardous waste, and whatever else has been dumped into the Mississippi River over the years have given the 85-mile stretch between Baton Rouge and New Orleans the nickname "Cancer Alley."

The moniker is sadly justified. "The chemicals that are being manufactured, stored and disposed of, where all those chemical plants are in Southern Louisiana, can cause cancer," said Kaufman, who worked on thousands of pollution cases during his tenure with the EPA, including Love Canal. "And there are high cancer rates of people living and working near those areas. That's why it's called Cancer Alley."

Cornered in Cancer Alley

Like many of the New Orleans residents who survived the breakdown of government in the days following Katrina, most people living and working in the shadow of these industry giants -- among them Shell Oil, DuPont, Dow Chemical and ExxonMobil -- have two traits common among Americans in the South: They are poor, and they are black.

According to the U.S. Census, about 1 in 10 Americans live below the poverty line. In New Orleans, that number is closer to 1 in 4. According to Beverly Wright, director of the Deep South Center for Environmental Justice at Xavier University, Louisiana has the largest share of the nation's impoverished children, and about half of the children in New Orleans live at or below the poverty line.

Robert Bullard, a pioneering activist in the environmental justice movement, said it's no coincidence that Cancer Alley happens to belch its chemicals into black neighborhoods.

Together, Wright and Bullard examined the history of responses to emergencies in African American communities. "Over the last 25 years," Bullard said, "we've gotten all kinds of case studies showing that government tends to move slowly in relation to clean-up of health-threatening Superfund sites and facilities located in minority communities."

And families who live in Cancer Alley can't just pack up and move away from the polluted backyards of industry. A few communities have sued surrounding industry and won relocation, a process in which the offending industry pays to move community members away from the dangerous plumes and air pollutants it emits.

Although relocation is a victory, it also serves to fracture tightly knit communities by scattering people across the region. And all too often, families are relocated five miles down the road -- this time in the backyard of some other industry.

The CDC reports that the national average of cancer deaths per 10,000 people is 199.8. In Louisiana, the number is 230.4. The state's cancer mortality rate ranked second highest in the nation in 2003. And African Americans are more likely than whites to have and die from lung, colorectal, breast and prostate cancers -- all which have been linked to prolonged chemical exposure.

"In many cases, the government has not operated in the best interests of poor people and people of color when it comes to enforcing environmental laws," Bullard said. "The stretch from Baton Rouge to New Orleans, that petrochemical corridor, is a hotbed for environmental racism cases. The struggle and the issues that a lot of communities in New Orleans will have to deal with now, in terms of contamination -- some of those battles were being fought before. And they will still be fought after this hurricane."

When the Water Recedes

Today, Bullard says, the issues of cleanup are larger and broader. Because of the hurricane, even affluent families were left homeless. "Now, you've leveled the playing field," Bullard said. "You're gonna have to have a lot of different, diverse folks at the table working together for the same thing. There has to be a silver lining, some type of opportunity out of this disaster.

Before any rebuilding can begin, federal, state and local governments have to work at "unwatering" the city.

"We had originally estimated about 80 days to unwater the city," said Alan Dooley of the United States Army Corp of Engineers. Dooley explained with an engineer's detail the process of re-establishing the levees. "It's looking a little more optimistic now."

Though the area may be dried out in less than 80 days, there's no telling when residents may be able to return to their homes -- if their homes are still standing.

Of those Gulf Coast residents who did not lose their houses, most of them will want to return home as soon as possible -- intuitively, once the floodwaters have been pumped and the streets drained.

Kaufman warns that this may be the worst idea yet. "The danger is actually worse when the water goes away, because you have hazardous materials more concentrated in muck and dust," said Kaufman. "People will more readily come back, and will try to clean their homes or porches. And they'll have toxic dust they'll be sweeping around. An they'll inhale it and ingest it. ... If there's no clean-up you have basically people living and trying to clean in the middle of the country's largest Superfund site."

The real danger of a breakfast of "toxic gumbo" is difficult to convey. Names like chlorobenzene, toluene, and hydrogen cyanide certainly sound dangerous, but explaining how prevalent and toxic they are is a daunting task. But EPA's Jim Elder believes if citizens don't push for a well-managed clean-up, the health effects of exposure will reveal themselves.

"Depending on the type of contamination, we could see every medical illness you can think of," Elder said. "Cancer of any type -- bladder, kidney, intestinal, lung, brain, skin cancer. ... The EPA has a list of regulated drinking water contaminants and what the health effects are of exceeding the standards. You can pick any one of those chemicals, and each of them could be present in the Gulf Coast area right now."

Even worse, the combined effects of all these chemicals is completely unknown. "You're gonna have so many of these chemicals interacting, and most of these chemicals have only been tested one at a time," Elder said. "They have never looked at the synergistic effect of all these chemicals on human health."

Cost to the Coast

The process of ensuring the health and safety of those who return to the areas affected by Katrina will take time and money, and might be the biggest clean-up effort ever for the EPA.

"To get a good handle on this, people are going to have to study the environmental impacts and human health effects on a broader scale than they did with 9/11," Elder said. "It's certainly on a broader scale than any of the recent disasters that I can think of in U.S. history."

As with the initial emergency response to the hurricane, the EPA, FEMA, and other agencies involved in the clean-up are under-funded and under-prepared for such a large undertaking.

"You have to have a major sampling assessment program. [People can return] when there has been a comprehensive sampling program that can give the all-clear that it's safe," said Kaufman. "There is no program in place that can even do that at the present time."

The Lexington, Kentucky Herald-Ledger reported that the storm damaged 31 Superfund sites and 466 chemical plants. Close to 400 calls came through the EPA and Coast Guard hotline to report oil and chemical spills, and clean-up workers continue to find empty containers that once housed hazardous material.

Kaufman believes it's just not a safe place to go home to yet. "Little kids walk around and get dirt in their mouths from their hands," he continued. "And it's not just New Orleans. It's all the areas where there were releases of hazardous material and sewage. The water being pumped out of New Orleans is now spreading that to Lake Ponchartrain, the Mississippi, and ultimately the Gulf of Mexico. It's expanding the area of contamination."

Even if there are serious health risks in returning home, it may be a difficult decision for evacuees to stay away. As Beverly Wright points out, even families that do have relatives nearby are living in extremely cramped quarters. Her extended family, for instance -- all 26 members -- is holed up at her inlaws' house in Baton Rouge.

But Elder and Kaufman maintain that it could, and should, take years to make the area inhabitable again. Some areas could be inhabitable sooner, but what is important, they say, is to make sure that every effected area is tested for contamination. "Based on Love Canal, it will take a minimum of 10 years to do the monitoring and cleanup," Kaufman said.

"There needs to be a well-coordinated, well-thought-out strategy as to how this is going to be tracked, assessed, evaluated and proper decisions made," Elder said.

With the tragedy of Katrina behind them, the most responsible thing to do for the people of the Gulf Coast is to ensure that the many potential health hazards are avoided. The city of New Orleans, and the Gulf Coast region, must demand a full-fledged clean up, stress Bullard and Dr. Wright.

"History has shown us that oftentimes if a community is poor and happens to be a community of color, it has to fight for things that most white people take for granted," said Bullard. "We're gonna have to make sure ... that we address environmental conditions within that particular community, and treat it as if the president of the United States lived next door."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Nicole Makris works for the SPIN Project and has written for Mother Jones, Hyphen Magazine, and other publications.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I sometimes wonder why the Dems weren't bold enough to be pro-environment
Posted by: NDnative on Sep 16, 2005 6:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again, the lessons of framing do show that had we a Democratic Party in LA that was bold enough to make the case for fixing the environment in LA and not falling into neocon traps, this toxic mess in LA would have been minimized and the Democrats wouldn't be bashed by the cons as corrupt even when the cons have proven themselves far more corrupt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Are you a Republican? Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Are you a Republican? Posted by: holojojo
The SPIN Project is an Apt Title
Posted by: NoPCZone on Sep 16, 2005 7:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Water quality in New Orleans -- and throughout the South -- has been deplorable for years"

Only in Ohio, not in the south, has a river caught on fire.

From the EPA website
"Fires plagued the Cuyahoga beginning in 1936 when a spark from a blow torch ignited floating debris and oils. Fires erupted on the river several more times before June 22, 1969, when a river fire captured national attention when Time magazine described the Cuyahoga as the river that "oozes rather than flows" and in which a person "does not drown but decays."

USA Today 2002
"The worst dead zone since the early 1980s formed offshore between Ohio and Ontario, Canada, last summer, a sign that the lake's environmental progress is shifting into reverse.

With a larger dead zone expected to form this summer in the central basin, ships loaded with scientists and monitoring equipment will try to determine what is threatening to undo years of environmental improvement.

"I don't want to sound alarmist, but we have no idea, really, what is going on," Murray Charlton, a scientist at Canada's National Water Research Institute told The Cleveland Plain Dealer.

Already this spring, an Environmental Protection Agency boat has found water samples heavily clouded with algae and other forms of floating plant life.

Too much algae is a sign that nutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen are overabundant — a combination that eventually creates a barren region beneath the surface. In effect, the nutrients enrich the lake to death.

A lake can die when its bottom becomes covered with too much decomposing plant matter, which consumes more and more oxygen as it rots. When the oxygen is gone, the suffocating swath becomes lifeless."

There are plenty of examples. Do not give us you condescending regional racism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lord have mercy
Posted by: Olympiada on Sep 16, 2005 7:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am sorry my atheist friends, I have to pray on this one.
Oh.
Our poor mother earth and her inhabitants. This is the worst I have ever seen. Never in my life did I imagine I would see something like this.
Again, a significant dream last night.
We must all do what we can to help.
Some of us are called to called physical action, others social, others political, others spiritual, or any combination.
Let us all honor each others gifts during this time of horrible ecological crisis and do what we can to make a difference.

This is environmental and social injustice in the extreme.

Teachers: pay attention to how your idealistic youth are being affected by this. That photograph of the corpse is very graphic. Use your discretion in exposing minors to this information. Some are extremely sensitive and could become filled with despair. This is a very adult crisis.

Just a word of warning. This is no PG-13 movie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lord have mercy Posted by: baseplate
» Sorry to burn your heart Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Sorry to burn your heart Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Lord have mercy Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Lord have mercy Posted by: cyclone
» RE: Lord have mercy Posted by: nickptar
» My dramatics Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: My dramatics Posted by: nickptar
» I am starting to be left alone Posted by: La Femme Nikita
» RE: Lord have mercy Posted by: stoney13
» Thank you again Stoney 13 Posted by: Olympiada
Not the river
Posted by: Graydon Wilson on Sep 16, 2005 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While it's true that the Mississippi River carries with it the waste and run-off of hald the nation, it's not the problem. It wasn't the river that flooded New Orleans. It was the lake.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not the river Posted by: bornxeyed
water quality is racism?
Posted by: blueneck on Sep 16, 2005 9:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, not so, at least not deliberately (which I would say would be a sine qua non for racism). Rather stupidity and the pursuit of industry at all costs. There are a lot of rich whites in NO and the surrounding areas drinking the same water. And water quality has never been high on the mayors of NO's agendas, and for the last several years all have been black.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: water quality is racism? Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: water quality is racism? Posted by: blueneck
» RE: water quality is racism? Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: water quality is racism? Posted by: holojojo
Criminal Negligence
Posted by: linguizic on Sep 16, 2005 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our current legislators ALL need to be thrown in prison for GROSS CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE. The Dems are weak and can't be strong and stand up to the villiany of the current Republicans. Because of this, they share nearly as much guilt. Katrina is a complete failure of our political system. Most of the Dems with the exception of Nancy Pelosi and a couple of others, lack strength. Not the blind ignorant and arrogant "strength" that conservatives prat about all the time, but the real strength of a mother defending her children. We progressives can no longer afford to "play it safe" politically and kiss ass to the myth of the "right shifting electorate". We need to show that the Republicans are treasonous villains who are exploiting poor people and the middle class for their own financial gain. To do so we need to divide and conquer the conservatives. Make them squabble within their factions, as they are at least as numerous as progressive factions. Find issues that destroy the solidarity of their bloc.

Katrina is the perfect example of why we need to get our asses in gear and put up the good fight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Supersized Love Canal
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Sep 16, 2005 11:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Big oil, over a dozen refineries and regularly broken oil pipes that are exposed to the surface are just a small part of the visible problems of the Toxic Coast from Mississippi through east Texas. The Mississippi delta has been dying for well over 150 years now at a rate of 25 sq. mi. / year or more. Massive amounts of industrial waste, oil and it's distillates, pcbs, cleaning solvents and products that are so toxic that they are supposed to be under federal control (I've worked at a semiconductor company)... are polluting the ground water and moving into the lakes and the Gulf of Mexico, creating a heavy toxic sludge oozing at the bottom of the waters of the surrounding communities.

One of the biggest failures of the media has been in the total blackout of these areas and what they look like. Port Fourchon, where the giant oil tankers dock at the end of the Mississippi river, where Belle Pass, e-Slip and the Northern Expansion are ( http://sea.portfourchon.com/home.asp ) is all but devoid of living plant life. It is places like this, and there are many along the gulf's oil coast, that makes me wonder just how much damage has been done by hurricane Katrina, in addition to the toxins that this administration's EPA has allowed to be pumped directly out of New Orleans and easter parishes, directly into Lake Pontchetrain.

My question: is there anyone or any organization that understands the size of this catastrophy and what it would take to not only clean up the area, but begin to create the wetlands that were once there that were not only natural barriers against storms, but the biggest fresh and brackish water cleaning system in the northern hemisphere, if not the world?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Supersized Love Canal Posted by: robertjneal
» RE: Supersized Love Canal Posted by: bornxeyed
» Lyndon H. LaRouche & Franklin Delano Roosevelt Posted by: sheila_jones1007@sbcglobal.net
» RE: Lyndon H. LaRouche & Franklin Delano Roosevelt Posted by: sheila_jones1007@sbcglobal.net
» RE: Supersized Love Canal Posted by: holojojo
Well, We Had Plenty Of Warning Didn't We!!!
Posted by: stoney13 on Sep 16, 2005 12:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OH GOD, SAVE ME FROM THE PIOUS WAILS OF THE HAND-RINGING RIGHT-WINGERS, CRYING OUT THAT ITS NOT THEIR FALULT!! ALRIGHT !! IT AIN'T! ITS OUR FAULT!!!

All of us let Big Oil, Big Chemical, and Big Manufacturing go in there and pretty much gave them card blanche to do just whatever they wanted! Every time somebody brought up the terrible cost to the environment,all they had to do was cry about how regulated their industry had become and how they would have to send all our jobs to China if things got any worse!

WELL GUESS WHAT! IT JUST GOT WORSE!

So whose fault is it? Oh its so easy to point the finger at Corporate America! If you leave your hen-house open and a fox eats your chickens its not the fox's fault!! YOU FAILED TO PROTECT THE CHICKENS!!! Well guess what! We failed to protect the environment!!

We all know what Big Business is about. They get what they can, then get while the gettin's good! How many abandoned Superfund sites do we need to show us the truth of this!

Who's fault is it? OURS! Who caused it? US! Who's gonna pay for it? WE ARE!!!

Mabee this will wake us all up to the truth?

NOT FUCKING LIKELY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good point! Posted by: Olympiada
» I love johnny boy 2 LOL Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: I love johnny boy 2 LOL Posted by: stoney13
» ya'll are so weird Posted by: matrid
Environmental catastrophe
Posted by: Falang on Sep 16, 2005 3:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is interesting to see on the canadian news that they had a major spill of oil when a big tank of oil broke at one of the raffinery near NO, I think it is at the Exxon raffinery if my memory is good. They ban journalist to go near the site so this news is nowhere to be seen in american media at this time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's try to be kind.
Posted by: mf-roe on Sep 16, 2005 7:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think everyone should buy a nice box of Gulf Shrimp and send it to their favorite Important Person. The stupid ones will eat it and I hope they enjoy it. The smart ones will realize that its not just "those people" who are going to be faced with the results of flushing all the crap into the food stream.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good point, and scary one too Posted by: Olympiada
America the Beautiful
Posted by: sovinformburo on Sep 17, 2005 4:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
O beautiful for smog filled skies
For amber waves genetically modified grain
And strip mined mountain travesties
Above the wetback fruit pickers in the plain
America, America, God shed his grace on WASPs
And crown thy hood with dividends
While the levees let in the foaming sea

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: America the Beautiful Posted by: stoney13
How ridiculous
Posted by: IndyElliott on Sep 18, 2005 5:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nicole Makris wrote an excellent piece. Most of the crap that followed was a serious waste of cyberspace. A good number of you children should go do your homework and shut up. You didn't add anything of value to the discussion and I get tired of reading hateful name-calling and other childish prattle. AlterNet should consider scrapping this idea. This service should be kept down on the farm where manure spreaders have use.
Here’s a rule several of you, here and in other threads, need to learn – Quoting a person or a publication without crediting the source is called plagiarism! It's just wrong. Moreover, how do we know you didn't just invent the entire quote?
AlterNet - I'd like the option of just reading the article without wasting the download time on the subsequent crap. Several other sites I visit do that by putting the remarks on a separate link. Give that some thought, please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How ridiculous Posted by: bornxeyed
the corporations
Posted by: srob on Sep 18, 2005 5:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE..TO THE FLAG..OF THE UNITED STATES OF HALLIBURTON..AND TO THE REPUBLICAN..FOR WHICH HE PROFITS..ONE CORPORATION..UNDER "DOD"..INVINCIBLE..W/ LIBERTY OIL..A BLOODY IRAQ..AND A CORPORATE FASCIST WAR MACHINE..4 ALL!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the corporations Posted by: bornxeyed
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement