Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Environment

Environmentalists on the Fringe

By Michael J. Kavanagh, Grist.org. Posted July 13, 2005.


Equating eco-activists with terrorism is now commonplace among conservative mouthpieces and the FBI alike.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

What liberals and their allies in the environmentalist wacko movement fail to understand is: their message has gotten out. Their anti-capitalist, socialist, gloom-and-doom, fear-based, lunatic ravings have been amplified -- and Americans understand exactly who they are, and what they're about. As the "Mr. Big" of the vast right-wing conspiracy, I am proud, ladies and gentlemen, to play a major part in the exposé leading to their depression.

- Rush Limbaugh April 25, 2005

Currently, about 20 million people tune in to Rush Limbaugh every week. His lingo is now conservative lingua franca. Limbaugh figured out that if you repeat your best lines -- e.g., "environmentalist wackos" -- often enough, they become more than just funny catchphrases; they become a reconfiguration of reality and a call to arms. In his world (and it's a world in which a lot of people live), you can't be an environmentalist and escape wacko-ism.

In Limbaugh, a large group of Americans who felt their country was being taken away from them found an emotional outlet. If his facts didn't always ring true, his anger did. Limbaugh proved that someone with a quick wit and a microphone could wield tremendous power, and his success spawned a legion of copycat shows across the country.

One of them is hosted by John Stokes of KGEZ in Montana's Flathead Valley. Stokes is featured in the new PBS film The Fire Next Time, which premiered on July 12. The documentary was made by Patrice O'Neill and The Working Group, a film company that also works with communities to overcome intolerance. The film follows several groups in Kalispell, Mont., over a two-year period in which their community goes up in flames -- figuratively and literally -- over conflicts about environmental preservation.

Everybody in Kalispell cares about trees. Trees feed the timber industry, help drain the land, attract tourists, and provide habitat for wildlife; and they also catch fire and endanger homes and lives during the annual forest-fire season. Talking about trees in Kalispell means talking about livelihoods and lifestyles, and the valley's different interest groups are like sticks dangerously rubbing together in its drought-plagued forests.

Enter Stokes, radio host and human blowtorch. On environmentalists, Stokes has this to say: "Eradicate 'em. Their message stinks. They're destroying America. And it all came out of the Third Reich. You know, the Third Reich was born out of the environmental community. I don't make it up. It's there." Stokes attends town meetings, holds rallies, and burns green swastikas to protest what he sees as the tyranny of liberals, the U.S. Forest Service, immigrants, the government, and, of course, the people he refers to as "eco-Nazis" and "green Nazis."

"John Stokes came to this valley and all of the sudden the people had a way of telling the truth," says one timber worker featured in the film.

Clearly, Stokes and his listeners are angry. They're angry at the Forest Service and the more uncompromising environmentalists for not letting loggers thin the forests in a way that will (they think) boost the flagging Montana economy and prevent fires. They're angry about losing their timber-industry jobs. They're angry about watching property values soar as millionaires buy weekend ranches in the valley.

During forest-fire season, when the valley's residents are at their most vulnerable, Stokes' provocations are strongest. "Anybody who's ever written a check to the Sierra Club, the Nature Conservancy, Audubon, Citizens for a Better Planet," he says, "hope you're happy with yourself, 'cause we blame you." Stokes warns his listeners to be careful, because "there are eco-arsonist terrorists out there." He holds up a copy of an Earth Liberation Front manual and tells the camera, "They just had a terror training camp in Missoula in June."

It's not true, but it doesn't matter: with his rants, Stokes has placed environmentalism squarely in the middle of the most charged discourse in post-9/11 America -- the one revolving around the word "terrorism." And while Stokes seems extreme, these days, he's not the only one warning of an alleged link between environmentalists and terrorists. Joe Friday is too.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Michael J. Kavanagh is a writer and public radio reporter.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Irony of Fighting Terra-Terrorism
Posted by: nanobubble on Jul 13, 2005 6:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The ironic issue at hand is that the 'eco-activists' are fighting for the earth - terra - by assaulting the people and machines which work to terrorize it.

Who is the terrorist? The group which actively terrorizes the earth, or the group which defends the earth against that terror?

The answer is: both. But you won't hear that from 'conservative mouthpieces' or the FBI

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Follow the dollars- Monsanto sets policy
Posted by: acaryatid on Jul 13, 2005 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From PCB's and Agent Orange to GM pesticide plants and hormone milk, MONSANTO has directed policy. Monsanto's George Poste now heads the Agro-terror efforts. Here's a piece Organic Consumers posted a while ago.

FBI Bioterrorist Profile
Report unusual activities, FBI agent tells farmers
January 28 The Enterprise (Patrick County, Va.)

...Reporting unusual activities is a key to fighting agroterrorism, said Jerry Lyons, an FBI special agent who serves in the weapons of mass destruction countermeasures unit. "You might have one piece of the puzzle that could
solve the case."

Lyons and former Lt. Gov. John H. Hager, now assistant to
the governor for commonwealth preparedness, addressed farmers and agriculture leaders on December 2, during the three-day annual convention of the Virginia Farm Bureau Federation.

When asked for clues that someone might be interested in engaging in terrorism, Lyons said a potential bioterrorist might strongly oppose the consumption of milk or the use of genetically modified crops...

However, it's difficult to put together a profile of a domestic or
international terrorist, he noted. In assessing potential threat, it's appropriate to look at the resolve of the person or group, Lyons said.

Hager said "The goal of terrorists is to undermine our faith, economy, government and confidence in our food supply. We'll never know how vulnerable we are to terrorism, "Hager said. "We have to do all we can to reduce our vulnerability and do all we can to continue this way of life in America and in Virginia" www.ext.vt.edu/pubs/farm-security

Full story from Organic Consumers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terrorists, Commies, and Wackos, oh my!
Posted by: hagwind on Jul 13, 2005 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree, it's a matter of major concern when government agencies like the FBI start throwing words like "eco-terrorism" around, but are we surprised? Is this new? "Terrorism" and "terrorist" fill the niche that was once conveniently filled by "Communism" and "Communist." Powerful words, these: they cause short-circuits in rational minds and total meltdowns in less rational minds. Rush Limbaugh, John Stokes, et al. are no dummies; they know a good weapon when they see one. J. Edgar Hoover, among others, tried to discredit the civil rights movement by calling Martin Luther King Jr. a Communist. Etc., etc., etc. Same old same-old.

While we're on the subject of words, apart from the size of the audience, what's the difference between Limbaugh ranting about "environmental wackos" and liberals ranting about "religious wackos"?

And while we're on the subject of Limbaugh, don't assume that his 20 million (or whatever the figure is) listeners are all being swayed by his every word. I suspect that plenty listen primarily for the entertainment value. It's not my kind of entertainment, mind you, but then I rarely go for stand-up comedy, and listening to other people make fools of themselves doesn't appeal to me. (I haven't watched a presidential speech since the Carter administration.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We've always been targets
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jul 13, 2005 11:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Environmentalists,as well as ANY activist in the U.S. has always been shot at,spit on,had fowl things thrown at us,so it's no surprize that they want to brand us terrorists. Why?
The reason is simple. We stand in the way of exploitation.
Of the People.the land,the water and the air. Bobby Seals,killed for being a black activist,Leonard Peltier, 2 life sentences for defending his people.Anne May Aquash,burnt,
beheaded with her hands and feet removed for standing up for her people.Martin Luther King for wanting equality.The list goes on,but the fact is if you support the People over the system you are a target.Growing up in the 60's I came to see that everyone is expendable for the glory of the system. The glory of the system is PROFIT AND PLUNDER ever since 1492

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

terrorism???
Posted by: retrogression on Jul 13, 2005 12:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
real, actual terrorists target PEOPLE because, by definition, the object of terrorism is to terrorize PEOPLE....the ELF & ALF have NEVER targeted PEOPLE, only PROPERTY. therefore they are not, by definition terrorists.....I think the term eco-terrorist would be better used to describe the chemical, petroleum, mining, lumber, etc. industries & the right-wing windbags like limbaugh who seem to think it's just fine to destroy & defile the environment - to poison OUR air & OUR water & sicken our children as long as its in the name of the "free-market" or making a buck. all hail the almighty dollar.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

but we need to condemn...
Posted by: brs04wsc on Jul 13, 2005 1:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
alot of environmental groups. I'll give my $ to the Sierra Club and the Nature Cons. But ELF, ALF and even PETA can go fu*k themselves, quite frankly. All these groups do is give the other side ammo to shoot back at us. 99.9999% of the environmental movement is common sense and irrefutable, but our own extremists help to sabotoge us. We need to condemn groups like these in the strongest tones, while pointing out the undeniable sense of the policies behind the vast majority of the movement. Instead we allow the right to paint the whole movement with the abysammaly ineffective tactics of fringe groups.

I know, I know: these groups aren't nearly as much the enemy as big oil, chem, etc. But here's the rub: we will never have ANY control over these interests outside of swaying public opinion enough to change government policies, and these groups push us farther away from doing just that. We CAN control finge environmental groups by refusing to fund them and by condemning them. We ARE the base - we have some semblance of control over groups of this ilk. It's time to tell our leaders: it's OK to say F ELF and ALF, aslong as you still on-board with the real movement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: but we need to condemn... Posted by: brs04wsc
» RE: but we need to condemn... Posted by: spyderbaby
Makes me want to read
Posted by: Robba29 on Jul 13, 2005 4:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After reading this, it makes me want to revisit Edward Abbey's The Monkey Wrench Gang. Ah, Hayduke, where are you when we need you?

But seriously, I have been cognizant of the ecologist=terrorist tie for a while, and firmly believed that with proper outreach it would change. Boy was I wrong! John Bellamy Foster has written some excellent books regarding economic factors and environmentalism. Most importantly is the need to temper the rhetoric of the movement that sometimes seems to put human lives and struggles on the fence and neglect those who we really should be paying attention to--the workers who are the very victims of a run amock capitalist system. It is that system that is the source of their anxiety (that the Right has so well tapped into) and the environment's demise (as gross overconsumption will always lead to degradation and exploitation). Anyway, just a thought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We're What?!?
Posted by: badger on Jul 13, 2005 5:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'Environmental community was born out of the Third Reich'?? I'm hearing rants like this more often, from conservatives in their attempts to silence Liberals, Environmentalists, etc.! Maybe I'm supposed to find where 'It's all there' is, but I'd rather hear from those of you with at least educated minds: how do conservatives arrive at the conviction that "Liberals and/or Environmentalists are like Hitler"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We're What?!? Posted by: ankh
6 Billion Eco-terrorists
Posted by: PanDeva on Jul 13, 2005 11:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Humans left and right smugly toss accusations across the void that separates them politically, but most of us live outside true human habitat, aided and abetted by technology, the source of our inevitable devolution. Armed with fire, low tech, and clothes, our distant ancestors left the equatorial paradise to pursue animal victims. In extreme latitudes, they lost their skin color and their good senses. Plant and animal species native to non-human habitats have often been supplanted by humans and their favored food, drug, and clothing plants. Without fire and tech (clothing is also tech--an extention of the skin), humans would be forced to return to their own true habitat, eat once again tree crops, and regain their color. This sounds too mythic for even the "open minded," so the likely fate of our species is extinction by removing a critical amount of the biosphere to ensure the disappearance of us and many of "them" (other life forms). NASA spends billions seeking one-celled lifeform in habitats even less suitable for tech-wielding humans, while governments virtually ignore the razing of our true habitat and thus our matrix for continued evolution. The devolutes will be "conscious" machines, and we move at an ever accelerated pace toward that darkened end.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 6 Billion Eco-terrorists Posted by: Robba29
The Nazis did quote Darwin. Understand stupidity, it happens.
Posted by: ankh on Jul 18, 2005 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read and understand the history. The Nazis did
indeed quote Darwin.

The Devil may quote Scripture, we are warned.

Understand this lest it be repeated.

One of the better short articles is by:

Stephen Jay Gould
An Evolutionary Perspective on Strengths, Fallacies, and Confusions in the Concept of Native Plants / 59k
-- it's the third link down from the top on this page:

http://www.doaks.org/WONAC.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

newskguy
Posted by: Newsguy on Jul 29, 2005 9:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, Hitler invoked God quite a bit in the 1930s. It's true. Google it. "Hitler Catholic" You will get a shot of Hitler meeting a Cardinal in 1935, and Hitler standing before a Christian Cross at a War Memorial. He was raised Catholic, but there is good evidence he rejected religion in his later years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]