ENVIRONMENT  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 20

World's Biggest Polluters Strike a Deal: U.S. and China Agree to Comprehensive Clean Energy and Climate Plan

The overall plan is much more ambitious in scope and depth than anticipated.
November 18, 2009  |  
 
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

In a joint statement, President Barack Obama and President Hu Jintao agreed on a common approach to achieve a successful outcome in international climate negotiations (emphasis added in bold):

Regarding the upcoming Copenhagen Conference, both sides agree on the importance of actively furthering the full, effective and sustained implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in accordance with the Bali Action Plan. The United States and China, consistent with their national circumstances, resolve to take significant mitigation actions and recognize the important role that their countries play in promoting a sustainable outcome that will strengthen the world's ability to combat climate change. The two sides resolve to stand behind these commitments.

In this context both sides believe that, while striving for final legal agreement, an agreed outcome at Copenhagen should, based on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, include emission reduction targets of developed countries and nationally appropriate mitigation actions of developing countries. The outcome should also substantially scale up financial assistance to developing countries, promote technology development, dissemination and transfer, pay particular attention to the needs of the poorest and most vulnerable to adapt to climate change, promote steps to preserve and enhance forests, and provide for full transparency with respect to the implementation of mitigation measures and provision of financial, technology and capacity building support.

Taken together, these commitments and statements represent an important step forward towards agreeing on a protocol for accurate accounting and verification of China's policies for achieving the necessary emissions reductions that science requires. They will also hopefully start to satisfy those skeptical that China will agree to a protocol for accurate accounting and verification of its impressive array of policies for achieving emissions reductions.

The announcements also suggest that the United States and China are on the same page when it comes to both the necessity of aggressively moving forward on an affirmative agenda to reduce carbon pollution and create millions of new clean energy jobs. The agreement contains concrete measures for sustained and meaningful collaboration and demonstrates that the two largest emitters of greenhouse gases are prepared to move beyond the tired narrative of developed versus developing country responsibilities on climate action toward a more "positive, cooperative, and comprehensive" relationship on clean energy and climate change.

We hope that the upcoming United Nations climate change summit in Copenhagen will follow this example and focus as much on bottom-up technological strategies for achieving real reductions in emissions as it will on top-down targets for carbon caps.


Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: china, energy, global warming, climate change, u.s.


Comments are closed-

PLEASE REMOVE THIS SPAM!
Posted by: Paul_C on Nov 19, 2009 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

PLEASE REMOVE THIS SPAM!
Posted by: Paul_C on Nov 19, 2009 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

PLEASE REMOVE THIS SPAM!
Posted by: Paul_C on Nov 19, 2009 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This site is run by a fund controlled by a member of Obama's transition team
Posted by: leafsong2 on Nov 19, 2009 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Podesta was also Clinton's COS. Such a partisan pedigree is unsurprising considering the undeserved praise the article lavishes on the Obama Admin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Which site? Posted by: oregoncharles

Comments are closed-

Uh yeah....
Posted by: lefty010 on Nov 19, 2009 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If this is everyone's idea of a "comprehensive" and "clean" energy plan we are totally
S-C-R-E-W-E-D!!!

Slather on the sunscreen and start building your boat folks because we will never be saved by "clean" coal or by storing greenhouse gases in the earth or by continuing to use nuclear energy with no way to dispose of its toxic/lethal by-products.

It's been a fun ride folks but that ride is just about over and you can thank the merciless, bat-shit insane, delusional, Dr. Strangelove, greedy, short-sighted, profit-at-all-costs crowd who just so happen to be the crazies at the wheel.

Yeeee Haaaawww!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Uh yeah.... Posted by: richholland

Comments are closed-

Romm has done this before - heaping exhuberant praise on a pile of steaming sh*t
Posted by: Paul_C on Nov 19, 2009 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact is that Copenhagen is being undercut by footdragging by the Obama administration, a response to corporate lobbying only slightly less disruptive than the active sabotage of Kyoto by the Bush team (and Clinton as well).

Obama's delaying of concrete action until well past the end of the Copenhagen summit renders the summit impotent to accomplish anything of substance, exactly the outcome sought by Big Oil and King Coal.

Obama's rationale for doing so, he wants to study it further and make sure it's done "right", is precisely the corporate line toed by Bush.

To heap insult on injury, these articles of intent outline a policy of heavily subsidizing fossil fuel industry approaches to mitigating global warming, placing highly toxic nuclear, highly dangerous and problematic "clean coal", and a new one - shale gas, another potentially highly toxic ecological nightmare - front and center in terms of promised development funding.

In contrast, the cleanest, cheapest, safest, most readily deployed, most decentralized technologies, wind and solar, are placed in the "to be studied further" category.

Once again we see that Obama has sold us out to the highest bidder and when push comes to shove is no different than Bush on issues of greatest importance to the American people.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obamco is as big a joke as Bushco.
Posted by: pinkfloydd on Nov 19, 2009 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately I wasted my vote on him, instead of Ron Paul (but for the record, I was originally and remain all for Dennis Kucinich).

Please explain why the hell our president isn't over here creating deals and holding summits on how to get us out of our crippling debt? On creating new, green industries? On getting affordable housing for ALL and not SOME?? Why the hell is he still stating that the illegal bailout of the very companies and industries that put us into this bind was NECESSARY AND HELPFUL??? WTF???

It should be crystal clear to all that not only is our political system a joke, the position of the president has become as powerful and important as that of Britain's Royal Court, or Japan's Emperor; a measly figurehead at best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I'll believe it when I see it
Posted by: bigbrother on Nov 19, 2009 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
China thumbs their nose at Obama - treats him like a second class citizen because they own us. They'll let Obama walk away thinking he did a good job then they'll tell him privately what THEY really expect him to do!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Take action for a strong climate bill
Posted by: greenferret on Nov 19, 2009 10:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right now, the most ambitious climate bill in Washington calls for reducing greenhouse gas emissions 7% below 1990 levels by 2020.

That's pathetic.

According to the Nobel Prize-winning International Panel on Climate Change, the world must reduce emissions far more aggressively -- 25-40% by 2020 -- to have a 50/50 chance of avoiding runaway climate change.

Tell President Obama and your Members of Congress to support an emissions reduction target of 40% by 2020.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Wow, what absolute, unmitigated BULLSHIT.
Posted by: goodyweaver on Nov 19, 2009 7:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know, when I started reading this article, I honestly thought it was a gag. I'm serious - not in some figurative way - I literally thought this article was meant to be a joke, to poke fun at the fact that pretty much nothing is really being done to reduce carbon emissions, particularly in China. But no, this is actually a REAL ARTICLE??!!?

Did anyone else notice that this supposed "plan" doesn't actually DO ANYTHING? It's just a bunch of gobbletygook about "facilitating research," "developing systems," and "launching programs of cooperation." What BULLSHIT. God.

Show me something that says "The United States will immediately cut Chinese imports by 1/3." "China will immediately pass legislation requiring factories to cut emissions by 30%" "The United States and China agree to pay reparations to the peoples of the third world most impacted by the environmental devastation caused by consumerism." Show me that. Otherwise, Joseph Romm, you big sucker, just CAN IT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obama is like George W. Bush Lite.
Posted by: ronniejw on Nov 19, 2009 7:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is just more of the same old shit. He’s like George W. Bush Lite. I will not vote for a Democrat unless they put up someone like Dennis Kucinich. Every time we elect these Democrats to office they shift to the right and start taking their orders from big Corporations. I didn’t vote for Obama and I don’t plan to vote for Obama’s re-election if he continues down the same path.

Ronnie Wright
World Change Cafe

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Pep Talk
Posted by: richholland on Nov 19, 2009 11:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Living in Asia for 15 years each year 6 monthes I MIGHT CALL THIS ARTICLE COMMUNISTIC PROPAGANDA.

even to day hungry people run from china.
even to day women and children are traficked.

Dont you realise how the little home industry looks, did you ever see sweatshops where grandma and chidren are working 12 houres a day.
Come have a look how the collected product then are assembled in a clean hall, how there is an airco office whith secretairies and managers.

And if people refuse they are put in jail.
Of course many USAcompanies will make big profits out of the deals,
but save me the shit this is to protect environ ment.
Alternet.shame on you

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This is blanketing threads and should be considered a hostile Troll attack.
Posted by: Paul_C on Nov 20, 2009 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

f
Posted by: dewre on Nov 24, 2009 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
really bad new for me. Blu ray ripper *Blu Ray Ripper for Mac

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

PLEASE REMOVE THIS SPAM!
Posted by: Paul_C on Nov 19, 2009 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

PLEASE REMOVE THIS SPAM!
Posted by: Paul_C on Nov 19, 2009 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

PLEASE REMOVE THIS SPAM!
Posted by: Paul_C on Nov 19, 2009 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This site is run by a fund controlled by a member of Obama's transition team
Posted by: leafsong2 on Nov 19, 2009 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Podesta was also Clinton's COS. Such a partisan pedigree is unsurprising considering the undeserved praise the article lavishes on the Obama Admin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Which site? Posted by: oregoncharles

Comments are closed-

Uh yeah....
Posted by: lefty010 on Nov 19, 2009 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If this is everyone's idea of a "comprehensive" and "clean" energy plan we are totally
S-C-R-E-W-E-D!!!

Slather on the sunscreen and start building your boat folks because we will never be saved by "clean" coal or by storing greenhouse gases in the earth or by continuing to use nuclear energy with no way to dispose of its toxic/lethal by-products.

It's been a fun ride folks but that ride is just about over and you can thank the merciless, bat-shit insane, delusional, Dr. Strangelove, greedy, short-sighted, profit-at-all-costs crowd who just so happen to be the crazies at the wheel.

Yeeee Haaaawww!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Uh yeah.... Posted by: richholland

Comments are closed-

Romm has done this before - heaping exhuberant praise on a pile of steaming sh*t
Posted by: Paul_C on Nov 19, 2009 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact is that Copenhagen is being undercut by footdragging by the Obama administration, a response to corporate lobbying only slightly less disruptive than the active sabotage of Kyoto by the Bush team (and Clinton as well).

Obama's delaying of concrete action until well past the end of the Copenhagen summit renders the summit impotent to accomplish anything of substance, exactly the outcome sought by Big Oil and King Coal.

Obama's rationale for doing so, he wants to study it further and make sure it's done "right", is precisely the corporate line toed by Bush.

To heap insult on injury, these articles of intent outline a policy of heavily subsidizing fossil fuel industry approaches to mitigating global warming, placing highly toxic nuclear, highly dangerous and problematic "clean coal", and a new one - shale gas, another potentially highly toxic ecological nightmare - front and center in terms of promised development funding.

In contrast, the cleanest, cheapest, safest, most readily deployed, most decentralized technologies, wind and solar, are placed in the "to be studied further" category.

Once again we see that Obama has sold us out to the highest bidder and when push comes to shove is no different than Bush on issues of greatest importance to the American people.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obamco is as big a joke as Bushco.
Posted by: pinkfloydd on Nov 19, 2009 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately I wasted my vote on him, instead of Ron Paul (but for the record, I was originally and remain all for Dennis Kucinich).

Please explain why the hell our president isn't over here creating deals and holding summits on how to get us out of our crippling debt? On creating new, green industries? On getting affordable housing for ALL and not SOME?? Why the hell is he still stating that the illegal bailout of the very companies and industries that put us into this bind was NECESSARY AND HELPFUL??? WTF???

It should be crystal clear to all that not only is our political system a joke, the position of the president has become as powerful and important as that of Britain's Royal Court, or Japan's Emperor; a measly figurehead at best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I'll believe it when I see it
Posted by: bigbrother on Nov 19, 2009 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
China thumbs their nose at Obama - treats him like a second class citizen because they own us. They'll let Obama walk away thinking he did a good job then they'll tell him privately what THEY really expect him to do!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Take action for a strong climate bill
Posted by: greenferret on Nov 19, 2009 10:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right now, the most ambitious climate bill in Washington calls for reducing greenhouse gas emissions 7% below 1990 levels by 2020.

That's pathetic.

According to the Nobel Prize-winning International Panel on Climate Change, the world must reduce emissions far more aggressively -- 25-40% by 2020 -- to have a 50/50 chance of avoiding runaway climate change.

Tell President Obama and your Members of Congress to support an emissions reduction target of 40% by 2020.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Wow, what absolute, unmitigated BULLSHIT.
Posted by: goodyweaver on Nov 19, 2009 7:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know, when I started reading this article, I honestly thought it was a gag. I'm serious - not in some figurative way - I literally thought this article was meant to be a joke, to poke fun at the fact that pretty much nothing is really being done to reduce carbon emissions, particularly in China. But no, this is actually a REAL ARTICLE??!!?

Did anyone else notice that this supposed "plan" doesn't actually DO ANYTHING? It's just a bunch of gobbletygook about "facilitating research," "developing systems," and "launching programs of cooperation." What BULLSHIT. God.

Show me something that says "The United States will immediately cut Chinese imports by 1/3." "China will immediately pass legislation requiring factories to cut emissions by 30%" "The United States and China agree to pay reparations to the peoples of the third world most impacted by the environmental devastation caused by consumerism." Show me that. Otherwise, Joseph Romm, you big sucker, just CAN IT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obama is like George W. Bush Lite.
Posted by: ronniejw on Nov 19, 2009 7:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is just more of the same old shit. He’s like George W. Bush Lite. I will not vote for a Democrat unless they put up someone like Dennis Kucinich. Every time we elect these Democrats to office they shift to the right and start taking their orders from big Corporations. I didn’t vote for Obama and I don’t plan to vote for Obama’s re-election if he continues down the same path.

Ronnie Wright
World Change Cafe

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Pep Talk
Posted by: richholland on Nov 19, 2009 11:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Living in Asia for 15 years each year 6 monthes I MIGHT CALL THIS ARTICLE COMMUNISTIC PROPAGANDA.

even to day hungry people run from china.
even to day women and children are traficked.

Dont you realise how the little home industry looks, did you ever see sweatshops where grandma and chidren are working 12 houres a day.
Come have a look how the collected product then are assembled in a clean hall, how there is an airco office whith secretairies and managers.

And if people refuse they are put in jail.
Of course many USAcompanies will make big profits out of the deals,
but save me the shit this is to protect environ ment.
Alternet.shame on you

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This is blanketing threads and should be considered a hostile Troll attack.
Posted by: Paul_C on Nov 20, 2009 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

f
Posted by: dewre on Nov 24, 2009 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
really bad new for me. Blu ray ripper *Blu Ray Ripper for Mac

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS