Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

A Mini Solution to the Coming Food Crisis

By R.J. Ruppenthal, Chelsea Green Publishing. Posted October 23, 2009.


What if each of us could produce just 10 percent of our own food at home? What a huge difference that would make.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Most of us are at least a little bit worried about the future of the world, and some folks are downright paranoid. The truth is that the future isn't looking too bright at the moment. Humankind is quickly running through our remaining supplies of the resources that have made our lifestyles tick, and the future appears to be one where peak oil, peak phosphorus, climate change, the growing unpredictability of water supplies, and other resource limitations will place tremendous pressure on humankind.

Well, add to this the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization's (FAO's) recent warning that the world will need to produce 70% more food by 2050 in order to feed the world's population. This is due to a huge increase in world population, more urbanization, and the impacts of climate change (basically, variable rainfall with more regional floods and droughts, more pests and disease, and a shifting of agricultural areas to accommodate change). The upshot: this report recommends that a huge amount of new cropland be "created" and that governments around the world, particularly in developing countries, spend large amounts of money (a 50% increase from now) developing new food production.

Does "creating" new cropland mean chopping down the rainforests? If so, I'm against it, yet I realize that people in poorer countries need to eat. Irrigating the desert is a great idea if there is enough water and enough cheap energy to pump it for hundreds or thousands of miles. On either score, I have my doubts. In between those two extremes, there are probably other places that can be farmed, but reasons why they have not historically been farmed: overall it's going to require huge inputs of both water and fertilizer to make this happen. Water is getting scarcer and more expensive (as mentioned above), while fertilizer depends upon phosphorus (which is peaking) and chemical fertilizers require natural gas for their production process (scarcer and more expensive as well).

And then there's the fact that farmers can't afford to buy seeds anymore. One of those big multinational companies owns the property rights to them, so you need to pay them a license that is prohibitively priced in the developing world. They'll sell you seeds for rice that produce twice as much as the last kind, and are twice as disease resistant, but they cost four times as much. Oh, and also, biofuel production is set to increase by 90% in the next ten years (and probably more than that as we realize we're running out of affordable oil) so food production is competing with energy production on our prime growing land. Tell the peasants they can't eat the corn; it's going in someone's gas tank.

Well, I have no comprehensive solutions except the conviction that we need to live within our means. Easier said than done, right? At the very least, everything I've written above forces the conclusion that fresh food will become much more expensive in the coming years. But I do have a partial "mini-solution" which is that every person should start growing a little more of his/her own fresh food. Increased urbanization around the world means that urban residents need to take charge of (at least a small part of) their own food production. Yes, you can farm on a balcony, on a patio, and even on a sidewalk. You can sprout your own fresh food anyplace, anytime. You can plant a neighborhood fruit tree that can feed the whole block with a month of fresh fruit. Or a dwarf fruit tree on your doorstep in a container of dirt.

Actually, there is a lot you can do to produce your own food, even in a small living space. Granted, there's a lot you cannot do also. But what if each of us could produce just 10% of our own food at home? What a huge difference that would make in better nutrition, decreased household expenses, plus reduced energy use and carbon outputs from not having to produce that food and transport it for hundreds or thousands of miles. if each of us aims for helping out just a little, we can all make a big impact collectively. Give it a shot. This is a great time to think about a winter garden (if your climate allows), or sprouting, or mushrooming, or fermenting, or…dreaming of a spring garden. Some of the best plans are hatched during those cold winter months!

BBC article on UN FAO's report: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8303434.stm


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: food, hunger, farming

A licensed attorney and college professor, R. J. Ruppenthal has never given up on his gardening passion, even when his day jobs led him to a more urban life. He currently teaches at Evergreen Valley College in San Jose, California, and lives and gardens in the San Francisco Bay area. He is the author of the book Fresh Food from Small Spaces: The Square-Inch Gardener's Guide to Year-Round Growing, Fermenting, and Sprouting from Chelsea Green.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Join a CSA
Posted by: larryschmidt on Oct 24, 2009 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, we can all grow some of our own food in our back yards. But supporting a local CSA is another great way to create sane, sustainable agriculture. Check out this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMrO-oBEj8c

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» CSAs rock! Posted by: smendler
Its a lifestyle not a fad.....
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth on Oct 27, 2009 6:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For years I have seen articles like this on a regular basis, from the NYTimes to AOL news links, various magazines etc.

Yet the question always remains. So why aren't more people doing this? Because its a fad for many people? Because of laziness? Because its to easy to go back to materialistic ways?

What I never see being discussed is how do we get people to do this as a lifestyle and not simply for a few months or years?

It is a lifestyle change, which we have done for decades.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I got your phosphorus
Posted by: better vision on Oct 27, 2009 6:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it interesting that the Attorney General in the state of Oklahoma has a law suit before the courts right now because the chicken farms of the Oklahoma and Arkansas border area are polluting the Illinois River with phosphorus. That's right folks, there is so much phosphorus in chicken s@@t that all of the fields where they are dumping the manure have toooo much phosphorus in them and it's bleeding out into the streams. The reason the chicken farms won't move the manure to more distant locations where it is needed is because they would have to raise the cost by as much as a half penny per bird - yes seriously. Now multiply that 1/2 penny times the number of chickens in a large contract sale and see how much it is. It's enough that the colonel might buy his chickens elsewhere. So if you think that we are nearing peak phosphorus - I know where you can buy it by the tons and solve another problem.

The cost of producing food in large specialty farms is so low that you as an individual are wasting your time to grow your own. You can actually buy a can of corn cheaper than you can grow a single ear of corn. Mentally, we have to move past the cost of things and into the bigger picture. The cost of fuel and food is far more than what you are paying for it. In addition to the CSA mentioned above, we need community canning for food preservation. We need to stop importing fresh fruit and vegetables from Chile and Argentina during our winter months. We need to use some of that waste land that we currently just mow.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Peak Oil + Climate Change = The Perfect Storm
Posted by: ronniejw on Oct 27, 2009 11:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Peak Oil + Climate Change = The Perfect Storm. Not only will we not be able to increase production but production will drastically decline. We are on the verge of massive food shortages all across the entire planet. Scientist are even predicting famine here in Australia over the next few decades; the UK has set up an official plan to make all its citizens go vegetarian if or when the famine hits there. People will either have to grow much of their own food or go hungry. That is the future we have made for ourselves.

Ronnie Wright
World Change Cafe

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Permaculture and Agroecology can save us
Posted by: Small Footprint Mama on Oct 29, 2009 2:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Permaculture and agroecological best practices (in combination with land use reform worldwide) can produce enough food without cutting down trees.

For example, we can all grow our own, and polycultural smallholdings are more productive than large-scale monocultures will ever be. We should let anyone who wants to grow food grow it (specifically in the developing world where smallholders are displaced for commodity and luxury crop farmers)

Permaculture (permanent agriculture) techniques are adaptable to improve and make productive just about any land anywhere. They can be done on a patio or a large field. Most encouraging, Permaculture practices are bring life back to the desert in Jordan WITHOUT the use of a lot of water.

Since biofuels are more polluting and less efficient than oil (in the full cost accounting), we should cease using land for them immediately.

We should also stop growing huge monocultures of inedible corn (yes, inedible) and soy to feed livestock, and put those animals back on marginal lands, savannahs and grasslands where they were ecologically meant to be, and where they sequester carbon, improve the soil (through mob grazing and holistic management), and provide food in areas we cannot otherwise grow it.

Lastly, we should relocalize our food systems worldwide. It is environmentally unjust that Americans should use up the soil and water in developing countries so we can have all the meat, chocolate and bananas we want, when a majority of those populations often have poor nutrition and live in poverty

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Y'know, that's only about 100 zucchini or so
Posted by: smendler on Oct 29, 2009 9:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe 150. That should be doable...!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes !
Posted by: TomOfMaine on Oct 29, 2009 6:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Absolutely R.J., thank you for the great article !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement